Alves Et Al 2002 - Os - Isotope - Arc - Volcanism - C
Alves Et Al 2002 - Os - Isotope - Arc - Volcanism - C
www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl
Abstract
   Os isotope ratios and Os and Re concentrations were measured in 56 lavas coming from 10 different subduction
zones. Samples span a large range of major element concentrations (from basalts to dacites) and Mg# (from 0.32 to
0.81). The 10 subduction zones, namely the Lesser Antilles, Java, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Izu^Bonin,
Kamchatka, the Aleutians, Mexico, Colombia and Peru^Chile, have a range of geodynamic settings. Measured 187 Os/
188
    Os ratios range from 0.130 to 1.524 and Os concentrations range from 0.05 to 46 ppt. Re concentrations range
from 24 to 915 ppt. Os initial isotope ratios are systematically positively and linearly correlated with the inverse of Os
concentrations in arc lavas from a given volcano, indicating that the Os isotopic compositions always reflect a binary
mixing process. Similar mixing relationships are also seen at the sample scale. All trends converge towards
unradiogenic compositions similar to those of upper mantle peridotites. These mixing relationships might be ascribed
to a general contamination process; however, a single shallow-level process of crustal assimilation is hardly reconciled
with the diversity of basements (from oceanic crust to continental crust compositions) of the selected arc volcanoes,
the occurrence of the mixing lines for both primary and differentiated samples, and the absence of covariations
between Os contents, isotope ratios, and indices of contamination and differentiation. On the other hand, because
subducted components are very radiogenic and differ from one zone to another, the radiogenic components may be
explained by varying amounts and natures of oceanic crust and sediments in the source of arc lavas. However, this
explanation implies two disequilibrium processes, first during magma formation in order to produce heterogeneous
lavas, and second during magma ascent to the surface to preserve slab signatures. ß 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All
rights reserved.
Keywords: subduction; lava; osmium; crust; recycling; mixing; rhenium; isotope ratios
  * Corresponding author. Present address: Pheasant Memorial Laboratory, Institute for Study of the Earth’s Interior, Okayama
University at Misasa, Misasa, Tottori-Ken 682-0193, Japan. Tel.: +81-858-43-3826; Fax: +81-858-43-3795.
  E-mail addresses: [email protected] (S. Alves), [email protected] (P. Schiano),
[email protected] (F. Capmas), [email protected] (C.J. Alle'gre).
  1
    Present address: Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Universite¤ Blaise-Pascal, 5 rue Kessler, 63038 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex,
France.
0012-821X / 02 / $ ^ see front matter ß 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 1 2 - 8 2 1 X ( 0 2 ) 0 0 5 2 4 - 1
Table 1
Geophysical characteristics of the 10 subduction zones
Subduction zone                      Convergence Age of         Sediment thickness Basement          Crustal basement
                                     ratea       AOCb           on the AOCc        thicknesse        geochemical naturef
                                     (cm/yr)     (Ma)           (m)                (km)
Lesser Antilles: North/South         1.4          86/100^150    235/1750            25/30^35         Oceanic
Java                                 7.6^7.9      138           300                 25^30            Ma¢c/ultrama¢c
                                                                                                     rocks+Sedimentsg
Papua New Guinea                     9^14         50            1500d               30               Oceanic
Philippines                          9            50            120                 ^                Transitional
Izu^Bonin (oceanic arc/Fuji)         9.6^6.7      146           600                 15^18/30         Oceanic/continentalh
Kamchatka                            8.9^9.2      90            364                 25^45            Accreted arc terranes
                                                                                                     +obducted oceanic crusti
Aleutians                            8.7^7.0      54            350                 18^25            Oceanic
Mexico                               5.7^8.5      15            170                 30               Continental
Colombia                             8.9^8.4      15            270                 66               Continental
Peru^Chile                           10.3^10.8    26^82         125                 40^70            Continental
a
     [34], except for Papua New Guinea [35] and Philippines [36].
b
     AOC: altered oceanic crust [37], except for Lesser Antilles [38].
c
    [36].
d
     [39].
e
    [34], except for Papua New Guinea [40] and for Northern Lesser Antilles [30].
f
    [37] unless speci¢ed.
g
     [41].
h
     [42].
i
    [43].
undi¡erentiated to slightly di¡erentiated basalts                       0.078 pg. The blank average contribution for Re
and andesites, whereas most of the rocks from                           was less than 20 pg. A total of 39 blank measure-
Izu^Bonin (49^66 wt% SiO2 , Mg# 0.39^0.63)                              ments were performed during the period of the
and the Aleutians (46^61 wt% SiO2 , Mg# 0.35^                           study, which corresponds to one blank measure-
0.54) are di¡erentiated with basaltic to dacitic                        ment for every three sample analyses. Analyses
compositions (cf. Table 2).                                             were performed by negative ion thermal ioniza-
                                                                        tion mass spectrometry on a Finnigan Mat 262
                                                                        at IPG-Paris. Twenty-three runs of the laboratory
3. Analytical techniques and results                                    standard solution diluted at various Os concentra-
                                                                        tions (loads of 0.5^10 pg) were performed
   Os and Re were extracted using the chemical                          throughout the study period. The mean 187 Os/
                                                                        188
separation previously described by J.-L. Birck et                           Os ratio of the standard was 0.1742 þ 0.0002.
al. [13]. This low blank Os extraction procedure                        In order to test sample homogeneity, we made
makes it possible to measure reliable Os isotope                        duplicate analyses using di¡erent aliquots from
ratios in rock samples with 1 ppt or less of total                      the same batch of 30^50 g of powder made
Os content. For each sample 0.5^5 g of powder                           from a single piece of rock.
was used. The mean 2c error (including propaga-                            The concentration data for all the arc lavas
tion of blank error due to correction) of the iso-                      analyzed are given in Table 2. Os concentrations
topic ratios was 1.5%, with three of 90 measured                        are extremely low and variable, ranging from 0.05
ratios having an error higher than 5% (maximum                          to 46 ppt, and Re contents range from 24 up to
11.3%). Because of improvement of the reagent                           915 ppt. 187 Re/188 Os ratios range from 5 to 54 200.
