“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE BETWEEN

MODIFIED MDL (DIGITAL) AND MDL (PRINTED) GRADE 11 STUDENTS WITH

THE USE OF INTERNET”
Chapter IV

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

This study determined the academic performance difference of grade 11 students of

Toledo City Science High School between Modified Modular Distance Learning (Digital) and
Modular Distance Learning (Printed) with the use of internet. The researchers used descriptive
research method to analyze the data. Data gathering was performed through questionnaires via
google forms. The questionnaire was utilized in order to determine the difference of the
academic performance difference of grade 11 students of Toledo City Science High School
between Modified Modular Distance Learning (Digital) and Modular Distance Learning
(Printed) with the use of internet. The data collected was subjected to certain statistical treatment.
The data were coded, tallied and tabulated for better presentation and interpretation of the results.

Findings

Based on the data gathered, the following findings were presented: (1) There is no
significant difference between MDL (Digital) and MDL (Printed) learning modalities. (2) 98%
of the Grade 11 students owned mobile phones, while 63% owned Laptop/Notebook/Computer
and about 0.01% of the students used Tablet. (3) 33% of the students use Mobile Data as a means
of Internet Connection, 17% of Broadband as a means of Internet Connection, while there are
about 26% used Wireless as a mean and 24% used Cable Modem as a mean. (4) 9.09% of the
students live 0m – 20m away from the cell tower, 9.09% of the students live 20m – 40m away
from the cell tower, 16.67% of the students live 40m – 60m away from the cell tower, 9.09% of
the students live 60m – 80m away from the cell tower, 21.21% students live 80m – 1km away
from the cell tower, and 34.85 students live more than 1km away from the cell tower.

Conclusions

Based on the findings, the researchers concluded the following:

 1. Based from the students responds, most of them availed at least one type of gadget and
internet connectivity. The smartphone had the highest percentage from the gadget type,
while mobile data for the internet connection.
2. The average mean of the academic performance of students in MDL (Printed) is 93.70
and 93.27 in MDL (Digital).
3. Based on the study results, the mean GPA of digital and printed learning modalities did
not differ, + (44) = .687, p= .50. This projects null acceptance and alternative rejection.
This means that there is no significant difference between MDL (Digital) and MDL
(Printed) learning modalities.
4. With a total of 66 respondents from grade 11 students. 6 students live 0m – 20m away
from the cell tower. Another 6 students live 20m – 40m away from the cell tower. 11 of
the students live 40m – 60m away from the cell tower. And another 6 students live 60m –
80m away from the cell tower. 14 students live 80m – 1km away from the cell tower.
Lastly, 23 students live more than 1km away from the cell tower.

Recommendations

Specifically, based from analysis and results interpretations, the researchers recommend
the following:

1. Conducting a research on the negative factor that can risk the Academic Performance of
the Student under Modified MDL (Digital) and Modified MDL (Printed).
2. Since the Modified Modular Distance Learning (Digital) has a positive impact, the
researchers recommend continuing to use or further improve the learning modality.
3. Conduct a study covering the whole population of Toledo City Science High School.
4. Study the difference between the MDL (Digital) and MDL (Printed) in terms of their
challenges and advantages.
5. Study the mental health of the students under both MDL (Printed) and MDL (Digital).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Amirah, N. (n.d.). The Use of Gadgets Among KMS Students.

