Flute Repertoire Influenced by The Japanese Sakuhachi
Flute Repertoire Influenced by The Japanese Sakuhachi
by
Constance L. Kelley
W
A DISSERTATION
IE
Presented to the Faculty of
EV
The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska
Lincoln, Nebraska
May, 2008
UMI Number: 3297806
Copyright 2008 by
Kelley, Constance L.
W
All rights reserved.
IE
EV
PR
The Japanese bamboo vertical flute, known as the shakuhachi, has captured the
attention and interest of many outside of Japan since World War II. With the rising
interest in the shakuhachi has come a new trend in composition, that of unaccompanied
W
repertoire for the Western silver flute influenced by the Japanese shakuhachi. Composers
introduction into aspects of Japanese musical culture and basic shakuhachi performance
techniques. This information is then applied to three pieces from the modern flute
PR
repertoire selected for their diversity in notational systems and shakuhachi techniques
A formal and tonal analysis, as is relevant to such works, is also applied. It is hoped that
the knowledge and understanding gained from this discussion will permit a more
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
CHAPTERS
1. INRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. THE SHAKUHACHI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
History (5)
Musical Culture (9)
Characteristic Performance Techniques (10)
Japanese Modal Practice (14)
W
3. SHAKUHACHI by FRANK MICHAEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Composer Biography (16) IE
Notational Considerations (16)
Shakuhachi Gestures (19)
Meri-kari
EV
Nayashi
Muraiki
Formal and Tonal Analysis (23)
6. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
W
IE
EV
PR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
During the slow and often interrupted evolution of this document I have
accumulated many depts. First, I want to thank my advisor Dr. John R. Bailey for his
unending support, inspiration, and patience throughout my doctoral program. From him I
have learned to see music differently, more thoroughly, and to be inquisitive and seek
answers. It is through him that I was first exposed to the shakuhachi when Yoshio
first year as a graduate student. My appreciation also goes out to the members of my
W
graduate committee, especially Dr. Peter Lefferts and Dr. William McMullen, who have
been there with support and guidance, attended each of my performances with such
IE
enthusiasm, and served as my reading committee.
EV
I am and will be forever grateful to composers Shirish Korde and Frank Michael
for their interest and willingness to work with me on this project, their prompt responses,
and for their contribution to the modern flute repertoire. Additionally, publishers of the
PR
compositions included in this document were helpful in crossing any language barrier
and/or acted as spokesperson for the composers of the selected works. I am indebted to
Tsutomu Kawashima of Muramatsu and Ulrike Osterhage and Saskia Barber, both
Zimmermann representatives, who endured and answered my many emails. Thank you,
too, to the host of others too numerous to mention who have assisted my research.
Finally, to my husband, all my family, friends, and colleagues – thank you for the
Table Page
Example
1. Sutebyoshi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2. Nayashi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
W
3. Min′yō scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
IE
4. Miyako Bushi scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7b. Michael, Shakuhachi Op. 38, Nr. 5, Nayashi in standard Western notation . . . . 22
8b. Michael, Shakuhachi Op. 38, Nr. 5, Nayashi in standard Western notation . . . . . 22
11. Michael, Shakuhachi Op. 38, Nr. 5, decorative figure at the close of the B section . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
W
22. Korde, Tenderness of Cranes, Min′yō scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
IE
23. Korde, Tenderness of Cranes Section VI, melodic material from Section II . . . . . 45
W
42. Fukushima, Shun-san, Sound Amalgam #3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
IE
43a. Fukushima, Shun-san end of ninth system, Sound Amalgam #4a . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Hitoyogiri – One-node cutting; single section cut [of bamboo]. A sixteenth century
ancestor to the shakuhachi.
.
Honkyoku – Basic pieces; original pieces collected from mid-eighteenth century komusō
temples.
W
Karakara – A characteristic shakuhachi performance technique; similar to the
korokoro technique, this tremolo is performed by rapidly tapping the first hole.
IE
Kari – A characteristic shakuhachi performance technique which raises a pitch by
altering the blowing angle and/or tightening the embouchure muscles.
Additionally, pitch may be altered with the use of cross-fingerings or partially
EV
covering finger holes. Kari is often spoken of in conjunction with meri.
Komosō – Traveling beggar-priests from the sixteenth century identified by the rice-straw
mat and instrument (hitoyogiri) they carried.
Komusō – Japanese traveling priests from the eighteenth century identified by the baskets
worn over their heads; priests of emptiness and nothingness.
Ma – Space, silence.
xi
Min′yō – The “folk song” scale; a pentatonic scale produced by uncovering the holes on
the shakuhachi one at a time from the bottom up.
Miyako Bushi – The “urban melodies” scale; a scale used in traditional shakuhachi
repertoire that requires the use of meri.
