Final Manuscript For Binding
Final Manuscript For Binding
JUNE 2022
Republic of the Philippines
CENTRAL MINDANAO UNIVERSITY
Musuan, Maramag Bukidnon
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
APPROVAL SHEET
Recommending Approval:
Approved:
iii
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
iv
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
v
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
The seminars and webinars she had attended are the Gender and
Development (GAD) Seminar, Career Guidance Webinar, Marketing Me Live
Webinar, Online Discussion on Chastity and Relationship, and Structural
Analysis and Design Program (STAAD Pro) Training Workshop.
vi
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
vii
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
The training and webinars she attended are Career Guidance Webinar
and Online Discussion on Chastity and Relationship by CMU Guidance
Counseling Center, Marketing Me Live Webinar of CMU-OASP, PICE-XUSC’s
We Conduit Training, and Structural Analysis and Design Program (STAAD
Pro) Training Workshop.
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, the authors are very grateful to God Almighty for
giving them life and providing them with the strength, inspiration, guidance,
and good health required to complete their capstone study.
Sincere respect and gratitude are extended to the following people who
in one way or another, have contributed in making this study possible.
To Prof. Gladys G. Silabay, capstone adviser, for providing the authors
invaluable supervision, support, kindness, and insightful comments and
suggestions throughout the course. To the panel members, Dr. Paulino R.
Reomero and Engr. Eric L. Cenabre for the knowledge and wisdom they have
imparted. It was a great privilege and honor to work and study under their
guidance. To the faculty and staff of the Civil Engineering Department,
especially to Dr. Leoncio Mariano Acma, Dr. Catherine Arca, and Engr.
Jemima Perodes for their time, expertise, and assistance.
To Christleen Builders, Malaybalay CDRRMO headed by Chief Alan
Comiso, Engr. Ruben Aba-a and Engr. Michael Chatto of DPWH Engineering
Office, for their time and effort in aiding the authors with their field surveys and
preparations.To the respondents of this study, for being approachable and
cooperative and for spending their time in answering the authors' questions.
To the beloved families of the authors, Mr. & Mrs. Alex P. Alo,
Mr. & Mrs. Eduardo J. Corotan, Mr. & Mrs. Christopher G. Delauta, Mrs. Fe B.
Lavalle, Mr. & Mrs. Nelson C. Modequillo, and Mr. & Mrs. Ronilo G. Padernal,
for their unconditional love, patience, understanding, guidance, and support –
physical, emotional, and financial.
To their friends and classmates, Ara, Sweetzel, Crystal, Angelica,
Toni, Cards, Jemuel, and Evets for their moral support and company. To
Jagape family, for welcoming the researchers in their humble abode during
their preparations. To AJ, Jaen, Lorrainne, Dylyn, Andrew, and Cath for the
teamwork, cooperation, and shared memories.
ix
Once again, the authors want to express their gratitude for your
invaluable support and assistance in completing this study.
TO GOD BE ALL THE GLORY!
x
ABSTRACT
xi
© 2022
Aj Gwen Limocon Alo
Jaen Eudson Apor Corotan
Lorrainne Claire Bulalhog Delauta
Dylyn Balanueco Lavalle
James Andrew Alpas Modequillo
Cathleen Pillerin Padernal
xii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
APPROVAL SHEET ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ix
ABSTRACT xi
LIST OF TABLES xv
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODOLOGY 12
xiii
3.3 Data and Methods 14
Rational Formula
Manning’s Equation
REFERENCES
31
APPENDICES
33
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
xv
LIST OF FIGURES
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
A Itemized Budget 34
Operating Expenses
Letter to CDRRMO-Malaybalay 39
E Program of Works 50
G Documentation 52
xvii
INTRODUCTION
START OF PROJECT
END OF PROJECT
Before getting into the specifics of the various studies, the researchers
would like to start by explaining what a sustainable urban drainage system is.
In the article “Sustainable Urban Drainage” (n.d.), it was mentioned that
sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) have been developed to improve
drainage and reduce the volume of surface runoff in urban areas. Additionally,
it was said that SUDS can be more effective than conventional drainage
methods because they reduce runoff, thereby reducing the risk of flooding,
improve water quality, and are in keeping with the environment and the needs
of the local community. Meanwhile, according to Malamis and Folini (2016),
the control of surface runoff is a key element toward urban sustainability. This
can be achieved either by collecting rainwater for recycling through harvesting
with the advantage of the reduced water demand or by the installation of non-
piped solutions to urban drainage known as Sustainable Urban Drainage
Systems.
