Module 8 Inferential Statistics NonParametric Test
Module 8 Inferential Statistics NonParametric Test
In this module, you will be learning about inferential statistics under the non-
parametric test. Non-parametric test is usually used to test the relationship between or among
variables or if there is a significant difference between or among variables if the distribution of
the gathered data is not normally distributed. In other words, nonparametric tests are tests that
do not required a normal distribution.
Learning Objectives:
What are the limitations of nonparametric test? The following are the limitations of the
nonparametric test.
1. Nonparametric tests are usually less powerful than corresponding tests
designed for use on data that come from a specific distribution. Thus, it is less likely to reject
the null hypothesis when it is false.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 1
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
2. Nonparametric tests often require modifying the hypotheses.
Nonparametric test is used when the distribution is abnormal that is when the skewness is
either positive or negative and the kurtosis is greater than or less than 0.265. It is also used
when the level of measurement is expressed in ordinal or nominal data.
Some of the most commonly used test statistics under the nonparametric test are as
follows:
One of the most commonly used tests under nonparametric test is the “Chi-Square
Test” and it is denoted by the symbol 2 . It is used to test the significance for data presented
in frequencies or nominal forms. This is a test of difference between the observed and
expected frequencies. The chi-square is considered a unique test due to its function; test of
goodness-of-fit and test of independence.
The Manager of a certain Bookstore decided to find out whether the computer books
have an equal selling in a week. See the table below. Determine if there is a significant
difference in the number of Computer books sold in a week. Use the 0.05 level of significance.
Solution:
Problem: Is there any significant difference in the number of Computer books sold in
a week?
1. Hypotheses:
2. Level of Significance:
4. Decision Rule:
If the computed chi-square is greater than the chi-square tabular value, reject the
null hypothesis.
5. Conclusion: Since the computed chi-square of 7.092 is less than the chi-square tabular
value of 9.49 at 0.05 level of significance with 4 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis
will be accepted. Thus, there is no significant difference in the number of Computer books
sold in a week.
Now, let’s use the SPSS to run the chi-square test for goodness of fit.
Step 1. On the menu bar, look for the “Analyze” and proceed to “Non-parametric Tests”,
then look the “Legacy Dialogs” and click the first item which is the “Chi-square”.
Transfer the data (from this example is the “Title of Computer Books”) into the “Test
Variable List” by clicking the arrow to the right.
Here in the output window, you could see the summary statistics. In test statistics, the
numerical values that you could see here are important numbers which are very important in
analyzing the data where you could report that the computed chi-square is 7.091 with a degree of
freedom of 4 and the p-value (Assymp. Sig.) of 0.131 is greater than the critical value of 0.05 thus,
there is no significant difference in the number of Computer books sold in a week.
If we want to test if there is a significant relationship between the two variables, the chi-
square test of independence can be used.
The computation for the chi-square test for independence is similar to the test of goodness-
of-fit. The following steps will help us to be able to determine if the two variables have a significant
relationship.
Where:
R is the row total
C is the column total
N is the grand total
5. Interpret the result whether you are going to accept or reject the null hypothesis using
the table for chi-square.
Decision Rule: If the computed chi-square is greater than the tabular value, reject the
null hypothesis and confirm the alternative hypothesis. With this, we can draw a conclusion for
variables under investigation.
Test if there is a significant relationship between the respondents’ sex and their voting
preference. Use ∝ = 0.05 as level of significance.
1. State the Problem: Is there a significant relationship between the respondents’ sex and
their voting preference?
Ho: There is no significant relationship between the respondents’ sex and their voting
preference.
Ha: There is a significant relationship between the respondents’ sex and their voting
preference.
∝ = 0.05
df = (c -1)(r-1) = ( 3 – 1)(2 – 1) = 2
Decision Rule: If the computed chi-square is greater than the tabular value
rejects the null hypothesis and accepts the alternative hypothesis.
Analysis and Conclusion: Since the computed chi-square of 5.466 is less than
the tabular value of 5.99 with 0.05 levels of significance and df of 2, we are not going to reject
the null hypothesis thus there is no significant relationship between the respondents’ sex and their
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 10
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
voting preference. This implies that the respondent’s sex has no relationship on their voting
preference.
Test if there is a significant relationship between the respondents’ sex and their
voting preference. Use ∝ = 0.05 as level of significance.
Ha: There is significant difference between the respondents’ sex and their
favorable response in divorce.
(250)(95)
𝐸45 = 420
= 56.55
(170)(95)
𝐸50 = = 38.45
420
(250)(325)
𝐸205 = = 193.45
420
(170)(325)
𝐸120 = = 131.55
420
4. Decision Rule:
If the computed chi-square is greater than the tabular value rejects the null hypothesis and
accepts the alternative hypothesis.
Since the computed chi-square of 7.53 is greater than the tabular value of 3.84 with 0.05
levels of significance and df of 1, reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.
This implies that the respondent’s sex has a significant difference on the favorable response
whether they are in favor or not in favor to divorce.
In doing the chi-square test of independence in SPSS, it is quite different from the chi-square
test of goodness-of-fit. Assuming that we already encoded our needed data.
To show this on how to treat the two groups of data in both categorical variables, we will be
using our previous data on the first example under this statistics test and it needs to follow these
steps.
Step 1. In the menu bar of SPSS, look at “Analyze”, then “Descriptive Statistics” and
proceed to “Crosstabs”.
Transfer your data in a “Row(s)” box and in a “Column(s)” box. In our previous example
on this test statistics, the row data is “Sex” while the column data is the “Voting Preferences”. So,
highlight each categorical variable and place it in an appropriate box with the use of an arrow to
the right.
Step 4. Once you return to the original dialog box, you need to click the “cell” in order to
proceed to another dialog box which is “Crosstabs: Cell Display”. On this dialog box, the default
count is “observed” so we need to check the “expected” then click “continue”.
In addition, a bar chart for this data will also appear. This graph could help you to picture
what really happened in our data and this could be additional information in analyzing the set of
data.
