0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views11 pages

TLP 2 0 User Guide 508c

Uploaded by

Dexter Forster
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views11 pages

TLP 2 0 User Guide 508c

Uploaded by

Dexter Forster
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Traffic Light Protocol 2.

0
User Guide

Publication: September 2022


Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
Table of Contents
Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 3
TLP 2.0 Changes ............................................................................................................................... 3
TLP Usage Guidance......................................................................................................................... 3
Appendix A: TLP 2.0 Definitions ....................................................................................................... 5
Appendix B: TLP 2.0 Terminology Definitions and Colors.................................................................. 6
TLP 2.0 Terminology Definitions..................................................................................................... 6
TLP 2.0 Color Coding ...................................................................................................................... 6
Appendix C: TLP Use Cases............................................................................................................... 7
TLP Recipient-Based Chart of Use Cases ......................................................................................... 7
Appendix D: TLP 2.0 Frequently Asked Questions .......................................................................... 11

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 2


Background
Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) is a system of markings that designates the extent to which recipients may share
potentially sensitive information. Though the protocol has been in use for nearly two decades by the incident
coordination and response community, the Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) formally
published TLP 1.0 in August 2016. FIRST published TLP 2.0 in August 2022.
Note: TLP is not legally binding and does not override legal restrictions or obligations. TLP is not a formal
classification scheme and was not designed to handle licensing terms, nor information handling or encryption
rules. TLP labels and their definitions are not intended to have any effect on freedom of information or
“sunshine” laws or other laws in any jurisdiction, including the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015,
which provides certain protections for cyber threat indicators shared with federal agencies and also requires
those agencies to share with one another.

Purpose
According to FIRST, the purpose of TLP is “to facilitate greater sharing of potentially sensitive information and
more effective collaboration.” Version 2.0 improves TLP by further clarifying sharing restrictions.

TLP 2.0 Changes


FIRST released TLP 2.0 in early August 2022 so that it may be fully implemented by January 2023. With TLP 2.0,
TLP markings and their definitions are more comprehensive and accessible. TLP 2.0 brings two major changes:
• TLP:CLEAR replaces TLP:WHITE.
• The new TLP:AMBER+STRICT supplements TLP:AMBER, designating that the information may be shared
within the recipient’s organization only.
See Appendix A for revised definitions of TLP markings and Appendix B for TLP 2.0 definitions for the following
terms: community, organization, and clients.
Note: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency will officially move from TLP 1.0 to TLP 2.0 on
November 1, 2022.

TLP Usage Guidance


TLP provides a schema for communicating information sharing permissions. With TLP, the information sender
takes the following steps to instruct recipients on how far they may reshare the information.
1. Determine the recipients with whom you would like to share your information and consult the TLP
definitions and use cases to determine the appropriate TLP marking. (See appendices.)
2. Label your information with the selected TLP designation. (See Appendix B for color coding.)
a. Documents: Insert the TLP label and any caveats in the header and footer of each page. Right-
justify the label, use at least a 12-point font size, and use the correct color coding. Where
needed, designate both the beginning and the end of the text to which each TLP label applies.
b. Automated Information Exchanges: Exchange designers who have incorporated TLP 1.0 should
ensure they upgrade their exchanges to TLP 2.0. Exchange designers should determine how
best to incorporate TLP in their exchanges.
c. Emails and Chats: TLP-labeled messaging must indicate the TLP label of the information, as well
as any caveats, directly prior to the information itself. For emails, begin the subject line with the
TLP label (include any caveat in the subject line or at the start of the message). Where needed,
designate both the beginning and the end of the text to which each TLP label applies. For

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 3


standing chat channels, a pinned message or rules of behavior document may establish a
default TLP level for the channel that applies in the absence of a specific marking.
d. Verbal Discussions: In verbal discussions, speakers may designate the information they are
communicating at a TLP level and, if needed, caveat. Participants should assume information is
TLP:CLEAR if the speaker does not provide a designation. Conference programs may designate
TLP levels for speeches/discussions with the understanding that the lack of a designation
signifies TLP:CLEAR. Conference programs may also designate a TLP level as the default level if
the speaker does not provide a designation.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 4