Anderson, T. (n.d.). TEACHING IN AN ONLINE LEARNING CONTEXT. 11-20.
Barrett, B. (2010). Virtual Teaching And Strategies: Transitioning From Teaching Traditional Classes To
Online Classes. 1-4.
Calabrese, F., Ferrari, L., & Blondel, V. D. (2014, January). Urban Sensing Using Mobile Phone Network
Data: A Survey of Research. Retrieved from ResearchGate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271727911_Urban_Sensing_Using_Mobile_Phone_Net
work_Data_A_Survey_of_Research
Gaire, A. K. (2019). Internet Use and Academic Performance of the Students. 1-7.
Johannesburg. (2012). Correlation Between Internet Usage and Academic Performance. 9-90.
Karpicke, J. D., & III, H. L. (n.d.). The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning. Retrieved 2008,
from https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/11400149_10206839127559832_37167288_n.pdf/
imp-of-retrieval-for-learning.pdf?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-
3&_nc_sid=0cab14&_nc_eui2=AeEO8nCbv9saZgqvnbX7N5jz2gjthBZKuf_aCO2EFkq5_ztjXlJ
nFo9q1o__IkmWSqIke0lIIKhM9FCsj8KX69bu&_nc_ohc=i8
Lin, M.-H., Chen, H.-C., & Liu, K. S. (2017, March 19). A Study of the Effects of Digital Learning on
Learning Motivation and Learning Outcome. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Kristine
%20Angelie-pc/Downloads/effects-of-modular-learning.pdf
Mansour, B. E., & Mupinga, D. M. (n.d.). STUDENTS' POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EXPERIENCES
IN HYBRID AND ONLINE CLASSES. 1-8.
Mockus, L., Dawson, H., Edel-Malizia, S., Shaffer, D., An, J. S., & Swaggerty, A. (2011). The Impact of
Mobile Access on Motivation: Distance Education Student Perceptions. 4-34.
Nair, A., Yadav, N., Thawait, D., Tapre, S., Kashyap, S., Rathod, A., & Dhande, N. (2020, December 21).
Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. Retrieved January 21, 2021,
from Journaldmims: https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-
21/202524191_341777437534474_1833680268650787603_n.pdf/gadget2.pdf?
_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-
3&_nc_sid=0cab14&_nc_eui2=AeEmJJ_5M7pZu37bckf50HeGwjy4fu7OSpLCPLh-
7s5KkrrkDDAZt3xzahjGrKcahODjw3TFZlfNn9jRlN2hsAKM&_nc_ohc=TmE1zIeEsnMAX9
Naserasadi, A. (2011, June). A Survey on Location based Services and Positioning Techniques. Retrieved
from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266333654_A_Survey_on_Location_based_Services_a
nd_Positioning_Techniques
Payne, S. C., Honer, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Schroeder, A. N., & Stine-Cheyne, K. J. (2009, November 6).
Comparison of online and traditional perfomance appraisal systems. Retrieved from
emerald.com: https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/0268-3946
Samuel, N. O. (2010). An Evaluation of Internet Usage among Senior Secondary School Students in
Public Schools in Lagos State. 3-34.
Summers, J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. (2005). A Comparison of Student Achievement and
Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class. Retrieved from
ResearchGate:
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226205151_A_Comparison_of_Student_Achievement_
and_Satisfaction_in_an_Online_Versus_a_Traditional_Face-to-Face_Statistics_Class
Technical University of Mombasa. (n.d.). Modeling the Impact of Internet Use on Academic
Performance. 2-15.
Wojciechowski, A., & Palmer, L. B. (2005, January). Individual Student Characteristics: Can Any Be
Predictors Of Success In Online Classes?

APPENDIX

A: Transmittal Letters

B: Research Instruments

RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE
Name (Surname, First Name, Middle Initial): ____________________
Grade and Section:
o Grade 11- Tesla
o Grade 11- Lovelace
Home Address: __________________________
SIM Network: _____________________
Grade Point Average (1st semester): ______
List of gadgets owned:
o Printed
o Digital
Estimated distance of house from the cell tower of your SIM network:
o 0-20 meters
o 20-40 meters
o 40-60 meters
o 60-80 meters
o 80m – 1 kilo meter
o 1 kilo meter+

Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2014

Harris Poll (2014)
 DEVICE USAGE
I currently use smartphone.
Follow up question: What is the size of the smartphone you currently owned?
o Standard size
o Large size / phablet

I currently use Laptop, notebook or

Chromebook computer.
I currently use tablet
Follow up question: What is the size of tablet you currently owned?
o Large (such as Apple iPad or Google Nexus 10)
o Medium (such as Samsung Galaxy Tab 5)
o Small (such as Apple iPad mini 2 or iPad air)
o none
I currently use hybrid 2 in 1
DAILY USAGE OF MOBILE DEVICES
I daily use Laptop
I daily use smartphone
I daily use Tablet
I daily use hybrid or “2 in 1” computer

School District Technology Survey Questions Related to Home Internet Connectivity

