Metasurfaces for Smart Radio Environments
Metasurfaces for Smart Radio Environments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
III. M E T A S U R F A C E M O D E L S A N D
CANONICAL PROBLEMS
The effective design of RIS devices requires the use of
realistic models that are, at the same time, accurate
enough to describe practical characteristics (losses, fre- Fig. 4. Geometry for the periodic MTS and corresponding
quency dependency, MTS discretization, coupling among equivalent transmission line model in homogenization assumption.
elements, and so on), sufficiently general to be applicable (a) Opaque impedance model. (b) Penetrable impedance model.
e/h
where Zsc is the TM/TE reactance of the grounded slab.
We note that Zs possesses the same property of Z in the
absence of losses.
The penetrable impedance model can be generalized to
a generic multilayer environment and applied also to MTSs
operating in transmission. In the presence of multiple
printed layers, interlayer interactions can be accounted for
Fig. 5. Local canonical macroperiodic homogenized problems for
by means of a multiport network based on the concept of
(a) space-wave illumination or (b) surface-wave illumination. “accessible modes” [30]. This model neglects ports associ-
ated with MTS-layer Floquet’s modes that are sufficiently
symmetry plane of the MTS, there is no coupling, and attenuated at contiguous layers.
scalar equivalent impedances equal to the eigenvalues of Furthermore, it is noted that the penetrable impedance,
the tensors can be used for each polarization. which only represents the contribution of the patterned
For static MTSs operating in the microwave and metallic layer, is only weakly dependent on the transverse
millimeter-wave ranges, losses can normally be neglected, wavenumber of the interacting field, as opposed to the
and the equivalent impedance tensor Z is anti-Hermitian impenetrable impedance, which models the whole finite
(namely, with purely reactive eigenvalues). For reconfig- thickness MTS. For this reason, the first model offers a
urable MTSs, however, losses are in general higher, and significantly higher accuracy whenever the same BC has
the tensor matrix loses the anti-Hermitian properties. to be used for different wavenumbers [31], [32].
In the common case in which the MTS is realized by
printing metallic patches on a grounded slab, a more B. Infinite Canonical Problem: Periodic
accurate model can be defined relying on an equivalent Homogenized MTSs
transmission line description. According to this model,
a penetrable impedance BC is introduced, which relates Despite the apparent difference among them, various
the tangential electric field to the discontinuity of the applications of spatially modulated MTSs share the same
average tangential magnetic field across the metallization objective: tailoring the space spectrum of the excitation
as follows: field, being it either a space wave or a surface wave. More
specifically, two fundamental applications for SRE aim at
generating fields with a wavenumber different from the
Et (z = 0) = Zs ẑ × Ht z = 0+ − Ht z = 0− . (2)
one of the exciting wave. The first one is the case of
anomalous reflection (case (a) in Fig. 2), where, given an
The relationship between Z and Zs expressed in the TM/TE incident space wave, we desire to generate a nonspecular
reference system of the interacting wave can be derived reflected field while canceling the specular reflection. The
second application is relevant to antennas and sensors
based on SWs, where either the incident (cases (e) and (f)
in Fig. 2) or the generated surface wave (see Fig. 3)
propagates with phase velocity less than the speed of light.
In both these cases, the objective is reached by introducing
a (local) macroperiodicity in the homogenized MTS so
that different space harmonics, or curvilinear-wavefront
Floquet waves (FWs), can be generated. It is, therefore,
important to formulate in a parametric way the analysis of
the interaction of an EM plane wave with a periodically
modulated unidirectional-gradient homogenized surface
impedance, which matches the local BCs even in cases
where the modulation is curvilinear (see Fig. 5).
