Advanced Nanomaterials
Advanced Nanomaterials
Advanced Nanomaterials
Synthesis, Properties,
Synthesis, and Applications
Properties, and Applications Thomas
Thomas
This book
Thisisbook
a collection of carefully selected peer-reviewed chapters that showcase the the Kalarikkal
Advanced Nanomaterials
ADVANCED
is a collection of carefully selected peer-reviewed chapters that showcase Kalarikkal
ADVANCED
research of an
research international
of an roster
international of scientists.
roster of It explains
scientists. It nanomaterials
explains with
nanomaterials emphasis
with on
emphasis on Stephan
Stephan
Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
synthesis, characterization, and applications. In thisIn important work, an expert team of ThomasRaneesh
synthesis, characterization, and applications. this important work, an expert team of Raneesh
international
This researchers
bookinternational
is a collection provides
of carefully an exploration
selected peer-reviewed of thechapters
emerging thatnanotechnologies
showcase the that thatKalarikkalHaghi
ADVANCED
researchers provides an exploration of the emerging nanotechnologies Haghi
NANOMATERIALS
are poised
research of to make
areanpoised to the
international nano-revolution
roster become
of scientists. a reality
It explains in the in
nanomaterialsmanufacturing
with emphasis sector. The TheStephan
on sector.
NANOMATERIALS
make the nano-revolution become a reality the manufacturing
synthesis,
authors characterization,
present
authors current
present and
andapplications.
current future In
possible
and future this important
developments
possible work,
developments aninexpert team ofcovering
in nanotechnology,
nanotechnology, covering Raneesh
international
many many researchers
diversediverse provides
areas, areas,
including an exploration
medicine, energy,of the emerging
electronics, nanotechnologies
and agriculture. In that
addition to
including medicine, energy, electronics, and agriculture. In addition to Haghi
NANOMATERIALS
areengineering
poised to make the nano-revolution
aspects, the physics, become and
chemistry, a reality in the manufacturing
biotechnology behind sector.
the The and
fabrication
engineering aspects, the physics, chemistry, and biotechnology behind the fabrication and
authors
devicepresent current
designing areandalso future possible developments in nanotechnology, covering
device designing arediscussed.
also discussed.
many diverse areas, including medicine, energy, electronics, and agriculture. In addition to
Synthesis, Properties,
Synthesis, andand
Properties, Applications
Applications
ADVANCED
ADVANCED NANOMATERIALS
ABOUT
engineering THE
ABOUT EDITORS
THEthe
aspects, EDITORS
physics, chemistry, and biotechnology behind the fabrication and
Dr. Sabu
device Dr.Thomas
designing
Sabuare isalso
thediscussed.
Thomas Director of the School
is the Director of Chemical
of the School Sciences,
of Chemical Mahatma
Sciences, GandhiGandhi
Mahatma University,
University,
Kottayam, India. He is aHe
Professor of polymer sciencescience
and engineering and the Director of the of the
Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
ADVANCED NANOMATERIALS
ABOUT Kottayam,
THE EDITORS India. is a Professor of polymer and engineering and the Director
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at the same at the same
Dr.university.
Sabu Thomas is the Director of the School oforChemical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University,
NANOMATERIALS
synthesis, characterization,
synthesis, and applications of nanophosphors, nanoferrites, nanoferroelctrics,
for Nanoscience andcharacterization,
Nanotechnology,and India,applications of nanophosphors,
as well as Associate Professor innanoferrites,
the School ofnanoferroelctrics,
Pure
nanomultiferroics, nanocomposites, and phase
nanomultiferroics, nanocomposites, and phase transitions. transitions.
and Applied Physics at Mahatma Gandhi University. His current research interests include
A. Manuel
synthesis,A. Stephan
Manuel is aand
characterization,
StephanScientist at the Electrochemical
isapplications
a Scientist ofthe
at nanophosphors, Power
Electrochemical Systems
nanoferrites,
Power Division of the Central
nanoferroelctrics,
Systems Division of the Central
nanomultiferroics,
Electrochemical nanocomposites, and phase transitions.
Electrochemical Research Institute in Tamilnadu, India. He is a life member Society
Research Institute in Tamilnadu, India. He is a life member of the for thefor the
of the Society
Advancement of
A. ManuelAdvancement Electrochemical
Stephan is a Scientist Science and Technology
at the Electrochemical
of Electrochemical Science and Power (SAEST) and
Systems(SAEST)
Technology the Materials
Divisionand
of the Society
theCentral of
Materials Society of Editors
Editors
India.
Sabu Thomas, PhDPhD
Electrochemical
India. Research Institute in Tamilnadu, India. He is a life member of the Society for the
Advancement
B. Raneesh
India.
of
is Electrochemical
B. Raneesh a Research
is a Research
Science
Scholar and
at the
Scholar
Technology
School (SAEST)
of Pureof
at the School and
Pure
and the
Applied Materials
Physics
and Applied
Society ofGandhi
at Mahatma
Physics at Mahatma Gandhi
Editors Sabu Thomas,
University, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
University, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
B. Raneesh is a Research Scholar at the School of Pure and Applied Physics at Mahatma Gandhi
A. K. Haghi, PhD, isPhD,
the author and editor of overof65over
books as wellasaswell
many
SabuNandakumar
Thomas, PhDKalarikkal,
Nandakumar PhDPhD
Kalarikkal,
University,A.Kottayam,
K. Haghi, Kerala, is the author and editor 65 books as published paperspapers
many published in in
variousvarious
A. K.
journals
Haghi, PhD,
and
India.
conference proceedings. Dr. Haghi has received several grants,
journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Haghi has received several grants, consulted
is thecorporations,
author and editor ofaover
consulted for for Nandakumar
A. Manuel Kalarikkal,
A. ManuelStephan, PhD
Stephan,PhDPhD
a number of major
a number of major and is
corporations, and is65
frequent books as well
speaker
a frequent to as many published
national
speaker andpapers
and international
to national in
international
various
a number
journals
audiences.
Chief of
and conference
Since
audiences.
ofthe
major
1983,
Sincehe1983,
corporations,
International
proceedings.
served
he served asDr.
as a professor Haghi
a professor
and isofaChemoinformatics
Journal
hasat
frequent speaker toand
received
at several several
national
several
universities. grants,
He
universities. He
and international
Chemical Engineering
consulted
is currently
and
for Editor-in-
Editor-in-
is currently
Polymers
A. Manuel Stephan, PhD
B. Raneesh
B. Raneesh
Chief of the International Journal of Chemoinformatics and Chemical Engineering and Polymers
audiences.
Research
Chief of the
Since
the Canadian
1983,
Journal
Research
heisserved
and
Journal
International
Research
on
andthe
Journal
aseditorial
is on
of
a professor
the editorial
at several
boards
Chemoinformatics
and Development
of many
boards
and
CenterCenter
universities. He is journals.
of international
currently He
many international
Chemical
of Sciences Engineering
and Cultures
Editor-in-
is aHe
journals.
and
member
Polymers
(CRDCSC),
of
is a member
Montreal,
of B. Raneesh
A. K.A.Haghi, PhDPhD
K. Haghi,
the Canadian Research and Development of Sciences and Cultures (CRDCSC), Montreal,
A. K. Haghi, PhD
Research
Quebec, Journal
Canada.and is on the editorial boards of many international journals. He is a member of
Quebec, Canada.
the Canadian Research and Development Center of Sciences and Cultures (CRDCSC), Montreal,
Quebec, Canada. ISBN:ISBN:
978-1-926895-79-6
978-1-926895-79-6
9 0 0 0900 0 0 0
ISBN: 978-1-926895-79-6
90000
9 7819
926 89
781 57989
926 6 579 6
Edited by
Sabu Thomas, PhD, Nandakumar Kalarikkal, PhD,
A. Manuel Stephan, PhD, B. Raneesh, and A. K. Haghi, PhD
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot
assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication
and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any
copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or
hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information stor-
age or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copy-
right.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that pro-
vides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photo-
copy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com
For information about Apple Academic Press product
http://www.appleacademicpress.com
ABOUT THE EDITORS
B. Raneesh
B. Raneesh is currently working as an Analytical Engineer (HRTEM Division) at Interna-
tional and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi
University, Kottayam, India.
vi About the Editors
A. K. Haghi, PhD
Dr. A. K. Haghi holds a BSc in urban and environmental engineering from The
University of North Carolina (USA); a MSc in mechanical engineering from North
Carolina A&T State University (USA); a DEA in applied mechanics, acoustics and
materials from The Université de Technologie de Compiègne (France); and a PhD in
engineering sciences from Université de Franche-Comté (France). He is the author and
editor of 65 books as well as 1000 published papers in various journals and confer-
ence proceedings. Dr. Haghi has received several grants, consulted for a number of
major corporations, and is a frequent speaker to national and international audiences.
Since 1983, he served as a professor at several universities. He is currently Editor-in-
Chief of the International Journal of Chemoinformatics and Chemical Engineering and
Polymers Research Journal and on the editorial boards of many international journals.
He is a member of the Canadian Research and Development Center of Sciences and
Cultures (CRDCSC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
CONTENTS
P. M. Aneesh
Optoelectronic Devices Laboratory, Department of Physics, Cochin University of Science and Technology,
Kochi, India-682 022.
Present address:School of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Trivandrum
Campus, Trivandrum, India-695016.
A. Balakrishnan
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone and Fax No.: +91-484-2801234
I. Banerjee
Department of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India.
E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]
P. K. Barhai
Department of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Yu. O. Barmenkov
Centro de Investigaciones en Optica, Loma del Bosque 115, Leon 37150, Guanajuato, Mexico,
E-mail: [email protected]
S. K. Bhadra
Fiber Optics and Photonics Division, CSIR-Central Glass & Ceramic Research Institute, 196, Raja S. C.
Mullick Road, Kolkata-700 032, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
B. A. Bhanvase
Chemical Engineering Department, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, 666, Upper Indiranagar,
Bibwewadi, Pune-411037, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
MayankBhushan
Research Scholar, Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Madanjeeth School of Green Energy Technolo-
gies, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.
Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Puducherry-605014, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
R. Biswas
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
E-mail: [email protected],
Telephone and Fax No.: +91-484-2801234
x List of Contributors
A. K. Das
Department of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Laser & Plasma Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai-400085, India.
S. Das
Fiber Optics and Photonics Division, CSIR-Central Glass & Ceramic Research Institute,
196, Raja S. C. Mullick Road, Kolkata-700 032, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Nirmal Ghosh O. S.
Research Scholar, Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Madanjeeth School of Green Energy Technolo-
gies, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.
Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Puducherry-605014, India.
Sandhya Gopalakrishnan
Govt. Dental college, Kottayam, Kerala 686 008, India.
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Univer-
sity, Kottayam, Kerala 686 560, India.
