Solutions Manual
Solutions Manual
Foundations of Astrophysics
Barbara Ryden
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
Bradley M. Peterson
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
Jessica M. Orwig
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
Addison-Wesley
This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for
the use of instructors in teaching their courses and assessing student learning.
Dissemination or sale of any part of this work (including on the World Wide
Web) will destroy the integrity of the work and is not permitted. The work
and materials from it should never be made available to students except
by instructors using the accompanying text in their classes. All recipients
of this work are expected to abide by these restrictions and to honor
the intended pedagogical purposes and the needs of other instructors who rely
on these materials.
ISBN-13: 978-0-321-60313-5
ISBN-10: 0-321-60313-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley, 1301 Sansome St.,
San Francisco, CA 94111. All rights reserved. This publication is protected by Copyright and permission
should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval
system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
or likewise. To obtain permission(s) to use material from this work, please submit a written request to
Pearson Education, Inc., Permissions Department, 1900 E. Lake Ave., Glenview, IL 60025. For information
regarding permissions, call (847) 486-2635.
Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as
trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark
claim, the designations have been printed in initial caps or all caps.
ii
Preface
This manual provides complete solutions to the end-of-chapter exercises for
Foundations of Astrophysics by Barbara Ryden and Bradley M. Peterson, a
first course in astrophysics intended primarily for second-year majors in the
physical sciences. SI units, augmented when necessary by various units peculiar
to astronomy, are used throughout. In the written solutions, units are given
whenever they may not be obvious.
Although most of the problems in this book have been heavily field-tested
over the years, no doubt some errors, both typographical and conceptual, have
eluded our scrutiny. The authors would be pleased to learn of any errors in the
textbook or this solutions manual.
This solutions manual is intended to be an evolving document since it is
expected to be made available only to instructors via a secure website. It will
therefore be updated regularly by the authors, and the revision history will be
recorded at the end. Also at the end of this manual will be a list of known errors
found in the textbook itself.
We thank Catherine J. Grier for her help in proofreading this manual.
1 Early Astronomy 1
3 Orbital Mechanics 13
7 The Sun 43
10 The Planets 61
13 Properties of Stars 79
14 Stellar Atmospheres 87
15 Stellar Interiors 91
iii
20 Galaxies 123
23 Cosmology 139
Early Astronomy
1.2. For what range of latitudes are all the stars of the Big Dipper
circumpolar? Use the stars in the following table:
For all the stars to be circumpolar, the southernmost star (Alkaid) must be
above the horizon at lower transit, as shown in Figure 1.1. Thus the elevation
of the North Celestial Pole must be equal to the angle between Alkaid and the
Figure 1.1: Southernmost latitude from which all the stars of the Big Dipper
will be circumpolar.
NCP; the elevation is = 90o − δAlkaid = 90o − 49o 19 = 40o 41 . Only for
observers at this latitude or higher will all the Big Dipper stars be circumpolar.
What is the southernmost latitude from which all of the stars of the
Big Dipper can be seen?
For all the stars to be visible, the northernmost star (Dubhe) must be at the
horizon at upper transit, as shown in Figure 1.2. In other words, the NCP is
below the horizon by an angle equal to the separation between the NCP and
Dubhe, i.e., 90o − δDubhe = . Thus = δDubhe − 90o = 61o 45 − 90o = −28o 15 .
Only observers at or north of latitude −28o 15 can see all the stars of the Big
Dipper.
Figure 1.2: Southernmost latitude from which all the stars of the Big Dipper
can be seen.
For what range of latitudes are none of the stars of the Big Dipper
ever seen above the horizon?
For all of the stars to be below the horizon, the southernmost star must be on the
horizon at upper transit, as shown in Figure 1.3. In other words, the NCP must
be below the horizon by an angle equal to the distance between the NCP and
Alkaid, i.e., 90o − δAlkaid = − or = δAlkaid − 90o = 49o 19 − 90o = −40o41 .
Observers south of this latitude cannot observe any of the stars of the Big
Dipper.
Figure 1.3: Northernmost latitude from which none of the stars of the Big
Dipper can be seen.
1.3. Columbus, Ohio, is in the Eastern Time Zone, for which the civil
time is equal to the mean solar time along the 75o W meridian of
longitude.
(a) Ignoring daylight saving time for the moment, are there any days
of the year when civil noon (as shown by a clock) is the same as
apparent local noon (as shown by the Sun) in the city of Columbus?
If so, what day or days are they?
The longitude of Columbus is 82o 59 west. The zone time is set to longitude
75o , so Columbus is behind the zone time by
12h 60m
82 59 − 75 = 7 59
o o o
= 0.53 h
= 31.9m.
180o 1h
Since the amplitude of the Equation of Time is only ∼ 18m, the Sun never
transits the meridian at local noon in Columbus, it always transits ∼ 14m to
50m after noon, zone time.
(b) Daylight savings time advances the clock by one hour from the
second Sunday in March to the first Sunday in November (“Spring
forward, fall back”). When daylight savings time is in effect, are there
any days of the year when civil noon is the same as apparent local
noon in the city of Columbus? If so, what day or days are they?
Since the zone time is advanced an hour, the problem is made worse by daylight
savings time. During DST, the Sun crosses the meridian more than an hour
after noon, zone time.
1.5. In The Old Man and the Sea, Hemingway described the old man
lying in his boat off the coast of Cuba, looking up at the sky just
after sunset: “It was dark now as it becomes dark quickly after the
Sun sets in September. He lay against the worn wood of the bow
and rested all that he could. The first stars were out. He did not
know the name of Rigel but he saw it and knew soon they would
all be out and he would have all his distant friends.” Explain what
is astronomically incorrect about this passage. [Hint: what are the
celestial coordinates of the star Rigel?]
The right ascension of Rigel is α ∼ 6h and its declination is δ ∼ −8o , so it is
not circumpolar seen from Cuba. In September, the Sun is at α ∼ 12h , so at
sunset, α ∼ 18h is on the meridian. Rigel is thus near the nadir at this time.
1.6. (a) Consider two points on the Earth’s surface that are separated
by 1 arcsecond as seen from the center of the (assumed to be trans-
parent) Earth. What is the physical distance between the two points?
rad 103 m
d = θR = 1 × × 6378 km × ∼ 31 m
206265 km
(b) Consider two points on the Earth’s equator that are separated by
one second of time. What is the physical distance between the two
points?
1hr 360o π rad
θ = 1 sec × × × = 7.27 × 10−5 rad
3600 sec 24h 180o
1.7. The bright star Mintaka (also known as δ Orionis, the western-
most star of Orion’s belt) is extremely close to the celestial equa-
tor. Amateur astronomers can determine the field of view of their
telescope (that is the angular width of the region that they can see
through the telescope) by timing how long it takes Mintaka to drift
through the field of view when the telescope is held stationary in hour
angle. How long does it take Mintaka to drift through a 1 degree field
of view?
The sky appears to rotate westward at the sidereal rate
360o 15o
ω= = .
24 sidereal hrs sidereal hr
The time it takes to rotate through an angle θ is
θ 1o 60m
t= = o −1 × = 4 sidereal minutes
ω 15 hr 1 hr
In terms of mean solar time,
30
20
10
Declination
−10
−20
−30
−20 −10 0 10 20
Equation of time
Figure 1.4: The part of the Earth’s analemma that is attributable only to the
eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit. The part due to obliquity has been removed.
(b) Now imagine the aliens have restored the axial tilt to its previous
value of 23o.5, but that they have changed the Earth’s orbit so that
it is a perfect circle, with the Earth’s orbital speed being perfectly
constant over the course of a year. Sketch the analemma in this case.
30
20
10
Declination
0
−10
−20
−30
−20 −10 0 10 20
Equation of time
Figure 1.5: The part of the Earth’s analemma that is attributable only to the
obliquity of the ecliptic. The part due to eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit has
been removed.
30
20
10
Declination
−10
−20
−30
−20 −10 0 10 20
Equation of time
(c) The martian analemma is shown in Figure 1.15. What is the tilt
of the rotation axis of Mars?
Inspection of the amplitude of the analemma shows that the inclination of Mars
must be ∼ 24o relative to its orbital plane.
1.9. How many square degrees are on the complete celestial sphere?
There are 180o per π radians, so there are 1802 square degrees in π 2 steradians.
Thus, the surface area of the sky in steradians is
2
180◦
A= × 4π steradians = 41, 253 square degrees
π rad
Emergence of Modern
Astronomy
2.1. Over the course of the year, which gets more hours of daylight,
the Earth’s north pole or south pole? [Hint: The Earth is at perihe-
lion in January.]
The Earth is at perihelion in January, so its northern hemisphere winter is
shorter, and its southern hemisphere summer is shorter. Consequently, summed
over a year, the north pole gets more light.
2.2. On 2003 August 27, Mars was in opposition as seen from the
Earth. On 2005 July 14 (687 days later), Mars was in western quadra-
ture as seen from the Earth. What was the distance of Mars from
the Sun on these dates, measured in astronomical units (AU)? Is this
greater than or less than the semimajor axis length of the Martian
orbit? You may assume the Earth’s orbit is a perfect circle. [Hint:
The sidereal period of Mars is also 687 days.]
The number of orbits Earth makes in 687 days is
687 days
Norbit = = 1.881 orbits.
365.24 days per orbit
The angle swept out by the Earth in 0.881 orbits is φ = (0.881)(360o) = 317o.14.
As per the left diagram in Figure 2.1, θ is the angle between the Earth and Mars
as seen from the Sun and is θ = 360o − φ = 42o.86. Simple trigonometry (right
diagram in Figure 2.1) gives the distance of Mars from the Sun,
a 1 AU
c= = = 1.36 AU,
cos θ 0.733
which is less than the length of the semimajor axis of the orbit of Mars. This
tells us that the orbit of Mars cannot be circular.
Figure 2.1: When Earth is at point 1 in the left diagram, Mars is at opposition.
After one orbit, Mars returns to the same position and Earth is now at point
2, where Mars appears to be at western quadrature; during this time, Earth
has swept out an angle 360o + φ, and θ = 360o − φ. The triangle from the left
diagram is expanded on the right, where a is the Earth–Sun distance, c is the
Mars–Sun distance, and b is the Earth–Mars distance when Mars is at western
quadrature.
[Aside: In the next Chapter, we introduce the perihelion distance q = a(1 − e).
In the case of Mars, the perihelion distance is is q = (1 − e)a = 1.524 AU(1 −
0.093) = 1.382 AU, which is less than the distance of Mars from the Sun on the
specified dates. This small error occurs on account of assuming that the Earth’s
orbit is circular, which it is not.]
2.3. In the 1670s, the astronomer Ole Roemer observed eclipses of the
Galilean satellite Io as it plunged through Juptier’s shadow once per
orbit. He noticed that the time between observed eclipses became
shorter as Jupiter came closer to the Earth and longer as Jupiter
moved away. Roemer calculated that the eclipses were observed 17
minutes earlier when Jupiter was in opposition than when it was close
to conjunction. This was attributed by Roemer to the finite speed
of light. From Roemer’s data, compute the speed of light, first in
AU min−1, then in m s−1 .
The difference in Jupiter’s distance from Earth during opposition and conjunc-
tion is simply the diameter of the Earth’s orbit, D = 2 AU. The speed of light
is thus c = 2 AU/17 min = 0.118 AU/min. In SI units, this becomes
ωp = ω
E + ω
s,
1 1 1 1 1
= + = + ,
S Pp PE 1.48 1
or S = 0.597 yr.
As seen from Mars (see Figure 2.3), −ωs = −ωp − ωMars . Using the sidereal
period of Mars PMars = (1.54)3/2 = 1.91 years, we solve for the synodic period
of the planet using
1 1 1 1 1
= + = +
S Pp PMars 1.48 1.91
and find that S = 0.833 yr = 305 days.
Figure 2.2: Angular speeds of Earth (ωE ) and the “wrong-way planet” (ωp ) in
the sidereal reference frame, and the angular speed of the planet in a reference
frame that co-rotates with the Earth–Sun line (ωs ).
Figure 2.3: Angular speeds of Mars (ωM ) and the “wrong-way planet” (ωp ) in
the sidereal reference frame, and the angular speed of the planet in a reference
frame that co-rotates with the Mars–Sun line (ωs ).
The ball will be deflected to the right in the northern hemisphere, by an amount
1
Δd ≈ a(Δt)2 ,
2
where Δt is the time of flight, given by Δt = D/v. Thus,
2
1 D D2 ω sin
d= (2vω sin ) 2
= .