puri¢cation processes, the total Os blank de-                           Although Os and Re contents of the samples
creased during the course of the study from                             might have been somehow a¡ected by fractional
0.220 pg to 0.005 pg, with a mean value of                              crystallization (see Section 4), it is interesting to
Table 2
Os and Re concentrations and Os isotopic ratios for arc volcanoes
Samplea        Island/Volcano/ Rock type       Age or date    187
                                                                    Os/188 Os   Os       Re      187
                                                                                                       Re     187
                                                                                                                  Os SiO2 e Mg#e Nie
               Location                        of eruptionb                                      188 Os      188 Osd
                                                                                                                   init
                                               (yr)           ( þ 2c error)c    (ppt)    (ppt)                          (wt%)    (ppm)
Lesser Antilles
SB9 I           Saba/Mt.           andesite    V106           0.595 (0.004)      2.000    67           171   0.592   54.67 0.68    98
                Sceney/
                Principal Dome
SB9 II                                                        0.540 (0.003)      1.418   139        498      0.531
SB7 I           Saba/Well’s        andesite    4.20U105       0.957 (0.013)      0.728   188      1 376      0.948   60.6   0.59   21
                Bay Dome
SB7 II                                                        1.450 (0.011)      0.905   164      1 023      1.443
SB53            Saba/Old           andesite    V106           0.404 (0.003)      1.054   150        706      0.392   53.7   0.66   50
                Booby’s Dome
SB67            Saba/Airport       andesite    6 5U105        0.215 (0.001)      2.090   150           350   0.212   55.8   0.68   85
                2nd £ow
SB49            Saba/Upper         andesite    V106           0.220 (0.002)      1.729   464      1 306      0.198   59.55 0.61    35
                Hell’s Gate,
                Ancient Dome
SK 11           St. Kitts/Mt.      basalt      6 104          0.179 (0.002)      0.940   301      1 551      0.179   50.3   0.54    9
                Misery
SK9 I           St. Kitts/Mt.      andesite    6 104          0.407 (0.008)      0.248   184      3 763      0.407   56     0.54   12
                Misery
SK9 II                                                        0.446 (0.011)      0.241   187      3 862      0.445
SK9 III                                                       0.432 (0.005)      0.257   185      3 601      0.431
SK6             St. Kitts/Mt.      basalt      6 104          0.236 (0.004)      0.679   335      2 404      0.235   49     0.62   31
                Misery
SK2 I           St. Kitts/Mt.      andesitic   6 104          0.382 (0.005)      0.519   345      3 339      0.381   53     0.52   10
                Misery             basalt
SK2 II                                                        0.560 (0.017)      0.396   361      4 611      0.559
SK2 III                                                       0.498 (0.003)      0.366   383      5 282      0.497
F802            Guadeloupe/        andesite    1^2U105        0.266 (0.030)      1.461   357      1 199      0.262   57.21 0.48     5
                Soufrie're/Nue¤e
                St. Vincent
F802 II                                                       0.274 (0.003)      1.004   457      2 234      0.267
MG 802          Martinique/Mt.     andesite    1902           0.149 (0.001)      1.911   103        262      0.149   62.04 0.46     4
                Pele¤e
MI 902 I        Martinique/Mt.     andesite    13.5U103       0.743 (0.005)      0.375   101      1 413      0.742   60.94 0.46     2
                Pele¤e, Aileron
                Dome
MI 902 II                                                     0.811 (0.025)      0.284
MF 902          Martinique/Mt.     andesitic   1^5U105        0.229 (0.002)      0.837   144           842   0.222   55.17 0.53     7
                Pele¤e, Morne      basalt
                Plume¤e
SV6 I           St. Vincent        andesitic   1979           0.624 (0.003)      2.530   393           798   0.624   54.1   0.55   22
                                   basalt
SV6 II                                                        0.571 (0.004)      3.096   430           708   0.571
SV8001 I       St. Vincent/        andesitic   6 6U105        0.348 (0.001)      5.631                       0.348   53.48 0.54    17
               Soufrie're          basalt
SV8001 II                                                     0.465 (0.004)      3.514   310           445   0.461
SV8001 III                                                    0.555 (0.002)      2.926   279           486   0.550
Java
MR 43 A        Java/Merapi         basalt                     0.523 (0.004)      1.823   448      1 248
BL 36 (39)     Java/Baluran        basalt                     0.262 (0.002)      5.416   246        223
Table 2 (Continued)
Samplea       Island/Volcano/ Rock type   Age or date     187
                                                                Os/188 Os    Os       Re      187
                                                                                                    Re     187
                                                                                                                 Os    SiO2 e Mg#e Nie
              Location                    of eruptionb                                        188 Os      188 Osd
                                                                                                                init
                                          (yr)            ( þ 2c error)c     (ppt)    (ppt)                            (wt%)          (ppm)
Papua New Guinea
94-LIH-11   Papua New                      6 1.6U106      0.1728 (0.0008) 19.60       220            54   0.1585
            Guinea/Lihir
94-AMB-29 Papua New                        6 1.6U106      0.1310 (0.0004) 38.75        37            5    0.1298
            Guinea/Feni/
            Ambittle
Philippines
KH920814-01 Pinatubo         andesite     1991            0.258 (0.003)       0.755   399      2 587      0.258
Izu^Bonin
YH76 I      Honshu/          basalt       6U105           0.164 (0.003)       1.146   328      1 378      0.151        50.69 0.63     56
            Hakone
YH76 II                                                   0.192 (0.013)       1.227   477      1 885      0.174
YH76 III                                                  0.162 (0.001)       1.220   312      1 239      0.150
YH18        Honshu/          dacite       2.7U105         0.831 (0.031)       0.062   384     28 884      0.703        64      0.40    2
            Hakone
YH18 II                                                   1.181 (0.047)       0.048   396     54 197      0.941
YH18 III                                                  0.567 (0.010)       0.109   490     22 891      0.466
K8          Honshu/          andesite     1.5U104         0.154 (0.002)       1.461   353      1 283      0.154        58
            Hakone/
            Komagatake
No. 14 I    Izu Oshima/Mt.   andesite     1986            0.430 (0.010)       0.196   727     17 885      0.430        57.38 0.39      4
            Mihara
No. 14 II                                                 0.419 (0.009)       0.205   726     18 250      0.419
No. 14 III                                                0.409 (0.006)       0.284   865     15 197      0.409
No. 28      Izu Oshima/Mt.   basalt       1986            0.161 (0.004)       0.641   433      3 230      0.161        52.7    0.46   17
