0% found this document useful (0 votes)
183 views30 pages

Coke Drum Repair Techniques

The document summarizes the largest coke drum bulge repairs in industry history that were conducted at Reliance Industries in Jamnagar, India. It provides technical background on shell bulging and cracking issues in coke drums. It then describes the implementation of controlled-deposition welding repairs to over 3350 square feet of surface area across multiple locations in eight coke drums. The repairs successfully controlled further bulge growth.

Uploaded by

Nano Quinn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
183 views30 pages

Coke Drum Repair Techniques

The document summarizes the largest coke drum bulge repairs in industry history that were conducted at Reliance Industries in Jamnagar, India. It provides technical background on shell bulging and cracking issues in coke drums. It then describes the implementation of controlled-deposition welding repairs to over 3350 square feet of surface area across multiple locations in eight coke drums. The repairs successfully controlled further bulge growth.

Uploaded by

Nano Quinn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

THE LARGEST COKE DRUM

BULGE REPAIRS IN INDUSTRY


HISTORY
Amish Jani
Asst. Vice President (Corrosion & Inspection),
Reliance Industries Ltd., Jamnagar
+91-9998214992
[email protected]

Mahmod Samman, Ph.D., P.E.


President
Houston Engineering Solutions, LLC
+1-832-512-0109
[email protected]

New Delhi, India • October 2013


Overview
• Technical Background.
• Repair implementation.

www.hes.us.com 2
Technical Background

www.hes.us.com 3
History of Shell Bulging & Cracking
• Major problem for
decades.
• Despite design
improvements, still
a problem- perhaps
more severe today.

Courtesy of CB&I

www.hes.us.com 4
API Surveys
• 1968 Survey:
– Carbon steel drums bulged far more extensively
than C-Mo drums before giving through-wall
cracks.
• 1996 Survey:
– 97% said cracks were primarily circumferential.
– 57% reported shell bulging. Of the drums that
bulged, 87% cracked.

www.hes.us.com 5
Bulging Types
There are different types of bulges that are
created by different mechanisms and should be
treated differently:
• Circumferential welds (especially w/ thickness
change)
• Middle of drum
• In plates away from welds

www.hes.us.com 6
Bulging-Induced Cracks
• Bulging-only
• Combination of
bulging and weld
defect
• Combination of
bulging and weld-base
mismatch

www.hes.us.com 7
Bulging-Induced Cracks
INTERIOR

EXTERIOR

www.hes.us.com 8
Consequences of Bulging
• PRIMARY: Excessive strain
Local failure
Initiation of bulging cracks
Strain age embrittlement.
• SECONDARY: Increase in nominal stress
More fatigue damage
Accelerated propagation of cracks
• Leaks and fires

www.hes.us.com 9
Bulging Assessment
per API-579 / ASME-FFS
• Level 1: N/A to coke drums
• Level 2: Does not exist
• Level 3: Infeasible and costly process

www.hes.us.com 10
Industry Practice
• Stress analysis (1st generation)
• Geometric analysis (2nd generation)
• Strain analysis (3rd generation)

www.hes.us.com 11
Strain Analysis
• Plastic Strain Index (PSI)TM
• Based on failure limit of industry standard API
579/ ASME FFS
• Focuses on primary mode of failure.
• Excellent correlation with bulging cracks.

www.hes.us.com 12
PSI Analysis
• Four-tier severity system: Design, Concern,
Danger, and Failure.
• Used to determine likelihood of bulging-induced
cracking and frequency of laser scanning.
• Can be used for other pressure vessels with bulges
of similar failure modes.
PSI Severity Likelihood of Recommended
magnitude Grade Bulging-Induced Frequency of Laser
Cracks Scanning
80% to 100% Failure Likely 6 months to 1 year
60% to 80% Danger Probable 1 year
40% to 60% Concern Possible 1 to 2 years
0 to 40% Design Unlikely 2 to 3 years

www.hes.us.com 13
Radius Map
Various degrees of ovality circled

Excessive cracking Localized Bulge


Cracking

www.hes.us.com 14
Plastic Strain Index (PSI)