2 v v
Orbital Mechanics
3.1. Comet Hale–Bopp has an orbit about the Sun with eccentric-
ity e=0.9951 and semimajor axis length a = 186.5 AU. What is the
sidereal orbital period of Comet Hale–Bopp? What is Comet Hale–
Bopps’s distance from the Sun at perihelion? What is its distance
from the Sun at aphelion? Comet Hale–Bopp passed through peri-
helion in 1997 April 1; did the previous perihelion passage of Comet
Hale–Bopp occur before or after the birth of Aristotle?
Use Kepler’s Third Law (equation 2.17), which gives the relation between an
object’s orbital period and semimajor axis. Calculate the sidereal orbital period:
3.2. The asteroid Eros is seen in opposition from the Earth once every
847 days. What is the sidereal orbital period of Eros? What is the
length a of the semimajor axis of Eros’ orbit? The eccentricity of the
orbit of Eros is e = 0.223; does Eros ever come within 1 AU of the
Sun?
Eros has an orbit larger than that of the Earth so we can use equation (2.10)
to calculate its sidereal orbital period:
1 1 1
= − ,
Pp PE S
13
where PE is the sidereal period for Earth, Pp is the synodic period for Eros1,
and S is the synodic period of Eros. The sidereal orbital period of Eros is
−1
1 1
Pp = − days = 642.1 days.
365.2 847
Use Kepler’s third law (equation 2.17) to determine the semimajor axis of the
orbit of Eros,
2/3
642.1
a = P 2/3 = = (1.76)2/3 = 1.46 AU.
365.24
equation (2.8).
3.4. What is the orbital period of a low-lunar orbit (as was used by
the Apollo command modules)?
This is similar to the previous problem, only replace the mass and radius of the
Earth with, respectively, the mass and radius of the Moon.
2 3 1/2
4π RMoon 3h
P = 1+
GMMoon 2RMoon
1/2
4π 2 (1.738 × 106 )3 3h
= 1 +
6.67 × 10−11 × 7.16 × 1022 2RMoon
3h
= 6600 1 + s.
2RMoon
A typical Apollo orbit was at an altitude h ≈ 100 km, where
3(100)
P = 6600 1 + ≈ 7200 s ≈ 2 hr.
2(1738)
(b) Phobos is the inner moon of Mars. The orbital period of Phobos
is P = 0.32 days; the semimajor axis of its orbit is a = 9370 km. Find
the mass of Mars. [You may assume the masses of Io and Phobos are
negligible compared to those of their parent planets.]
As in part (a),
4π 2 3
M = a
P 2G
4π 2 (9.37 × 106 )3
=
(0.32 × 86400)2 6.67 × 10−11
= 6.37 × 1023 kg.
In units of Earth radii, this is (4.1 × 104)/(6.378 × 103) = 6.5R⊕ . From equation
(3.74), the orbital speed is
x2 y2
+ = 1.
a2 b2
Equation (3.42) is
a(1 − e2 )
r= .
1 + e cos θ
From Figure 3.9 in the text, we obtain the lengths of r and r as
r2 = (x + ae)2 + y 2
r2 = (x − ae)2 + y 2 .
Subtracting the second equation from the first yields
Setting the two equations for r2 equal to each other yields, after simplifying,
r = a − ex. Squaring this gives
r2 = a2 − 2aex + e2 x2 .
Now setting the two equations for r2 equal to each other gives
x2 − 2aex + a2 e2 + y 2 = a2 − 2aex + e2 x2 .
Rearrangment yields
x2 (1 − e2 ) + y 2 = a2 (1 − e2 ).
x2 y2
2
+ 2 = 1.
a b
with C = 84.5 min. The orbital period (in minutes) for HST is thus
3(600)
P = 84.5 1 + = 96.3 min.
2(6378)
R⊕ 1
cos θ = = .
R⊕ + h 1 + (h/R⊕ )
Figure 3.1: The observer, at the top of the smaller circle that represents the
Earth, sees HST at the zenith at an altitude h. HST travels a segment of its
orbit s from the zenith to when it crosses the observer’s horizon. Caution: orbit
and Earth not to scale.
Expressing this in terms of sine,
−2 1/2
1/2 h
sin θ = 1 − cos θ 2
= 1− 1+ .
R⊕
The fraction of the orbit for which HST is above the horizon is
1/2
t 2s 1 2h
= = .
P 2π(R⊕ + h) π R⊕
For an altitude h = 600 km, the time HST is above the horizon is
We then use equation (3.67) to solve for the perigee velocity of the transfer orbit
2 1
v 2 = GM − .
r a
We must first calculate a for the Hohmann transfer orbit by using equation
(3.72),
a1 + a 2
at = ,
2
where a1 is the initial low-Earth orbit and a2 is the final geosynchronous orbit,
which from problem 3.6 we know is a2 = 41, 440 km. Thus,
6678 + 41440
at = = 2.406 × 104 km = 2.406 × 107 m.
2
At perigee of the transfer orbit, r = 6678 km, so
1/2
vpe = 6.67 × 10−11 5.9742 × 1024
1/2
2 1
× −
6.678 × 106 2.406 × 107
= 1.014 × 104 m s−1 = 10.14 km s−1 .
At the apogee (r = 41, 440 km) of the transfer orbit, equation (3.67) yields
1/2
2 1
vap = 6.67 × 10−11 5.9742 × 1024 −
4.144 × 10 7 2.406 × 107
= 1.64 × 103 m s−1 = 1.64 km s−1 .
The time required for the transfer is half the orbital period of the transfer orbit
t = PTO /2, where
1/2 1/2
4π 2 3 4π 2
PTO = a = (2.406 × 107 )3
GM (6.67 × 10−11 )(5.97 × 1024 )
= 3.71 × 104 s.
The transfer time is thus t = (3.71 × 104 /2) s = 1.86 × 104 s ≈ 5.1 hr.
where in the last step we note that e ≥ 0 by definition. We now use equation
(3.34),
L2 1
R= .
GM m2 (1 + e cos θ)
At perigee, q = a(1 − e) at cos θ = 1, so we have
L2
a(1 − e) = .
GM m2 (1 + e)
We can combine this with our equation for the angular momentum to obtain
L20 GM m2 R
= =R
GM m2 GM m2
so that
α2 R
a= .
1 − e2
Since e = α2 − 1, e2 = (α2 − 1)2 , and thus
so we have
α2 R R
a= = .
(2 − α )α
2 2 2 − α2
The semiminor axis of the orbit is b2 = a2 (1 − e2 ) so
R
2 1/2 αR
b = a(1 − e2 )1/2 = α (2 − α2 ) = .
(2 − α )
2 (2 − α2 )1/2
(2 − α2 )
q = a(1 − e) = a(1 − α2 + 1) = a(2 − α2 ) = R = R,
2 − α2
√
as expected. A sanity check is to note that as α → 2 (i.e., escape velocity),
Q, a, and b all approach infinity.
4.1. What is the largest angular distance possible between the center
of the Moon’s disk and the ecliptic? What is the largest distance pos-
sible between the center of the Moon’s disk and the celestial equator?
(Give your answers to the nearest tenth of a degree.)
The Moon’s orbital inclination is 5o.1 to the ecliptic so the maximum distance
from the ecliptic is 5o.1.
The largest distance from the celestial equator is 5o.1 + 23o.5 = 28o.6, where
23o.5 is the axial tilt of the Earth.
4.2. How close to the Sun could the planet Jupiter come without
suffering tidal disruption?
The density of the Sun is
3M 3 × 2 × 1030
ρ = = = 1.41 kg m−3 .
3
4πR 4π(6.96 × 108 )2
3 × 1.9 × 1027
ρJup = = 1.25 kg m−3 .
4π(7.14 × 107 )3
23
ΔFMars MMars r0 3
= ,
ΔFMoon MMoon d
where the Earth–Moon distance is r0 = 3.84 × 105 km and the distance to Mars
at opposition is 0.52 AU × 1.49 × 108 km AU−1 = 7.78 × 107 km.
3
ΔFMars 0.107 3.84 × 105
= = 1.1 × 10−6 .
ΔFMoon 0.012 7.78 × 107
Repeat this procedure for Jupiter relative to the Moon. The distance to Jupiter
at opposition is d = 4.2 AU × 1.496 × 108 km AU−1 = 6.28 × 108 km.
3
ΔFJupiter 318 3.84 × 105
= = 6.0 × 10−6 .
ΔFMoon 0.012 6.28 × 108
GMm
ΔF = mR⊕ (ı̂2 cos θ − ĵ sin θ).
ro3
GM
ΔF = mR⊕ (ı̂2 cos θ − ĵ sin θ).
a3⊕
At spring tide θ = 0o for both the Moon and Sun. The differential tidal force
at spring tide is the differential force from the Moon and the Sun,
Equation (4.10) gives the ratio of the differential forces due to the Sun and the
Moon,
ΔF
= 0.44.
ΔFMoon
We can use the Sun–Moon ratio to simplify the calculation to
GMm
ΔFspring = mR⊕ (2 + 2(0.44)) .
r03
4.6. Given the amplitudes of lunar librations given in the text, demon-
strate that over time 59% of the lunar surface can be seen from the
Earth.
Total area visible from earth is the sum of (1) the visible hemisphere of area
2πR2 , (2) a lune of angular width θdiurnal on the east and west limbs for diurnal
libration, (3) a lune of angular width θlongitude on the east and west limbs for
libration in longitude, and (4) a lune of angular width θlatitude on the north and
south limbs for libration in latitude.
Using the numbers in the text,
θdiurnal = 1o = 0.0056π rad
θlongitude = 6o = 0.0333π rad
θlatitude = 6o.5 = 0.0361π rad
The surface area of a lune is Σ = 2R2 θ (sanity check: for a full sphere, θ = 2π
so the surface area of a sphere is 4πR2 ). The total area of all the lunes is thus
dProt
= 0.0016 s century−1
dt
and since Δt = 5.48 × 108 yr = 5.48 × 106 century, we have
Pthen = 86, 400 s − 1.6 × 10−3 s century−1 × 5.48 × 106 century = 77, 632 s,
4.8. The earth will be in synchronous rotation with the Moon once
its rotation period has increased to 47 days.
(a) How far away will the Moon be from the Earth when this happens?
From equation (3.52), the semimajor axis of the Moon’s orbit with a period of
47 days (4.06 × 106 sec) is
2 1/3
P
a = GM⊕
2π
2 1/3
4.06 × 106
= × 6.67 × 10−11 × 5.97 × 1024
2π
= 5.50 × 108 m,
4.9. Standing at the Kennedy Space Center (latitude 28o N), you
notice the third quarter Moon at your zenith.
a) Approximately what time of day is it?
If the third quarter Moon is at the zenith, then it must be around sunrise.
(b) Approximately what time of year is it?
The farthest north the Moon can get is declination δmax = 23o.5 + 5o.1 = 28o.6,
where 23o.5 is the inclination of the Earth’s equator to the ecliptic and 5o.1 is
the Moon’s inclination to the ecliptic. Thus the Moon is close to as far north as
it can get. If the third-quarter Moon is at its northernmost point, it is close to
the summer solstice; the Sun, then, must be near the equator, heading south.
So the time of year is around the autumnal equinox, the end of September.
(c) Half a synodic month later, what will be the altitude of the first
quarter Moon when it makes its upper transit?
If the Moon is at declination δ = +28o , then in two weeks, half an orbit later, it
will be at declination δ = −28o . Its elevation from Kennedy Space Center will
be (see Figure 4.1)
θ = 90o − 2(28o ) = 34o
above the southern horizon.
Figure 4.1: If the Moon passes through the zenith Z, in two weeks, its elevation
above the southern horizon will be θ.
The Interaction of
Radiation and Matter
29
1 (jh̄)2 j 2 h̄
Erot = 2 = .
2 (M r0 /2) M r02
3(1.05 × 10−34 )2
ΔE = ≈ 2 × 10−21 J ≈ 1.2 × 10−2 eV.
(1.67 × 10−27 )(10−10 )2
The wavelength associated with this transition is
2χ 2 × 8.16 × 10−19
T = = = 3.9 × 104 K.
3k 3 × 1.38 × 10−23
Δλ
v 2 1/2
∼ ≈ 2.2 × 10−3 .
λ c
5.6. For the Planck function Iμ (T ) (see equation 5.86), what is the
most probable frequency νp at a given temperature T ? For the Planck
function expressed as a function of wavelength, Iλ (T ) (see equation
5.90), what is the most probable wavelength λp at a given tempera-
ture T ? For what range of temperatures does λp fall in the visible
range of the electromagnetic spectrum?