W
Nayashi – A characteristic shakuhachi performance technique which gradually raises a
pitch by a half-step without changing the fingering but rather by altering the
IE
blowing angle.
Sankyoku – A secular chamber ensemble that consisted of the koto, the shamisen, and the
shakuhachi.
PR
W
IE
EV
PR
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The Japanese bamboo vertical flute, known as the shakuhachi, has captured the
attention and interest of many outside of Japan since World War II. Musicians of all
sorts, non-musicians, ethnomusicologists, and others have been drawn to the beauty,
artistry, history, and music of the instrument and its performers. Evidence of this
mounting interest is seen through the number of shakuhachi societies that have been
established, the international festivals held to celebrate the instrument, and the annual
W
summer camps that have appeared recently. The very first shakuhachi society, The
IE
International Shakuhachi Society, was founded nearly twenty years ago in England,
1988. Since then, regional shakuhachi societies have shot-up around the world in
EV
Australia, British Columbia, the Netherlands, and throughout the United States, which
further indicates the growing patronage for the instrument. In addition, Bissei-Cho,
PR
Japan hosted the first World Shakuhachi Festival in 1994, which was followed four years
later by the second World Shakuhachi Festival held in Boulder, Colorado. And now,
preparations have begun for the fifth international shakuhachi convention to be held in
Sydney, Australia in 2008. In the United States in 1998, The Shakuhachi Summer Camp
of the Rockies established its annual appearance and soon after, in 2001, The East Coast
The shakuhachi has also enjoyed recognition among members of the international
flute community. Though the shakuhachi does not share its genealogy with the
transverse flute, it has been welcomed among flutists with its contributions to the 2005
2
National Flute Association Convention activities and related articles appearing in recent
editions of The Flutist Quarterly journal and Flute Talk magazine. Additionally,
advertisements for the shakuhachi have begun appearing regularly in The Flutist
Experimentation has even begun with physically combining the shakuhachi with the
The interest in the shakuhachi is far reaching in scope. People are seeking an
historical knowledge of the shakuhachi, the skill for crafting new instruments,
shakuhachi teachers, and new compositions and recordings that include the shakuhachi.
W
There has also been a wave of new compositions written for the transverse flute that are
IE
in some way influenced by the shakuhachi. Composers such as Elizabeth Brown, Kazuo
Fukushima, Shirish Korde, Wil Offermans, and Toru Takemitsu have used traditional
EV
shakuhachi repertoire, ideology, performance practice, or familiar shakuhachi gestures as
points of departure in creating contemporary compositions for the Western flute. In order
PR
compositions for solo flute, each composer devised their own system of notation, as a
standard set of notation for such gestures is not available. For instance, Frank Michael
uses a combination of traditional music notation and proportional notation together with
his own fingering system in his solo flute composition entitled Shakuhachi. Similarly,
Shirish Korde uses a mix of traditional music notation with proportional notation in his
1
Monty H. Levenson, “Tai Hei Shakuhachi: Japanese Bamboo Flutes,” The Flutist Quarterly 31, no. 3
(Spring 2006): 77. The first appearance of an advertisement for the shakuhachi in a flute related
publication.
2
Ibid. The Tai Hei Shakuhachi company is a maker of the shakulute, a shakuhachi headjoint for the silver
flute which fits the standard C or B foot, alto, and wood flutes, thus turning the transverse flute into a
vertically played instrument.
3
accomplishes the same thing through the use of alternate fingerings. A third and very
distinctive notation is found in Kazuo Fukushima’s piece, Shun-san. While the balance
of traditional notation to proportional notation is fairly even in both the Michael and
graphics he acquired from reading Bruno Bartolozzi’s monograph, New Sounds for
Woodwind.
W
While there is not an abundance of repertoire for unaccompanied flute written
IE
with the influence of the Japanese shakuhachi, the impact of the instrument on the
has traveled among composers. Shakuhachi influences in modern flute repertoire have
PR
been expressed by composers of Asian, German, Dutch, Indian, and American descent.
4
W
IE
To enable the deciphering of the non-traditional notation briefly described above,
as well as that found in the other works listed in Table 1, the performer should have a
EV
certain level of knowledge about Japanese musical culture and shakuhachi gestures.
repertoire influenced by the shakuhachi to this extent has not been available. To
facilitate analyzing the shakuhachi gestures found in the unaccompanied flute repertoire,
the tradition and performance practice of the shakuhachi will be explored first. This
information will then be applied to analyzing and deciphering the unique languages and
notation used, and the characteristic shakuhachi techniques or gestures intended, in the
following compositions: Frank Michael’s Shakuhachi Op. 38, No. 5; Shirish Korde’s
Tenderness of Cranes; and Kazuo Fukushima’s Shun-san. A formal and tonal analysis
for each piece as can be applied to such non-traditional twentieth-century works will be
included.
