Urban vs Rural Indian Caste Stratification
Urban vs Rural Indian Caste Stratification
McKIM MARRIOTT
demonstrable
demonstral
rank cquivalent to that of the urban Brahmans. Currently urban type of
rank
in the of
traits must be most new participants
emphasized by society of
many
newcomers,
the
stratification, for in a metropolitan been
established locally or
their original
of rank in tes as-
of castes
h u n d r e d s of castes
as
units to
ts members
approximation
the
as The defer.
increasingly
regarded not of
individuals.
Rural Stratification
Irdivdual Prestige
To emphasize the importance of
corporate caste considerations in run
stratification is not to deny the importance of a distinct
phenomenon
McKim Marriott
individual prestige rural as well as urban 53
in
component, but
only one communities. Caste rank
is an important component an individual's
of
in the rural type of
prestige stratification
dividuals and groups in (Marriott 1052 869-14).
cities, individual members
ges may further gain or lose in rank
castes in villages of ranked
attributes and behaviour, but according to their
individu
especially
and power. Recognized rural indices ording according to their
wealth
of prestige
elegance of
ceremonial erformances and include the
nclude
the numbers of other
who can be mustered to persons
participate in them. Striving for individual
restige, and on the opPOSite side, declining in prestige through
wealth and power-these do not distinguish the urban from oss
the type of stratification discussed above. Individual effort to
dse above the standing of one's caste appears to be a common and per
sis feature of Indian society, as important among the individu-
alistic 'renouncers of medieval Tirupati studied by Stein as among the
ambitious twentieth-century villagers studied now by Rowe and
Harper
Individuals stand to gain in one component of their prestige if their
castes can rise as corporations. But for far too long, observers of Hindu
society have assumed that individual striving is always and wholly
absorbed in group efforts toward caste mobility. Actually the ambi-
tions of an individual villager or a ural family may conflict with the
ambitions of the caste, as in the poignant Holeru example: if these low-
caste rural labourers refuse to perform their traditional, caste-defiling
services for Brahman landowners, they must give up their individu-
It was the initial in-
ally profitable and prestige-helping indentures.
an individual Holeru to gain
comefrom his indenture which permitted villagers generally.
prestige among his caste-fellows, perhaps among for members of his caste
and now certainly a better average standing his indentured status,
If he keeps
inthecity-dominated larger society. economic power andlong
theindividual Holeru may gain immediate in relation to
security, but be forced into caste-polluting services
lefm
a lower caste rank locally
is Brahman master, thus retaining of individual Noniyas who had
ambitions
Onthe other hand, the of providing localserv
livelihood independent
uale means of to the corporate
movement
added impetus
ccem tohave given Where there are
extemal
tiouscastes lose at home through their new contempt for local cus
they
may ultimately gain in the books of the state and nation,
may ulti
tom
olitically and economically as well as in the positive evaluation of
their style
of life.
Considering the pains and inherent contradictions of referring one's
behaviourto nonlocal scales and models, we may reasonably ask why
such behaviour occurs, and why it occurs now at an apparently accel-
erating pace? Rowe and Harper both illuminate an essential dynamic:
the
the
discrepancy between the low local ritual rank of a caste and its
hicher economic or political standing either outside or inside the com-
munity. Wealthy Noniya highway contractors were the first to become
Cauhans' while the Holerus wooed by the Congress Party were leaders
of the agitation for caste reform. Ihe extermal stimuli in these cases are
ike those notedbyBailey for the state monopoly-holding Boad Distill.
ers orthe politically patronized Pan Untouchables ("Boad Outcastes)
ofBisipara in Orissa (Bailey 1957: 186-98, 211-27). In each case, dis-
crepancies between local and external rank in the initial situation
were evidently felt as more painful than the difficulties that would en-
sure from attempting mobility. If opportunities for greater achieve
ment or influence by low-caste people outside the village increase,
then extemal reference behaviour must also tend to increase.
