Ebook Legal Imperialism - 11
Ebook Legal Imperialism - 11
http://ebooks.cambridge.org
Legal Imperialism
Turan Kayaolu
Chapter
A. Datasets
David Singer and Melvin Small. National Material Capabilities Dataset.
http://www.umich.edu/~cowproj/capabilities.html.
David J. Singer and Michael Wallace. Intergovernmental Organizations
Dataset. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cgi/archive.prl?study=5520.
205
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
206 Bibliography
FRUS. Foreign Relations of the United States. Various years and volumes.
Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
1924. “Treaty of Lausanne.” American Journal of International Law XVIII
(Supplement): 1–116.
1924. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
1925. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
1926. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
1931. The Civil Code of the Republic of China. Nanking.
1937–1943. China Handbook. New York: The Macmillan Company.
DBFP. 1972. Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–1939.
London: Majesty’s Stationary Office.
E 1528/1/44.1923. British Secretary’s Notes of Meeting Held in Lord
Curzon’s Room at the Beau Rivage Hotel, Lausanne (February 4, 1923).
London: National Archives.
Cmd. 1814. 1923. Records of Proceedings and Draft Terms of Peace.
Lausanne Conference on Near Eastern Affairs 1922–1923, Lausanne.
London: National Archives.
FO 371/10348. 1925. Memo: Outstanding Questions with Siam; Further
Correspondence Respecting the Affairs of Siam, 1908; and Further
Correspondence Respecting the Affairs of Siam, 1909. London: National
Archives.
FO 371/11646. 1926. China – Abolition of Extraterritoriality. London:
National Archives.
FO 371/11647. 1926. China – Abolition of Extraterritoriality. London:
National Archives.
FO 371/31657. 1942. Extraterritoriality – China 1942. London: National
Archives.
FO 371/31660. Extraterritoriality Negotiations. London: National Archives.
FO 371/35679. Extraterritoriality Negotiations. London: National Archives.
FO 676/64. Extraterritoriality. London: National Archives.
FO 881/4763. 1881–1882. Further Correspondence Respecting the
Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan 1881–1882.
London: National Archives.
FO 881/4778. 1883. Memorandum of Views of Her Majesty’s Government of
the Question of the Revision of Treaties with Japan. London: National
Archives.
FO 881/4938. 1883. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of
the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan, 1883. London: National
Archives.
FO 881/5072. 1894. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision
of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan. London: National
Archives.
FO 881/6317.1926. Extraterritoriality Commission. London: National
Archives.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 207
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
208 Bibliography
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 209
Borg, Dorothy. 1947. American Policy and the Chinese Revolution, 1925–
1928. New York: American Institute of Pacific Relations.
Bozkurt , Gülnihal. 1989. Gayrimüslim Osmanlı Vatandaşlarının Hukuki
Durumu [Legal Position of Non-Muslim Ottoman Citizens]. Ankara:
Türk Tarih Kurumu.
1998. Azınlık İmtiyazları-Kapütülasyonlardan Tek Hukuk Sistemine
Geçiş [from Minority Privileges and Capitulations to Uniform Legal
System]. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi.
Braude, Benjamin and Bernard Lewis, Eds. 1982. Christians and Jews
in the Ottoman Empire: The Functioning of a Plural Society. New
York: Holmes & Meier.
Bull, Hedley and Adam Watson. 1984. The Expansion of International
Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University
Press.
1979. “Natural Law and International Relations.” British Journal of
International Studies 5 (2): 171–181.
1996. “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” in J.
A. Vasquez (Ed.), Classics of International Relations. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall: 76–81.
Buzan, Barry. 1993. “From International System to International
Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English
School.” International Organization 47: 327–352.
Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of
Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Calder, Kent E. 2007. Embattled Garrisons. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Callahan, William A. 2004. “Nationalising International Theory: Race,
Class, and the English School.” Global Society 18(4): 305–323.
Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Chan, K. Chan. 1977. “The Abrogation of British Extraterritoriality in
China, 1942–1943.” Modern Asian Studies 11: 257–291.
Chang, Richard T. 1984. The Justice of the Western Consular Courts in
Nineteenth-Century Japan. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Chang, Seung Wha. 1992–1993. “Extraterritorial Application of U.S.
Antitrust Laws to Other Pacific Countries.” Hastings International and
Comparative Law Review 16: 295–320.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations
Theory.” World Politics 50 (2): 324–348.
Chen, Jianfu. 1999. Chinese Law: Towards an Understanding of Chinese
Law, Its Nature and Development. Boston: Kluwer Law International.
Ch’ien, Tuan-shãeng. 1950. The Government and Politics of China.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
210 Bibliography
Chiu, Hungdah. 1979 –1980. “The United States Status of Forces Agreement
with the Republic of China.” Boston College International and
Comparative Law Review 3: 67–88.
Churchill, Winston. 1929. The World Crisis 1918–1928: The Aftermath.
New York: Charles Scribner Sons.
Cin, Halil and Ahmet Akgündüz. 1989. Turk Hukuk Tarihi: Kamu Hukuku
[Turkish Legal History: Public Law]. Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi
Yayınları.