Fig. 6. Geometry for (a) nonhomogenized and (b) homogenized
This unidirectional-gradient, macroperiodic impedance
canonical problems of a periodically modulated MTS with
macroperiod d. In the inset on the right: printed elements and
problem represents, therefore, the “canonical” problem for
microperiod d0 (red arrow denotes SW, and blue arrow denotes the the MTS design. (Note that we use here the term “canon-
homogeneous incident plane wave). ical” even if the solution of the problem is not analytical
due to its numerically simple formulation and solution.) is a constant representing the complex amplitude of the
We stress again that we will refer to the periodicity of incident field. Both sides of (7) are periodic functions of
the impedance profile as a macroperiodicity d, as opposed the spatial coordinate y ; therefore, they can be expanded
to the microperiodicity d0 related to the subwavelength in the Fourier series. After equating the corresponding
unit cell used for the MTS implementation (see Fig. 6). coefficients of the series, for any n-index, we get
An approach for a rigorous solution of the problem, which
can be seen as a generalization of the approach proposed inc
Im Zn−m = GEJ (kyn ) In + Ey0 δn,0 (8)
in [33], is described in the following. m
Consider the geometry depicted in Fig. 6, where a
periodically modulated MTS is excited by an EM plane where m Im Zn−m = [{Z̃} ⊗ {I}] ˜ n is the nth term of the
wave field characterized by a transverse wavenumber ky0 . convolution between the impedance and current expan-
For the sake of simplicity, we will consider here a scalar sion coefficients, and δi,j is the Kronecker delta. For all n,
impedance and a TM-polarized incident field, propagating (8) can be written in the form of an infinite linear system
along a direction orthogonal to the periodicity variation; in the unknowns Im
however, the procedure illustrated here can be readily
generalized to the case of tensor impedance, arbitrary
inc
polarization, and skew incidence [34]. ζn,m Im = Ey0 δn,0 (9)
m
This problem can be rigorously solved through a mode-
matching method using FWs as modal functions. To this
with
end, the Fourier series of the impedance profile and the
FW expansion of the currents induced in the equivalent
impedance surface are introduced ζn,m = Zn−m − GEJ (kyn ) δn,m . (10)
2πm y
Z (y) = Zm e−j d (4) In numerical evaluation, the Fourier expansions can be
m truncated to a finite number of terms (generally conver-
I (y) ŷ = ẑ × Ht = In e−jkyn y ŷ (5) gence is reached with few tens of terms). This leads to a
n finite linear system, whose solution provides the current
coefficients Im and, hence, the scattered fields.
where kyn are the FW wavenumbers given by Before proceeding further, we observe that the approach
described here is very different from a localized physical
2π optics (PO)-like approach, as the one used for reflectarray
kyn = ky0 + n (6)
d analysis [17] or in the so-called generalized reflection law
[35]. The latter assumes that the field reflected at any
and d is the macroperiodicity. Notice that the currents point can be approximated with the one reflected by the
in (5) may represent either the currents flowing in the infinite uniform surface, which locally approximates the
metallic cladding or currents ideally flowing in an equiva- modulated MTS [36], and therefore, it fails to correctly
lent impenetrable impedance depending on the impedance account for the macromodulation and the MTS spatial
model adopted. dispersion. The approach indicated here, instead, accounts
The following step consists of the imposition of the BCs; for these effects, and therefore, it provides much more
the specific equations are slightly different depending on accurate results [37]. This aspect is quantitatively inves-
the type of problem, as illustrated in the following. tigated in Section V.
ζn,m Im = 0 (12)
m
1 2 2
(16)
k̂inc = kx0 x̂ + ky0 ŷ + ẑ k2 − kx0 − ky0 (13)
k
where n̂ is the normal to the RIS surface,
where k is the free space wavenumber, in which the electric
currents are given by a superposition of plane waves com-
ing from the solution of the problem in (9), with current Knm = (knm − kr̂) (17)
amplitudes Inm,x and Inm,y along directions x and y , for
the FW contributions with transverse-to-z wavenumbers and GE,J (k) is the pertinent spectral dyadic Green’s
function.
knm = kxn x̂+kym ŷ Equation (15) represents the summation of field
contributions radiated by the FW-induced current sheets
2π 2π
= kx0 + n x̂ + ky0 + m ŷ. (14) associated with the canonical infinite problem, windowed
dx dy
on the RIS aperture. It is represented by diffraction contri-
butions from the vertexes of the polygonal rim. Each vertex
The FW-current coefficients Inm,x , Inm,y are proportional (i)
diffraction coefficient is a summation of contributions Dnm
to the electric field Einc of the incident plane wave and,
associated with the nm-indexed FW-induced current. These
therefore, can be rewritten as Inm = (Inm,x x̂ + Inm,y ŷ) =
coefficients exhibit singularities in direction r̂ located on
Ymn · Einc .
the surface of cones with axes on the two edges conflu-
1) Far-Field: Following the procedure in [38] and [39], ent to the corners and semiaperture equal to the angles
one can find a form of the far-field pattern in the direction between the two edges and the vectors Knm = (knm − kr̂).