Negligible
impact of ovality High Severity at crack sites
on PSI results

www.hes.us.com 15
PSI Trend => Repair Need

www.hes.us.com 16
Common Types of Bulge Repairs
• Window replacement
• Can replacement
• Weld overlays
– Internal
– External
– Sandwich

www.hes.us.com 17
Window Replacement
• Advantages
– Simplest
– Least expensive
• Disadvantages
– Fit-up stresses
– Two-way material mismatch
– Short-term repair

www.hes.us.com 18
Can Replacement
• Advantages
– Better than window replacement
– Effective solution for
• Diagonal bulging
• Extensive widespread cracking
• Remote locations
• Disadvantages
– Fit-up stresses
– One-way material mismatch
– Medium-term repair

www.hes.us.com 19
Advantages of Weld Overlay Repair
• Advantages:
– Lower nominal stresses under mechanical loads.
– Favorable residual stresses on application surface.
– Possible reduction of bulging severity.
– Most effective and longest-lasting repair, if designed and applied
properly.
• Disadvantages:
– Need good automated procedure.
– Unfavorable low tensile residual stresses.
– Need proper engineering to handle potential for:
• Instability / buckling
• Excessive distortion.
• Impact of transition stress riser on fatigue life.
• Excessive thermal expansion stresses from repaired zone expanding differently
from rest of wall.
• Ratcheting in thinner wall that could result in generation of new bulges.

www.hes.us.com 20
Buckling / Local Failure

www.hes.us.com 21
Non-symmetric Distortion

www.hes.us.com 22
Repair Implementation

www.hes.us.com 23
Time History
• 08 coke drums commissioned in 1998
• Drums are 1.25Cr0.5Mo/SS410 clad

• Shell bulges monitoring since 2001


• Bulges >3” since 2007
• First shell crack: Apr2009 (2500cycles)
• First throughwall crack: Feb2010 (2740cycles)
• BOL repairs started: June2010
• Approx cycles:3650 Oct13
www.hes.us.com 24
Scope of Repairs
• Total repairs with Controlled-Deposition
Welding (CDW, without PWHT)

• Total Surface Area BOL repairs: 3350sqft

• Max size single location BOL repairs: 663sqft


(2.2m x 28m)

www.hes.us.com 25
Inspection requirements
Preparatory
• Repair specific PQR: Hardness, Toughness, Microstructure
• Mock-up with approved WPS/PQR: I, V, S

Site execution
• Mapping+Marking
• Clad layer removal – Cu Sulfate test (A380)
• Thickness check, Base line diameter measurements
• BOL as per approved WPS: Surface finish at edges/interface, PMI, Thk,
Fluorescent DPT, Distortion measurements, Taper edges 10:1, hardness
limits for overlay/interface/HAZ

www.hes.us.com 26
Challenges
• Overall process safety, Planning and scheduling for drum-pair repairs, with
other drums in line.
• WPS/PQR: CDW with 3layers min, hardness control
• Quality welders/operators specific to CDW requirements
• Working crew within one single confined space
• Simultaneous repairs for multiple locations in a drum
• Mapping/marking on drum wall
• Distortion measurements
• Controlling WPS parameters during execution at site
• Prediction of subsequent bulge growth
• Residual stress control
• Expected life post repairs, esp due to shake-down effect

www.hes.us.com 27
Photographs

Typical Shell Map with repair areas on Typical Shell cross section:
shell courses as-is/post-repairs

Confidential:
This slide cannot be reproduced in any form without written permission from RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED.

www.hes.us.com 28
Photographs

Typical bulge overlay repairs inside of the coke drum

Confidential:
This slide cannot be reproduced in any form without written permission from RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED.

www.hes.us.com 29
Performance
• Bulge growth under control, steady.

www.hes.us.com 30

You might also like