BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC.
CASE STUDY REPORT
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
Introduction
Blaine Kitchenware Inc. (BKI) is an American company that
produces kitchen appliances such as griddles, waffle iron, blenders,
and coffee makers among others. The company started operation
solely in the United States in 1927 but by 2006 it could only boast of
10% of the American market share for kitchen appliances. The 10%
market share does not accurately reflect the status of a company
that has been in existence for the past 80. Due to the rather
unimpressive market share, the company embarked on an
expansion strategy with the intension of going global. The global
expansion was not as successful as expected. This is evidenced by
the fact that available records in the year 2006 indicate that 65% of
the company’s sales were made to wholesalers and retailers in the
United States.
In this report, we will examine a proposal that was presented
to the CEO of the company Victor Dubinski. The proposal has a
potential to “unlock” the value inherent in Blaine’s strong operation
and balance sheet. The proposal is intended to convince Victor
Dubinski and the board on the advantages of repurchasing stock and
also borrowing to add to the excess cash that the company has to
pay for the stock. The CEO needs to present this proposal to the
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
board. The details of the proposal are analyzed in the problem
statement below.
Problem Statement
The major issues the company faced were with respect to its
conservative nature and the effect of their organization being biased
against borrowing to raise capital for projects. This left the company
having surplus cash (over liquid) and being unlevered.
The problem with this was that, such a structure did not seek
to support the interest of the company’s shareholders. As evidenced
by the reports, the company’s dividends per share had risen only
modestly in the two years leading to 2006. Its return on equity of
11% as at 2006 was well below the industrial average of 26%.
Another problem was that by maintaining high cash balances,
they became vulnerable to the reduction in the future value of that
cash and hence the organization’s overall value. Cash was not used
appropriately as it was majorly used to satisfy the extensive
acquisition habit the company practiced. This practice of acquisition
seriously increased the company’s number of shares outstanding
which subsequently had a negative impact on the shareholders.
Most alarming of all was the fact that if the company continued
with this structure, they would be susceptible to a forced acquisition
due to the increased number of shares outstanding coupled with
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
reduced value of stock. This, together with the feeble structure will
entice private equity buyers to easily buy out the shares of majority
of the shareholders. A situation that would be relatively difficult if
there was a reduced number of shareholders with great stakes in the
company.
ANALYSIS OF THE SHARE REPURCHASE PROPOSAL
If the company repurchased some of its outstanding shares
and takes on some debt, it will definitely result in a secured financial
state for both the shareholders that would be left after the
repurchase and the company. This is because it will be enjoying the
benefits of being levered which include increased share price since
there will be fewer shares outstanding with increased demand. Also,
the company will enjoy tax shield due to the fact that it has debt on
its books that it is servicing.
Items in the proposal include:
BKI to use $209 million of cash from its balance sheet and $50
million new debt at an interest rate of 6.75% to repurchase 14
million shares at $18.50 per share.
The proposal involves paying 13.8% premium to buy back
23.7% of its outstanding shares
This was also done with the use of the tender offer strategy of share
repurchase which entailed them buying some of their outstanding
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
shares currently in the market at a price above the current market
price.
Assumptions made in Analysis
In preparing the above Income statement for Blaine Kitchen, we
made several assumptions due to the fact that certain information
was not given in the case. The following assumptions were made
based on professional judgment:
(1)Assume that Cost of goods sold increased by the average of
the percentages of revenue of the three preceding years.
Therefore, the cost of goods sold for the after leverage is
71.5% of revenue.
(2)Assume that Selling, General & administrative (SG&A)
expenses also increased by the average of the percentages of
revenue for the three preceding years. Therefore, (SG&A) of
the after leverage is 8.6% of revenue.
(3)Assume that other income after leverage is 4.8% of revenue.
This is based on the average of the percentages of revenue of
the three previous years.
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
Impact on Balance Sheet
Assets: 2006 (‘000) After
Leverage(‘000’)
Cash & Cash Equivalents 66,557 21,866
Marketable Securities 164,309 -
Accounts Receivable 48,780 48,780
Inventory 54,874 54,874
Other Current Assets 5,157 5,158
Total Current Assets 339,678 130,678
Property, Plant & Equipment 174,321 174,321
Goodwill 38,281 38,281
Other Assets 39,973 39,973
Total Assets 592,253 383,253
Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity:
Accounts Payable 31,936 31,936
Accrued Liabilities 27,761 27,761
Taxes Payable 16,884 16,884
Total Current Liabilities 76,581 76,581
Other liabilities 4,814 4,814
Deferred Taxes 22,495 22,495
Debt - 50,000
Total Liabilities 103,890 153,890
Shareholders' Equity 488,363 229,363
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity 592,253 383,253
Is important to note that, as a result of the stock repurchase the
cash amd marketable securities on BKI’s balance sheet has reduced
significantly from $230,866,000 to $21,866,000. That
notwithstanding, BKI will be able to operate without any significant
issues. Another point worth noting is that BKI will now have a debt of
$50 million on its books. This debt will result in BKI paying interest
expense of 3,375,000 annually. However, this debt will provide BKI
the opportunity to enjoy tax shield because of the interest expense
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
that it has to pay. The effect of this financial structure is that it will
ensure that forced acquisition does not occur and also, shareholders
will enjoy higher earnings per share at a share price of $18.50,
which is significantly higher than the $16.25.