CHAPTER 2
THE SHAKUHACHI
History
imported member of the court orchestra from China. This instrument had six finger
holes, five on the front and one on the back for the thumb. Its tube was straight from end
to end and it ranged in length from about 44 centimeters for the standard sized instrument
with a lowest pitch near f ′ to 34 centimeters with a lowest pitch near a′. The Japanese
W
name for this import came from the standard length of the instrument; 44 centimeters was
IE
about 1 shaku plus 8 tenths of another, hachi, that when put together formed the name for
the instrument, shakuhachi. When the holes of the early shakuhachi were opened in
EV
succession, the result was a close approximation of a Western European major scale,
which was in line with Chinese modal practice. 3 Eight of these early instruments survive
from around the time it was dropped from the Japanese court orchestra in the tenth
century. Eventually, the shakuhachi died out of use, as well, and was never successfully
in literature and in use near the beginning of the sixteenth century, ultimately known as
3
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., s.v. “Japan,” 832.
4
Ibid. They are preserved in the Shōsōin, the eighth century imperial repository in Nara, Japan. A detailed
description of these flutes and their measurements can be found in the book Shōsōin no Gakki (Musical
Instruments in the Shōsōin), Shōsōin Office ed., Nihon Keizai Shimbun Sha, Tokyo, 1967.
5
William Malm, Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments, The New Edition (New York:
Kodansha International Ltd., 2000), 167.
6
the hitoyogiri. In the early to mid-sixteenth century, the hitoyogiri was associated mostly
with high ranking members of Japanese society such as Buddhist priests, bushi (persons
of samurai birth), and groups called komosō. The komosō were wandering beggar-priests
who were identified by their meager baggage, a straw mat and an instrument, a
hitoyogiri. 6
Hitoyogiri literally translates as ‘one-node cutting’, meaning there was only one
bamboo node in the whole length of the instrument. According to Riley Lee, “[s]ources
before the mid-17th century such as Taigenshô [a 1512 authoritative music encyclopedia]
W
and Tanteki hiden fu (短笛秘伝譜, Secretly transmitted scores for the short flute), written in
1608 and attributed to Ômori Sôkun (大森宗勲, 1570-1625) do not use the term hitoyogiri,
IE
even though the instruments being discussed are clearly made with a single node.” 7
Instead, the terms shakuhachi or ‘short flute’ are used for this one node version of the
EV
instrument. The term hitoyogiri no shakuhachi was first used among academia to
pieces] for Beginners for Strings and Bamboo), a teach-yourself book for hitoyogiri,
shamisen and koto written in 1664 by Nakamura Sôsan (中村宗三).” 8 The hitoyogiri had
only five very small finger holes, four on the front and one on the back for the thumb, and
a range of about an 11th due to its short length. Therefore, the challenges faced when
playing this instrument involved an extreme difficulty in altering pitches and their quality
6
Ibid.
7
Riley K. Lee, “Yearning for the Bell: A Study of Transmission in the Shakuhachi Honkyoku Tradition,”
(Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney, 1993); available from
http://www.rileylee.net/Thesis14Mar06%20Folder/chp3.html (18 of 56).
8
Ibid. The Sôsan book is the oldest Japanese publication of printed Japanese musical scores that includes
two kinds of repertoire: 1. vocal accompaniments and instrumental chamber ensemble pieces that include
the hitoyogiri, and 2. solo pieces for the hitoyogiri.
7
By the late seventeenth century a new religious community known as the Fuke
sect was organized by unemployed samurai who followed the Zen doctrine, which “aims
among this community was the shakuhachi which, in contrast to the hitoyogiri, was
longer, had a much thicker wall, a flared bottom end, and in time it became known as the
fuke-shakuhachi. The shape and structure of the new fuke-shakuhachi was a consequence
of using the strong root end of the bamboo. In addition, these developments are believed
W
to be the result of the instrument’s use as a defensive weapon by these former samurai
priests.
IE
At that point in Japanese history, country-wide travel was restricted. The ex-
EV
samurai turned to “the cover of religious asceticism to gain a government-approved
monopoly on the use of the shakuhachi in begging for alms, in exchange, apparently, for
serving as government spies.” 10 They were known as komusō (successors of the komosō
PR
from the sixteenth century), priests of emptiness and nothingness, and traveled freely,
wearing basket-like headgear that hid their faces to symbolize emptiness and their
removal from the vanity of the world. Though the hitoyogiri was still in use throughout
the seventeenth century, a solo repertoire developed simultaneously for the fuke-
shakuhachi, which was used mainly in meditation and by the wandering komusō.
Eventually the hitoyogiri was replaced by the fuke-shakuhachi by the end of the
9
Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1985), s.v. “Zen.”
10
Grove, s.v. “Japan,” 833.