Scribd
Upload
253 views2 pages

Centaur Pharmaceuticals PVT LTD and Anr V Stanford Laboratories PVT LTD 407278

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions filed against a High Court order. The High Court had extended the limitation period for filing a written statement in a case and allowed the respondent's written statement to be taken on record. The Supreme Court found no error in the High Court's decision as the limitation period could have been extended up to October 7, 2021 based on previous Supreme Court orders. Therefore, the Court saw no reason to interfere with the High Court order.

Uploaded by

Madhusudan Reddy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
253 views2 pages

Centaur Pharmaceuticals PVT LTD and Anr V Stanford Laboratories PVT LTD 407278

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions filed against a High Court order. The High Court had extended the limitation period for filing a written statement in a case and allowed the respondent's written statement to be taken on record. The Supreme Court found no error in the High Court's decision as the limitation period could have been extended up to October 7, 2021 based on previous Supreme Court orders. Therefore, the Court saw no reason to interfere with the High Court order.

Uploaded by

Madhusudan Reddy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

WWW.LIVELAW.

IN
1

ITEM NOS.29+30 Court 12 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17298/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-04-2021


in AN No. 2056/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
Madras)

CENTAUR PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STANFORD LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

WITH

SLP (C) No. 17927/2021


(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No. 141805/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM
FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 04-01-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH


HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Subramani, Adv.


Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR
Mr. Navneet R. Adv.
Ms. Sonali Jain, Adv.
Ms. Vasudha Jain, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR
Ms. Bitika Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Luv Virmani, Adv.
Ms. Aadya Chawla, Adv.
Mr. Pranav Saigal, Adv.

Mr. Adarsh Ramanujan, Adv.


Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR
Ms. Bitika Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Luv Virmani, Adv.
Ms. Aadya Chawla, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
2

Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties,

we are of the opinion that, in the facts and circumstances of the

case, the High Court has not committed any error in extending the

period of limitation in filing the written statement and

consequently taking on record the written statement filed on behalf

of the respondent-original defendant.

Even as held by this Court in the subsequent orders even the

period of limitation which could have been extended and/or condoned

by the Tribunal/Court is excluded and/or extended even up to

07.10.2021.

In that view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere with

the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. Hence,

the Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed. Consequent upon the

dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions, the interim order passed

by this Court stands vacated.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

(R. NATARAJAN) (VIRENDER SINGH)


ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER

You might also like