Artificial Lift (Overview)
Artificial Lift (Overview)
Summary
This paper gives guidelines to assist in the selection of One serious limitation to artificial lift installations has
artificial lift methods. The most important guideline is been the installation of small casing sizes, which limits
determination of the flow rates possible by each method. the installation to specific tubing sizes to obtain the ob-
This requires preparation of pressurelflow rate diagrams jective flow rate and, in particular, limits the size of
combining well-inflow performance relationships with retrievable gas lift equipment and/or pumping equip-
tubing intake curves. The tubing intake curve includes ment. The installation of gas-lift mandrels that accept
pressure loss in the complete piping system and/or only I-in. (2.5-cm) OD gas-lift valves is common in the
pressure gains by the pumping method. Many other fac- U.S., and serious limitations on gas passage volumes are
tors other than rate, such as location, retrievability by imposed on the system with this small valve. Also, the
wireline, corrosion, paraffin, scale deposition, cost, better performance characteristics of the IIh-in.
operating life, and others, influence the final selection of (3.8I-cm) OD valve are lost. For the pumping systems,
lift equipment. the smaller capacity pumps must be used in the smaller
Introduction casing sizes, and sometimes the advantage of retrievable
pumps is lost.
This paper provides an overview of artificial lift systems Surface-space limitations become an important factor.
and gives guidelines indicating when one system is better For example, if large compressors for gas lift or large
to use than another. Advantages and disadvantages are generators for electrical pumping are anticipated for off-
given with examples in the selection oflift methods. shore platforms, provisions must be made in the original
This list represents the relative standing of lift systems design to allow for both weight and space on the plat-
based on the number of installations throughout the forms. Some engineers are invariably optimistic about
world: (1) sucker rod pumping (beam pumping), (2) gas natural flow in the planning stage, and in many instances
lift, (3) electric submersible pumping, (4) hydraulic they still maintain that artificial lift will not be required
piston pumping, (5) hydraulic jet pumping, (6) plunger during the life of a field. This leads to very poor plan-
(free-piston) lift, and (7) other methods. This differs ac- ning, especially on offshore facilities.
cording to field, state, and country. In the design of artificial lift systems for a well, it is
New lift systems are being developed and tested con- recommended that it initially be treated as if it were a
tinually. The lifting of heavy viscous crude oils requires flowing well-i.e., a production systems graph should
special attention, and methods designed specifically for be prepared to see if the well is capable of flowing and, if
this purpose are being tested. Wells located offshore and it is, at what rate. The artificial lift analysis can be placed
in deep water present specific problems, and surface- on the same plot. Numerous flowing wells will show in-
space limitations become important. The artificial lift creased flow rates when placed on artificial lift.
method should be considered before the well is drilled. The purpose of any artificial lift system is to create a
Obviously this cannot be done on wildcat wells, but it predetermined tubing intake pressure such that the reser-
must be done on all subsequent development wells. The voir may respond and produce the objective flow rate.
drilling program must be set out to ensure hole sizes that The design and analysis of any lifting system can be
permit adequate casing and tubing sizes. divided into two main components. The first is the reser-
0149-213618210010-9979$00.25
voir component (inflow performance relationship),
Copyright 1982 Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME which represents the well's ability to produce fluids. The
2384 JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
TABLE 1-RELATIVE ADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS·
*Reprinted with permission from S. Gibbs. Nabla Corp., Midland, TX, with modifications by K. Brown. 1
second component represents the entire piping and ar- plan, surface facilities, location, available power
tificial lift system. This includes separator, flowline, sources, operating problems, completion type, automa-
flowline restrictions such as chokes, tubing string, tub- tion, operating personnel, service availability, and
ing string restrictions such as safety valves, and the ar- economics. Tables I and 2 I summarize the advantages
tificial lift mechanism itself. Tubing intake pressures and the disadvantages of the principal methods that are
then can be determined for varying flow rates, and when commonly used.
this intake curve is placed on the same plot as the IPR
curve, the rate for a particular lift method can be deter- Factors To Consider in Design
mined.
These factors should be considered in the selection of Liquid Productive Capacity of the Well
artificial lift equipment: producing characteristics, fluid The desired rate from a particular well is the most
properties, hole characteristics, long-range recovery significant factor in selecting the lift method. It is impor-
OCTOBER 1982 2385
TABLE 2-RELATIVE DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS'
• Reprinted with permission from S. Gibbs, Nabla Corp., Midland, TXt with modifications by K. Brown. 1
RATE ~
RATE~
•
PRESSURE STABLE
RATE
.
