5/24/23, 8:29 AM Beware Elon Musk’s warped libertarianism | Financial Times

Make sense of it all.

Become an FT subscriber. Pay annually and save 20%

Subscribe now

Opinion  US politics & policy

Beware Elon Musk’s warped libertarianism
The billionaire entrepreneur’s AI initiative is disturbing in light of his selective approach
to political and civic freedoms

EDWARD LUCE

© Ellie Foreman-Peck

Edward Luce 41 MINUTES AGO

Receive free US politics & policy updates

We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest US politics & policy news every
morning.
Enter your email address Sign up

https://www.ft.com/content/7ca8e38d-8ecf-4de2-870d-9bd0a2476147 1/4
5/24/23, 8:29 AM Beware Elon Musk’s warped libertarianism | Financial Times

Future generations might say that the big event of 2023 was when Elon Musk thought
of TruthGPT — the “maximum truth-seeking AI” he plans to launch. Musk is many
things — brilliant engineer, massive risk-taker, overgrown adolescent. One thing he is
not is someone who can be trusted with a technology that could assume God-like
influence over our lives. Nor is anyone for that matter. But the point about billionaire
libertarians is that they have the money to do whatever they want.

There are roughly eight billion reasons why the rest of humanity should find that
disquieting. We could start with the most basic: American libertarians should rarely
be taken at face value. They generally share two characteristics. The first is that they
are rich. It is as rare to find an impoverished libertarian as it is to find a wealthy
socialist. The second reason is that their libertarianism rarely stretches beyond their
personal freedoms, especially the liberty not to be taxed. Other people’s freedom is
their own lookout.

Once you accept that Musk’s world view seems to be that he should be allowed to do
what he wants, his philosophical confusion ceases to matter. The same applies to
many in his cohort, such as Peter Thiel, Ken Griffin and Charles Koch. Watch what
they do, not what they say. Many of them subscribe to the outlook on life of Ayn
Rand’s epic individualist John Galt, the fictional character in Atlas Shrugged, whose
selfishness is presented as heroic. This novel’s message is that extreme selfishness can
be extremely moral.

Some of Musk’s fellow billionaires support Donald Trump, who is the most un-
libertarian figure in US politics. If the former president is re-elected next year, he has
promised to pass a federal ban on abortion, deport millions of illegal immigrants and
impose a loyalty test on federal employees. He has vowed to be America’s
“retribution”.

Little of this fits with commonsensical ideas of freedom. Many plausibly argue that
Trump’s return would spell the end of US liberal democracy. Not much of this seems
to bother the libertarians. Trump, of course, enacted the largest corporate tax cut in
US history — a $2tn measure that disproportionately benefited the super-rich. That
Musk is this week hosting Ron DeSantis’s presidential launch on Twitter is a nuance.
The Florida governor wants to be Trump without the personal drama.

https://www.ft.com/content/7ca8e38d-8ecf-4de2-870d-9bd0a2476147 2/4
5/24/23, 8:29 AM Beware Elon Musk’s warped libertarianism | Financial Times

Most billionaires, whether on the left or the right, think that they got rich because
government stayed out of the way. You hear this account as much from Mark
Zuckerberg’s liberal friends as from conservatives. However, this is often convenient
amnesia. Musk’s Tesla, for example, received $465mn of taxpayers’ stimulus money in
2009. The research that resulted in Google’s search engine was funded by the
National Science Foundation in the 1990s. They seem like small numbers today but
they were decisive when these big fish were minnows.

Libertarian free speech values are also selective. Among democracies, the US is
unique in interpreting any curb on election spending as an attack on free speech. That
means people like Musk have infinitely more speech than the average person. There
are no limits on what they can contribute to their favourite causes or candidates. Peter
Thiel’s $15mn was critical to JD Vance’s success in winning an Ohio Senate seat last
year. Both Thiel and Vance are admirers of Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s self-styled
illiberal prime minister.

Musk has converted Twitter into his idea of a free-speech platform. He alleged Twitter
was censored by liberals prior to his $44bn acquisition last year. To be sure, there
were instances where flags were put on tweets that went against the rapidly evolving
science on Covid, such as mask wearing, for examples. Its guidelines were often
arbitrary. Now, however, it is turning into a vehicle for Musk’s id. Last week he
tweeted that George Soros, the liberal billionaire, was a menace to civilisation: He
“hates humanity”, said Musk. Soros demonisation is a sure sign you are falling into
dark conspiratorialism. See Orbán, Russian president Vladimir Putin or Benjamin
Netanyahu, Israel’s premier.

Musk’s love of free speech vanishes when it comes to China. I challenge readers to
find one critical thing Musk has said about the most censored big society on earth.
Twitter is blocked in China. But Tesla has a large plant in Shanghai and is planning to
open another. “I’ll say what I want to say and if the consequence of that is losing
money, then so be it,” said Musk when asked about his comments on Soros. That was
badly misleading. Musk can tolerate losses on his Twitter vanity project. But he has
bet the farm on Tesla. Criticising China would put Tesla’s business model in jeopardy.

https://www.ft.com/content/7ca8e38d-8ecf-4de2-870d-9bd0a2476147 3/4
5/24/23, 8:29 AM Beware Elon Musk’s warped libertarianism | Financial Times

Musk, like Thiel, has the right to say what he likes and invest his money where he
wants. Nothing in America is seriously threatening that. But this does not give him the
right to be taken seriously. The sooner people see Musk’s political motives for what
they are, not what he claims them to be, the better for society’s mental health. Even if
he were right about government’s failings, Washington needs to put a titanium fence
around AI.

[email protected]

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved.

https://www.ft.com/content/7ca8e38d-8ecf-4de2-870d-9bd0a2476147 4/4