7
Rational Method
flood risk maps employed in the study includes the following steps: (1)
digitization of topographical data and preparation of digital elevation model
using ArcGIS, (2) simulation of flood lows of different return periods using a
hydraulic model (HEC-RAS), and (3) preparation of flood risk maps by
integrating the results of (1) and (2). Based on the results, it was observed
that floods could be prevented in this region by adding levees and regulation
of river bottom. Otherwise, most of this flooded area ought to be forested and
kept as a park area. HEC-RAS and GIS software utilization proved helpful in
the analysis of flood control programs in the area.
In an ecological flood control system study conducted by Gao, C., Liu,
J., and Wang, Z. (2013) in Phoenix Island of Huzhou, China, stated that there
were four steps they indicated to develop ecological flood control systems
that prevent floods and retain the ecological functions of water bodies: (1)
Adjusting the water system layout will maintain the integrity and mobility of the
water system and enlarge WSR, with the full consideration of ecological
landscapes; (2) Determining the controlled water levels for different
frequencies can provide references for the construction and operation of
wetlands, shipping, and appropriate ecological landscapes; (3) Flow directions
and residence time are the two essential aspects of mobility. They decide the
location of the landscapes and ensure water quality; (4) Verification of flood
control is helpful to plan specific projects and choose measures according to
flood control demands and ecological requirements.
Handajani, N., et al. (2018) used temporary storage called polder to
overcome flooding in the Mojokerto area in Indonesia caused by the Sadar
river. Polders are a low plot of land surrounded by embankments or
embankments that function to avoid contact with water from outside areas
other than those manually flowing to control flooding. The method used in this
study is the collection of hydrological data, data analysis, simulating the
system with several alternative volumes that can accommodate in the polder.
Alternatives made 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 95% of the flood
discharge plan for a 25-year return period (Q25). Based on the results,
polders control floods in the Sadar river watershed. From the analysis of the
10
system, the polder can control flooding in the Sadar River area by
accommodating 95% of the discharge plan (Q25).
Jocson, J.C., Florencondia, N.T., and Subia, G.S. (2019) conducted a
study that aimed to investigate the flood prevention and mitigation initiatives of
Cabanatuan to gain information that served as the basis for the development
and integration of flood prevention and mitigation initiatives in the City. The
researcher used the descriptive research design with a questionnaire as the
primary tool to gather information from the 110 barangay residents and
officials, Local Government Units (LGU), and Cabanatuan City Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Office officers (CCDRRMO) of the city. The
following are some of the findings of the study conducted: a) Cabanatuan City
is vulnerable to flooding; b) heavy and prolonged rainfall, clogged river,
canals, creeks, and streams, lack of preventive infrastructure and facilities,
and poor implementation of waste management system were the possible
leading causes of flooding in Cabanatuan City; and c) the flood prevention
and mitigation initiatives as to control over the river and control over the land
were moderately implemented while other mitigation measures that the City
Government had done were implemented correctly.
Closed Flood Barriers (CFDs) can detect floods and address them by
closing off the structure while maintaining economic efficiency by not using
any form of electricity as studied by Munyaneza et al. (2013) through
extensive and intensive research on the possible flood control methods via
hydraulic structures on Nyabugogo River. The researchers proposed a Self-
Closed Flood Barrier (SCFD) as they have concluded that it is the most
suitable flood control program after analysis on the factors that cause flooding
in Nyabugogo River. The structure was an effective flood control mitigation
structure while maintaining low cost and maintenance properties.
A study by Huang, P.H. (2014) aimed to address the flooding in
Snoqualmie, Washington, in the United States of America. Huang, P.H.
(2014) proposed standard flood control methods such as dry-flood proofing
with box barriers and sandbags. The researcher also proposed two
sustainable and suitable solutions to the flooding in the area through research
11
and analysis. The proposed methods were restoring floodplain habitats and
detention ponds/bio-swales.
