0% found this document useful (0 votes)
372 views4 pages

CyberRatings Malware 2022 Report PDF

Uploaded by

labkesair
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
372 views4 pages

CyberRatings Malware 2022 Report PDF

Uploaded by

labkesair
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

WEB BROWSER COMPARATIVE TEST REPORT: MALWARE PROTECTION

Q2 2022 Google Chrome | Microsoft Edge| Mozilla Firefox


During Q2, 2022, CyberRatings.org performed an
independent test of malware protection offered by
popular web browsers running on Windows 10 & 11. The Google Chrome 88.4%
tests ran for 24 days with 96 discrete test runs. To
Overview

protect against malware, Microsoft Edge uses Microsoft


Defender SmartScreen; Google Chrome and Mozilla Microsoft Edge 97.0%
Firefox use the Google Safe Browsing API.

Microsoft Edge offered the most protection, blocking


97.0% of malware. Google Chrome provided the second- Mozilla Firefox 84.6%
highest protection, blocking an average of 88.4%,
followed by Mozilla Firefox at 84.6%. Block Rate

The ability to warn potential victims that they are about to stray onto a malicious website puts web browsers in a unique
position to combat malware. Websites that trick (socially engineer) users to download malware have short lifespans, so it is
essential that the site is discovered and added to the reputation system as quickly as possible. This explains the relationship
between average-time-to-block and catch-rate.
Average Time to Block on Windows 10 & 11
We measured each browser’s ability to block malware
as quickly as we found them on the Internet. This
continued every six hours to determine how long it
would take a vendor to add protection. The average
time each browser took to block malware once the
threat was introduced into the test cycle was then
calculated and recorded.
Malware Block Rate Over Time
Summary of Results

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%
Google Chrome Microsoft Edge Mozilla Firefox
20%

10%

0%

Attackers’ malware campaigns are constantly changing, with the bulk of new attacks occurring in the first few hours after
an attack is launched. URL reputation systems shorten the time attackers have to achieve their goals by preventing/warning
users that a URL is a known malware site. Similarly, file reputation systems alert users that a file is known to be malware.

© 2022 CyberRatings.org. All rights reserved. 1


WEB BROWSER COMPARATIVE TEST REPORT: MALWARE PROTECTION

Each browser’s individual block performance was measured continuously. A browser’s overall block rate is calculated as the number of
successful blocks divided by the total number of test cases. For example, with tests conducted every 6 hours, a URL that was online for
48 hours will be tested eight (8) times. A browser blocking it on 6 (out of a maximum 8) test runs will achieve a block rate of 75%.