Appendix A: TLP 2.0 Definitions
In TLP 2.0, FIRST further clarified the meanings of the four TLP designations. (Gray text is 1.0; black text is 2.0.)
1.0 TLP:RED = Not for disclosure, restricted to participants only. Sources may use TLP:RED when information
cannot be effectively acted upon by additional parties, and could lead to impacts on a party’s privacy, reputation,
or operations if misused. Recipients may not share TLP:RED information with any parties outside of the specific
exchange, meeting, or conversation in which it was originally disclosed. In the context of a meeting, for example,
TLP:RED information is limited to those present at the meeting. In most circumstances, TLP:RED should be
exchanged verbally or in person.
2.0 TLP:RED = For the eyes and ears of individual recipients only, no further disclosure. Sources may use
TLP:RED when information cannot be effectively acted upon without significant risk for the privacy, reputation, or
operations of the organizations involved. Recipients may therefore not share TLP:RED information with anyone
else. In the context of a meeting, for example, TLP:RED information is limited to those present at the meeting.
1.0 TLP:AMBER = Limited disclosure, restricted to participants’ organizations. Sources may use TLP:AMBER when
information requires support to be effectively acted upon, yet carries risks to privacy, reputation, or operations if
shared outside of the organizations involved. Recipients may only share TLP:AMBER information with members
of their own organization, and with clients or customers who need to know the information to protect themselves
or prevent further harm. Sources are at liberty to specify additional intended limits of the sharing: these must be
adhered to.
2.0 TLP:AMBER = Limited disclosure, recipients can only spread this on a need-to-know basis within their
organization and its clients. Note that TLP:AMBER+STRICT restricts sharing to the organization only. Sources may
use TLP:AMBER when information requires support to be effectively acted upon, yet carries risk to privacy,
reputation, or operations if shared outside of the organizations involved. Recipients may share TLP:AMBER
information with members of their own organization and its clients, but only on a need-to-know basis to protect
their organization and its clients and prevent further harm. Note: If the source wants to restrict sharing to the
organization only, they must specify TLP:AMBER+STRICT.
1.0 TLP:GREEN = Limited disclosure, restricted to the community. Sources may use TLP:GREEN when
information is useful for the awareness of all participating organizations as well as with peers within the broader
community or sector. Recipients may share TLP:GREEN information with peers and partner organizations within
their sector or community, but not via publicly accessible channels. Information in this category can be circulated
widely within a particular community. TLP:GREEN information may not be released outside of the community.
2.0 TLP:GREEN = Limited disclosure, recipients can spread this within their community. Sources may use
TLP:GREEN when information is useful to increase awareness within their wider community. Recipients may
share TLP:GREEN information with peers and partner organizations within their community, but not via publicly
accessible channels. TLP:GREEN information may not be shared outside of the community. Note: When
“community” is not defined, assume the cybersecurity/cyber defense community.
1.0 TLP:WHITE = Disclosure is not limited. Sources may use TLP:WHITE when information carries minimal or no
foreseeable risk of misuse, in accordance with applicable rules and procedures for public release. Subject to
standard copyright rules, TLP:WHITE information may be distributed without restriction.
2.0 TLP:CLEAR = Recipients can spread this to the world, there is no limit on disclosure. Sources may use
TLP:CLEAR when information carries minimal or no foreseeable risk of misuse, in accordance with applicable
rules and procedures for public release. Subject to standard copyright rules, TLP:CLEAR information may be
shared without restriction.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 5


Appendix B: TLP 2.0 Terminology Definitions and Colors

TLP 2.0 Terminology Definitions


In TLP 2.0, FIRST has provided the following definitions for commonly used terms:
Community: Under TLP, a community is a group who share common goals, practices, and informal trust
relationships. A community can be as broad as all cybersecurity practitioners in a country (or in a sector or
region).
Organization: Under TLP, an organization is a group who share a common affiliation by formal membership and
are bound by common policies set by the organization. An organization can be as broad as all members of an
information sharing organization, but rarely broader.
Clients: Under TLP, clients are those people or entities that receive cybersecurity services from an organization.
Clients are by default included in TLP:AMBER so that the recipients may share information further downstream in
order for clients to take action to protect themselves. For teams with national responsibility, this definition
includes stakeholders and constituents. 1

TLP 2.0 Color Coding


In TLP 2.0, FIRST has provided color coding in RGB, CMYK, and Hex.
RGB: RGB: CMYK: CMYK:
Hex: Hex:
TLP Colors font background font background
font background
R G B R G B C M Y K C M Y K

TLP:RED 255 43 43 0 0 0 0 83 83 0 0 0 0 100 #FF2B2B #000000

TLP:AMBER 255 192 0 0 0 0 0 25 100 0 0 0 0 100 #FFC000 #000000

TLP:GREEN 51 255 0 0 0 0 79 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 #33FF00 #000000

TLP:CLEAR 255 255 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 #FFFFFF #000000

Note: TLP is designed to accommodate individuals with low vision, who struggle to read text or cannot see it at
all when there is too little color contrast between text and background. Originators should adhere to the TLP
color coding to ensure enough color contrast for such readers.

