0% found this document useful (0 votes)
876 views4 pages

dm2023-0010 - 2022 Hospital Scorecard Rating Scale Only PDF

1. The document provides a 2022 rating scale for hospital scorecard indicators with targets and rating ranges for 6 key performance indicators: 1) % of patients in basic accommodation with zero co-payment, 2) % of returned PhilHealth claims, 3) % of ER patients with <4 hours turnaround time, 4) % of patients with <4 hours discharge process turnaround time, 5) hospital acquired infection rate, and 6) % of inpatient laboratory tests with <5 hours turnaround time. 2. Indicators are rated on a scale of 1-5 based on their performance compared to the target range, with 5 being the highest rating. 3. Definitions and exclusions are provided for

Uploaded by

mj vibar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
876 views4 pages

dm2023-0010 - 2022 Hospital Scorecard Rating Scale Only PDF

1. The document provides a 2022 rating scale for hospital scorecard indicators with targets and rating ranges for 6 key performance indicators: 1) % of patients in basic accommodation with zero co-payment, 2) % of returned PhilHealth claims, 3) % of ER patients with <4 hours turnaround time, 4) % of patients with <4 hours discharge process turnaround time, 5) hospital acquired infection rate, and 6) % of inpatient laboratory tests with <5 hours turnaround time. 2. Indicators are rated on a scale of 1-5 based on their performance compared to the target range, with 5 being the highest rating. 3. Definitions and exclusions are provided for

Uploaded by

mj vibar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Annex’A:,

2022 Hospital Scorecard Rating Scale

Target Rating Scale


Indicator Formula/ Operational Definition Range of. the Actual
2022 Score
Accomplishment

100% 0,
5
Numerator: Number of patients in basic
accommodation with zero co-payment
Indicator 1. Denominator: Total number of patients in 95.00% - 99.99% 4

IPC
basic accommodation

_for
% patients in basic
100%
accommodation with
: .

zero co-payment . .
90.00% - 94.99% 3
*Basic accommodation refers to ward
accommodation. This indicator measures how
many patients in basic/ward accommodation are
with zero co-payment or No-Balance Billing. 89.99% and below 2

5
Numerator: Number of PhilHealth claims

personne]
returned to hospital
Level 1 Will not be 4
and 2: included in the
Denominator: Total number of PhilHealth
. 2022 Hospital
claims processed and returned to hospital +
:

3
<6% Scorecard
2.
;
claims processed and paid by PhilHealth
: :

Indicator
2
% of Returned-to *% of RTH claims isthe percentage of PhilHealth
claims which were returned to the hospital due to
Hospital of the
some deficiency with certain requirements, 5
PhilHealth claims
among all
the PhilHealth claims processed.
Will not be
3: 4
in
Level .
EXCLUSION: included the
1. Auto-rejected claims (which the hospital °
2022 Hospital
will identify and provide documentation) <2% 3
Scorecard
2. All COVID-19 laboratory procedures
claims 2

Numerator: Number of ER Patients with <4 100% 5


hours Turnaround Time
Denominator: Total number of patients who
were received in the ER
Indicator 3. 95.00% - 99.99% 4

4%
of ER Patients with <
, .
*ER TAT
is defined as the time interval from the
time the patient is received in the ER up to the
100%
4 hours Turnaround time the patient is released (admitted
Time /discharged), minus the time spent by the medical 90.00% - 94.99% 3

_donning/doffing/other
rocedures when to the
attending patient.
The decision to admit/discharge may not reflect
the actual transfer of the patients from the ER to
wards/rooms. DOA is excluded
but ER deaths are included.
in
this indicator, 89.99% and below 2
as
95.00% - 100%

Numerator: Number of patients with <4


hours Discharge Process Turnaround Time
Indicator 4. Denominator: Total number of patients 90.25% - 94.99%
% of patients with<4 ‘discharged
:
°
95%
hours Discharge Process
*Disch
ischarge P Process TAT is defined as the titime
is

defined
Turnaround Time
the

interval between discharge order of the doctor 85.50% - 90.24%


and the actual discharge of the patient. Deaths are
not included in this indicator