Malware Protection Over Time on Windows 10

100%

90%

80%

70%
Google Chrome 88.3%
60%

50%
Microsoft Edge 96.5%

40%

30% Mozilla Firefox 84.6%

20%
Block Rate

10%
Google Chrome Microsoft Edge Mozilla Firefox

0%

Malware Protection Over Time on Windows 11

100%

90%

80%

70%
Google Chrome 88.5%
60%

50%
Microsoft Edge 97.5%

40%

30% Mozilla Firefox 84.5%

20%
Block Rate

10%
Google Chrome Microsoft Edge Mozilla Firefox
0%

© 2022 CyberRatings.org. All rights reserved. 2


WEB BROWSER COMPARATIVE TEST REPORT: MALWARE PROTECTION
MALWARE PROTECTION 2020

Total Number of Malicious Samples Tested


Malware Attacks
28,506 raw, unvalidated samples were tested multiple times
Social engineered malware (SEM) attacks use deceptions to
with each web browser, over a total of 96 test cycles each,
trick users into downloading malware: Hijacked email and
conducted without interruption over 576 hours (every 6 hours
social media accounts take advantage of the implicit trust
for 24 days). Our engineers removed samples that did not pass
between contacts and deceive victims into believing that links
the validation criteria, including those tainted by exploits (not
to malicious files are trustworthy. Other deceptions include
part of this test). Ultimately, 903 unique, valid malware
pop-up messages advising users that applications (such as
samples were included in the final set of 120,450 discrete,
Adobe Flash Player) need to be installed or warn that a user’s
valid malware tests (20,075 tests per web browser), providing
computer is infected, or that it requires an update.
a margin of error of less than 0.91 percent (0.91%) at a
Once malware is installed, victims are vulnerable to credential confidence level of 99%.
theft, identity theft, bank account compromise, etc.
How We Tested – Malware Samples
Web Browsers Protection Against Malware
Data in this report spans a testing period of twenty (20) days
To protect against malware, cloud-based reputation systems between May 28 and June 20, 2022. During the test,
scour the Internet for malicious websites and then categorize CyberRatings engineers routinely monitored connectivity to
content accordingly. Web browsers then ask the cloud-based
ensure the browsers under test could access the malware as
reputation systems about specific URLs, files, or applications. well as the reputation services in the cloud.
If results indicate that malware is present, the web browser
The emphasis was on freshness with new samples constantly
redirects the user to a warning message explaining that the
being added to the test and dead samples removed.
URL, file, or application is malicious. Some reputation systems
also include additional educational content. How We Assessed Results
Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox use the Google Safe
We measured each browser’s ability to block malware as
Browsing API for both URL reputation and application
quickly as they were discovered on the Internet. Engineers
reputation for blocking malicious files. Microsoft Edge uses
repeated these tests every six hours to determine how long it
Microsoft Defender SmartScreen, which provides protection
would take a vendor to add protection if they did at all.
from attacks via a cloud-based reputation service for URL
Each browser’s performance was measured continuously, and
reputation, as well as application reputation for malicious file
the overall block rate of all malware samples tested with the
blocking.
browser was recorded. Each browser’s overall block rate was
Average Number of Malicious Malware Samples Added Per Day calculated as the number of successful blocks divided by the
total number of test cases. For example, with tests conducted
On average, 41 new validated malware samples were added
every 6 hours, a malware sample that was online for 48 hours
to the test set per day; numbers varied on some days as
was tested eight (8) times. A browser blocking it on 6 (out of a
criminal activity levels fluctuated.
maximum of 8) test runs achieved a block rate of 75%.

Test Environment Tested Products

• Microsoft Windows 10 Pro, 21H1 (OS Build 19044.1766) • Google Chrome: Version 100.0.4951.67 - 102.0.5005.285
• Microsoft Windows 11 Pro 21H1 (OS Build 22000.739) • Microsoft Edge: Version: 101.0.1210.47- 102.0.1245.44
• Mozilla Firefox: Version 100.0.1 - 101.0.1

© 2022 CyberRatings.org. All rights reserved. 3


WEB BROWSER COMPARATIVE TEST REPORT: MALWARE PROTECTION

Authors
Thomas Skybakmoen, Vikram Phatak

Test Methodology
CyberRatings Web Browser Security Test Methodology v1.0 is available at www.cyberratings.org

Contact Information
CyberRatings.org
2303 Ranch Road 620 South
Suite 160, #501
Austin, TX 78734

[email protected]
www.cyberratings.org

© 2022 CyberRatings.org. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied/scanned, stored on a retrieval system,
emailed or otherwise disseminated or transmitted without the express written consent of CyberRatings.org. (“us” or “we”).
1. The information in this report is subject to change by us without notice, and we disclaim any obligation to update it.
2. The information in this report is believed by us to be accurate and reliable at the time of publication, but is not guaranteed. All use of and
reliance on this report are at your sole risk. We are not liable or responsible for any damages, losses, or expenses of any nature whatsoever
arising from any error or omission in this report.
3. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ARE GIVEN BY US. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT, ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED AND EXCLUDED BY US. IN NO
EVENT SHALL WE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR INDIRECT DAMAGES, OR FOR ANY LOSS
OF PROFIT, REVENUE, DATA, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, OR OTHER ASSETS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF.
4. This report does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or guarantee of any of the products (hardware or software) tested or the
hardware and/or software used in testing the products. The testing does not guarantee that there are no errors or defects in the products or
that the products will meet your expectations, requirements, needs, or specifications, or that they will operate without interruption.
5. This report does not imply any endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or verification by or with any organizations mentioned in this report.
6. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names used in this report are the trademarks, service marks, and trade names of their respective
owners.

© 2022 CyberRatings.org. All rights reserved. 4

You might also like