Clark, Harry L. 1999. “Dealing with U.S. Extraterritorial Sanctions and
Foreign Countermeasures.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of
International Economic Law 20 (1): 61–96.
Clifford, Nicholas R. 1991. Spoilt Children of Empire: Westerners in Shanghai
and the Chinese Revolution of the 1920s. Middlebury, VT: Middlebury
College Press.
Commission on Extraterritoriality. 1926. Report of the Commission on
Extraterritoriality. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Copeland, Dale C. 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School.” Review
of International Studies 29: 427–441.
Cotterrell, Roger. 1989. The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction
to Legal Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Curley, Tyler. 2009. “Social Identity Theory and EU Expansion.”
International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 647–666.
Dare, Philip Ned. 1975. John Bingham and Treaty Revision with Japan: 1873–
1885. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
Deudney, Daniel. 1996. “Binding Sovereigns: Authorities, Structures, and
Geopolitics in Philadelphian Systems,” in T. J. Biersteker and C. Weber
(Eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press: 190–239.
Dewey, John. 1894. “Austin’s Theory of Sovereignty.” Political Science
Quarterly 9 (1): 31–52.
Dixit, Avinash K. 2004. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of
Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Donnelly, Jack. 1986. “International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis.”
International Organization 40 (3): 599 –642.
1998. “Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?” International
Affairs 74 (1): 1–23.
2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Doyle, Michael. 1986. Empires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dunne, Tim. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English
School. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Dunne, Timothy. 1995. “The Social Construction of International Society.”
The European Journal of International Relations 1 (3): 367–389.
Duxbury, Neil. 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 211
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
212 Bibliography
Ganz, A. Harding. 1977. “German Navy in the Far East and Pacific: The
Seizure of Kiatschou and After,” in J. A. Moses and P. Kennedy
(Eds.), Germany in the Pacific and Far East 1870–1914. St. Lucia,
Queensland: Queensland University Press: 115–136.
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University
of California Press.
Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie
Slaugher. 2000. “Legalization and World Politics.” International
Organization 54 (3): 385–399.
2001. “Response to Finnemore and Toope.” International Organization
55 (3): 759 –760.
Gönen, Yasemin Saner. 2000. “The Judicial Privileges of Foreigners in the
Ottoman Empire,” in K. Ciçek, E. Kuran, N. Göyünc, and İ. Ortaylı
(Eds.), The Great Ottoman-Turkish Civilization. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye
(III): 676–688.
Gong, Gerrit. 1984. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Greif, Avner. 1993. “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in
Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition.” American Economic
Review 83 (3):525–548.
Griswold, Whitney A. 1938. Far Eastern Policy of the United States. New
York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Gross, Leo. 1948. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948.” American Journal
of International Law 42 (1): 20 –41.
Grundman, Rock. 1980. “The New Imperialism: Extraterritorial Application
of United States Law.” International Lawyer 14: 257–266.
Hall, Stephan. 2001. “The Persistent Spectre: Natural Law, International
Order and the Limits of Legal Positivism.” European Journal of
International Law 12 (2): 269 –307.
Hall, William Edward. 1894. Foreign Powers and Jurisdiction of the British
Crown. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. 2008. A Brief History of the Late Ottamon Empire. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. 2010. “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International
Relations Theory.” International Studies Review.
Hart, H. L. A. 1971. “Bentham’s Of Laws in General.” Cambrian Law
Review 2: 24–34.
Henderson, Dan Fenno. 1968. “Law and Political Modernization in
Japan,” in R. E. Ward (Ed.), Political Development in Modern Japan.
Princeton: Princeton University Press: 387–456.
Henkin, Louis, Richard Crawford Pugh, Oscar Schachter, and Hans Smit. 1993.
International Law: Cases and Materials. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Hertslet, Lewis. 1845. Treaties and Conventions Between Great Britain and
Foreign Powers. Volume VI. London: Henry Butterworth.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 213
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
214 Bibliography
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
John, Michael. 1989. Politics and Law in Late Nineteenth-Century
Germany: The Origins of Civil Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnston, W. Ross. 1973. Sovereignty and Protection: A Study of British
Jurisdictional Imperialism in the Late Nineteenth Century. Durham,
NC: Duke University Press.
Jones, Francis Clifford. 1931. Extraterritoriality in Japan and the Diplomatic
Relations Resulting in Its Abolition, 1853–1899. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Jung, Youngjin and Jun-Shik Hwang. 2002–2003. “Where Does Inequality
Come From? An Analysis of the Korea–United States Status of
Forces Agreement.” American University International Law Review
18: 1103–1142.
Jupille, Joseph and James A. Caporaso. 2009. “Domesticating
Discourses: European Law, English Judges, and Political Institutions.”
European Political Science Review 1 (2): 205–228.
Kahler, Miles. 1984. Decolonization in Britain and France: The Domestic
Consequences of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
2000. “Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case.” International
Organization 54 (3): 549 –572.
Kajima, Morinosuke. 1967. The Emergence of Japan as a World Power,
1895–1925. Rutland, VT: C. E. Tuttle Co.