Inherently, of course, broader references to more famous models
have a grander sound. Inherently, too, the broader the scope of the ref-
erence, the less capable it may prove of precise application at local
levels. One may speculate that a part of the seeing flexibility and
changeability of caste participation in the rituals of the Tirupati temple
examined by Stein may be due to the disjunction between such vague
scriptural varna categories as 'twice-born' and 'Sudra' on the one hand
and the diversity of South Indian regional caste groups on the other.
Broader, more external reference also helps a rural caste group to es-
cape denial of its claims locally. For this reason, if for no other, refer
ences to the civilization-wide varna categories would seem favoured
over claims of more local, regional, or sectarian scope. Certain small
Kingdoms of Kerala, like the Kandyan kingdom in Ceylon, seem to
nave had means for establishing ranks and adjudicating claims by
nole castes throughout a small region. But regular procedures for
mizing claims are typically lacking from the higher levels of
58 Caste Systems
Indian
References in
Aultiple Maratha
ruler Sivaji
Sivaji wistshe
wi
recognized
t u r y
as
'Kshatriya', he
he soug
o
have bi
to have
himself (and thus his caste) Maharashtrian priest, residen
vour from a certain
learned
superior
that jurisdiction, so t
con
tention could be allayed
Banaras. This priest hadultimately ference.
no formally to the extent
Claims
Marathas
that
reterming8
Ma to
deference.
rring to
referri Claims to.
onquerors could
general
gional categories, such as the claims
command Marathas'
of Kinbis to be Marathas
ceed on.
Marathas to be "Rajputs', seem typically claims
to OcCur
byand
preponderant
to succe powe
its claims
erant pow
by prepondera poweg
can support
when aspir group
wnen the aspirant
t h e m s e l v e s fora
in the relevant zone of
reference organized
when they first
first organ power. The
The Noniyas of Senapur, held preponderant
rank, in no way clans through th
advance in caste
scale of Rajput
to the regional been passed ov
extemal reference well have
'Cauhan' descent might
verbal claim of without
conflict
berween
Noniya
and
without political testing,
local visible gesture of don
Thakurs. But the Noniyas
and the local Dobhi local Thakurs prerogative
thread which had been the
ning the sacred Thakurs, who evident
reprisalsby the
subjectedthem toimmediate it seems, as the
Thakurs themselve
insulted. (Only later,
felt aped and c i v i l i z a t i o n a l "twice-bom
tions.
note that changes in the favoured scope of inter
Historically we can
caste reference behaviour have in these examples as elsewhere
tended to accompany changes in the modes of communication. Claims
of less extreme scope, often modified by sectarian membership, seem
to have been common during the centuries preceding British domi-
nation, although the absolute number of such claims may have bee
fewer. As printing and increased education
helped to dissemina
knowledge of a simplified and redefined classical Indian culture mo
widely, references the civilizational varna categories became
to ore
frequent. The recent developments of
media, and of a national search for mass education, radio, an been
international respect,
accompanied by more frequent rural orientation
achievement and class values towards occupau cupational
Conclusion
The main import of these remarks is to stress the
need for a number of
new analytic notions in order to
understand what any given effort at
caste mobility is abOut. 1 think that we must at the
outset be aware of
the contrast between closed, interactional, rural
systems of
tion on the one hand and open, attributional, urban systems on the
stratifica
other hand. Since orientations to the city or village are states of mind,
rural or urban residents may refer their behaviour to either or both
kinds of contrasting systems
We need further distinguish the ranking and movement of castes as
witl: ritual dominance and from the
corporations concen ed pollution
ranking and movement of individuals or groups concermed with wealth,
to either or both kinds of
power, or prestige, for a given act may relate
units in mutually affiming or mutually denying ways. of castes, we must
Finally, to understand the ranking and mobilityto which of the sev-
and specify
determine the felt locus of each caste audiences-local, regional, sec-
relevant hierarchies and
eral possibly behaviour is referred by itself and
civilizational, or national-its
tarian, worlds in our minds can
we hope to