Air-X Test Bench Report-Ek
Air-X Test Bench Report-Ek
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3
I. Introduction
The main objective of this project was to design, build, and test two small wind generator
test benches that could be used in electrical and mechanical engineering classes to promote
understanding of wind systems. One of the test benches was designed to be portable,
allowing it to be used for outreach events. The parts and materials for each bench cost
approximately $1000.
A. Wind Generator
The wind generator chosen for this project was the Southwest Windpower Air-X model, a
400 W system which is primarily used to charge batteries in off-grid settings. The
specifications for this system are shown in Figure 1. This system was chosen for its
convenient size and safe power levels, along with its general availability and low cost
(several hundred dollars). Although this system includes a circuit board for AC-DC
conversion and safe battery charging, the intended curricular uses for the test bench
involved the three-phase AC power produced directly from the permanent magnet
generator. The generator’s rated power output occurred at approximately 1700 rpm.
B. Driving Motors
The large test bench motor was expected to support the full range of the wind generator’s
rpm and power ratings. The Leeson 1 hp, 1750 rpm, AC electric motor was selected as a
good fit for these requirements. The motor’s specifications are provided in Figure 2. This
motor is powered through a standard outlet, with internal circuitry converting the single-
phase AC power into three phases.
For the smaller test bench, the required power rating was lowered as a compromise to
balance the higher cost of the more powerful motors. In addition, the outreach activities
did not require the full power rating. The motor selected for the smaller test bench was the
Groschopp 0.298 hp, 2350 rpm, DC electric motor, with specifications shown in Figure 3.
Figure 2. Motor used for large wind generator test bench (leeson.com).
Page |5
Figure 3. Motor used for portable wind generator test bench (groschopp.com).
C. Benches
The larger test bench had to support the weight of the wind generator and driving motor
and had to be easily moved between classrooms. Extra surface area was desirable for test
equipment, such as the oscilloscopes and load bank. A good compromise between these
requirements, durability, and cost was found in the bench shown in Figure 4.
Since the smaller test bench was intended for outreach along with the standard classroom
activities, it needed to be small, lightweight, and mobile. The final choice was the bench
shown in Figure 5, which was just big enough to fit the wind generator, driving motor, and
an oscilloscope. The top surface was found to be too frail and was therefore replaced by a
40” x 24” piece of sanded plywood. This top piece had to be cut more precisely to the
correct size and then coated in a polyurethane base wood finish to create a safe, durable
surface.
Page |6
Figure 4. Workbench used for large wind generator test bench (globalindustrial.com).
Figure 5. Workbench used for portable wind generator test bench (vistamation.com).
Page |7
The large test bench’s motor had a rigid mount already attached, so only a base plate and a
method to connect the generator needed to be designed. Since the motor shaft already had
a keyway, the connecting device needed a keyway connection scheme. A direct helical shaft
coupler with a 5/16” hex-head attachment at the end was chosen to connect the motor and
generator (Figure 6). Figure 7 shows the fabricated hex-head adapter.
Figure 6. Helical shaft coupler used for the large test bench (heli-cal.com).
While designing and testing the generator mount, it was found that the tolerances in the
machined hex-head adapter and the Air-X rotor connection were not precise. To fix the
problem, the Air-X was mounted to an angle bracket using three bolts which were designed
to hold the front faceplate containing the rotor to the housing. This allowed the face to
remain normal to the shaft axis. This also decreased the component’s weight and eased its
machining requirements. Figure 8 shows the final wind generator mount.
The Air-X mounting bracket was designed to sit in slots to allow for greater adjustability. A
base plate was therefore needed with the desired slots and mounting points. Figure 9
shows the base plate, and Figure 10 shows the combined large test bench assembly.
Detailed schematics for these fabricated components can be found in Appendix A, along
with assembly drawings.
The small test bench’s motor had no mount, so a base plate, a motor mount, and a method
to connect the motor to the generator were designed. The connection method was similar
to that used for the large test bench, with different dimensions as appropriate while still
allowing the wind generator to be swapped between the benches. This was made possible
because the height for the shaft in the small test bench was chosen to be the same height as
the large motor sitting on its stand. Figure 11 shows the fabricated hex-head adapter.