Kamikawa, Hikomatsu. 1958. Japan-American Diplomatic Relations in the
Meiji-Taisho Era. Tokyo: Pan-Pacific Press.
Kasaba, Reat. 1988. The Ottoman Empire and World Economy: The
Nineteenth Century. Albany: SUNY Press.
Kayaoğlu, Turan. 2005. “Sovereignty, State-Building, and the Abolition of
Extraterritoriality.” Unpublished dissertation. University of Washington:
Seattle.
2007. “The Extension of Westphalian Sovereignty: State-Building and the
Abolition of Extraterritoriality.” International Studies Quarterly. (51)
3: 649 –676.
Keeton, G. W. 1969. The Development of Extraterritoriality in China. New
York: Howard Fertig.
Kennedy, David. 1997. “International Law and the Nineteenth Century:
History of an Illusion.” Quinnipiac Law Review 99: 112–113.
Kennedy, Paul M. 1977. “Germany and the Samoan Tridominium, 1889–
1898: A Study in Frustrated Imperialism,” in J. A. Moses and P. M.
Kennedy (Eds.), Germany in the Pacific and Far East, 1870–1914.
St. Lucia, Queensland: Queensland University Press: 88–114.
1986. The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery. London: Ashfield Press.
1987. The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. New York: Random House.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 215
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critiques. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Kim, Marie S. H. 2009. “Customary Law and Colonial Jurisprudence in
Korea.” American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (1): 205–247.
Kim, Won-Ki. 2003. “The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law
and Its Adoption in Korea.” Singapore Journal of International and
Comparative Law 7: 386 –411.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 2002. “Legal Positivism as Normative Politics:
International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive
International Law.” European Journal of International Law 13 (2):
401–436.
Kocabaşoğlu, Uygur. 2004. Majestelerinin Konsolosları [Majesty’s Consuls].
İstanbul: İletişim.
Koskenniemi, Martti. 1989. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of
International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing.
2004. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International
Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner, Stephan D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials
Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical
Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–246.
1985. Structural Confl ict: The Third World against Global Liberalism.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
1989. “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective,” in J. A. Caporaso
(Ed.), The Elusive State: International and Comparative Perspectives.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 69–96.
1993. “Westphalia and All That,” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O.
Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and
Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 235–264.
1995. “Compromising Westphalia.” International Security 20 (3):115–151.
1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
2001. “Organized Hypocrisy in Nineteenth-Century East Asia.”
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1: 173–197.
2004. “Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing
States.” International Security 29 (2): 85–120.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An
Inquiry into the Formation of the State-System.” World Politics
39: 27–52.
1995. “Sovereignty as ‘Dominium’: Is There a Right to Humanitarian
Intervention?” in M. Mastanduno and G. Lyons (Eds.), Beyond
Westphalia: National Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: 21–42.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
216 Bibliography
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 217
Marder, Arthur Jacob. 1940. The Anatomy of British Sea Power: A History
of British Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era, 1880–1905.
New York: A. A. Knopf.
MacDonald, Paul. 2004. “Networks of Domination: Social Ties and Imperial
Rule in International Politics,” unpublished manuscript.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.
New York: W. W. Norton.
Memorandum. 1922. The Capitulations: Memorandum Submitted on
Behalf of the Non-Offi cial British Community in Constantinople.
London: Page & Thomas Ltd.
Merryman, John Henry. 1969. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Midgley, E. B. F. 1975. The Natural Law and the Theory of International
Relations. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Milton, Philip. 1982. “David Hume and the Eighteenth-Century Conception
of Natural Law.” Legal Studies 2 (1): 14–34.
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. “Reading Habermas in Anarchy.” American Political
Science Review 99 (3): 401–417.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes.”
International Organization 54 (2): 217–252.
Moulder, Frances. 1977. Japan, China and the Modern World Economy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, Alexander B. 1996. “The Sovereign State System as Political-
Territorial Ideal,” in T. J. Biersteker and C. Weber (Eds.), State
Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press: 81–120.
Nicolson, Harold. 1974 [1934]. Curzon: The Last Phase 1919–1925.
New York: Howard Fertig.
Nish, Ian. 1968. The Story of Japan. London: Faber.
1998. The Iwakura Mission to America and Europe. London: Routledge.
Norman, Adam B. 1995–1996. “The Rape Controversy: Is a Revision
of the Status of Forces Agreement with Japan Necessary?” Indiana
International and Comparative Law Review 6 (3): 717–740.
North, Douglass C. and Robert Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World:
A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History.
New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
North, Douglass Cecil. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and
Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Arthur. 1954. A Concise History of the Law of Nations.
New York: Macmillan.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1998. The Republican Legacy in International
Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oppenheim , Lassa. 1908. “The Science of International Law: Its Task and
Method.” The American Journal of International Law 2 (2): 313–356.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
218 Bibliography
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 219
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
220 Bibliography
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
Bibliography 221
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012
222 Bibliography
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 130.133.8.114 on Sun Jan 29 18:31:27 GMT 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730252.008
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012