r̂ = ux̂+v ŷ that eventually only depends on the position of We observe that the singularities do not exist for all the
the vertexes. To this end, let us assume that the ith vertex indexes nm, but only for those nm-indexed FWs whose
of the polygonal RIS is in position r(i) v at the confluence phase velocity along the edge is faster than the speed of
of two edges aligned along e(i−1) , e(i) , respectively, both light (normally only few of them). The singularities of
of them with amplitude equal to the side of the polygon the vertex diffraction coefficients of each couple of con-
(see Fig. 7). The index i = 1, . . . , N denotes both edges tiguous vertexes compensate for each other, thus giving a
and vertexes, with r(i)
v = e
(i+1)
− e(i) and e(N+1) = e(1) by well-behaved field everywhere. The numerical impairment
(i)
where Dv.nm and D(i) are vertex and edge diffraction B. Analysis of SW-Based MTS Sensors and
e,nm
coefficients, respectively, associated with each FW, and Antennas
(i) (i)
Fv,nm and Tv,nm are transition functions based on Fres- In the case of SW-based MTS antennas and sensors,
nel functions [41], [42] and generalized Fresnel func- the equivalent impedance is generally modulated along
tions [44]–[49]. Equation (18) casts the scattering from the radial direction. It is convenient to vary the mod-
the RIS in a ray-type format, which is well suited to be ulation parameters across the aperture to improve the
introduced in a conventional ray-tracer for the network performance. This implies that the overall structure is
planning of a smart environment. We note that, although not rigorously periodic but only “locally periodic” [see
the summation in (18) can be extended to all the FW asso- Fig. 5(a)]. Accordingly, the analysis of these structures
ciated with the infinite problem, only the ones in the visible can be performed by using an adiabatic extension of the
region can be included in the approximation since the rigorous FW expansion introduced in Section III-B, which
others are attenuated exponentially in the direction normal is referred to the 1-D problem which locally matches the
to the surface and also produce negligible diffraction effect 2-D structure. This approach, named the flat optics (FO)
at the edges. method, is described in [51], where its accuracy in the
The last term in (18) represents the direct FW ray fields representation of the local currents flowing in the MTS is
emanating from the “nonspecular” reflection points rnm demonstrated.
inside the surface. In a “perfect” design of the RIS, only We assume that there are no losses in the grounded
the FW associated with the anomalous reflection has to be dielectric characterized by constant relative permittivity
considered since all the Inm coefficients are zero except the εr and thickness h, the elements are also lossless, and
one associated with the nonspecular desired direction. the available circular aperture has radius a. The MTS top
This contribution exists only when the observation point film constituted by the subwavelength metallic elements
is inside a certain region of space delimited by the exis- is modeled as a penetrable BC in the transverse transmis-
tence function Unm , which is the projection of the RIS sion line model [see Fig. 4(b)] and is represented by a
polygon in the direction of propagation of the nmth FW. modulated equivalent capacitive reactance that is locally
The FW-induced edge diffracted rays emanate from edge periodic, as shown in Fig. 5(b).
diffraction points r(i)e,nm whose position can be found It is convenient to adopt a cylindrical coordinate refer-
through the generalized Fermat principle. Their existence ence system (ρ, φ) with unit vectors (ρ̂, ϕ̂) [see Fig. 5(b)],
(i)
field is regulated by the unit-step function Ue,nm that whose origin is centered at the feeder position, usually
intervenes forcing to zero the diffracted ray when the edge in the geometrical center of the aperture. The metallic
B. Tilted Beam
Fig. 15 presents a comparison between the simulated
and measured gain patterns at 20 GHz of a modulated
MTS antenna designed to radiate an RHCP beam that is
tilted 30◦ off from boresight. The antenna has a radius
of 10 λ at the working frequency. An excellent agreement
between the measured gain patterns and the calculated
ones is obtained, corroborating the effectiveness of the
design procedure. The achieved peak gain is equal to
33 dBi and corresponds to an aperture efficiency of 0.58.
The polarization purity is extremely good. Fig. 15 also
Fig. 13. Far-field scattered in the Fresnel region by an array of
shows the overall antenna layout and some details of the
dipoles in the near zone calculated by summation of individual
scatterers (dotted line) and by FW and FW-induced diffracted rays
feeder, which was composed essentially of a coaxial guide
(continuous line) with uniform transition functions. The calculations coupled to some patches of annular shape for matching
have been performed by A. Cucini (WaveCom). purposes.
are just taken proportional to the incident electric field C. Very High Gain
(no coupling is assumed between the dipoles, namely, An example of a very-high-gain MTS antenna prototype
the matrix Ynm in (18) is assumed to be the identity). obtained by an appropriate shape of the modulation is
Fig. 13 compares the results obtained by simply summing
the dipole contributions and using a ray-field description,
showing excellent accuracy.