Specifications of the direct helical shaft coupler are shown in Figure 12. The generator
mount was the same as that for the large test bench, previously shown in Figure 8.
Figure 12. Helical shaft coupler used for the small test bench (heli-cal.com).
P a g e | 11
Next, the motor mounts were designed. Due to the awkward shape of the motor and its
mounting points, two large angle brackets were machined to fit the face extrusions on the
motor. This provided for a large amount of metal-to-metal contact while still allowing for
the small shaft of the motor to be used. Figure 13 shows the angle bracket.
Figure 13. Angle bracket used to mount the small test bench’s motor.
The base plate for the small test bench, which contained the desired slots and mounting
points, is shown in Figure 14. The complete mounting system for the small test bench is
shown in Figure 15. Appendix A contains detailed drawings of these components, along
with assembly drawings.
Figure 14. Base plate used for the small test bench.
P a g e | 12
Figure 15. Complete mounting system for the small test bench.
The following tools and equipment were used in fabricating some of the components listed
in the previous sections and attaching all components together.
Mill
Lathe
Horizontal or vertical band saw with a minimum of 8.5 inches by 4.5 inches of
allowable cutting to occur
Hand sander (preferably electric)
Hand drill that fits 3/8” drill bit and 1” or greater diameter hole cutter
3/8” drill bit and end mill
5/16” drill bit
1/4” drill bit
3/16” end mill
13/32” drill bit preferably but 7/16” will work as well
3/4” drill bit
3/8” diameter fill and flat file
1” or greater diameter hole cutter
Hexagon-a-diagonalizer (hexagonal collet) with collets to fit 1” diameter round
stock (a rotary table will do but will not be as accurate)
Milling mini jacks to support material while in vise
Polyurethane brushes
Sand paper ranging from course to fine grain
Set of Allen keys
Large rotary saw
Hand saw
P a g e | 13
Soldering iron
Solder
Wire cutters
Wire strippers
Table 1 lists the materials and hardware used in fabricating and connecting the workbench
components. Most of these parts were found at local hardware stores, and a few items were
obtained on-line at McMaster-Carr. Assembly instructions are included in Appendix A.
Table 1. Materials and hardware used in test bench fabrication and assembly.
The larger test bench has a 1 hp motor that uses three-phase power. The motor’s controller
converts the single phase AC signal from the wall outlet into the necessary three phases.
The controller does display a frequency in Hz, but this frequency does not represent the
motor’s rotational frequency - it represents the electrical frequency that is fed into the
motor. Therefore, an external rpm detection circuit is needed. Note that the controller can
also display the current, voltage, and power that are input to the motor. This data may be
used to calculate the efficiency of the entire system.
The parts used in the electrical control and rpm display for the large test bench are shown
in Table 2. The wiring diagram for connecting the controller to the motor is shown in
Figure 16, and a physical example of this wiring is shown in Figure 17, where the white
cable is connected to a wall outlet and the black cable is run to the motor. Figure 18
presents the wiring diagram for the rpm display, and Figure 19 shows an example
implementation of this circuit, where the axial capacitor is smoothing the input 9 Vdc
signal. A strong magnet is placed on the rotating shaft to trigger the Hall Effect sensor (see,
for example, Figure 23).
Figure 16. Electrical wiring diagram for the large test bench motor and controller.
Figure 18. Electrical wiring diagram for the large test bench rpm display.
Microcontroller
To Hall Effect
Sensor
Smoothing
Capacitor
Voltage
Regulators
From 9V
Adapter
Newhaven display
Figure 19. Example circuit used for the large test bench rpm display.
P a g e | 17
The motor controller for the small bench was designed to be user friendly and safe. This
was achieved by using a microcontroller to regulate the motor’s speed by adjusting the
pulse width (i.e., duty cycle) input to the motor driver, as seen in the electrical schematic in
Figure 20.