Impact on Income Statement
After
Operating Results: 2004 2005 2006 (‘000’)
Revenue 291,940 307,964 342,251 352519
Less: Cost of Goods Sold (71.5 % of revenue) 204,265 220,234 249,794 252051
Gross Profit 87,676 87,731 92,458 100,468
Less: Selling, General & Administrative (8.6 % of
revenue) 25,293 27,049 28,512 30,317
Operating Income 62,383 60,682 63,946 70,151
EBIT 62,383 60,682 63,946 70,151
Plus: Other Income (expense)(4.8% of Revenue) 15,719 16,057 13,506 16,921
Less: Interest on debt 0 0 0 3,375
Earnings Before Tax 78,102 76,739 77,452 90,447
Less: Taxes 24,989 24,303 23,821 36,179
Net Income 53,112 52,435 53,630 54,268
Net Income Margin 18.2% 17.0% 15.7% 15.4%
Gross margin 30.0% 28.5% 27.0% 28.5%
Note: The “After” column shows the resulting impacts of the share
repurchase.
Financial Ratios
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
After
Financial Ratios 2006 Leverage
Acid test 3.7 0.99
Current
Ratio 4.4 1.7
D/E ratio
(Solvency
) -24.06 21.8
Probability
EBIT 63946 70,151
Ratios
ROE 11.00% 22.00%
ROA 9.00% 13.00%
EPS $0.91 1.13
EBIT 63,946 70,151
Tax Shield
interest
payment 0 3,375
taxable
Income 63,946 90,447
tax 23,821 36,179
Net
income 53,630 54,268
WACC Estimations
Before proposal
Outstanding Share: 59,052,000
Stock price: $16.25
Market premium: 13.8%
Unlevered beta: 0.56
Cost of Equity:
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
Using CAPM: rf + bu (PMR)
5.02+0.56(13.8)
12.7480
Cost of Equity 12.75%
Since Blaine Kitchen has no debt at this time, its WACC is the same
as the cost of capital calculated above.
WACC = 0+1*12.75
WACC = 12.75%
After Proposal
The following is the situation of the firm after the proposal
rf = 5.02
Debt = 50,000,000
Equity = 229,363,000
Value =Debt + Equity =279,363,000
bu = 0.56
Weight of debt = 50,000,000/279,363,000 = 0.18
Weight of Equity = 229,363,000/279,363,000 = 0.82
Debt(D)/Equity(E) Ratio = 50,000,000/229,363,000 =0.22
Tax rate (T) = 40%.
To calculate the cost of equity after leverage, we employ the
Hamada equation
bL=bU[1+(1-T)(D/E)]
0.56[1+(1-0.40)(0.22)]
0.56*1.132
bL = 0.63
Therefore the levered beta is 0.63
Cost of equity after leverage is rf + bu (PMR)
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
5.02+0.63(13.8)
Cost of equity = 13.71
Cost of debt is 6.75%
Blaine kitchen’s levered WACC is calculated as follows:
= (0.18*6.75*0.6) + (0.82*13.71)
=0.7290 + 11.2422
WACC = 11.97%
Assumptions made in WACC computation:
1) Given that Blaine Kitchen has not issued debt in a very long
time and also having a strong balance sheet, it is safe to
assume that the cost of debt is the borrowing rate. This
assumption is based on the explanation provided by Ross et al.
in their book Corporate Finance: Core principles and
Applications. They reiterated on pages 378 and 379 that in
situations like the Blaine Kitchen case, the cost of debt is the
cost of borrowing. Therefore in the above calculation we chose
the borrowing rate of 6.75% as the cost of debt. Additionally,
we assumed that if Blaine Kitchen were to issue a bond,
because of its strong balance sheet, its bonds will be rated
AAA by Moody with rate of 5.88%. When the default spread of
0.86% is added to that rate of 5.88%, it will result in 6.74%.
This is only 0.05 percentage points from the borrowing rate
and therefore insignificant and immaterial for further
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
consideration. Based on the above, we chose the cost of debt
of 6.75%.
2) Given that Blaine Kitchen has a strong balance sheet and does
not like to take on debt, we assume that it will only take a
medium term debt of about 10 years. Therefore, we used the
risk free rate of 5.02%
3) rf= risk free rate
bu = unlevered beta
bL = Levered beta
PMR= Market risk premium.
Advantages of the Share Repurchase to Blaine Kitchenware
Share price of the company will increase as many people will
be chasing less stock. Additionally, the fact that shares
outstanding will be reduced will give both EPS and DPS a better
value.
There will be increased power and influence on the part of the
family (board of directors/owners) as their 62% power will
increase to about 81%.
The power that owners now have can help them develop their
own dividend policy to situate the company in a standard for
future dividend payments
By increasing shareholder value (share price), this program will
improve shareholder confidence.
Disadvantages of the Share Repurchase
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT
Utilizing the company’s cash will reduce the level of liquidity of
the company and inhibit its ability to make some capital
investments.
A crisis could erupt from minority shareholders as they would
feel cheated or left out with the implementation of this
program.
Less cash could also affect the ability of the company to meet
day-to-day transactions needed for operations.
Why Blaine Kitchenware Should Consider the Share Repurchase
WACC will reduce from 12.75% to 11.97% to show that an
optimal capital structure has been attained.
More influence for the majority stakeholders (the family) and
this will help fend off predators (i.e acquirers) from taking over
the company via shares.
Tax shield helps reduce costs of capital. This is an encouraging
reason for them to consider it now in order to enjoy the
benefits of this tax shield.
Recommendation
Based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis and the fact
that the pros of doing the share repurchase outweigh the cons, it is
only proper to recommend that this project be accepted and
implemented because it satisfies all parties involved (the company
and its shareholders) and the future financial and budgeting
capabilities of Blaine Kitchenware Inc.
BLAINE KITCHENWARE INC. CASE STUDY REPORT