The Impact of Training and Development On Employee Performance in Agriculture Sector
The Impact of Training and Development On Employee Performance in Agriculture Sector
net/publication/366739825
CITATIONS READS
0 192
4 authors, including:
Nurazwa Ahmad
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
40 PUBLICATIONS 87 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
A Model for Assessing Technological Capability Readiness for Sustainable Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in Malaysia View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Nurazwa Ahmad on 01 January 2023.
RMTB
Homepage: http://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/rmtb
e-ISSN : 2773-5044
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/rmtb.2022.03.02.011
Received 30 September 2022; Accepted 01 November 2022; Available online 01 December
2022
Abstract: Apart from capital, employees represent as one of the most valuable assets
of a company. The fates of company reputation depend on them. The performance of
an employee is affected by elements such as organizational policies, working
environment, training programs and development opportunities, and workforce
relations. Some public and private organizations either locally or globally lack the
initiative to acknowledge the significance of upgrading the employee productivity
through training. Some organizations even slash first their spending budget on
training when the going gets tough which result in increasing staff turnover, higher
cost to re-hire new staffs and would therefore finally detrimental to the firm’s
productivity and profitability. The purpose of this paper is to ascertain the level and
impact of employee performance towards training and development among workers
in agricultural sector. Employing the quantitative method, the result reveals a high
relationship level and a positive significant relationship between the variables. The
findings of this research are beneficial for organizations to map out appropriate
training and development programs for their employees.
1. Introduction
Malaysian agriculture products are largely export-oriented. Referring to Human Resource Fund
(2018), agricultural sector engaged in commodity agriculture plantation with mainly oil palms and
rubber and perennial agricultures that engage in food production such as vegetables, fruits, corns, paddy
and pineapples amongst others. Agricultural activities in Malaysia are affected by weather changes such
as monsoon season, dry spell, floods and other man-made disaster such as haze and pandemic which
are not within the farmers’ capacity to control. Other than that, government policies, technological and
technical advancements, environmental awareness, soil quality and climatic changes influence the
production capacity. Nowadays, technology plays an important role in increasing the production
capacity. The acquisition of the necessary technologies requires a capable workforce. Therefore,
training programs and development opportunities is needed to upgrade the workforce performance and
skills (Khan et al., 2017).
The performance of an employee is affected by elements such as organizational policies, working
environment, training programs and development opportunities, and workforce relations (Khan et al.,
2016). Training will cultivate the expertise while development program will upgrade the workforce
quality to be more knowledgeable, effective, professional and experienced (Khan et al., 2017). The
positive effect in work performance will ensure the target is met without jeopardizing the interests of
the employees and the organizations (Stephen et al., 2017).
Satisfied and convincingly motivated employees are loyal, diligent, and unwilling to quit (Said,
2015). They are involved and encouraged in the formation of outstanding services or quality product.
A previous study revealed that the benefit of investing in training was gained by both the employee and
the organization because it improved customers’ satisfaction, employee capabilities, behaviors, and the
performance (Kiyana & Bett, 2017). Investing on training and development will have the effect on
employee performance (Younas et al., 2018). However, some public and private organizations either
locally or globally lack the initiative to acknowledge the significance of upgrading the employee
productivity through training. During the economic downturn where the sales are going downhill, the
first thing that some organizations do is to slice the training budget (Abdullahi et al., 2018). This will
increase the staff turnover, incur higher cost to re-hire new staffs and would therefore finally jeopardize
the firm’s productivity and profitability.
This study intends to ascertain the level of training and development programs and employee
performance amongst agriculture employee, and to examine the impact of training and development on
employee performance in Kedah, Malaysia.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Agriculture Industry in Malaysia
Malaysia is serious in improving the agricultural sector with the introduction of 5-Year Malaysian
Plan series starting from Year 1966 where agriculture plays a major component in the plan. During the
8th Malaysian Plan (2001-2005) period, the agriculture sector’s performance was improving with
increasing production, higher value, and increasing commodity exports. Later, the 9th Malaysia Plan
(2006-2010) outlined this sector as the third income generator in the country (Shaffril et al., 2010).