            Mihara
No. 28 II                                                 0.209 (0.007)       0.639   432      3 324      0.209
OM4         Honshu/          andesitic    104             0.144 (0.001)       3.615   347        463      0.144        53.3
            Omuro/           basalt
            Komuroyama
Hino I      Honshu/Mt.       basalt        6 1730 þ 30    0.163 (0.002)       1.705   416      1 182      0.163        50.08 0.52     37
            Fuji/
            Hinokimarubi
Hino II                                                   0.208 (0.004)       1.446   662      2 238      0.208
F5          Honshu/Mt.       basalt       864             0.140 (0.001)       3.425   373        525      0.140        50.41 0.52     40
            Fuji/
            Aokigahara
1707        Honshu/Mt.       dacite       1707            0.155 (0.001)       7.781   522           325   0.155        66.06 0.43
            Fuji/Hoei
            crater
F2          Honshu/Mt.       basalt       2U105           0.165 (0.001)       5.974   132           107   0.165        48.8
            Fuji/Mishima
Kamchatka
K77381 I    Klyuchevskoy     basalt        6 104          0.1416 (0.0005) 10.48       387        181      0.142        51.59 0.76     211
K77381 II                                                 0.141 (0.001)    9.581      353        178      0.141
K56P66 I    Klyuchevskoy     andesitic    1966            0.201 (0.004)    2.484      658      1 289      0.201        53.62 0.59     30
                             basalt
K56P66 II                                                 0.203    (0.002)    2.186   463      1 030      0.203
T 1475 II     Tolbachik      basalt       1975            0.175    (0.001)    8.595   409        235      0.175        50.85 0.72     112
T 1475 II                                                 0.176    (0.001)    8.390   377        218      0.176
PT30476 II    Tolbachik      basalt       1976            0.147    (0.001)   11.88    450        183      0.147        51.72 0.54     50
PT30476 II                                                0.147    (0.001)   11.15    506        217      0.147
Table 2 (Continued)
Samplea         Island/Volcano/ Rock type      Age or date    187
                                                                    Os/188 Os    Os       Re      187
                                                                                                        Re     187
                                                                                                                     Os    SiO2 e Mg#e Nie
                Location                       of eruptionb                                       188 Os      188 Osd
                                                                                                                    init
                                               (yr)           ( þ 2c error)c     (ppt)    (ppt)                            (wt%)          (ppm)
                                                      4
P33182    I     Tolbachik          basalt      6 10         0.223      (0.005)    0.514   536      5 067      0.222        52.57 0.55     20
P33182    II                                                0.242      (0.006)    0.571   678      5 796      0.241
P33182    III                                               0.246      (0.004)    0.624   484      3 802      0.245
P33182    IV                                                0.153      (0.003)    1.400   426      1 470      0.153
651-1 I         Krasheninnikov andesitic       3.96U104 (?) 0.230      (0.002)    0.311                                    53.14 0.54     20
                               basalt
651-1 II                                                      0.210 (0.006)    0.324      680     10 312      0.203
651-1 III                                                     0.134 (0.003)    1.285
651-1 IV                                                      0.200 (0.007)    0.467      559      5 794      0.196
A29107 I        Avachinsky         andesitic   6 1.8U106      0.1366 (0.0005) 11.15       286        125      0.136        54.49 0.60     23
                                   basalt
A29107 II                                                     0.228    (0.008)    0.530   646      5 974      0.227
A29107 III                                                    0.181    (0.010)    1.090   361      1 498      0.181
A8501f          Avachinsky         basalt      6 1.8U106      0.133    (0.001)   46.00                                     51.66 0.81     250
K80317 I        Mutnovski          basalt      6 104          0.236    (0.005)    0.747   757      4 967      0.235        51.49 0.52      14
K80317 II                                                     0.231    (0.003)    0.832   915      5 376      0.230
Aleutians
B 1927 I        Bogoslof           basalt      1927           0.201 (0.001)    3.763       24         31      0.201                0.53
B 1927 II                                                     0.319 (0.006)    1.618      166        507      0.319
B 1796 I        Bogoslof           andesite    1796           0.136 (0.001)    5.636      537        935      0.136                0.33
B 1796 II                                                     0.155 (0.001)    6.979      589        408      0.155
ADK53           Adak        andesite           1796           0.1378 (0.0005) 23.56       174         36      0.1378
UM21 I          Umnak/Okmok basalt             1946           0.144 (0.001)    1.364      611      2 162      0.144
UM21 II                                                       0.202 (0.001)    1.054      730      3 371      0.202
Mexico
VE21            Pico de Orizaba    andesite                   0.371 (0.004)       0.672   251      1 861
PU12            Popocatepetl/      andesite    6 23 000       0.250 (0.001)       6.263   287        225      0.250
                Puebla
PO1             Popocatepetl       basalt      6 23 000       0.289 (0.003)       4.296   179           206   0.289
PO6             Popocatepetl       basalt      6 23 000       0.313 (0.004)       3.287   158           238   0.313
SOC9301-A       Socorro Island     basalt      1993           0.130 (0.001)       3.884   710           881   0.130
Colombia
KH 950727       Colombia/          andesite                   0.279 (0.003)       1.647   187           559
                Galeras
Peru^Chile
SHILA I         Peru/Shila                                    0.521 (0.005)       1.207   170           713
16A             Chile/Sierra       andesite                   1.524 (0.007)       2.141   100           265
                del Lipez
6B              Chile/Miscanti     andesite                   0.770    (0.003)    1.877   176           491
17L             Chile/Antuco       basalt      6 10 000       0.145    (0.003)    1.593   234           712   0.145
18N             Chile/Villarrica   basalt      6 14 000       0.133    (0.001)    4.761   165           168   0.133
19M             Argentina/El       basalt                     0.215    (0.001)   21.01    104            24
                Pedrero
a
  Numbers I, II, III and IV are for duplicates of the same sample.
b
  For Lesser Antilles, Kamchatka, Aleutians, Japan and Papua New Guinea, age references are respectively, R. Maury, personal
communication (and [44] for SV8001), [45], [28], [46] and I. Kaneoka, personal communication and [47].
c
  Mass fractionation was corrected using 192 Os/188 Os = 3.08271. Measured ratios were corrected for blank contribution. 2c errors
take blank error propagation into account when several blanks are available for a short period of time.
d
  Age correction uses VRe = 1.64U10311 yr31 [48].
e
  SiO2 , Mg# and Ni compositions were measured at CRPG, Nancy, France, by emission-ICP and ICP-MS respectively, except
for Bogoslof [49] and Antilles (SiO2 and Mg# from R. Maury, personal communication).
f
  Os data from [50].