Kajeet (2016)
TECHNOLOGY RELATED TO STRONGLY AGREE DISAGREE STRONGLY
INTERNET CONNECTIVITY AGREE DISAGREE
Technology is critical to the learning
experience of students
My access to technology is currently
regular and adequate.
My access to technology at home is
 currently regular and adequate.
I have strong technology skills
I frequently use technology for
homework.
I have Internet access and I need it
for my homework.
Follow up question: What is your specific Internet access?
o Cable modem
o Dial up
o DSL
o Mobile
o Hotspot
o Wireless
o Broadband
When I don’t have internet access at
home, I have an alternate method for
accessing the internet
Follow up question: What are your alternate method for accessing the internet?
o Access at a local restaurant or business establishment
o At local library
o Internet Café
o Borrow an internet enabled device from a friend or a family member
o Access at a friend’s or family member’s home
I am able to access internet.
I have an internet at home or
anywhere I am staying for the entire
semester.
Follow up question: What is the speed of your internet?
o Slow internet (Dial up, GPRS/EDGE, 3G, or speed up to 256kbps)
o Medium speed internet (46/LTE or speed up to 2 Mbps)
o Fast internet (DSL, Fiber or min speed of 2Mbps)

My internet connection is metered

Follow up question: How is your internet metered?
o Metered per minute charges (Piso WIFI)
o Metered with Data plan with max Gb data transfers per month (Load promo)
o Home broadband with or without data capping (WIFI)

