Philippine Poll Watchers' Challenges
Philippine Poll Watchers' Challenges
One of the main highlights from last year’s event was Recently, efforts to conceptualize administrative
the 2022 Philippine National and Local Elections. The burdens occurred, which identifies the categories of
Philippine elections involve a lot of people interaction costs of access in public services (learning cost),
from poll workers and other deputized agencies. demanding application processes that require extensive
According to Education Secretary Leonor Briones, documentation and paperwork (compliance costs), and
756,083 poll workers from different institutions the increase in stress arising from program processes
participated in the recent election (Balita Online, (psychological cost) (Moynihan, Herd, & Harvey,
2022). Hence, studies have supported that poll workers 2015; Herd & Moynihan, 2019; Barnes, 2021).
played a significant part in obtaining a successful According to Barnes and Henly (2018), this
election administration as they provide a crucial public conceptualized administrative burden can undermine
administrative service (Burden & Milyo, 2015; Clark the effectiveness of the policy and negatively shape
& James, 2021; Lefterov, Ignatieva, Prykhodko, perceptions of the government.
Timchenko, Formaniuk, & Holina, 2021).
Moreover, concerns about electoral malpractice and
Poll watchers play a critical role in politics, given the integrity are still raised in many democracies in recent
significant role of elections. Poll watchers are years, and many of these occur in polling places (Clark
considered street-level bureaucrats− front-line & James, 2021). Also, issues regarding significant
government workers who interact directly with the levels of violence on polling day and even the
public and implement policies that are a crucial part of aftermath of voting add to the cruciality of the job of
the functioning of government (Nathan & White, poll watchers. At the same time, less research has
2019). This gives poll watchers serious and demanding studied the welfare of poll watchers towards these
responsibility that challenges and burdens them. As election challenges. This interests the researchers of
Burden, David, Mayer, and Moynihan (2012) stated in this study to investigate and examine the watcher’s
their study, all work has a specific set of demands, and lived experiences and challenges during election day.
all public officials experience some level of
administrative burden in their work. Accordingly, they This research will mainly explore three various ways.
defined administrative burden as an individual’s First, the study will examine the poll watchers’ lived
policy implementation experience as onerous, which experiences, challenges, and also their coping
signifies that burdens are distinct from rules. mechanisms on the day of the election. Second, this
Primarily, aspects of administrative burden are research will address how poll watchers keep their will
explored in different streams of research. However, to take the job despite the negative perceptions of the
there is not a broad discussion across prior work about government and the election process.
and were asked to express their voluntary support election day. It has been found that the most
through informed consent. The informed consent commonly stated reason for becoming a poll watcher
contained discussion in compliance with the protocol was because ‘the payment was good, ‘to help my
standard for data gathering. community,’ and because it became their ‘family
motive.’
Moreover, the confidentiality of this study is protected
under the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (R.A 10173). The payment was good
Thus, this assured the participants that the data
gathered and the responses collected in this research Most respondents claimed their initiative to be a poll
would be kept confidential and used for academic and watcher because the payment for its service was
research purposes only. seldom high. Hence, Participant 4 expresses her
motivation to work as a poll watcher because of the
Data Analysis Procedure incentive she will receive.
In this study, the researchers used Interpretative “Gusto ko lang, at saka sayang din ang kikitain ‘kong
Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to adequately pera.”
describe, interpret, and understand the research
participants' innermost reflection about their lived Likewise, Participant 2 mentioned that:
experience situations. IPA is a kind of approach
considered "participant-oriented," allowing the “Sa totoo lang kung tutuusin, dahil sa pera. Malaki
participants to express themselves free from distortion. kasi bigayan, may sahod kasi yon tapos makikita mo
The essential goal of this technique is to examine the kung pa’no nangyayari sa election pero primary is
research participants' life experiences and to describe pera talaga kasi may sahod ka don.”
the research findings through their lived experiences
(Alase, 2017). Thus, based on the participant’s responses, they
support the significance of material incentives on the
Moreover, this phenomenological study is also
volunteering motivations of poll watchers. A former
anchored on the Modified Van Kaam technique by
study also argues that incentive systems, such as
Moustakas to successfully obtain the research's
material incentives, are vital in bridging the gap
objective, which is to examine the lived experiences of
between individuals and organizations. A sort of
poll watchers and the challenges in their work. The
material gain provides material incentives either
Modified Van Kaam technique allows the researchers
through payment or career advancement. But, in most
to extract insights and meaning from the participants'
cases, there is unlikely to be any career advancement
experiences through face-to-face and tape-recorded
involved. Instead, it is conceivable that poll workers
interviews. Thus, this approach is claimed to be the
work on election day to earn extra money (Clark &
most effective and common for gathering relevant data
James, 2021).