VII. P R A C T I C A L E X A M P L E S O F
S W- B A S E D M T S
In this section, we present examples of high-performance
MTS antennas that have been designed with the method
seen before, realized and measured.
A. High Efficiency
An MTS antenna with maximum aperture efficiency
can be designed by implementing the modulation profile
introduced in [60]. A Ka-band prototype antenna has been
designed and fabricated to verify this approach.
The antenna features a diameter of 27λ at the center
frequency of 29.75 GHz. It was designed to radiate a
boresight beam with a product between the tapering and
spill-over efficiencies of 85%. The prototype was realized
by using a Rogers RO3003 laminate characterized by a
thickness of 0.762 mm and a relative dielectric constant
equal to 3.0 with a loss factor equal to tan δ = 0.001. The
measured peak gain was equal to 37 dBi corresponding to
an overall efficiency εtot ≈ 0.70, including the launching
efficiency of SW by the dipole and the losses. This antenna
currently constitutes a benchmark in terms of the maxi-
mum efficiency attained by MTS apertures. The simulated Fig. 14. Layouts and performance of a highly efficient MTS
antenna. (a) Copolar and (b) Cross-polar gain patterns. The curves
and measured copolar and cross-polar gain patterns are
provide a comparison of the measurements (blue lines) with three
shown in Fig. 14(a) and (b). The measured patterns are different numerical analysis results. Green lines: AFM method. Gray
compared with those produced by the analysis based on lines: GR-basis function continuous impedance BCs MoM. Red line:
the AFMs [51], by the Gaussian ring MoM code based on full-wave FMM for the textured layout.
D. Large Bandwidth
A technique to enlarge the operative bandwidth of an
MTS antenna consists of radially modifying the modulation
periodicity, i.e., the periodicity becomes a function of the
radial coordinate. Its values are chosen according to the
SW frequency dispersion. The antenna can then be con-
ceived as an active region device where different annular
rings are characterized by their own local period and are Fig. 16. Measured gain pattern of the very-high-gain MTS antenna
activated alternately as the frequency is changed to radiate prototype. (a) Copolar. (b) Cross polar. Inset: details of the feeder
a beam in the desired direction. (design and measurement done by Wave Up).
VIII. C H A L L E N G E S F O R S M A R T R A D I O
ENVIRONMENT
Fast reconfigurability of the beam and beam scanning
based on dynamic, electronically reconfigurable MTSs
are the most impactful challenges for rendering RIS
an enabling technology for SRE scenarios. This can be
Fig. 21. Example of multiport/multibeam antenna with MTS
achieved through the inclusion in the MTS of active printed over a unique substrate. The antenna can realize 19 beams
devices or tunable materials; this way, the electric features of about 15-dB directivity each. Right corner: layout of one of the
of the inclusions become voltage controlled, and hence, entries of the impedance tensor. Bottom: radiated beams directivity
the BCs offered by the MTS can be properly adjusted by maps in the uv plane for each excited port, obtained by a
homogenized-impedance full-wave analysis over the entire
an external control.
19-aperture structure. (Zoomed-in view of one u-v map with the
Although this concept has been already demonstrated scale is reported on the right.) The position of each u-v contour map
(see [57], [64], and [69]), existing solutions still need is associated with the analogous position of the space aperture
to be improved in terms of efficiency. In fact, active layout (see the arrows.)
Alternative strategies for reconfigurability of the RIS Furthermore, the operation principle of MTS antennas
consist of optical pumping photosensitive substrate with allows for tailoring, in real time, the MTS with active
MTSs printed on top. Silicon or gallium arsenide sub- devices or tunable materials. While the initial concern of
strates can be used, together with checkerboard-type self- sometimes ago about bandwidth is a challenge in fast
complementary MTSs’ CB-MTS. The vertexes of CB-MTS progress, losses, agility, and dynamic speed are still open
are disconnected by a small gap in off-conditions, and they issues for both design and fabrication technology aspects.
are virtually connected by the incident optical power den- Finally, the possibility to easily customize RIS features in
sity [73]. Since the gaps are very small (for instance at the the Fresnel zone and describe it in terms of rays opens the
level of few optical wavelengths), this allows to modify the possibility of a fast deterministic analysis of the SRE.
MTS configuration with an extremely small power [74].