C: Raw Data
Table 2. Raw data

Email Name Grad Home SI 1st List of Lear Estimated

Address (Surnam e and Address M Semest Gadgets ning distance of
e, First Secti N er owned mod your house
Name, on et Grade ality from the
Middle w Point chos cell tower
Initial) or Averag en of your SIM
k e network
rioravel Norteza,
Gra 1785 S 94 phone Digit 1kilometer
n@gma Riode DASSRO, m laptop al +
il.com Ravel II
11- DAS Toledo art
C.Tesl City, Cebu,
a Philippines
blesev.b BONGO Gra DAANLUN S 96 PERSON Digit 40-60
ongon0 N, de GSOD, m AL al meters
2@gma BLESE 11- TOLEDO art COMPUT
il.com V V. Tesl CITY CEBU ER, &
a CELLPH
ONE
honeyly Mabuna Gra Magdugo, Gl 94 2 Digit 40-60
n.mabu y, de Toledo City. ob al meters
nay10 Honeyly 11- e
@gmail n H. Tesl
.com a
jonabie. Caparida Gra Sangi, Gl 93 Phone Digit 0-20 meters
caparid , Jonabie de Toledo City ob al
a018@ R. 11- e
gmail.c Tesl
om a
rechelle Marata, Gra Luray II, Gl 93 Cellphone Digit 40-60
.marata Rechelll de Toledo City ob and laptop al meters
30@gm e Andrea 11- e
ail.com B. Tesl
a
kiersten Bautista, Gra Sipaway, Gl 93 Phone, Digit 40-60
.bautist Kiersten de Toledo City ob Laptop, al meters
a21@g Laurean, 11- e Tablet
mail.co N. Tesl
m a
earlbino Binoya, Gra Baud, Media Gl 93 1 Digit 60-80
ya@gm Earl de Once Toledo ob al meters
ail.com Jasper P. 11- City e
Tesl
 a
kevin.s Sugabo, Gra Ilihan Toledo S 90 2 Digit 1kilometer
ugabo1 Kevin P. de City m al +
@gmail 11- art
.com Tesl
a
nicolea Abellan Gra Magsaysay Gl 94 Cellphone Digit 1kilometer
bellanos osa, de St. Toledo ob , IPad and al +
a03@g Nicole 11- City e Laptop
mail.co Marie C. Tesl
m a
adriann CAÑAB Gra DAS, Toledo Gl 94 2 Digit 40-60
e.canab ANO, de city ob al meters
ano28 Adriann 11- e
@gmail e Jose T. Tesl
.com a
johnro Macapo Gra Sangi Toledo S 88 Phone Digit 60-80
man.ma bre, de City m al meters
capobre John 11- art
@gmail Roman, Tesl
.com V a
gurwins Singh, Gra Sangi Foster, S 90 2 Digit 20-40
ingh0@ Gurwind de Toledo City m al meters
gmail.c er, P. 11- art
om Tesl
a
jed.don Donaire, Gra DAS, Toledo T 95 2 Print 80 m - 1
aire08 Jed de City N ed kilometer
@gmail Edison 11- T
.com J. Tesl
a
ayeasah Branzuel Gra Luray 1, T 95 4 Print 40-60
.branzu a, de Poblacio, N ed meters
ela1@g Ayeasah 11- Toledo City T
mail.co G. Tesl
m a
fritchiel Layan, Gra Poblacion, Gl 94 phones Print 40-60
ayan.9 Fritchie de Toledo City ob ed meters
@gmail A. 11- e
.com Tesl
a
salvado Salvador Gra Sambag Gl 91 2 Print 60-80
rjohnec , John de Sangi, ob ed meters
ho@gm Angelic 11- Toledo City e
ail.com o, E. Tesl
a
marwei Barioga, Gra Ilihan Toledo Gl 93 Computer Print 0-20 meters
nbariog Marwein de City ob , ed
a6@gm L. 11- e Cellphone
ail.com Tesl
a
johnpau Vinluan, Gra Township, S 95 Just one Print 1kilometer
l.vinlua John de Poog, Toledo m cellphone ed +
n2004 Paul J. 11- City art (vivo)
@gmail Tesl
.com a
jherama Cahokso Gra Magdugo, S 96 Laptop, Print 80 m - 1
ecahoks n, Jhera de Toledo City m cellphone ed kilometer
on@gm Mae, Q. 11- art
ail.com Tesl
a
lowejay Camom Gra Ilihan Toledo S 93 Laptop, Print 1kilometer
.camom ot, Lowe de City m smartphon ed +
ot@gm Jay T. 11- art e
ail.com Tesl
a
divora.s Sayud, Gra Magdugo, Gl 95 laptop, Print 1kilometer
ayud28 Divora de Toledo City ob cellphone ed +
@gmail Vince L. 11- e
.com Tesl
a
pardzch Pardillo, Gra Ilihan, T 91 Smartpho Print 1kilometer
ristian Christia de Toledo City M ne,PC, ed +
@gmail n,B. 11-
.com Tesl
a
briannal Logue, Gra Sangi, T 95 2 Print 60-80
ogue67 Brianna de Toledo City M ed meters
@gmail P. 11-
.com Tesl
a
mjmoen Alcos, Gra Bulongan, Gl 94 2 Print 80 m - 1
.alcos@ Mj de Toledo City ob ed kilometer
gmail.c Moen, 11- e
om B. Tesl
a
donabel Enriquez Gra Abucayan, Gl 94 Smartpho Print 1kilometer
ledove1 , de Balamban ob ne ed +
7.enriqu Donabel 11- e
ez@gm le Dove Tesl
ail.com D. a
maeann Abellon, Gra Power Plant Gl 95 Smart Print 0-20 meters
abellon Mae de Site ob phone, PC ed
2002@ Ann, D. 11- Poblacion e
gmail.c Tesl Toledo City
om a
marykri Vega,M Gra Daanlungsod, Gl 96 Samsung Print 40-60
zelle.ve ary de Toledo City ob (mobile ed meters
ga31@ Krizelle, 11- e phone)
gmail.c V. Tesl
om a
rzabella Abella, Gra Tubod Gl 95 2 Digit 80 m - 1
1125@ Raymun de ob al kilometer
gmail.c d Zyron 11- e
om A. Lov
elac
e
ytuquib Tuquib, Gra Purok Gl 95 Smartpho Digit 80 m - 1
0328@ Yesha de Orchid, ob ne and al kilometer
gmail.c Dionne, 11- Sition Latid, e Laptop
om B. Lov Poblacion,
elac Pinamungaha
e n, Cebu
jquinal0 Quinal, Gra Mangoto, T 90 Smartpho Digit 80 m - 1
731@g Jullianne de Pinamungaja M ne and al kilometer
mail.co , A. 11- n, Cebu laptop
m Lov
elac
e
ppoloya Poloyap Gra Awihao, Gl 95 Cellphone Digit 80 m - 1
poy030 oy, de Toledo City ob and laptop al kilometer
4@gma Paulyn 11- e
il.com T. Lov
elac
e
jsocatre Socatre, Gra Subayon Gl 96 Cellphone Digit 1kilometer
0907@ Junamae de Toledo City ob al +
gmail.c Lyne P. 11- e
om Lov
elac
e
eunisem Alo, Gra Bliss, Gl 95 Laptop, Digit 0-20 meters
arie.a@ Eunise de Bonbon, ob tablet and al
gmail.c Marie A. 11- Aloguinsan e phone
om Lov Cebu
elac
e
jremegi Remegia Gra Cambang-Ug Gl 90 Smartpho Digit 1kilometer
a0911 , de Toledo City, ob ne and al +
@gmail Jonrhey 11- Cebu e Personal
.com m P. Lov Computer
elac
e
chanalf ALFAR, Gra Pandacan, Gl 96 2 Digit 0-20 meters
ar88@g CHRIST de Pinamungaja ob al
mail.co IAN 11- n, Cebu e
m JAMES Lov
R. elac
e
wittybo Abellana Gra Poblacion, Gl 94 phone, Digit 1kilometer
d.17@g , Rena de Toledo City ob desktop al +
mail.co Mae, M. 11- e
m Lov
elac
e
tsagolili Sagolili, Gra Tubod, Gl 95 2 Digit 80 m - 1
1019@ Trisha, de Toledo City ob al kilometer
gmail.c B. 11- e
om Lov
elac
e
kcanoni Camoni Gra Landahan, S 90 Smartpho Digit 60-80
go1008 go, de Toledo City m ne al meters
@gmail Keziah 11- art
.com Francine Lov
, B. elac
e
marani0 Marani Gra Subayon Gl 96 Laptop Digit 1kilometer
414@g Marjorie de Toledo City ob ang al +
mail.co C. 11- e cellphone
m Lov
elac
e
kcheng Cheng, Gra Canlumampa Gl 94 Cellphone Digit 20-40
0710@ Kate de o toledo city ob al meters
gmail.c Francis, 11- e
om P Lov
elac
e
j.gabisa Gabisan, Gra Mag. Hills, Gl 92 Phone, Digit 1kilometer
n0720 Jorshua, de Poblacion, ob Laptop al +
@gmail E 11- Toledo City e
.con Lov
elac
 e
lkdacay Dacayan Gra Dumlog Gl 96 ios Print 40-60
ana112 a, Lexi de Toledo City ob (iphone6), ed meters
6@gma Kyle, E. 11- e andriod
il.com Lov (samsung
elac A20),
e Laptop
rujhunel Morales, Gra Sipaway Gl 92 Cellphone Print 80 m - 1
123@g Rujhune de ob ed kilometer
mail.co lM 11- e
m Lov
elac
e
pcabilla Cabillar Gra Ibo toledo Gl 92 Smartpho Print 1kilometer
r0307@ Psalm E de city ob ne oppo ed +
gmail.c 11- e
om Lov
elac
e
caestrer Eatrera, Gra Canlumampa Gl 90 2 Print 1kilometer
a14@g Carl de o, Toledo ob ed +
mail.co Anthony 11- City e
m P. Lov
elac
e
Count of I currently use Laptop, notebook or Chromebook Count of I currently use tablet
computer.
Strongly Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Strongly agree