2hν 3 1 2h
Jν (T ) = = 2 ν 3 [exp (hν/kT ) − 1]−1 .
c exp (hν/kT ) − 1
2 c
To find the maximum of this function, differentiate with respect to ν and set it
equal to zero, i.e.,
dJ 2hν 3 −2 h
= (−1) (exp (hν/kT ) − 1) exp (hν/kT )
dν c2 kT
2h −1
+ 2 3ν 2 (exp (hν/kT ) − 1) = 0.
c
Moving the first term to the right-hand side of the equation,
hν 3 exp (hν/kT )
3ν 2 (exp (hν/kT ) − 1)−1 = .
kT (exp (hν/kT ) − 1)2
To simplify this, let x = hν/kT , so this becomes 3(1 − e−x ) = x, which can be
solved numerically, graphically, or by trial-and-error. The solution is xmax =
2.821, so
Carrying out the same exercise in wavelength units, we start with equation
(5.90),
2hc2 1 −1
Jλ = = 2hc2 λ−5 (exp (hc/λkT ) − 1) .
λ5 exp (hc/λkT ) − 1
Differentiating this with respect to λ and setting the result equal to zero yields
dJλ
−1
= 2hc2 −5λ−6 (exp (hc/λkT ) − 1)
dλ
−5 −2 −hc
−λ (exp (hc/λkT ) − 1) exp (hc/λkT ) = 0.
kT λ−2
Rearranging,
5 1 hc exp (hc/λkT )
= .
λ6 exp (hc/λkT ) − 1 kT λ7 (exp (hc/λkT ) − 1)2
hc 1
5= .
kT λ 1 − exp(hc/kT λ)
−1
Again with a simple substitution, x = hc/kT λ, we have 5 = x (1 − e−x ) . The
solution to this is xmax = 4.965, so
5.7. A slab of glass 0.2 meters thick absorbs 50% of the light passing
through it. How thick must a slab of identical glass be in order to
absorb 90% of the light passing through it? How thick must it be to
absorb 99% of the light? How thick to absorb 99.9% of the light?
Start with the equation of radiative transfer, I = I0 e−nσx . Given that I(x)/I0 =
0.5 for x = 0.2 m, we compute nσ from
I
ln = −nσx.
I0
− ln (I/I0 ) − ln(0.5)
nσ = = = 3.466 m−1.
x 0.2
Thus, if 90% of the light is absorbed, I/I0 = 0.10 and
− ln I/I0
x= = 0.664 m.
3.466
For 99% absorption, I/I0 = 0.01 and x = 1.329 m. For 99.9% absorption,
I/I0 = 0.001 and x = 1.993 m.
L 60
l = =
σT 4 πd (5.67 × 10−8 )(2.9 × 103 )4 π × 4.6 × 10−5
0.1 m ≈ 10 cm.
We note that the filament is usually in the form of a helix so that it fits neatly
inside the bulb.
∞ ∞
dν
ϕ(ν)dν = c .
0 [(ν − ν0 )2 + (Γ/4π)2 ]
0
Now let x = ν − ν0 , so dx = dν. Consider the limits of the integral: at ν = 0,
x → −∞ and at ν = ∞, x = ∞. To simplify, let Γ/4π = b. Then
∞ ∞ π
dx
ϕ(ν)dν = c 2 2
=c = 1.
0 −∞ x + b b
This implies that c = b/π = Γ/4π 2 , so the correct form of the function is
Γ/4π 2
ϕ(ν)dν = .
[(ν − ν0 )2 + (Γ/4π)2 ]
5.10. Show that for an ensemble of particles with temperature T and
particle mass μmp , the line profile from thermal Doppler broadening
will be
c μmp μmp c2 (ν − νo )2
φ(ν)dν = exp − dν,
νo 2πkT 2kT νo2
where ν0 is the frequency at the line center.
The line-of-sight velocity disperison is σz2 = kT /μmp , and the line profile for
thermal broadening is a Gaussian, i.e., ϕ(v) ∝ exp(−v 2 /2σz2 ). Using the Doppler
formula,
Δν ν − ν0 v
= = ,
ν0 ν0 c
which implies that v 2 = c2 (ν − ν0 )2 /ν02 . Let x = ν − ν0 as in problem 5.9, so
∞ ∞ 2 2
−c x
ϕ(ν)dν = C exp dx.
0 −∞ 2ν02 σz2
To simplify, let a2 = 2ν02 σz2 /c2 so that
∞ 2
−x √
C exp 2
dx = Ca π = 1,
−∞ a
which implies that
1/2
1 c2 c μmp 1/2
C= √ = 2 2
= .
πa2 2πν0 σz ν0 2πkT
Thus,
c μmp 1/2 −μmp c2 (ν − ν0 )2
ϕ(ν)dν = exp dν.
ν0 2πkT 2kT ν02
Astronomical Detection of
Light
(5 × 10−7 )
θ = (206265)(1.2) = 15.5.
8 × 10−3
At inferior conjunction, the distance of Venus is d = 1 − 0.72 AU, so its angular
diameter is
D 2R 2 × 6.05 × 103 km
θ(rad) = = = = 2.88 × 10−4 ,
d d (1 − 0.72) × 1.5 × 108 km
6.2. (a) The Hiltner Telescope at the MDM Observatory (on Kitt
Peak, Arizona) has an aperature D = 2.4 m. Its Cassegrain focus has
an f-number f /7. What is the focal length F and plate scale s?
(b) The Mayall Telescope at the Kitt Peak National Observatory (also
37
10−3 mm
p = 58.9 mm−1 × 10μm pixel−1 × = 0.59 pixel−1 .
μm
(b) What is the area (in square arcminutes) of the sky that is imaged
on the entire chip? Would the image of the full Moon fit into the
chip?
The projected angular size of the CCD is = 1024 pixels × 0.59 pixel−1 =
602 ≈ 10 . The projected solid angle covered by the detector is thus A = 2 =
100 square arcminutes. The full Moon has an angular diameter of about 30 ,
which is about three times larger than the detector field of view.
(c) How many separate exposures would be required to cover the
entire celestial sphere (4π) steradians)?
The surface area of the celestial sphere is 4π steradians, or
2
180o
Σ = 4π × = 41, 253 square degrees.
π radians
The area covered by each exposure is
100 sq. arcmin
A= = 2.78 × 10−2 sq. degrees.
(60 arcmin/degree)2
The number of exposures it would take to cover the entire celestial sphere is
thus
4.12 × 104
N= = 1.58 × 106 exposures.
2.78 × 10−2
6.5. Suppose that you want to see stars that are as faint as possible
in the background-limited case. The Astronomy Fairy gives you a
choice: either she can increase the quantum efficiency of your retina
from q = 0.1 to q = 1, or she can double the maximum pupil size
of your eye while guaranteeing diffraction-limited angular resolution.
Which of these choices would produce a lower limiting flux Fλ ? Ex-
plain your choice.
This a background limited case so
1/2
θ Sλ
Flimit ∝ .
D q
Option
√ 1; Change q ≈ 0.1 to q = 1 decreases the limiting flux by a factor
10 ≈ 3.
Option 2: θ ∼ D−1 in the diffraction limit. So doubling D also decreases θ by
a factor of two, so the ratio θ/D decreases by a factor of 4.
Option 2 is favored, although your enlarged pupils will have the perhaps unfor-
tunate side effect of making you resemble a Japanese anime character.
Explicitly calculate
∞
x2 μx e−μ
x =
2
x=0
x!
∞ ∞
xμx e−μ
x2 μx e−μ
= = .
x=1
x(x − 1)! x=1 (x − 1)!
and by definition
∞
μz e−μ
μ = 1.
z=0
z!
Thus
x2 = μ2 + μ.
The Sun
7.1. Using data in this chapter, compute the Larmor radius rc for a
typical electron in the K corona.
For the K corona, r ≈ 2.5R and T ≈ 106 K. Using equation (7.2),
1/2 1/2
3kT T
vrms = ≈ 160 km s−1 .
mp 106 K
1/2
The magnetic field of the Sun is very approximately B(r) ≈ B (R /r) ,
with B ≈ 10−3 T. So the magnetic field strength in the K corona is
1/2
R 10−3
B(K corona) = B = ≈ 6.3 × 10−4 T.
2.5R (2.5)1/2
The Larmor radius for an electron in this field (equation 7.13) is
mv (9.1 × 10−31 )(1.6 × 105 )
rc = = = 1.4 × 10−3 m ≈ 1.4 mm.
qB (1.6 × 10−19 )(6.3 × 10−4 )
7.2. The thermal energy of a gas is equal to its number density of
particles times the mean kinetic energy of each particle due to random
motions.
(a) What this the thermal energy density at the base of the Sun’s
photosphere?
From Figure 7.6, T ≈ 6000 K and ρ ≈ 200 × 10−6 kg m−1 . Approximate that
the photosphere is 100% ionized hydrogen, so μ = 0.5. The number density of
particles is n = ρ/μm and the energy density is
ρkT (2 × 10−4 )(1.38 × 10−23 )(6000)
ε= = ≈ 2 × 104 J m−3 .
μm (0.5)(1.67 × 10−27 )
43
7.3. At what rate does the solar wind carry kinetic energy away from
the Sun? Give the result first in watts, then as a fraction of the Sun’s
luminosity in photons, L = 3.8 × 1026 W.
Consider a spherical shell of radius r and thickness Δr through which mass is
flowing. The instantaneous kinetic energy in the shell is given multiplying the
shell’s volume (4πr2 Δr) by the kinetic energy per unit volume,
ρv 2
ΔE = 4πr2 Δr .
2
Dividing through by the time interval Δt gives
ΔE Δr ρv 2
= 4πr2 ,
Δt Δt 2
where we can identify v = Δr/Δt as the rate at which mass flows through
the shell. The rate at which energy flows through the shell is thus ΔE/Δt =
2πr2 ρv 3 . From the text, at r = 1 AU, ρ ≈ 10−21 kg m−3 and v ≈ 400 km s−1 , so
ΔE
Lkinetic = = 2π(1.5 × 1011 )2 (10−21 )(4 × 105 )3 = 9 × 1018 J m−3 .
Δt
In solar units,
Lkinetic 9 × 1018
= = 2.3 × 10−8 .
L 3.8 × 1026
Alternative solution: Use the mass outflow rate from the Sun, Ṁ = 108 kg s−1 ,
and
Ṁ v 2 (108 )(4 × 105 )2
Lkinetic = = ≈ 8 × 1018 J s−1 .
2 2
7.4. How many rotations (and how much time) does it take for the
equatorial regions of the Sun to “lap” the polar regions by one full
rotation?
If the number of rotations is N and the period of the Sun’s rotation is Pequator
and Ppole at the equator and pole, respectively, then we want to solve N ×
Pequator = (N − 1) × Ppole . From section 7.2, we take Ppole ≈ 35 days and
Pequator ≈ 25.4 days. So
Ppole 35
N= = = 3.6.
Ppole − Pequator 35 − 25.4
so −1 −1
1 1 1 1
t= − = − = 92.6 days.
Pequator Ppole 25.4 35
7.5. The normal Zeeman effect splits a spectral line at frequency ν0
into three components: a central line at ν0 and two satellite lines at
ν0 ± eB/(4πme ). By what amount (in angstroms) are the satellite
lines of the hydrogen Balmer α line (λ0 = 6562.81 Å) split from the
central component in a typical sunspot?
First, transform to wavelength units with ν = c/λ, and dν/dλ = −c/λ2 . We
can thus describe a small shift in wavelength as dλ = (λ2 /c) dν. We are given
where we have taken the typical magnetic field strength to be B ≈ 0.1 T. The
displacement of the satellite line is
B2 (0.03)2
Pmagnetic = = ≈ 358 J m−3 .
2μ0 2 × 4π × 10−7
(b) What was the minimum volume V required to supply the mag-
netic energy to fuel the flare?
Energy 2 × 1024 J
Volume = = = 5.6 × 1021 m3 .
energy density 358 J m−3
7.7. If the entire photosphere of the Sun had B = 0.1T, what would
the Alfvén radius of the Sun be? (Hint: assume the properties of the
Δλ v 2 km s−1
= = = 6.7 × 10−6 .
λ c 3 × 105 km s−1
The Doppler shift is larger than the thermal broadening and is therefore easily
measured.
7.9. Imagine a sphere of gas with uniform number density n of gas par-
ticles; each particle has cross-section σ. Consider the optical depth
τ along a path parallel to a line displaced from the center from some
distance z. Compute τ (z) for such path, then compute dτ /dz. Ex-
plain, given this calculation, why as gaseous sphere can appear to
have a very sharp limb.
