NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY
PSY 101 Lab Experiment
Measurement of Abstract Reasoning
Course: PSY 101 L Section: 34
Prepared by:
Laminum Mashura Khan
I’d:2012044630
Submitted to: Fariea Bakul
Lecturer Department of History & Philosophy, North South University
Date of Conduction: December 15,2022
Date of Submission: December 15,2022
Experiment 2
Measurement of Abstract Reasoning
Abstract
The capacity of the brain and memory to the vision, there are differences in point of view for
different peoples. This experiment explores the differences in abstract reasoning ability from
person to person. There was one participant, a 23-year-old male undergraduate student. The
participant took part in an abstract reasoning test where they had 25 minutes to answer 50
multiple-choice questions where they had to answer based on identifying patterns of various
shapes and figuring out the next shape in the sequence. The participant scored 34 out of 50 which
falls under the 35 percentile and this value can be considered to be typical for a normal adult
according to some previous studies. While this result implied that the abstract reasoning capacity
of the participant was typical, it did agree with the formulated hypothesis. Hence, it was
concluded that having 35 percentile is the value (or score) below which 35 of the observations
have been found and this value indicated that the abstract reasoning capacity of the participant
was typical.
Introduction
Psychological testing is done in order to know an individual and provide a valuable
understanding of an individual’s behavior, skills, thoughts, and personality. Psychological testing
is never based on a single experimental score or number. It includes nine different types of tests:
1. Intelligence tests
2. Personality tests
3. Attitude tests
4. Achievement tests
5. Aptitude tests
6. Neuropsychological tests
7. Vocational tests
8. Direct observational tests
9. Sexological tests.
Literature Review
ADAT research was conducted in Europe in 2013 which has the largest data base. It was found
that an average age-related decline in DAT availability of 3.5 % per decade was found where
people had a significant effect on SBR in the caudate and putamen for the NOACSC and AC
data, and only in the left caudate for the ACSC data (BRASS method).
The results of this test are immediately available due to its affordability which helps testing for
first screening. Multiple-choice questions make up aptitude tests, which are given under exam
settings. A normal test could give 30 to 40 minutes to answer 50 questions because they are
strictly timed. Typically, there will be more questions than the participant has time to answer,
therefore the goal is to provide as many accurate responses as the participant can.
Characteristics of Aptitude Tests
An aptitude test is an exam used to determine an individual’s skill or propensity to succeed
in a given activity. Aptitude tests assume that individuals have inherent strengths and weaknesses
and have a natural inclination toward success or failure in specific areas based on their innate
characteristics.
Aptitude tests are generally used for job placement, college program entry, and to help people to
Purpose
The purpose of this experiment is to find out if the result of Abstract Reasoning ability is affected
by the gender of the participants.
Variables
Independent variables: A participant.
Dependent variables: Scores on the Abstract Reasoning
Methodology
Design
A single subject repeated measure design was used in this experiment.
Participant
The participant was a young man who is currently an undergraduate student at North
South University studying in the CSE department.
Apparatus/Materials
A booklet with instructions and 50 questions was one of the materials utilized in this
psychological test. The booklet had two columns on each page. Each row in the left-hand column
had five figures in the right-hand column known as “Answer Figures,” and four figures in the
left- hand column known as “Problem Figures.” The participants had to mark their answers on an
answer sheet that had options ranging from A to E. The experimenter graded the tests using the
right answer key. The experimenter used a stopwatch application on a smartphone to keep track
of time. The participants marked their responses on the answer sheet with pen.
Description of DAT
Pearson’s Differential Aptitude tests for Personnel and Career Assessment, more commonly
known as the DAT for PCA, are usually a series of tests designed to measure one’s abilities in
different fields, used by employers to assess their future employees’ abilities. This is done in
consequence in decide who is adequate and suitable for their offered positions Under the DAT
are subjects: Verbal Reasoning, Numerical Reasoning Abstract Reasoning perceptual special and
accuracy,
Mechanical Reasoning Space Relations, Spelling and language usage. Recently in Bangladesh
Brac has included this kind of test in their job interview
In the current experiment, 50 questions of the Abstract Reasoning subtest were used. The
Abstract Reamming” subtest is predetermined to be am-verbal more of a person’s reaming
potential. It evaluates how a person can reason with geometric figures or designs. Each test item
is in a geometric sequence in which the composition changes according to the given rule. This
type of abstract reasoning is useful in progression or occupations that require the potential to see
the connection among the objects in terms of their size, shape, position, and quantity
The original forms (A and B) of DAT were angered in 1971 to provide a merged scientific and
well-in-order regulated procedure for measuring the potentials of boys and girls from grude
through 9, for the trots of education counting. The DAT test was reviewed and standardized in
1962 (L and N) and again in 1972 (S and T). The 1962 emendation of the test www managed
predominantly at making the text caner to direct and scom, through numerous changes in forms,
test length and culmination of formula scoring. The original objects, together with the new
component after revisions, were tried out experimentally on groups of high school Students in
the and 10th grades. Disparity and his values were calculated for each grade and sex following the
tests.
Validity of DAT
All the students of DAT were found to be highly valid and in particular abstract reasoning was
found to be the most consistent product of machinery course grades.
