1
International Health Systems
                    LaShelle R Melton
    Department of Nursing, Jacksonville State University
          NU 710: Healthcare Policy and Finance
                    Dr Leigh Ann Keith
                     February 16, 2021
2
                                  International Health Systems
       The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast health care spending in the United
States to that of other countries and review why it is so much greater than in other high-income
countries. In 2016, the United States spent nearly twice as much as ten high-income countries on
medical care and performed less well on many population health outcomes. Contrary to some
explanations for high spending, social spending and health care utilization in the United States
did not differ substantially from other high-income nations. Prices of labour and goods, including
pharmaceuticals and devices, and administrative costs appeared to be the main drivers of the
differences in spending. Efforts targeting utilization alone are unlikely to reduce the growth in
health care spending in the United States; a more concerted effort to reduce prices and
administrative costs is likely needed (Papanicolas et al., 2018)
                                           Comparison Table
  Criteria   United States        Germany           Canada           United              Japan
     to                                                             Kingdom
 Evaluate
 Healthcar   Hybrid            Everyone must     National          National         Japan provide
 e           system            have health       Health            Health           equitable access
 Philosop    Patient-          insurance.        insurance         Service.         to necessary and
 hy          Centered          In Germany,       program.          Central and      adequate
             Care, In the      the role of       Canada's          Eastern          medical service.
             U.S.              nonprofit         health care       Europe           Japan breaks
             healthcare        organizations     system's          (CEE) that       down barriers
             system, has       in in-hospital    organisation      have             with consumers
             often been        healthcare is     is primarily      changed          by perceiving
             taken as an       deeply            determined        from socialist   and accepting
             ideal-type        intertwined       by the            healthcare       them merely as
             Private           with welfare.     Canadian          systems to       human beings
             model.            Organizations     Constitution,     social health    who share the
             However,          and facilities.   in which          insurance        same difficulties
             today it is                         roles and         systems          and recovery
             mainly                              responsibiliti    are currently    experiences.
             financed out                        es are            characterized    Everyone else
             of public                           divided           by               may be essential
             funds since                         between the       comparativel     to help build a
3
             it is heavily                        federal and   y weak actors     more inclusive
             tax-subsidized                       provincial    of the social     society.
                                                  and           insurance
                                                  territorial   systems and
                                                  governments   a high
                                                  .             proportion of
                                                                healthcare
Access to    Medicare          Health        Canada's           Sustainable       Japan’s statutory
Care         plays an          insurance is  publicly           Development       health insurance
Model--      outsize role in   mandatory in  funded             Goal (SDG)        system (SHIS)
(How         the U.S.          Germany.      health care        aims to           covers 98.3
does a       health care       Approximately system is          "ensure           percent of the
citizen of   system. The       86 percent of best               healthy lives     population,
this         program is the    the populationdescribed as       and promote       while the
country      nation's          is enrolled inan                 well-being        separate Public
get into     largest payer     statutory health
                                             interlocking       for all at all.   Social
the          of health care    insurance,    set of ten         Ages”.            Assistance
healthcar    services. It is   which providesprovincial                           Program, for
e system?    major support     inpatient,    and three                            impoverished
How do       for medical       outpatient,   territorial                          people, covers
they gain    education and     mental health,health                               the remaining
access to    rural             and           systems.                             1.7 percent.
personal     providers and     prescription  Known to
health       serves as the     drug coverage.Canadians as
services     testing ground    Nongovernmen  "Medicare,"
to           for innovative    tal insurers  the system
achieve      payment           handle the    provides
the best     models.           administration.
                                             access to a
health                                       broad range
outcomes                                     of health
?)                                           services.
Cost to      Medicare        Sickness funds Publicly            Since the         Japan’s statutory
Consume      payment         are financed    funded             development       health insurance
rs           policy often    through general health             and               system provides
             sets a          wage            expenditures       implementati      universal
             benchmark       contributions   accounted          on of the         coverage. It is
             for the         (14.6%) and a   for seven out      SDGs in           funded primarily
             commercial      dedicated,      of every 10        2015, global      by taxes and
             market, and it supplementary dollars spent         health            individual
             is usually held contribution    on health          spending has      contributions.
             up as a         (1% of wages,   care. The          increased,        Young children
             possible        on average),    remaining          reaching          and low-income
             model for       both shared by three out of        $7·9 trillion     older adults have
             universal       employers and every 10             (95%              lower
             coverage.       workers.        dollars came       uncertainty       coinsurance
                             Copayments      from private       interval 7·8–     rates, and there
4
                              apply to           sources and     8·0) in 2017     is an annual
                              inpatient          covered the     and is           household out-
                              services and       costs of        expected to      of-pocket
                              drugs, and         supplementa     increase to      maximum for
                              sickness funds     ry services     $11·0 trillion   health care and
                              offer a range of   such as         (10·7–11·2)      long-term
                              deductibles.       drugs, dental   by 2030. In      services based
                              Germans            care and        2017, in low-    on age and
                              earning more       vision care.    income and       income. There
                              than $68,000       governments     middle-          are also monthly
                              can opt-out of     pay for 65%     income           out-of-pocket
                              SHI and choose     of health       countries        maximums.