Practice Exercises
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit and Test of Independence
1. The Local Government Unit of a particular place in the Philippines wants to find out
whether the Covid vaccine has an equal rolling out in a week from Monday to Friday of one of the
Barangays in their place. See the table below. Determine if there is a significant difference in the
number of Covid vaccines rolled out in a week. Use the 0.05 level of significance.
2. A random sample of 100 students in the College of Informatics and Computing Sciences
are classified according to sex and asked their opinion if they are favor or not regarding the
implementation on the hair cut policy of the University. The following data were recorded:
Use chi-square test at 0.05 level of significance to test the null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between the opinion of male and female students on the implementation of
haircut policy in the University.
MANN-WHITNEY U TEST
Another equally important test statistic in being able to analyze the data is the Mann-
Whitney U test. This test is also non-parametric or it is said to be that the distribution of data is
non normal or we are unable to assume the normality in both groups of variables. It is also known
as the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and it is a counterpart or it can be used in place of an unpaired t-
test or F-test (ANOVA).
In order to use this test, we need to know the formula for this statistical test. The
formula is illustrated below:
Where:
> U is the Mann-Whitney U (where this be computed separately for group 1 and 2)
> n is the number of observations in each group (the number of observations will be taken
separately say n1 and n2)
> Rank sum is the total rank for each group (where sum of the ranks for each group will be
determined separately, say RS1 and RS2)
So, in the previous formula for Mann-Whitney U test, this could be written as:
Example: A professor gave a final examination to his 20 students, 10 are male and the
remaining students are female. He wants to test if there is a difference in the performance of these
two groups of students. The professor used 0.05 as the level of significance under the two-tailed
test. The following scores are given below:
Research Problem: Is there any significant difference in the performance between male and
female?
Ho: There is no significant difference in the performance between male and female.
Ha: There is a significant difference in the performance between male and female.
Step 3: Decision Rule If the computed U is less than the U critical value, disconfirmed the
null hypothesis.
Note: The decision rule for this test is different from the previous decision where we reject
the Ho if the computed value is greater than the critical value. But in this test, if the computed
value is less than the U-critical value, we need to reject the null hypothesis.
a) Rank the score of students regardless the sex (in a group) from lowest to highest.
b) Make an additional column on the table to place the rank of the score of male and female.
c) Add the ranks for males and also add the ranks for females. d) Compute U for each of the
groups using the formula.
Note: In ranking, it is your choice if you want to rank from lowest to highest or from
highest to lowest.
Computation:
Here, we need to choose a computed U that gives the smaller value. So, our U is 49.
Since the computed Ustat of 49 is greater than the U-critical value of 23 at 0.05 level of
significance, we do not reject the null hypothesis. Hence, there is no significant difference in the
performance between male and female.
How does the Mann-Whitney U test can be used in SPSS? Just like on the previous statistical
test and if you are well versed in using the SPSS, analyzing the data set using this test would be
easy for you. But for those that could be considered as first time SPSS users, the following steps
would be a great help for you.
Of course, we need to have an encoded data set in the data view of SPSS. For discussion
purposes, the previous example would be used. Assuming that the data is already encoded in SPSS.
In doing this test, there are two ways that you could be applied. First is by treating the data and no
need to rank since SPSS will read the ranking and do the computation for you or second, you could
transform the data into rank and still you could get the same output.
Illustration:
Step 1. On the menu bar, look for “Analyze” then “Nonparametric Tests” proceed to
“Legacy Dialogs” and then click the “2 Independent Samples”.
Step 2. Once you click the “2 Independent Samples”, another dialog box will appear.
Transfer the “Score” on the “Test Variable List” with the use of an arrow and the “Sex” on the
“Grouping Variable”. It is seen that the default is in the “Mann-Whitney U”. The “ok” button will
be available once you define the groups on your grouping variable. So, you need to define your
grouping variable, then click “ok”.
You will notice here that the computed Mann-Whitney U which is 49.000 is the same as in
our previous illustration with the use of manual computation as well as the sum of the rank of
female group and the male group. At this point, we could analyze the data that the mean rank of
male and female is quite the same. In being able to prove that there will be no difference between
the mean rank of male and female is by the use of Asymp. Sig (2-tailed) that is equal to 0.939.
Since the p-value of 0.939 is greater than the level of significance of 0.05, we will not reject the
null hypothesis that is “There is no significant difference in the performance between male and
female”.
As what stated before, we could do another way in using this test by transforming the data
into rank. Let us do this with the use of SPSS. Here are the step-by-step procedure on how to do
this in SPSS.
Step 2. Click the “rank cases” and another dialog box will appear.
Step 3. Since the data that we need to rank is the “score”, we will transfer it to the “variable/s
box” with the use of an arrow. On the “Assign Rank 1 to” it is your option to rank it from the
smallest value as your rank 1 or from the largest value. It doesn’t matter if you will rank it from
highest to lowest or on the other way around. Then click “ok”
Step 4. Once you click the “ok” button”, an output view will appear and you will notice that
there will be another column automatically added in the data view.
Step 5: Now, if you want to test the data using the Mann-Whitney U, you will do the same
in our previous illustration but instead of using the “score” we will be using the “rank score”.
Name:_________________________________________ Section:_________________
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Mann-Whitney U Test
The pharmaceutical company wants to determine if the two brands of COVID 19 vaccine
have an equal length of shelf life in terms of number of years and months. Ten samples for each
brand were examined. The data are as follows:
Based on the problem, determine the possible statement as your research problem and
formulate the null and alternative hypotheses. Test the hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance that
the two different brands of vaccine have an equal length of shelf life in terms of years and months.
Do both the manual computation and with the use of SPSS. Note: Use the space provided below
for your computation and analysis.
The Kruskal-Wallis which is known as the H-test is another non-parametric test that can be
used to analyze the data. This was developed by Kruskal and Wallis, that is why the test was named
after them and it could be said a counterpart or an equivalent of a One-Way Analysis of Variance
in parametric tests meaning if we see that the distribution of data is normally distributed, it is better
to use the ANOVA since this test is more powerful compared to this test that we are talking to.
