Design and Development of Battery Integrated PV System Using MPPT
Design and Development of Battery Integrated PV System Using MPPT
Abstract— Maintaining a constant voltage and power level a boost converter, and the incremental conductance [2] MPPT
with changing irradiation is a significant challenge for a PV technique to work. The battery storage system helps to keep
system. In this paper, we have tried to solve this problem with the DC bus voltage near the reference level by pushing power
MPPT and an integrated energy storage system. Incremental to the bus when solar irradiation is low. A simple solar electric
conductance is a MPPT algorithm that governs the boost and battery setup is shown in "Fig. 1." .
converter on the solar array side and extracts the most power
possible from fluctuating solar irradiation. To maintain
constant power and voltage in the DC bus, a separate control
system switches the energy storage system's mood between
charging and discharging. This paper discusses both the
charging and discharging methods of the bidirectional
converter. To achieve faster MPP, this paper discusses the
method in three sections in the result analysis section.
VL =Vbus -Vb (1) To begin growing linearly with slope, the current in
inductor (L) must increase.
IL =(Vbus -Vb)/L (2)
IL = −Vb/L (6)
b) Case 2:
∗ ∗ (9)
As illustrated in “Fig. 3” (b), the power switches (S1) and
(S2) are off in this state, and the diode (D2) begins to conduct.
There is a voltage across the inductor (L).
∗ (10)
∗
VL = Vbus − Vb (7)
Equations for determining the inductance and capacitance
The current in inductor (L) must begin to decrease of the bidirectional DC-DC converter.
linearly with slope.
∗
IL = (Vbus − Vb)/ L (8) (11)
∗ ∗
∗ (12)
∗
(a)
V. RESULT ANALYSIS
A. Modes of the operation
The battery module helps to achieve the MPP faster. This
Fig. 5. Bidirectional control circuit of DC-DC converter. paper has separated the analysis into three cases.
IV. DESIGN AND ALGORITHM OF PV ARRAY AND MPPT a) Case 1( 0 to 1 sec):
In this study, the PV panel's power output is monitored In this case, as we can see from "Fig. 8", the solar
using the incremental conductance MPPT method[11] and a irradiation is 1000 watts/m2. The DC bus voltage is a little
boost converter from DC-DC [12]. PV panel voltage and higher than the reference voltage (220 v). The PV output
current are monitored, and the MPPT receives the signals and power is near the MPP (KW), and the SOC% of the battery is
computes the duty ratio based on variations in voltage. "Fig. gradually increasing, meaning the battery is in charging
6" represents the flow chart of the incremental conductance mode.
method. b) Case 2( 1 to 2 sec):
Equations for determining the inductance and capacitance In this case, as we can see from "Fig. 8", the solar
of the boost converter. irradiation comes down to 600 watts/m2. First, the DC bus
voltage falls way below the reference voltage. But gradually
catches up to the reference voltage. The PV output power is
following near its new MPP (9 KW), and the SOC% of the
battery shows almost a flat line, meaning the battery is going
towards discharging mode. That means the battery is pushing
power to the DC bus to keep the voltage level near the
reference voltage.
c) Case 3( 2 to 3 sec): Fig. 10. Output diagram of time vs irradiation.
In this case, as we can see from “Fig. 8”, the solar irradiation
rises to 800 watts/m2. At first there is a sudden rise in DC bus VI. CONCLUSION
voltage, but gradually it comes down to the reference voltage. This paper has discussed a possible solution to fluctuating
The PV output power is followed near its new MPP (12 KW), voltage and power with MPPT (incremental conductance)
and the SOC% of the battery shows an increase in charge, and energy storage. The demerit of this system is that when
meaning the battery is in charging mode. This means the the solar irradiance is above 900 watts/m2 and below 600
battery is pulling power from the DC bus to keep the voltage watts/m2 the DC Bus voltage is unable to follow the reference
level near reference voltage. voltage. In the future, we will address this problem. Another
one is that, in this paper, we have only used pure resistive
load; in the future, we will be using inductive and capacitive
load to further analyze the performance of the system. Also,
we will see the performance of the system when connected to
the grid.
