Paper Group 2 - Inter Comm
Paper Group 2 - Inter Comm
Writer by Group 2 :
Clara Yuniarti (321910039)
Endar Joko Wicaksono (321910052)
Jesy Cristianti (321910074)
Herlin Firman Putri (321910067)
Margarita Norianti (321910094)
Class : B Afternoon
i
FOREWORD
Praise and gratitude we pray to the presence of God Almighty who has given His grace so
that the author can complete this paper entitled " Cross-Cultural Conflict and Adjustment”.
This paper provides an explanation Identify and Justify Ways to Cope with the Cross Cultural
Conflict in a New Culture, Explain the W- shaped Diagram of Adjustment Process in a New
Culture, Explain the Re- Entry Adjustment Process, Analyze Why Ethnocentrism is not
Recommended to be Developed.
The author realizes that there are shortcomings in this paper. Therefore, suggestions and
criticisms are always expected for the improvement of the author's work. The author also
hopes that this paper can provide more knowledge for all of us.
Pontianak,
Writers
ii
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER ..............................................................................................................................
FOREWORD.....................................................................................................................
CONTENT.........................................................................................................................
CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY.........................................................................................
A. Background .............................................................................................................
B. Purpose Of the Problem...........................................................................................
CHAPTER II DISCUSSION............................................................................................
A. Ways to Cope with the Cross Cultural Conflict in a New Culture
B. The W- shaped Diagram of Adjustment Process in a New Culture
C. Re- Entry Adjustment Process
D. Ethnocentrism
CHAPTER III CONCLUSION........................................................................................
REFERENCE.....................................................................................................................
iii
BAB I
PRELIMINARY
A. Background
Intercultural communication is a discipline that studies communication across
cultures and different social groups, or how culture influences communication. It
describes the various processes and communication problems that naturally arise in
an organization or social context consisting of individuals from different religious,
social, ethnic and educational backgrounds. In this sense, it seeks to understand how
people from different countries and cultures act, communicate and perceive the
world around them. Intercultural communication focuses on recognizing and
respecting those with cultural differences. The goal is mutual adaptation between
two or more different cultures leading to biculturalism/multiculturalism rather than
complete assimilation. It promotes the development of cultural sensitivity and
enables empathic understanding across different cultures.
Intercultural communication is the idea of knowing how to communicate within
different parts of the world. By understanding the theories, people are able to
understand how certain norms are prevalent in adapting to new cultures.
Intercultural communication uses theories within groups of people to achieve a sense
of cultural diversity. This is in the hopes of people being able to learn new things
from different cultures. The theories used give people an enhanced perspective on
when it is appropriate to act in situations without disrespecting the people within
these cultures; it also enhances their perspective on achieving cultural diversity
through the ideas of intercultural communication.
4
allow an individual or an organization to perform successfully in cross-cultural
situations.
Identity and culture are also studied within the discipline of communication to
analyze how globalization influences ways of thinking, beliefs, values, and identity
within and between cultural environments. Intercultural communication scholars
approach theory with a dynamic outlook and do not believe culture can be measured
nor that cultures share universal attributes. Scholars acknowledge that culture and
communication shift along with societal changes and theories should consider the
constant shifting and nuances of society.
The study of intercultural communication requires intercultural understanding.
Intercultural understanding is the ability to understand and value cultural
differences. Language is an example of an important cultural component that is
linked to intercultural understanding.
B. Purpose Of the Problem
a. Identify and Justify Ways to Cope with the Cross Cultural Conflict in a New
Culture
b. Explain the W- shaped Diagram of Adjustment Process in a New Culture
c. Explain the Re- Entry Adjustment Process
d. Analyze Why Ethnocentrism is not Recommended to be Developed
5
BAB II
DISCUSSION
7
themselves in their new environment. The adjustment period may be
accompanied by dramatic manifestations of symptoms such as anxiety,
headaches, digestive problems, and sleep disorders, or may bring less severe
symptoms such as discomfort and a more volatile temperament.
Research shows that most people who sojourn outside their home culture
experience cultural adjustment in similar ways which, when charted, have come
to be known as The U Curve of Cultural Adaptation. It is called a "U Curve"
because people generally start at a high point, then experience a decline, or
depression, before a leveling off period, then go through a critical "recovery"
stage and end up more or less balanced, where they began.
The following "W" shaped diagram illustrates periods of adjustment in a
new culture and might apply to a one-year stay (approximately) in a foreign
culture. Although the stages in the cycle do not always occur in the same order
and some stages may be skipped, the following pattern is a common one:
9
country, there is generally a great deal of excitement. There
are parties to welcome back the visitor and renewed
friendships to look forward to.
4. Re-entry shock.
Family and friends may not understand or appreciate what
the traveler has experienced. The native country or city may
have changed in the eyes of the former traveler.