Refer to Figure 7.1. The optical depth along the line is τ = nσ. From the
geometry, we see that /2 = R cos θ and z/R = sin θ. Therefore, τ = nσ2R cos θ
and with
1/2 z 2 1/2
cos θ = 1 − sin θ
2
= 1− ,
R
we can write 1/2
z2
τ (z) = 2nσR 1 − 2 .
R
Taking the derivative,
−1/2
dτ 1 z2 2z
= −2nσR 1−
dz 2 R2 R2
z z2
−1/2
= −2nσR 1− .
R R2
3 1.35 × 1023
ρ̄ = = 1890 kg m−3 .
4π (2.57 × 106 )3
This low density implies that Titan is an icy body with some rocky/metallic
content.
49
8.4. Pure, solid water ice has an albedo A ≈ 0.35. What is the
minimum distance from the Sun at which a rapidly rotating ice cube
would remain frozen? Between which two planets does this distance
lie?
Using equation (8.10),
r −1/2
Tp = 279 (1 − A)1/4 ,
1 AU
noting that the sublimation temperature of water in a vacuum is ∼ 200 K, and
solving for r,
2
279 1/4
r (AU) = (1 − 0.35) = 1.57 AU.
200
This is just beyond the orbit of Mars.
Thus,
93 −1
μ > 7.1 (14.4) (4) = 0.026.
1000
Retaining hydrogen (μ = 1) is not a problem,
8.6. Because Venus has a very feeble magnetic field, the solar wind
collides with its atmosphere, instead of being deflected by magnetic
forces. Suppose that if a solar wind particle strikes the atmosphere
of Venus, all its kinetic energy will be absorbed.
(a) What is the rate, in watts, at which Venus absorbs energy from
the solar wind? Assume that the energy density of the solar wind is
ρv 2 /2 = 2 × 10−9 J m−3 ,
(b) What is the rate, in watts, at which Venus absorbs energy from
sunlight? Is the solar wind a significant heat source for Venus?
The rate that kinetic energy is transfered to Venus via radiation is
dE L
= πR2 (1 − A)
dt radiation 4πr2
3.8 × 1026 (0.95 × 6.378 × 106 )2 (1 − 0.76)
=
4(0.72 × 1.5 × 1011 )2
= = 7.18 × 1016 J s−1 .
Thus the solar wind is not a significant heat source for Venus.
8.7. Jupiter’s moon Callisto is slowly rotating and has a low albedo
(A ≈ 0.2). What is the temperature of Callisto’s subsolar point?
Would you expect Callisto to retain an atmosphere of N2 ? What
about an atmosphere of He? (Hint: you may assume that the exobase
lies at the surface of Callisto.)
9.2. What is the Larmor radius rc for electrons in the inner van Allen
belt?
The inner van Allen belt is at R < 2R⊕ . Electrons in this belt typically have
energies of ∼ 30 MeV, which is much larger than the electron rest energy of
0.51 MeV, so v ≈ c. The Earth’s magnetic field at the equator is roughly a
dipole (equation 9.20), so
3
R⊕
B(r) = B⊕ ,
r
53
= −3 × 1012 W.
9.4. The continent of Europe (on the Eurasian plate) and the conti-
nent of North America (on the North American plate) are moving
apart from each other at v ∼ 3 cm yr−1 . Estimate how long it has
taken them to attain their current separation of d ∼ 4500 km.
Make the simple assumption that t = d/v, with v = 3 cm yr−1 and d = 4500 km.
This yields
4500 km
5
t= 10 cm km−1 = 1.5 × 108 yr.
3 cm yr−1
It has taken 150 million years for Europe and North America to attain their
current separation distance.
9.5. Show explicitly that the half-life τ0 and the decay constant λ of
a radioactively unstable isotope are related by τ0 =ln 2/λ.
The number of isotopes remaining after time t is N (t) = N0 e−λt , where N0 is
the initial number. At the isotope’s half-life τ0 , N (τ0 ) = N0 /2, so
1
N0 = N0 e−λτ0 .
2
Cancelling common terms and rearranging, eλτ0 = 2, and taking the natural log
of both sides gives λτ0 = ln 2, or τ0 = ln 2/λ.
9.6. At some point along the line between the Earth’s center and the
Moon’s center, the gravitational force exerted by the Earth on a test
mass exactly cancels the gravitational force exerted by the Moon.
How far is this point from the center of the Earth?
Figure 9.1: The centers of the Earth and Moon are separated by a distance r0 .
The center of mass of ths system is between the Earth and Moon, a distance h
from the Earth’s center.
so
2r0 ± 2r0 (MMoon /M⊕ )1/2
h= .
2(1 − (MMoon /M⊕ ))
Cancelling terms and inserting numerical values,
1/2
MMoon MMoon
h = r0 1 ± 1+
M⊕ M⊕
1/2
1 1
= r0 1 ± 1+
81 81
= r0 (1 ± 0.112).
The distance between the test mass and the Moon will be less than the distance
between the test mass and the Earth, since the Earth is more massive. So
h < r0 , and therefore h = r0 (1 − 0.112) = 0.888r0. Since r0 = 3.84 × 105 km,
h = 3.4 × 105 km.
9.7. (a) Show that if a particle is moving upward with a speed v at the
Earth’s exobase, it will reach a maximum height h = v 2 /(2g) above
the exobase, where g = GM⊕ /R2ex is the gravitational acceleration
at the exobase.
The general equation for the height of the particle at time t is h = h0 +vt−gt2 /2,
where h0 is the initial altitude and v is the initial vertical velocity. To find the
maximum height, take the derivative and set it equal to zero,
dh
= v − gt = 0,
dt
from which we conclude that the maximum height is reached after a time t =
v/g. To determine the maximum altitude reached by the particle,
2
v2 1 v v2 v2
hmax = h0 + − g = h0 + −
g 2 g g 2g
so
3kT 3 × 1.38 × 10−23 (103 )
hmax = =
2μmp g 2μ(1.67 × 10−27 )(9.8)
1.26 × 106 m 1.26 × 103
= = km.
μ μ
The typical maximum height for each compound is as follows: for N2 (μ = 28),
hmax = 45 km. For O2 (μ = 32), hmax = 39 km. For H2 (μ = 2), hmax = 632 km.
The ratio of nitrogen to oxygen will increase with height, and the ratio of oxygen
to nitrogen will decrease with height.
8π
Iave = ρave R5 .
15
The core extends to a distance x = Rcore /R⊕ = 3500 km/6400 km = 0.547. The
moment of inertia for the core is thus
8π 5
Icore = ρcore (xR⊕ ) .
15
The moment of inertia for the mantle is
8π
Imantle = 5
ρmantle R⊕ (1 − x5 ).
15
The total moment of inertia is the sum of these, Itot = Icore + Imantle . The mass
of the core is M = 0.31M⊕ = 4πρcore (xR⊕ )3 /3, so the core density is
Imagine the atmosphere as a series of thin shells of radius r and thickness dr.
The mass of a shell is thus dM = 4πr2 ρ⊕ dr and the total mass of the atmosphere
is ∞
M = 4πρ⊕ re−r/H dr.
R⊕
A simpler and perhaps more elegant solution is to note that given that the force
of the entire atmosphere on the Earth’s surface is F = P0 × A = M g, where
A is the surface area of the Earth and g is the gravitational acceleration at the
surface of the Earth. Thus
4πR2 P0 4π(6.4 × 106 )2 (1.01 × 105 )
M= = ≈ 5 × 1018 kg,
g 9.8
in agreement with the other method.
The impactor would have to have a mass of 1023 kg which is roughly twice the
size of the Moon. Note that the speed chosen is the “local speed limit,” i.e., it
assumes a head-on collision between the Earth moving at 30 km s−1 in its orbit
with a body moving at solar escape velocity at 1 AU, vesc = 42 km s−1 .
The Planets
61
10.3. At what frequency νmax would you expect to detect the strongest
cyclotron radiation from the Sun’s K corona?
Equation (10.33) gives the peak frequency for cyclotron radiation, νmax ≈
28.0B GHz. From section 7.1, we know that the K corona extends a distance
r ≈ 2.5 R away from the Sun’s center. Use equation (7.29) for the radial de-
pendence of the Sun’s magnetic field B(r) ≈ B (R /r)2 , where B ≈ 10−3 T.
The magnetic field at the K corona is thus
1/2
R
B(2.5 R ) = B = 6.3 × 10−4 T.
2.5 R
The maximum frequency is thus νmax = 0.0177 GHz = 17.7 MHz.
The differential tidal force on Io due to Jupiter is 440 times larger than the
differential tidal force that the Earth exerts on the Moon.
10.5. How often does an observer at the Sun’s location see the rings
of Saturn exactly edge-on?
An observer at the location of the Sun passes the plane of Saturn’s rings twice
during Saturn’s orbital period. Since Saturn’s orbital period is P = 29.4 years,
Δt = (29.4)/(2) = 14.7 years. The observer will see Saturn’s rings edge-on every
14.7 years.
10.6. Saturn’s moon Titan has a mass M = 1.3 × 1023 kg and a radius
R = 2580 km. The temperature at the surface of Titan is T = 94 K.
(a) What is the gravitational acceleration g at the surface of Titan?
The molecular weight for H2 is μ = 2; this is too light for Titan to retain. The
molecular weight for CO2 is μ = 44, which can be retained by Titan.
(c) If you approximate the atmosphere of Titan as consisting entirely
of molecular nitrogen, what is the scale height of Titan’s atmosphere?
Equation (9.17) gives the scale height as H = kT /(gμmp ). For molecular nitro-
gen (N2 ), μ = 28 so the scale height of Titan’s atmosphere is
10.7. The Earth has an orbit with a⊕ = 1.0AU and e = 0.017. Mars
has an orbit with aMars = 1.524 AU and eMars = 0.093.
(a) If we assume that the orbits of the Earth and Mars are coplanar,
what is the minimum possible distance between the Earth and Mars?
The minimum possible distance between Earth and Mars is when Mars is si-
multaneously at perihelion and opposition as seen from Earth at aphelion. The
perihelion distance of Mars is qMars = aMars (1 − eMars ) = 1.524(1 − 0.093) =
1.382 AU. The aphelion distance of Earth is Q⊕ = a⊕ (1 + e) = 1.017 AU. The
opposition distance of Mars is thus Δ = qM − Q⊕ = 0.365 AU.
(b) The Moon orbits the Earth on an orbit with a = 384, 000 km
and e = 0.055. What is the maximum possible angular separation
between the Earth and Moon as seen from Mars?
The Moon is furthest from the Earth at apogee. The maximum separation
between the Earth and Moon is d = 384, 000(1 + 0.055) km or d = 4.05 × 105 km.
The maximum angular separation seen from Mars is θ(rad) = d/Δ so
The table gives the results for all four Jovian planets.
10.10. The rotation speed of Venus was first measured with ground-
based radar.
(a) A radar signal with initial frequency ν0 is bounced off a target
that is receding at speed v. Show that the returned signal is shifted
to a frequency
2v
ν = ν0 1 −
c
for v c.
An observer on Venus will measure an incident frequency ν where
ν − ν −v
=
ν c
or v
ν = ν 1 − .
c
An observer on Earth will measure the reflected frequency νobs where, similarly,
νobs − ν −v
= ,
ν c
so
v v v
νobs = ν 1 − νobs = ν 1 − 1−
c c c
v 2
= v 1− .
c
Using a Taylor expansion, we have, retaining only the lowest-order term,
2v
νobs ≈ ν 1 − .
c
(b) Suppose that you are in the equatorial plane of Venus and you
bounce a ν0 = 1 GHz radar signal off the entire planet. What is the
spread in frequencies of the returned signal? (Neglect any Doppler
shift due to the motion of the planet as a whole.)
10.11. The orbital planes of Phobos and Deimos are very close to
the equatorial plane of Mars. Thus, when you are standing near the
equator on Mars, you can see Phobos and Deimos pass through the
zenith.
(a) You see Phobos at the zenith. How long will it take Phobos to
reach the horizon? At what point on the horizon will Phobos set?
Table A.4 gives the orbital period of Phobos as PPhobos = 0.3189 days and its
orbital semimajor axis is r = 9378 km. The rotational period of Mars, from
Table A.3, is PMars = 1.026 days, and its radius is R = 3393 km.