Arvind Gupta
N.S.N. Research Centre for Nanotechnology and Bionanotechnology, SICES College, Jambhul Phata,
Kalyan - Badlapur Road, Ambernath (W), 421505, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
D. V. S. Jain
Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
M. K. Jayaraj
Optoelectronic Devices Laboratory, Department of Physics, Cochin University of Science and Technology,
Kochi, India-682 022.
E-mail: [email protected]
Nanda-kumarKalarikkal
School of Pure and Applied Physics
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Univer-
sity, Kottayam, Kerala 686 560, India.
B. Kalska-Szostko
Institute of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Hurtowa 1, 15-399 Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Physics, University of Bialystok, Lipowa 41, 15-424 Bialystok, Poland.
E-mail: [email protected]
S. E. Karekar
Chemical Engineering Department, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, 666, Upper Indiranagar,
Bibwewadi, Pune-411037, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
T. N. Kim
Department of Materials Engineering, Paichai University, Daejeon, S. Korea-302-735.
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone and Fax No.: +91-484-2801234
A. V. Kir’yanov
Centro de Investigaciones en Optica, Loma del Bosque 115, Leon 37150, Guanajuato, Mexico,
E-mail: [email protected]
A.M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute (Russian Academy of Sciences) Vavilov Str. 38, Moscow 119991,
Russian Federation.
E-mail: [email protected]
List of Contributors xi
Sujith. K
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
Vinod Kumar
Assir specialist dental centre, Abha,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
P. Laha
Department of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Asha Anish Madhavan
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
S. K.Mahapatra
Department of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
A. Martinez-Gamez
Centro de Investigaciones en Optica, Loma del Bosque 115, Leon 37150, Guanajuato, Mexico,
E-mail: [email protected]
J. L. LucioMartíne, Instituto de Fisica de la Universidad de Guanajuato, Loma del Bosque 113, Leon 37150,
Guanajuato, Mexico
E-mail: [email protected]
V. K. Meena
Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (CSIR-CSIO), Chandigarh, India.
BalachandranUnni Nair
Chemical Laboratory, Central Leather Research Institute, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research,
Adyar, Chennai, 600 020 India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: +91 44 2441 1630
Fax. +91 44 2491 1589
Manitha Nair
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
S. V. Nair
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
Marimuthu Nidhin
Chemical Laboratory, Central Leather Research Institute, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research,
Adyar, Chennai, 600 020 India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone No.: +91 44 2441 1630
Fax No.: +91 44 2491 1589
Goldie Oza
N.S.N. Research Centre for Nanotechnology and Bionanotechnology, SICES College, Jambhul Phata,
Kalyan - Badlapur Road, Ambernath (W), 421505, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
M. Pal
Fiber Optics and Photonics Division, CSIR-Central Glass & Ceramic Research Institute,
196, Raja S. C. Mullick Road, Kolkata-700 032, India.
E-mail:[email protected]
xii List of Contributors
A. B. Panda
Department of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Priyanka. P
Amrita centre for Nanosciences and Molecular medicine, Kochi, Kerala, India-682041.
Sunil Pandey
N.S.N. Research Centre for Nanotechnology and Bionanotechnology, SICES College, Jambhul Phata,
Kalyan - Badlapur Road, Ambernath (W), 421505, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
M. C. Paul
Fiber Optics and Photonics Division, CSIR-Central Glass & Ceramic Research Institute, 196, Raja S. C.
Mullick Road, Kolkata-700 032, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
A. Pigiel
Institute of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Hurtowa 1, 15-399 Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Physics, University of Bialystok, Lipowa 41, 15-424 Bialystok, Poland.
E-mail: [email protected]
Indu Raj
Govt. Dental college, Kottayam, Kerala 686 008, India.
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Univer-
sity, Kottayam, Kerala 686 560, India.
B. Raneesh
School of Pure and Applied Physics
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Univer-
sity, Kottayam, Kerala 686 560, India.
M. Rogowska
Institute of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Hurtowa 1, 15-399 Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Physics, University of Bialystok, Lipowa 41, 15-424 Bialystok, Poland.
E-mail: [email protected]
J. K. Sahu
Optoelectronic Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton So17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
E-mail: [email protected]
D. Satula
Institute of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Hurtowa 1, 15-399 Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Physics, University of Bialystok, Lipowa 41, 15-424 Bialystok, Poland.
E-mail: [email protected]
D. S. Schmool
IFIMUP - IN and Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Campo Alegre 687,
4169 007 Porto, Portugal.
E-mail: [email protected]
Madhuri Sharon
N.S.N. Research Centre for Nanotechnology and Bionanotechnology, SICES College, Jambhul Phata,
Kalyan - Badlapur Road, Ambernath (W), 421505, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
M. L. Singla
Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (CSIR-CSIO), Chandigarh, India.
List of Contributors xiii
Suman Singh
Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (CSIR-CSIO), Chandigarh, India.
Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: 91-0172-265-17-87
Fax: 91-0172-265.70.82
S. H. Sonawane
Department of Chemical Engineering National Institute of Technology, Warangal, 506004 AP India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Keka Talukdar
Department of Physics, NIT Durgapur-713209, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Kannan Vaidyanathan
Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Tiruvalla, Kerala 689 101, India.
S. Yoo
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University.
E-mail: [email protected]
Optoelectronic Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton So17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
indebted to the Apple Academic Press editorial office and the publishing and produc-
tion teams for their assistance in preparation and publication of this issue.
CONTENTS
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the study of magnetic nanoparticle systems has received growing at-
tention. With view to many applications, this area of scientific study shows enormous
potential for growth. One central theme of this line of investigation is how the mag-
netic properties of nanoparticle assemblies are modified with respect to the bulk. Such
differences in magnetic behavior are expected to arise from interparticle interactions,
which will depend on the intervening non-magnetic matrix in which the particles are
suspended, and from the size confinement effects, essentially due to the surface an-
isotropy of the particles. In addition to these fundamental effects, we also need to
consider the superparamagnetic (SPM) behavior that is of great importance to the
overall magnetic behavior of these systems. The SPM effects are strongly related to
the overall magnetic anisotropy of the individual particles and have strong temperature
dependences (Dormann et al., 1997).
Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) can provide useful information not only on “bulk”
magnetic properties, but is also useful in evaluating surface magnetic properties and
interactions (Vonsovskii, 1966; Puszkarski, 1979; Maksymowicz, 1986). Much of the
previous FMR studies on nanoparticle systems have concentrated on the temperature
dependence of the resonance field. Raikher and Stepanov (1994) considered the case
of a suspension of single domain ferromagnetic particle ferrofluids. In this work the
authors consider the SPM thermal fluctuation and anisotropy effects and particle mo-
bility in an applied magnetic field. The double peaked spectra are explained in terms
of the alignment of the particles’ anisotropy axes in the field and from the random ori-
entation of the grains at low temperatures. Antoniak et al. (2005) considered nanopar-
ticle assemblies of FexPt1−x. In this study the authors show that the size distribution of
the particles is an important parameter in the evaluation of the blocking temperature
and the overall effective anisotropy. The particles were assumed to be noninteracting,
where a surface anisotropy was enhanced by the formation of an oxide ( – Fe2O3) sur-
face layer. The same system was studied by Ulmeanu et al., (2004), where frequency
dependent FMR measurements were used to assess the g factor of the nanoparticles.
Berger et al. (2001) considered the temperature dependence of superparamagnetic res-
onance in the maghemite ( – Fe2O3) system, where again the importance of the size
distribution is shown to be of fundamental importance in the evaluation of blocking
temperatures and the existence of double peaked spectra. Dipole-dipole interactions
(DDI) are discussed, but without calculating their effects. In a recent study we have
also studied this system where we use DDI to evaluate the angular dependence of the
resonance lines (Schmool and Schmalzl, 2007).
Nanogranular layered magnetic films are a special class of magnetoresistive (MR)
system which consists of separate layers of ferromagnetic nanoparticles embedded in
an insulating matrix and are usually called discontinuous metal- insulator magnetic
multilayers (DMIM) (Sankar et al., 1997). Due to their transport properties (tunnel
magnetoresistance properties; TMR ~ 10%) and multilayered structure, they possess a
general similarity with the well known magnetic multilayered giant magnetoresistance
(GMR) systems, (Baibich et al., 1988) see also GMR in magnetic metal/ nonmagnetic
metal discontinuous GMR multilayers (Hylton et al., 1993).
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 3
Our main objective will be to consider some of the main aspects of the behavior of
magnetic nanoparticles and in particular how ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) can be
applied to such assemblies. The FMR is a highly sensitive technique, which essentially
measures the internal effective magnetic field of ferromagnetic systems:
∂E
H eff = − (1)
∂M
where E represents the energy density of the magnetic system and M the saturation
magnetization. (In all cases where energy is considered we have parameterized such
that it is in the form of an energy density.) This is a convenient way of considering
the magnetic behavior since we can include only those contributions to the magnetic
properties, which are appropriate to a particular situation. For example, the Zeeman
energy, magnetostatic energies from sample shape, magnetocrystalline, and surface
anisotropies can all be easily included into the total magnetic energy.
In this chapter, we outline the basic study of the effects of the magnetic dipo-
lar interaction in an assembly of ferromagnetic nanoparticles, its effect on magnetic
properties of nanoparticle assemblies and in particular with respect to ferromagnet-
ic resonance studies. In the theory of dipole-dipole interactions, we show the basic
physics of the dipolar interaction and illustrate the overall effects using computer
simulations of regular and random arrays of particles. The theory is presented for
random general assemblies including an explanation of the nature of the simulations
for arrays of particles. We will introduce the basic theory of FMR and then show
how this is adapted to the study of nanoparticle systems; the relation between in-
terparticle interactions in NP assemblies and angular studies by ferromagnetic
resonance (FMR) will be discussed. An introduction to surface anisotropy is made
as well as the multispin approach to the problem. A brief overview of linewidth of
resonance is also given. We show some experimental results for random particle as-
semblies, and illustrate how information can be extracted from the FMR spectra. Some
studies with respect to sample temperature are also given.
where mi,j represents the magnetic moment of particle i,j and rij is the displacement
vector between them. We are principally interested in the effects of interactions in as-
semblies under conditions of ferromagnetic resonance. We consider the case in which
the applied magnetic field is sufficient to saturate the sample and as such all magnetic
moments will be aligned (as in the case of an FMR experiment).
Under this state, we can simplify (2) using the spherical coordinate system as:
mi m j
E ijDDI (θ ,ϑ, φ,ϕ) =
4 πrij3
[1 − 3(sinθ sinϑ cos(φ − ϕ) + cosθ cosϑ )2 ] (3)
All angles are defined in Figure 1 (a) and (b). This equation can be further simpli-
fied for the case, where the vector between magnetic moments is aligned along one
of the principal axes. Importantly, this equation demonstrates the introduction of a
magnetic anisotropy into the system. The overall anisotropy will depend explicitly on
the spatial distribution of the magnetic nanoparticle assembly.