As for Kedah, agriculture sector had increased from 0.1 percent in 2018 to 2.0 percent in 2019
(Laporan Sosioekonomi Negeri Kedah, 2019). According to the similar report, oil palm which is the
greatest contributor to agriculture grows 1.5 percent in 2019. The increasing harvest is mainly caused
by the acceptance of technical and cultural changes in the agricultural sector with new techniques and
133
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
farming concepts. The knowledge of these new techniques, ideas and method however must be
disseminated to the farmers by training and development programs.
2.2 Employee Performance
Performance refers to the evaluation of achievement of certain assignment within a specific
category, accuracy, accomplishment, expenditure and time lapse. Employee performance is a factor that
shape the success of an organization. Okechukwu (2017) stated that employee performance is the results
of an accomplished task performed according to the company’s target. Performance will be increased
when the employees are highly motivated and have the knowledge in how to increase productivity
through training on the use of new technologies. Human resource management approaches are greatly
and substantially related to the workforce performance and development (Afshan et al., 2012). Studying
the factors that stimulate employee performance have been the interest of many researchers. Research
was done in Indonesia to evaluate the effect of education and work training on the performance of
employees which found that education had a great influence on the performance of employees
(Alnawfleh, 2020). Employee performance could be evaluated annually or quarterly basis to appraise
the accomplished goals and to identify areas that need improvement (Khan et al., 2017). Employee
performance may also be upgraded by training the employee to instill team working capabilities.
Employee capabilities will be upgraded if an organization enhance its workers’ knowledge and abilities
through training which in turn will produce more productive workforce that will create a more effective
bonding between the organization and the employees (Hafeez & Akbar, 2015).
2.3 Training and Development (T&D)
Two aspects of training are teaching and learning (Khan et al., 2017). Training is the process of
delivering certain capabilities and conducted to increase employee’s flexibility and productivity. It
includes teaching, instructing, and educating employees to enable them becoming as skilled as possible
to complete their tasks and able to cope in more demanding and accountable positions (Habib et al.,
2015). Development is the learning opportunities and designed to support the progress of learning
capabilities. Training and development are structured learning proficiency that groom individuals for
their current and forthcoming undertakings.
Training and development focus on the advancement of technical and operational knowledge,
concept understanding, and methodical and practical implementation (Abogsesa & Kaushik, 2017). It
is a technique to improve employee performance and simultaneously suppress unwanted behaviors
(Okechukwu, 2017). Performance will be upgraded at both the organizational and individual stages.
Furthermore, it is an organization’s instrument to acquire necessary skills, attitude and know-how to
successfully accomplish the given tasks (Iyayi, 2007). Training is the fundamental technological traits
for an employee to operate equipment and provide services at the designated level of merit.
2.4 Training and Development with Employee Performance
To manage and empower people, training and development programs are very important to any
organization because effective training and development program benefits both the organization and
the employee. T&D program which comprises of technology-based learning, off-the-job training,
coaching and mentoring have significant effect on minimizing employee turnover, upgrading job
satisfaction and morale, upgrading employee’s performance and finally propelling a higher productivity
and financial gains (Stephen et al., 2017). Salah (2006) found a significant positive correlation between
the training and development with the performance and productivity. Other study also showed that
employee training and development possess a significant positive influence on their performance and
productivity (Habib et al., 2015). T&D also generate higher confidence level amongst the employees.
As such, most employees agree that training and development enhance their performance while the
organizations coincide that T&D have a beneficial and substantial effect on employee work
performance and productivity. Based on the above, the hypotheses are proposed as follows:
134
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
H1: There is a significant corelation between training and development and employee performance.
H2: There is a significant effect of training and development on employee performance.
