ANNEX C Back to
APCPI Revised Scoring and Rating System
No. Assessment Conditions Poor/Not Compliant (0) Acceptable (1) Satisfactory (2) Very Satisfactory/Compliant (3)
0 1 2 3
PILLAR I. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Indicator 1. Competitive Bidding as Default Method of Procurement
Percentage of competitive bidding and limited source bidding contracts in
1 Below 70.00% Between 70.00-80.99% Between 81.00-90.99% Between 91.00-100%
terms of amount of total procurement
Percentage of competitive bidding and limited source bidding contracts in
2 Below 20.00% Between 20.00- 39.99% Between 40.00-50.00% Above 50.00%
terms of volume of total procurement
Indicator 2. Limited Use of Alternative Methods of Procurement
3 Percentage of shopping contracts in terms of amount of total procurement Above 7.00% Between 5.00-7.00 % Between 3.00-4.99 % Below 3.00%
4 Percentage of negotiated contracts in terms of amount of total procurement Above 15.00% Between 9.00 -15.00% Between 4.00-8.99% Below 4.00%
5 Percentage of direct contracting in terms of amount of total procurement Above 4.00% Between 3.00-4.00% Between 1.00-2.99% Below 1.00%
Percentage of repeat order contracts in terms of amount of total
6 Above 4.00% Between 3.00-4.00% Between 1.00-2.99% Below 1.00%
procurement
7 Compliance with Repeat Order procedures Not Compliant Compliant
8 Compliance with Limited Source Bidding procedures Not Compliant Compliant
Indicator 3. Competitiveness of the Bidding Process
9 Average number of entities who acquired bidding documents Below 3.00 3.00-3.99 4.00-5.99 6.00 and above
10 Average number of bidders who submitted bids Below 2.00 2.00-2.99 3.00-4.99 5.00 and above
11 Average number of bidders who passed eligibility stage Below 1.00 1.00 – 1.99 2.00-2.99 3.00 and above
12 Sufficiency of period to prepare bids Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
Use of proper and effective procurement documentation and technical
13 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
specifications/requirements
PILLAR II. AGENCY INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND MANAGEMENT CAPACITY
Indicator 4. Presence of Procurement Organizations
14 Creation of Bids and Awards Committee(s) Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
15 Presence of a BAC Secretariat or Procurement Unit Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
Indicator 5. Procurement Planning and Implementation
16 An approved APP that includes all types of procurement Not Compliant Compliant
Preparation of Annual Procurement Plan for Common-Use Supplies and
17 Equipment (APP-CSE) and Procurement of Common-Use Supplies and Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
Equipment from the Procurement Service
18 Existing Green Specifications for GPPB-identified non-CSE items are adopted Not Compliant Compliant
Indicator 6. Use of Government Electronic Procurement System
19 Percentage of bid opportunities posted by the PhilGEPS-registered Agency Below 70.99% Between 71.00-80.99% Between 81.00-90.99% Above 91.00%
Percentage of contract award information posted by the PhilGEPS-registered
20 Below 20.00% Between 20.00- 50.99% Between 51.00-80.00% Above 80.00%
Agency
No. Assessment Conditions Poor/Not Compliant (0) Acceptable (1) Satisfactory (2) Very Satisfactory/Compliant (3)
0 1 2 3
Percentage of contract awards procured through alternative methods posted
21 Below 20.00% Between 20.00 - 50.99% Between 51.00-80.00% Above 80.00%
by the PhilGEPS-registered Agency
Indicator 7. System for Disseminating and Monitoring Procurement Information
Presence of website that provides up-to-date procurement information easily
22 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
accessible at no cost
Preparation of Procurement Monitoring Reports using the GPPB-prescribed
23 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
format, submission to the GPPB, and posting in agency website
PILLAR III. PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS AND MARKET PRACTICES
Indicator 8. Efficiency of Procurement Processes
Percentage of total amount of contracts signed within the assessment year
24 Below 40.00% or above 100.00% Between 40.00- 60.99% Between 61.00% -80.00% Above 80.00%
against total amount in the approved APPs
Percentage of total number of contracts signed against total number of
25 Below 90.00% Between 90.00- 92.99% Between 93.00-95.00% Above 95.00%
procurement projects done through competitive bidding
Planned procurement activities achieved desired contract outcomes and
26 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
objectives within the target/allotted timeframe
Indicator 9. Compliance with Procurement Timeframes
Percentage of contracts awarded within prescribed period of action to
27 Below 90.00% Between 90.00 to 95.99% Between 96.00 to 99.99% 100%
procure goods
Percentage of contracts awarded within prescribed period of action to
28 Below 90.00% Between 90.00 to 95.99% Between 96.00 to 99.99% 100%
procure infrastructure projects
Percentage of contracts awarded within prescribed period of action to
29 Below 90.00% Between 90.00 to 95.99% Between 96.00 to 99.99% 100%
procure consulting services
Indicator 10. Capacity Building for Government Personnel and Private Sector Participants
There is a system within the procuring entity to evaluate the performance of
30 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
procurement personnel on a regular basis
Percentage of participation of procurement staff in procurement training
31 Less than 60.00% Trained Between 60.00-75.99% Trained Between 76-90% of staff trained Between 91.00-100% Trained
and/or professionalization program
The procuring entity has open dialogue with private sector and ensures access
32 Not Compliant Compliant
to the procurement opportunities of the procuring entity
Indicator 11. Management of Procurement and Contract Management Records
The BAC Secretariat has a system for keeping and maintaining procurement
33 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
records
Implementing Units has and is implementing a system for keeping and
34 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
maintaining complete and easily retrievable contract management records
Indicator 12. Contract Management Procedures
Agency has defined procedures or standards in such areas as quality control,
35 acceptance and inspection, supervision of works and evaluation of Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
contractors’ performance
36 Timely Payment of Procurement Contracts After 45 days Between 38-45 days Between 31-37 days On or before 30 days
PILLAR IV. INTEGRITY AND TRANSPARENCY OF AGENCY PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
Indicator 13. Observer Participation in Public Bidding
No. Assessment Conditions Poor/Not Compliant (0) Acceptable (1) Satisfactory (2) Very Satisfactory/Compliant (3)
0 1 2 3
Observers are invited to attend stages of procurement as prescribed in the
37 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
IRR
Indicator 14. Internal and External Audit of Procurement Activities
Creation and operation of Internal Audit Unit (IAU) that performs specialized
38 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
procurement audits
39 Audit Reports on procurement related transactions Below 60% compliance Between 61-70.99% compliance Between 71-89.99% compliance Above 90-100% compliance
Indicator 15. Capacity to Handle Procurement Related Complaints
The Procuring Entity has an efficient procurement complaints system and has
40 Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
the capacity to comply with procedural requirements
Indicator 16. Anti-Corruption Programs Related to Procurement
41 Agency has a specific anti-corruption program/s related to procurement Not Compliant Partially Compliant Substantially Compliant Fully Compliant