Mars
orbit of Phobos
Figure 10.1: Illustrated are the angular rotation rate of Mars (ωMars ), the orbital
angular speed of Phobos (ωPhobos ) and the angular orbital speed of Phobos in
a reference frame that corotates with Mars. Caution: the size of Mars and the
orbit of Phobos are not to scale.
Referring to Figure 10.1, ωPhobos = ωMars + ωsyn where ωPhobos is the orbital
angular velocity of Phobos, ωMars is the angular rotation speed, and ωsyn is the
orbital angular speed of Phobos in a reference frame that co-rotates with Mars.
−1 −1
1 1 1 1
Psyn = − = − = 0.4627 days.
PPhobos PMars 0.3189 1.026
To compute the time from zenith to horizon, refer to Figure 10.2, where we see
that the altitude of the satellite is h = r − R. The segment s is the part of
the satellite’s orbit where it travels from the zenith to the horizon. The angle
θ is defined by θ = cos−1 R/r. Since s = Rθ, the fraction of the synodic orbital
period that the satellite takes to go from the zenith to the horizon is
Δt s Rθ θ
= = = ,
Psyn 2πR 2πR 2π
so
Psyn
Δt = cos−1 (R/r) .
2π
Figure 10.2: Phobos travels a segment s of its orbit traveling from the zenith to
the horizon. Caution: the size of Mars and the orbit of Phobos are not to scale.
As noted above, for Phobos, r = 9378 km and Psyn = 0.4627 days. Therefore
R/r = 3393/9378 = 0.36, so cos−1 R/r = 0.3821π radians and therefore Δt =
0.088 days, or a bit more than 2 hours. Because PPhobos < PMars , Phobos rises
in the west and sets in the east, like low-Earth orbit satellites.
(b) You see Deimos at the zenith. How long will it take Deimos to
reach the horizon? At what point on the horizon will Deimos set?
Table A.4 gives the orbital period PDeimos = 1.026 days: this is a typographical
error in the text, the correct orbital period of Deimos is PDeimos = 1.262 days.
The semimajor axis of its orbit is 23,460 km.
Referring to Figure 10.3, ωDeimos = ωMars − ωsyn , where ωDeimos is the orbital
angular velocity of Deimos and the other quantities are as defined above. Thus
−1 −1
1 1 1 1
Psyn = − = − = 5.49 days.
PMars PDeimos 1.026 1.262
Referring to the result in part (a),
5.49 days 3393 km
Δt = cos−1 = 1.25 days.
2π 23, 460 km
fixed
stars
Figure 10.3: Illustrated are the angular rotation rate of Mars (ωMars ), the orbital
angular speed of Deimos (ωDeimos ) and the apparent angular orbital speed of
Deimos in a reference frame that corotates with Mars. Caution: the size of
Mars and the orbit of Deimos are not to scale.
Because PDeimos > PMars , Phobos rises in the east and sets in the west, like our
own Moon.
11.1. The asteroid Eugenia has a small natural satellite orbiting it.
The orbital period of the satellite is P = 4.76 days. The semimajor
axis of its orbit is a = 1180 km. What is the mass of Eugenia? (Hint:
it is safe to assume that the mass of the satellite is tiny compared to
the mass of Eugenia.)
The mass of Eugenia can be calculated using Kepler’s Third Law,
4π 2 a3 4π 2 (1.18 × 106 )3
M = =
2
GP 2 (6.67 × 10−11 ) 4.76 days × 86, 400 s day−1
= 5.75 × 1018 kg.
69
It will take the bowling ball 105 million years to spiral into the Sun from 1 AU
as a result of the Poynting–Robertson effect.
11.5. In Section 4.3.2, we computed the Hill radius of the Earth, that
is, the maximum stable radius of a satellite around the Earth, given
the differential tidal force provided by the Sun. What is the maximum
stable radius of a comet around the Sun, given the differential tidal
force provided by the Alpha Centauri system, which has M ≈ 2M ?
In view of this calculation, what do you expect the approximate radius
of the Oort cloud to be?
The Hill radius is given by equation (4.45),
1/3 1/3
Mcompanion 1 M
rH = Dperturber = DαCen = 0.63DαCen.
2Mperturber 4 M
q 0.586
a= = = 17.7 AU.
1−e 1 − 0.967
(b) What is its orbital speed at perihelion?
First compute the orbital period, P (years) = a(AU)3/2 = (17.7)3/2 years ≈
75 years. Then use equation (3.68), which gives the orbital speed as a function
of a, P , and r,
1/2
2πa 2a
v(r) = −1 .
P r
At perihelion,
1/2
2π(17.7 AU × 1.49 × 108 km AU−1 ) 2(17.7)
v(q) = −1
75 yrs × (π × 107 s yr−1 ) 0.568
= 54.6 km s−1 .
(b) The satellite and sunshield together have a mass m = 830 kg.
What is their acceleration as a result of the radiation force?
From Newton’s Second Law F = ma, the acceleration is
7.22 × 10−5
a= = 8.7 × 10−8 m s−2 .
830
(c) Estimate the force exerted by the solar wind on the sunshield. Is
this greater than or less than the radiation force?
We take properties of the solar wind from section 7.1, specifically ρ = 10−21 kg
m−3 and v = 400 km s−1 . The force exerted by the solar wind is the rate at
which momentum is transferred to the sunshield.
This is a problem similar to problem 7.3. Consider a spherical shell of radius r
and thickness Δr. The instantanous “momentum density” in the shell is ρv so
the total instantaneous momentum in the shell is the momentum density times
the volume of the shell 4πr2 Δr, so Δp = 4πr2 ρv. Dividing through by the time
Δt that it takes a particle to cross this shell,
Δp Δr
= 4πr2 ρv = 4πr2 ρv 2 ,
Δt Δt
since Δr/Δt = v. This is the momentum in the whole shell, but we need concern
ourselves only with the mass that will hit the sunshield. We therefore substitute
for 4π the solid angle subtended by the sunshield, Ω = A/r2 , where A is the
area of the sunshield as in part (a). Since F = dp/dt, the force exerted by the
solar wind is
dp 2 2 A
Fsw = = Ωr ρv = r2 ρv 2 = Aρv 2 .
dt r2
Inserting numerical values gives
Figure 12.1: The centers of the Earth and Moon are separated by a distance
r0 . The center of mass (CM) of ths system is between the Earth and Moon, a
distance x from the Earth’s center.
Referring to Figure 12.1, the center of mass for the Earth–Moon system is
M⊕ x = m(r0 − x). Solving for r0 , we have
M⊕ + m M⊕
r0 = x=x 1+ .
m m
73
12.2. The star 51 Pegasi has a mass MA = 1.06 M . Its radial velocity
varies sinusoidally with a period P = 4.23 days and an amplitude
vA sin i = 56 m s−1 . What is MB sin i of the exoplanet causing these
velocity variations?
From equation (12.21),
1/3
MA
MB sin i = 11 M⊕ (P [years])1/3 vA sin i
M
1/3
4.23
= 11(1.06)1/3 (56) = 142 M⊕.
365.24
2 2 2
δF πR⊕ R⊕ 6378 km
= 2 = = = 8.4 × 10−5 .
F πR R 6.96 × 105 km
The time it would take for the transit is t = D/vorb , where the orbital velocity
of the Earth is vorb = 30 km s−1 and the diameter of the Sun is D = 2 × 6.96 ×
105 km. Thus t = (2 × 6.96 × 105 )/30 = 4.64 × 104 s = 12.9 hours.
(1 − A)1/4 279(0.49)1/4
TJup ≈ 279 K 1/2
= = 100 K.
r[AU] (5.2)1/2
Consider now the emission from the Sun and Jupiter at λ = 20 μm (2 × 10−5 m).
The energy of a photon at λ = 20 μm is
The ratio of the total orbital angular momentum of the Galilean satellites Ltot
to Jupiter’s rotational angular momentum is
Ltot 4.5 × 1036
= = 6.53 × 10−3 .
Lrot 6.88 × 1038
Jupiter contains most of the angular momentum of the Jupiter system. The
“solar system in miniature” analogy breaks down because the Sun’s rotational
angular momentum is small compared to the orbital angular momentum of the
planets. Whereas the Sun loses its angular momentum to the solar wind, there
is no equivalent process for Jupiter to lose its rotational angular momentum.
we solve for the mass of the planet. Since the system is eclipsing, we can also
assume that sin i ≈ 1, so we have
2/3
M∗ 1/3
Mp = 11 M⊕ (P [yr]) (v∗ )
M
1/3
32
= 11 (1) (65) M⊕
365.24
= 318 M⊕ ≈ 1 MJupiter.
Properties of Stars
13.1. What is the apparent magnitude of the Sun as seen from Mer-
cury at perihelion? What is the apparent magnitude of the Sun as
seen from Eris at aphelion?
Adapt equation (13.25) to calculate apparent magnitude,
where mMerc is the apparent magnitude of the Sun as seen from Mercury, mEarth
is the apparent magnitude of the Sun as seen from Earth (mEarth = −26.75, from
section 13.2), and d is the distance between Mercruy and the Sun at perihelion.
From section 3.1, q = a(1 − e) = (1 − 0.206)0.387 = 0.307 AU. The apparent
magnitude from Mercury at perihelion is thus
which is only four magnitudes brighter than the full Moon as seen from Earth.
79
13.3. What are the angular diameters of the following, as seen from
the Earth?
(a) The Sun, with radius R = 7 × 105 km.
Angular diameters are computed using
D
θ = 206265θ(rad) = 206265 ,
d
where D is the diameter of the object and d is the distance to the object.
o
2 × 7 × 105 km 1
θ = 206265 = 1925 × = 0.53o .
1.5 × 10 km
8 3600
The diameter of Betelgeuse is 2 × 650 R = 1300(6.96 × 105 km) = 9.1 × 108 km.
The angular diameter is
9.1 × 108
θ = 206265 = 0.033.
5.64 × 1015
1o
θ = 1.77 × 104 arcsec × = 4.9o .
3600
4π 2 3
M = a
GP 2
2 3
2π 1 a
=
P G π
2
2π
=
80 yr × (π × 107 ) s yr−1
3
15 AU × 1.5 × 1011 m AU−1
×
6.67 × 10−11
= 1.07 × 10 kg,
30
or M = 0.53M.
Since we are given the absolute bolometric magnitude for Procyon B, we use
equation (13.29) to calculate the luminosity,
13.10. At visible wavelengths, what is the ratio of the flux of the full
Earth as seen from the Moon to the flux of the full Moon as seen
from the Earth? (Hint: the albedos of the Earth and the Moon are
given in Section 8.2.)
Since F ∝ A × R2 where A is the albedo and R is the radius, the ratio of the
fluxes is
2
FEarth AEarth R⊕
= 2
FMoon AMoon RMoon
2
0.4 6378 km
= = (5.71)(13.5) = 77.
0.07 1737 km
Seen from the Moon, the full Earth is 77 times as bright as the full Moon as
seen from the Earth.
If T1 > T2 then the eclipse of star 1 is primary. If T1 < T2 then the eclipse of
star 2 is primary. The hotter star is always the primary eclipse.
(Hint: Use the Wien approximation, and assume λeff ,B = 4450 Å and
Make the assumptions that (a) Sλ (V ) = δ(λ − λeff ) and (b) we can use the
Wien Law, Lλ ∝ exp (−hc/kT ) /λ5 . Using these two approximations we can
write equation (13.84) as
Thus
26, 160
MV = CV + 1.0857 ,
T
where we have collected constant terms into the constant CV . Using the same
approach in the B band for which λeff,B = 4500 Å, we have
32, 700
MB = CB + 1.0875 ,
T
where now
hc
XB (T ) = .
kT λeff,B
The color is thus
1.0857 7100
B − V = CB − CV + [32, 700 − 26, 160] = C + .
T T
By definition, at a temperature T = 10, 000 K, B − V = 0, which requires
C = −0.71, thus yielding
7100
T = .
(B − V ) + 0.71
Stellar Atmospheres
14.1. The star 9 Sagittarii is a main sequence star with spectral type
O5. Its apparent magnitude is mV = 6.0. What is the distance to 9
Sagittarii (ignoring any extinction by dust)?
Solve for the distance using equation (13.22), d = dex [0.2 (m − M + 5)]. Table
A.5 gives MV = −5.7 mag for the absolute magnitude of such a star, so d =
dex [0.2 (6.0 + 5.7 + 5)] = 2190 pc.
14.2. At the center of the Sun, the mass density is ρ = 1.52 × 105 kg
m−3 and the mean opacity is κ = 0.12 m2 kg−1 . What is the mean
free path for a photon at the Sun’s center?