in phenomenological research and significant in
identifying existential themes (Yeh & Chang, 2014). Based on a study, Filipino workers are described as
someone who value good pay, which is significantly
Results and Discussion correlated to the country's economic situation. Money
is the primary extrinsic motivator for Filipino workers
as they use their salaries to provide for themselves and
The following themes were identified from the their families. (Ilagan, Hechanova, Co, & Pleyto,
gathered results from the in-depth interviews. These 2014). Therefore, being a temporary employee, like a
themes include (1) The Ground, (2) The Encounter, (3) poll watcher, helps the majority of workers to make
The Burden, and (4) The Withstand. The findings of ends meet.
this study are grouped into themes derived from the
participants’ responses. Help my community
that aims to help her fellow Filipino to have a clean akong problema, goods ako. Masaya rin kasing mag-
election. volunteer ng taga-rito kasi nakakatulong ako.”
“Para mababtayan ko ren yung malinis na halalan, at Tablan (2021) stated that supporting one’s family is
para din sa mga ano naten, kababayan.” the major reason many people work, not just Filipinos.
If money is the number one extrinsic motivator, this is
Participant 9 also shares the initiative of poll workers because Filipinos use their salaries to provide for the
which were intertwined motivations driven by civic maintenance and education of their children and
responsibility, and public service. extended family. Therefore, some Filipino families
encourage their family members to apply to work with
“Kasi gusto ko ring makatulong. Matulungan lang them to gain the same incentives and use them for the
sila, mga pari at PPCRV.” family.
Lack of work activity may lead workers to feel poll watchers (Amegnran, 2017).
frustrated.
Buzzfeed
It's just a normal day!
Poll watchers often face a variety of challenges such as
For others like Participant 5, it's just like a normal day gossiping. It is unavoidable in the job of poll-watching
for them because they have done all the necessary to hear workplace gossip. Gossip that may pertain to
preparation for the upcoming election and prepared for the candidate they are supporting also leads them to
what will happen during the election. get into trouble. Respondent 8 commented that one of
the challenging aspects of being a poll watcher is the
“Maayos naman dahil naging handa naman ako bago negative gossip you may hear from other parties
ang araw ng election.”
“Nakakapagod din sya dahil may oras na naririnig mo
Participant 5 shows that being prepared and ready on yung nasa kabilang presinto na kuha ng ibang
your duty will make your work way more efficient and kandidato na nagpaparinig sayo ganon. May ibang
easier. poll watcher na nagpaparinig sa’yo na naaapektuhan
ako sa emosyonal pero hindi naman gaano.”
The Burden
Workplace gossip is defined as informal, negative, and
Poll watching is consequential in terms of the burden evaluative discussions among organization members
that it bears. Poll watchers provide front-line service, aimed at an organization member. Former studies have
which is crucial to the nature and quality of employed different perspectives to explain the impact
government services that citizens receive. Therefore, of negative workplace gossip. Some studies have
poll workers take significant responsibility, giving an confirmed the detrimental effect of gossip on targets’
undeniable burden to do their job well. attitudes and behaviors, such as reducing their
organization-based self-esteem, increasing emotional
Interviewers have noticed three subthemes that occur exhaustion, promoting negative mood, raising
throughout the interview. First, Grind hard− poll organizational cynicism, and causing a decline in
watchers work long hours to obtain their significant engagement (Cheng, Dong, Zhang, Shaalan, Guo, &
role. Second, Buzzfeed− this is about gossip roaming Peng, 2020).
around the area, affecting the poll watchers,
specifically in their emotional and psychological Cranky Villagers
aspects. Third, cranky villagers. Short-tempered voters
had become one of the significant challenges in Poll watchers take a significant responsibility to
dealing with poll watching. deliver quality elections to voters as the assigned front-
liners as they interact with the voters at polling places.
Grind hard Hence, voters demand exceptional work quality on
their part. However, unpredictable inconveniences
Poll watchers devote their time and effort to may arise along their job which may affect their
accomplish their assigned tasks, resulting in them efficiency. This includes unpredictable voter cases,
taking long hours of duty on election day. Respondent massive workloads, staff shortages, and inadequate
8 claimed that: voting materials and equipment (Amegnran, 2017).
Consequently, these inconveniences led voters to
“Dahil ang pagbibilang boto ay nakakapagod, dahil display negative attitudes and behaviors. Participant 8
minsan pa ay inaabot na ng umaga na siyang talagang claimed that
nakaka-mental drain dahil maghapon akong gising.”