Acknowledgment
3-D printing processes are also extremely appealing for
The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of sev-
MTS antennas, creating the possibility to move beyond the
eral people to the results shown in this article: Francesco
classic PCB processes, offering chances to build up the MTS
Caminita (Wave Up Srl, Siena, Italy) for the design of the
by adding specific features to the inclusions, and, hence,
high efficiency antenna in Fig. 15 and the FMM results,
improving performance at low cost.
Gabriele Minatti (Wave Up Srl) for the design of the
Other challenges arise from the complexity and large
very high-gain antenna in Fig. 16 and the multibeam
size of the MTSs required for SREs. Indeed, despite the
antenna in Fig. 21, Cristian Della Giovampaola (Wave
significant advances done in the development of the design
Up Srl) for the design of the multibeam antennas in
procedures described here, MTS optimization is still a
Fig. 20 and the measurements in Fig. 16, David Gonzalez-
future challenge topic. Whenever strong requirements on
Ovejero (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-
performance are demanded, it is necessary to optimize
Institut d’Electronique et des Technologies du numéRique
the final MTS layout, which may be composed of up to
(CNRS-IETR), Rennes, France) for the realization and
100 000 elements. Managing the high number of inclusions
measurements of the broadband antenna in Fig. 17,
with numerical methods, including electronic devices and
the multibeam antenna in Fig. 19, and the continuous
losses, requires smart strategies, which make combined
impedance boundary condition method of moments (IBC-
use of homogenized BCs and fast integral-equation solvers,
MoM) results, Marco Faenzi (University of Siena) for the
embedding an accurate model of the tunable elements.
design of the broadband antenna in Fig. 17, Prof. Charlotte
Tripon Canseliet (Ultimetas, Paris, France) for the realiza-
IX. C O N C L U S I O N tion of the multibeam antenna in Fig. 20, Alessio Cucini
This article has reviewed modeling, design, and simulation (WaveComm Srl, Siena) for the results in Fig. 13, Cristina
strategies for MTS-based reflecting surfaces and anten- Yepes (University of Siena, Siena) for the implementation
nas/sensors, which represents the key enablers for future of the anomalous reflector in Fig. 12, Romeo Beccherelli
SREs. Several practical realizations have been shown to [Istituto per la Microelettronica e Microsistemi (IMM),
illustrate the promising potential of this technology, includ- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)] and Valerio
ing overlapping apertures for multibeaming. Fast beam Martorelli (Ingegneria Dei Sistemi) for the realization of
hopping and multibeam operations with low power con- the antenna in Fig. 23, and Giorgio Giordanengo (Links)
sumption and low cost are interesting features for SRE. for the measurements of the antenna in Fig. 23.
REFERENCES
[1] C. Liaskos, S. Nie, A. Tsioliaridou, A. Pitsillides, pp. 1–72, May 2016. [14] L. Li and T. J. Cui, “Information
S. Ioannidis, and I. Akyildiz, “A new wireless [7] K. Achouri, M. A. Salem, and C. Caloz, “General metamaterials—From effective media to real-time
communication paradigm through metasurface synthesis based on susceptibility information processing systems,” Nanophotonics,
software-controlled metasurfaces,” IEEE Commun. tensors,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 703–724, Mar. 2019.
Mag., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 162–169, Sep. 2018. no. 7, pp. 2977–2991, Jul. 2015. [15] Q. Ma, G. D. Bai, H. B. Jing, C. Yang, L. Li, and
[2] M. D. Renzo et al., “Smart radio environments [8] F. Yang and Y. Rahmat-Samii, Surface T. J. Cui, “Smart metasurface with self-adaptively
empowered by reconfigurable AI meta-surfaces: Electromagnetics, With Applications in Antenna, reprogrammable functions,” Light, Sci. Appl.,
An idea whose time has come,” EURASIP J. Microwave, and Optical Engineering. Cambridge, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 98, Dec. 2019.