2.6 Research Framework
This study is conducted to examine the effect of training and development on employee
performance. Framework in Figure 1 is adopted from Alnawfleh (2020), Franklin et al. (2014) and
Mdhlalose (2020).
Training Employee
&
Performance
Development
3. Research Methodology
3.1 Research Design
This study engages the quantitative research strategies to examine the effect of training and
development on employee performance in agriculture sector. Quantitative research comprises of a
thorough study in order to extract precise information to achieve the objectives of the research. To
generate measurable causes and effect relationship between the variables, quantitative research is an
important method (Creswell, 2013). To exercise this method, questionnaire was disseminated among
the farms’ owners and employees in Kedah. This study also employs descriptive research approach to
illustrate the issues related to the effect of training and development on employee performance in
agriculture sector.
3.2 Unit of Analysis
Bhattacherjee (2012) stated that the target of the study which comprises the elements of objects,
organizations, groups, countries, person, technologies or collective is the unit of analysis. It elaborates
on the characteristics of that elements and analyze the information that is extracted to form an evaluated
data of the subject. This study has chosen the workers and owners of the farms in an agricultural sector
as the target respondents and the unit of analysis in examining the correlation and effect of training and
development towards employee performance.
3.3 Population and Sampling
According to Bell, Bryman & Harley, (2019), population is the number of residents or people in a
certain perimeter or locality. This study focuses on the farms’ owner and employees as the population
sampling. There are about 4,042 hired employees working for Kedah’s agriculture sector (Felda’s
Annual Report, 2018). Using the table by Krejcie and Morgan’s (1970), the required sample for this
study is 351.
3.4 Research Instrument
Likert scales were engaged to measure the items in section A, B, and C of this study. The scale
ranged from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Respondents’ profiles and demographics of
four items in section D were gathered using a nominal scale. In training and development section, 6
items from Franklin et al. (2014) were implemented, while 2 items were adopted with 1 from Mdhlalose
(2020) and 1 from Alnawfleh (2020). Likewise, employee performance was also represented with 8
135
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
items in which 6 items from Franklin et al. (2014), while 2 items were adopted with 1 from Mdhlalose
(2020) and 1 from Alnawfleh (2020)
3.5 Data Collection
This study is conducted by approaching the employees or farm owners in the agriculture sector to
distribute the questionnaires. This method is very much uncomplicated because it is inexpensive, wider
coverage, straightforward implementation, and easy to understand. The estimated time taken to collect
the data was approximately 2 months; from 24 October 2021 to 24 December 2021. The questionnaire
was handed out physically and via online platforms. The primary data was the farms’ owners and its
employees while the secondary data is derived from available information recorded by other writers or
researchers for different purposes but relevant to the study such as articles, journals and theses by
scholars which can be obtained offline and online.
3.6 Data Analysis
The data from questionnaires yield descriptive statistics when evaluated by engaging Statistical
Package for Social Science (SPSS) to enable the generation of charts. The data will be interpreted and
from there recommendation will emerge and the items will be discussed to arrive at a conclusion (Said,
2015). The descriptive analysis used mean or average interpretation scale. The values of low (between
1.00 and 2.33), medium (between 2.34 and 3.67), and high (between 3.68 and 5.00) represented in the
mean scale. Cronbach’s alpha (α) is applied to ascertain the reliability analysis to validate the data used
in the study (Taber, 2018). According to (Zikmund 2000) if α close to 1, data is expected to be reliable
while if α is fewer than 0.5, the data is unreliable. Table 1 illustrates the interpretation of Cronbach’s
alpha coefficient.