Amburst (1969) undertook an interesting investigation of the role of non-verbal ability in
predicting achievement for a sample of 118 first-year students for drafting Abstract reasoning
and space relation are also found to be well correlated with grades.
Stoughton (1955) reported that reasoning and space relation were useful for predicting
performance at the shop than performance in the general education courses. The predictive
validity of DAT is frequently demonstrated by its successful prediction of scores on standardized
achievement tests.
Reliability of DAT
The internal consistency coefficients for all the students range from 82 to 95, except for in
perception speed and accuracy. For most of the subjects, the reliability coefficients are in the
80s provided that the subjects have good temporal stability.
Practical Utility of DAT
DAT tests are used in many other places other than Junior or High School. It is used in
vocational counseling of Young adults and in also a selection of employees.
Scoring
Each correct answer was given and one point and one point was deducted for one wrong answer.
The total test was marked out of 50. The score depicts the total number of the correct answer
given by the participants.
Norms
The norms for the 8 Subtests of DAT were developed in terms of percentile. Norms were
separately derived for boys and girls from over 64,000 students in 76 public schools and
parochial schools in 33 states of the USA. The sampling was selected by two stages of the
sampling procedure to represent the entire USA population, starting from grade 7 to grade 12
with a diverse socio-economic level, scholastic aptitude, and ethnicity.
Procedure
The experiment was conducted in a proper manner. On Saturday morning the experimenter
invites or welcomes the participant to her psychology classroom. The participant is briefed about
the test procedure and instructions before the test begins. The participant was read an agreement
with his permission to participate in the experiment and was asked to read all the instructions. He
was then asked to sign the consent form. All information obtained from him will be kept
confidential and he has full right to withdraw from the examination at any time. If he has
anything to know about the examination, he can ask any question at any time. Participant names,
ages, gender, address, and educational qualification were collected.
The participant as well as the experimenter signed the consent form before the start of the
experiment. The examiner gave the participant the booklet, and the sample examples were
discussed by the examiner. The participant was then given the answer sheet, and the examiner
instructed him on how to mark the proper response with a pen. The participant had 25 minutes to
respond to 50 questions, and even if they were unable to finish in that time, they had to stop.
When everyone was prepared, the test started, and the examiner used a stopwatch app on a
smartphone to keep track of the passing time. Following the completion of the test, the
participant’s feedback was collected, and he was gratefully acknowledged for his willingness to
take part in and contribute to the test.
Data Analysis
The score for the abstract reasoning capacity of a normal adult was determined by counting the
total number of correct answers using the correct answer key. One participant received a score,
which was graded out of fifty.
Results
Below are the results
Abstract reasoning of the Raw Score Percentile
participant
Male 34 35
From the above Table, it can be seen that the raw score of the participant was 34. By referring to
the norms for Abstract Reasoning, the corresponding percentile value of the participant was 35.
Discussion
The purpose of the test was to assess a non-verbal measure of the adults reasoning ability and to
assess a measure of ability to deal with concrete materials through visualization for vocational
guidance and counseling.
It could be observed from this test that the participant scored 34 out of 50 and the corresponding
percentile value of the participant was 35. This 35 percentile is indicating the value (or score)
below which 35% of the observations may be found. It can be commented that the participant
scored better than 35% of all the test takers. It also indicates that 65% of participants scored the
same or better than him. The participant, being a student from a CSC background might not
experience these types of problems involving the identification of shapes and patterns before. It
might be one reason for not having the best cognitive thinking abilities and hence was not able to
think and process information faster than 65% of the participants who scored better than him. As
his abstract reasoning score is poor and he is a CSC student so he shouldn’t go for engineering
anymore. Because Computer programming is a logical profession if he goes for engineering he
will suffer. My recommendation for him is he should choose a business profession. Like, he can
be a good businessman or account officer/cash receiver.
A limitation of this psychological test was the presence of extraneous variables that might have
had an impact on the experiment's outcomes. The participants may have had anxiety about being
an unknown person in the lab. Since the laboratory space was not sufficiently soundproofed,
other outside factors like noise and disturbance may have had an impact on the test.
References
Fiengold, A. (1993, July). Cognitive gender differences: A developmental perspective. Retrieved
From Springerlink: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00289998
Lakin, J. (2013, July). Sex differences in reasoning abilities: Surprising evidence that male-
female ratios in the tails of the quantitative reasoning distribution have increased. Retrieved from
Research Gate: Sex differences in reasoning abilities: Surprising evidence that male-female.
Ratios in the tails of the quantitative reasoning distribution have increased Request PDF
(researchgate.net)
Differential Aptitude Test (2015, September 3). Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Retrieved from
https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures differential-aptitude-test 7 textThe
%20Differential%20Aptitude%20Tests%20(DAT to%20succeed
20in%20selected 20 Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in
mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
107(2), 139-155. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
Armbrust, R. (1969). An intelligence factors in beginning drafting success. (Doctoral)
Dissertation, Southern Illinois University) Dissertation Abstracts International, 2895.
Varrone, A., Dickson, J. C., Tossici-Bolt, L., Sera, T., Asenbaum, S., Booij, J… &
Nobili, F. (2013), European multicentre database of healthy controls for [1231] FPCIT SPECT
(ENC- DAT): age-related effects, gender differences and evaluation of different methods of
analysis. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 40(2), 213-227.
Appendix
The original pages are attached on the next page.