Fig. 4. 187 Os/188 Os versus 1/188 Os diagrams for the Lesser Antilles (a), Izu^Bonin (b), Kamchatka (c), the Aleutians (d), Mexico
(e) and West Java [7] (f). Each volcano is represented by one single shape of symbol. White symbols are for samples analyzed
once and shades of gray are for multiple analyses of one given sample (for example the three dark gray circles in b are for three
analyses of the Hakone YH18 sample). When larger than the symbol, error bars are added for isotope ratios. Each volcano dis-
plays one alignment, for which the regression line is shown. The intercept values (i) and correlation coe⁄cients (r2 ) of these re-
gression lines are as follows (i3r2 ): St. Vincent (0.128^0.96); Saba (30.132^0.60); Martinique (0.013^0.96); St. Kitts (0.210^0.40)
or (0.108^0.98) (dotted line if sample SK2 is not considered, see text); Izu Oshima (0.093^0.89); Hakone (0.130^0.998); Klyu-
chevskoy (0.123^0.99); Tolbachik (0.153^0.79); Avachinsky (0.133^0.998); Krasheninnikov (0.134^0.86); Bogoslof (0.093^0.97);
Popocatepetl (0.183^0.98); and Java Bajah Dome Miocene (0.334^0.89); Pliocene (0.235^0.82).
resent binary mixing relationships between di¡er-                    YH18, Hakone volcano, Japan). The Re distribu-
ent end-members. Moreover, all the correlations                      tion was much less heterogeneous, but still had
seem to converge on a similar unradiogenic Os-                       a maximum range of 286^646 ppt in sample
rich end-member.                                                     A29107. When reported on the 187 Os/188 Os versus
   Duplicate analyses for half of the samples show                   1/188 Os diagrams (Fig. 4), the multiple analyses of
that both Os concentrations and isotopic ratios                      a heterogeneous sample are in good agreement
are heterogeneous within samples. The largest                        (with the exception of two samples, B1796, Bogo-
ranges observed in a sample for Os concentrations                    slof, Aleutians and P33182, Tolbachik, Kamchat-
and 187 Os/188 Os initial ratios were respectively                   ka) with the mixing line de¢ned for the whole set
0.530^11.151 ppt (sample A29107, Avachinsky                          of samples from the same volcano (e.g., samples
volcano, Kamchatka) and 0.466^0.941 (sample                          from St. Vincent island, Lesser Antilles and sam-
ple YH18, Hakone, Japan), or even de¢ne them-                  The two main hypotheses that will be discussed
selves a mixing line (651-1, Krasheninnikov,                   are shallow-level fractionation and contamination
Kamchatka, r2 = 0.86).                                         of the magmas and heterogeneity of the mantle
                                                               source due to subducted slab supply.
   Important variations exist in Re and Os con-                   The arc lavas analyzed in this study have ex-
tents and Os isotope ratios of arc lavas. Those                tremely low Os contents (mostly 9 10 ppt) when
variations are observed in subduction zones                    compared to mantle peridotites. These small con-
from all around the world and seem to re£ect                   centrations may re£ect the compatible behavior of
binary mixing relationships expressed by positive              Os during mantle melting. However, since most of
linear correlations between the Os isotopic ratio              the samples are di¡erentiated, fractional crystalli-
and the inverse of its concentration.                          zation may also play an important role in lava
   All the correlations seem to converge on a sim-             concentrations, although it alone cannot produce
ilar unradiogenic Os-rich end-member (Fig. 4).                 the linear relationships displayed in Fig. 4 because
Yet, the actual regression lines’ intercepts display           isotopes are not fractionated by such a process.
a large range of 187 Os/188 Os values, from 0.013 to              Nevertheless, the e¡ect of fractional crystalliza-
0.334 (except for Saba, Lesser Antilles : 30.132).             tion on Os contents is still a matter of debate. As
This range includes upper mantle values, as de-                Os is clearly a compatible element in the terres-
¢ned from both MORB glasses [6] and peridotites                trial mantle, one would also expect its content in
(e.g.,[15]), and may indicate Os isotope heteroge-             lavas to decrease with increasing silica content
neity of the depleted part of the mantle wedge,                and to be concentrated in Fe^Mg minerals. How-
due, for example, to di¡erent metasomatism his-                ever, recent studies have shown that Os is in-
tories. However, this explanation should be taken              compatible in magmatic olivine (from oceanic
with caution because the range in the unradiogen-              basalts), as opposed to mantle olivine [16,17].
ic component signature likely results only from                Consequently, the authors inferred that fractional
poor determination of the origin of the mixing                 crystallization alone cannot explain the Os^Mg^
lines, as illustrated by the meaningless negative              Ni variations observed in oceanic basalt, but
intercept for Saba. Because the study of the man-              source heterogeneity or sul¢de/olivine parallel
tle wedge composition is beyond the scope of this              crystallization could.
paper, the unradiogenic component will, from                      We have thus plotted Os contents as a function
here, be taken to represent the mantle wedge, re-              of SiO2 , Mg# and Ni contents in Fig. 5. Taken as
gardless of its possible Os isotopic heterogeneity.            a whole, the present analyses fail to reveal any
   In this section, we will discuss the nature of              clear correlation between Os contents and indices
materials, which can possibly represent the Os                 of di¡erentiation such as SiO2 (Fig. 5a) or La/Yb
radiogenic components identi¢ed in arc lavas.                  (not shown). However, for Japan, a negative cor-
These materials, and the processes by which                    relation appears with SiO2 , with the exception of
they impart their signatures to lavas, must ac-                the most Os-rich and silica-rich sample. For Ja-
count for: (1) the systematic occurrence of binary             pan and Kamchatka, positive relationships also
mixtures in arc volcanoes from various geody-                  appear between Os and Ni and Mg#, for the
namic settings; (2) a time-dependent variation in              whole arc data set, as well as within each volcano
the radiogenic component for a given volcano [7];              sample set, although it should be noted that in the
(3) the radiogenic signatures of both primitive and            latter case, such trends are based on two or three
di¡erentiated arc lavas; (4) the existence of a va-            samples only. These observations suggest, at least
riety of Os radiogenic components in subduction-               for these arcs, that Os behavior during fractional
related volcanism; and (5) the heterogeneity in Os             crystallization is somehow related to that of Ni.