“Hindi maiiawasan yung mga malimit na pag-aaway o
Most of the respondents also answered with the same init ng ulo”,
sentiment as Respondent 3,
Participant 8 also mentioned,
“Nakakapagod siya dahil... buong araw ka nasa
pwesto mo at nagbabantay.” “Yung iba [naman] is hindi naming makita yung mga
pangalan nila kasi nahihintuan sa commission of
Altogether the pace of activities, pressure from voters, election o di kaya lumipat sila ng tirahan nila. Akala
and the length of the workday definitely put a strain on nila dito pa rin sila sa place na ito, pero hindi. Yung
iba nagsisimula na sa pagawa ng mga away dahil Moreover, Participant 4 told that it is part of the job
hindi mahanap-hanap ang kanilang mga pangalan.” therefore there is nothing much to consider.
Participant 4 also admitted that dealing with ill- “Hindi ko na lang pinapansin kasi ganon talaga pag
tempered voters has affected her emotionally. botohan nasanay na rin ako, ilang beses na rin kasi
ako naging poll watcher.”
“Yung mga maiin it na ulo na bo tan te ang
n agpapah irap sa akin sa emo syon al.” I entertain myself.
Based on a recent study by Mulvaney (2021), poll Feelings of boredom occur regularly at work. It has
watchers reported being threatened and harassed by been shown that bare work, monotony, repetition, and
individuals on election day, which had an impact on underutilization of skills may induce work-related
the voting process. In some cases, poll watchers felt boredom (van Hooff & van Hooft, 2014). From a
disrespected and disregarded by the individuals who psychological perspective, boredom is an unpleasant
were disrupting the voting process. and demotivated effect characterized by a lack of
motivation or enthusiasm (Noury, Ahuja, Parker,
The Withstand Sturdy, & Tyler, 2020). Hence, according to research,
distractive behavior is one of the types of coping with
In this research, the interviewers have found adaptive work-related boredom. Distractive behavior is a
coping mechanisms to manage the burden of their job. behavior of employees at work that divert attention
Researchers have found four strategies they rely on to from work
cope: Stand firm, Mind my own business, Positivity is
a choice, and We distract ourselves to ease our Participant 2 expressed,“Nag iisip ako ng mga bagay
boredom. na mapaglilibangan habang nandon ako kasi boring
talaga na nagbabantay ka lang, siguro inoobserve ko
Stand firm
lang pano gumawa yung mga tao don, pano sila
Poll watching is not an easy job. Poll watchers magsulat mga ganon.”Therefore, diverting their
experience a range of emotions when working during interest from time to time helps them to endure their
elections. As Participant 1 pointed out, feeling of boredom at work.
Mind my own business Adona, N., & Gronke, P. (2018). Understanding the Voter
Experience. Democracy Fund. Washington, DC: Democracy Fund.
In some interviews, participants commented that they Atkeson, L. R., Kerevel, Y. P., Alvarez, R. M., & Hall, T. E. (2014).
keep themselves from the negatives carried by their Who asks for voter identification? Explaining poll-worker
work, rather stay focused on their duties, and remain discretion. The Journal of Politics, 76(4), 944-957.
emotionally resilient. Participant 10 simply stated, Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
(IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach.
“I shouldn’t be entertaining negative thoughts.” International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies.
International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies. 5(2), 9-19. ka kumakayod? Developing a Filipino needs theory of
motivation. Philippine journal of psychology, 47(1), 117-143.
Alvarez, R. M., Cao, J., & Li, Y. (2021). Voting Experiences,
Perceptions of Fraud, and Voter Confidence. Social Science Lefterov, V., Ignatieva, I., Prykhodko, I., Timchenko, O.,
Quarterly, 102(4), 1225-1238. Formaniuk, Y., & Holina, O. (2021). Psychological Peculiarities of
Styles of Professional Activity and the Level of Stress among
Amegnran, K. M. (2017). Assessing electoral process challenges Members of Election Commissions in Parliamentary Elections in
through poll workers' performance in sub-Saharan Africa- Ukraine. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and
Togo (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). Neuroscience, 12(1), 300-325.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Stress from election Luna, F (2022). Voters, poll watchers question glitches as broken
watching: How to cope.https://www.apa.org/topics/election-stress machines stall long lines at precincts.