Table 1: Cronbach’s alpha (α) coefficient
Cronbach’s alpha Interpretation Cronbach’s alpha Interpretation
(α) (α)
α > 0.9 Very good α > 0.6 Questioned
α > 0.8 Good α > 0.5 Weak
α > 0.7 Acceptable α < 0.5 Not acceptable
Before further analyses is carried out, normality test is conducted. It is a statistical process that
comprises of a diagnostic hypothesis test where a normally distributed data will undertake the Pearson
correlation test for parametric analysis. Instead, Spearman correlation test will be conducted for
abnormal condition. Kolmogorov-Smirnov or the Shapiro-Wilk test is engaged to resolve the data
normality distribution. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is recommended to ascertain if normal curve is
obtained (Aldrich & Cunningham, 2016). As stated by Rahim (2013) normally distributed data when
Sig (p-value) > 0.05. The term used for alliance between two variables is called correlation (Gogtay &
Thatte, 2017) and used to gauge the strength of a connection between two or more variables. It justifies
the impact of two or more variables causing similar influence, which means the existence of relationship
amongst them (Lani, 2010). Moreover, it is a method to ascertain the existence of relationship between
the independent and the other dependent variables (Gogtay & Thatte, 2017). The variable is significant
if the significance value is less than 0.005 and the variable is not significant if the value is greater than
0.005. The normality test using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk will indicate whether the data
has normal distribution. Since this study employs Kolmogorov-Smirnov test because this analysis was
conducted on 71 respondents which was more than 50 respondents. The analysis showed variables P
value was <0.005 i.e: 0.00 for training and development as well as for employee performance. This
indicated a not normally distributed data. As such, non-parametric Spearman’s Rho correlation test was
engaged to illustrate the correlation between two variables. Table 2 illustrates the correlation
coefficient’s strength.
136
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
The same approach is used for multiple regression. The squared variable (quadratic) component
might be applied as a forecaster in the existence of theoretical or statistical evidence which show that
there is one or another predictor variables possess curvilinear correlation towards the dependent
variable. The coefficients measure the intensity of variable changes that can be either negative or
positive (George & Mallery, 2019).
3.7 Pilot Study
The effectiveness of a questionnaire is tested on a trial run. This exercise is called a pilot study
(Doody & Doody, 2015) which is conducted before the main research to generate ideas, methods, and
indications that were unnoticed beforehand and eliminate misleading enquiries (Prescott et al., 1989).
For the purpose of this study, the suitability of questionnaires was assessed on 15 respondents. The
reliability test for the pilot study in training and development was α = 0.878 and employee performance
reliability test was α = 0.840 which showed a good Cronbach’s alpha value. This indicated the items
were suitable in measuring the variables and reliable to proceed further studies.
137
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
respondents with SPM/STPM. In work experience section, 30 (42.3%) respondents with less than 5
years’ work experience, 21 (29.6%) respondents with 6-10 years’ work experience, 9 (12.7%)
respondents with 11-15 years’ work experience, and 11 (15.5%) respondents with 16 years and above
of working experience. 39 (54.9%) respondents were working full time while 21 (29.6%) respondents
were working part time. 10 (14.1%) respondents were the farm owners. 67 (94.4%) of the respondents
are Malaysian citizen while 4 (5.6%) respondents are Thailand citizen. The respondents’ demographic
information is depicted in Table 4.
Table 4: Demographic information
Demographics Items Frequency (N=71) Percentage (%)
Gender Male 40 56.3
Female 31 43.7
Age (years) 20-25 23 32.4
26-30 3 4.3
31-35 13 18.3
36-40 14 19.7
41-45 4 5.6
46 years old and above 14 19.7
Ethnicity Malay 38 53.5
Chinese 2 2.9
Indian 14 19.7
Others 17 23.9
Education Level SPM/STPM 33 46.5
Diploma 13 18.3
Degree 20 28.2
Master 2 2.8
Other 3 4.2
Working Less than 5 30 42.2
Experience (years) 6-10 21 29.6
11-15 9 12.7
16 years and above 11 15.5
Employment Status Part time 21 29.6
Full time 39 54.9
Owner 10 14.1
Other 1 1.4
Citizenship Malaysian 67 94.4
Thailand 4 5.6
138
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
effective” (μ =3.97, σ = 0.970) respectively were revealing the two highest mean values. This study
however found out that although question 4 showed the lowest mean value, the level range was still
high. This condition led to a conclusion that respondents concurred the existence of a system where the
organizations were taking parts in spending for training because not only the employees but also the
companies benefitted from the program.