We can sum all interactions in an assembly using the following equation:
1
DDI
E TOT = ∑ E ijDDI = ∑ ∑ E ijDDI (θ ,ϑ, φ,ϕ) (4)
i, j 2 i j ≠i
FIGURE 1 (a) Basic coordinate geometry for the dipolar interaction between two magnetic
particles. (b) Spherical coordinate system for the magnetic sample. (c) Schematic illustration of
a section of the nanoparticle assembly.
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 5
The factor of 1/2 is required so as to not count the interactions twice. Equation
(4) can be used for a random array of particles, though positions of all particles must
be known for the calculation to be performed. We illustrate simulations on systems
of this type to show how such calculations can be made. For systems in which the
ferromagnetic nanoparticles are arranged in layers, such as discontinuous magnetic
multilayer systems (Sankar et al., 1997), then we can separate the interactions to those
in the same plane and those in adjacent layers, where we neglect non-adjacent layer
interactions. Figure 2 illustrates the geometry of such a system. We consider contribu-
tions arising from dipolar interactions within each (discontinuous) layer in - plane (or
intraplanar interactions, IP) and those between the various planes (out of plane, OP),
or interplanar interactions.
DDI
Within the layer, the total (in - plane, IP) dipolar energy, E IP , is the sum over all
the magnetic moments, where ij = 90, which gives:
N N
1
E DDI
IP = ∑ ∑ E ijDDI = Γ1IP +Γ2IP sin 2 ϑ (5)
2 i=1 j =1
j ≠i
IP
Here Γ1,2 are constants depending on the distribution of the magnetic moments in
the layer:
1 N N mi m j
Γ1IP = ∑∑
2Vm i=1 j =1 4 πrij3
j ≠i
N N
1 mi m j 2
Γ = IP
∑ ∑
2Vm i=1 j =1 4 πrij3
2 sin Φij
(6)
j ≠i
The summation over j considers one particles’ interaction with all the other (N - 1)
particles within the layer, while the summation over i considers all of these interac-
tions for all N particles. The value of the constants (mi, mj, and <rij>) will determine
the energy scale, or in the FMR spectra, the field scale, of the total angular variation.
Vm represents the total magnetic volume of the particles, which can be expressed as:
N
Vm = ∑Vi (7)
i=1
6 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
FIGURE 2 Schematic diagram of the planar geometry for layered particle systems illustrating
(a) intraplanar interactions and (b) interplanar particle interactions.
We note that the magnetic volume and volume fraction are related via the expres-
sion, f = Vm/V, where V is the total volume of the sample. With regards to the dipolar
interaction between layers; only interactions between adjacent layers are considered,
while those between non-adjacent layers are considered as negligible. In this case, we
consider mi and mk as two magnetic moments from two different but adjacent layers.
Summing over all the magnetic moments of the two layers, we obtain:
DDI
E OP = Γ1OP + Γ2OP sin 2 ϑ + Γ3OP cos2 ϑ (8)
OP
where Γ1,2,3 are constants depending on the distribution of the magnetic moments in-
side the two layers.
These are given by:
1 N N ' mi mk
Γ1OP = ∑∑
2Vm i=1 k =1 4 πrik3
N N'
1 3mi mk
Γ OP
2 = ∑ ∑ 2 2
3 sin Θik sin Φ ik
2Vm i=1 k =1 4 πrik
N N'
1 3mi mk
Γ3OP = ∑ ∑
2Vm i=1 k =1 4 πrik3
cos2 Θik (9)
n n
DDI
E TOT = ∑ (E IP
DDI
) L +∑ (E OP
DDI
) L' = Γ1eff + Γ2eff sin 2 ϑ + (n −1)Γ3OP cos2 ϑ (10)
L =1 L' =1
DDI
E RA (ϑ ) = E 0 cos2 ϑ + E1 (11)
The size of the variation will be given by E0 and an offset E1 is also included. Both
constants will depend on the magnetic moment (magnetization) of the particles as well
as their average effective separation. The energy E0 is a measure of the maximum to
minimum energy of the angular dependence.
8 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
FIGURE 3 (a) Angular variation of the DDI energy for a regular cubic array of NPs
(50 × 50 × 5) as evaluated from (3) (points) and a fit to (4) (solid line). (b) Aspect
ratio (sample shape) dependence of E0 on R = z/x, the dashed line corresponds to the
demagnetizing energy of an uniformly magnetised sample.
In a series of simulations we have varied the aspect ratio R, from a thin layer (R ∼
0; R< 1) through a cube (R = 1) to a columnar shape (R >1). For such a shape varia-
tion, we see the dependence as illustrated in Figure 3 (b). We note that for slab type
geometries, E(0) > (π/2), that is positive E0, while for the cube shaped distribution,
we have E0 = 0 and E0 becomes negative for columnar samples distributions, that is,
DDI energy curve becomes inverted. The dashed line is based on the demagnetizing
energy with the dimensions of the NP distribution; E(R) = K(1 − R)/(1 + R), where
K is a constant (Schmool and Barandiarán, 1999). In Figure 4, we show the results
of simulations for both regular and random arrays of NPs, where we have varied the
density (or equivalently the filling factor, f = Vm/VTOT) of NPs in the assembly. For the
case of the random array calculations, a computer generated random number program
partially “occupies” a set number of lattice sites (depending on the density to be evalu-
ated). In these calculations, we repeat the simulation 20 times and obtain an average to
eliminate any distorted assembly distributions that may occur; the error in the random
distributions reflects the variance in these results. In both cases, we observe a density-
squared dependence.
FIGURE 4 Variation of DDI energy E0 as a function of particle density, ρN, for (a) random
particle arrays and (b) regular NP assemblies.
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 9
1.3.1 INTRODUCTION
While the basic theory of FMR in nanoparticle systems will use the usual formalism
common to ferromagnetic resonance experiments, we need to consider how the energy
contributions must be selected to account for the particular behavior of nanoparticle
assemblies. To obtain the resonance condition used in FMR we generally start by con-
sidering the Landau–Lifshitz equation with some form of damping. From this, the so-
called Smit–Beljers equation can be derived. This can be suitably modified to include
the possible existence of spin wave resonance modes, important in confined magnetic
systems, such as thin films and nanoparticles. This equation will require the energy
equation with full angular dependence from which we evaluate the second derivatives
with respect to the polar and azimuthal angles. We also require the equilibrium condi-
tions, which are used in conjunction with the resonance equation and are obtained by
setting the first derivatives of the energy, with respect to the angles, to zero.
Using the uniform FMR mode our resonance equation takes the form:
(1+ α ) ⎡⎛ ∂ 2 E ⎞⎛ ∂ 2 E ⎞ ⎛ ∂ 2 E ⎞ ⎤
2
⎛ ω ⎞2
⎜ ⎟ = ⎢⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ −⎜ ⎟ ⎥
⎝γ ⎠ M 0 sin 2 ϑ ⎢⎣⎝ ∂ϑ 2 ⎠⎝ ∂ϕ 2 ⎠ ⎝ ∂ϑ∂ϕ ⎠ ⎥⎦
(12)
where is the angular frequency of the exciting field (microwave radiation), g is the
magnetogyric ratio and is the Gilbert damping parameter. For spin wave resonance
additional terms must be added, see for example (Schmool and Barandiarán, 1998).
1 ˜ p ⋅ M + 1 f 2M⋅ N
˜ s ⋅ M − fM⋅ H
E= f (1 − f )M⋅ N (13)
2 2
where f represents the volume fraction of particles; f = Vm/V, V being the total volume
of the sample, N˜ p is the particle shape tensor while N˜ s is that of the sample. In a recent
article we have shown that a more appropriate treatment would be to substitute the
sample shape energy with a summation of the dipolar interactions between all the
magnetic particles (Schmool et al., 2007).
10 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
1 ˜ p ⋅ M + E TOT
DDI
E= f (1 − f )M⋅ N − fM⋅ H (14)
2
where the dipolar energy term can be expressed as given in the dipole energy equations
shown above; Equation. (4) or (10), depending on the type of nanoparticle assembly
under consideration. We note that the form of the dipolar energy used is only valid for
the case where all magnetic moments are aligned, for example by an applied external
field. In FMR this is a valid assumption for weak magnetic anisotropies. Using this
analysis we can obtain the resonance equation in the following form (Schmool et al.,
2007; Schmool and Schmalzl, 2009):
where C is a constant which depends on details of the particle shape and assembly
type. For example, for spherical particles takes the form:
3
π r
C= MV (17)
6
<r> is the average particle radius. For non-spherical particles this constant will have an
additional term related to the particle shape anisotropy (Schmool et al., 2007).
In the case of the layered particle system we considered above we can write:
⎡ ⎤
N N
3MVm ⎢ n 1 (n −1) N N ' 1 ⎥
C= ∑ ∑ sin Φij − NN' ∑ ∑ r 3 cos Θik ⎥
8π ⎢ N(N −1) i=1 j =1 rij3
2 2
⎢⎣ j ≠i
i=1 k =1 ik
⎥⎦
(18)
where it has been assumed that all particles have the same volume (monodisper-
the geometric factors, which must be evaluated in order to estimate the expected angu-
lar variation of the resonance field.
where mi is the unit vector in the direction of the magnetization and uˆ i a unit vector
in the direction of the easy axis. Here Ks will be the anisotropy strength. This model
is known as the transverse surface anisotropy. The summation in Equation. (19) will
account for the combined energy of all the spins (i) in the nanoparticle. In this case
we can use a one-spin approach whereby all individual spins in the nanoparticle are
approximated by a macro-spin. A more realistic description is given by the Néel model
for surface anisotropy and can be expressed as (Kachkachi and Bonet, 2006):
Néel
E Surf = −K s ∑ ∑ (mi ⋅ eˆ ij ) 2 (20)
i j ≠i
where eˆ ij = rij /rij is an interatomic vector between surface atoms. This will naturally
account for the change in symmetry when a surface atom is encountered and is a mi-
croscopic model, which can be distinguished from the one-spin approximation. Such
expressions can be readily introduced into the FMR equation by summing the surface
anisotropy energy to the other components of the energy and applying the usual ap-
proach via Equation (12). Extension to a full multi-spin calculation is complex since
the N spins in the nanoparticle will have to be assessed for their individual resonance
condition giving rise to an N coupled resonance equation.
has been developed to study the resonance conditions in a multispin system. In this
model, a single nanoparticle is constructed of N – spins, which are exchange coupled,
the resonance condition for each spin (i) is then considered in its own specific effec-
eff
tive field, H i .