                              private health     expenditures    spending on
                              insurance          in Canada       HIV/AIDS
                              instead.                           was $20·2
                                                                 billion
Average          78.5              81.0              82.8            81.4               84.2
Age of
Death
Infant           5.8                3.4               4.5             4.3               2.0
Mortality
Rate
Obesity     Sixty-five per     4.0% of adults      A cross-       The U.K. is       Overweight/
percentag      cent in the    in Germany are      sectional         the most        obesity 21%
e                 U.S.         overweight or         study        overweight      higher in Japan,
                  The         obese. Men are      including         nation in       4% higher in
            prevalence of        more often         19,363           Western        China, 29%
              obesity was        affected by     adults aged         Europe.        higher in the
             significantly       overweight      18 years or         Twenty-           United
            greater among       than women,      more from          seven per      Kingdom, and
            women living       with 43.3% of       the 2004        cent of the     24% higher in
                   in          men having a       Canadian         population        the United
            nonmetropolit      BMI between       Community           are now        States, all P
             an statistical    25 kg/m2 and          Health         clinically     values < 0.05.
               areas. The         30 kg/m2,         Survey,        obese, and
            prevalence of       compared to       cycle 2.2.       another 36
            severe obesity         women             Ultra-       per cent are
            in non-MSAs          (28.8%). In      processed       overweight,
              was higher       Germany, the      food intake      making the
             than in large     prevalence of          was          combined
            MSAs among            obesity is      estimated      figure among
            men (9.9% vs            18.1%        using daily     the highest in
                 4.1%,                              relative       the world.
             respectively)                          energy
                women.                            intake of
5
                                                     ultra-
                                                   processed
                                                      food
 Major          Coronary        Coronary Heart      Coronary        Coronary        Coronary Heart
 Diseases         Heart         Disease, Lung        Heart            Heart         Disease, Stroke
 Affecting       Disease,        Cancer and         Disease,         Disease,            and
 the           Alzheimer’s          Stroke        Lung Cancer      Alzheimer’s      Flu/Pneumonia
 Populatio      and Lung                           and Stroke       and Lung
 n               Disease                                             Cancer
                                With Coronary
                  With          Heart Disease     With Cancer         With
                Coronary          being the        being the       Alzheimer’s      With Coronary
              Heart Disease      #1cause of       #1cause of       & Dementia       Heart Disease
                being the           death            death         being the #1       being the
               #1cause of                                            cause of      #1cause of death
                  death                                               death.
                             Most Effective International Health Plan
       I believe I favour Japan as having the most effective healthcare system in the world in my
research. This country has the lowest infant mortality rate of 2.0, and although coronary heart
disease is the number one cause of death, this country has the longest life expectancy of 84.2.
Japan also have low cost health insurance that is funded primarily by taxes and individual
contributions. Four years ago, Japan celebrated 50 years of good health achievement at low cost
and increasing equity for its population. In 1961, at the beginning of a period of rapid economic
development, while the country was still relatively poor (with a gross domestic product [GDP]
half the size of Britain's), Japan reached full health insurance coverage of its population. In the
next half-century, it continued to develop its health system and improve equity, even applying
this principle of universal health coverage in global health diplomacy. Japan followed a
nonlinear path to universal coverage. Previous Japanese policymakers were sometimes motivated
to develop the health system for political economy reasons that were unrelated to health. Since
1986, Japan has ranked first in the world in women's life expectancy at birth, which reached 87
6
years in 2014. In addition to improving health outcomes, Japan's social insurance system has
made incremental improvements in inequity through cross-subsidies and tax transfers, which
contributed to income redistribution in addition to risk pooling. As many countries have done,
Japan expanded health coverage population group by population group through policies designed
for different groups with differing coverage levels, thereby creating disparities and problems of
fairness (Reich & Shibuya, 2015).
                                        Recommendations
         The first recommendation would be, Equal and Fair Healthcare access for all. Although
cancer mortality rates declined in the United States in recent decades, some populations
experienced little benefit from advances in cancer prevention, early detection, treatment, and
survivorship care. Some cancer disparities between people of low and high socioeconomic status
widened during this period. Many potentially preventable cancer deaths continue to occur, and
disadvantaged populations bear a disproportionate burden (Alcaraz et al. 2020). An association
between social and neighbourhood characteristics and health outcomes has been reported but
remains poorly understood due to complex multidimensional factors across geographic space.
The consequences of social determinants of health (SDOH) increasingly dominate public health
discussions in the United States. Population health outcomes have not kept pace with those of
other developed nations despite higher per-person spending for medical services (Kolak et al.
2020).
         My second recommendation would be a universal fee for services. The United States has
a complex governmental public health system. Agencies at the federal, state and local levels all
contribute to protecting and promoting the population's health. However, whether the modern
public health system is well situated to deliver essential public health services is an open
7
question. In some part, its readiness relates to how agencies are funded and to what ends. A mix
of Federalism, home rule, and incident has contributed to a siloed funding system in the United
States, whereby health agencies are given particular dollars for particular tasks. Little
discretionary funding remains. Furthermore, tracking how much is spent, by whom, and on what
is notoriously challenging. This review outlines the challenges associated with estimating public
health spending and explains the known sources of funding used to estimate and demonstrate the
value of public health spending (Leider et al. 2018).
