IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK

(SCOTT WEEDEN, a single man),

(BSI Financial, a Texas Corporation),
(JRW Estate and Trust, a Florida Trust),
(Web Sharp Studios I.N.C, a Deleware Company),
(Plaintiffs, )
-vs-

(Jeff Stenman, auction orchestrator;)

(Quality Loan I.N.C, a Washington Corp;)
(Defendants,)

Deposition Upon Written Submission

of

SCOTT WEEDEN
July 15th, 2023
1200 Franklin St, Vancouver, WA 98660
Vancouver Washington

[ UNSEALED ]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ SEALED AND CONFIDENTIAL]

Court Record #: ( __________________________)

Court Reporter: Can you tell me in what capacity you are employed?
Scott Weeden: I am a computer programmer and founder of Web Sharp Studios I.N.C.

EXAMINATION

Q. Mr. Weeden could you please state your full name and address for the record
A. Scott Weeden, 4927 NE HOLMAN ST PORTLAND OR, 97218

Q. May I have the spelling of your last name?

A. W as in Whisky, E as in Echo, E as in Echo, D as in Delta, E as in Echo, N as in November
Q. Are you employed by Web Sharp Studios, one of the plaintiffs?
A. Yes

Q. And can you tell me the capacity that you're employed by the company?
A. I create PASS tools and templates which are demonstrated on GitHub

Q. What are PASS tools?

A. It stands for "Platform as a service" and also PASS is short for password and passport. So its a
demonstration of authentication and authorization of enterprise applications across multiple platforms.
PASS with 'pass' if you like.

Q. Are you a licensed attorney?

A. Pass for Pass. Yes. I am not licensed in Washington.

Q. What jurisdictions are you licensed in?

A. Well, Florida I am granted powers of attorney. Oregon is where my business is licensed.

Q. What is the nature of your motion?

A. To seek a judicial injunction in the AUGUST 10TH sale of my property that is taking place without my
consent.

Q. What property is being sold without your consent?

A. The home I bought, paid in full, and invested in at 4927 NE Holman St.

Q. What investments and improvements did you make to the property?

A. I purchased and paid for new stainless steal appliances in the kitchen. New toilets in three
bathrooms. New carpet upstairs. Installed ethernet (CAT5) wiring throughout, installed a "Servers" in the
downstairs closet for Web Sharp Studios . All in all 100-200k dollars I invested in the property.

Q. How is the property being sold without your consent?

A. Zillow is advertising a "non-judicial" auction on the steps of the courthouse August 10th and Jeff
Stenman has sent me threatening letters. Many people are under the false assumption that the property
is for sale. The plaintiffs are seeking relief through summary order and injunction

Q. In what way is this different from foreclosure?

A. I have not signed or agreed to any such sale of my property. Nor does BSI want to participate in such
a sale. A non-judicial sale without the owners consent and without the grantors knowledge is canonical
to grand larceny. Jeff Stenman has admitted that he is attempting grand larceny by sending harassing and
threatening letters. He is wanted for questioning similar to his involvment with the Reiner v. Northwest
Trustee case of King county where it was found that he was also making false representations and
baseless claims with idol threats.

Q. Why are you requesting an injunction in Vancouver ?

A. Because I'm temporarily residing in vancouver washington until it is safe to return to my home. He is
the legal representative of a company claiming to participate in the non-judicial sale against an owners
with. We are unaware of what role Jeff Stenman plays in all of this unless he is the lender and grantors
of the orginal loan which was a lump sum payment of 308,000 to Gene and Sherry Krieger the previous
owners whom I purchased the home from. However that grantor, which I claim he is not, would need to
submit proof of the lump sum payment to the court, since he would only be at best a minoritiy and
partial owner making claim. Myself as trustee and Jim as grantor are the estate and trust which have
legally occupied, invested and lived in while making payments in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the original loan. The trust lends me money as partial ownership in the property I own so
that their assets which would otherwise be taxable as capital gains be reinvested for the future benefit
of the grantors grand daughter. BSI simply services the loan. BSI is not foreclosing at this time because
they are not the asset owner. Perhaps Mr Stenman confused the servicer of assets with whom owns the
assets.