As such, the reduced free energy takes the form:
Hˆ i
zi
In this equation, the first term represents the Zeeman energy, the second term is
the reduced anisotropy energy, which can be modified to include any relevant symme-
tries including spins at the particle surface and the final term is the reduced exchange
energy which accounts for the local coordination, zi. Using a similar approach to that
when considering the classical FMR theory, we obtain the N - spin resonance equation,
which is analogous to the Smit - Beljers equation, of the form:
⎛ 1 ⎞
⎜ ∂ϑ kϑ i ε i ∂ϑ2kϕ i ε i ⎟
2
sin ϑ i
H ik (ε i ) = ⎜ ⎟
⎜⎜ 1 ∂ 2 ε 1
∂ϕ2kϕ i ε i ⎟⎟
ϕϑ i
⎝ sin ϑ k k i sin ϑ k sin ϑ i ⎠ (23)
⎛ −η −1⎞
Iη = ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1 −η⎠ (24)
iω
Ωik (η) = δ I
1+ η2 ik η (25)
Solutions for the resonance frequency are then obtained from the pure imaginary
[ ]
values of the matrix H ik I−η αβ . It is note worthy that the form of the kernel has a par-
ticular symmetry; the leading diagonal block terms (of 2 x 2) are of the form of the
Smit–Beljers equation for each spin, then off - diagonal (2 x 2) blocks will be interac-
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 13
tion terms between the various spins, where the further off-diagonal the further spins
are physically. Preliminary simulations illustrate the variation of the resonance (fre-
quency) spectra with possible indications of the influence of surface spins, which are
illustrated in Figure 5 for cubic- and spherical-shaped particles. The spectral analysis
is made as a function of the particle size (number of spins), this should show the influ-
ence of the surface spins which will be most important for the smaller particles. The
direct computed spectrum is comprised of the resonance frequencies of the individual
spins, which will be different for each spin environment (corner, edge, face, and so
on.). The corresponding correlation function is then evaluated to obtain the statisti-
cally most probable frequencies. The size dependence of the resonance frequency is
illustrated in Figure 5 (c) and 5 (d) for the cubic and spherical particles, respectively.
As the particles increase in size the resonance frequency tends to saturate. It will be
noted that the main resonance frequency saturates rapidly in the case of the cubic par-
ticles, which have a much larger surface area to volume ratio. Also, we note a small
contribution (shoulder) which appears to correspond to the resonance of the smallest
particle, which could be related to the surface spins resonance (Sousa et al. 2009,
Schmool, 2009).
FIGURE 5 (Continued)
14 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
FIGURE 5 (Continued)
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 15
FIGURE 5 Simulated frequency spectra for (a) cubic and (b) spherical shaped Fe
nanoparticles. The evolution of the dominant resonance peak for these are given in
(c) and (d), respectively.
1 ∂M α ⎛ ∂M ⎞
= −(M × H eff ) + ⎜M × ⎟ (26)
γ ∂t γM ⎝ ∂t ⎠
The Gilbert parameter, , represents the damping strength and is related to the intrinsic
linewidth by the relation (Vonsovskii, 1966; Farle, 1998):
α ⎛∂2E 1 ∂2E ⎞
ΔH 0 = ⎜ 2+ ⎟ (27)
M ⎝ ∂ϑ sin ϑ ∂ϕ 2 ⎠
There are other contributions to the linewidth that are related to material proper-
ties providing several broadening mechanisms. In general, we consider that anything
which gives rise to varying microscopic environments for individual spins will cause
some form of extrinsic broadening due to effective modification caused in the effective
field felt by the spins. This will produce a range of resonance conditions which, when
taken together in an experimental spectrum, will give rise to a superposition of the
various resonances resulting in an overall linewidth broadening. The various contribu-
tions, following Vittoria et al. (1967), can be expressed as:
16 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
⎛ ∂H ⎞ ⎛ ∂H ⎞ ⎛ ∂H ⎞ ⎛ ∂H ⎞
ΔH = ΔH 0 + ⎜ ⎟Δφ + ⎜ ⎟ ΔH i + ⎜ ⎟ ΔV + ⎜ ⎟ΔS
⎝ ∂φ ⎠ ⎝ ∂H i ⎠ ⎝ ∂V ⎠ ⎝ ∂S ⎠ (28)
Here the first term on the right-hand side represents the intrinsic linewidth given
by Equation (27), the second term is a contribution due to a spread in the crystal-
line axes, the third term arises from magnetic in homogeneities, the fourth term
arises from variations in grain size for particulate systems, and the final term is
the contribution due to surface spins of the magnetic particles. We have extended
this approach to include variations in particle volume and surface contributions in
nanoparticle systems. Here V will be a contribution from the distribution in par-
ticle volume e.g., log-normal behavior, which is frequently observed in nanoparticle
systems (Tronc et al., 2000).
FIGURE 6 Angular dependence of the resonance field for samples of γ − Fe2O3 nanoparticles
with an average diameter of 4.6 nm. The line is a fit to Equation (15).
The layered type structures indicated can be realized with the deposition of dis-
continuous magnetic multilayers, in which the magnetic films are sub-coalescence
and effectively form a layer of nanoparticles. A multilayer system composed of ten
insulating/ferromagnetic bilayers given by [Al2O3(40 Å)/ Co80Fe20 (t)]10/Al2O3(30 Å),
where t is the effective thickness of the CoFe layer. This corresponds to an effective
thickness of a continuous layer with the same quantity of CoFe. We need to use this
effective thickness instead of an absolute thickness because below 18 Å, CoFe films
become discontinuous (Popplewell and Sakhnini, 1995; Kakazei et al. 2001). It will
be noted that the Al2O3 layers are insulating and only dipolar interactions between the
nanoparticles will be expected.
Figure 7 displays a sequence of representative FMR spectra as a function of the
angle of the applied field, θ , for the sample with an effective thickness of 13 Å. As the
angle increase from 0° to 90°, the resonance lines shift to lower fields. Figure 8 shows
the resonance fields, as well as theoretical simulations for these results, as a function
of θ , for the four samples studied. We can see that increasing the effective thick-
ness, the angular dependence of the resonance field becomes stronger. The difference
(H⊥ − H|| ) for the 13 Å sample is about 8750 Oe, while for the 7 Å sample it is only
2850 Oe. Simulations are based on a numerical solution of Equation (15), where the
fitting parameters are given in Table 1.
18 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
FIGURE 7 Representative spectra obtained for the [Al2O3(40 Å)/ Co80Fe20 (t)]10/Al2O3(30 Å),
sample with t = 13 Å for various angles.
FIGURE 8 Angular variation of the resonance field from out-of-plane 0° to in-plane 90° for
(a) t = 7 Å, (b) t = 9 Å, (c) t = 11 Å, and (d) t = 13 Å.
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 19
TABLE 1 Fitting parameters for the [Al2O3(40 Å)/ Co80Fe20 (t)]10/Al2O3(30 Å), sample with t =
13 Å used for angular measurements
7 990 3.30
9 1950 3.40
11 2800 3.45
13 3450 3.25
[ ]
2
into the resonance Equation (15) by taking (ω / γ ) → (ω / γ ) − H K , where HK is
2
the anisotropy field given by 2<K>/M, where <K> represents the average anisotropy
constant. The angular variation of Hres will in no way depend on this term and reflects
the variation of magnetization M in the superparamagnetic (SPM) regime, which can
be expressed using a weighted Langevin function (Goya et al., 2003):
⎛ HMVm ⎞
M = M s ∫ L⎜ ⎟ f (V )dV (29)
⎝ kB T ⎠
f(V) represents the log-normal distribution (Schmool and Schmalzl, 2007).
This can be expressed as:
⎪⎧ [ln(V /Vm )] ⎪⎫
2
1
f (V ) = exp⎨ − ⎬
2πσV ⎪⎩ 2σ 2 ⎪⎭
(30)
In this expression, Vm represents the mean volume of the particles and is the
distribution width, obtained experimentally. In Figure 9 we illustrate the comparison
of the Langevin function with the experimental data. While this does not constitute a
20 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
proof, it shows the trend expected for this behavior. In Table 2 we give the fitting pa-
rameters used for the principal resonance of these data. Note that we are using a fixed
() = 3353 Oe, which corresponds to a frequency of 9.35 GHz and g = 2. We note
that the room temperature value for K compares reasonably well with the bulk value
of 4.7 x 105 erg cm-3 (Krupicka and Zaveta, 1975).
FIGURE 9 Comparison of experimental data points at the measured temperatures with the
Langevin function (line) for γ − Fe2O3 nanoparticles of mean diameter <D> = 4.6 nm.
TABLE 2 Fitting parameters for the γ − Fe2O3 nanoparticles of mean diameter <D> = 4.6 nm
FIGURE 10 Temperature dependence of the resonance field for the [Al2O3(40 Å)/ Co80Fe20
(t)]10/Al2O3(30 Å) discontinuous multilayers.
exp t exp t
In Figure 11, we plot Henh against 1/t, where H enh = H res − H res and H res is
the resonance field expected from a normal classical dependence, extrapolating the
high temperature trend to lower temperatures. Henh (1/t) shows a linear dependence in-
dicating that this enhancement may have its origin in surface anisotropy, which scales
as 1/t. It is clear that the surface contribution should grow with decreasing particle size,
since the surface area to volume ratio increases. Therefore, it appears that, although
the resonance equation used at room temperature is valid, for lower temperatures, < 90
K, we need to include an extra term corresponding to surface anisotropy to account for
the effective field. From Figure 10, it appears that the enhancement vanishes at 15K.
1.5 CONCLUSION
We have presented a theory for ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic nanoparticle sys-
tems, in which we use a direct approach to account for the dipolar interactions between
the magnetic particles. We have shown that the dipole–dipole interaction in ferromag-
netic nanoparticle assemblies is of great importance when considering the magnetic
properties of the assembly as a whole. By summing all interactions in the assembly,
it is possible to illustrate how this introduces a magnetic anisotropy into the system.
Results show that the spatial distribution will have a great influence on this overall
anisotropy and that random arrays of particles can be easily approximated to regular
arrays of NPs as they exhibit virtually identical results for the same particle density.
This is much simpler to treat from a theoretical point of view. The important factor is
the particle density and through this, the magnetic filling factor.
Measurements by FMR on NP assemblies of γ−Fe2O3 illustrate that the theory
presented here shows an excellent agreement with experiment. We are currently in-
vestigating the effects of the volume dispersion on the DDI and its influence in FMR.
We have also applied the theory to the discontinuous multilayer system [Al2O3(40 Å)/
Co80Fe20 (t)]10/Al2O3(30 Å), where the effective magnetic layer thickness, t, was varied
between 7 and 13 Å. We observe that the DDI theory adequately explains the angular
dependence of the resonance field and is directly related to the average dipole interac-
tion between the magnetic nanoparticles. From angular dependent FMR measurements
there appears to be a change in magnetic regime from thinner to thicker samples. For
samples with effective thicknesses of 7 and 9 Å there is an overall superparamagnetic
behavior, where dipolar coupling between particles almost vanishes, with each particle
acting in an isolated manner. On the other hand, thicker samples with effective thick-
nesses of 11 and 13 Å act as super ferromagnetic, through the mechanism of magnetic
dipolar coupling between nanoparticles. In this way, the magnetic dipolar interaction
reveals itself to play an important role in nanoparticulate systems.