Table 5: Descriptive analysis for training and development (T&D)
139
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
In the Table 7 as shown above, the F statistic for the final model indicates a value of 222.084
comes with a significant value of 0.000. This indicates a significant model which confirms the existence
of the effect between training and development with R value of 0.873. It clarifies the 76.3% of the
variation within the dependent variable, employee performance (R2= 0.763) and 76.0% of the variation
of employee performance within real populations (Adjusted R2= 0.760). Therefore, H2: “there is a
significant impact of training and development on employee performance” was supported
140
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
performance amongst agriculture workers, particularly in Kedah. This study had also evaluated the
correlation between training and development towards employee performance, and the effect of training
and development towards employee performance. It was found that both elements of training and
development and employee performance indicated a high level of relationship and a convincing
correlation between training and development towards employee performance. Finally, in
understanding the policies of human resource management, any organization or the farm owners which
are the subject of this study could implement training and development programs to assist employees
at work to perform better, continuously motivated, and productive. This study is significant to create
awareness to organizations about the importance of suitable training and development programs to
improve their employees’ capabilities, talents, and skills in order to remain relevantly competitive and
prosperous.
Acknowledgement
The authors were very grateful and would also extend the appreciation to the Technology and
Innovation Management Focus Group and Faculty of Technology Management and Business,
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia for the support given.
References
Abdullahi, M. S., Gwadabe, Z. L. & Ibrahim, M. B. (2018). Effect of Training and Development on Employee’s
Productivity among Academic Staff of Kano State Polytechnic, Nigeria. 1(2), 264-286.
Abogsesa, A. S., & Kaushik, G. (2017). Impact of training and development on employee performance: A study
of Libyan Bank. International Journal of Civic Engagement and Social Change, 4(3), 53-68.
Afshan, S., Sobia, L., Kamran, A., Nasir, M. (2012). Impact of training on employee performance: a study of
telecommunication sector in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(6),
646-661.
Aldrich, J. O. & Cunningham, J. B. (2016). Using IBM SPSS Statistic: An interactive Hand-On-Approach. United
States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Alnawfleh, S. H. (2020). Effect of Training and Development on Employee Performance in the Aqaba Special
Economic Zone Authority. Journal of Business & Management, 8(1), 20.
https://doi.org/10.25255/jbm.2020.8.1.20.34
Anaeto F.C., Asiabaka C.C., Nnadi F.N, Ajaero J.O., Ugwoke F.O., Ukpongson M.U & Onweagba, A.E. (2012).
The role of extension officers and extension services in the development of agriculture in Nigeria.
Wudpecker, Journal of Agriculture Research, 1(6), 180-185.
Asfaw, A. M., Argaw, M. D., & Bayissa, L. (2015). The Impact of Training and Development on Employee
Performance and Effectiveness: A Case Study of District Five Administration Office, Bole Sub-City, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2015.34025
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research strategies. Business Research Methods, 17-37.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices.
Cole, G. A. (2002). Personnel and Human Resource Management. 5th Edition, York Publishers, Continuum
London.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage
publications.
Doody, O., & Doody, C. M. (2015). Conducting a pilot study: Case study of a novice researcher. British Journal
of Nursing, 24(21), 1074-1078.
Franklin, D. K., Cowden, R., & Karodia, A. M. (2014). The impact of training and Development on Job
Performance. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics, and Management Studies, 3(3), 1-34.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Gogtay, N. J., & Thatte, U. M. (2017). Principles of correlation analysis. Journal of Association of Physicians of
India, 65(3), 78-81.
Habib, S., Zahra, F., & Mushtaq, H. (2015). Impact of training and development on employees’ performance and
productivity: A case study of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(8), 326-330.