85.49% and below

Numerator: Total number of inpatients who


had infection after 48 hours upon admission
Denominator: . Total number of discharges
. : 0% - 0.99%
Indicator 5. and deaths occurring after 48 hours upon
.
admission during the same year
<1%
/

Hospital Acquired
Infection Rate (%) *Based on General Appropriations Act 2021
DOH Commitment with a target of <I% for
Hospital Acquired Infection Rate. Including all 1.00% and above
types of HAI (Device- VAP, CLABSI, CAUTI;
and Non-device-SSI)

Numerator: No. of inpatient laboratory test 95.00% - 100%


results with < 5 hours Turnaround Time
Denominator: Total number of
inpatient
laboratory tests
.
Indicator 6. 90.25% - 94.99%
j : *Laboratory test results TAT is defined as the
%
%
inpatient
of of
time interval between the doctor’s order request
laboratory test result in the chart and the release of results.
°
95%
with < 5 hours Inclusion: Scope of lab tests- routine clinical and
85.50% - 90.24%
Turnaround Time hematologic lab tests only (CBC, Platelet Count,
aPTT, FBS, Na, K, Creatinine, UA, BUN, Total
Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, Triglyceride, SGOT,
SGPT, Urinalysis)
Exclusion: Histopathologic and microbiological
85.49% and below
°,

test requests, other lab tests which require fasting

ISO 2015
accreditation
+ PGS (Stage 2 or
.
Indicator 7. PGs
any stages above)
seas aoa: and/or other
Accreditation to ISO, Accreditation of the hospital to ISO, PGS, or :
:

Complian international
PGS or international
ses
any international accreditation body ce Stage «att
accreditation
accrediting body (Stage 2)

ISO 2015
accreditation + PGS
Stage 1
ISO 2015
accreditation +
Attended the PGS
module/bootcamp
but not yet initiated

ISO 2015
accreditation only
(No PGS accreditation)

Or

PGS accreditation
(Stage 1 or any
stage) only
(No ISO 2015
accreditation)

Attended the PGS


module/bootcamp
but not yet
initiated only
(No ISO 2015
accreditation)

No ISO 2015
accreditation + No
PGS accreditation

The overall score in the Report Card Survey


which reflects results in terms of two core Will not be
Indicator 8. areas: included in the
95%°
Report Card Survey : vos 2022 Hospital
(1) Compliance with ARTA Provisions and
:

(RCS) Scores Scorecay d


(2) Overall Client Satisfaction.

4 or more
researches

3 researches
Total number of clinical or operational
improvement research output which are: Level 1
and 2: .

1. Funded by the
hospital, or; 2 researches
2. Presented to a _local/international 4
Indicator 9.
Research output
consortium and conference (including
hospital and intradepartmental consortia) I research

*Must satisfy at least 1 of the given criteria for No research


the research to be counted.
**Published case study/series (unique or rare
case) are counted as researches. 9 or more
Level 3: researches

9
7-8 researches
5-6 researches 3

3-4 researches 2

0-2 researches 1

Submitted by:

MA. THERESA
Director IV
&. YERA, MD, MSc, MHA, CESO
III
Health Facility Development Bureau

Concurred by:

ENRIQUE

North Luzon
pf
Undersecretary of Heal
PHSAE, FPSMID, CESO

Field Implementation and Coordination Team (FICT)-


III NESTOR
F. SANTIAGO, JR., MD, MPHC, MHSA, CESO II
Undersecretary of Health
Field Implementation and Coordination Team (FICT)-
NCR
and South Luzon

CAMILO
Undersecretary ofHealth
SCOLAN, MPM, CESE ABDULLAH B. D
Undersecretary of Healt
, JR., MD, MPA, CESO I

Field Implementation and Coordination Team (FICT)- Field Implementation an¥ Yoordination Team (FICT)-
Visayas Mindanao

Approved by:

UA J
LILIBETH C. DAVID, MD, MPH, MPM, CESO I
Undersecretary of Health
Health Policy and Infrastructure Devetopment Team

You might also like