SUMMARY
Magnetic nanoparticle assemblies present novel magnetic properties with respect to
their bulk constituent components. In addition to the surface effects produced by the
modified atomic symmetry in such low dimensional systems, the magnetic coupling
between the particles also plays a significant role in determining the overall mag-
netic behavior of a magnetic nanoparticle assembly. In this Chapter, we describe a
theoretical model that accounts for the dipolar magnetic interaction between particles.
There are two fundamental aspects of interest in our studies: the spatial distribution
of the particles and density of the particle. These aspects have been addressed in our
simulations, where we have performed simulations for regular and random arrays of
particles. We have discussed the general theory of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)
applied to such systems and how the specific dipolar interactions can be incorpo-
rated for nanoparticle systems. The spatial distribution of particles can give valuable
information of the strength of the dipolar interaction between them and we will dem-
onstrate how this can be used in real systems. We have performed FMR experiments
on nanoparticle assemblies of − Fe2O3 nanoparticles with different average particle
Recent Studies of Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles 23
sizes (2.7–7.3 nm) and particle densities, where samples are in rectangular slab shape.
We have also performed detailed ferromagnetic resonance studies of [Al2O3(40 Å)/
Co80Fe20 (t)]10/Al2O3(30 Å),t = 7−13 Å, discontinuous multilayers, with measurements
taken as a function of the angle of the applied static magnetic field with respect to the
sample at room and low temperatures. Measurements were performed as a function of
the angle between the sample plane and applied magnetic field. Recent studies have
shown that the incorporation of the dipolar interactions into FMR theory can explain
the experimental results for angular studies in magnetic nanoparticle assemblies. A
brief overview is also given of the general theory of FMR in a multispin particle.
KEYWORDS
Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles
Ferromagnetic Resonance
Dipole-dipole Interactions
Magnetic Anisotropy
Spherical Coordinate System
REFERENCES
1. Antoniak, C., Lindner J., and Farle, M. Magnetic anisotropy and its temperature depen-
dence in iron-rich x1-x nanoparticles. Europhys. Lett, 70, 250 (2005).
2. Baibich, M. N. et al. Giant Magnetoresistance of (001) Fe/(001)Cr Magnetic Superlattice.
Phys. Rev. Lett, 61, 2472 (1988).
3. Berger, R., Bissey J. C., Kliava, J., Daubric, H. and Estournès, C. Temperature dependence
of superparamagnetic resonance of iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater, 234,
535 (2001).
4. Dormann, J. L., Fiorani, D., and Tronc, E. Magnetic relaxation in fine-particle system.
Adv. Chem. Phys., 98, 283 (1997).
5. Dubowik, J. Shape anisotropy of magnetic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B, 54, 1088 1996.
6. Farle, M. Ferromagnetic resonance of ultrathin metallic layers. Rep. Prog. Phys., 61, 75
(1998).
7. Goya, G. F., Berquó, T. S., Fonseca, F. C., and Morales, M. P. Static and dynamic magnetic
properties of spherical magnetite nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phy, 94, 3520 (2003)
8. Hylton, T. L., Coffey, K. R., Parker, M. A., and Howard, J. K. Giant Magnetoresistance at
Low Fields in Discontinuous NiFe-Ag Multilayer Thin Films. Science, 261, 1021. (1993).
9. Kachkachi, H. and Bonet, E. Surface-induced cubic anisotropy in nanomagnets. Phys.
Rev, B, 73, 224402 (2006).
10. Kakazei, G.N., Kravets, A. F., Lesnik, N. A., Pereira de Azevedo, M. M., Pogorelov, Yu
G., and Sousa, J. B.. Ferromagnetic resonance in granular thin films. J. Appl. Phy., 85,
5654 (1999).
11. Kakazei, G. N., Pogorelov, Yu. G., Lopes, A. M. L., Sousa, J. B., Cardoso, S., Freitas, P.
P., Pereira de Azevedo, M. M., and Snoeck, E. Tunnel magnetoresistance and magnetic or-
24 Advanced Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
15. Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C.,
Vander, Elst L., and Muller, R. N. Magnetic iron oxide
nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization,
physicochemical characterizations and biological
applications. Chemical Reviews, 108, 2064–2110 (2008).
22. Woo, K., Hong, J., and Ahn, J. P. Synthesis and surface
modification of hydrophobic magnetite to processible
magnetite@silica propylamine. Journal of Magnetism and
Magnetic Materials, 293, 177–181 (2005).
3 CHAPTER 3: AuNPs AND BIOSENSORS: A HAND
TO HAND JOURNEY
11. Brust, M., J. Fink, et. al., Synth esis and reactions
of functionalised gold nanoparticles. Journal of the
Chemical Society, Chemical Communications (16), 1655–1656
(1995).
87. Ma, H., B. Yin, et. al., Synthesis of Silver and AuNPs
by a Novel Electrochemical Method. ChemPhysChem, 5( 1),
68–75 (2004).
92. Matsui, J., K. Akamatsu, et. al., SPR Sensor Chip for
Detection of Small Molecules Using Molecularly Imprinted
Po lymer with Embedded Gold Nanoparticles. Analytical
Chemistry, 77(13), 4282-4285 (2005).
130. Sun, X., and B. Liu, et. al., A novel biosensor for
bovine serum albumin based on fluorescent self-assembled
sandwich bilayers. Luminescence, 24(1), 62–66 (2 009).
9. Cao, H. Q., Xu, Z., Sang, H., Sheng, D., and Tie, C. Y.
Template Synthesis and Magnetic Behavior of an Array of
Cobalt Nanowires Encapsulated in Polyaniline Nanotubules.
Advanced Materials, 13(2), 121–123 (2001).
10. Cao, M., Liu, T., Gao, S., Sun, G., Wu, X., Hu, C., and
Wang, Z. L. Single-Crystal Dendritic Micro-Pines of
Magnetic α-Fe2O3: Large-Scale Synthesis, Formation
Mechanism, and Properties. Angewandte Chemie International
Edition, 44(27), 4197–4201 (2005).
12. Chen, J. S., Zhu, T., Yang, X. H., Yang, H. G., and
Lou, X. W. Top-Down Fabrication of a-Fe2O3 Single-Crystal
Nanodiscs and Microparticles with Tunable Porosity for
Largely Improved Lithium Storage Properties. Journal of
the American Chemical Society, 132(38), 13162–13164
(2010).
16. del Monte, F., Morales, M. P., Levy, D., Fernandez, A.,
Oca, M., Roig, A., Molins, E., O'Grady, K., and Serna, C.
J. Formation of a-Fe2O3 Isolated Nanoparticles in a Silica
Matrix. Langmuir, 13(14), 3627–3634 (1997).
20. Fan, H., Song, B., Liu, J., Yang, Z., and Li, Q.
Thermal formation mechanism and size control of spherical
hematite nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics,
89(2–3), 321–325(2005).
26. Huang, M. H., Mao, S., Feick, H., Yan, H. Q., Wu, Y.
Y., Kind, H., Weber, E., Russo, R., and Yang, P. D.
Room-temperature ultraviolet nanowire nanolasers. Science,
292(5523), 1897–1899 (2001).
28. Huang, X., Qi, X., Huang, Y., Li, S., Xue, C., Gan, C.
L., Boey, F., and Zhang, H. Photochemically Controlled
Synthesis of Anisotropic Au Nanostructures: Platelet-like
Au Nanorods and Six-Star Au Nanoparticles. ACS Nano,
4(10), 6196–6202 (2010).
29. Huber, D. L. Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of
Iron Nanoparticles. Small, 1(5), 482–501 (2005).
32. Jia, C. J., Sun, L. D., Yan, Z. G., Pang, Y. C., You,
L. P., and Yan, C. H. Iron Oxide Tubein-Tube
Nanostructures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,
111(35), 13022–13027 (2007).
33. Jia, C. J., Sun, L. D., Yan, Z. G., You, L. P., Luo,
F., Han, X. D., Pang, Y. C., Zhang, Z., and Yan, C. H.
Single-Crystalline Iron Oxide Nanotubes. Angewandte Chemie
International Edition, 44(28), 4328–4333(2005).
37. Kim, H. J., Choi, K. I., Pan, A., Kim, I. D., Kim, H.
R., Kim, K. M., Na, C. W., Cao, G., and Lee, J. H.
Template-free solvothermal synthesis of hollow hematite
spheres and their applications in gas sensors and Li-ion
batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 21(18),
6549–6555 (2011).
39. Kline, T. R., Tian, M., Wang, J., Sen, A., Chan, M. W.
H., and Mallouk, T. E. TemplateGrown Metal Nanowires.
Inorganic Chemistry, 45(19), 7555–7565 (2006).
42. Lee, G., Cho, Y. S., Park, S., and Yi, G. R. Synthesis
and assembly of anisotropic nanoparticles. Korean Journal
of Chemical Engineering, 28(8), 1641–1650 (2011).
44. Li, L., Chu, Y., Liu, Y., and Dong, L. Template-Free
Synthesis and Photocatalytic Properties of Novel Fe2O3
Hollow Spheres. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,
111(5), 2123–2127 (2007).
45. Lian, J., Duan, X., Ma, J., Peng, P., Kim, T., and
Zheng, W. Hematite (α-Fe2O3) with Various Morphologies:
Ionic Liquid-Assisted Synthesis, Formation Mechanism, and
Properties. ACS Nano, 3(11), 3749–3761 (2009).
46. Lian, S. Y., Li, H. T., He, X. D., Kang, Z. H., Liu,
Y., and Lee, S. T. Hematite homogeneous core/shell
hierarchical spheres: Surfactant-free solvothermal
preparation and their improved catalytic property of
selective oxidation. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 185,
117–123 (2012).
47. Liang, X., Wang, X., Zhuang, J., Chen, Y. T., Wang, D.
S., and Li, Y. D. Synthesis of nearly monodisperse iron
oxide and oxyhydroxide nanocrystals. Advanced Functional
Materials, 16(14), 1805–1813 (2006).
53. Liu, J. P., Li, Y. Y., Fan, H. J., Zhu, Z. H., Jiang,
J., Ding, R. M., Hu, Y. Y., and Huang, X. T. Iron
Oxide-Based Nanotube Arrays Derived from Sacrificial
Template-Accelerated Hydrolysis: Large-Area Design and
Reversible Lithium Storage. Chemistry of Materials, 22(1),
212–217 (2010).
