Bilingualism, Multilingualism and
Identity
M Jahidul Azad
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Prime University
“Bilingual”: what does it mean?
• ‘In this chapter I use the terms
“bilingualism” and “multilingualism”
interchangeably to refer to the routine
use of two or more languages in a
community’ (Romaine 385)
Defining communities
• Which communities do you belong to?
• At any given time a person’s identity is a
heterogeneous set made up of all the names or
identities, given to and taken up by her. (Tabouret-
Keller 316)
[…] individual identity and social identity are
mediated by language: Language features are the
link which binds individual and social identities
together (317)
Defining communities
• What is crucial […] to most definitions of
community is the sense of perceived
solidarity and interaction based on reference
to a particular language and the
relationships among people who identify
themselves as members of that community.
(Romaine 387)
Language and boundaries
• Language and the identities they carry
with them generally imply a boundary
marking function: The same identity
prevails where and as long as the same
language is spoken. Has this ever been
true? (Tabouret-Keller 319)
Linguistic minorities
• The label “minority” if often simply a
euphemism for non-elite or subordinate
groups, whether they constitute a
numerical majority or minority in
relation to some other group that is
politically and socially dominant
(Romaine 389)
Language legitimacy
Naming a language
reification and totemization of it
• Reification involves some body of doctrine (grammars,
lexicons, a literature)
• Totemization is the adoption of a language as one of the
defining social properties of a group. (Tabouret-Keller
318)
Why are people bilingual?
• Economic necessity
• Civil servants (administrative policies)
• Prestige (language of the educated such as Latin
and Greek)
• Religion
DIGLOSSIA: high and low variety; functional
specialization between languages (Romaine 393)
Accommodation theory
• Convergence and divergence (Giles in Tabouret-
Keller 322)
• Giles’ theory: people adjust their speech style to
be socially integrated into existing groups.
• Le Page’s theory: groups only exist in the minds of
individuals and speech acts are acts of projection
Identification process
(Tabouret-Keller 324)
• Not envisioned in the frame of a dual relationship
between A (groups) and B individuals but:
• Identification between A and B is possible only
insofar as these two have access to and are part of
C (= language as the foundation of human
condition)
Making sense means to depend on words
An English-speaking community?
• There are more speakers of English as a second
language than there are native English speakers
• Diglossia on an international scale
• Bilingual countries were created not to promote
bilingualism, but to guarantee the maintenance
and use of two or more languages in the same
nation (Romaine 398)
Closing debate
• Is linguistic diversity positive or
negative?
• How is it perceived?
Thank you