1. As stated previously, we only use this test if the distribution of the data to be treated is
not normal, otherwise it is better to use the F-test.
2. If we want to compare or test if there is a significant difference of three or more than three
groups.
3. The variances are not equal and the level of measurement of data is ordinal scale (rank
data).
Where:
In order to perform and apply the formula, the step-by-step procedure is listed below.
Step 1: Rank the data. You can do the ranking from lowest to highest or from highest to
lowest and all of the data must be ranked regardless what group it belongs to. You have an option
when it comes to ranking the data.
Step 2: On the prepared table for your group of data, say you have three groups, meaning
there are three columns, four groups there will be four columns, etc., you will add a column to the
right of each column group so that you could place the assigned rank for each data in every group
column.
Step 3: Take the sum of the rank of the respective columns ranks of each group that will
serve as your ΣR1, ΣR2, ΣR3, …, Σ Rn.
Research Problem: Is there any significant difference in the mean grade of the students using
the three different methods of teaching?
Ho: There is no significant difference in the mean grade of the students using the three
different methods of teaching.
Ha: There is a significant difference in the mean grade of the students using the three
different methods of teaching.
Step 3: Decision: If the computed Kruskal-Wallis test or H is greater than the critical value,
reject the null hypothesis.
Just like in our previous test statistics with the aid of SPSS, we must see to it that the data to
be treated is not normally distributed. In order to show how to use SPSS for this kind of test, these
are the following steps prior to treating the data using the H-test. Our assumption is that the data
is pre-encoded or there is data already encoded in the variable view of the SPSS.
Step 2: Click the “K Independent Samples”, and once you click this, another dialog box will
appear.
Step 4. If you click the continue button, you will go back to the previous dialog box. You
need to click the “Define Range” button since you will be declaring your three (3) grouping
variables and in this case the three different methods of teaching. Put 1 as the minimum and 3 as
the maximum. Then click continue.
Step 5: Once you click “ok” an output window will now appear.
Now, from here, we could do the analysis and draw the conclusion.
Analysis: The mean rank of the students’ final grade for the three different methods of
teaching such as virtual online, face to face and modular approach is 9.08, 15.08 and 4.33
respectively with the number of observations of 6 for each method. Since the p-value of 0.002 is
less than the level of significance of 0.05 with the degrees of freedom of 2 at 0.05 level of
significance, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Conclusion: Therefore, there is a significant difference in the mean grade of the students
using the three different methods of teaching.
Name:____________________________________ Section:_________________
Date:_____________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Kruskal-Wallis or H Test
Direction: Use the Kruskal-Wallis H test to solve the problem below. Initially, a farmer
planted an equal height of fruit bearing baby tree in a common quality of soil. He grouped the
plants into four groups where each group was treated by a fertilizer of different brands. Group A,
B, C, D plants are treated with brand A, B, C and D fertilizer respectively. After a month, the
farmer measures the height of the plants individually and the data are recorded below. All
measurements are in centimeters.
Test the hypothesis if there is a significant difference of the height of three treating different
kinds of fertilizers. Use 0.05 at level significance. Do this both with manual computation and with
the use of SPSS.
This statistical test is another tool under the non-parametric test. The sign test for two
independent samples is also known as the median test of two sample cases. If in t-test, we compare
the mean of two groups, here in this test statistics, we basically compare the median of the two
independent samples or two independent groups in a categorical or numerical variable known as
the grouping variable. So, the counterpart of this test under parametric test is the student t-test or
simply t-test.
If we want to compare the median of two independent groups and the distribution of the data
on these groups are not normally distributed, this test is the appropriate statistical test to use. Also,
the data should be in a numerical data (interval and ratio scale) or in categorical scale (nominal
and ordinal scale) and an example is just like in the Likert-scale.
If you wish to test if there is a significant difference between the two independent groups or
if you want to know whether the median score of the first group, say group A is significantly
different or not with the second group, say group B, this test statistic is the appropriate test to use.
The formula for this test is given below.
Where;
𝑋2 Chi-square test
a = the number of positive observations in the first row
b = the number of negative observations in the first row
c = the number of positive observations in the second row
d = the number of negative observations in the second row
a+b = the row total on the first row
c+d = the row total on the second row
a+c = the column total on the first column
b+d = the column total on the second column
n = the grand total
SCORE
MALE FEMALE
6 10
4 8
3 10
6 5
5 7
3 9
5 5
8 6
4 8
3 2
5 8
7
7
But before we do the steps for hypothesis testing, the first thing we do is to arrange the data
(all scores) from lowest to highest and look for the median.
For this data, the median is 6. To translate each score whether it is positive or negative, if
the score is above the median, it is positive (+) but if the score is equal or below median, it is
negative (-).
SCORE SIGN
MALE FEMALE SIGN FOR MALE SIGN FOR FEMALE
6 10 - +
4 8 - +
3 10 - +
6 5 - -
5 7 - +
3 9 - +
5 5 - -
8 6 + -
4 8 - +
3 2 - -
5 8 - +
7 +
7 +
Let us now do the steps in hypothesis testing. The research problem would be, “Is there any
significant difference in the performance of male and female students in Data Analysis?”
Ho: There is no significant difference in the quiz performance between male and female.
Ha: There is a significant difference in the quiz performance between male and female.
Step 2. Criterion
Step 5. Analysis and Conclusion Since the computed chi-square of 8.866 is greater than the
critical chi-square value of 3.841 at 0.05 level of significance with a degree of freedom of 1, we
have to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we could say that there is a significant difference in
the quiz performance of male and females in Data Analysis.
At this point, we will be using SPSS to test the hypothesis if the median of two independent
variables or groups is statistically significant or not. First, we need to encode all the data that are
necessary for the test. For presentation purposes, we will be using our previous hypothetical data
for this statistical test.
Step 1. In the menu bar, place the cursor on “Analyze” and drop down to “Nonparametric
Tests”, then the “Legacy Dialogs” and proceed and click the “2 Independent Samples”.
