Understanding Performance Management

Table of Contents
A.C. 1.1 Explain formal and informal performance evaluation in the workplace..............................3
A.C. 1.2 In performance management, explain the job of the first-line manager...............................3
A.C. 2.1 Identify ways to ensure fair and objective formal assessment.............................................3
A.C. 2.2 Explain how to set SMART objectives for a team member.................................................4
A.C. 2.3 Explain how to set performance standards for a team member............................................5
A.C. 2.4 Explain how to measure performance against agreed standards..........................................6
A.C. 3.1 - Explain the importance of feedback to improve performance...........................................7
A.C. 3.2 - Describe how to give effective feedback...........................................................................7
A.C. 4.1 - Identify potential areas of underperformance in the workplace.........................................8
A.C. 4.2 - Determine the root reasons for performance shortfalls......................................................8
A.C. 4.3 - Describe actions to restore performance to acceptable levels............................................9
References...........................................................................................................................................10
A.C. 1.1 Explain formal and informal performance evaluation in the workplace.

A mentor's role is to guarantee that informal evaluations are conducted regularly in the course

of their work relationship and that their employees' progress can be tracked in real-time. This form of

evaluation can be accomplished through job-related conversations, a casual get-together over coffee,

or an on-site inspection of a particular piece of work. Employees can benefit from less formal

assessments by gaining as much information as possible without causing delays or mistakes. This

increases their chances of changing their behaviour (Aboalshamat et al., 2020). It is possible to avoid

such surprises since informal feeds to employees are noted in the official assessment. Formal

assessments should never take the place of informal ones, even if the latter is more convenient. As

part of a worker's yearly performance assessment, this is commonly used for more official discussions

between a manager and an employee. Maintaining a fresh annual evaluation is a priority for me as a

line manager. This form of evaluation focuses on the employee's accomplishments as well as their

efforts to correct any flaws they may have.

A.C. 1.2 In performance management, explain the job of the first-line manager.

It is the first-line manager’s responsibility to make sure that his team accomplishes its goals.

A first-line manager is responsible for providing consistent direction to the members of his staff to

ensure that his team performs properly and that its members comprehend both their individual and

collective goals, as well as how they contribute to the advancement of the business. When they see

their employees succeed, they may promote their feedback and help guide their development (Phillips

et al., 2016). As a new employee, you may support them by saying "up to date" to help them feel

more confident in their role, or you can give them input or assign them tasks to help them rise to a

specific position. As a manager, I believe that performance is just as important, whether it's a simple

"thank you" or a more formal thank you. Identifying the fundamental reason for a team member's

noncompliance with requirements is critical. Everyone who is straining to deliver resources and

equipment should report to you as their first-line manager.

A.C. 2.1 Identify ways to ensure fair and objective formal assessment.

To determine remuneration, incentive, promotion, and transfer choices, an assessment of

employee performance is necessary. As a result, it has a profound effect on staff morale and
motivation (Yu et al., 2020). But when it comes to making judgments on employee transfers, salary,

advancement, and recognition, supervisors must use extreme caution. Employee morale suffers when

they see their efforts and contributions go unnoticed. The approaches listed below allow managers to

conduct performance reviews that are both fair and objective.

Fair Progress System

It is the primary objective of doing an employee evaluation to enhance the performance of the

employee and to provide assistance to them. Identifying and correcting implementation hurdles is a

joint responsibility of both management and staff (Bozer et al., 2021). If employees aren't included in

the decision-making process, it might be unreasonable to expect them to return to high levels of

performance.

Fair Performance Review

For the assessors to grasp the aims of performance evaluation, the organisation must train

them. They should be aware of how the performance review system operates, be able to provide

constructive comments and maintain a focus on capabilities and behaviour as opposed to personalities

(Yu et al., 2020). When it comes to evaluating their performance, employees should be given the

freedom to do so at will.

Fair Report

Even before conducting interviews, managers may reflect on what they've seen of their staff

in the real world (Bozer et al., 2021). Because a superficial assessment of an employee's performance

cannot provide sufficient and correct information, the management should spend more time observing

and recording data to get a more complete picture.

Fair Assessment

Each employee's job description and how their performance is being evaluated should be

clearly stated in an evaluation assessment. Employees and employers benefit from open

communication when this type of information is shared.

A.C. 2.2 Explain how to set SMART objectives for a team member.