Strongly agree

Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Agree 0 5 10 15 20 25

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Figure 6. Tablet Usage

Figure 5. Device usage
 Count of I currently use smartphone.

Strongly Disagree Count of I daily use tablet

Strongly Disagree

Strongly agree

Strongly agree

Agree Disagree

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Agree

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Figure 7. Smartphone Usage

Figure 11. Daily usage of Tablet
Count of I currently use hybrid 2 in 1

Count of I daily use hybrid or "2 in 1" computer

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Disagree

Agree

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Agree

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Figure 8. Hybrid 2 in 1 usage
Figure 12. Daily usage of 2 in 1 computer
Count of I daily use Laptop

Strongly Disagree
Count of Technology is critical to the learning experience of
students
Strongly agree
30

Disagree 25

20
Agree

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 15

10

Figure 9. Daily usage of laptop

5

Count of I daily use smartphone 0

Agree Disagree Strongly agree
35

30

25
Figure 13. Technology is Critical to the
20

15
learning of Students
10

0
Agree Strongly agree

Figure 10. Daily usage of smartphone

 Count of I have Internet access and I need it for my
Count of My access to technology at home is currently regular homework.
and adequate. 30

25

Strongly Disagree
20

15

Strongly agree 10

Disagree 0
Agree Disagree Strongly agree

Agree Figure 17. Having internet access for

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
homework

Figure 14. Access to technology at home is Count of Follow up question: What is your specific Internet
access?
regular
16

14
Count of I have strong technology skills
30 12

25
10
20
8
15
6
10
4
5

2
0
Agree Disagree
0
Broadband Cable modem Mobile Wireless

Figure 15. Strong technology skills

Figure 18. Internet access
Count of I frequently use technology for homework.