Cipollini et al. (2021) developed a risk framework for design and risk
assessment that is generic, consistent, and structure-based. The framework
linked the hydraulic response of the hydraulic structure with the statistical
distribution of hydrological processes. The researchers used two
methodologies to create and evaluate the framework for flood mitigation on an
offline reservoir, including a reduced routing model and a Monte Carlo
procedure, both of which are based on hydrodynamic simulation.
The study of Abendaño et al. (2020) assessed and analyzed the
Manupali watershed's hydrologic response through flood hazard maps,
hydrologic, and hydraulic models. Through the use of a geographical imaging
system, high-resolution digital elevation model, land cover, and hydro-
meteorological data for the area, the researchers generated a hydrograph
model simulation that concluded that the flooding in nearby communities in
Manupali Watershed caused by the increase in return period of the water in
the area.
METHODOLOGY
This capstone project’s step initially starts defining the problem, which
is the flooding at Kalawaig Creek, Brgy. Sumpong, Malaybalay City. The next
course of action is researching legitimate sources regarding the problem. The
third one would be to specify the requirements needed to solve the problem,
which will then lead to evaluating the results gathered to develop a solution to
the problem. See figure 4 below.
PROCEDURAL FRAMEWORK
Preparation of Equipment
In determining the following results for the soil tests listed in the
procedural framework, ASTM D6913 / D6913M - 17 Standard Test Methods
for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis for
Grade Analysis and ASTM D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit,
Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils for the Atterberg Limits. The
samples were collected from Bongbongon, Brgy. Sumpong, Malaybalay City,
Bukidnon and tested at Allied Material Testing Laboratories located in Brgy.
Laguitas, Malaybalay City.
(Eq. 1)
Where;
Qactual = maximum flood discharge (m3/s),
c = dimensionless runoff coefficient,
i = rainfall intensity within time tc (mm/hr); and
A = catchment area (km2).
15
(Eq. 2)
(Eq. 3)
16
Where;
Qcap = discharge capacity (m3/s),
n = Manning’s Roughness Coefficient (refer to Table 2),
A = Cross-sectional area of flow (m2),
S = Canal gradient; and
R = Hydraulic radius (m) = A/P; (P = wetted perimeter)
(Eq. 4)
HEC-RAS assumes that the energy head is constant across the cross-
section and the velocity vector is perpendicular to the cross-section. After
defining the stream geometry, flow values for each reach within the river
system. The channel geometric description and flow rate values are the
primary model inputs for the hydraulic computations (Eric T. 1998, Islam and
Sado 2000). Given the flow and water surface elevation at one cross-section,
the goal of the standard step method is to compute the water surface
elevation at the adjacent cross-section (Hicks and Peacock 2005, Jhonson et.
al. 1999).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the soil tests are presented in Figure 7 in which the soil
in Kalawaig Creek was classified as clayey soil. The maximum flood
discharge or the actual discharge in Kalawaig Creek was calculated using the
rational formula. Based on Table 1 (see page 15), the proposed values for
dimensionless runoff coefficient in the rational formula for forested land
(sandy to clay) is 0.3-0.5 and in this study the value for c used is 0.5. The
value for rainfall intensity within time tc based on the derived equation (refer to
Eq. 2, page 15) from PAGASA is 3.76 mm/hr. The catchment area of 6.58
km2 was determined using QGIS as seen in Figure 8 on the next page. Given
all these values and substituting it to Eq. 1 (see page 14), the maximum flood
discharge is 3.439 m3/sec
gravel, cobbles, and few boulders ranges from 0.040 – 0.05 and has an
average value of 0.045. The cross-sectional area of flow is 6.88 m2, canal
gradient is 0.0265 m/m, and the hydraulic radius is 0.69 m. Using Eq. 4 (see
page 16), the velocity is 2.817 m/s which is less than the allowable maximum
velocity for concrete of 3.0 m/s (refer to Table 3, page 16) therefore it is safe.
Given all these values and substituting it to Eq. 3 (see page 15), the discharge
capacity of the structure is 19.367 m3/sec.