PRESSURE
RATE~
RATE
b
~ •
PRESSURE
RATE~
e
Fig. 4-(a) dead well, (b) dead well, (c) dead or severe heading well, (d) well flowing at Position 2, (3) stable flow.
the separator pressure controls the suction pressure to the a logical solution point. The tubing intake pressure curve
compressor and, hence, controls horsepower re- represents the entire piping system, including separator
quirements. pressure, flowline, any restrictions, and the tubing.
By taking the solution at the surface (Fig. 9), the pip-
Gas-Lift Well. The preparation of tubing intake curves ing system has been separated. One curve represents the
is more complex for gas-lift wells. This is because the in- separator pressure and flowline; the other curve incor-
jection gas/liquid ratio becomes an additional unknown porates the tubing string and IPR of the well. Both solu-
quantity. Figs. 8 and 9 show typical continuous flow tions may be advisable.
gas-lift system plots, including a horizontal flowline. A final gas-lift well performance curve of oil flow rate
For gas-lift wells, the solution point to determine rate vs. gas injection rate can be obtained from either plot.
usually is taken at one of two nodes, at the bottom of the This final plot is essential for optimization (Fig. 10). For
well or at the top of the well. Figs. 8 and 9 show the optimal allocation of gas to one well of a group, this type
solution to the same problem taken at both nodes. If the of curve is necessary.
solution point is taken at the bottom of the well, the well
capability can be isolated. For IPR's at different average Pumping Systems. The preparation of tubing intake
reservoir pressures, the node at the bottom of the well is curves for pumping systems can be relatively simple, for
2388 JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
SURFACE
CHOKE
SAFETY
VALVE
a
SEPARATOR
o PRESSURE
ISOLATED
SEPARATOR PRESSURE
SEPARATOR
t
PRESSURE SEPARATOR
LENGTH PRESSURE
I
+ PRESSURE
6P
CHOKE 2
DOWNSTREA",M~__~~____~ 3
OF CHOKE - WELLHEAD
PRESSURE
o
PRESSURE +
b
Fig. 7-Effect of separator pressure.
o
+ r
2000
400
o TUBING INTAKE
PRESSURE + PRESSURE
o 400 800 I
c PIIODUCTION ..ATE leLPD'
Fig. 5-(a) total piping system, (b) flowline pressure traverse, Fig. 8-Gas-lift solution node at bottom of well.
(c) tubing pressure traverse.
a well pumping no gas, to rather complex, for a well that system is shown in Fig. 11 along with the corresponding
must pump gas. The solution is easily understood by tubing intake curve. Note that the appearance of the tub-
thinking of the pump as a downhole compressor that per- ing intake curve is the same as for gas lift or for the flow-
mits fluids to enter at one pressure and discharges them ing well. A change in the pump size will shift the tubing
at another pressure. However, a pump is a very poor intake curve.
compressor when gas is present, and with liquids there is For pumping systems handling gas, it is important to
little or no compression, although a high ilp is prepare IPR curves for total fluid intakes (Fig. 12).
developed. The problem becomes more complex when
the pump is set up the hole compared with being set on Gas Production Expected From the Well
bottom. A typical pressure traverse for a pumping The amount of gas produced and, hence, the gaslliquid
OCTOBER 1982 2389
GCR ratio is a significant factor in selecting the artificial lift
2000
method. If high volumes of gas must pass through the lift
1200
mechanism (Fig. 12), a reduction in liquid capacity can
be expected for all pumping systems, and gas lift is one
1200
1000
of the most logical choices. Complete gas-lock may oc-
900
000 cur in some pumping systems, but in any event the gas
700
600 occupies volume that must be displaced. The ability of
000
400
300 TUBING SIZE: 2.441".I.D.
some pumping systems to handle gas is suspect. Elec-
FCOWI.INE SIZE' 2.5OO".I.D.
CASING PMSSURE' 900 PSI
trical pumps start losing efficiency when the in-situ gas
PI' 5.000 8/D/PSI
volume to be handled exceeds 10% of the total fluid
pumped. Sucker rod pumps may gas-lock completely
with high gas production. Hydraulic piston pumps
o 1100 should not gas-lock, but they must displace the gas and,
TUBING INTAKE
CURVE
t
PRESSURE
t
PRESSURE
RATE"
c RATE +
Fig. 11-(a) typical pump installation, (b) pressure traverse for
pumping system, (c) pumping-system-rate solution at Fig. 12-IPR curves for total fluid production including gas.
bottom of we".
