Protecting Vulnerable Witnesses in Court
Protecting Vulnerable Witnesses in Court
Sonia Kinra
ADJ-cum-Faculty Member
Chandigarh Judicial Academy
*By Act 43 of 1983, there were amendments in Section 375,
376 of IPC and Section 114A was inserted in Evidence Act
and consequently sub sections (2) and (3) were added in
section 327 of Cr.P.C. Owing to the nature of the offence of
rape, as per sub sections (2) and (3) of Section 327 Cr.P.C.,
the trial has to be conducted in-camera and the
proceedings of the said trial have been forbidden to be
printed or published except with the previous permission of
the court.
*
* Keeping in view the amendments in section 375 and 376 IPC, section
114-A Evidence Act and sub section 2 and 3 to section 327 Cr.P.C to
conduct the inquiry of Rape or an offence under sections 376, 376A,
376B, 376C or 376D in camera and requirement of the permission of
the court to publish such matter, it was held that the courts are
obliged to act in furtherance of the intention expressed by the
legislature and not to ignore its mandate and must take recourse to
the provisions of section 327(2) and (3) CrPC and hold the trial of
Rape cases in camera, where trials are held in camera it would not
be lawful any person to print or publish any matter concerning the
proceedings in the case except with the previous permission of the
court. This would save any further embarrassment to the victim of sex
crime. Wherever possible it would be worth considering whether It
would be more desirable that the cases of sexual assault on the
females are tried by Lady Judges wherever available. The courts
should as far as possible, avoid disclosing the name of prosecutrix in
their orders.
*
* The Apex Court in para no. 34 held as follows :
(1) The provisions of sub section (2) of Section 327 Cr.P.C. shall, in
addition to the offences mentioned in the sub section, also
apply in inquiry or trial of offences under sections 354 and 377
IPC.
(2) In holding trial of child sex abuse or rape;
i. A screen or some such arrangements may be made where the
victim or witness (who may be equally vulnerable like the victim)
does not see the body or face of the accused.
ii. The questions put in cross examination on behalf of the accused,
insofar as they relate directly to the incident, should be given in
writing to the Presiding Officer of the Court who may put them to
the victim or witnesses in a language which is clear and is not
embarrassing;
iii. The victim of child abuse or rape, while giving testimony in Court,
should be allowed sufficient breaks as and when required;
*
*The Delhi High Court reiterated the guidelines issued
through different judgments and added some more
involving a child victim or child witness. The said
directions were to Police, Magistrate for recording
statement, Doctors for medical examination and Court
for recording evidence of the child witness and some
other general guidelines. On the basis of this judgment,
the guidelines for recording of the deposition of
vulnerable witness were framed by Hon’ble Delhi High
Court.
*
*Directionissued by the Apex Court for establishment
of special centres for examination of vulnerable
witnesses in criminal cases in the interest of
conducive environment in court for recording
statements of vulnerable witnesses. It was dwelt on
the guidelines issued by the High Court of Delhi for
recording the evidence of the vulnerable witnesses
in criminal matters and noted that special centres
have been set up in Delhi for that purpose.
*
* The Apex Court adopted Witness Protection Scheme,
2018 in its entirety.
*The directions laid down in the case of State of
Maharashtra Vs. Bandu supra for setting up of special
centres for examination of vulnerable witnesses in
criminal cases have been again stressed upon.
*
*The Hon‘ble Apex Court while hearing the miscellaneous
application as to wider issue on the need to set up
vulnerable witness courtrooms in compliance to the
decision of the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra
vs. Bandu has widen the definition of vulnerable
witnesses and has issued the directions to all the High
Courts for setting up the vulnerable witness deposition
centres and to frame guidelines on deposition of
vulnerable witnesses on the basis of guidelines framed
by Hon‘ble Delhi High Court.
*
*It has been clarified that the definition of vulnerable
witness contained in clause 3 of VWDC (Vulnerable
Witness Deposition Centres) scheme formulated by the
Delhi High Court shall not be limited only to child
witnesses who have not attained the age of 18 years
and would be expanded to include interalia the
following categories of vulnerable witnesses –
a) Age neutral victims of sexual assault read with section 273 and
327 of the Cr.P.C. and section 354 of the IPC;
b) Gender neutral victims of sexual assault read with section 2 (d) of
the POCSO Act;
c) Age and gender neutral victims of sexual assault under section 377
IPC read with paragraph 34(1) of the decision in Sakshi vs. Union
of India.
d) Witnesses suffering from mental illness as defined under section
2(s) of the Mental Healthcare Act of 2017 read with section 118
of the Indian Evidence Act;
e) Any witness deemed to have threat perception under the Witness
Protection Scheme of the Union Government as approved by the
Supreme Court in Mahendra Chawla vs. Union of India (2019) 14
SCC 615;
f) Any speech or hearing impaired individual or a person suffering
from any other disability who is considered to be a vulnerable
witness by the competent Court ;
g) Any other witnesses deemed to be vulnerable by the Court
concerned.