Wireless Commun. Netw., vol. 2019, no. 1, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019. [16] V. S. Asadchy, M. Albooyeh, S. N. Tcvetkova,
pp. 1–20, Dec. 2019. [9] A. Li, S. Singh, and D. Sievenpiper, “Metasurfaces A. Díaz-Rubio, Y. Ra’di, and S. A. Tretyakov,
[3] M. Di Renzo et al., “Smart radio environments and their applications,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, “Perfect control of reflection and refraction using
empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: no. 6, pp. 989–1011, Mar. 2018. spatially dispersive metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B,
How it works, state of research, and the road [10] T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, and Q. Cheng, Condens. Matter, vol. 94, no. 7, Aug. 2016,
ahead,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, “Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and Art. no. 075142.
no. 11, pp. 2450–2525, Nov. 2020. programmable metamaterials,” Light, Sci. Appl., [17] P. Nayeri, F. Yang, and A. Z. Elsherbeni,
[4] E. Basar, M. D. Renzo, J. De Rosny, M. Debbah, vol. 3, no. 10, p. e218, Oct. 2014. Reflectarray Antennas: Theory, Designs, and
M. Alouini, and R. Zhang, “Wireless [11] C. D. Giovampaola and N. Engheta, “Digital Applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2018.
communications through reconfigurable metamaterials,” Nature Mater., vol. 13, no. 12, [18] C. Pfeiffer and A. Grbic, “Millimeter-wave
intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 1115–1121, Sep. 2014. transmitarrays for wavefront and polarization
pp. 116753–116773, 2019. [12] T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, and Q. Cheng, control,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn.,
[5] F. Tariq et al., “A speculative study on 6G,” IEEE “Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 4407–4417, Dec. 2013.
Wireless Commun., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 118–125, programmable metamaterials,” Light, Sci. Appl., [19] N. Yu et al., “Flat optics: Controlling wavefronts
Aug. 2020. vol. 3, no. 10, p. e218, 2014. with optical antenna metasurfaces,” IEEE J. Sel.
[6] S. B. Glybovski, S. A. Tretyakov, P. A. Belov, [13] L. Li et al., “Electromagnetic reprogrammable Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 19, no. 3,
Y. S. Kivshar, and C. R. Simovski, “Metasurfaces: coding-metasurface holograms,” Nature Commun., p. 4700423, May/Jun. 2013.
From microwaves to visible,” Phys. Rep., vol. 634, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 197, Dec. 2017. [20] A. M. H. Wong and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Perfect
anomalous reflection with a bipartite Huygens’ Propag., vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3659–3668, A, Gen. Phys., vol. 8, no. 5, Nov. 2017,
metasurface,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2006. Art. no. 054048.
Feb. 2018, Art. no. 011036. [40] A. Diaz-Rubio and S. A. Tretyakov, “Macroscopic [57] D. F. Sievenpiper, “Forward and backward leaky
[21] A. Epstein and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Huygens’ modeling of anomalously reflecting metasurfaces: wave radiation with large effective aperture from
metasurfaces via the equivalence principle: Design Angular response and far-field scattering,” IEEE an electronically tunable textured surface,” IEEE
and applications,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B, Opt. Phys., Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 69, no. 10, Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, no. 1,
vol. 33, no. 2, p. A31, 2016. pp. 6560–6571, Oct. 2021. pp. 236–247, Jan. 2005.
[22] V. G. Ataloglou, M. Chen, M. Kim, and [41] F. Capolino, M. Albani, S. Maci, and L. B. Felsen, [58] O. Yurduseven, D. L. Marks, T. Fromenteze, and
G. V. Eleftheriades, “Microwave Huygens’ “Frequency-domain Green’s function for a planar D. R. Smith, “Dynamically reconfigurable
metasurfaces: Fundamentals and applications,” periodic semi-infinite phased array. I. Truncated holographic metasurface aperture for a mills-cross
IEEE J. Microw., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 374–388, floquet wave formulation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas monochromatic microwave camera,” Opt. Exp.,
Jan. 2021. Propag., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 67–74, Jan. 2000. vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 5281–5291, 2018.
[23] S. Maci, G. Minatti, M. Casaletti, and [42] F. Capolino, M. Albani, S. Maci, and L. B. Felsen, [59] M. Li, S. Xiao, J. Long, and D. F. Sievenpiper,
M. Bosiljevac, “Metasurfing: Addressing waves on “Frequency-domain Green’s function for a planar “Surface waveguides supporting both TM mode
impenetrable metasurfaces,” IEEE Antennas periodic semi-infinite phased array. II. Diffracted and TE mode with the same phase velocity,” IEEE
Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 1499–1502, wave phenomenology,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 9,
2011. Propag., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 75–85, Jan. 2000. pp. 3811–3819, Sep. 2016.
[24] R. Quarfoth and D. Sievenpiper, “Artificial tensor [43] A. Cucini and S. Maci, “Macro-scale basis [60] G. Minatti, E. Martini, and S. Maci, “Efficiency of
impedance surface waveguides,” IEEE Trans. functions for the method of moment analysis of metasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3597–3606, large periodic microstrip arrays,” Appl. Comput. Propag., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1532–1541, Apr. 2017.
