Unrated SY 2022-2023 Highly Proficient Teacher IPCRF
Unrated SY 2022-2023 Highly Proficient Teacher IPCRF
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CABANATUAN CITY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications (For Senior High School Teachers, please refer to: DO 3, s. 2016; DO 27, s. 2016; and DO 51, s. 2017)
Position Title Master Teacher I Master Teacher II Master Teacher III Master Teacher IV
Education For Elementary School – Bachelor of For Elementary School - Bachelor of Completion of academic Completion of academic
Elementary Education (BEEd) or Elementary Education (BEEd) or requirements for a Master’s requirements for a Master’s
Bachelor’s degree plus 18 professional units Bachelor’s degree plus 18 professional degree in Education or its equivalent degree in Education or its
in Education; and 18 units for a units in Education; equivalent
Master’s degree in Education and 24 units for a Master’s
or its equivalent degree in Education or its equivalent
For Secondary School - For Secondary School - Bachelor of Completion of academic Completion of academic
Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) or Secondary Education (BSEd) or requirements for a Master’s degree in requirements for a Master’s
Bachelor’s degree plus 18 professional units Bachelor’s degree plus 18 professional Education or its degree in Education or its
in Education with appropriate major; and 18 units in Education; equivalent equivalent
units for a Master’s degree in Education or and 24 units for a Master’s
its equivalent degree in Education or its equivalent
Experience 3 years relevant experience 1 year as Master Teacher I or 1 year as Master Teacher II or 1 year as Master Teacher III or
4 years as Teacher III 5 years as Teacher III 5 years as Teacher III
Eligibility RA 1080 RA 1080 RA 1080 RA 1080
Trainings None Required 4 hours relevant training 8 hours of relevant training 16 hours of relevant training
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education Master’s Degree Graduate
Experience 3 years in service as Teacher III
Eligibility Licensure Examination for Teachers
Trainings Relevant Trainings
TO BE FILLED IN
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING DURING
EVALUATION
MF TIMELI WEI PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) SC
KRAs OBJECTIVES ACTUAL RESULTS
Os NE GHT OR
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met but No acceptable
within the allotted instruction exceeded evidence was
time the allotted time shown
Timeliness
(7.00%)
Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated
5. Exhibited effective Level 8 in Level 7 in Level 6 in 5 in Level 4 in Objective
and constructive Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown 5 as shown in COT
behavior management COT rating sheets / in COT rating sheets / COT rating sheets / in COT rating sheets /
rating sheets / inter-
skills by applying inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
positive and non-violent agreement forms observer agreement
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
discipline to ensure forms
learning- focused
environments. (PPST or
2.6.3)
(7.00%) No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was No acceptable
within the allotted met but evidence was
time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
6. Worked with Level 8 in Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Objective
colleagues to share Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown 6 as shown in COT
differentiated, COT rating sheets / in COT rating sheets / COT rating sheets / in COT rating sheets /
rating sheets / inter-
developmentally inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
agreement forms observer agreement
appropriate agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
opportunities to address forms
learners’ differences in
gender, needs, or
strengths, interests and
experiences. (PPST No acceptable
3.1.3) evidence was
shown
(7.00%) Efficiency Objective was met Objective was No acceptable
within the allotted met but evidence was
time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
3. Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated
Curriculum 7. Developed and Level 8 in Level 7 in Level 6 in 5 in Level 4 in Objective
and applied effective Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown 7 as shown in COT
Planning strategies in the COT rating sheets / in COT rating sheets / COT rating sheets / in COT rating sheets /
rating sheets / inter-
planning and inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
management of agreement forms observer agreement
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
developmentally forms
sequenced teaching
and learning process to or
meet curriculum 21.0
requirements and %
No acceptable
varied teaching evidence was
contexts. shown
(PPST 4.1.3) Efficiency Objective was met Objective was No acceptable
development and use of use of appropriate use of teaching and / other collegial
appropriate teaching teaching and appropriate learning discussions on the
and learning resources, learning teaching and resources, selection,
including ICT, to resources, learning including ICT, to organization,
address specific learning including ICT, to resources, address specific development and use
goals. (PPST 4.5.3) address specific including ICT, to learning goals of appropriate
learning goals, address specific during coaching and teaching and learning
(7.00%) during coaching and learning goals, mentoring resources, including
mentoring sessions/ during coaching sessions/ ICT, to address
meetings/LAC and mentoring meetings/LAC specific learning
sessions / FGDs / sessions/ sessions / FGDs / goals, as shown in
other collegial meetings/LAC other collegial MOV 1
discussions, as sessions / FGDs / discussions, as
shown in MOV 4 other collegial shown in MOV 2
discussions, as
shown in MOV 3
Efficiency
Timeliness Advised and Advised and Advised and Advised and guided No acceptable
guided guided guided colleagues in only 1 evidence was
colleagues colleagues colleagues quarter shown
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
4. Quality Guided Synthesized Conducted coaching Planned for the No acceptable
Assessment 10. Worked 21.0 colleagues in discussions with and mentoring conduct of coaching evidence was
and collaboratively with % planning for the colleagues on the sessions/ and mentoring shown
Reporting colleagues to review the review of the design, selection, meetings/LAC sessions/
design, selection, design, selection, organization and sessions / FGDs / other meetings/LAC
organization and use of a organization and use use of a range of collegial discussions to sessions / FGDs /
range of effective of a range of effective review the design, other collegial
diagnostic, formative effective diagnostic, selection, organization discussions to review
and summative diagnostic, formative and and use of a range of the design, selection,
assessment strategies formative and summative effective diagnostic, organization and use
consistent with summative assessment formative and of a range of
curriculum assessment strategies summative effective diagnostic,
requirements. (PPST strategies consistent with assessment strategies formative and
5.1.3) consistent with curriculum consistent with summative
curriculum requirements, curriculum assessment
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating
The overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall within the following Competencies shall be monitored for developmental purposes. In evaluating the individual’s
adjectival ratings and shall be in three (3) decimal points. demonstration of Competencies, this rating scale shall apply.
1. A Grievance Commitee shall be created in each level of the organization to act as appeals board and final arbiter of all issues relating to the implementation of RPMS.
2. The Office performance assessment as discussed in the performance review and evaluation phase shall be final and not appealable. Any issue/appeal on the initial performance assessment of an office shall be
discussed and decided during the performance review conference.
3, Individual employees who feel aggrieved or dissatisfied with their final performance ratings can file an appeal with the Grievance Committee at their level within ten (10) working days from date of receipt of
notice of their final performance evaluation rating from the rater. The ratee, however, shall not be allowed to protest the performance ratings of co-employees. Ratings obtained by the ratee can only be used as basis
for reference for comparison in appealing the individual performance rating.
4. The Grievance Committee shall decide on the appeals within one (1) month from receipt. Appeals lodged at any Grievance Committee shall follow the hierarchical jurisdiction of various Grievance Committees
within the agency. For example, the decision of the Division Grievance Committee is appealable to the Regional Grievance Committee, which decision is in turn appealable to the Central Office Grievance
Committee.
Signature Signature
Date Date
Feedback:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________