Step 2. Once you click the “2 Independent Samples” another dialog box will appear. As you
see the dialog box, transfer “score” in the test variable list and the “sex” into grouping variable
and then define the range. But make it sure that you choose the “median” as the test type.
Step 4. After clicking on the “continue” button, it will return to the dialog box of “Test for
Several Independent Samples” and then click the ok button. Once you click it, the output view will
appear.
For this illustration, we can conclude that since the p-value of 0.005 is less than the level of
significance of 0.05, we will reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis that
there is a significant difference between the score of males and females.
Step 1. In the menu bar, place the cursor on “Analyze” and drop down to “Nonparametric
Tests”, and click the “Independent Samples”.
Step 2. As you click the “Independent Samples”, another dialog box appears and it will ask
you what is your objective? With this, you will click the button “Compare medians across groups”.
After clicking this, proceed to the “run” button and click this.
Step 3. Highlight your data and transfer it to the appropriate box with the use of an arrow.
In this presentation, transfer the “sex” variable into groups while the “score in quiz” into the test
fields and then click the run button.
Step 4. Once you click the run button, an output view will appear.
On this output view, we could now make our analysis and conclusion. Since the computed
chi-square (test statistic) of 8.866 with a median of 6 and degree of freedom of 1 where p-value of
0.005 is less than the level of significance of 0.05, we will reject the null hypothesis in favor of
the alternative hypothesis. This means that the performance of male and female in the quiz in Data
Analysis is statistically significant.
Section:________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Median Test Two-Sample Case or Sign Test for Two Independent Samples
Directions: Use the sign test for two independent samples in this set of data both manual
computation and with the use of SPSS. Analyze and make a conclusion about it.
Determine whether there is a significant difference or not between the male and female
based on the given data below in the number of hours on the usage of social media in a
day. The data are as follows:
What is a Fisher Sign test or known as Sign test for Correlated samples?
A Fisher Sign test is another test statistic under non parametric. This is also known
as the Sign Test for correlated samples and this test is the counterpart of the paired t-test or t-test for
correlated samples under parametric test and it is one of the easiest to perform. When we talk about
Fisher Sign test, we are dealing with two parameters that are being considered and tested in one sample
group or it simply compares two correlated samples or the data is in n-paired observations.
We use this test if you need to test if there is a difference between each pair
(dependent) of observations that are being tested or this test according to Broto is based on the idea
that half the difference between the paired observations will be positive and the other half will be
negative. This test is the counterpart of the t-test for one sample group or paired t-test in parametric
test and the level of data that are being treated with the use of this test are ordered categorical data
where a numerical scale is inappropriate but where it is possible to rank the observations or it can be
used if the data is continuous numeric.
The formula for Fisher Sign test or Sign Test for Correlated Samples is given below.
Where:
D = difference between the number of positive or plus signs (+) and the number of negative or minus
signs (-). So, D = (number of + sign) - (number of - sign)
What are the steps in performing a Sign Test for Correlated Samples?
Listed below are the steps on how you will perform or use this test and as we all know;
we need to have a research problem before we do the hypothesis testing.
1. Make a table for the gathered data. First column is for the individual observations
and the second column and third column would be the paired data to be tested.
2. The fourth column for the table is for the determination of the sign for each pair
of observations. Note. In counting the number of positive and negative, zero
would not be included in the count.
3. Then do the hypothesis testing and apply it into the formula. The computed value
should be compared to the critical value in being able to know if you will accept
or reject the null hypothesis.
During the first day of class, a professor conducted a 50-item pre-test to his fifteen
(15) students in Statistics and Probability before the formal lesson started on the said subject. After
a semester, he gave a posttest to his fifteen students using the same set of examinations that he was
given in the pretest. He wants to determine if there is a significant difference between the pretest
and the posttest. The following is the result of the experiment and he used the sign test for
correlated samples. The professor uses the α = 0.05 level of significance.
Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Pre-test 15 12 20 10 8 27 29 13 19 22 25 14 28 18 16
Post-test 20 18 25 25 20 35 43 28 29 37 46 27 33 37 28
Research Problem: Is there a significant difference between the Pretest and Posttest
of the fifteen students in Statistics and Probability on the use of the teaching method by the
Professor?
Step 2. Criterion
Since the computed value of z = 1.33 is less than the tabular value of
1.96, we confirmed the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference on the pre-test
and post-test. Therefore, there is no significant difference in the performance of fifteen
students on their pre-test and post-test in Statistics and Probability.
Just like what we did in the other test statistics, we could apply this test to test the
hypothesis if there is a significant difference or not by simply treating the data through the
“Analysis” on the main menu bar. Likewise, there should be of course encoded data that are
being tested or treated.
To do this, let us use the previous data given on this kind of test statistics. Assuming that
there is already data which are being encoded.
Step 2. Once you click it, you will see another dialog box.
Step 3. Transfer your independent variable (Pre-test) into “Test Pairs” under
variable 1 and your dependent variable (Post-test) in variable 2 using the
arrow. Wilcoxon is the default test statistic. Uncheck it and check the “Sign” as your
test statistics. If you want to have descriptive information, click the “option” and check
the “Descriptive”.
So, at this point, you can now do your analysis of your data.
Based on your output view, there are 15 students who took the pre-test and post-
test. There are 4 under the negative differences, 10 for positive differences and 1 for ties. The
p-value of 0.180 is greater than the level of significance of 0.05, hence we need to accept the
null hypothesis. Thus, there is no significant difference between the pre-test and the post-test.
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Signed Test for Correlated Sample
Direction: Given the data below, use the signed test for correlated sample both manual
computation and with the use of statistical software (SPSS) then analyze and interpret the result.
Participants A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Before Feeding 20 14 22 16 24 18 20 24 16 13 24 18 22 25 17
Program
After a year of 23 18 20 22 20 20 21 23 23 15 23 20 24 23 20
Feeding
Program
Basically, this test is just an extension of the Sign Test for two independents
samples. This is also a non-parametric test that compares the medians of a quantitative
variable of two or more groups. This test is a counterpart of analysis of variance for
independent samples or this could be a special case of a chi-square for independence.