55. Liu, X. H., Qiu, G. Z., Yan, A. G., Wang, Z., and Li,
X. G. Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of
α-FeOOH and α-Fe2O3 uniform nanocrystallines. Journal of
Alloys and Compounds, 433(1–2), 216–220 (2007).
56. Liu, Z. H., Jiao, Y. P., Wang, Y. F., Zhou, C. R., and
Zhang, Z. Y. Polysaccharides-based nanoparticles as drug
delivery systems. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 60(15),
1650– 1662 (2008).
57. Lu, H. B., Liao, L., Li, J. C., Shuai, M., and Liu, Y.
L. Hematite nanochain networks: Simple synthesis, magnetic
properties, and surface wettability. Applied Physics
Letters, 92(9), 3 (2008).
59. Lv, B., Liu, Z., Tian, H., Xu, Y., Wu, D., and Sun, Y.
Single-Crystalline Dodecahedral and Octodecahedralα-Fe2O3
Particles Synthesized by a Fluoride Anion–Assisted
Hydrothermal Method. Advanced Functional Materials, 20(22),
3987–3996 (2010).
60. Lv, B., Xu, Y., Wu, D., and Sun, Y. Single-crystal
[small alpha]-Fe2O3 hexagonal nanorings: stepwise influence
of different anionic ligands (F- and SCN- anions). Chemical
Communications, 47 (3), 967–969 (2011).
62. Mahmoudi, M., Simchi, A., Imani, M., Stroeve, P., and
Sohrabi, A. Templated growth of superparamagnetic iron
oxide nanoparticles by temperature programming in the
presence of poly(vinyl alcohol). Thin Solid Films,
518(15), 4281–4289 (2010).
64. Mao, Y., Park, T. J., Zhang, F., Zhou, H., and Wong, S.
S. Environmentally Friendly Methodologies of Nanostructure
Synthesis. Small, 3(7), 1122–1139(2007).
79. Park, S. J., Kim, S., Lee, S., Khim, Z. G., Char, K.,
and Hyeon, T. Synthesis and Magnetic Studies of Uniform
Iron Nanorods and Nanospheres. Journal of the American
Chemical Society, 122(35), 8581–8582 (2000).
80. Park, S., Lee, M. R., and Shin, I. Chemical tools for
functional studies of glycans. Chem Soc Rev, 37(8),
1579–91 (2008).
81. Park, T. J. and Wong, S. S. As-Prepared
Single-Crystalline Hematite Rhombohedra and Subsequent
Conversion into Monodisperse Aggregates of Magnetic
Nanocomposites of Iron and Magnetite. Chemistry of
Materials, 18(22), 5289–5295(2006).
95. Shi, W., Liang, P., Ge D., Wang, J., and Zhang, Q.
Starch-assisted synthesis of polypyrrole nanowires by a
simple electrochemical approach. Chemical Communications,
23, 2414–2416 (2007).
107. Wen, X., Wang, S., Ding, Y., Wang, Z. L., and Yang, S.
Controlled Growth of Large-Area, Uniform, Vertically
Aligned Arrays of α-Fe2O3 Nanobelts and Nanowires. The
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(1), 215–220 (2004).
108. Wheeler, D. A., Wang, G., Ling, Y., Li, Y., and Zhang,
J. Z. Nanostructured hematite: synthesis,
characterization, charge carrier dynamics, and
photoelectrochemical properties. Energy & Environmental
Science, 5(5), 6682–6702 (2012).
111. Yang, Z., Xia, Y., and Mokaya, R. High Surface Area
Silicon Carbide Whiskers and Nanotubes Nanocast Using
Mesoporous Silica. Chemistry of Materials, 16(20),
3877–3884 (2004).
117. Zheng, Z., Huang, Ma, Zhang, Liu, LiuLiu Z., Wong, K.
W., and Lau, W. M. Biomimetic Growth of Biomorphic CaCO3
with Hierarchically Ordered Cellulosic Structures. Crystal
Growth & Design, 7(9), 1912–1917 (2007).
118. Zhong, Z., Ho, J., Teo, J., Shen, S., and Gedanken, A.
Synthesis of Porous α-Fe2O3 Nanorods and Deposition of
Very Small Gold Particles in the Pores for Catalytic
Oxidation of CO. Chemistry of Materials, 19(19),
4776–4782(2007).
120. Zhou, Y. X., Yao, H. B., Yao, W. T., Zhu, Z., and Yu,
S. H. Sacrificial Templating Synthesis of Hematite
Nanochains from [Fe18S25](TETAH)14 Nanoribbons: Their
Magnetic, Electrochemical, and Photocatalytic Properties.
Chemistry-a European Journal, 18(16), 5073–5079 (2012).
14. Paul, M. C., Bysakh, S., Das, S., Bhadra, S. K., Pal,
M., Yoo, S., Kalita, M. P., Boyland, A., and Sahu, J. K.
Yb 2 O 3 -doped YAG nano-crystallites in silica-based core
glass matrix of optical fiber preform. Materials Science
and Engineering B, 175(2), 108–119 (2010).
22. Yoo, S., Basu, C., Boyland, A. J., Stone, C., Nilsson,
J., Sahu, J. K., and Payne D.. Photodarkening in Yb-doped
aluminosilicate fibers induced by 488 nm irradiation. Opics
Letter, 32(12), 1626–1628 (2007).
11. Berthe, L., Fabbro, R., Peyre, P., Tollier, L., and
Bartinicki, E. Shock waves from a waterconfined
laser-generated plasma. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2826–2832
(1997).
18. Emanetoglu, N. W., Gorla, C., Liu, Y., Liang, S., and
Lu, Y.Epitaxial ZnO piezoelectric thin films for saw
filters. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process, 2, 247–252 (1999)
25. Han, N. S., Shim, H. S., Seo, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Park,
S. M., and Song, J. K. Defect states of ZnO nanoparticles:
Discrimination by time-resolved photoluminescence
spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 084306(1)–084306(7)
(2010).
26. He, C., Saski, T., Usui, H., Shimizu, Y., and
Koshizaki, N. Fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles by pulsed
laser ablation in aqueous media and pH-dependent particle
size: An approach to study the mechanism of enhanced green
photoluminescence. J. Photochem and Photobiology A:
Chemistry, 191, 66–73 (2007).
28. Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Bai, X., He, J., Liu, J., and
Zhang X. Bicrystalline Zinc Oxide Nanocombs. J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol., 6, 2566–2570 (2006).
31. Hui, Z., Deren, Y., Xiangyang, M., Yujie, J., Jin, X.,
and Duanlin, Q. Synthesis of flowerlike ZnO nanostructures
by an organic-free hydrothermal process. Nanotechnology,
15, 622–626 (2004).
33. Joseph, M., Tabata, H., Saeki, H., Ueda, K., and Kawai,
T..Fabrication of the low-resistive p-type ZnO by codoping
method. Physica B, 302, 140–148 (2001).
34. Joshy, N. V., Saji K. J., andJayaraj, M. K. Spatial and
temporal studies of laser ablated ZnO plasma. J. Appl.
Phys, 104, 053307(1)–053307(6) (2008).
35. Kim, K. K., Kim, H. S., Hwang, D. K., Lim, J. H., and
Park, S. J. Realization of p-type ZnO thin films via
phosphorus doping and thermal activation of the dopant.
Appl. Phys. Lett, 83, 63–65 (2003).
40. Kooli, F., Chsem I,. C., and Vucelic, W. Synthesis and
Properties of Terephthalate and Benzoate Intercalates of
Mg−Al Layered Double Hydroxides Possessing Varying Layer
Charge. Chem. Mater., 8, 1969–1977 (1996).
43. Lee, J. Y., Choi, Y. S., Kim, J. H., Park, M. O., and
Im, S. Optimizing n-ZnO/p-Si heterojunctions for photodiode
applications. Thin Solid Films, 403, 553–557 (2002).
44. Lee, C. Y., Tseng, T. Y., Li, S., and Lin, P. Effect of
phosphorus dopant on photoluminescence and field-emission
characteristics of Mg 0.1 Zn 0.9 O nanowires. J. Appl.
Phys, 99, 024303(1)–024303(6) (2006).
46. Liang, S., Sheng H., Liu, Y., Huo Z., Lu, Y., and Shen,
H. ZnO Schottky ultraviolet photodetectors. J. Crystal
Growth, 225, 110–113 (2001).
48. Lin, Y., Zhang, Z., Tang, Z., Yuan, F., and Li, J.
Characterisation of ZnO-based varistors prepared from
nanometre Precursor powders. Adv. Mater. Opt. Electron., 9,
205–209 (1999).
63. Ohtomo, A., Shiroki, R., Ohkubo, I., Koinuma, H., and
Kawasaki M.Thermal stability of supersaturated MgxZn1−xO
alloy films and MgxZn1−xO/ZnOheterointerfaces. Appl. Phys.
Lett., 75, 4088–4090 (1999).
67. Peng, W. Q., Qu, S.C., Cong. G.W., and Wang, Z.G.
Structure and visible luminescence of ZnO nanoparticles.
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 9, 156–159
(2006).
78. Sugiyama, M., Okazaki, H., and Koda, S. Size and Shape
Transformation of TiO2 Nanoparticles by Irradiation of
308-nm Laser Beam.Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 41, 4666–4674
(2002).
81. Sun, H. D., Makino, T., Tuan, N. T., Segawa, Y., Tang,
Z. K., Wong, G. K. L., Kawasaki, M., Ohtomo, A., Tamura,
K., and Koinuma H. Stimulated emission induced by exciton–
exciton scattering in ZnO/ZnMgO multiquantum wells up to
room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 4250–4252 (2000).
86. Tsai, M. K., Huang, C. C., Lee, Y. C., Yang, C. S., Yu,
H. C., Lee, J. W., Hu, S. Y., and Chen, C. H. A study on
morphology control and optical properties of ZnOnanorods
synthesized by microwave heating. J. Lumin.,132, 226–230
(2012).
87. Tsuji, T., Hamagami, T., Kawamura, T., Yamaki, J., and
Tsuji, M. Laser ablation of cobalt and cobalt oxides in
liquids: influence of solvent on composition of prepared
nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci., 243, 214–219 (2005).
89. Wang, J. B., Zhang, C. Y., Zhong, X. L., and Yang, G.W.
Cubic and hexagonal structures of diamond nanocrystals
formed upon pulsed laser induced liquid–solid interfacial
reaction. Chem. Phys. Lett. 361, 86–90 (2002).
92. Xiangyang, M., Hui, Z., Yujie J., Jin, X., and Deren,
Y. Sequential occurrence of ZnOnanopaticles, nanorods, and
nanotips during hydrothermal process in a dilute aqueous
solution. Materials Letters, 59, 3393–3397 (2005).