Jul. 2013. Electromagn. Soc. J., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 256–266, [61] D. González-Ovejero and S. Maci, “Gaussian ring
[25] R. Quarfoth and D. Sievenpiper, “Surface wave Nov. 2006. basis functions for the analysis of modulated
scattering reduction using beam shifters,” IEEE [44] F. Mariottini, F. Capolino, S. Maci, and L. B. Felsen, metasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 13, “Asymptotic high-frequency Green’s function for a Propag., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3982–3993, Sep. 2015.
pp. 963–966, 2014. large rectangular planar periodic phased array of [62] D. González-Ovejero, G. Minatti,
[26] G. Minatti et al., “Modulated metasurface dipoles with weakly tapered excitation in two G. Chattopadhyay, and S. Maci, “Multibeam by
antennas for space: Synthesis, analysis and dimensions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., metasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
realizations,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 608–620, Feb. 2005. Propag., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2923–2930, Feb. 2017.
vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1288–1300, Apr. 2015. [45] F. Capolino, S. Maci, and L. B. Felsen, “Asymptotic [63] F. Caminita, E. Martini, G. Minatti, and S. Maci,
[27] B. H. Fong, J. S. Colburn, J. J. Ottusch, high-frequency Green’s function for a planar “Fast integral equation method for metasurface
J. L. Visher, and D. F. Sievenpiper, “Scalar and phased sectoral array of dipoles,” Radio Sci., antennas,” in Proc. URSI Int. Symp. Electromagn.
tensor holographic artificial impedance surfaces,” vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 579–593, Mar. 2000. Theory (EMTS), Aug. 2016, pp. 480–483.
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 58, no. 10, [46] S. Maci, F. Capolino, and L. B. Felsen, [64] F. Liu et al., “Intelligent metasurfaces with
pp. 3212–3221, Oct. 2010. “Three-dimensional Green’s function for planar continuously tunable local surface impedance for
[28] C. Pfeiffer and A. Grbic, “A printed, broadband rectangular phased dipole arrays,” Wave Motion, multiple reconfigurable functions,” Phys. Rev. A,
Luneburg lens antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 263–279, Sep. 2001. Gen. Phys., vol. 11, no. 4, Apr. 2019,
Propag., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 3055–3059, Sep. 2010. [47] F. Capolino and S. Maci, “Uniform high-frequency Art. no. 044024.
[29] M. Faenzi et al., “Metasurface antennas: New description of singly, doubly, and vertex diffracted [65] K. Chen et al., “A reconfigurable active Huygens’
models, applications and realizations,” Sci. Rep., rays for a plane angular sector,” J. Electromagn. metalens,” Adv. Mater., vol. 29, no. 17, May 2017,
vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Jul. 2019. Waves Appl., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1175–1197, Art. no. 1606422.
[30] S. Maci and A. Cucini, “FSS-based EBG surface,” Jan. 1996. [66] M. Kim and G. V. Eleftheriades,
in Electromagnetic Metamaterials: Physics and [48] F. Capolino and S. Maci, “Simplified closed-form “Guided-wave-excited binary Huygens’
Engineering Aspects, N. Engheta and R. Ziolkowski, expressions for computing the generalized Fresnel metasurfaces for dynamic radiated-beam shaping
Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2006. integral and their application to vertex with independent gain and scan-angle control,”
[31] M. A. Francavilla, E. Martini, S. Maci, and diffraction,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 9, Phys. Rev. A, Gen. Phys., vol. 15, no. 5, May 2021,
G. Vecchi, “On the numerical simulation of no. 1, pp. 32–37, May 1995. Art. no. 054037.
metasurfaces with impedance boundary condition [49] M. Albani, F. Capolino, G. Carluccio, and S. Maci, [67] S. Foo, “Liquid-crystal reconfigurable metasurface
integral equations,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., “UTD vertex diffraction coefficient for the reflectors,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas
vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2153–2161, May 2015. scattering by perfectly conducting faceted Propag. USNC/URSI Nat. Radio Sci. Meeting,
[32] E. Martini, F. Caminita, and S. Maci, “Double-scale structures,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, Jul. 2017, pp. 2069–2070.
homogenized impedance models for periodically no. 12, pp. 3911–3925, Dec. 2009. [68] J. Shabanpour, S. Beyraghi, and A. Cheldavi,
modulated metasurfaces,” EPJ Appl. Metamater., [50] M. Mencagli, Jr., E. Martini, and S. Maci, “Ultrafast reprogrammable multifunctional
vol. 7, p. 12, Jan. 2020. “Transition function for closed-form vanadium-dioxide-assisted metasurface for
[33] A. A. Oliner and A. Hessel, “Guided waves on representation of metasurface reactance,” IEEE dynamic THz wavefront engineering,” Sci. Rep.,
sinusoidally-modulated reactance surfaces,” IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 1, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2020, Art. no. 8950.