Goals that are measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound are referred to as SMART. An

organization's key success statistics, such as earnings, or the accomplishment of a specific objective
are all examples of typical metrics (Jones, 2016). Good public health practice involves solid

objectives to assess improvement in the direction of reaching goals and results. Various programmes

and services are supported by awards that involve planning, executing, and achieving goals to

guarantee success for future funding. Organizations strive to set meaningful goals that effectively

evaluate improvement in the direction of a goal.

 The aim must be explicit and not vague or nonspecific, e.g., safety.

 To determine whether a project is a success, you must first determine whether it can be measured,

e.g., patient care.

 It must be possible to fulfil a goal with the money that is available, e.g., efficiency.

 The goal or target specified is related to the organization's objectives and will have an impact on

the business, e.g., accuracy.

 A date is required to compute the mission's duration, e.g., learning and development.

A.C. 2.3 Explain how to set performance standards for a team member.

Managers must keep tabs on and establish expectations for their workers' performance to help them

grow professionally. Both managers and team members should be involved in defining and setting

performance criteria to guarantee that everyone is on the same page and ready to commit. There is a

greater sense of accountability and incentive when employees have a say in determining their

performance criteria.

Evaluation

It is of the utmost importance to analyse and revise the job requirements with the workforce

and to discuss the kinds of objectives employees should set for themselves. The benchmark must be

measurable so that managers can monitor and compare the performance of their employees over time.

Comparing performance amongst employees in the same role is made easier when they are measured

using metrics.

Data from the past

Before setting new performance objectives, it is critical to undertake a thorough analysis of all

available historical data on existing goals.

Make sure everyone knows what they're expected to accomplish and how they can help the

team achieve it. By the end of the month, for example, the salesman must raise sales by 15%.

Frequent meetings and debate

Regular meetings to discuss and execute new performance requirements should be held on a

monthly or every six-week cycle, as appropriate. The end-of-month meeting at Milltech, for example,

is used to discuss issues and areas that require development. Regular meetings allow team members to

share their thoughts and suggestions for enhancing their work performance.

A.C. 2.4 Explain how to measure performance against agreed standards.

Continual Examination 

Many businesses choose to conduct performance evaluations regularly rather than once every

few months or once a year. As a result, regular feedback aids in the early detection of issues and the

implementation of corrective measures before they worsen.

Checklist

With the use of a checklist, it is simple to track employee performance and identify those

employees who are underperforming and may require more support. In addition, it aids in identifying

people who require further education and training to perform at a higher level.

Self-Evaluation

To get the greatest results, you should ask your staff to do a self-assessment. Employees who

are held accountable for their work may be more concerned about it than the team's leaders. With the

use of this exam, team leaders may help their employees better understand how well they're

performing.

360 feedback

Using the system, employees from all departments and levels of the organisation may provide

input on their ideas, thoughts, comments, and assessments of their performance. When using 360-

degree feedback, you may assess input from a wide range of sources, allowing you to see both good

and negative trends as well as areas in need of improvement.

Visual ratings
 When it comes to evaluating employee performance, the typical graphical scale employs the

digits 1-10. Decision-making and comprehending certain activities can be placed on a scale of one to

ten.

A.C. 3.1 - Explain the importance of feedback to improve performance.

Achieve the expected results and obtain timely feedback from your team members by clearly defining

their roles and responsibilities. You'll gain more self-confidence and feel better about your work if

you conduct daily evaluations. It would be a wonderful learning experience for the team member to

take advice on failures and faults so that they may reflect on whatever went down and what they can

do to avoid making the same mistake again (Yu et al., 2020). You must communicate clearly and

succinctly with anyone who isn't meeting the basic criteria of success to be conscious of the necessity

for change, and it's also an excellent beginning point for an open debate about productivity and what

the group member can do to improve performance with the support of the manager.

A.C. 3.2 - Describe how to give effective feedback.

As a manager, I prefer to use the CORBS feedback approach when I must give an employee

feedback.

 Make a concise and unambiguous description of the situation or actions.

 If you're referring to someone else, use terms and vocabulary like "I feel," "I believe," or "you are"

instead of "you."

 The default behaviour is to deliver the information to the case in the simplest form imaginable so

that it will be remembered.

 In place of having things go in one direction alone, it is healthy to incorporate both negative and

positive feedback.

 At its most fundamental, the feedback should be concentrated on the enforcement.

 When confronted with negative feedback in the structured framework, I turn to the BEEF model

for support.

 How a person acts or behaves is known as their comportment.

 A single illustration of a problem or activity is referred to as an example.

something happening.

 You can have everything you desire in the future, starting right now.

A.C. 4.1 - Identify potential areas of underperformance in the workplace.