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2022/05/09/2179864/voters-poll
Balita Online. DepEd: Higit 37k eskwelahan, magsisilbing polling -watchers-question-glitches-broken-machines-stall-long-lines-
centers sa botohan sa Mayo 9. precincts
https://balita.net.ph/2022/05/04/deped-higit-37k-eskwelahan-magsisi
lbing-polling-centers-sa-botohan-sa-mayo-9/ Matthews, K. K., & Kuzma, J. (2018). Coping strategies of poll
workers: Active coping strategies and emotion regulation. Journal of
Barnes, C. Y. (2021). “It takes a while to get used to”: The costs of Community Psychology, 46(6),
redeeming public benefits. Journal of Public Administration 7 5 1 – 7 6 5 . h t t p s : / / d o i . o rg / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / j c o p . 2 2 1 1 0
Research and Theory, 31(2), 295-310.
Montiel, C. J., Barbo, L., & Acosta, N. (2012). Philippine political
Barnes, C. Y., & Henly, J. R. (2018). “They are underpaid and culture and governance. Office of the Ombudsman.
understaffed”: How clients interpret encounters with street-level
bureaucrats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Molineaux, D. (2022). Stories from the polls around the country.
Theory, 28(2), 165-181.Burden, B. C., & Milyo, J. (2015). The https://thefulcrum.us/Elections/Voting/poll-workers-2370986025
quantities and qualities of poll workers. Election Law
Journal, 14(1), 38-46. Moura, T., & Gomes, A. (2017, June). Blockchain voting and its
effects on election transparency and voter confidence.
Bland, G., Green, A., & Moore, T. (2013). Measuring the quality of In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on
election administration. Democratization, 20(2), 358-377. digital government research (pp. 574-575).
Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative
(2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-
p e rc e p t i o n of p o l i c i e s : E v i d e n c e from e l e c t i o n state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and
administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741-751. Theory, 25(1), 43-69
Cheng, B., Dong, Y., Zhang, Z., Shaalan, A., Guo, G., & Peng, Y. Mulvaney, C. (2021, February 18). Challenges for Poll Watchers
(2020). When targets strike back: how negative workplace gossip During the 2020 Election. The National Law Review.
triggers political acts by employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 1- https://www.natlawreview.com/article/challenges-for-poll-watchers-
14. during-2020-election
Claassen, R. L., Magleby, D. B., Monson, J. Q., & Patterson, K. D. Nathan, N. L., & White, A. (2021). Experiments on and with street-
(2013). Voter confidence and the election-day voting
level bureaucrats. See Druckman & Green.
experience. Political Behavior, 35(2), 215-235.
Noury, L., Ahuja, S., Parker, M., Sturdy, A., & Tyler, M. (2020).
Clark, A., & James, T. S. (2021). Electoral administration and the
BOREDOM AT WORK.
problem of poll worker recruitment: Who volunteers, and
why?. Public Policy and Administration, 09520767211021203. Phillips, B (2022). What happened in the Philippine Elections?
https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/what-happened-philippine-el
Cohen, N., & Aviram, N. F. (2021). Street‐level bureaucrats and
ections
policy entrepreneurship: When implementers challenge policy
design. Public Administration, 99(3), 427-438. Porter, Ethan & Rogowski, Jon C (2018). Partisanship, Bureaucratic
Responsiveness, and Election Administration: Evidence from a Field
Freed, J. (2020, November 3). Coping Strategies for Election Poll
Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,
W a t c h e r s. R e t ri e v e d De c e m b e r 19, 2020.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/coping-the-covid-19-wor (), –. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy025
ld/202011/coping-strategies-election-poll-
watchers?fbclid=IwAR3W8Vvok0dMg7p3_jqCf8Vv1Dz9XFV2jbG Rodriguez, Alison; Smith, Joanna (2018). Phenomenology as a
x healthcare research method. Evidence-Based Nursing, (), ebnurs-
2018-102990–. doi:10.1136/eb-2018-102990
Hall, T. E., & Stewart III, C. (2013). Voter attitudes toward poll
workers in the 2012 election. Available at SSRN 2245353. Smith, A., Johnson, B., Brown, C., Jones, D., Williams, E., &
https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2245353 Taylor, F. (2020). Coping Strategies of Poll Watchers During an
Election. Journal of Elections and Voting Practices, 54(3), 267–
Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2019). Administrative burden: 272.https://doi.org/10.1177/1745769420954003
Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation.
Tablan, F. (2021). Filipino Virtue Ethics and Meaningful
Ilagan, J. R., Hechanova, M. R., Co, T., & Pleyto, V. (2014). Bakit Work. Humanities Bulletin, 4(1), 20-40.
Gerald T. Villanueva
Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. - Philippines
Galilee Jordan C. Ancheta
Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. - Philippines
Jayra A. Blanco
Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. - Philippines
Charles Brixter S. Evangelista
Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. - Philippines
Liezl R. Fulgencio
Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. – Philippines
Jhoselle Tus
Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. - Philippines