Q. You admit that the terms and conditions of the loan, or "the instrument" have not been met for the
property at which you reside?
A. Yes. And so does BSI Financial. That's why they've taken the 5th.

Q. What terms and conditions have not been met?

A. BSI failed to record the transfer of escrow upon assuming my loan. Plaza Home mortgage has
submitted proof and attorneys for both sides are aware of the consent order by the United States
Consumer financial protection bureau "Affected consumers" such as myself are named as the class
action litigant, who can accept payment if BSI will apply the payment to the balance of the loan. A
dispute arose between myself and BSI after BSI began reporting my payments as late to the credit
agencies. When they were asked why, a representative from BSI claimed there was $300 / month tax
increase. In fact they had failed to record the surplus escrow sent to them from plaza home mortgage.
They eventually corrected the error so there is no longer a need for a floor payment. It was an honest
mistake on their part, but now we're confused who Jeff Stenman is representing and why he is
auctioning the property he doesn't own which was sold in part to the JRW estate and trust.

Q. So the terms and conditions were not met by the lender?

A. No. The mortgage servicer violated the terms and conditions of the loan by violating the law. The
terms and conditions of the loan are subjec to the law as all agreements are. That does not necessarily
place the borrower in default. It merely places the servicer as inadequate to provide such services. If
Mr. Stenman is viaing for positition to become that servicer he can send payments to the JRW Estate
who is now partial owner. But he cannot auction a property he does not own and he certainly cannot
evict the owners tenant.

Q. Why are you charging Mr. Stenman with larceny ?

A. I'm sorry, attempted Grand Larceny. Because hes' igrnoring my voicemails , and continues to send
threatening letters, making demands which he has no grounds in claim.

Q. What irreperable damages are you claiming will happen if the auction is allowed to take place?
A. People have a tendancy to believe what they see on a computer screen. Especially if it's repeated
over multiple sources. Mr. Stenman has collaborated with several online sources such as Zillow and
service auction link as he did in a similar case in King County in 2012. Either that or we have a copy cat
on our hands.

Q. Who are you accusing Mr. Stenman of collaborating with ?

A. Mr. Stenman has collaborated with service auction link, zillow, and other sources according to the
letters he sent to my home. He admits to witness tampering through harassing and threatening letters in
whihc he admits to participating in grand larceny. I'm unsure if he is the unwitting participant which is
foolish enough to bring suitcases of cash to downtown Portland or if he is the person orchestrating the
felony.

Q. Who owns the property in question?

A. The property does not belong to Jeff Stenman. If this auction were to happen on August 10th it would
compel BSI to testify against themselves in direct violation of the 5th amendment , which they have
chosen to exercise. A court ordered injunction prevents Jeff Stenman from commiting a criminal act
(either knowingly or unknowingly) and/or becoming the victim of a non-judicial sale while notifying
parties that might wish to particiapte in the sale should be notified that without consent of the owners
up to 100% of their investment could be lost wiithout any refund of payments.

Q. If this is not criminal why ....?

A. (Interupts ) The threatening letters Jeff sends to lawful occupants of the property they own is normally
considered harassment but in this case it's also witness tampering. That is criminal. The District Attorney
doesn't have time for such foolish games. A petition for injunction is the only relief parties which are
conducting lawful business can seek.

Q. How can you be certain that BSI did not disclose this information to Quality Loan of Washington since
they remain silent?
A. Again, because the registered agent for Qaulity Loan in the state of Oregon has verified in a phone call
he placed to me after a letter I sent to him confused them for being the registered agent of BSI in
Oregon. He had no knowledge of a Jeff Stenman. Any rational thinker must therefore conclude Jeff
Stenman is taking part in the repeat of his actions in the Reiner v. Northwest Trustee of Alaska in 2012.
The company he represents in Washington can make a $36,500 payment on behalf of BSI to myself,
however the JRW estate as partial owner and is not selling its stake at this time. He would need to make
two separate payments and record two separate deed of trusts signed agreed to by all owners before a
third partial ownership could be recorded. Neither have occured.