In order to apply this test, the formula for the chi-square test will be used but the
contingency table must be in a 2 x k table, where 2 represents the above and below
median and k is the number of independent groups.
As previously stated, this test is a special case of a chi-square test for independence,
thus the formula that we are going to use is similar in the chi-square. Below is the formula
for chi-square so that there is no need to go back to our previous topic of chi-square.
Just like in our previous lesson about chi-square test for independence, in being able
to use this test statistics (sign test for k-independent sample), simply do the same on what
you do in the chi-square test.
Example:
Research Problem:
Is there a significant difference in the number of sales in a week of a particular brand of cloth
in three different ways of selling?
Step 1. Hypothesis
Step 2. Criterion
If the computed chi-square is greater than the critical value, reject the null
hypothesis.
Step 4. Computation
First, determine the median of all data regardless of the place of selling. Here, the
median is 18. Then make a table. The data falls below or at the median will be
negative (-) and data which are above the median will be positive (+).
(7)(9)/21 = 3 (7)(12)/21 = 4
(7)(9)/21 = 3 (7)(12)/21 = 4
(7)(9)/21 = 3 (7)(12)/21 = 4
Since the computed value for chi-square (sign test for k-independent sample) of
4.67 is less than the critical or tabular value of chi-square of 5.991 at 0.05 level of
significance, we will be confirming the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is no significant
difference in the number of sales in a week of a particular brand of cloth in three different
ways or places of selling.
Doing this test statistics manually is very tedious and time consuming for the
researcher. SPSS will make it easier to compute this test statistic as long as you know
how to use this software. Let us do this test statistics using the SPSS using the previous
data.
Step 1. Based on the above data set, go to “Analyze” then down the cursor to
“Nonparametric Tests”, proceed to the “Legacy Dialogs” then move the cursor to “K
independent Samples” and click it.
Highlight and transfer the “Number of Sales” into the “Test Variable List” and
the “Way of Selling” on the “Grouping Variable” using the arrow right.
Here, you will type 1 as the minimum and 3 as the maximum since there are three
different ways of selling as our grouping variable, then click continue.
Step 4. Once you click the continue button, it will go back to the previous dialog
box. You will notice that the default statistical test is the “Kruskal-Wallis H”. What you
are going to do is to uncheck it and check the square on the “Median” and then click the
ok button.
From here you can now start doing your analysis, interpretation and conclusion
based on the treated data.
Since the p-value (Asym. Sig.) of 0.097 is greater than the 0.05 level of
significance at median is 18 with a chi-square value of 4.667 and a degree of freedom
of 2, do not reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is no significant difference in
the number of sales in a week of a particular brand of cloth in three different ways or
places of selling.
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Signed Test for K-Independent Group
Direction: Given the data below, use the signed test for K-independent group both manual
computation and with the use of statistical software (SPSS) then analyze and interpret the result.
In order to apply this test statistics, make it sure that your data should be ordinal,
interval or ratio (turned into rank). But basically, we could use this test if one or both
variables is ordinal (rather than interval or ratio) In order to understand these test statistics,
we need to know what is the meaning of monotonic function. For sure your question
would be, “What is this function?” A monotonic function is one that either never increases
or never decreases as its independent variable increases. There are three kinds of
monotonic function. One is monotonically increasing, the second is monotonically
decreasing and the third is not monotonic. When we say monotonically increasing, as x
increases the y also increases. The monotonically decreasing is that as the x variable
increases, the y variable decreases and the not monotonic is that as the x variable increases
the y variable sometimes decreases and sometimes increases.
In other words, we use this test in order to measure the strength and direction of
the monotonic between two continuous or ordinal variables like in Likert scale.
The value of spearman rank correlation coefficient, the r, is basically ranging from
-1 to 0 to 1 or if the value is negative, just simply take its absolute value and we could
verbally interpret these values are as follows:
Here is the step-by-step procedure on how to perform the Spearman rank order
correlation.
Step 1. Find the rank of the scores/data for each variable from highest to lowest.
Step 2. Look for the difference of the rank of the first variable to the second
variable for each observation.
Step 4. Take the summation of the difference of the two variables that are squared.
Note: It is important that in doing this test statistics manually, we need to create
a table for this.
Example: A health professor wants to determine if the height and weight of his
fifteen (15) students are correlated to each other. He calculated the correlation coefficient
using Spearman rank order correlation at 0.05 level of significance. The data are as
follows:
Student Weight Height
ID (kg) (cm)
1 72 172
2 62 169
3 58 167
4 75 195
5 43 155
6 70 182
7 56 151
8 59 167
9 41 157
10 49 163
11 77 188
12 60 179
13 50 172
14 45 160
15 63 189
Step 2. Criterion
Step 3. Decision Rule If the computed value of rs is greater than the critical value
rs at 0.05 level of significance, reject the null hypothesis.
Step 4: Computation: Rank the data from highest to lowest as 1 is the highest
rank.
The rs value that is 0.843 indicates that there is a very strong positive correlation
and since this value is greater than the critical value of 0.538 at 0.05 level of significance,
we reject the null hypothesis. Hence, there is a significant relationship between the
student’s height and weight. It implies that as the height of the student increases, the
weight is also increased.
For sure, you will be saying that it is more convenient to use SPSS if you want to
use test statistics since the SPSS does the computation. But still, it is in your hand to get
the right test statistics. Even if the SPSS could do the computation, the output will be
based on the input you do.
Again, if you are going to use the software, make sure that you are already familiar
with its interface and how to explore it. You should have to encode the proper data set in
the data editor before treating and analyzing the data. So, let us apply SPSS by following
the steps on how to deal with these statistics, the Spearman Rank-Order of Correlation.
For presentation purposes, we will be using the previous data under this test
statistics.