Using equation (15.23),
1 1
= = m = 5.6 × 10−5 m = 56 μm.
κρ (0.12)(1.5 × 105 )
87
14.4. Show explicitly that if the Sun’s photosphere were not ionized,
its mean molecular mass would be μ ≈ 1.25.
In section 14.1, we calculated the number density of hydrogen, helium, and
metals in their fully ionized state within the Sun’s photosphere, Employing the
same logic here and assuming that they are all neutral, we have:
For hydrogen, n = ρ/mp . For helium, n = ρ/4mp . For metals, n = ρ/Amp . The
molecular weight for neutral particles is thus
−1 −1
ρ nmp Y Z
μneutral = = = X+ +
nmp ρ 4 A
The value for A (A > 4) is large compared to the value for Z (0.016) so we can
simplify this equation to
−1
Y
μneutral ≈ X + .
4
From section 14.1, X ≈ 0.734, and Y ≈ 0.25, so the mean molecular weight of
the Sun’s photosphere if it weren’t ionized would be
−1
0.25
μneutral ≈ 0.734 + = (0.796)−1 ≈ 1.25.
4
14.5. When a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram is constructed from ob-
served data (as in Figure 14.2b), part of the width of the main se-
quence is due to errors in distance measurements. If a typical un-
certainty in parallax is 10%, in which direction and by how much (in
magnitudes) will stars typically be displaced from their true positions
on the H–R diagram?
Starting with L = 4πF r2 , we can write dL = 8πrF dr. Given that the typical
uncertainty in distance is 10%, the fractional error in distance is dr/r = 0.1,
and this translates to a fractional uncertainty in luminosity
dL 8πrF dr 2dr
= = = 2(0.1) = 0.20.
L 4πr2 F r
Stellar Interiors
15.1. What is the rate (in kilograms per second) at which the Sun is
currently converting hydrogen into helium?
The luminosity is the rate at which energy is produced, L = ηc2 (dm/dt), where
η = 0.007 is the efficiency. Thus
dm L 3.9 × 1026 W
= 2 = = 6 × 1011 kg s−1 .
dt ηc 0.007(3 × 108 )2
4p →4 He + 2e+ + 2νe + 2γ
15.3. Approximately half the original hydrogen in the Sun’s core has
now been converted to helium. Compute the mean molecular mass
μ (a) at the surface of the Sun, given standard abundances (X =
0.734, Y = 0.250, Z = 0.016), and (b) at the center of the Sun.
Equation (14.9) gives the mean molecular weight μ for a completely ionized gas,
−1
3 1
μ(ionized) = 2X + Y + Z .
4 2
91
For the second star, this calculation gives E = 0.007 × 0.5 × 1.99 × 1030 × (3 ×
108 )2 = 6.27 × 1044 J, and L = 0.1 × 3.84 × 1026 = 3.84 × 1025 W. Therefore
GM2
q(6.67 × 10−11 )(1.99 × 1030 )2
U = −q = = q(3.80 × 1041 ) J.
R 6.96 × 108
For a sphere of uniform density q = 3/5, though for the actual Sun q ≈ 1.5.
The change in gravitational potential energy per unit time is thus
dU 1 dR −U dR
= qGM 2 = .
dt R dt R dt
Assuming the energy is converted to radiation,
−1 dU U dR
L= = ,
2 dt 2R dt
dR 2L 2(3.84 × 1026 )
= dt = dt.
R U q 3.80 × 1041
dR
= 6.3 × 10−4 ,
R
corrresponding to a decrease in the Sun’s radius dR = 6.3×10−4 R ≈ 440 km.
15.6. Suppose that the Sun is 100% carbon (coal, for instance) and
that burning this can extract 3 eV per carbon nucleus. How long, as-
suming an inexhaustible supply of oxygen from outside, could burning
carbon maintain the Sun’s current luminosity?
The mass of a carbon atom is mC = 12 × (1.67 × 10−27 ) = 2.0 × 10−26 kg. The
number of carbon atoms it would take to make one solar mass is
2 × 1030 kg
Nc = = 1056 nuclei.
2 × 10−26 kg/nucleus
Now if 3 eV is extracted from each nucleus, the total amount of available energy
is
The length of time the Sun could maintain its current luminosity by burning
carbon would be
E 4.8 × 1036 J 1.25 × 1011 s
t= = −1 = = 3980 yr.
L 3.84 × 10 J s
26 π × 107 s yr−1
15.7. On a clear day, Mount Fuji can be seen from central Tokyo,
100 km away. Under these conditions, what is the maximum possible
opacity κ of that atmosphere, in m2 kg−1 ? (Assume that the density
of air along the line of sight is ρ ≈ 1 kg m−3 .)
Use equation (15.23),
= 1/κρ, where the mass density of air is ρ = 1 kg m−3
and the distance is = 100 km or 105 m. If we can see at least 100 km, then
κ < 1/(
ρ) = 1/105 = 10−5 m2 kg−1 .
15.8. Under ideal conditions, scuba divers in clear tropical waters can
see objects as far as 50 m away. What is the opacity of the water?
This is nearly identical to the previous problem, though in this case we have
≈ 50 m, so κ = 1/(
ρ) = 1/(50 × 1000) = 2 × 10−5 m2 kg−1 .
By comparing this result with that of problem 15.7, it is seen that, per unit
mass, clear water is around twice as opaque as clear air.
κ ∝ ρT −3.5.
L ∝ M 5.5 R−0.5 .
T 4R T 4R T 15/2 R
L∝ ∝ −7/2
= .
κρ ρ (T ) ρ ρ2
15 GM 2
Pc = .
16π R4
−GM (r)ρ(r)
dP = dr,
r2
and integrate over the star. Thus,
0 R 3
r r5 r2 dr
dP = −Pc = −G 4πρ0 − ρ 0 1 −
Pc 0 3 5R2 R2 r 2
R
r R3 r2
= −4πGρ0 2
− 1 − 2 dr
0 3 5R2 R
1 R 1 R
= −4πGρ20 rdr − 2
r3 dr
3 0 5R 0
R R
1 1
− 2 3
r dr + 5
r dr
3R 0 5R4 0
2 4
2 1 R 1 R
= −4πGρ0 −
3 2 5R2 4
4 6
1 R 1 R
− 2 + 4
3R 4 5R 6
1 1 1 1
= −4πGρ0 R
2 2
− − +
6 20 12 30
1
= −4πGρ20 R2 .
15
So the central pressure is
2
4π 2 2 4π 15 M 15 GM 2
Pc = Gρ0 R = GR2 = .
15 15 8π R3 16π R4
16.2. The Sun emits 5 × 1023 photons per second with hν > 13.6 eV.
If the density of hydrogen atoms in interplanetary space is n = 109
m−3 , what is the size of the Sun’s Strömgren sphere? Assume a
recombination coefficient α = 2.6 × 10−19 m3 s−1 .
We can use equation (16.19) to calculate the Sun’s Strömgren radius,
1/3 1/3
3 Q∗ 3 5 × 1023
RS = = = 7.7 × 107 m.
4π α(Te ) n2e 4π 2.6 × 10−19 (109 )2
97
This is less than the radius of the Sun; the student should recognize this and
realize that the point-source approximation for the Sun is incorrect.
16.4. Dust grains made of graphite will sublime (that is, turn from
solid to gas) at a temperature T ≈ 1500 K. The albedo of graphite is
A ≈ 0.04.
(a) How close to an O5 V star (Teff = 42, 000 K, R = 12 R ) can
graphite grains survive?
We can apply equation (8.13) for the subsolar temperature to this problem,
1/2
R∗
Tg = (1 − A)1/4 T∗ .
r
and
r = 12R × 768 = 9216 R.
The integral in the numerator equals exp(−x0 ). The integral in the denominator
is the first exponential integral (equation 16.27) and for x0
1, we can expand
and keep the first two terms only so
∞ −x
e e−x0 1
E1 (x0 ) = dx ≈ 1− .
x0 x x0 x0
kT∗ e−x0 x0
hν ≈
e−x0(1 − (1/x0 ))
≈ kT∗ x0 [1 + (1/x0 )]
= kT∗ [x0 + 1]
hν0
= kT∗ +1
kT∗
= hν0 + kT∗ ,
1 1
K = (Mtotal ) v 2 = (2M )(5km s−1 )
2 2
1
2
= 2 × 1.99 × 1030 5 × 103
2
= 4.98 × 1037 J.
2 M 2 × 1.99 × 1030 kg
= = 2.38 × 1057 .
mp 1.67 × 10−27 kg/atom
4.98 × 1037
= = 2.09 × 10−20 J.
2.38 × 1057
The thermal energy per particle before the collision is 3kTbefore/2 ≈ 1.5 × 1.38 ×
10−23 (100) = 2.07 × 10−21 J. The thermal energy per particle after the collision
is the sum of the last two quantities,
3 3
kTafter = kTbefore + = (2.07 × 10−21 ) + (2.09 × 10−20 ) = 2.3 × 10−20 J.
2 2
The final temperature of the 2 M hydrogen cloud is
2 × 2.3 × 10−20
Tafter = ≈ 1100 K.
3 × 1.38 × 10−23
16.6. In general, an F0 main sequence star has absolute magnitude
Mv = 2.7 and intrinsic color (B − V )0 = 0.30. A specific F0 main
sequence star is observed to have mV = 12.00 and mB = 12.56.
(a) What is the color excess E(B − V ) for this star?
We can find the color excess from equation (16.6),
E(B − V ) = (B − V ) − (B − V )0
= (12.56 − 12.00) − 0.30 = 0.26
(d) What distance would you have computed if you had ignored ex-
tinction?
If we had ignored extinction, then our distance equation would have been
1 5 × 1011 s
τrec = = = 1.6 × 104 yrs.
2× 10−19 × 107 π × 107 s yr−1
N 1.5 × 1024
d= = = 1.5 × 1016 m = 0.48 pc.
n 108
M = 1.8 × 1056 atoms × 1.67 × 10−27 kg/atom = 2.9 × 1029 kg = 0.15 M.
(d) If 75% of the atoms are in the higher-energy parallel state, how
many 21 cm photons are emitted per second by the cloud?
The number of photons emitted per second is Nγ = Natoms × g2 A21 , where
g2 = 3 (since we are given that 75% are in the upper state and the remaining
25% must be in the lower state so that g1 = 1) and A21 = 2.87 × 10−15 s−1 .
Thus,
L 1.47 × 1018
F = = = 1.2 × 10−20 W m−2 .
4πr 2 4π(3.1 × 1018 )2
So for λ = 5890 Å, Δλ = 3.3 × 10−3 Å. In the Sun, T = 5800 K, so Δλ/λ =
4.7 × 10−6 , and Δλ = 0.028 Å.
103
ρ0 = μmp n
= 2 × 1.67 × 10−27 × 1012
= 3.3 × 10−15 kg m−3 .
The Jeans length, Jeans mass, and freefall time are, respectively,
For the atomic hydrogen cloud, γ = 5/3, μ = 1, and T = 120 K, so the mass
density is ρ0 = μmp n = 1.67 × 10−20 kg m−3 . The Jeans length, Jeans mass,
and freefall time are, respectively,
MJ = 2 × 1034 kg ≈ 104 M .
teff = 5.1 × 1014 s ≈ 1.6 × 107 yr.
17.4. In this problem, you will estimate the duration of the horizontal
branch phase in a 1 M star.
(a) Compute the energy released in the net triple alpha reaction 34 He
→12 C. The masses of 4 He and 12 C are 4.0026 amu and 12.0000 amu,
respectively, where 1 amu (atomic mass unit) = 1.6606 × 10−27 kg.
The energy per reaction is
(b) Assume that at the beginning of the horizontal branch phase, 10%
of the original mass of the star is in the form of 4 He in the stellar
core. Estimate the total energy released by fusing this amount of
helium into carbon via the triple alpha process.
If 10% of mass available as He, M = 0.1 M . The number of He nuclei is thus
The number of reactions is the number of nuclei divided by three nuclei per
triple-alpha reaction, i.e., 1055 . At 7.3 MeV per reaction, the total energy
available is
106 eV
E = 7.3 MeV × 1055 × 1.6 × 10−19 J eV−1 = 1.2 × 1043 J.
MeV
E 1.2 × 1043 J 1
Δt = = −1 × = 9.7 × 106 yrs.
L 100 × 3.84 × 10 J s
26 π × 107 s yr−1
17.5. Make an order-of-magnitude estimate of the length of the
protostar phase for the Sun.