The microcontroller was a Texas Instruments MSP430. There are three inputs to this
controller: rpm, a speed-up button, and a slow-down button, as shown in Figure 21 and
Figure 22. The processor receives information from a Hall Effect sensor that toggles every
time a magnet passes the sensor as the motor shaft spins (see Figure 23). The processor
calculates an average from ten toggles and uses the average period to calculate an rpm
value. Based on the rpm set-point, the processor will either increase the duty cycle input to
the motor driver if the rpm is too low or decrease the duty cycle if the motor is spinning too
fast. There is also a second controller which calculates the rpm and outputs the value onto
a serial RS232 character display. The reason that the first controller is not handling both
functions is a lack of timers in the controller; there is only one timer on each controller, and
it is not capable of handling both jobs.
The power side of this project consists of running 120 Vac from a standard power outlet
into a transformer to get 24 Vac, as shown in Figure 24. When rectified, the voltage is
roughly 34 Vdc. A filter capacitor is used to reduce the ripple. The 34 Vdc power is fed into
the motor driver, which will take the 3.3 V output voltage of the microcontroller and
amplify it to 15 V to run the gates on the MOSFETs. The microcontroller will run the
MOSFETs and will change their duty cycle. This will control how much power is allowed
into the motor in order to regulate its speed.
The start and stall current of the motor is 66 Amps, and the peak current of the motor
driver is 75 Amps, but the motor will never start under full power. Under normal
operations the current should be no more than 14 Amps, and the motor driver is rated for
20 Amps of continuous current. The transformer will need to handle about 500 Watts at 24
Vac. The filter capacitor reduces the ripple from the rectified 24 Vac, which helps the
controller to provide constant power to the motor. If the motor is running at 12 Amps, the
voltage ripple is 5%.
The various electrical components used for the small test bench are listed in Table 3.
P a g e | 18
Figure 20. Electrical wiring diagram for the small test bench.
P a g e | 19
From 24 V
Supply Cable to MSP430 for
Pushbuttons Motor Driver
Pushbuttons with
102J Capacitors
Figure 23. Example installation of Hall Effect sensor on small motor shaft.
Two Sets of 24
Vdc Output Cables
Output from
Smoothing
Capacitor goes to Input Power from
Motor Switch / Standard 120 Vac
Circuit 60 Hz Outlet
Figure 24. Example power supply for the small test bench motor (housed inside bench).
P a g e | 21
When soldering the circuit together, make sure that the MSP430 is in a socket, as it will
need to be removed.
Programming Instructions
1. Install the Texas Instruments Code Composer Studio 4, using this link:
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Download_CCS
You will need to register the software with Texas Instruments before installation.
2. Go to File > New > CCS Project
a. Call your project either Motor Controller (for the large test bench) or LCD
Rpm (for either bench).
i. Click “Next” until you get to a screen called Project Setting.
ii. In the subsection “Device Variant” select the MSP430 that you are
programming (the MSP430f2013 for the motor controller or the
MSP430f2012 for the LCD display).
iii. Press finish.
6. Take the chip out and install it into the circuit board.
Once the materials have been obtained, manufacturing and assembly can begin. Basic
instructions for manufacturing and assembling the test benches are included below. If you
do not have access to a fabrication shop or are not proficient in the use of the machinery
necessary to complete these parts, take the mechanical schematics from Appendix A to a
certified machinist for fabrication.
Next, coat the butcher block in the polyurethane gloss finish using the polyester brushes.
Two thick coats should be enough to finish the butcher block for regular student use.
After the butcher block has finished drying, the legs can be screwed onto the butcher block.
The stiffening rear support can then be attached and the wheels can be added.