Count of Follow up question: What is the size of tablet you

Strongly Disagree currently owned?

Strongly agree Small (such as Apple iPad mini 2 or iPad air)

Disagree none

Agree Medium (such as Samsung Galaxy Tab 5)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Large (such as Apple iPad or Google Nexus 10)

Figure 16. Frequent use of technology for 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

homework
Figure 19. Size of tablet currently owned
 Count of When I don’t have internet access at home, I have an Count of I have an internet at home or anywhere I am staying
alternate method for accessing the internet for the entire semester.

Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree

Disagree Disagree

Agree Agree

0 5 10 15 20 25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Figure 20. Having alternate method to Figure 23. Having Internet at home
access internet
Count of Follow up question: What is the speed of your in-
ternet?
Count of Follow up question: What are your alternate method
for accessing the internet?

Slow internet (Dial up, GPRS/EDGE, 3G, or speed up to 256kbps)

Borrow an internet enabled device from a friend or a family member

Medium speed internet (46/LTE or speed up to 2 Mbps)

Access at a friend's or family member's home

Fast internet (DSL, Fiber or min speed of 2Mbps)

19.5 20 20.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24 24.5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Figur
Figure 21. Alternate method to access
e 24. Speed of internet
internet
Count of My internet connection is metered
Count of I am able to access internet.
30

Strongly Disagree
25

20

Strongly agree
15

10

Disagree
5

0
Agree Disagree Strongly agree

Agree

Figure 22. Internet Access 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Figure 25. Metered Internet Connection

 Count of Follow up question: How is your internet metered?

Metered with Data plan with max Gb data transfers per month(Load
promo)

Home broadband with or without data capping (wifi)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Figure 26. How your Internet is metered.

D: Other important attachments

Table 3. Independent Samples Test

Leven’s Test for Equality of t-test for Equality of Means

Variances
F Sig. t df
GPA .68
Equal Variances 4 .413 .687 44
assumed

Equal variances not .708 43.897

assumes

Table 4. Independent Samples Test

t-test for Equality of Means

Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Std. Error 95%
Difference Difference Confidence

Lower
GPA
Equal Variances .495 .431 .627 -.832
assumed

Equal variances not .483 .431 .609 -.796

assumes

Table 5. Independent Samples Test

t-test for Equality of…

95%
 Confidence
Upper
GPA Equal variances assumed 1.694

Equal variances not assumed 1.658

Table 6. Group Satistics

Groups N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

GPA Printed 20 93.70 1.838 .411
Digital 26 93.27 2.290 .449

E: Curriculum Vitae

Mike Lawrence Alpas was born on February 23, 2002 at

Pinamungajan, Cebu. He is currently studying Senior High School
in Toledo City Science High School, Ilihan Heights, Toledo City.
He is under STEM under academic Track. He graduated Junior
High with Honors.

Maria Isabel Labayen was born on October 30, 2002 at

Pinamungajan, Cebu. She is currently studying Senior High School
in Toledo City Science High School, Ilihan Heights, Toledo City.
She is under STEM under academic Track. She graduated Junior
High with Honors.

Shayne Avril Cimafranca was born on April 30, 2003 at

Pinamungajan, Cebu. She is currently studying Senior High
School in Toledo City Science High School, Ilihan Heights,
Toledo City. She is under STEM under academic Track. She
graduated Junior High with Honors.
Irish Camille Natural was born on September 18, 2003 at Sangi,
Toledo City. She is currently studying Senior High School in
Toledo City Science High School, Ilihan Heights, Toledo City.
She is under STEM under academic Track. She graduated Junior
High with Honors.

Maria Therese Uraca was born on May 21,2003 at

Pinamungajan, Cebu. She is currently studying Senior High
School in Toledo City Science High School, Ilihan Heights,
Toledo City. She is under STEM under academic Track. She
graduated Junior High with Honors.