       And my third and last recommendation would be independent care provided by nurse
practitioners in all fifty states. You may say why this would be a recommendation, my belief is
that if more nurse practitioner were allowed to practice independently, it would impact health
care cost and access to care. There is a significant variation across states in nurse practitioner
(N.P.) scope of practice moderated by state regulations. The purpose of this study was to
synthesize the evidence from studies on the impact of state N.P. Practice regulations on U.S.
health care delivery outcomes (e.g., health care workforce, access to care, utilization, care
quality, or cost of care), guided by Donabedian’s structure, process, and outcomes framework.
The results indicate that expanded state N.P. Practice regulations were associated with greater
N.P. supply and improved access to care among rural and underserved populations without
decreasing care quality. This evidence could guide policymakers in states with more restrictive
N.P. practice regulations when they consider granting greater practice independence to N.P.s
(Yang et al. 2020).
                                             Conclusion
       In conclusion, this assignment has opened my eyes to many things to include life
expectancy and obesity. When I review the leading cause of death, it was insightful how, in three
8
of the five countries, Coronary Heart Disease was the leading cause of death; however, the life
expectancy differed. This assignment helps me have more insight into how important it is as a
future doctoral prepared provider to impact healthcare and push towards autonomy as a
healthcare provider. Doctor of Nursing Practice programs prepares nurse leaders for unique roles
to address healthcare needs across the quality spectrum. However, additional mentoring and
training in implementation science and analytical skills are needed to effectively lead system-
wide quality initiatives (Reynolds et al. 2021).
         The program's strengths included the in-depth mentoring by faculty and relationships
built across the more extensive health system. Both scholars and the planning team noted that the
scholars' system-wide project was relevant, timely, and quality-focused. This innovative DNP
post-doctoral program leveraged DNP-prepared nurse leaders' skill-sets to lead system-wide
quality improvement initiatives explicitly tailored to healthcare organizations (Reynolds et al.
2021).
9
                                           References
Alcaraz, K. I., Wiedt, T. L., Daniels, E. C., Yabroff, K. R., Guerra, C. E., & Wender, R. C.
       (2020). Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health
       equity in the United States: a blueprint for practice, research, and policy. CA: a cancer
       journal for clinicians, 70(1), 31-46.
Hales, C. M., Fryar, C. D., Carroll, M. D., Freedman, D. S., Aoki, Y., & Ogden, C. L. (2018).
       Differences in obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level
       among adults in the United States, 2013-2016. Jama, 319(23), 2419-2429.
Kolak, M., Bhatt, J., Park, Y. H., Padrón, N. A., & Molefe, A. (2020). Quantification of
       neighbourhood-level social determinants of health in the continental United States. JAMA
       network open, 3(1), e1919928-e1919928.
Life Expectancy Research. (2020). World Life Expectancy.
       https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/life-expectancy-research
10
Nardocci, M., Leclerc, B. S., Louzada, M. L., Monteiro, C. A., Batal, M., & Moubarac, J. C.
       (2019). Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Canada. Canadian Journal
       of Public Health, 110(1), 4-14.
Papanicolas, I., Woskie, L. R., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Health care spending in the United States
       and other high-income countries. Jama, 319(10), 1024-1039.
Reich, M. R., & Shibuya, K. (2015). The future of Japan's health system—sustaining good health
       with equity at a low cost. New England Journal of Medicine.
Reynolds, S. S., Howard, V., Uzarski, D., Granger, B. B., Fuchs, M. A., Mason, L., & Broome,
       M. E. (2021). An innovative DNP post-doctorate program to improve quality
       improvement and implementation of science skills. Journal of Professional Nursing,
       37(1), 48-52.
Schienkiewitz, A., Mensink, G., Kuhnert, R., & Lange, C. (2017). Overweight and obesity
       among adults in Germany.
Tanaka, K. (2019). Experiences of community mental health nurses in Japan as the basis of their
       nursing philosophies. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 55(4), 636–643.
       https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12386
Wendt, C., Frisina, L., & Rothgang, H. (2009). Healthcare System Types: A Conceptual
       Framework for Comparison. Social Policy & Administration, 43(1), 70–90. https://doi-
       org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00647.x
Yang, B. K., Johantgen, M. E., Trinkoff, A. M., Idzik, S. R., Wince, J., & Tomlinson, C. (2020).
       State Nurse Practitioner practice regulations and U.S. health care delivery outcomes: A
       systematic review. Medical Care Research and Review, 1077558719901216.
11
Zhou, L., Stamler, J., Chan, Q., Van Horn, L., Daviglus, M. L., Dyer, A. R., & INTERMAP
       Research Group. (, 2019). Salt intake and prevalence of overweight/obesity in Japan,
       China, the United Kingdom, and the United States: the INTERMAP Study. The
       American journal of clinical nutrition, 110(1), 34-40.