Thomas Gray
Thomas Gray
Graveyard school is a genre that has developed due to reactions created by the melancholic
strain that spread across Europe in the 17th century. The poetry of the period was so vain,
teaching only philosophy and optimism as a result of solitude or contemplation. Graveyard
poetry used this material as a foundation and expanded the range to a whole new level.
Although, many critics oppose the effectiveness of this school of poetry, there is no question
that it influenced gothic literature and
partially Romanticism.
● The major subject for graveyard poets was no doubt death; but, they used elements
like nostalgia, sorrow, brittle emotions, sadness, psychological battles, etc. to
produce works that are reflections of mortality and at the same time aesthetic to read
at.
● Graveyard poetry had clear detail and range that was lacking in the melancholic
poetry of the predecessors. In addition, the mention of tombstones, ghosts,
macabre descriptions made graveyard poetry interesting and effects long-lasting.
There are many poets and writers who identify themselves with graveyard poetry; however,
four crucial works have become the pillars of the movement.
● Thomas Gray – Elegy written in a Country Churchyard [1751]
● Thomas Parnell – Night Piece on Death [1721]
● Edward Young – Night Thoughts [1742-1745]
● Robert Blair – The Grave [1743]
THOMAS GRAY
● Notable Works: “An Elegy Written in a Country Church Yard” “Ode on a Distant
Prospect of Eton College” “The Bard” “The Progress of Poesy”.
INTRODUCTION
Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” was first published in 1751. Gray
may,however, have begun writing the poem in 1742, shortly after the death of his close
friend Richard West. An elegy is a poem which laments the dead.
Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” is noteworthy in that it mourns the death not
of great or famous people, but of common men. The speaker of this poem sees a country
churchyard at sunset, which impels him to meditate on the nature of human mortality. The
poem invokes the classical idea of memento mori, a Latin phrase which states plainly to all
mankind, “Remember that you must die.” The speaker considers the fact that in death, there
is no difference between great and common people. He goes on to wonder if among the
lowly people buried in the churchyard there had been any natural poets or politicians whose
talent had simply never been discovered or nurtured. This thought leads him to praise the
dead for the honest, simple lives that they lived.
Gray did not produce a great deal of poetry; the “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard,”
however, has earned him a respected and deserved place in literary history. The poem was
written at the end of the Augustan Age and at the beginning of the Romantic period, and the
poem has characteristics associated with both literary periods. On the one hand, it has the
ordered, balanced phrasing and rational sentiments of neoclassical poetry. On the other
hand, it tends toward the emotionalism and individualism of the Romantic poets; most
importantly, it idealizes and elevates the common man.
In the first stanza, the speaker observes the signs of a country day drawing to a close: a
curfew bell ringing, a herd of cattle moving across the pasture, and a farm laborer returning
home. The speaker is then left alone to contemplate the isolated rural scene.
The first line of the poem sets a distinctly somber tone: the curfew bell does not
simply ring; it “knells”—a term usually applied to bells rung at a death or funeral.
From the start, then, Gray reminds us of human mortality.
Now the land around me is glowing in the sunset but also fading away as I look at it.
There's a seriousness stillness hanging in the air, apart from the buzz of a flying beetle and
the tinkling of the sheep's bells, which is like their bedtime music.
The second stanza sustains the somber tone of the first: the speaker is not
mournful,but pensive, as he describes the peaceful landscape that surrounds him.
Even the air is characterized as having a “solemn stillness.”
Note that at no point in these three opening stanzas does Gray directly refer to death or a
funeral; rather, he indirectly creates a funeral atmosphere by describing just a few mournful
sounds.
Underneath those burly elm trees and the shade of that yew tree, there are mounds of moldy
dirt: each laying in a narrow room forever, the uneducated founders of this tiny village sleep.
It is in the fourth stanza that the speaker directly draws our attention to the graves in
the country churchyard. Two potentially conflicting images of death have
beenpresented here. Line 14 describes the heaps of earth surrounding the graves; in
order to dig a grave, the earth must necessarily be disrupted. Note that the syntax of
this line is slightly confusing. The sentence should be read, “Where the turf
heaves”—not “where heaves the turf”: Gray has inverted the word order. Just as the
earth has been disrupted, the syntax imitates the way in which the earth has been
disrupted. The “rude Forefathers” buried beneath the earth seem entirely at peace:
readers are told that they are laid in “cells,” a term which reminds us of the quiet of a
monastery, and that they “sleep.”
The sound of the scented breezes of morning, the swallow singing in a shed made of straw,
the rooster's sharp cry, or the echoes of a hunter's horn—these sounds will no longer wake
the dead from their humble resting places.