Since underperformance may be so costly and detrimental, any organisation should consider

addressing the issue. Underperformance can be caused by a variety of factors, including the

following:

Lack Of Space For Growth

It's not uncommon to have employees that don't care about their performance and are content

to show in, do their thing, and go home. Others, on the other hand, are aware of the company's

potential for growth. The lack of room for advancement can have a detrimental influence on an

employee's overall performance. Consequently.

Motivation

There are several common workplace issues, such as employee dissatisfaction, that contribute

to underperformance.

Inspiration

It's impossible to expect good performance from personnel if they aren't enthused about what

they do. Having inspiring executives in the firm, for example, can lead to more motivated employees,

which can have a favourable effect on productivity.

A Lack Of Praise And Acknowledgement

When employees feel valued and recognised via the use of incentives, they are more

productive. They may, for example, decide to leave and seek employment with another satisfying

organisation.

Inadequate Leadership

Disengaged and disorganised managers are less expected to provide a positive work

environment, which in turn has a negative influence on team performance and productivity.
A.C. 4.2 - Determine the root reasons for performance shortfalls.

An essential part of training is A member of staff who may not be equipped to do their tasks due to a

lack of relevant experience or competence. Adding a new task or having a new employee who is

unable to learn how to do this work might be to blame. An example of an impetus is someone on the

team who is qualified yet unable to do their duties. Lack of rapport with the supervisor, disinterest in

routine tasks, or an unwillingness to complete them is all possible explanations (Bozer et al., 2021). A

problem with capacity occurs when a person in our team is doing everything they can and knows to

do to finish their task, yet it is still not enough. This may be the result of problems at work or home,

both of which hurt the individual's performance at work. A systematic problem, such as several teams

that don't operate properly. It's possible that sharing information or providing services can cause you

some headaches.

A.C. 4.3 - Describe actions to restore performance to acceptable levels.

To get the results back on track, you need to identify and address the error with your teammate. You

should gather evidence to support your claims of underperformance. Recommendation: Copies of

previous assessments, ideas, and proposals to enhance performance have also been suggested

(Crocker et al., 2016). A meeting with your team member is necessary once the data has been

collected so that you may explain your findings and present the proof you've gathered. Try to interact

with the member of the team and listen to what they have to say because they are already familiar

with the problem and have ideas about how it may be improved. It is possible to work out a plan of

action with your supervisor and your team member after this initial discussion (Green et al., 2020).

Retraining on a new task, mentorship and supervision from managers, or a reduction in the workload

of team members are all options. Team members who fail to follow and finish this approach, such as

through disciplinary measures that might lead to their dismissal, must be fully informed of the

consequences.
 References

Aboalshamat, K., Al-Zaidi, D., Jawa, D., Al-Harbi, H., Alharbi, R. and Al-Otaibi, S., 2020. The effect

of life coaching on psychological distress among dental students: interventional study. BMC

psychology, 8(1), pp.1-8.

Arena, D., Perini, S., Taisch, M. and Kiritsis, D., 2018. The Training Data Evaluation Tool: Towards

a unified ontology-based solution for industrial training evaluation. Procedia

Manufacturing, 23, pp.219-224.

Bozer, G. and Jones, R.J., 2018. Understanding the factors that determine workplace coaching

effectiveness: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Work and Organizational

Psychology, 27(3), pp.342-361.

Bozer, G. and Jones, R.J., 2021. Introduction to the special issue on advances in the psychology of

workplace coaching. Applied Psychology, 70(2), pp.411-419.

Crocker, J., Shields, K.F., Venkataramanan, V., Saywell, D. and Bartram, J., 2016. Building capacity

for water, sanitation, and hygiene programming: Training evaluation theory applied to CLTS

management training in Kenya. Social Science & Medicine, 166, pp.66-76.

Green, S., Grant, A.M. and Rynsaardt, J., 2020. Evidence ‐based life coaching for senior high school

students: Building hardiness and hope. Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader,

pp.257-268.

Jones, R., 2016. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and

performance outcomes; scale development; theoretical model of individual differences and

longitudinal study (Doctoral dissertation, Aston University).

Jones, R.J., Woods, S.A. and Guillaume, Y.R., 2016. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A

meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching.  Journal of Occupational

and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), pp.249-277.

Phillips, J.J. and Phillips, P.P., 2016. Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods.

Routledge.
Yu, N., Collins, C.G., Cavanagh, M., White, K. and Fairbrother, G., 2020. Positive coaching with

frontline managers: enhancing their effectiveness and understanding why. Coaching

Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, pp.269-283.