Once this is complete, do not reattach the work surface. The reason will become apparent
once the base plate is mounted. Another hole must be drilled into the main shelving panel
to allow the capacitor to be mounted. A much larger hole must also be drilled into the side
of the large storage area. This will serve as a hole for the electronics’ power cords to pass
through and attach to the power strip on the other side that will be adhesively stuck to the
outside (see Figure 25). Once these things have been completed, the capacitor, transformer,
and power strip can be mounted (see Figure 24 for the transformer configuration). The
transformer is mounted using a 5/16” x 3” hex head bolt and corresponding nylon nut. The
others are held in place by 5 min. epoxy. This would also be a good time to sand and finish
the handy panel. Two coats of the polyurethane are plenty for this application.
Figure 25. Power strip and cable run for small test bench.
P a g e | 24
Motor Mount
To assemble the motor and its motor mounts, use the eight 1/4” x 1.5” bolts and
corresponding nylon nuts to fasten them to each other through their corresponding holes.
Once the mount is in place, the generator’s angle bracket can be attached. Complete this
task just as you did before, except use four of the 3/8” x 1.25” carriage bolts and 3/8” wing
nuts. Once both mounts are secure, flip the assembly over.
The entire assembly can now be mounted to the work surface of the workstation. Begin by
placing the dried handy panel on top of the work surface so that the hole pattern in the
wood aligns itself with the hole configuration in the steel. Then perform the same task for
the base plate assembly. Using the four 3/8” x 2” hex-head bolts and four 3/8” nylon nuts,
fasten the base plate assembly, handy panel, and work surface to each other so that nothing
moves. This can be done by passing a bolt through the concentric hole patterns in each part
and tightening the nylon nut down to a tight fit.
Once these parts are secured to each other, they can be resecured to the storage sections of
the work bench.
Electrical Mounting
Once the bench has been assembled to a near finished state, the electrical components can
be attached. The electrical enclosure with the clear screen should be mounted first. Using
the four wood screws, screw the electrical box down through the mounting points near the
corners of the enclosure. The final test bench configurations are shown in Figure 26 and
Figure 27.
P a g e | 25
This section contains instructions on how to operate the small and large test benches.
Turn On
1. Plug the power strip into the wall.
2. Turn the power strip switch to the “on” position.
3. Check the LCD display; it should be glowing blue.
Turn Off
1. Press the red stop button till the motor comes to a stop.
2. Press the power strip button to turn it off.
3. Unplug the power strip from the wall.
Turn On
1. Plug the power strip into the wall.
2. Turn the power strip switch to the on position.
3. Check the LCD display; it should be glowing blue.
4. Turn the motor power switch on the display box.
Note: The response time of the PID controller is slow when the rpm is low.
P a g e | 27
Turn Off
1. Press and release the black button repeatedly, until the motor comes to a stop.
2. Turn the power off to the motor.
3. Press the power strip button to turn it off.
4. Unplug the power strip from the wall.
P a g e | 28
int count = 0;
int lastcount = 0;
int revolutions = 0;
float rpm = 0;
long Time = 0;
int To = 0;
int rev = 0;
long Timmer;
#include "msp430f2012.h"
__enable_interrupt();
#include <msp430f2013.h>
TimerPwm();
if (0x80 & P1IN){
buttondown = 1;
P a g e | 43
}
else{
buttondown = 0;
}
if (buttondown != lastbuttondown){
if (buttondown == 1){
TARGET = TARGET - 100;
_delay_cycles(8000000);
if (TARGET < 100){
TARGET = 100;
PWM = 0;
}
}
lastbuttondown = buttondown;
}
lastcount = count;
}
if (Time > 160000 && TARGET == 200) PWM = 400;
// motor controll using increments
if (revolutions >= 1) {
rpm = constant/Time;
rpm = rpm * 3;
revolutions = 0;
Time = 0;
if (rpm > TARGET){
PWM = PWM - 1;
}
This section explains the structural analysis performed for this project.
A. Mechanical
To verify the design and materials chosen for the Air-X test benches, an analysis was
conducted to demonstrate that nothing in the test bench would fail structurally in a worst-
case scenario. The analysis was performed with the SolidWorks Simulation finite element
software, and the von Mises failure criteria were used to check for any yielding that may
occur. It is also important to note that no analysis was performed on any fixtures such as
the base plate, bolts, screws, or adhesive due to their high yield strength and/or lack of
excessive loading applied to them.