5. Re-integration.
The former traveler becomes fully involved with friends,
family, and activities and feels once again integrated in the
society. Many people at this stage realize the positive and
negative aspects of both countries and have a more
balanced perspective about their experiences.
Individual Reactions
Individuals experience the stages of adjustment and re-entry in
different ways. When visitors have close relatives in the new
culture or speak the foreign language fluently, they may not
experience all the effects of culture shock or mental isolation.
An exile or refugee would 5 adjust differently from someone
who voluntarily traveled to a new coun- try. Certain individuals
have difficulties adapting to a new environment and perhaps
never do; others seem to adjust well from the very beginning of
their stay. Day-to-day living in another culture is undoubtedly an
educational experience. While traveling, and living abroad
people learn second languages, observe different customs, and
encounter new values. Many people who have lived in other
countries feel that exposure to foreign 5 cultures enables them
to gain insight into their own society. When facing different
values, beliefs, and behavior, they develop a deeper under-
standing of themselves and of the society that helped to
shape their characters. The striking contrasts of a second culture
provide a mirror in which one's own culture is reflected.
D. Ethnocentrism
Ethnocentrism is judging other people's culture from the perspective of our own
culture. Certain groups are considered wrong by other different groups, because
they view the wrong group according to the measure of truth that exists in their
own culture. As a result, the action is socially punishing and gives a 'wrong label'
claim to other people's cultures. Ethnocentrism is not always wrong because there
is an awareness of respect and a positive attitude towards one's own culture. But
on the other hand, ethnocentrism can provide a negative assessment of other
people's cultures. The wrong conclusion from cultural ethnocentrism thus
preventing an individual from interacting with other individuals/groups of
different cultures.
1
According to Summer in Alo Liweri as quoted by Kohar12, in ethnocentrism,
humans are basically individualistic and self-serving which in turn gives birth to
an antagonistic culture. Any highly ethnocentric group often absolutes rules.
Rules, ethics, and culture are considered the most valuable. In line with that,
James W. Neulip in his book Intercultural Communication; A Contextual
Approach explains that ethnocentric understanding can eventually lead to certain
consequences for other people. On that basis, there are three aspects that are
closely related to ethnocentrism.
a) Every society has a number of characteristics of social life that can be
hypothesized as a syndrome.
b) Ethnocentrism syndromes are functionally related to the composition and
existence of groups as well as competition between groups, so that the
greater the ethnocentrism of a group, the greater the solidarity of the
group.
c) There is a generalization that all groups show the syndrome.
The actualization of the syndrome appears in the form of a safe intra-group (in-
group) and disdain for the outside group (out-group). This is what is called the
ethnocentrism continuum. From the Neulip concept as before, it can be
understood that cultural ethnocentrism originates from high royalty towards group
culture. He thinks that his culture contains good values, so he acts according to the
correctness of his culture and considers other cultures to be wrong. Cultural
loyalty (worthiness) grows strongly from education and social experience both in
direct contact and obtained from stereotypes passed down from generation to
generation.
From the explanation above, it can be concluded why ethnocentrism is not
recommended to be developed because it can cause bad impacts, namely:
1. Causing horizontal conflict.
Being proud of one's own culture and looking down on other cultures can
trigger conflict among fellow citizens. Especially if the understanding of
ethnocentrism is not only attached to an individual.
2. Inhibits integration
Ethnocentrism can hinder the growth of cultural integration. In fact, these
various cultures can complement each other so that no meaningful conflict
is created.
3. Reducing the objectivity of science
Ethnocentrism can reduce the development of science. Because, an
individual will prioritize the side of subjectivity compared to objectivity in
assessing something.
2
BAB III
CLOSING
A. CONCLUSION
3
REFERENCE
Aneas, Maria Assumpta; Sandín, María Paz (2009-01-28). "Intercultural and Cross-Cultural
Communication Research: Some Reflections about Culture and Qualitative
Methods". Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
Liu, S., Volcic, Z., & Gallois, C. (2014). Introducing intercultural communication: Global cultures and
contexts. Sage.
Jandt, F. E. (Ed.). (2004). Intercultural communication: A global reader. Sage.
Hudiyanti, D., Raharjo, T. J., Narsito, N., & Noegrohati, S. (2015). Study on leakage of sesame
(Sesamum indicum L.) and coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) liposomes. Oriental Journal of
Chemistry, 31(1), 435.
https://study.com/learn/lesson/cultural-conflict-examples-theory.html
Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical
anthropology, (4), 177-182.
Kagan, H., & Cohen, J. (1990). Cultural adjustment of international students. Psychological
Science, 1(2), 133-137.
Xu, Y. (2020). Introducing language and intercultural communication: by Jane Jackson,
London and New York, Routledge, 2020, 402 pp.,£ 32.99 (Paperback)/£ 110.00
(Hardback), ISBN 9781138481619 (Paperback)/ISBN 9781138482012 (Hardback).