Chapter 6 Sampling
Chapter 6 Sampling
1
The complete list of the members of a population is known as sampling frame or source list.
The complete list should be comprehensive, correct, reliable and appropriate. It is absolutely
essential for the source list to be representative of the universe as possible. For example if
you are interested in studying about gender differences in mathematics achievements of
freshman students at Addis Ababa University, the sampling frame is the list of the names of
all freshman male and female students at the university in a given academic year. In this case,
you are ready to identify the sample units for your study.
3. Selecting a Representative Sample: - After defining a population and preparing a sample
frame, researcher selects a sample of units form the source list by using appropriate
techniques. The process of such a selection is known as sampling. To serve a useful purpose,
sampling should be unbiased or representative. A good sample must be as nearly
representative of the entire population as possible and ideally it must provide the whole of
information about the population from which the sample has been drawn.
4. Obtaining an Adequate Sample: - The size of sample should be optimum, which is neither
excessively large nor too small. An optimum or adequate sample is one, which fulfills the
requirements of efficiency, representatives, reliability and flexibility. In principle, a small
sample is sufficient for homogenous group population, but a much larger sample is necessary
if there is greater variability in the units of the population. The determination of the size of a
sample should be seen in view of the degree of the precision of the investigation, the size of
the population, the type of the research used, the parameters of interest in a research study,
the size of the population variance, and the costs of the research.
There are several alternative ways of taking a sample. The major alternative sampling plans may
be grouped into probability techniques and non-probability techniques.
In probability sampling every element in the population has a known nonzero probability of
selection. Probability sampling designs are used when the representativeness of the sample is of
importance in the interest of wider generalisability. When time or other factors, rather than
generalisability, become critical, non-probability sampling is generally used.
In non-probability sampling the probability of any particular element of the population being
chosen is unknown. The selection of units in non-probability sampling is quite arbitrary, as
researchers rely heavily on personal judgment. It should be noted that there are no appropriate
statistical techniques for measuring random sampling error from a non-probability sample.
In non-probability sampling designs, the elements in the population do not have any
probabilities attached to their being chosen as sample subjects. This means that the findings
from the study of the sample cannot be confidently generalized to the population. However the
2
researchers may at times be less concerned about generalisability than obtaining some
preliminary information in a quick and inexpensive way.
Purposive Sampling
Depending upon the type of topic, the researcher lays down the criteria for the subjects to be
included in the sample. Whoever meets that criteria could be selected in the sample. The
researcher might select such cases or might provide the criteria to somebody else and leave it to
his/her judgment for the actual selection of the subjects. That is why such a sample is also called
as judgmental or expert opinion sample. For example a researcher is interested in studying
students who are enrolled in a course on research methods, are highly regular, are frequent
participants in the class discussions, and often come with new ideas. The criteria has been laid
down, the researcher may do this job himself/herself, or may ask the teacher of this class to
select the students by using the said criteria. In the latter situation we are leaving it to the
judgment of the teacher to select the subjects.
Snowball Sampling
Snowball sampling (also called network, chain referral, or reputational sampling) is a method
for identifying and sampling (or selecting) cases in the network.
3
refers to a variety of procedure in which initial respondents are not selected through probability
methods, but in which additional respondents are then obtained from information provided by
initial respondents.
For example, a researcher examines friendship networks among teenagers in a community. He
or she begins with three teenagers who do not know each other. Each teen names four close
friends. The researcher then goes to the four friends and asks each to name four close friends, then
goes to those four and does the same thing again, and so forth. Before long, a large number of
people are involved. Each person in the sample is directly or indirectly tied to the original
teenagers, and several people may have named the same person. The researcher eventually
stops, either because no new names are given, indicating a closed network, or because the
network is so large that it is at the limit of what he or she can study.
All people in sampling frame are divided into "strata" (groups or categories). Within each
stratum, a simple random sample or systematic sample is selected.
Example - If we want to ensure that a sample of 5 students from a group of 50 contains both
male and female students in same proportions as in the full population (i.e. the group of 50), we
4
first divide that population into male and female. In this case, there are 22 male students and 28
females. To work out the number of males and females in the sample........
We obviously can't interview .2 of a person or .8 of a person, and have to "round" the numbers.
Therefore we choose 2 males and 3 females in the sample. These would be selected using simple
random or systematic sample methods.