REFERENCES
[1] V. V. and V. S. R. R., “Microcontroller based bidirectional buck–boost
converter for photo-voltaic power plant,” J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol.
5, no. 3, pp. 745–758, Dec. 2018.
[2] H. M. Abd Alhussain and N. Yasin, “Modeling and simulation of solar
PV module for comparison of two MPPT algorithms (P&O & Inc) in
(a) MATLAB/simulink,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 18, no. 2,
pp. 666–677, 2020.
[3] U. B. Mujumdar and D. R. Tutkane, “Development of integrated
hardware set up for solar photovoltaic system monitoring,” in 2013 Annual
IEEE India Conference (INDICON), Dec. 2013, pp. 1–6.
[4] S. Y. Mousazadeh, M. Savaghebi, A. Beirami, A. Jalilian, J. M. Guerrero,
and C. Li, “Control of a multi-functional inverter for grid integration of PV
and battery energy storage system,” in 2015 IEEE 10th International
Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and
Drives (SDEMPED), Sep. 2015, pp. 474–480.
[5] N. Mhiri, K. Ammous, I. TISS, H. Mejbri, A. Alahdal, and A. Ammous,
“Design of a Novel Analog MPPT Integrated Chip Used in PV Systems
Applications,” in 2020 11th International Renewable Energy Congress
(IREC), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–6.
(b) [6] A. Kokare, S. Patil, and L. Bacchav, “Implementation of a highly efficient
MPPT technique for a PV system using sepic converter,” in 2017
Fig. 8. Simulation diagram of a) Time vs DC bus voltage and time vs International Conference on Information, Communication, Instrumentation
SOC% b) Time vs Irradiation and Time vs Output power. and Control (ICICIC), Aug. 2017, pp. 1–5.
[7] S. Singh, S. Manna, M. I. Hasan Mansoori, and A. K. Akella,
“Fig. 9” shows the impact of time-varying irradiation on “Implementation of Perturb & Observe MPPT Technique using Boost
current, voltage, and power because it is known that MPPT converter in PV System,” in 2020 International Conference on
Computational Intelligence for Smart Power System and Sustainable Energy
tracks for varied irradiances. “Fig.10” shows the time vs (CISPSSE), Keonjhar, India, Jul. 2020, pp. 1–4.
irradiation graph. The PV panel specifications that were taken [8] I. A. Pragash, J. Booma, and A. J. Dhana Rega, “An integrated control
into consideration for this study were: an open circuit voltage for standalone PV system with battery management,” in 2016 International
of 254.1V, short circuit current of 80A, and a power output Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT),
of 14920 W. Mar. 2016, pp. 1–7.
[9] S. S. Yadav and K. S. Sandhu, “A Grid Connected Hybrid PV/Fuel
Cell/Battery Using Five Level PWM Inverter,” in 2018 International
Conference on Emerging Trends and Innovations In Engineering And
Technological Research (ICETIETR), Ernakulam, Jul. 2018, pp. 1–5.
[10] N. Balakrishnan, A. T.S, and L. R. Chandran, “PV-battery system for
smart green building using transformer coupled DC-DC converter,” in 2016
IEEE 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control
and Energy Systems (ICPEICES), Jul. 2016, pp. 1–6.
[11] “(2) (PDF) Modeling and Simulation of Incremental Conductance
MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Applications.”
[12] M. A. Omar and M. M. Mahmoud, “Design and Simulation of DC/DC
Boost Converter with Maximum Power Point Tracking for Grid Connected
PV Inverter Considering the Nonlinearity of the PV Generator,” Int. J.
Fig. 9. Output diagram of voltage vs current and voltage vs power. Energy Convers. IRECON, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 241–252, Nov. 2019.