Step 1. In the menu bar, look for “Analyze” and drop down the cursor to
“Correlate” then click the “Bivariate”.
Step 3. Place the two groups of data into the variable window by highlighting each
data and click the arrow. Also, unclick the “Pearson” and click the small box on the
“Spearman” then click the “ok” button.
Step 4. Once the “ok” button is clicked, an output view will be displayed.
As you can see, the correlation coefficient of 0.843 tells us that the two
independent groups of variables have a positive strong association or correlation where
the p-value, Sig. (2-tailed) is less than the level of significance 0.05 and 0.01. Meaning,
we need to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Hence, there
is a significant relationship between the student’s height and weight. It implies that as the
height of the student increases, the weight is also increased.
Alternative Way on How to Use SPSS for Spearman Rank Order Correlation
For sure you will be asking, “If this is the test that we are going to use, where is
the ranking?” Another way to test its significant relationship is with the use of ranking.
We could also use this test in SPSS even if we rank the data set. In order to do that, we
need to rank first the data of each group of data.
Step 1. In the menu bar, look for the “Transform” and drop down the cursor to
“Rank Cases”.
Step 3. On the rank cases dialog box, move the two data sets on the window
variable by highlighting it and click the arrow for this.
Before clicking on the “ok” button, make sure that you choose the assigned rank
whether you are going to rank the data from smallest to largest or vice versa. Here in our
example, the ranking from largest to smallest was chosen, then click ok.
Step 5. In analyzing the data, we will be adopting the steps in our previous
presentation but instead of using the data set, we will be using the data set that is being
ranked and then click “ok”.
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Spearman Rank Correlation
Direction: Use the spearman rank correlation to analyse and interpret the data below,
using both manual calculation and statistical software (SPSS).
The waistline and neckline (measured in inches) of a sample of students from one of the
university's colleges are being compared to see if there is any correlation. The data are listed below,
with 0.05 being the level of significance used by the researcher.
Students A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Waistline 35 34 29 30 33 29 35 36 28 34 28 33 33 29 30
Neckline 15 18 10 18 16 13 14 18 13 13 18 16 14 15 18
What is the Friedman Test and how will deal with this test?
For sure you will ask what is your k as treatment and b as the block. For example,
there are 8 individual observations who are subject to be treated in 4 different methods of
teaching and learning. For this example, k is the number of different methods of teaching
and learning and the b is the number of observations that serve as the number of blocks.
Step 1. Label the treatments as k (If there are 3 treatments, k = 3. If there are 4
different treatments, k = 4, and so on) and the b as the number of blocks is the number of
samples subject for testing.
Step 2. Do the ranking for each block. Meaning, the data for different treatments
in one particular observation will be ranked from highest to lowest.
Step 3. After determining the ranks for each block of different treatments, take the
sum of the rank per treatment or separately and label this as T 1 , T2 , … Tn , where T1 is
the first treatment, T2 is the second treatment up to the Tn and this is the nth treatment.
Do this step in the prepared table. After this, we could proceed now to the
computation of the Friedman Fr test.
What is the formula for this test statistics? The formula for the Friedman test is
given below.
Where:
Example. Five students are subject to a test if there are significant differences in
their level of acceptance on the four different designs of computers in the 1970s, 1980s,
1990s and in the 2000s. The level of acceptance in a 5-likert scale is 1 is unacceptable, 2
is slightly unacceptable, 3 is undecided, 4 is slightly acceptable and 5 is acceptable. The
responses of the five students are given below. Use 0.05 as the level of significance to
test whether there is a significant difference of 5 students on their level of acceptance of
computer designs for the said four years.
Step 1. Hypothesis
Degree of freedom = df = k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3
If the computed value is greater than the critical value, reject the null
hypothesis.
Step 4. Computation: Note that ranking is from the lowest grade to highest.
Since the computed value for Fr which is 5.88 is less than the critical value for
chi-square of 7.815 at 0.05 level of significance at degree of freedom of 3, do not reject
the null hypothesis. Hence, the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in the
level of acceptance of five (5) students on computer design to four (4) different years was
confirmed.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 86
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Using SPSS for this test statistics is not as difficult as you think. If you really have
a strong knowledge on how to explore SPSS, just like what you did to other test statistics,
for sure you could do this in a very simple manner.
Let us use the previous data under this test statistics with the use of SPSS. But
make sure that you already encoded the necessary data in the variable and data view of
SPSS. Assuming that you already encoded all the necessary data, this could be the
environment.
Here is the step-by-step procedure on how to apply SPSS for this test statistics.
Step 2. Once you click the “K-related Samples”, a dialog box will appear. This
dialog box is the “Test for Several Samples”. Note: You will notice that the default test
statistics here is the Friedman Test. In this dialog box, you will need to click the “Statistics”
button first.
Step 3. After clicking the “Statistics” button, another dialog box will pop-up and
you need to check the “Descriptive” part. After doing this, just simply hit the “continue”
button and it will bring back to previous dialog box.
After clicking the “Ok” button, the SPSS will give you an output.
At this point, we can now make our analysis and interpretation. Based on this
output, instead of using the critical value, we will be using the p-value in able to make a
conclusion. Here, the p-value of 0.118 is greater than the level of significant 0.05, hence,
we will confirm the Ho, that is that there is no significant difference in the level of
acceptance of five (5) students on computer design to four (4) different years.
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Friedman Test
Direction: Use Friedman test to analyse and interpret the data below, using both manual
calculation and statistical software (SPSS).
If there are significant differences in the level of acceptance of the three various teaching
approaches—pure online, face-to-face, and mixed learning—among the chosen students, they are
put to a test. On a 5-likert scale, the levels of acceptability are as follows: 1, slightly unacceptable,
2, indecisive, 4, slightly acceptable, and 5, acceptable. The students' responses are listed below.
To determine whether there is a significant difference between the levels of acceptability of the
selected students for the various teaching techniques, use a significance threshold of 0.05.