concentrations and isotopic ratios of the samples.             However, it must be emphasized that from the
thickness or age of the overlying plate, as could              tion to the fact that hydrothermalism may be a
be expected for simple contamination via base-                 signi¢cant process overprinting initial Os isotope
ment assimilation.                                             ratios of lavas, because of the low closure temper-
   Moreover, even though assimilation of conti-                ature of pyrrhotite and possibly other Os-rich
nental crust (and oceanic crust) would strongly                sul¢de or oxide phases. However, as for the as-
a¡ect, through partial melting, the incompatible               similation hypotheses, it is unlikely that hydro-
element contents of arc basalts, it is less clear              thermal events occurred systematically in all the
what the e¡ect is on a compatible element such                 areas we looked at, regardless of the particular
as Os, which is likely to be very radiogenic but               setting of each zone.
also very depleted in crustal materials. One could                In summary, although some arc magmas are
thus expect that compatible elements are signi¢-               contaminated by the crustal basement they travel
cantly less involved in the assimilation process.              through (as shown by their trace element and Sr,
Yet, as mentioned above, the studied samples dis-              O, Nd or Pb isotope signatures), and di¡erenti-
play very typical arc lava patterns in Fig. 1, which           ated magmas are more likely to be exposed to
show no evidence of secondary enrichment from                  such a process, it seems unlikely that the high
crustal material.                                              Os isotope ratios measured in arc lavas presented
   Finally, the linear relationships between Os iso-           here and the systematic observation of Os isotope
topes and the inverse of Os concentrations could               mixing lines for a set of worldwide subduction-
be explained by a constant assimilation/di¡eren-               related volcanoes can be explained by this single
tiation ratio (AFC model). This would further                  process. The lack of understanding of Os behav-
imply that the Os concentrations and isotope ra-               ior during both crystallization and partial melting
tios of arc lavas decrease with increasing degree of           of basement wall rocks in contact with hot mag-
di¡erentiation of the rocks. However, as already               ma makes it di⁄cult at present to discuss more
mentioned, no clear relationship exists between                precisely this hypothesis, and we believe that fur-
Os and di¡erentiation indices (SiO2 , Mg# (Fig.                ther investigation is needed to assess its e¡ects on
5a,b), and trace elements) for the samples ana-                Os contents of lavas.
lyzed (except, to some extent, for Os contents in
Japan and Kamchatka, but it is not true for Os                 4.2. Mantle source heterogeneity
isotope ratios (not shown)) and primitive arc
lavas from Kamchatka show mixing lines and ra-                    An alternative explanation for the Os charac-
diogenic Os ratios similar to the ones for the more            teristics of arc lavas is that the mixing lines docu-
silica-rich arc samples analyzed in this study (cf.            mented in this study re£ect mixtures, in the
Fig. 4c).                                                      source, of Os from the mantle and from the
   In the case of Java [7], contamination by base-             slab. In this case, the unradiogenic components
ment rocks was dismissed for this reason and also              can be accounted for by the mantle wedge and
because it was hard to reconcile with the two                  the radiogenic components may be either the al-
radically di¡erent mixing trends de¢ned by Mio-                tered oceanic crust and/or the sediments that are
cene and Pliocene samples of the single Bajah                  subducted beneath the arc. A similar hypothesis
volcanic dome of Java, especially because it would             has been proposed for the Miocene and Pliocene
imply that osmium isotopic characteristics of the              trends de¢ned by samples from Bajah Volcano
basement have strongly changed with time.                      from Java [7], mainly because each of these trends
   Os mobility has been observed in hydrothermal               was formed by samples having a distinct and ho-
systems of mid-ocean ridge settings [23], and hy-              mogeneous Pb signature, MORB-like Pb isotope
drothermal contamination after eruption has been               ratios for Miocene samples and sediment-like Pb
invoked to explain some highly radiogenic signa-               ratios for Pliocene samples.
tures of oceanic basalts [24] via secondary post-                 Sediments have 187 Os/188 Os isotope ratios of
entrapment alteration by seawater-derived radio-               about 1 and 1.3, for marine and terrigenous sedi-
genic Os. Moreover, Brenan et al. [19] call atten-             ments respectively (e.g., [8]). These high values are
in good agreement with the radiogenic end-mem-                     Applying the calculation adopted for Java sam-
bers of some of the mixing lines (for example, St.              ples to the other subduction zones (taking into
Vincent, St. Kitts, or the Kamchatka trends).                   account the respective ages of the crust and the
However, sediments alone cannot account for all                 average 187 Re/188 Os ratios of MORB for the given
the trends we have determined, especially those                 ocean [6]), we obtain, in the case of Izu^Bonin,
that have isotopic ratios similar to or even higher             Kamchatka, the Lesser Antilles, the Aleutians,
than those of sediments (Mt. Hakone in Japan,                   and Mexico, 187 Os/188 Os ratios of 13, 8, 1.4, 5
Martinique and Saba in the Antilles, Miocene                    and 1.4 respectively, for the subducting oceanic
lavas in Java). Moreover, in the case of Kamchat-               crust. These values are all higher than the more
ka, previously published Pb isotope data seem to                radiogenic arc lava from the same region, except
exclude sediments as a signi¢cant component of                  for the Lesser Antilles, where one sample is
the magma source (e.g., [25]).                                  slightly more radiogenic than the estimated
   The oceanic crust subducting at the trenches of              down-going oceanic crust. Therefore, adding ra-
the considered subduction zones has high 187 Re/                diogenic Os from the subducted oceanic crust to
188
    Os ratios (based on MORB values from [6])                   the mantle wedge appears to be a potential way to
with a range of ages from 15 to 150 Ma. Conse-                  explain the binary mixtures observed for each vol-
quently, the subducted crust must be much more                  cano. As 187 Re/188 Os ratios have been shown to
radiogenic than the mantle wedge rocks and                      be quite variable along a single ridge [6], for the
therefore gives a potential end-member for the                  Lesser Antilles, the calculated altered oceanic
observed trends of Fig. 4. For example in Java,                 crust 187 Os/188 Os ratio (considering the average
                                                                187
where the highest Os isotope ratios were mea-                       Re/188 Os value for the Atlantic MORB) may
sured, an estimate of the oceanic crust Os ratio                be lower than the actual ratio of the crust beneath
gives a value of 6 for the 187 Os/188 Os ratio [7],             the Lesser Antilles arc.