94. Yeh, M. S., Yang, Y. S., Lee, Y. P., Lee, H. F., Yeh,
Y. H., and Yeh, C. S. Formation and Characteristics of Cu
Colloids from CuO Powder by Laser Irradiation in
2-Propanol. J. Phys. Chem. B, 103, 6851–6857 (1999).
95. Zeng, H. B., Cai, W. P., Hu, J. L., Duan, G. T., Liu,
P. S., and Li, Y. Violet photoluminescence from shell layer
of Zn/ZnO core-shell nanoparticles induced by laser
ablation. Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, 171910(1)–171910(3)
(2006).
96. Zeng, H., Cai, W., Li, Y., Hu, J., and Liu, P.
Composition/Structural Evolution and Optical Properties of
ZnO/Zn Nanoparticles by Laser Ablation in Liquid
Media.J.Phys. Chem. B., 109, 18260–18266 (2005).
97. Zeng, H., Li, Z., Cai, W., Cao, B., Liu, P., and Yang,
S. Microstructure Control of Zn/ZnO Core/Shell
Nanoparticles and Their Temperature-Dependent Blue
Emissions. J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 14311–14317 (2007).
98. Zhang, B. P., Binh, N. T., Wakatsuki, K., Liu, C. Y.,
Segawa, Y., and Usami, N. Growth of ZnO/MgZnO quantum
wells on sapphire substrates and observation of the
two-dimensional confinement effect. Appl. Phys. Lett., 86,
032105(1)–032105(3) (2005)
99. Zhang, J., Sun, L. D., Yin, J. L., Su, H. L., Liao, C.
S., and Yan, C. H. Control of ZnO Morphology via a Simple
Solution Route. Chem. Mater, 14, 4172–4177 (2002).
13. Dos Santos, A. M., Cheetham, A. K., Tian, W., Pan, X.,
Jia, Y., Murphy, N. J., Lettieri, J., and Schlom, D. G.
Adsorption-controlled growth of BiMnO3 films by
molecular-beam epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 91 (2004).
16. Fen, W., Chang-Hui, L., Tao, Z., Yi, L. and Young, S.
Electrically driven magnetic relaxation in multiferroic
LuFe 2 O 4. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter., 22, 496001 (2010).
21. Fujimura, N., Sakata H., Ito D., Yoshimura T., Yokota
T. and Ito T. Ferromagnetic and ferroelectric behaviors of
A-site substituted YMnO 3 -based epitaxial thin films. J.
Appl. Phys., 93, 6990 (2003).
30. Huang, Z. J., Cao, Y., Sun, Y. Y., Xue, Y. Y., and Chu,
C. W. Coupling between the ferroelectric and
antiferromagnetic orders in YMnO 3. Phys. Rev. B, 56, 2623
(1997).
31. Hua, Ma, Lang, Chen, Junling, Wang, J. Ma, and Boey, F.
Strain effects and thickness dependence of ferroelectric
properties in epitaxial BiFeO 3 thin films. Appl. Phys.
Lett., 92, 182902 (2008).
32. Hur, N., Park, S., Sharma, P. A, Guha, S., and Cheong,
S W. Colossal Magnetodielectric Effects in DyMn 2 O 5 .
Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 107207 (2004).
33. Hur, N., Park, S., Sharma, P. A., Ahn, J. S., Guha, S.,
and Cheong, S. W. Electric polarization reversal and memory
in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields.
Nature, 429, 392 (2004).
35. Ikeda, N., Kohn, K., Kito, H., Akimitsu, J., and
Siratori, K. Anisotropy of Dielectric Dispersion in ErFe 2
O 4 Single Crystal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 1371 (1995).
37. Jang, S. Y., Lee, D., Lee, J. H., Noh, T. W., Jo, Y.,
Jung, M. H., and Chung, J. S. Oxygen vacancy induced
re-entrant spin glass behavior in multiferroic ErMnO 3
thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett., 93, 162507 (2008).
42. Kimura, T., Kobayashi, S., Wakimoto, S., Noda, Y., and
Kohn, K. Magnetically induced ferroelectricity in
multiferroic compounds of RMn 2 O 5 . Ferroelectrics, 354,
77 (2007).
43. Lakovlev, S., Solterbeck, C. H., Kuhnke, M., and
Es-Souni, M. Multiferroic BiFeO 3 thin films processed
via chemical solution deposition: Structural and electrical
characterization. J. Appl. Phys., 97, 094901 (2005).
47. Martin, L. W., Zhan, Q., Suzuki, Y., Ramesh, R., Chi,
M., Browning, N., Mizoguchi, T., and Kreisel, J. Growth
and structure of PbVO 3 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett., 90,
062903 (2007).
57. Naoshi, I., Hiroyuki, O., Kenji, O., Kenji I., Toshiya,
I., Kazuhisa, K., Youichi, M., Kenji, Y., Shigeo, M.,
Yoichi, H., and Hijiri, K. Ferroelectricity from iron
valence ordering in the charge-frustrated system LuFe 2 O
4 . Nature, 436, 1136 (2005).
61. Posadas, A., Yau, J. B., Ahn, C. H., Han, J., Gariglio,
S., Johnston, K., Rabe, K. M., and Neaton, J. B. Epitaxial
growth of multiferroic YMnO 3 on GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett.,
87, 171915 ( 2005).
64. Rai, R. C., Delmont, A., Sprow, A., Cai, B., and
Nakarmi, M. L. Spin-charge-orbital coupling in multiferroic
LuFe 2 O 4 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett., 100, 212904
(2012).
69. Ryu, J., Priya, S., Carazo, A. V., Uchino, K., and Kim,
H. Magnetoelectric Properties in Piezoelectric and
Magnetostrictive Laminate Composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,
84, 2905 (2001).
71. Ryan, C., Hongxue, L., Mikhail, K., Richard, K., Jiwei,
Lu, and Stuart, A. Wolf. Directed Self-Assembly of
Epitaxial CoFe 2 O 4 –BiFeO 3 Multiferroic Nanocomposites.
Nano Lett., 12, 2367 (2012).
86. Suzuki, K., Fu, D., Nishizawa, K., Miki, T., and Kato,
K. Ferroelectric Property of AlkoxyDerived YMnO 3 Films
Crystallized in Argon Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 42, 5692 (2003).
94. Xie, S. H., Li, J. Y., Liu, Y. Y., Lan, L. N., Jin, G.,
and Zhou, Y. C. Electrospinning and multiferroic
properties of NiFe 2 O 4 –Pb(Zr 0.52 Ti 0.48 )O 3
composite nanofibers. J. Appl. Phys., 104, 024115 (2008).
95. Xingsong, G., Brian, J. R., Lifeng, L., Balaji, B.,
Daniel, P., Michael, Z., Marin, A., and Dietrich, H.
Microstructure and properties of well-ordered multiferroic
Pb (Zr, Ti) O 3 / CoFe 2 O 4 nanocomposites. Nano, 1099
(2010).
97. Yangxue, Ye, Huiqing, Fan, and Jin, Li. Fabrication and
texture evolution of hexagonal YMnO 3 nanofibers by
electrospinning. Materials Letters, 64, 419 (2010).
98. Yan, L. H., Liang, W. Z., Liu, S. H., Huang, W., and
Lin, Y. Multiferroic BaTiO 3 -CoFe 2 O 4 Nano Composite
Thin Films Grown by Polymer-Assisted Deposition. Integr.
Ferroelectr., 131, 82 (2011).
99. Yang, C. H., Seidel, J., Kim, S. Y., Rossen, B., Yu,
P., Gajek, M., Chu, Y. H., Martin, L. W., Holcomb, M. B.,
He, Q., Maksymovych, P., Balk, S. V. Kalinin., Baddorf, A.
P., Basu, S. R., Scullin, M. L., and Ramesh, R. Electric
modulation of conduction in multiferroic Ca-doped BiFeO 3
films. Nature Materials, 8, 485 (2009).
102. Zavaliche, F., Zhao, T., Zheng, H., Straub, F., Cruz,
M. P., Yang. P. L., Hao, D., and Ramesh, R. Electrically
assisted magnetic recording in multiferroic nanostructures.
Nano Lett., 7, 1586 (2007).
106. Zhao, T., Zheng, H., Straub, F., Cruz, M. P., Yang, P.
L., Hao, D., and Ramesh, R. Electrically assisted magnetic
recording in multiferroic nanostructures. Nano Lett., 7,
1586 (2007).
7. Ali, M. E.; Hashim, U.; Mustafa, S.; Che Man, Y. B., and
Islam, Kh N. Journal of Nanomaterials, (2012). Article ID
103607.
37. Fan, R., Kamik, R., Yue, M., Li, D., Majumdar, A, and
Yang, P. DNA translocation in inorganic nanotubes. Nano
Lett, 5, 1633–7 (2005).
61. Morrow, K. John, (Jr, PhDa), Bawa, Raj (MS, PhD b,c,d),
and Wei, Chiming (MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FAANe). Recent
Advances in Basic and Clinical Nanomedicine, Med Clin N
Am, 91 805–843 (2007).
62. Kong, L. X. and Peng, Z. Nanotechnology and its role in
the management of periodontal diseases. Periodontology
2000, 40, 184–196 (2006).
84. Nie, Shuming, Xing, Yun Kim, Gloria J., and Simmons,
Jonathan W. ."Nanotechnology Applications in Cancer".
Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 9, 257–88 (2007).
doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.152025.
96. Peng, G., Tisch, U., Adams, O., Hakim, M., Shehada, N.,
Broza, Y. Y., Bilan, S., AbdahBortnyak, R., Kuten, A., and
Haick, H. Nature Nanotech., 4, 669–673 (2009).
105. Ruehm, S. G., Corot, C., Vogt, P., Kolb, S., and
Debatin. J. F. Magnetic resonance imaging of
atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic
particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits.
Circulation., 103, 415–422 (2001).
16. Chou, T. W., Gao, L., Thostenson, E. T., Zhang, Z., and
Byun, J. H. An Assessment of the Science and Technology of
Carbon Nanotube Fibers and Composites. Composites Science
and Technology, 70(1), 1–19 (2010).
32. Kis, A., Jensen, K., Aloni, S., Mickelson, W., and
Zettl, A. Interlayer forces and ultra low sliding friction
in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters,
97(2), 025501 (2006).
36.
42. Mielke, S. L., Troya, D., Zhang, S., Li, J. L., Xiao,
S., Car, R., Ruoff, R. S., Schatz, G. C., and Belytschko,
T. The role of vacancy defects and holes in the fracture of
carbon nanotubes. Chemical Physics Letters, 390(4–6),
413–420 (2004).
64. Suehiro, J., Imakiire, H., Hidaka, S., Ding, W., Zhou,
G., Imasaka, K., and Hara, M. Schottky-type response of
carbon nanotube NO 2 gas sensor fabricated onto aluminum
electrodes by dielectrophoresis. Sensors and Actuators B:
Chemical, 114(2), 943–949 (2006).