If the “Forefathers” are sleeping, however, the speaker reminds us that they will
never again rise from their “beds” to hear the pleasurable sounds of country life that
the living do. The term “lowly beds” describes not only the unpretentious graves in
which the forefathers are buried, but the humble conditions that they endured when
they were alive.
The fireplace will no longer burn brightly for these dead people, nor will with their busy wives
work in the evening to take care of them. Their children no longer will run over to celebrate
when their father has come home from work for the evening, or climb on his lap to get to be
the first to get a kiss.
The speaker then moves on to consider some of the other pleasures the dead will no
longer enjoy: the happiness of home, wife, and children.
When they were alive, these people often harvested crops with their farm implements. They
often plowed up difficult ground. How cheerfully they drove their farm animals over the field
as their plowed! How confidently they chopped down trees, which seems to bow as they fell
beneath the strokes of the axe.
The dead will also no longer be able to enjoy the pleasures of work, of plowing the
fields each day. This stanza points to the way in which the “Elegy Written in a
Country Churchyard” contains elements of both Augustan and Romantic poetry.
Poetry that describes agriculture—as this one does—is called georgic. Georgic verse
was extremely popular in the eighteenth century. Note, however, that Gray closely
identifies the farmers with the land that they work. This association of man and
nature is suggestive of a romantic attitude. The georgic elements of the stanza
almost demand that we characterize it as typical of the eighteenth century, but its
tone looks forward to the Romantic period.
Don't let ideas about ambition push you to make fun of the useful work these country folk
did. Don't make fun of their plain and simple joys, their unknown lives. Don't let feelings of
superiority make you smile scornfully at the short and simple biographies of poor people.
The next four stanzas caution those who are wealthy and powerful not to look down
on the poor. These lines warn the reader not to slight the “obscure” “destiny” of the
poor—the fact that they will never be famous or have long histories, or “annals,”
written about them.
The bragging implied by a rich family's coat of arms; the frills and traditions of the powerful;
all the things that beauty and wealth can give someone—death waits for all these things.
Even the most glorious lives still end in death.
This stanza invokes the idea of memento mori (literally, a reminder of mortality). The
speaker reminds the reader that regardless of social position, beauty, or wealth, all
must eventually die.
And you, you proud people, don't blame the poor if no memorials are erected on their graves
as ornaments that outline their achievements in life; or if they don't have a tomb with a long
hallway and a vaulted ceiling illustrated with all their accomplishments, echoing with the
sounds of mourners singing the praises of the dead.
The speaker also challenges the reader not to look down on the poor for having
modest, simple graves. He suggests, moreover, that the elaborate memorials that
adorn the graves of the “Proud” are somehow excessive. In this context, the word
“fretted” in line 39 has a double meaning: on the one hand, it can refer to the design
on a cathedral ceiling; on the other hand, it can suggest that there is something
“fretful,” or troublesome, about the extravagant memorials of the wealthy.
Can an urn decorated with events from the dead person's life, or a life-like sculpture of their
head, call the dead person's breath back into their body? Can honor bring their decaying
body back to life? Can flattery convince death not to come for someone?
The speaker observes that nothing can bring the dead back to life, and that all the
advantages that the wealthy had in life are useless in the face of death. Neither
elaborate funeral monuments nor impressive honors can restore life. Nor can flattery
in some way be used to change the mind of death.
Maybe in this unkempt patch of ground is buried someone who was once passionately filled
with heavenly fire. Maybe someone is buried here who could have ruled an empire or
brought music and poetry to new heights.
The speaker then reconsiders the poor people buried in the churchyard. He wonders
what great deeds they might have accomplished had they been given the
opportunity: one of these poor farmers, the speaker reasons, might have been a
great emperor; another might have “waked … the living lyre,”
or been a great poet or musician.
But they couldn't read or get an education, meaning they were never able to learn about
history. Cold poverty held back their inspiration and froze the creative parts of their minds.
The poor were never able to fulfill their political and artistic potential, however,
because they were uneducated—they never received the “Knowledge” that would
enable them to rule and to create. Instead, “Penury,” or poverty, “froze the genial
current of their soul.” That is, poverty paralyzed their ability to draw upon their
innermost passions—the very passions that could have inspired them to become
great poets or politicians.
Many gems that give off the most beautiful light are buried in dark, unexplored caves in the
ocean. Many flowers bloom unseen by anyone, wasting their beauty and scent on a
deserted place.
In a series of analogies, Gray observes that the talents of the poor are like a “gem”
hidden in the ocean or a “flower” blooming in the desert. Just as an unseen flower in
the desert is a “waste,” Gray suggests, the uneducated talents of the poor are also a
“waste,” because they remain unused and undeveloped.