1 CISA considers “clients” to be stakeholders and constituents that have a legal agreement with CISA.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 6


Appendix C: TLP Use Cases

TLP Recipient-Based Chart of Use Cases


The following chart may be helpful in determining how you may share information that you receive with TLP
markings. In all cases, if you and others are co-recipients of the same TLP-marked information, you may discuss
and share that information with one another regardless of the TLP marking.

Can I share this


I am a … Answer
information with …
A staff member that • Constituents,* You may share TLP:CLEAR information.
serves a cybersecurity You may share TLP:GREEN information with recipients who
• National security
function within a are part of the community as defined by the caveat.
partner agencies, and
government agency.
• Regional • When “community” is not defined, recipients should
governments? assume they may share TLP:GREEN information
with the cybersecurity/cyber defense community.
*See Appendix B above for • Originators concerned that recipients may share
definition of client, which their TLP:GREEN information further than intended
includes constituents. should add a caveat that defines the community for
the information.
You may share TLP:AMBER information with clients, which in
this context includes constituents, national security partner
agencies, and regional governments that have a need to
know the information (e.g., they provide cybersecurity
services). When you do so, you should mark it
TLP:AMBER+STRICT to ensure that recipients do not further
disseminate it to their constituents, as only your
organization has been authorized to do that by the
originator.
Note: TLP assumes the originator and recipient have agreed
to protect the information.
• As with TLP:GREEN, originators concerned that
recipients may share their TLP:AMBER information
further than intended should add a caveat to
explicitly communicate sharing restrictions for the
information.
You may not share TLP:AMBER+STRICT information with
organizations outside your immediate agency without
permission. If further sharing is desired, contact the
originator to request permission to share with other
organizations.
Note: You may use this information to protect outside
organizations without sharing the document with them.

You may not share TLP:RED information.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 7


Can I share this
I am a … Answer
information with …
Multinational • Subsidiaries, You may share TLP:CLEAR information.
conglomerate staff • My parent company, You may share TLP:GREEN information with recipients who
member. and are part of the community as defined by the caveat.
• Our branch • When “community” is not defined, recipients should
organizations assume they may share TLP:GREEN information
domestically and in with the cybersecurity/cyber defense community.
other countries? • Originators concerned that recipients may share
their TLP:GREEN information further than intended
should add a caveat that defines the community for
the information.
You may share TLP:AMBER information with subsidiaries,
your parent company, and/or branch organizations if your
organization provides cyber services for them; however, you
must mark the information TLP:AMBER+STRICT to ensure
these recipients do not further share the information (e.g.,
to other subsidiaries) without explicit permission from the
originator.
Note: TLP assumes the originator and recipient have agreed
to protect the information.

You may not share TLP:AMBER+STRICT information with


subsidiaries, your parent company, and/or branch
organizations without obtaining permission from the
originator.
You may share TLP:AMBER+STRICT information with staff
members within your immediate organization who help your
team provide cybersecurity services.
Note: You/your team/your organization may use this
information to protect subsidiaries, your parent company,
and/or branch organizations without sharing the
information to them.
You may not share TLP:RED information.

A member of a critical • Peers in my sector? You may share TLP:CLEAR and TLP:GREEN information.
infrastructure sector.
You may not share TLP:AMBER information with peers
unless they are your clients and have a need to know the
information.
You may not share TLP:AMBER+STRICT outside your
organization unless the peer you wish to share with is a co-
recipient of this information, as described above.

You may not share TLP:RED information.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 8


Can I share this
I am a … Answer
information with …
A member of an • Other members in the You may share TLP:CLEAR information with ISAC/formal
information sharing ISAC/formal sharing sharing group members.
and analysis center group? You may share TLP:GREEN information with recipients who
(ISAC)/formal sharing are part of the community as defined by the caveat.
group.
• When “community” is not defined, recipients should
assume they may share TLP:GREEN information
with the cybersecurity/cyber defense community.
Originators concerned that recipients may share their
TLP:GREEN information further than intended should add a
caveat that defines the community for the information.