* On 08.04.2022, in Misc. Application No. 1582/2019 in Criminal
Appeal NO. 1101 of 2019 in case of S. Tukaram Badade vs. The
State of Maharashtra and Ors., Hon‘ble Apex Court, on
submission of report by Hon‘ble Ms. Justice Gita Mittal
accepted the suggestion that the use of VWDCs should, in
addition to criminal cases, be allowed for other jurisdictions
including civil jurisdictions, Family Courts, Juvenile Justice
Boards and Children‘s Courts and permission has been granted
for recording the evidence of vulnerable witnesses in cases
across all jurisdictions.
*
OBJECTIVES OF THE GUIDELINES
*
Definitions of Important Terms
defined under Clause 3 of the
Guidelines :
a. Vulnerable Witness – is a child who has not completed 18 years of age (in
the case of Smruti Tukaram supra, the Apex Court has widen this term by
including
(a) Age Neutral Victims of Sexual Assault read with section 273 and 327
Cr.P.C and Section 354 of IPC.
(b) The gender neutral victim of sexual assault read with section 2(d) of
POCSO Act, 2012.
(c) Age and gender neutral victims of sexual assault under section 377 IPC
read with paragraph 34(1) of the decision in case of Sakshi
(d) Witness suffering from (mental illness) as defined under section 2(s) of
Mental Health Care Act, 2017 r/w Section 118 of IEA, 1872
(e) (Any witness deemed to have a threat perception under the Witness
Protection Scheme, 2018 of Union Government as approved by this court
in Mahender Chawla Vs. Union of India
(f) Any speech or hearing impaired individual or a person suffering from
any other disability who is considered to be a vulnerable witness by the
competent court; and
(g) Any other witness deemed to be vulnerable by the concerned court
b. Support Person – Means and includes guardian ad litem, legal aid
lawyer, facilitators, interpreters, translators and any other person
appointed by court or any other person appointed by the court to
provide support, accompany and assist the vulnerable witness to
testify or attend judicial proceedings.
d. Concealment of Identity of witness – Means and includes any
condition prohibiting publication of the name, address and other
particulars which may lead to the identity of the witness.
g. Comfort Items – Comfort items mean any article which shall have a
calming effect on a vulnerable witness at the time of deposition and
may include stuffed toy, blanket or book.
h. Competence of a vulnerable Witness – Every vulnerable witness shall
be competent to testify unless the Court considers that they are
prevented from understanding the questions put to them, or from
giving rational answers to those questions due to tender years,
disease, either of body or mind, or any other cause of the same kind.
Explanation: A mentally ill person may also be held competent unless
he is prevented by his lunacy to understand questions.
However, a mentally ill person may also be held competent unless
prevented by his lunacy to understand questions.
i. Court House Tour – A pre-trial tour of court room to familiarize
a vulnerable witness with the environment and the basic process
of adjudication and roles of each Court official.
k. Live Link – ‗Live link‗ means and includes a live television
link, audio-video electronic means or other arrangement whereby
a witness, while absent from the courtroom is nevertheless
present in the court room by remote communication using
technology to give evidence and be cross-examined.
n. Secondary Victimization – means victimization that occurs
not as a direct result of a criminal act but through the response
of institutions and individuals to the victim.
o. Revictimization – means a situation in which a person suffers
more than one criminal incident over a period of time.
p. Waiting Room – A safe place for vulnerable witnesses where
they can wait. It shall have toys, books, TV, etc. which can help
them lower their anxiety.
Guardian ad litem
* The Court may appoint any person, may be a member of
Bar/Practicing Advocate except a person who is a witness in
any proceeding involving the child as guardian ad litem either
to a victim or a witness to a crime.
(iv) assist the vulnerable witness and his family in coping with the
emotional effects of crime and subsequent criminal or non-
criminal proceedings in which the child is involved;
(v) remain with the vulnerable witness while the vulnerable witness
waits to testify;
Support person
*Ordinarilya neutral person other than a parent shall be
appointed as a support person. Only in exceptional
circumstances, the Court should appoint a parent as a
support person.
May accompany a child to the witness He shall not obstruct the view of the
stand. child to the opposite party or the
Judge
May be allowed to hold the hand of He cannot prompt, sway or influence
vulnerable witness the witness during testimony
(ii) court officials (what their roles are and where they sit);
(iii) who else might be in the Court, for example those in the public gallery;
(vii) discussion of any particular fears or concerns with the intermediaries, prosecutors
and the Judge to dispel the fear, trauma and anxiety in connection with the
prospective deposition at Court.
(viii) demonstration of any special measures applied for and/or granted, for example
practicing on the live link and explaining who will be able to see them in the
courtroom, and showing the use of screens (where it is practical and convenient to
do so)
* Separate furnished waiting areas for vulnerable witnesses with the
support person and lawyer, if any.
* The child may be allowed to testify from a place other than the
witness chair, which could be turned to facilitate his testimony but
the opposing party must have a frontal or a profile view of the child
even by a video link during testimony of the child.