The hydraulic analyses of this study were carried out using HEC-RAS
software. The processing step involved exporting to the HEC-RAS software
and introducing the parameters required to run the flood simulation. The first
parameter that was introduced was the one related to the roughness
coefficient (Manning's roughness coefficient), which has been calculated to be
0.045 and is the same for each station in the cross-sections. For hydrological
data, the actual discharge capacity or maximum flood discharge was
calculated to be 3.439 m3/s using the rational formula as expressed in Eq.1
(see page 14). The simulation was computed with steady flow data, and the
boundary condition was set for normal depth with a value of 0.02650 m/min.
The x, y, points corresponding to survey points in the river cross section are
necessary for input in HEC-RAS this cross was generated through AutoCAD
(see Appendix D). This is where we can observe the water level in each
station in a constant flow situation in HEC-RAS. Q and Manning's are two of
the parameters needed to fully achieve the level of water discharged that the
researchers solved using the rational method to get the steady flow of water.
The results of the HECRAS river station were then utilized to build a suitable
design of a flood control structure to help manage the flood in the research
area.
24
Based on the data collected through the initial survey, assessment, and
analysis using rational method and HEC-RAS, the researchers came into a
unified consensus to design the final hydraulic flood control structure which is
a compound structure consisting of a levee with gabions and riprap as
retaining wall. It was designed to contain the quantity of water that enters the
creek during instances of heavy rains that is the main cause of flooding in the
said area based on data gathered by the researchers during the initial survey
process.
Figure 10. Final design for flood control structure in Kalawaig Creek
Figure 11. Top view of the proposed hydraulic structure with span of 80m
The levee for the left side structure (as shown in Figure 12) is to be
made out of concrete 200 mm thick 12. It is reinforced with 12mmΦ slant and
horizontal bars both spaced at 400mm. It is laid out on the soil backfill with a
layer of gravel in between the two layers for stability and reinforcement. The
face of the levee is equipped with weep holes made from 75mmΦ PVC pipes
and placed on the levee spaced at 2 meters and arranged in a staggered
manner. The crown of the levee is 1m wide and is made out of the same
material as the face of the levee.
The levee is secured into the ground with a concrete foundation with
dimensions 300mm by 300mm. It is reinforced with 6-16mmΦ horizontal bars
secured by 10mmΦ stirrups spaced at 200mm. See Figure 13.
A thin layer of geotextile fabric is placed between the gabions and the
soil backfill. This is to ensure that no water will pass through the gabion
structure from the river which will decrease the stability of the soil backfill and
the entirety of the structure. See Figure 15.
Figure 15. Detailed drawing of the geotextile fabric between the gabion
For the right side of the structure for the flood control structure of the
creek, it is designed to have a retaining wall on the outer side and a grouted
riprap on the creek side. The grouted riprap is designed to be 0.3m thick. It is
placed on the soil backfill after a layer of graded gravel for additional stability
and reinforcement. It is equipped with weep holes made out of 75mmΦ PVC
pipe spaced at 2 meters and staggered every row. See Figure 16.
Figure 17. Detailed drawing of the foundation for the riprap wall
The outer side of this structure is a retaining wall also equipped with
weep holes of the same dimensions as that of the creek side face. It is made
out of concrete 200mm thick and is reinforced with 12mmΦ slant and
horizontal bars both spaced at 400mm. It is equipped with weep holes with
the same dimensions as that of the riprap wall. The entire hydraulic structure
covers the whole span of the study area and has uniform materials used all
throughout the section. See Appendix F.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In this chapter, the conclusions derived from the findings of this study
on the Hydraulic Structure Design for Flood Control in Kalawaig Creek at
Bongbongon, Barangay Sumpong, Malaybalay City, Bukidnon are described.
The conclusions were based on the objectives, gathered data, and study
results. The implications of these findings and the resultant recommendations
will also be explained. Recommendations were based on the objectives of the
study.
Conclusion
Based on the results and discussion of the study, the following conclusions
were drawn:
1. The upstream part of Kalawaig Creek is located in Bongbongon, Brgy.
Sumpong, Malaybalay City, Bukidnon is prone to flooding, especially
during heavy rains. In interviews with CDRRMO, barangay officials and
locals, the main cause of the flood was hours of heavy, continuous
rain. In addition to heavy rainfall, another element of heavy water flow
was the outflow from nearby hills and mountains (e.g., Agnayahon)
since Kalawaig Creek in Bongbongon is the only body of water that
collects all the outflows of water from nearby highlands. It was also
observed by the researchers that the residents are not practicing
proper waste disposal.