4500
FEET
1
FEET
7500
11
FEET PUMP ON BOTTOM
PI· 2.0
Pr ·3000 psi
Pwh·160 psi
Po .1200psi
1~t>fP
-..4--+---+*+--+- 6P p ' Po -Opsi • 1200-0
PUMP AT EFFECTIVE L PUMP AT 10000 FEET
L-
12000
FEET Po' 3200 psi
12000 LIFT POINT
FEET
PUMP INTAKE PRESSURE· 0 6PpuMP ' 2000 psi
~
,,?--+--P1NTAKE' 1200 psi
PI • 2.0
PI • 2.0
Pwf ·2000 psi
b d
Fig. 13-(a) effective lift piston, (b) pump set at effective lift, (c) pump set at bottom, (d) pump set at 10,000 ft.
assume that the pump must lift from its setting depth, the 4,500 ft (1371.6 m), such as tubing loss, flowline loss,
unit may be designed for greater horsepower than re- and separator pressure.
quired. For example, if a well is 12,000 ft (3657.6 m) If we assume that the pumping system is at 10,000 ft
deep, has a static pressure of 3,000 psi (20.68 MPa), PI (3048 m), or even on bottom at 12,000 ft (3657.6 m), the
is 2 (assumed constant), gas liquid ratio = 300 scflbbl pump must lift only from the effective lift point of 4,500
(53.5 std m3/m3)' wellhead pressure is 160 psi (1.10 ft (1371. 6 m). Another way to visualize this concept is to
MPa), and is completed with 2 V2-in. (6.35-cm) tubing, note that the pump must create a certain discharge
what is the depth of effective lift for a rate of 2,000 BID pressure to overcome all pressure losses and head above
(317.97 m 3 Id)? The flowing bottomhole pressure (BHP) the effective lift point, which is also the /1p that the
required for the well to yield this rate is pump must create if it is set at the effective lift point. In
3,000-(2,000/2)= 2,000 psi (13.79 MPa). The effec- the previous example, this /1p is 1,200 psi (8.27 MPa)
tive lift point is that depth to which the flowing BHP is and is approximately the same regardless of the pump
capable of supporting the fluids in the tubing string. The position, neglecting any effect of changes caused by
appropriate illultiphase flow correlation shows this to be multiphase flow calculations. Fig. 13 clarifies this with
7,500 ft (2.:86 m) from bottom or at a depth of 4,500 ft the pump set at different positions. Note that discharge
(1371.6 m) (Fig. 13). Theoretically, a pumping system pressure is the same if the pump is on the bottom or at
could be set at 4,500 ft (1371.6 m) and, by creating a 10,000 ft (3048 m), but less at 4,500 ft (1371.6 m)
zero intake pressure at this point, the objective flow rate because of free gas lightening the pressure traverse.
could be obtained. The discharge head above the pump However, the total fluid volume (oil plus free gas) is
then would consist of all head and pressure losses above much higher at 4,500 ft (1371.6 m).
OCTOBER 1982 2391
There are many reasons for setting a pump either periodically on a scheduled basis. The ability to replace
below or near the effective lift point. Obviously, the this pump with very little downtime makes it attractive
pump should be submerged enough to allow sufficiently for these conditions. Care should be exercised and deep
high entry pressure to prevent cavitation and to over- well installations should be limited to low PI and low
come any entry loss restrictions that might exist across a BHP.
downhole gas separator. Submergence in feet (meters) is
defined as the fluid level in the annulus above the pump Beam Pumping. Some beam pumping systems are
under operating conditions. The desirability of creating operating below 12,000 ft (3657.6 m); however, the ad-
low pump intake pressures may restrict some pumping ditional horsepower to lift the sucker rods may become
systems, and a general rule of thumb of 300-psi excessive, and work to lift the rods must occur from the
(2.07-MPa) pump intake pressure for oil wells pumping pump depth and not from the effective lift depth. Very
gas will restrict some pumps. The handling of free gas low flow rates are expected.
volumes through the pump makes the deeper setting The beam pump is the most widely used system for
A new innovation of the sucker rod pump (Fig. 14) has ". ., •• u . • • I,,)
been considered in a few areas offshore Africa. This <> • '.1 I·. ~.