*
*The testimony of the vulnerable witness should be
recorded when he is well rested
*Comfortable
Environment
*Before the evidence of a vulnerable witness, the
Judge suo motu after recording the reasons or on
application of either party may meet a vulnerable
witness in the presence of the prosecution and defence
lawyer or in their absence for explaining the Court
process to the witness.
Competency of vulnerable witness:-
Every vulnerable witness shall be presumed to be qualified as a
witness unless prevented by the following-
(a) age
(b) physicalor mental disability leading to recording a finding
of doubt regarding the ability of such witness to perceive,
remember, communicate, distinguish truth from falsehood
or appreciate the duty to tell the truth, and/or to express
the same.
Explanation: The Court shall conduct a competency
examination before recording the testimony of such witness, or
on an application of either prosecution or defence or suo motu.
Persons allowed at competence assessment — Only the
following are allowed to attend the competence assessment:
ensure that questions are stated in a questions having use of past and
form appropriate to the present in one sentence;
developmental level of the
vulnerable witness;
*
The Court Shall The Court Shall Not Allow
avoid waste of time by declining
questions which the Court considers
unacceptable being improper, unfair,
misleading, needless, repetitive or
expressed in language that is too
complicated for the witness to
understand;
the court may allow the child witness
to testify in a narrative form;
*
* However, to consider the said application following 12
factors are to be considered:-
*
* To conceal description of the child witness, to examine :
* behind screen ;
* using image or voice altering devices;
* through examination in another place, transmitted simultaneously to the
Court room by means of video link;
* through a qualified and suitable intermediary.
*
*
* At any stage of the proceedings, where the safety of a child victim
or witness is deemed to be at risk, the Court shall arrange to
have protective measures for the child, which may include:
a) avoiding direct or indirect contact between a child victim or
witness and the accused at any point in the justice process;
b) restraint orders;
c) A pretrial detention order for the accused or with restraint or ―no
contact‖ bail conditions which may be continued during trial;
d) protection for a child victim or witness by the police or other
relevant agencies and safeguarding the whereabouts of the child
from disclosure;
e) any other protective measures that may be deemed appropriate.
*
*The definitions have been defined in paragraph no.2 of
the Scheme. Some of the important definitions are as
follows:-
*Competent Authority means a Standing Committee in
each District chaired by District and Sessions Judge with
Head of the Police in the District as Member and Head of
the Prosecution in the District as its Member Secretary.
*
(g) Live Link means and include a live video link or other such
arrangement whereby a witness, while not being physically
present in the courtroom for deposing in the matter or
interacting with the Competent Authority;
(i) "Offence" means those offences which are punishable with death
or life imprisonment or an imprisonment up to seven years and
above and also offences punishable under Sections 354, 354A,
354B, 354C, 354D and 509 of IPC.
Even new identity to the witness can be allotted by the Competent Authority,
which includes new name/profession/parentage and providing supporting
documents acceptable by the Government agencies. However, the new identity
should not deprive the witness from educational/professional/property rights.
Competent authority may pass an order for witness relocation to a safer place and
the expenses shall be borne from the Witness Protection Fund.
Confidentiality and preservation of records:
*All stakeholders including police, prosecution
department, court staff, lawyers of both sides are
under the obligation to maintain full confidentiality
and not to share any record, document or information
qua the same with any person except on a written
order of trial Court/Appellate Court.
*The record pertaining to the said proceedings shall be
preserved till pendency of trial or appeal. The hard
copy of the records can be weeded out by the
competent authority after one year of disposal of last
Court proceedings after preserving the scanned soft
copies of the same.
Recovery of expenses:
*In case of false complaint, the Home Department of
concerned Government can initiate the proceedings for
recovery of the expenditure from the Witness Protection
Fund.
Review:
*A review application may be filed within 30 days of
passing of the order by the aggrieved party i.e. either
by witness or police authority before the Competent
Authority.
* Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 Witness Protection Application under Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 Before, (To
be filed in duplicate) The Competent Authority, District................................................................
Application for:
1. Witness Protection
2. Witness Identity Protection
3. New Identity
4. Witness Relocation
5. Particulars of the Witness
(Fill in --------------------------- Capital): ---------------------------
1) Name --------------------
2) Age --------------------
3) Gender (Male/Female/Other) --------------------
4) Father's/Mothers Name ---------------------
5) Residential Address --------------------
6) Name and other details of family -------------------- members of the witness who are ------------
receiving or perceiving threats --------------------
7) Contact details (Mobile/e-mail)
2. Particulars of Criminal matter: --------------------
1) FIR No. --------------------
2) Under Section --------------------
3) Police Station --------------------
4) 4) District ---------------------------
5) D.D. No. (in case FIR not yet --------------------------- registered) ---------------------------
6) Cr.Case No. (in case of private complaint)
3. Particulars of the Accused (if --------------------------- available/known):
1) Name --------------------
2) Address --------------------
3) Phone No.
4) Email id
_____________________