U GM 2
t ∼ ∼
L RL
6.67 × 10−11 (2 × 1030 )2
∼
(7 × 108 )(4 × 1026 )
9.5 × 1014 s
∼
π × 107 s yr−1
∼ 3 × 107 yr ∼ 30 Myr.
17.6. What is the thermal energy density, in joules per cubic me-
ter, of a typical giant molecular cloud? What is the thermal energy
density of the Earth’s atmosphere at sea level?
The kinetic energy per particle is K = 3kT /2. From the text, typical properties
of giant molecular clouds are T ∼ 10 K and n ∼ 109 m−3 . The thermal energy
density of the cloud is thus
particles 3 J
ε = n × kT
m3 2 particle
= 109 × (1.5) × 1.38 × 1023 (10)
= 2 × 10−13 J m−3
For comparison, Earth’s atmosphere at sea level (using parameters from section
17.1) has n ∼ 1025 particles m−3 and T ≈ 290 K so the thermal energy density
is ε = 1025 × (1.5)1.38 × 1023 (290) ∼ 6 × 104 J m−3 . You should compare this
to the result problem 7.2, in which the energy density at the base of the Sun’s
photosphere is calculated.
Stellar Remnants
107
4π 2 R2 GM
v2 = < .
P2 R
Rearranging to put a limit on the rotational period and writing the mass in
terms of the density M = 4πρR3 /3,
4π 2 R3
P2 >
GM
4π 2 3 R3 3π
= = .
G 4π ρR3 Gρ
Thus the stability condition is
1/2
3π
P >
Gρ
1/2
3π
=
6.67 × 10−11 × 2 × 109
= 8.4 s,
where we have used the density from equation (18.1), ρ = 2 × 109 kg m−3 .
3 × 2 × 10−26
ρC = = 1.18 × 1017 kg m−3 ,
4π(3 × 10−15 )3
1
K = M v2
2
1
m 2
= × 4 × 1.99 × 1030 kg 5 × 106
2 s
= 1044 J.
(b) The ejecta are slowed by sweeping up the local interstellar gas.
Assuming the density of the interstellar gas is ρ = 2 × 10−19 kg m−3 ,
how large a volume will be swept up by the time the outflow velocity
has decreased to 10 km s−1 ? (Hint: you may assume that the kinetic
energy of expansion is conserved.)
If we assume that all of this kinetic energy is transferred to the surrounding gas,
then
1 2
ρv × V = K,
2
where V is the volume. If we assume that the volume is spherical (V = 4πR3 /3),
then the radius of the volume is
1/3 1/3
3 2K 3 2 × 1044 J 1.3 × 1018 m
R= = = = 43 pc.
4π ρv 2 4π 2 × 10−19 (104 )2 3.1 × 1016 m pc−1
Δν rSch
≈− ,
ν0 2r
non−degenerate
10
log T
degenerate
5
Jupiter
5 10 15
log ρ
Figure 18.1: The line shows where the equation of state for an ideal gas equals
that of a degenerate gas. The position of Jupiter’s core is also shown.
What is the shortest possible sound crossing time for a white dwarf ?
How does this timescale compare to the shortest known pulsar peri-
ods?
1/2
Since γ ≈ 1, the speed of sound is cs ∼ (P/ρ) . Using equation (18.35),
2 5/3
h̄ ρ
P ∼ ,
me m5/3
p
Numerically, this is
3
1.05 × 10−34
t = 2
[(6.67 × 10−31 ) (9.1 × 10−31 ) (1.67 × 10−27 )]
1/2 −1
9.1 × 10−31 1 M
×
1.67 × 10−27 1.99 × 1030 M
−1
M
= 1.33 s.
M
This is still larger than the rotational period of any known pulsar.
Our Galaxy
19.1 A star at rest with respect to the LSR is 60o away from the solar
apex. The star’s parallax is π = 15 milliarcseconds (mas). What are
its radial velocity and proper motion? In what direction is the proper
motion, relative to the solar apex?
Figure 19.1: If a star is stationary relative to the LSR, then its space velocity is
the opposite of the Sun’s peculiar velocity relative to the LSR. In the diagram,
−V is the space velocity of the star, vr is its radial velocity, and vt is its
tangential velocity. The star is located at an angle λ from the solar apex.
Since the star is at rest with respect to the LSR, its motion is just the reverse
of the Sun’s motion, i.e., its space velocity is the opposite of the Sun’s peculiar
velocity, V = −V and |V | = 19.5 km s−1 . From Figure 19.1, the tangential
velocity is vt = V sin λ = 16.9 km s−1 and the radial velocity is vr = V cos λ =
115
19.2 Suppose the Milky Way consisted of 2.7 × 1011 stars, each of
solar luminosity, MB = 4.7. What would be the absolute magnitude
of the whole Galaxy?
We can use equation (13.16) and ignore the zero-point since we’ll convert back
to magnitudes immediately. Thus LB = 2.7 × 1011 × dex[−0.4(4.7)] and Mtot =
−2.5 log LB = −23.9 mag.
We note that actually MB = 5.47 mag for the Sun. The value given in the
question is closer to the bolometric magnitude Mbol, = 4.74 mag. Using the
correct value MB = 5.47 mag, we find LB = 2.7 × 1011 × dex[−0.4(5.47)] and
Mtot = −2.5 log LB = −22.8 mag.
19.3. Show that in the case of Keplerian orbits with a centrally con-
centrated mass (that is, M (r) = constant),
A−B
=2.
A+B
Does this agree with the observationally determined values of A and
B for the Galaxy?
We start with the definitions of the Oort constants,
−R0 dω
A=
2 dR R=R0
and
B = A − ω0 .
For Keplerian rotation, the orbital speed is
1/2
GM
Θ= ,
R
so the angular speed is
1/2
Θ (GM )
ω= = .
R R3/2
Differentiating this with respect to R gives
dω 3 −5/2
= (GM ) 1/2
− R
dR 2
3 (GM )1/2 3ω0
= − 3/2
=− .
2R R 2R0
A+B A + (A − ω0 )
=
A−B A − A + ω0
2A − ω0 2A
= = − 1,
ω0 ω0
and
−R0 3 ω0 3
A= − = ω0 ,
2 2 R0 4
so
2A 2 3 3
= ω0 = .
ω0 ω0 4 2
Therefore
A+B 3 1
= −1= ,
A−B 2 2
or
A−B
= 2.
A+B
The observed values A = 14.8 km s−1 kpc−1 and B = −12.4 km s−1 kpc−1 give
A−B 14.8 + 12.4
= ≈ 11,
A+B 14.8 − 12.4
in substantial disagreement with the prediction. We conclude that Keplerian
approximation is poor at the location of the Sun in the Galaxy.
19.5. Determine the proper motion relative to the LSR for a star in
a circular orbit about the Galactic center, at a distance d = 5 kpc
from the Sun and at galactic longitude = 45o . [Hint: the Galaxy’s
rotation curve is given in Figure 19.19.]
Referring to Figure 19.15 in the text, the law of cosines gives us R2 = R02 + d2 −
2R0 d cos , where R0 = 8.5 kpc, d = 5 kpc, and = 45o . Therefore
1/2
R = (8.5)2 + (5)2 − 2(8.5)(5) cos 45o kpc = 6.1 kpc.
From Figure 19.19, we see that Θ = 225 km s−1 at R ≈ 6 kpc. Again using the
law of cosines and Figure 19.15,
Therefore,
R02 − R2 − d2 (8.5)2 − (6.1)2 − (5)2
sin α = = = 0.17,
2Rd 2(6.1)(5)
or α = 9o.6. Now using equation (19.38),
19.6. The star Rigel has a radial velocity vr = 20.7 km s−1 , parallax
π = 4.22 mas, and proper motion components μα = 1.67 mas yr−1
in right ascension and μδ = 0.56 mas yr−1 in declination. What are
its total proper motion, tangential velocity, and space motion?
The magnitude of the proper motion of Rigel is μ = (μ2α + μ2δ )1/2 = (1.672 +
0.562 )1/2 = 1.76 mas yr−1 . Its tangential velocity is
μ 4.74(1.76 × 10−3 )
−1
vt = 4.74 km s = = 2.0 km s−1 .
π 4.22 × 10−3
The space velocity of Rigel is
1/2
1/2
V = vr2 + vt2 = (20.7)2 + (2.0)2 km s−1 = 20.8 km s−1 .
Assume that the density function is a power law of the form ρ = Cr−α . Then
R
4πC 3−α
M (R) = 4πC r2−α dr = R ,
0 3−α
19.9. The Perseus spiral arm of the Galaxy can be traced from R =
4 kpc from the Galactic center to R = 12 kpc. Using the rotation
curve in Figure 19.19 determine how long it takes for the stars at the
inner end of the Perseus arm to gain one full orbit on stars at the
outer end.
This is analgous to computing a synodic period,
−1
1 1
S= − ,
P4 kpc P12 kpc
Similarly,
The time it takes the inner arm to gain one full rotation on the outer arm is
thus −1
1 1
S= − Myr = 183 Myr.
118 331
19.10. The star S0-2, of spectral class B1 V, orbits the central black
hole at the Galactic center on an orbit with semimajor axis a =
920 AU and eccentricity e = 0.867.
(a) What is the star’s distance from the black hole at pericenter?
The closest approach to to the black hole is q = a(1 − e) = 920(1 − 0.867) AU =
122 AU.
(b) How close does the star get to the Roche limit?
Use equation (4.32),
1/3
2M
rR ∼ Δr,
M
where in this context M is the black hole mass, m is the mass of the star S0-
2, and Δr is the radius of S0-2. From Table A.5, we roughly estimate that
M ≈ 15M and R ≈ 7R for a B1 main sequence star, so that
1/3
2 × 3.7 × 106 M
rR = 7 × 6.96 × 105 km
15M
= (79) 4.87 × 106 km
3.85 × 108 km
= = 2.6 AU.
1.5 × 108 km AU−1
This is comfortably away far from the black hole, since
q 122 AU
= ≈ 48.
rR 2.6 AU
Galaxies
123
m−M = 5 log d − 5
= 5 log 3.09 × 108 − 5
= 37.45
20.3. Rewrite the relation for the distance modulus (equation 13.25)
in terms of the redshift z rather than the distance d.
Starting with the equation (13.25), m − M = 5 log(d/10pc), we use the Hubble
law to find the distance
cz
d =
H
3 × 105 z 106 pc
= Mpc ×
70 Mpc
= 4.29 × 10 z pc.
9
20.4. A spiral galaxy, when seen face-on, appears circular; the flux you
observe per square arcsecond of the galaxy is given by the relation
Σ(r) = Σ0 e−r/r0 ,
20.5. You observe an E0 elliptical galaxy; the flux you observe per
square arcsecond of the galaxy is given by the relation
Σ(r) = Σ0 exp −(r/r0 )1/4 ,
where in the last step we have made use of the fact that
∞
x7 e−x dx = 7!.
0
From Figure 20.10, for MBH = 108 M , log σ ≈ 2.2, or σ ≈ 160 km s−1 . There-
fore
8 −2
10 M 160 km s−1
rBH = 11 pc = 17.2 pc.
108 M 200 km s−1
Hubble Space Telescope is diffraction limited at λ = 1μm = 10−6 m, so the
smallest resolvable angle is given by the Rayleigh criterion (equation 6.7), θ =
1.2(λ/D), where the diameter of the Hubble Space Telescope primary mirror is
D = 2.4 m. Thus,
10−6 m
θ(rad) = 1.2 × = 5 × 10−7 rad.
2.4 m
cz 3 × 104 km s−1
d= > = 430 Mpc.
H 70 km s−1 Mpc−1
Active Galaxies
21.1. The quasar PDS 456 has a redshift z = 0.184 and an apparent
magnitude mV = 14.0.
(a) What is the distance to this quasar?
The distance can be computed from the Hubble law,
cz 3 × 105
d= = (0.184) Mpc = 789 Mpc.
H 70
M = m + 5 − 5 log d (pc)
= 14.0 + 5 − 5 log(7.89 × 108 ) (pc)
= −25.5 mag.
21.2. At what redshift will the Lyα line (λ0 = 1215 Å) be centered
in the Johnson–Cousins U band? (Quasars will be particularly easy
to discover at this redshift.)
From Figure 13.2, the center of the U band is ∼ 3600 Å, so 1215(1 + z) = 3600
and z = (3600/1215) − 1 = 1.96.
129
21.4. Stellar-mass black holes in close binary systems can have hot
accretion disks. These systems, sometimes called “microquasars”, are
bright X-ray sources. Explain quantitatively why microquasars are
so luminous in X-rays. [Hint: equation (21.25) gives the temperature
of an accretion disk.]