which is much higher than the highest ratio mea-                   However, the case of Java shows that the crust
sured in an arc lava (3.15 [7]). Moreover, it is a              alone cannot explain the existence of two linear
priori di¡erent for each subduction zone depend-                trends for the Miocene and the Pliocene samples
ing on the age and 187 Re/188 Os ratio of the crust.            from this volcano because it would imply either
Yet, Re and Os behaviors during hydrothermal-                   an important change in the mobilization of radio-
ism at ridges and during metamorphic processes                  genic Os or that the crust subducted below the
are poorly understood and the 187 Re/188 Os ratio               volcanic dome did not have the same isotopic
of the subducting slab may be quite di¡erent from               signature during the Miocene and Pliocene. More-
the ratios measured in MORB. Eclogites and                      over, some regions, Java, and also the Lesser An-
blueschists, which are thought to be the result of              tilles, clearly display sediment-like signatures for
metamorphism of the oceanic crust during sub-                   Sr, Nd and Pb isotopes (e.g., [1,27]), and thus the
duction, have similar Os concentrations and sig-                role of sediments in their Os signatures should be
ni¢cantly lower Re concentrations when com-                     considered.
pared to MORB [26]. In this case, calculated                       Combining oceanic crust and subducted sedi-
values for the Os isotope ratio of altered oceanic              ments in the magma source could be another
crust may be overestimated when using 187 Re/                   way to explain the unique characteristics of the
188
    Os values of MORB. However, Becker [26] sug-                source of each volcano [7]. Unfortunately, the
gested that Re is more likely removed from the                  lack of constraints on the actual Os isotope char-
oceanic crust during the subduction metamor-                    acteristics of the subducting materials at each par-
phism itself, rather than during hydrothermalism                ticular trench and Os partition coe⁄cients during
at ridges. In this case, the oceanic crust can devel-           partial melting of metasomatized sources and slab
op very high Os isotope ratios by radio-decay of                dehydrating processes makes it di⁄cult at present
Re during its transport to the trench, before re-               to quantitatively model the mixing processes. In
leasing Re in larger amounts than Os in the sub-                any case, the observations suggest that a three-
duction zone.                                                   component mixture could occur in the melting
zone, between the depleted upper mantle rocks                   of the islands along the Lesser Antilles arc may be
and variable proportions of oceanic crust and                   along-arc 187 Re/188 Os ratio heterogeneity of the
sediments, a hypothesis supported by previous                   oceanic and/or di¡erent partition coe⁄cients for
arc studies (e.g., [2,28]). Furthermore, the linearity          Os from one volcano source to another depending
of the trends obtained in the 187 Os/188 Os versus 1/           on the slab physical parameters or on slab water
188
    Os diagram suggests that the ratio of recycled              contents.
sediments to oceanic crust contributions is con-                   Another point is the possibility of preserving
stant for a given volcano at a given period of                  these source characteristics through magma ascent
time. The slab-derived H2 O-rich component is be-               in the mantle and in the arc basement before
lieved to induce mantle melting at mantle wedge                 reaching the surface. Not only arc lavas but also
temperatures, by lowering the peridotite solidus                HIMU OIB have radiogenic Os signatures which
(e.g., [29]). The Os results further suggest that               may be interpreted as originating from crust re-
the radiogenic slab component, made of sedi-                    cycling in the mantle melting zone [4,5]. Several
ment-derived and oceanic crust-derived materials,               disequilibrium hypotheses have been proposed to
was homogenized before initiating mantle melt-                  allow these magmas to reach the surface without
ing. A similar conclusion has been reached based                having equilibrated with unradiogenic Os-rich
on boron and beryllium contents [28], and boron                 mantle peridotites, including shielding of mantle
isotope [3] data on arc lavas. We must note, how-               Os in Os-rich phases within host minerals [31],
ever, that unlike our results, these studies infer              slow equilibration kinetics between peridotites
that the homogeneous subducted component                        and melts [26], isolation of melts from peridotites
made from oceanic crust and sediments contribu-                 by reaction zones along conduit walls [26], and
tions is unique for a whole arc [28] or across an               rapid ascent through a network of channels [4].
arc from the volcanic front to the back-arc [3].                   Finally, another disequilibrium state, which is
   Although source heterogeneity can account for                inferred from arc lavas, is sample heterogeneity
the observed Os characteristics in arc lavas, it                for Os contents and isotope ratios. Such hetero-
raises a few questions, which can be summarized                 geneity has also been observed in mantle rocks
as follows.                                                     and OIB (e.g., [15]), and led, for mantle rocks,
   First, it has not been possible so far to observe            to the ‘nugget e¡ect’ hypothesis, which is a pref-
any covariation between Os and either other sub-                erential distribution of Os in refractory sul¢de or
duction contributions or mantle melting indices in              oxide micro-inclusions. These Os-bearing phases
our data, which would con¢rm the deep origin of                 may be in isotopic disequilibrium with their host
Os signatures. This is likely due to the e¡ect of               minerals, suggesting that di¡usion processes be-
later fractional crystallization on the trace element           tween the inclusion and the host mineral have
contents of the fractionated rocks.                             been prevented [31]. For lavas, the observed het-
   Second, the respective proportions of oceanic                erogeneity implies that the magmas themselves are
crust and sedimentary Os cannot be the only fac-                heterogeneous in concentration and isotopic com-
tors responsible for the slope of the mixing line.              position, and that they are not homogenized dur-
Indeed, in that case, the Lesser Antilles arc should            ing ascent to the surface. Although such a process
show decreasing slopes from northern to central                 is not well constrained at present, Os heterogene-
islands, because of the increasing thickness of the             ity of the samples suggests that the radiogenic Os
sediment column in the Lesser Antilles trench                   transferred from lithospheric £uids or melts can-
(e.g., [30]). Yet, this is not the case (cf. St. Kitts          not equilibrate, within the arc magmas, with the
and Saba, Fig. 4). A possible explanation may be                unradiogenic Os coming from the mantle.
modi¢cation of the original Os contents by frac-
tional crystallization, without destroying the mix-
ing trends, but fractional crystallization more                 Acknowledgements
likely accounts only for scatter in some trends.