Another equally important test statistics under the nonparametric test is known as the
McNemar test for correlated proportion. This test is similar to the chi-square test. The only
difference from this is that the McNemar test only have a 2 x 2 contingency table meaning
this test is a before and after design which is tested whether there is a significant difference
between the before and after event. In short, this test compares the proportions for two
correlated dichotomous variables.
In addition, this test has always a one (1) degree of freedom since it used a 2 x 2
contingency table hence the chi-square tabular value for this df is 3.841 at 0.05 level of
significance. If you will be using different level of significance, let us say 0.01, you will need
to use the critical value table or known as the percentage points of chi-square distribution.
What is the formula for McNemar Test for Two Correlated Proportions?
2
(𝑏 − 𝑐)2
𝑥 =
𝑏+𝑐
Where:
X2 is the chi-square
b is the first cell of the second column in the 2x2 table
c is the first cell of the second row in a 2 x 2 table
So, an example for the table using this test would be look like this.
After Total
Before A B A+B
C D C+D
Total A+C B+D Grand Total
2
(𝑏 − 𝑐)2
𝑥 =
𝑏+𝑐
2
(5 − 9)2 (−4)2
𝑥 = = = 1.143
5+9 14
Step 4. Decision Rule
If the computed chi-square is greater than the tabular value, reject the
Ho, otherwise do not reject.
Step 5. Conclusion
Since the computed value of chi-square which is 1.143 is less than the
tabular value of 3.841 at 0.05 level of significance with a degree of freedom of 1, the null
hypothesis would not be rejected. Therefore, there is no significant difference in the use of
two different method of teaching in the passing of student in an examination.
Using our previous, let us say the data were already encoded in the SPSS.
Step 4. On the previous dialog box, click statistics and check the box of McNemar
then click the continue button.
Step 5. Once you click continue, it will return to the “crosstab” dialog box. Here,
click the “cells” and another dialog box will appear. This time check the “observe”,
“expected”, the “row” and “column” under the percentage and then click continue.
After clicking “continue” button, SPSS will send you to its output window.
At this point, we could now analyze and interpret the result. As stated before,
here in SPSS, the value of McNemar test will not be displayed. However, the cross-tabulation
as well as the p-value will be given by this software. Based on the result of p-value which is
0.424 is higher than the level of significant of 0.05. Hence, the null hypothesis will not be
rejected that is there is no significant difference in the use of two different method of teaching
in the passing of student in an examination.
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
McNemar Test for Correlated Proportion
Direction: Use McNemar test to analyse and interpret the data below, using both manual
calculation and statistical software (SPSS).
Following is information about the policy on male students' hair cuts, both before and
after a discussion among school officials. Set the level of significance to 0.05. Use the
statistical test indicated above to determine whether the discussion of the hair cut policy will
alter the opinions of male students.
After Discussion
Before Response Yes No Total
Discussion Yes 19 26 45
No 28 27 55
Total 47 53 100
Are you fond of watching cultural competitions in your school like dancing, singing,
poster making contests, etc. even watching beauty pageants for male and female students?
Usually, if there are competitions to be held in your school, the organizer of whatever event
it is, they are inviting judges in order to rate the performance of the participants and determine
who will be the winner. But, have you asked yourself how these groups of judges agreed or
conformed based on their ratings given to the participants? To answer this question, there is
another non-parametric test in statistics that is able to analyze and interpret the gathered
numerical information is the Kendall Tau Coefficient of Concordance W.
Another question that could come to your mind is, “How can I interpret the value of
W?” In previous test statistics like Pearson-r, we interpret the value of this statistics as perfect
positive or negative correlation denoted as r = 1 and r = -1 respectively and if there is no
correlation, the value of Pearson-r is zero, that is, r = 0. Here, if the value of W is ranging
from 0 to 1. If W is 0, meaning there is no agreement at all between raters but if W is 1, it
only means that there is a perfect agreement among the raters or judges. Also, we could say
that the higher the value of W, the stronger the association.
The table below presents the level of Kendall Coefficient of Concordance W and its
equivalent verbal interpretation.
Candidates
RATER A B C D E
Judge A 3 5 1 4 2
Judge B 3 5 1 4 2
Judge C 3 5 1 4 2
Judge D 3 5 1 4 2
Judge E 3 5 1 4 2
Column 15 25 5 20 10
Total
The table above represents or considered as perfect agreement. As you can see, all the
rank of each candidate are all equal on five different judges.
Candidates
RATER A B C D E
Judge A 1 2 3 4 5
Judge B 2 3 4 5 1
Judge C 3 4 5 1 2
Judge D 4 5 1 2 3
Judge E 5 1 2 3 4
Column 15 15 15 15 15
Total
As you can see on the above table, their column rank total is the same with all rankings
of the judges being different for each of the candidates. In this case, this is known as a no
agreement or perfect disagreement.
Based on the two previous tables, it is easy to identify or observe if the agreement is a
perfect agreement or no agreement at all. However, not all the ratings of the judges would
look like these two tables. There is a possibility that there will be a great difference from these
two tables when there are ties rank given in a particular object among the raters. How can we
calculate the coefficient of agreement? To do this, we will be using the formula and this is
the Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance W.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 100
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
What is the formula for Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance W?
𝟏𝟐𝑺
𝑾=
𝒎𝟐 (𝑵)(𝑵𝟐 − 𝟏)
Where:
m is the number of judges or the respondents who rank the object or whatever
attributes
Example: One of the student organizations under the College of Informatics and
Computing Sciences conducted an activity called “Search for Best Research Paper
Presentation”. The contest was participated by five pre-selected students and judged by eight
experts in the field of research. The table below is the rank given by the judges among the
five student participants.
Research Problem: Is there an agreement or concordance among the eight (8) judges
on the presentation of five student researchers? Use 0.05 as level of significance.
Step 1. Hypotheses
Ho: There is no agreement or concordance among the eight (8) judges on the
presentation of five (5) student researchers.