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 136–145, Jan. 2016. [69] A. Li, Z. Luo, H. Wakatsuchi, S. Kim, and
pp. 201–208, Dec. 1959. [51] G. Minatti, F. Caminita, E. Martini, and S. Maci, D. F. Sievenpiper, “Nonlinear, active, and tunable
[34] F. Caminita, E. Martini, and S. Maci, “Exact “Flat optics for leaky-waves on modulated metasurfaces for advanced electromagnetics
solution for anisotropic, periodically modulated metasurfaces: Adiabatic Floquet-wave analysis,” applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 5,
boundary conditions excited by a surface wave,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 27439–27452, 2017.
in Proc. 9th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag. (EuCAP), pp. 3896–3906, Sep. 2016. [70] E. Martini et al., “Reconfigurable antenna based
Jan. 2015. [52] G. Minatti, F. Caminita, E. Martini, M. Sabbadini, on liquid crystals for continuous beam scanning
[35] N. Yu et al., “Light propagation with phase and S. Maci, “Synthesis of modulated-metasurface with a single control,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp.
discontinuities: Generalized laws of reflection and antennas with amplitude, phase, and polarization Antennas Propag. USNC-URSI Radio Sci. Meeting,
refraction,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6054, control,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, Jul. 2019, pp. 449–450.
pp. 333–337, Oct. 2011. no. 9, pp. 3907–3919, Sep. 2016. [71] S. C. Pavone, E. Martini, F. Caminita, M. Albani,
[36] Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. You, and R. Zhang, [53] N. M. Estakhri and A. Alù, “Wave-front and S. Maci, “Surface wave dispersion for a
“Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless transformation with gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. tunable grounded liquid crystal substrate without
communications: A tutorial,” IEEE Trans. Rev. X, vol. 6, no. 4, Oct. 2016, Art. no. 041008. and with metasurface on top,” IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313–3351, [54] V. S. Asadchy, M. Albooyeh, S. N. Tcvetkova, Antennas Propag., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 3540–3548,
May 2021. A. Díaz-Rubio, Y. Ra’di, and S. A. Tretyakov, Jul. 2017.
[37] J. Budhu and A. Grbic, “Perfectly reflecting “Perfect control of reflection and refraction using [72] C. D. Giovampaola, F. Caminita, G. Labate,
metasurface reflectarrays: Mutual coupling spatially dispersive metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, E. Martini, and S. Maci, “Experimental verification
modeling between unique elements through Condens. Matter, vol. 94, no. 7, Aug. 2016, of a 5G active metasurface antenna with beam
homogenization,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Art. no. 075142. steering capabilities,” in Proc. 15th Eur. Conf.
vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 122–134, Jan. 2021. [55] C. Yepes, M. Faenzi, S. Maci, and E. Martini, Antennas Propag. (EuCAP), 2021.
[38] A. Cucini and S. Maci, “A compact formula for the “Perfect non-specular reflection with polarization [73] D. González-Ovejero et al., “Basic properties of
array factor of planar phased arrays with control by using a locally passive metasurface checkerboard metasurfaces,” IEEE Antennas
polygonal shape and skewed grid,” IEEE Antennas sheet on a grounded dielectric slab,” Appl. Phys. Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 406–409, 2014.
Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 1, pp. 138–141, 2002. Lett., vol. 118, no. 23, Jun. 2021, Art. no. 231601. [74] H. Krraoui et al., “Characterization of
[39] A. Cucini, “High-frequency Green’s function for [56] D. R. Smith, O. Yurduseven, L. P. Mancera, optically-reconfigurable metasurfaces by a free
planar periodic phased arrays with skewed grid P. Bowen, and N. B. Kundtz, “Analysis of a space microwave bistatic technique,” Appl. Sci.,
and polygonal contour,” IEEE Trans. Antennas waveguide-fed metasurface antenna,” Phys. Rev. vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4353, Jun. 2020.
Open Access funding provided by ‘University of Siena’ within the CRUI CARE Agreement