Another explanation for the varying mixing lines                   The authors wish to thank R. Maury, M. Se-
met, I. Kaneoka, J.-L. Joron and J.-C. Komor-                              Lassen region of the Cascade arc, California, Earth Plan-
                                                                           et. Sci. Lett. 177 (2000) 301^317.
owski for providing most of the samples. We are
                                                                    [12]   J.C. Lassiter, J.F. Luhr, Osmium abundance and isotope
very grateful to J.-L. Birck for technical assistance                      variations in ma¢c Mexican volcanic rocks: Evidence for
in measuring Os concentrations and isotope ra-                             crustal contamination and constraints on the geochemical
tios. We also thank K. Burton and B. Bourdon                               behavior of osmium during partial melting and fractional
for pro¢table discussions, and P. Foster for care-                         crystallization, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2 (2001)
ful reading and improving of the manuscript. C.                            2000GC000116.
                                                                    [13]   J.-L. Birck, M. Roy-Barman, F. Capmas, Re-Os isotopic
Hawkesworth and an anonymous reviewer are                                  measurements at the femtomole level in natural samples,
also thanked for their thorough reviews. This                              Geostand. Newslett. 20 (1) (1997) 19^27.
work was largely supported by a grant from the                      [14]   J.L. Birck, C.J. Alle'gre, Contrasting Re/Os magmatic
Bureau de Recherches Ge¤ologiques et Minie'res                             fractionation in planetary basalts, Earth Planet. Sci.
                                                                           Lett. 124 (1994) 139^148.
(BRGM) to S.A.[BW]
                                                                    [15]   S.R. Hart, G. Ravizza, Os partitioning between phases in
                                                                           lherzolite and basalt, in: A. Basu, S.R. Hart (Eds.), Earth
                                                                           Processes: Reading the Isotopic Code, Am. Geophys.
References                                                                 Union, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 123^134.
                                                                    [16]   K.W. Burton, P. Schiano, A. Gannoun, J.-L. Birck, C.J.
 [1] D. BenOthman, W.M. White, P.J. Patchett, The geochem-                 Alle'gre, Contrasting behaviour of osmium in mantle and
     istry of marine sediments, island arc magma genesis and               magmatic olivine, in: Fall Meeting, EOS Trans. AGU,
     crust-mantle recycling, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 94 (1989)            San Francisco, CA, 2000.
     1^21.                                                          [17]   J.M. Brenan, W.F. McDonough, I. Horn, P. Sattari, Ol-
 [2] C.J. Hawkesworth, S.P. Turner, F. McDermott, D.W.                     ivine-melt partitioning of Re and the PGEs: Experimental
     Peate, P. van Calsteren, U-Th isotopes in arc magmas:                 constraints, in: Spring Meeting, EOS Trans. AGU, 2000.
     Implications for element transfer from the subducted           [18]   J.P. Davidson, Crustal contamination versus subduction
     crust, Science 276 (1997) 551^555.                                    zone enrichment: Examples from the Lesser Antilles and
 [3] T. Ishikawa, E. Nakamura, Origin of the slab component                implications for mantle source compositions of island arc
     in arc lavas from across-arc variation of B and Pb iso-               volcanic rocks, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51 (1987)
     topes, Nature 370 (1994) 205^208.                                     2185^2198.
 [4] E.H. Hauri, S.R. Hart, Re-Os isotope systematics of            [19]   J.M. Brenan, D.J. Cherniak, L.A. Rose, Di¡usion of os-
     HIMU and EMII oceanic island basalts from the South                   mium in pyrrhotite and pyrite: implications for closure of
     Paci¢c Ocean, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 114 (1993) 353^371.            the Re-Os isotopic system, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 180
 [5] P. Schiano, K.W. Burton, B. Dupre¤, J.L. Birck, G. Guille,            (2000) 399^413.
     C.J. Alle'gre, Correlated Os-Pb-Nd-Sr isotopes in the Aus-     [20]   W. Hildreth, S. Moorbath, Crustal contributions to arc
     tral-Cook chain basalts: The nature of the mantle com-                magmatism in the Andes of Central Chile, Contrib. Min-
     ponents in plume sources, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 186                eral. Petrol. 98 (1988) 455^489.
     (2001) 527^537.                                                [21]   D.J. DePaolo, Trace element and isotopic e¡ects of com-
 [6] P. Schiano, J.-L. Birck, C.J. Alle'gre, Osmium-strontium-             bined wall rock assimilation and fractional crystallization,
     neodymium-lead isotopic covariations in mid-ocean ridge               Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 53 (1981) 189^202.
     basalt glasses and the heterogeneity of the upper mantle,      [22]   W.A. Bohrson, F.J. Spera, Energy-constrained open-sys-
     Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 150 (1997) 363^381.                          tem magmatic processes II: Application of energy-con-
 [7] S. Alves, P. Schiano, C.J. Alle'gre, Rhenium-osmium iso-              strained assimilation-fractional crystallization (EC-AFC)
     topic investigation of Java subduction zone lavas, Earth              model to magmatic systems, J. Petrol. 42 (2001) 1019^
     Planet. Sci. Lett. 168 (1999) 65^77.                                  1041.
 [8] B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, G. Ravizza, A.W. Hofmann, The           [23]   G.E. Bru«gmann, P. Herzig, A.W. Hofmann, Os isotopic
     marine 187 Os/186 Os record of the past 80 million years,             composition and Os and Re distribution in the active
     Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 130 (1995) 155^167.                          mound of the TAG-hydrothermal system, Mid-Atlantic
 [9] T. Meisel, R.J. Walker, J.W. Morgan, The osmium iso-                  Ridge, Proc. ODP Sci. Results 158 (1998) 91^100.
     topic composition of the Earth’s primitive upper mantle,       [24]   F. Marcantonio, A. Zindler, T. Elliott, H. Staudigel, Os
     Nature 383 (1996) 517^520.                                            isotope systematics of La Palma, Canary Islands: Evi-
[10] B.K. Esser, K.K. Turekian, The osmium isotopic compo-                 dence for recycled crust in the mantle source of HIMU
     sition of the continental crust, Geochim. Cosmochim.                  ocean islands, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 133 (1995) 397^410.