For a stellar-mass black hole, take M ≈ 10M and equation (21.25) becomes
−1/4 −3/4
10 r
T ≈ 3.5 × 105 ṁ1/4 K
108 rSch
−3/4
r
≈ 2 × 10 ṁ
7
K.
rSch
Assuming ṁ ≈ 1 and r ≈ rSch , we can use Wien’s Law to see where this
spectrum peaks,
2900 μm K
λmax = = 1.5 × 10−4 μm × 104 Å μm−1 ≈ 1.5 Å.
2 × 107 K
This wavelength corresponds to a photon energy
hc 1.24 × 104 eV Å
E = =
λ 1.5 Å
= 8.2 × 103 eV = 8.3 keV,
redshift z = 0.00332; what is the angular size of the broad line region
of NGC 4151, measured in arcseconds?
Equation (21.27) gives
1/2
RBLR Lbol
≈ 0.26 .
1015 m 1037 W
The angular size of the BLR at a distance d is
1/2 1/2
RBLR L Lbol 1/2
θBLR (rad) ∼ ∝ bol ∝ ∝ Fbol ,
d d d2
where Fbol is the bolometric continuum flux from the AGN.
In the case of NGC 4151 where z = 0.00332 and d = (cz/H) = 14.2 Mpc,
21.6. If the widths of the broad emission lines in AGN spectra were
due to thermal broadening, how hot would the gas have to be? On
what grounds can we exclude the possibility of pure thermal broad-
ening?
Doppler broadening by thermal motions is given by equation (5.51),
1/2
Δλ T Δv
∼ 3 × 10−7 ∼ .
λ μ c
A line width of Δv = 5000 km s−1 corresponds to a temperature
2
Δv/c
T ≈ μ K
3 × 10−7
2
5000/(3 × 105 )
≈
3 × 10−7
≈ 3 × 109 K.
The mass of the central source, where Δv is the Doppler line width and R is
the size of the broad-line region, is
Δv 2 R (3.5 × 106 m sec−1 )2 (5.8 × 1015 )
M∼ = −1
G 6.67 × 10−11 × 1.99 × 1030 kg M
= 5.4 × 108 M .
Ṁ L 5.0 × 1039
ṁ = = = ≈ 0.72.
ṀE LE 6.96 × 1039
21.8. For a quasar jet, show that the maximum value of βT (θ) occurs
when the radio source in the jet is moving at an angle θ max = cos−1 β
relative to the line of sight; then prove that equation (21.35) is correct.
we obtain
β sin θmax
βT (max) =
1 − β cos θmax
β(1 − β 2 )1−2
=
1 − β2
β
= = βγ.
(1 − β 2 )1/2
21.9. Most quasars do not show damped Lyman alpha lines in their
“Lyman alpha forest”. However, by observing many quasars, we can
estimate that the mean free path λ between damped Lyman alpha ab-
sorbers is ∼ 70,000 Mpc. Assuming that these systems are associated
with luminous galaxies, which have a space density n ≈ 0.01 Mpc−3 ,
what does this say about the size of the atomic hydrogen disks of
typical luminous galaxies?
The mean free path λ is related to the number density n and cross section of
the absorbers σ by λ = 1/(nσ), which implies σ = (nλ)−1 , where we are given
n = 0.01 Mpc−3 and λ = 7 × 104 Mpc. Thus,
1
σ = Mpc2
10−2 × 7 × 104
2
kpc
= 1.4 × 10−3 Mpc3 103
Mpc
= 1.4 × 103 kpc2 .
From Figure 22.2, the distance to the Virgo cluster is d = 16 Mpc, and the
diameter of the Local Group is D ∼ 2 Mpc. The angular size of the Local
Group as seen from the Virgo cluster is therefore
2 Mpc 180o
θ≈ ≈ 0.13 rad × ≈ 7o .
16 Mpc π
(b) What would be the angular size of the Milky Way Galaxy?
135
m = M + 5 log d − 5
= −6.92 + 5 log(108 ) − 5
= 28.08 mag.
22.3. How would the “finger of God” effect change if the dominant
motion of clusters was rotation?
“Fingers” would not point at the observer, but would be tilted, with the ap-
proaching (blueshifted) side of the cluster appearing to be closer.
22.4. Using data from this chapter, estimate the time it takes a
galaxy in the Coma Cluster to cross from one side of the cluster to
the other. Does this result tell you anything about whether or not
the cluster is gravitationally bound?
Typical speed of galaxies in Coma is ∼ 1500 km s−1 (equation 22.20). The half-
light radius of the Coma cluster is ∼ 1.5 Mpc ∼ 4.6 × 1022 m (equation 22.7).
The cluster crossing time is
2R 2 × 4.6 × 1022 m 1
t = =
v 1.5 × 106 m s−1 π × 10 sec yr−1
7
This is much less than the age of the universe (13 Gyr), so the cluster must be
gravitationally bound.
22.5. In a few billion years, as we note in this chapter, our galaxy and
the Andromeda Galaxy will merge. Compute the expected number
of collisions between stars when this occurs. [Assume that the typical
star in each galaxy is an M dwarf, and that their average space density
is equal to that of the solar neighborhood.]
In the solar neighborhood, the typical distance between stars is n ∼ 1 pc−3 .
The size of a typical M dwarf is R ∼ 0.5R , so the collisional cross section for
a star is
σ = πR2
2
π (0.5)(6.96 × 108 m)
=
(3.1 × 1016 m/pc)2
= 4 × 10−16 pc2 .
To determine the effective path through our galaxy, assume that there are 2 ×
1011 stars so the volume this represents is V = N/n ∼ 2 × 1011 pc3 . A one-
dimensional path length through it is thus ∼ V 1/3 ∼ 6 kpc. The probability
of a collision of any particular star would be
log N = 0.6m + C,
so one-quarter of the sky is 10, 313 sq deg. Thus the total number of galaxies in
the sample area and to the sample limiting magnitude is
Cosmology
23.1. Suppose that we smooth the Earth so that it’s a perfect sphere of
radius R⊕ = 6371 km. If we then draw on its surface an equilateral
triangle with sides of length L = 1 km, what will the sum of the
interior angles be?
Figure 23.1: An √
√ equilateral triangle with sides of length L has a height h =
3L/2 and area 3L2 /4.
139
and therefore
√ 2
A 3 (1 km)
=
rc2 4(6378 km)2
= 1.06 × 10−8 rad
= 2.2 × 10−3 arcsec = 2.2 mas.
The critical density is given by equation (23.34), ρc = 9.2 × 10−27 kg m−3 . For
objects of mass m and number density n, the critical number density is
ρ 9.2 × 10−27
n(m−3 ) = =
m 0.62
= 1.5 × 10−26 m−3 .
(b) Given this density of basketballs, how far, on average, would you
be able to see in any direction before your line of sight intersected a
basketball?
The mean free path for sight lines that terminate on basketballs is = (nσ)−1 .
2
The cross-section per basketball is σ = πR2 = π (0.12 m) = 0.045 m2. Thus
1 1
= =
nσ 0.045 m × 1.5 × 10−26 m−3
2
1.5 × 1027 m
= = 4.8 × 1010 pc
3.1 × 1016 m pc−1
= 48 Gpc.
body is
70 kg
V ≈ = 0.070 m3.
1000 kg m−3
The number density of neutrinos is nν = 3.36 × 108 m−3 , so the number in a
human body is
Nν = nν V = 3.36 × 108 × 0.070 = 2.35 × 107 ,
or about 23 million.
(b) What average neutrino mass, mν , would be required to make the
mass density of cosmic neutrinos equal to the critical density ρc,0 ?
The critical density is given by equation (23.34), ρc = 9.2 × 10−27 kg m−3 , so
the neutrino mass required to close the universe is
9.2 × 10−27 kg m−3
mν =
3.36 × 108 m−3
0.511 MeV
= 2.71 × 10−35 kg ×
9.1 × 10−31 kg
= 1.52 × 10−5 MeV
= 15 eV,
where in the second step we used the electron rest energy to convert from kilo-
grams to MeV.
23.4. Suppose you are in a Newtonian universe whose density is
equal to the critical density ρc,0 . The scale factor a(t) is implicitly
given by the relation
ȧ2 8πGρ0 1
2
= .
a 3 a3
(a) What is the functional form of a(t), given the boundary condition
a = 1 at t = t0 ?
Since H0 = 8πGρ0 /3, we can write
ȧ −H0
=
a a3/2
1/2
a ȧ = H0
1/2 da
a = H0
dt
1/2
a da = H0 dt
2 3/2
a = H0 t
3
3
a3/2 = H0 t
2
2/3
3
a(t) = H0 t .
2
2hν03 1
Iν = .
c2 e(hν0 /kT0 ) − 1
If the blackbody is redshifted, each frequency is lowered to
ν0
ν1 = ,
1+z
so we have
2hν03 1
Iν = −1
c2 (1+ z)3 e(hν0 /kT0 (1+z))
which is still a blackbody, but at temperature T1 = T0 /(1 + z).
24.1. (a) Given that the current scale factor is a(t0 ) = 1, at what
scale factor did the temperature of the cosmic background radiation
equal the temperature of the Sun’s photosphere?
Since T ∼ 1/a, and T0 = 2.7 K, and T = 5800 K.
2.7
a= = 4.66 × 10−4 .
5800
(b) At what scale factor did it equal the temperature of the Sun’s
center?
Using equation (15.10), Tcent = 1.47 × 107 K, so
2.7
a= = 1.84 × 10−7 .
1.47 × 107
(c) If the current mass density of the universe is equal to 0.3ρc,0,
what was the mass density of the universe when the temperature was
equal to that of the Sun’s center? Compare this mass density to the
average density of the Sun.
At the current epoch ρ0 = 0.3ρcrit , where ρcrit = 9.2 × 10−27 kg m−3 (equation
23.34).
ρ0 0.3(9.2 × 10−27 )
ρpast = =
a3 (1.84 × 10−7 )3
= 4.5 × 10−7 kg m−3 .
This is much smaller than average density of the Sun, ρ ≈ 1400 kg m−3 .
143
24.3. At the time this problem was written, the highest-redshift qua-
sar known was CFHQS J2329–0301, which has a redshift z = 6.43.
(a) What was the scale factor a of the universe at the time the quasar
light we are observing now left the quasar?
The scale factor is related to the redshift by
(b) How old was the universe at the time the light left the quasar?
From Figure 24.3, log a = log(0.13) = −0.87 corresponds to log H0 t = −2.
Using equation (20.34), we have H0 t = 0.01, so
0.01
t= = 0.01(14 Gyr) = 140 Myr.
H0
Thus,
t 0.14 Gyr
= = 0.01.
tuniverse 13.5 Gyr
(c) What is the distance modulus of the quasar?
From Figure 24.5, m − M = 49 mag.
24.4. Suppose that star formation stops today, everywhere in the
universe.
(a) At what time tdie will the last stars die out?
(a) The main sequence lifetime of stars is τ ∝ M −1.62 for M < 0.7M (equation
13.79) and τ ∝ M −2.92 for M > 0.7M (equation 13.80). We normalize this
We can now use this to normalize the lower main sequence relationship. For
τ < 0.7M ,
1.62
τM 0.7
= 28.3 Gyr .
τ0.7M M
The lowest stellar mass is ∼ 0.05M, and its main sequence lifetime is
1.62
0.7
τ = 28.3 Gyr
0.05
≈ 200 Gyr = 2 trillion years.
24.5. Estimate how high the temperature of the universe must be for
proton–proton pair production to occur. What was the approximate
age of the universe when it had cooled enough for proton–proton pair
production to cease?
For γ + γ → p+ + p− to be important,
Eγ ≈ mp c2 = 938 MeV.
For convenience, change units on the Boltzmann constant from Joules to MeV,
J 1 eV
k = 1.38 × 10−23
K 1.6 × 10−19 J
eV 10−6 MeV
= 8.63 × 10−5 ×
K eV
−11 −1
= 8.63 × 10 MeV K .
Then
mp c 2 938 MeV
T = = = 1.1 × 1013 K.
k 8.63 × 10−11 MeV K−1
Equation (24.20) is
1/2
1/2
a = 2Ωr,0 H0 t .
a2 −1
t = 1/2
(H0 )
2 Ωr,0
(2.45 × 10−13 )2
= 4.4 × 1017
2(8.4 × 10−5 )1/2
= 1.4 × 10−6 s.
147
Revision History
2009 March 23: First complete version.