77. Yu, M. F., Lourie, O., Dyer, M. J., Molony, K., Kelly,
T. F., and Ruoff, R. S. Strength and Breaking Mechanism of
Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes under Tensile Load. Science,
287(5453), 637–640 (2000).
82. Zou, J., Huang, X., Arroyo, M., and Zhang, S. Effective
coarse-grained simulations of super-thick multi-walled
carbon nanotubes under torsion. Journal of Applied Physics,
105(3), 033516 (2009).
11 CHAPTER 11: RECENT ADVANCES IN
NANOMEDICINE: APPLICATIONS IN DIAGNOSIS
AND THERAPEUTICS
4. Alili, L., Sack, M., von, Montfort, C., Giri, S., Das,
S., Carroll, K. S., Zanger, K., Seal, S., and Brenneisen,
P. Downregulation of Tumor Growth and Invasion by
Redox-Active Nanoparticles. Antioxid Redox Signal, 24
(Jan, 2013) [Epub ahead of print].
62. Gao, W., Xiao, Z., Radovic-Moreno, A., Shi, J., Langer,
R., and Farokhzad, O. C. Progress in siRNA delivery using
multifunctional nanoparticles. Methods Mol Biol., 629,
53–67 (2010).
67. Godin, B., Tasciotti, E., Liu, X., Serda, R. E., and
Ferrari, M. Multistage nanovectors, from concept to novel
imaging contrast agents and therapeutics. Acc Chem Res.,
44(10), 979–989 (Oct 18, 2011) Epub 2011 Sep 8.
70. Gorityala, B. K., Ma, J., Wang, X., Chen, P., and Liu,
X. W. Carbohydrate functionalized carbon nanotubes and
their applications. Chem Soc Rev., 39(8), 2925–2934 (Aug,
2010) Epub 2010 Jun 28.
73. Guo, J. S., Leung, K. K. G., Su, H. X., Yuan, Q., Wang,
L., Chu, T. H., Zhang, W. M., Pu, J. K. S., Ng, G. K. P.,
Wong, W. M., Dai, X., and Wu, W. L. Self-assembling peptide
nanofi ber scaffold promotes the reconstruction of acutely
injured brain. Nanomedicine, Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 5,
345–351 (2009).
75. http,//
www.dst.gov.in/about_us/ar07–08/nano-mission.htm.
76. Huang, G., Chen, H., Dong, Y., Luo, X., Yu, H., Moore,
Z., Bey, E. A., Boothman, D. A., and Gao, J.
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles, Amplifying ROS
Stress to Improve Anticancer Drug Efficacy, 3(2), 116–126
(2013) doi, 10.7150/thno.5411. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
81. Jatariu, A., Peptu, C., Popa, M., and Indrei, A. Micro
and nanoparticles medical applications. Rev Med Chir Soc
Med Nat Iasi., 113(4), 1160–1169 (Oct–Dec, 2009).
89. Kang, H. G., Tokumasu, F., Clarke, M., Zhou, Z., Tang,
J., Nguyen, T., and Hwang, J. Probing dynamic fluorescence
properties of single and clustered quantum dots toward
quantitative biomedical imaging of cells. Wiley Interdiscip
Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol., 2(1), 48–58 (Jan-Feb, 2010).
96. Kim, A. J., Boylan, N. J., Suk, J. S., Hwangbo, M., Yu,
T., Schuster, B. S., Cebotaru, L., Lesniak, W. G., Oh, J.
S., Adstamongkonkul, P., Choi, A. Y., Kannan, R. M., and
Hanes, J. Use of Single-Site-Functionalized PEG Dendrons
to Prepare Gene Vectors that Penetrate Human Mucus
Barriers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl., (Mar 4, 2013) doi,
10.1002/ anie.201208556. [Epub ahead of print].
106. Lee, J. E., Lee, N., Kim, T., Kim, J., and Hyeon, T.
Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanocomposite
nanoparticles for theranostic applications. Acc Chem Res.,
44(10), 893– 902 (Oct 18, 2011) Epub 2011 Aug 17.
114. Lin, M. M., Kim, do K., El, Haj A. J., and Dobson, J.
Development of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
(SPIONS) for translation to clinical applications. IEEE
Trans Nanobioscience., 7(4), 298–305 (Dec, 2008).
118. Maham, A., Tang, Z., Wu, H., Wang, J., and Lin, Y.
Protein-based nanomedicine platforms for drug delivery.
Small, 5(15), 1706–1721 (Aug 3, 2009).
132. Nel, A. E., Madler, L., Velegol, D., Xia, T., Hoek, E.
M., Somasundaran, P., Klaessig, F., Castranova, V., and
Thompson, M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions
at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater., 8(7), 543–557 (Jul,
2009) Epub 2009 Jun 14.
141. Petry, H., Goldmann, C., Ast, O., and Lüke, W. The use
of virus-like particles for gene transfer. Current Opinion
in Molecular Therapeutics, 5(5), 524–528 (October, 2003).
168. Shi, X., Zhang, X., Xia, T., and Fang, X. Living cell
study at the single-molecule and single-cell levels by
atomic force microscopy. Nanomedicine (Lond)., 7(10),
1625–1637 (Oct, 2012) doi, 10.2217/nnm.12.130.
175. Swierczewska, M., Lee, S., and Chen, X. The design and
application of fluorophore-gold nanoparticle activatable
probes. Phys Chem Chem Phys., 13(21), 9929–9941 (Jun 7,
2011) Epub 2011 Mar 7.
180. Tanner, P., Baumann, P., Enea, R., Onaca, O., Palivan,
C., and Meier, W. Polymeric vesicles, from drug carriers to
nanoreactors and artificial organelles. Acc Chem Res.,
44(10), 1039–1049 (Oct 18, 2011) Epub 2011 May 24.
181. Tao, L., Hu, W., Liu, Y., Huang, G., Sumer, B. D., and
Gao, J. Shape-specific polymeric nanomedicine, emerging
opportunities and challenges. Exp Biol Med (Maywood).,
236(1), 20–29 (Jan, 2011).
185. Tong, S., Cradick, T. J., Ma, Y., Dai, Z., and Bao, G.
Engineering imaging probes and molecular machines for
nanomedicine. Sci China Life Sci., 55(10), 843–861 (Oct,
2012) doi, 10.1007/s11427–012–4380–1. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
194. Wang, K., Wu, X., Wang, J., and Huang, J. Cancer stem
cell theory, therapeutic implications for nanomedicine. Int
J Nanomedicine, 8, 899–908 (2013) doi, 10.2147/IJN.S38641.
Epub 2013 Feb 28.
195. Wang, M., Abbineni, G., Clevenger, A., Mao, C., and
Xu, S. Upconversion nanoparticles, synthesis, surface
modification and biological applications. Nanomedicine,
7(6), 710–729 (Dec, 2011) Epub 2011 Mar 17.
197. Wong, K. K. Y., Tian, J., Ho, C. M., Lok, C. N., Che,
C. M., Chiu, J. F., and Tam, P. K. H. Topical delivery of
silver nanoparticles reduces systemic inflammation of burn
and promotes wound healing. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol.
Med., 2, 306 (2006).
199. Wu, Z., Tang, L. J., Zhang, X. B., Jiang, J. H., and
Tan, W. Aptamer-modified nanodrug delivery systems. ACS
Nano, 5(10), 7696–7699 (Oct 25, 2011).
3. Benito, S., Graff, A., Stoenescu, R., Broz, P., Saw, C.,
Heider, H., Marsch, S., Hunziker, P., and Meier, W.
Polymer nanocontainers for biomedical applications.
European Cells and Materials, 6(1), 21–22 (2003).
10. Hu, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, Q., Zhang, L., Jiang, X., and
Yang, C. Synthesis and stimuli-responsive properties of
chitosan/poly (acrylic acid) hollow nanospheres. Polymer,
46(26), 12703–12710 (2005).
12. Jose, E., Pereira, S., Susana, I., Cordoba, T., and
Roberto, M. T. Polyaniline acrylic coatings for corrosion
inhibition the role played by counter-ions. Corrosion
Science, 47(3), 811–822 (2005).
18. Lu, X., Yu, Y., Chen, L., Mao, H., Wang, L., Zhang, W.,
and Wei, Y. Poly (acrylic acid)guided synthesis of helical
polyaniline microwires. Polymer, 46(14), 5329–5333 (2005).
30. Ryu, J. H., Yoon, J. W., Lim, C. S., Oh, W. C., and
Shim, K. B. Microwave-assisted synthesis of camoo 4
nano-powders by a citrate complex method and its
photoluminescence property. Journal of Alloys and
Compound, 390(1–2), 245–249 (2005).
41. Yang, J., Lee, J., Kang, J., Lee, K., Suh, J., Yoon,
H., Huh, Y., and Haam, S. Hollow silica nanocontainers as
drug delivery vehicles. Langmuir, 24(7), 3417–3421 (2008).
12. Fu, Nian Qing, Xiao, Xurui, Zhou, Xiaowon, Zhang, Jing
Bo, and Lin, Yuan. Electrodeposition of Platinum on Plastic
Substrates as Counter Electrodes for Flexible
Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry
C., 116, 2850–2857 (2012).
14. Griep, Mark. H., Walczak, Karl. A., Winder, Eric. M.,
Lueking, Donald. R., and Friedrich, Craig. R. Quantum dot
enhancement of bacteriorhodopsin-based electrodes.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 25, 1493–1497 (2010).
16. Han, Jishu, Zhang, Hao, Tang, Yue, Liu, Yi, Yao Xi, and
Yang, Bai. Role of Redox Reaction and Electrostatics in
Transition-Metal Impurity-Promoted Photoluminescence
Evolution of Water-Soluble ZnSe Nanocrystals. J. Phys.
Chem. C., 113(18), 7503–7510 (2009).
17. Hardin, Brian E., Hoke1, Eric T., Armstrong, Paul B.,
Yum, Jun-Ho, Comte, Pascal, Torres, Toma´s, Fre´chet, Jean
M. J., Nazeeruddin, Md Khaja, Gratzel, Michael, and
McGehee, Michael D. Increased light harvesting in
dye-sensitized solar cells with energy relay dyes. Nature
Photonics, 3, 406–411 (2009).
47. Zhang, Yan-Zhen, Jao, Xia, Wang, Li-Xin, Xu, Hui, Hou,
Qian, Zhou, Wei-Lie, and Chen, Jian-Feng. Novel ZnO-Based
Film with Double Light-Scattering Layers as Photoelectrodes
for Enhanced Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.
Chemistry of Materials, 22(3), 928–934 (2010).
48. Zhou, H., Wu, L., Gao, Y., and Ma, T. Dye-sensitized
solar cells using 20 natural dyes as sensitizers. J.
Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemisry, 219, 188–194
(2011).