1. Helical Couplers
The connection point between the motor and the Air-X generator undergoes cyclic loading
due not only to the coupler and the shaft being misaligned but also because of the load that
is transferred through the system. Each coupler is designed to handle the expected torque
and misalignment; however, analysis was still completed to verify that the connections
between the machined parts and the coupler would not fail in extreme cases. Below are the
calculations and analysis performed for this particular area.
when its leads are shorted, it will not come to a complete stop. This means that the worst-
case scenario - with the generator coming to a sudden and complete stop - has essentially
no chance of happening. This hypothesis was tested multiple times and yet no failure
occurred. The simulation of the stress on the set screw hex-head adapter is shown in Figure
28.
Figure 28. Stress on the small test bench set screw adapter, maximum dynamic torque.
Figure 29. Stress on the large test bench hex-head adapter, maximum dynamic torque.
To analyze the Groschopp motor mount, a factor of safety of two was applied to the
maximum stall torque possible (80 lb-in.) and then this loading was applied multiple times
to the angle bracket. The first loading case was applying the chosen torque to all of the
motor mounting points. This would simulate a best case scenario if the motor applied this
kind of torque. Figure 30 shows the resulting stresses present in the motor mount.
P a g e | 49
Figure 30. Stresses in small test bench motor mount under stall torque loading conditions
applied to all mounting points.
This motor mount is made of 6061 - T6 multipurpose aluminum alloy. Its yielding strength
is ~35,000 psi. However, with the current loading applied to it, the maximum stress
reached in the material is 222.3 psi. Therefore, the angle bracket can handle more than
twice the stall torque when the load is distributed between the four mounting points.
Another study was conducted to see if the motor mount would fail when all the above
discussed loading was put on one mounting point. Figure 31 shows those results. Even with
the increase in loading at a single point, the maximum stress present in the angle bracket is
far less than the yielding point of the material.
P a g e | 50
Figure 31. Stresses in Groschopp motor mount under stall torque loading conditions
applied to one mounting point.
To analyze the generator’s mount, the same procedure performed for Groschopp motor
mount was used. First, twice the maximum stall torque (160 lb-in.) was applied to all of the
mounting points for the Air-X generator. Figure 32 shows the result. As with the motor
mount, this loading failed to cause any stress values above the yield limit of the material.
Once no yielding was found in the perfect loading case, an anti-symmetric load was applied
as it was for the motor mount. Figure 33 shows these results. Again, the material did not
yield and therefore, it can be stated that the generator mount will not fail structurally while
the test bench is use.
P a g e | 51
Figure 32. Air-X generator mount under Groschopp stall torque loading conditions applied
to all mounting points.
P a g e | 52
Figure 33. Air-X generator mount under Groschopp stall torque loading conditions applied
to one mounting point.
The large test bench is very similar to the small test bench except the motor already has a
built in mount. Therefore, only the angle bracket for the Air-X generator needed to be
analyzed. The bracket was made of the same material as the angle bracket used in the small
test bench and therefore had the same material properties.
To analyze the effects that the additional strength of Leeson motor had on the angle
bracket, a factor of safety of 2 was applied to the maximum stall torque possible (168 lb-in.)
and then this loading was applied multiple times to the angle bracket. The first loading case
was applying the chosen torque to all of the motor mounts. This would simulate a best case
scenario if the motor applied this kind of torque. Figure 34 shows the stresses present in
the angle bracket under symmetric loading about the shaft center. The analysis once again
indicated absolutely no failure in the bracket.
P a g e | 53
Figure 34. Air-X generator mount under Leeson stall torque loading conditions applied to
all mounting points.
Anti-symmetric loading was then applied to the angle bracket. Figure 35 shows the stresses
present in the angle bracket under this loading. Once again, no failure occurred.
P a g e | 54
Figure 35. Air-X generator mount under Leeson stall torque loading conditions applied to
one mounting point.