Perfect and Imperfect Market
Perfect and Imperfect Market
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Sunk costs are those which have already been incurred and which are
unrecoverable.
In business, sunk costs are typically not included in consideration when
making future decisions, as they are seen as irrelevant to current and
future budgetary concerns.
Sunk costs are in contrast to relevant costs, which are future costs that
have yet to be incurred.
For example, XYZ Clothing is considering shutting down a production facility, any
of the sunk costs that have end dates should be included in the decision. To make
the decision to close the facility, XYZ Clothing considers the revenue that would
be lost if production ends as well as the costs that are also eliminated. If the
factory lease ends in six months, the lease cost is no longer a sunk cost and should
be included as an expense that can also be eliminated. If the total costs are more
than revenue, the facility should be closed.
Incremental Cost:
KEY TAKEAWAYS
10,000 units has a total cost of $300,000 or $30 per unit ($300,000 /
$10,000)
12,000 units has a total cost of $330,000 or $27.50 per unit ($330,000 /
$12,000)
As a result, the total incremental cost to produce the additional 2,000 units is
$30,000 or ($330,000 - $300,000).
The incremental cost per unit equals $15 ($30,000 / 2,000 units).
The reason there's a lower incremental cost per unit is due to certain costs, such
as fixed costs remaining constant. Although a portion of fixed costs can increase
as production increases, usually, the cost per unit declines since the company
isn't buying additional equipment or fixed costs to produce the added volume.
Market Based on Competition : Normally the market based on competition is
classified on the basis of number of sellers and buyers. Of which the market of
sellers is more important. The types are: perfect competition, monopolistic
competition, oligopoly. The two major classes of market based on competition
are: Perfect competition and imperfect competition.
Perfect Competition
Perfect Competition : Perfect competition market is an ideal market. It is only
possible theoretically, not practically except the agricultural sector. This market is
rarely observed, because the terms for establishing perfect competition are no
met that easily. In economics, the study of perfect competition is very important. As
this helps in understanding the characteristics and behaviour of other market based on
monopoly, monopolistic competition, oligopoly.
Perfect competition: An industry structure in which there are many firms, none
large enough to influence the industry, producing homogeneous products. Firms
are price takers. There are no barriers to entry. Agriculture comes close to being
perfectly competitive.
1) Monopoly
The economists consider the ‘Perfect Market’ and ‘Monopoly’ as two completely
opposite theories. Monopoly is an imaginary concept. The monopoly observed is
in reality imperfect monopoly.
Monopoly has originated from the Greek words, ‘Monos’ which means ‘Single’
and ‘Polein’ means ‘Seller’. So, Monopoly means the market having one seller.
Monopoly : Definition
1 According to Prof. Chamberlin: ‘‘When the product supply is controlled only by
an single enterprise, it is Monopoly.”
2 According to Prof. Stigler: “only one enterprise is the seller of the goods or
product.”
Characteristics:
have products that are highly differentiated, meaning that there is a perception
that the goods are different for reasons other than price;
have many firms providing the good or service;
firms can freely enter and exits in the long-run;
firms can make decisions independently;
there is some degree of market power, meaning producers have some control
over price; and
buyers and sellers have imperfect information.
3) Oligopoly Market:
Oligopoly markets are markets dominated by a small number of suppliers. They
can be found in all countries and across a broad range of sectors. Some
oligopoly markets are competitive, while others are significantly less so, or can at
least appear that way. Competition authorities are often called upon to
investigate concerns of co-ordinated actions or lack of vigorous competition.
However, detecting the root cause of sub-competitive performance in oligopolies
can be challenging, and the manner in which it occurs (e.g. whether through an
explicit agreement among the firms to restrain competition, or something less)
may greatly affect the analysis and available tools/remedies under competition
law. This can potentially lead to enforcement gaps whereby welfare-reducing
conduct is not addressed.