Q. What is the $36,500 check from the JRW Estate and Trust to the court?
A. The loss mitigation department at BSI has mistakenly named HUD as the grantor in the partial claim
deed of trust. HUD is not the grantor. Unless the government is seeking eminent domain and as far as I
know BSI hasn't invoked eminent domain. The city would need to be seeking eminent domain on all of
the townhouses in the HOA. Not just mine. It's more likely that BSI attorneys are fresh out of law school
or unfamiliar with it's history and use in Portland oregon. Eminent domain is one method of lawful
transfer without the owners consent but it's historically used in Portland only on vacant property that
has fallen into misrepair where its owner cannot be reached. The history of eminent domain can take a
much more brow raising and questionable tone in more racially segmented areas of the country.
However, Cully is not racially segmented. My neighbors are hispanic on my left, asian american across
the street, homosexual to my right, black two doors to my left and black two doors to my right as well as
behind my home. And I am sill the peaceful resident, occupant and owner, trustee (not grantor) in the
partial ownership of the property in which I reside. The occupant can be reached at 971-444-2625. A
mortgage servicer won't be necessary at this time because BSI continues to hold an excess according to
statements. And Multnomah County has been paid twice.

Q. Who is the grantor or partial owner of the property?

A. The JRW Estate is the grantor and the trustee submits payment as proof of funds and evidence of
partial deed in ownership of said instrument. Partial claim deed of trust is thereby executed and
recorded lawfully by both grantor and trustee as joint owners of the property at 4927 NE Holman St.
The payment to clark county court is to amend the error in recording that occured when BSI invoked
eminent domain through HUD. HUD did not release any funds. thereby releasing BSI as the mortgage
servicer and any further liability or responsibiltity in regards to the CPFB settlement. If BSI could
accurately reflect the payoff with all three credit agencies in order to prevent further
miscommunications that would be appreciated.

Q. Who is the trustee of the JRW Estate?

A. I am Scott Weeden. Jim's sister is the alternate trustee should anything happen to me. Jims
grandaughter is the beneficiary and becomes owner at the age of majority.

Q.What consent order are you speaking of?

A. The consent order was a notice to BSI legal , that consent must come from either the grantor and or
the borrower in order to foreclose on property. Since BSI is not the asset owner in the cases that were
file by complaints , I suspect BSI was just doing their job as a mortgage servicer. The complaints were
likely the result of misrepresentations being made such as in Reiner v. Northwest Trustee where Mr.
Stenman was also questioned about his capacity and role. The banks had not invoked a foreclosure and
neither the asset owners or debtors were in default. The occupants, were simply mislead by the false
representations of Mr. Stenman who had obtained confidential information. King county court failed to
issue an injunction notifiying participating parties of the auction and through Mr. Stenmans false
representations serious injury occured.

A. What permits the trustee to transfer assets from the JRW Trust?
Q. It's not a transfer of assets. It's a real estate purchase. The trustee is required to manage the assets
of the trust at a reasonable risk to growth. Real estate is a reasonable risk, and a partial claim deed of
trust recorded with the court is record of partial ownership which I as the owner consent to.

As for Jeff Stenman he may continue to claim to take part in a non-judicial auction in the sale of
properties he does not own. However, if he is commiting computer crimes in the unlawful search and
seizure of private information that was not disclosed he should submit a non-disclosure agreement or be
aware that he is further implicated. I would request that he submit proof of the $308,000 lump sum
payment he made to either plaza home mortgage or the previous owners Gene and Sherry Kreiger.
Otherwise we have no further need for ongoing harassment and he has no grounds to bring such claim.

(Sworn testimony available )