U .'.~
system utilizes a winch-type principle, a means of pull- U " ...... ~: 0'
ing its own sucker rods, and occupies very little space.
Gas lift, electrical pumping, and hydraulic piston Fig. 14-Long stroke pumping unit.
pumping are the systems generally considered for off-
shore operations. The ability to retrieve gas lift valves
and hydraulic pumping units is a distinct advantage, with corrosion, emulsions, downhole temperature, and sur-
the hydraulic pump having the lowest upper volume face climate.
limitation. The use of power water eliminates the fire
hazard of the hydraulic system. The electrical pump cur- Sand. Production of sand causes erosion problems for all
rently is not considered developed sufficiently for types of artificial lift. Gas lift is the only method that
retrievable operations, although a few are installed. If does not require that the sand-laden fluid pass through
and when the retrievable problems are removed, the the lifting mechanism. Sand fillup on top of a bot-
electrical pump will be one of the most attractive lift tomhole pump may cause retrieval problems.
methods for offshore.
The location of the system in urban areas requires Paraffin. Accumulation of paraffin in the upper portions
proper environmental considerations. Sometimes the dis- of the tubing string, wellhead, or flowline will cause
tant location of the power system, such as a compressor backpressure that reduces efficiency. Removal or
for gas lift or surface facilities for a hydraulic pump, prevention is required. Sucker rod pumping has an ad-
becomes attractive. Special considerations also are need- vantage over other lift methods since the rods provide
ed for extremely cold and hot climates. continuous scraping action. Scrapers or guides may aid
paraffin removal. High-temperature fluids and inhibitors
Heavy Crude Oils. The lifting of more and more heavy can be circulated immediately in a hydraulic system.
crude oils is becoming necessary. Currently most are Plungers serve as automatic paraffin scrapers.
handled with the beam pump. The hydraulic pump offers
a ready means of mixing a light power oil with a heavy Scale. Deposition of scale will reduce the ID of tubing
producing crude to reduce the viscosity. The economics and therefore will decrease efficiency. Gas lift may ag-
and practicability of this solution are questionable. A gravate scale deposition. Prevention by chemical ad-
light crude must be available, and there is a reduction in ditives may provide longer pump life and may maintain
quality and price in the mixing. fullbore tubing. Plungers will keep the tubing clean.
Special types of lift have been devised to lift heavy
crudes, such as the Efflar unit. 2 The efficiency of the Corrosion. Downhole corrosion may be caused by elec-
electrical pump is reduced considerably and gas lift does trolysis between different metal types, H 2 S, or CO 2
not appear very attractive. The beam pump, therefore, is content in the produced fluid, highly saline or saturated
used more extensively than are other methods. brine water, or oxygenation of metals. H 2 S embrittle-
Lifting heavy crudes in fields by use of steam floods ment is a major problem and will accelerate sucker rod
requires special attention to very hot fluids. failure if the rods are excessively loaded. Gas lifting with
corrosive gas may prove uneconomical. However, cur-
Operating Problems. Operating problems are difficult rent thinking in the industry seems to indicate that in
for some lift methods and include sand, paraffin, scale, most cases gas lift with corrosive gas creates no
OCTOBER 1982 2393
TABLE 3-GIVEN DATA, EXAMPLE 1 ' Relative Economics. Six economic factors represent the
most important parameters in selection of artificial lift
Depth, ft (m) 8,000 (2438.4)
GOR, sct (std m 31m 3)
equipment: (1) initial capital investment, (2) monthly
400(71.3)
Water production, % 50 operating expense/income cost indicators, (3) equipment
Rate, BID (m 3 /d) 800 (127.19) life, (4) number of wells to be lifted, (5) surplus equip-
°API 42 ment availability, and (6) well life.
Tubing size, in. (cm) 00 2~8(7.31)
Each of the artificial lift systems has economic and
All power sources available
PR' psia(MPa) 2,300 (15.86)
operating limitations that eliminate it from consideration
PI until reaching P b = 1,600 psi (11.03 MPa) 3 under certain operating conditions.
P wh, psia (MPa) 100 (0.69) Economic and operating guidelines are fairly well
Casing size, in. (cm) 7(17.79) defined by experience, especially within a given set of
'Reprinted with permission from S. Gibbs, Nabla Corp., Midland, TX, with modifications
well-defined operating conditions. Space does not permit
by K. Brown. 1 a complete economic comparison in this paper.