141
Anita et al., Research in Management of Technology and Business Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) p. 132-142
Hafeez, U., & Akbar, W. (2015). Impact of Training on Employees Performance (Evidence from Pharmaceutical
Companies in Karachi, Pakistan). Business Management and Strategy, 6(1), 49.
https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v6i1.7804
Human Resources Development Fund (2018). Agriculture Sector Overview: Will Agriculture Be the Next Sector
Covered Under PSBM Act? Retrieved from
https://hrdcorp.gov.my/wpcontent/uploads/2021/03/08issue_July02_2019-Human-Capital-Report-
Agriculture Sector-Overview.pdf
Iyayi, S. A. (2007). Training and Development of Human Resources in Bello-Imam, Il Bet al (eds), Fundamentals
of Human Resource Management in Nigeria. Ibadan: College Press and Publishers Ltd.
Karim. M, Choudhury. M, Latif. W. (2019). The Impact of Training and Development on Employees’
Performance: An Analysis of Quantitative Data. 3(2), 25-33.
Khan, U. R., Perveen, S., & Shujat, F. (2017). The Impact of Training and Development on Staff Productivity of
the Banking Sector Karachi Pakistan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research,
5(April), 393-402.
Khan, A. A., Abbasi, S. O. B. H., Waseem, R. M., Ayaz, M., & Ijaz, M. (2016). Impact of Training and
Development of Employees on Employee Performance through Job Satisfaction: A Study of Telecom Sector
of Pakistan. Business Management and Strategy, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v7i1.9024
Kiyana, L. C., & Bett, S. (2017). Training and Development Practices and Employee Performance of Turkana
County. International Journal of Current Aspects in Human Resource Management, 1(1), 153-165.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Lani, J. (2010). Conduct and interpret a bivariate (Pearson) correlation. Statistics Solutions, 1-2
Laporan Sosioekonomi Negeri Kedah, (2019).
https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/uploads/files/1_Articles_By_Themes/National%20Accounts/GDPbyState/20
20/Laporan_Sosioekonomi_Kedah_2019.pdf
Mdhlalose, D. (2020). An Evaluation of the Impact of Training and Development on Organisational Performance:
A Case Study of the Gauteng Provincial Department of Economic Development. Journal of Human Resource
and Sustainability Studies, 8(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2020.81004
Nzeru, W., Nzimakwe, I., Mutambara, E., & Munapo, E. (2015). Impact of Training and Development on
Employees’ Performance. The Indian Economic Journal, 63(3), 448-472.
Okechukwu, W. (2017). Influence of Training and Development, Employee Performance On Job Satisfaction
Among The Staff Of School Of Technology Management And Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Journal
of Technology Management and Business, 4(1).
Prescott, P. A., Soeken, K. L. & Ryan, J. W. (1989). Measuring Patient Intensity: A Reliability Study. 12(3), 225-
269.
Rahim, U. (2013), IBM SPSS statistics for window.
Said, C. M. (2015). An Assessment on the Impact of Training and Development on Employees’ Performance at
Work: A Case Study of NSSF Headquarters. Retrieved from http://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/11192/984
Salah, M. R. A. (2016). The Impact of Training and Development on Employees Performance and Productivity.
International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 5(7).
Shaffril, H. A. M., & Uli, J. (2010). The influence of socio-demographic factors on work performance among
employees of government agriculture agencies in Malaysia. Journal of International Social Research, 3(10).
Stephen, T., Sheng, W. C., Yong, L. D., Narh, O. C., & Sackitey, E. (2017). Research Article the Impact of
Training and Development on Employees’ Performance: A Case. International Journal of Information
Research and Review, 4(1), 3482-3487.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science
education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
Younas, W., Farooq, M., Khalil-Ur-Rehman, F., & Zreen, A. (2018). The impact of training and development on
employee performance. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(7), 20-23.
Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business Research Methods (6th edition). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons
142