     Acta 57 (1993) 3093^3104.                                      [25]   A.B. Kersting, R.J. Arculus, Pb isotope composition of
[11] L.E. Borg, A.D. Brandon, M.A. Clynne, W.J. Walker,                    Klyuchevskoy volcano, Kamchatka and North Paci¢c
     Re-Os isotopic systematics of primitive lavas from the                sediments: Implications for magma genesis and crustal
       recycling in the Kamchatkan arc, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.              song, Seismic studies on the Ontong Java Plateau, Tecto-
       136 (1995) 133^148.                                                    nophysics 34 (1976) 71^90.
[26]   H. Becker, Re-Os fractionation in eclogites and blueschists     [40]   D.M. Finlayson, J.P. Cull, Structural pro¢les in the New
       and the implications for recycling of oceanic crust into the           Britain-New Ireland region, J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 20 (1973)
       mantle, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 177 (2000) 287^300.                   37^48.
[27]   J.P. Davidson, Lesser Antilles isotopic evidence of the         [41]   W.B. Hamilton, Tectonics of the Indonesian Region, U.S.
       role of subducted sediment in island arc magma genesis,                Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper, 1979, 345 pp.
       Nature 306 (1983) 253^256.                                      [42]   T. Matsuda, Collision of the Izu-Bonin arc with central
[28]   J.D. Morris, W.P. Leeman, F. Tera, The subducted com-                  Honshu: Cenozoic tectonics of the Fossa Magna, Japan,
       ponent in island arc lavas: Constraints from Be isotopes               in: S. Uyeda, R.W. Murphy, K. Kobayashi (Eds.), Geo-
       and B-Be systematics, Nature 344 (1990) 31^36.                         dynamics of the Western Paci¢c, Advances in Earth and
[29]   E. Stolper, S. Newman, The role of water in the petro-                 Planetary Sciences, Vol. 6, Japan Scienti¢c Societies Press,
       genesis of Mariana trough magmas, Earth Planet. Sci.                   Tokyo, 1979, pp. 409^421.
       Lett. 121 (1994) 293^325.                                       [43]   B.F. Watson, K. Fujita, Tectonic evolution of Kamchatka
[30]   R.C. Maury, G.K. Westbrook, P.E. Baker, P. Bouysse, D.                 and the Sea of Okhotsk and implications for the Paci¢c
       Westercamp, Geology of the Lesser Antilles, in: G. Deng,               Basin, in: D.G. Howell (Ed.), Tectonostratigraphic Ter-
       J.E. Case (Eds.), The Geology of North America, H, The                 ranes, Circum-Paci¢c Council for Energy and Mineral
       Caribbean Region, Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, CO, 1990,                   Resources, Houston, TX, 1985, pp. 333^348.
       pp. 141^165.                                                    [44]   E. Heath, S.P. Turner, R. Macdonald, C.J. Hawkesworth,
[31]   K.W. Burton, P. Schiano, J.-L. Birck, C.J. Alle'gre, Osmi-             P. van Calsteren, Long magma residence times at island
       um isotope disequilibrium between mantle minerals in a                 arc volcano (Soufrie're, St. Vincent) in the Lesser Antilles
       spinel-lherzolite, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 172 (1999) 311^            Evidence from 238 U-230 Th isochron dating, Earth Planet.
       322.                                                                   Sci. Lett. 160 (1998) 49^63.
[32]   S.S. Sun, W.F. McDonough, Chemical and isotopic sys-            [45]   F. Pineau, M.P. Semet, N. Grassineau, V.M. Okrugin, M.
       tematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle com-              Javoy, The genesis of the stable isotope (O, H) record in
       position and processes, in: A.D. Saunders, M.J. Norry                  arc magmas: The Kamchatka’s case, Chem. Geol. 153
       (Eds.), Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, Vol. 42, Geol.                  (1999) 93^124.
       Soc., Blackwell Scienti¢c, Oxford, 1989, pp. 313^345.           [46]   M. Tatsumoto, R.J. Knight, Isotopic composition of lead
[33]   A.W. Hofmann, Chemical di¡erentiation of the Earth:                    in volcanic rocks from central Honshu ^ with regard to
       The relationship between mantle, continental crust, and                basalt genesis, Geochem. J. 3 (1969) 53^86.
       oceanic crust, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 90 (1988) 297^314.      [47]   R.W. Johnson, D.A. Wallace, D.J. Ellis, Feldspathoid-
[34]   J. Gill, Orogenic Andesites and Plate Tectonics, Springer-             bearing potassic rocks and associated types from volcanic
       Verlag, Berlin, 1981, 390 pp.                                          islands o¡ the coast of New Ireland Papua New Guinea:
[35]   J.W. Curtis, Plate tectonics of the Papua New Guinea-                  A preliminary account of geology and petrology, in: R.D.
       Solomon Islands region, J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 20 (1973)                  Johnson (Ed.), Volcanism in Australia, Elsevier, Amster-
       21^36.                                                                 dam, 1976.
[36]   T.A. Plank, C.H. Langmuir, The chemical composition of          [48]   M. Lindner, D.A. Leich, G.P. Russ, J.M. Bazan, R.J.
       subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust                 Borg, Direct determination of the half-life of 187 Re, Geo-
       and mantle, Chem. Geol. 145 (1998) 325^394.                            chim. Cosmochim. Acta 53 (1989) 1597^1606.
[37]   R.D. Jarrard, Relations among subduction parameters,            [49]   M.T. McCulloch, M.R. Per¢t, 143 Nd/144 Nd, 87 Sr/86 Sr and
       Rev. Geophys. 24 (1986) 217^284.                                       trace element constraints on the petrogenesis of Aleutian
[38]   G.K. Westbrook, Magnetic lineations and fracture zones,                island arc magmas, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 56 (1981) 167^
       in: R.C. Speed, G.K. Westbrook (Eds.), Lesser Antilles                 179.
       Arc and Adjacent Terranes: Ocean Margin Drilling Pro-           [50]   M. Roy-Barman, Mesure du rapport 187 Os/186 Os dans les
       gram Regional Atlas Series, Marine Science International,              basaltes et pe¤ridotites: Contribution a' la syste¤matique
                                                                              187
       Woods Hole, MA, 1984, Sheet 5.                                             Re/186 Os dans le manteau, The'se en Ge¤ochimie, Uni-
[39]   A.S. Furumoto, J.P. Webb, M.E. Odegard, D.M. Hus-                      versite¤ Denis Diderot, Paris VII, 1993.