If you are a member of the of the ISAC/formal sharing group


management body, you may share TLP:AMBER information
with the group members if the information was sent to the
ISAC/formal sharing group.
You may not share the information with the members if you
are not part of the ISAC/formal sharing group’s
management body.
Note: TLP assumes that the ISAC/formal sharing group and
its members have agreed to protect TLP:AMBER
information.

You may not share TLP:AMBER+STRICT information with


members unless you obtain permission from the originator
to do so.
Note: Even when TLP:AMBER+STRICT information is sent to
the ISAC/formal sharing group management body, the
management body may not share it with members without
first obtaining permission from the originator.
Do not share TLP:RED information.

An organization that • Organizations You may share TLP:CLEAR and TLP:GREEN information with
receives outsourced providing us organizations providing you cybersecurity services.
cybersecurity services. cybersecurity
services? Do not share TLP:AMBER or TLP:AMBER+STRICT
information without obtaining permission from the
originator.
Note: TLP assumes the originator and recipient have agreed
to protect the information.
Do not share TLP:RED information.

An organization that You may share TLP:CLEAR with organizations providing you
receives outsourced services you wish to protect.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 9


Can I share this
I am a … Answer
information with …
services (e.g., • Organizations You may share TLP:GREEN information that your
payment, HVAC, chip providing us these organization receives with organizations that provide
manufactures, services? services to you.
website). Note: When “community” is not defined, assume the
cybersecurity/cyber defense community.
You may not share TLP:AMBER or TLP:AMBER+STRICT
information without permission.
Note: TLP assumes the originator and recipient have agreed
to protect the information.
Anyone receiving TLP- • Organizations and/or You must obtain permission from the originator to share
marked information individuals outside outside the TLP limitation. To seek this permission, you can:
regularly from an the limitation of the • Request the orginator add a caveat stating the
organization. TLP marking? information can be shared to the recipients.
• Establish a formal agreement with the originator
that describes the specific recipients with whom
you will further share their information.
• Ask the originator for permission—each time you
receive information from them—to further share to
specific recipients.
Examples of caveats:
• You may share this information with any [domestic]
organization providing you with cyber-related
services. [Organizations providing you cyber
services may not use the information for other
clients.]
This generic wording allows for both ongoing
services as well as incident response services. The
word “domestic” is optional. The restriction on use
for other clients is optional; it is implied for
TLP:AMBER+STRICT.
• You may share this information with your parent
organization. They may not share it with any sub-
organizations without explicit permission.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 10


Appendix D: TLP 2.0 Frequently Asked Questions
1. What should I do if the information I have received has a TLP marking that restricts me from sharing it
with a client/peer/trust group/service provider that needs to know this information?
You can take one of three actions to resolve this issue:
a. Contact the originator and request permission to share it with your client/peer/trust
group/service provider.
b. Establish an agreement with the originator.
c. Request that the originator add explicit permissions so that you may share the information
with your need-to-know client/peer/trust group/service provider.
2. If I have received TLP:AMBER information and shared it with my clients, why can’t I simply allow those
clients to further share this information with their cyber services providers at TLP:AMBER?
Allowing recipients of TLP:AMBER information to share it at the TLP:AMBER level with their cyber services
providers would not restrict those providers from further sharing the information to other clients, who may
in turn share the information on to their respective clients and service providers, effectively making
TLP:AMBER the same as TLP:GREEN.
3. What possibilities should I take into consideration when permitting recipient organizations to further share
my TLP:AMBER information with their cyber services and incident response providers?
Consider that the provider may be from another country and/or government. When in doubt, reach out to
the recipient to fully understand with whom they would like to share the information.
4. What should I keep in mind when sharing information at the TLP:GREEN level?
To avoid a recipient sharing TLP:GREEN further than you intended, ensure recipients understand they are
receiving the information because they are members of a defined community.
5. What should I do if none of the TLP levels fit how I want to share my information?
You may add a caveat to the TLP level you choose for your information that provides explicit details on the
extent to which the information may be shared. You may also choose to establish an agreement with the
recipient organization that includes these details for all information being shared from your organization.

CISA | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 11

You might also like