2. The discharge capacity, Qcapacity, of the structure equal to 19.367
m3/sec is 82.24% larger compared to the creek’s actual discharge,
Qactual which is equal to 3.439 m3/sec, therefore it is adequate to let a
large volume of water to pass through in the designed area provided
that it does not exceed the discharge capacity of the structure. The
highest water level recorded based on the HEC-RAS hydraulic model
30
was found at Station 0+080 with its height 0.8m from the river bed, thus
the structure’s NGL was based on that elevation.
3. The researchers had decided to design a levee along the research
scope in Kalawaig Creek. The levee designed has a width of 7 meters
along the river bed and 10 meters across the top of the structure. It has
a height of 5 meters with varying volume of backfill depending on every
station’s bank elevation. The left bank levee has a gabion structure
inside the river and the right bank retaining wall has a grouted riprap on
the inner riverside. The list of items included in the Program Of Works
(POW) are the following; Moving in, site work (clearing and surveying,
earthworks such as structure excavation and embankment), flood
control, slope protection, and drainage structures (reinforcing steel,
gabions, grouted riprap with 0.30m thick), PPE, Billboards, and Site
Office, and finally moving out. The estimated cost of materials, labor
and equipment rental throughout 160 calendar days is Php
7,309,645.11.
Recommendations
Abendaño M., Racente J., and Barroso J., 2020. Hydrologic Model for Flooding
in Manupali Watershed and Its Implications to Land-Use Policies.
Retrieved from Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences -
Special Edition.
Bencheikh, G., Chiron, P., & Tahiri, A. (2017). A Flood Decrease Strategy
Based on Flow Network Coupled with a Hydraulic Simulation Software.
IFAC
PapersOnLine, 50-2, 3171-3176. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.337
Chin, D.A. (2019). Estimating peak runoff rates using the rational method.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 145 (6).
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001387
Cipollini, S., Fiori, A., & Volpi, E. (2021). Structure-based framework for the
design and risk assessment of hydraulic structures, with application to
offline flood detention basins. Journal of Hydrology, 600, 126527.
Florencondia, N.T., Gener, S.S., & Jocson, J.C. (2019). Flood Prevention and
Mitigation Initiatives towards a Flood-Free City. American Scientific
Research
Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 58(1), 215-224.
Retrieved
from http://asrjetsjournal.org/
Gao, C., Liu, J., & Wang, Z. (2013). An Ecological Flood Control System in
Phoenix Island of Huzhou, China: Case Study. Water Journal, 5, 1457-
1471. doi:10.3390/w5041457.
Handajani, N., Masono, L.B., Wahjudijanto, I., & Trilita. M.N. (2018). Flood
Control Using Polders Case Study: Watershed of Sadar River,
32
Lagmay, A. M., Mendoza, J., Cipriano, F., Delmendo, P. A., Lacsamana, M.N.,
Moises, M. A., & Tingin, N. E. (2017). Street floods in Metro Manila and
possible solutions. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 59, 39-47.
McEnroe, B.M., Rome, A.C., & Young, B.C. (2009). Empirical determination of
rational method runoff coefficients. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14
(12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000114
Siviglia A., Stocchino A., and Colombini M., 2009. Case Study: Design of Flood
Control Systems on the Vara River by Numerical and Physical Modeling.
Retrieved from Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228950503.
Wang, H. & Wang, S. (2018). Extending the Rational Method for assessing and
developing sustainable urban drainage systems. Water Research, 144,
112-125, ISSN 0043-1354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.022.
Appendix A
Itemized Budget
Each group member contributed Php 1,000, for a total budget of Php
6,000, excluding transportation costs. The budget period is from February 21,
2022, to May 15, 2022. The laboratory testing and operations expenses are
listed below (see Table 2), for a total cost of Php 7,457.00. The laboratory test
was performed in Allied Material Testing Lab - Malaybalay Branch.
Operating Expenses
Cost (Php)
Paper Presentation 470.00
Meal 2,730.00
Field Data Collection 100.00
Transportation 3,000.00
Other Materials 430.00
Total 6,730.00
Appendix B
Appendix C
Letter to CDRRMO-Malaybalay
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
Program of Works
51
APPENDIX F
APPENDIX G
Documentation