Ha: There is an agreement or concordance among the eight (8) judges on the
presentation of five (5) student researchers.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 101
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Step 2. Criterion
a. For each participant, add the rank based on the rank given by the judges
for each participant to get the “sum of ranks”.
b. Add the “sum of ranks” to get the total.
c. Compute for the mean for the “sum of ranks” denoted by 𝑅̅
d. Find the difference between the mean for the “sum of ranks” and the sum
of the ranks of each participant.
e. Square the difference which is denoted by D2.
f. Find the sum of D2.
g. Plug in the formula.
𝟏𝟐𝑺
𝑾=
𝒎𝟐 (𝑵)(𝑵𝟐 − 𝟏)
Step 4. Decision Rule: If the computed value is greater than the tabular value, reject
Ho otherwise do not reject.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 102
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Step 5. Conclusion
Since the computed value of chi-square = 12.70 is greater than the tabular
value of chi-square which is equal to 9.49 at 0.05 level of significance with the degree of
freedom of 4, we reject the null hypothesis. Hence, there is an agreement or concordance
among the eight (8) judges on the presentation of five (5) student researchers.
You may be wondering how the judge’s agreement makes it a perfect agreement and
even no agreement at all. Let us consider two different tables below for five different judges
who rate the performance of five candidates in the question-and-answer portion of a beauty
pageant. Here, 1 is the highest rank and 5 will be the lowest rank.
Just like in our previous test statistics, using SPSS is one of the easiest ways to treat
the data especially if you want to determine Kendall's coefficient of concordance. There are
two ways to determine Kendall's coefficient of concordance in SPSS. The first one is by using
the nonparametric test for related samples and the other one is also in nonparametric test but
this time using the k-related sample under the legacy dialog. Let us use these two ways. The
data to be used is the previous data, the rating of eight judges to five different students in the
“Search for Best Paper Presenter”.
Assuming the data are already encoded in the variable and data view of
SPSS. This would look like.
Variable View
Note that even the data is in rank, the measure of the variable would be still scale
since if the measure would be ordinal, it will not be read by the software.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 103
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Data View
First Option
Step 1: In the menu bar, look for “Analyze” then look for the “Nonparametric Tests”
and proceed to “Related Samples”. Click it and another dialog box will appear.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 104
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Step 2. Once the dialog box for nonparametric tests for two or more related samples
appears, you will see the tab button for “Objective”, “Fields” and “Settings”. First, click the
objective and see if the “Automatically compare observed data to hypothesized” was checked.
If this is ok, proceed to the “Fields” button and click it.
Step 3. After clicking the “Fields” button, on the field box, you could see the data to
be tested. Transfer all the data into the “Test Field” by highlighting the data and transfer it
using the arrow.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 105
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Step 4. After transferring all the data into the test fields, click the “Setting” button.
Here, check the “Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (K-sample) and make it sure the
multiple comparison is “All pairwise”
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 106
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Step 5. Lastly, click the “Run” button. Once it is clicked, the output window will
appear.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 107
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Option 2.
Step 1. In the menu bar, look for “Analyze” then look for the “Nonparametric Tests”
and proceed to “Legacy Dialogs” then to “K Related Samples”. Click it and another dialog
box will appear.
Step 2. Once it enters in the “Test for Several Related Samples”, transfer all the data
into the “Test Variables” by highlighting the data and by clicking the arrow.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 108
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Step 3. When all the data were transferred into the test variable box, check the
“Kendall’s W” in the test type and click the “OK” button.
Now, after clicking the “OK” button, the output window will appear.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 109
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
It shows that the result on both manual competition and with the use of SPSS,
the value of Kendall’s coefficient as well as the value of its chi-square are both the same. At
this stage, it could now make an interpretation and analysis of data to draw a concrete
conclusion.
We could now conclude that since the p-value (Asymp. Sig.) of 0.013 is less
than the level of significance of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative
hypothesis.
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 110
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
Name:_________________________________________ Section:_________________
Date:__________________________________________ Score:__________
Practice Exercises
Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance W
Directions: Use Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance W to analyse and interpret the data
below, using both manual calculation and statistical software (SPSS).
An essay writing competition on how to stop the Covid 19 pandemic was held
by the English Department of the College of Informatics and Computing Sciences of a
particular university. The six participants' works are evaluated by five judges. At a
significance level of 0.05, calculate the concordance coefficient W.
Student Participant
Judge S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
A 2 4 1 6 3 5
B 1 5 2 4 3 6
C 3 6 1 5 2 4
D 3 4 2 6 1 5
E 1 4 3 5 2 6
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 111
MODULE IN MATH 408 – DATA ANALYSIS
References:
https://www.statstutor.ac.uk/resources/uploaded/mannwhitney.pdf
https://psych.unl.edu/psycrs/handcomp/hcmann.PDF
https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/research/ba-teaching-
ebooks/pdf/Mann%20Whitney%20- %20Practical.pdf
https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-statistical-
analyses/mann-whitne y-u-test/
https://www.real-statistics.com/statistics-tables/mann-whitney-table
https://users.sussex.ac.uk/~grahamh/RM1web/Kruskal-Wallis%20Handoout2011.pdf
https://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/viswanathan/Median_Test.html
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470776124.app1
https://www.stat.purdue.edu/~lfindsen/stat503/Table%207%20-%20b.pdf
https://psych.unl.edu/psycrs/handcomp/hcmedian.PDF
https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/correlation-coefficient-
formula/spear man-rank-correlation-definition-calculate/
https://www.google.com/search?q=spearman+rank+order+correlation+table
https://www.statstutor.ac.uk/resources/uploaded/spearmans.pdf
https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/spearmans-rank-order-correlation-
statistical-guide-2. php
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/friedman-test
https://ncss-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp
content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/PASS/Tests_for_Two_Correlated_Proportions-
McNemar_Test.pdf
https://www.slideshare.net/DalagangBigo/kendall-coefficient-of-concordance
https://esjeevanand.uccollege.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/sites/114/2020/08/NON-PARAMTERIC-
TEST-8.pdf
MODULE 8 | DATA ANALYSIS – INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (NONPARAMETRIC) WITH SPPS APPLICATION 112