Wholeissue 49 6
Wholeissue 49 6
June/juin 2023
Crux Mathematicorum is a problem-solving journal at the secondary and university undergraduate levels,
published online by the Canadian Mathematical Society. Its aim is primarily educational; it is not a research
journal. Online submission:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
Crux Mathematicorum est une publication de résolution de problèmes de niveau secondaire et de premier
cycle universitaire publiée par la Société mathématique du Canada. Principalement de nature éducative,
le Crux n’est pas une revue scientifique. Soumission en ligne:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
The Canadian Mathematical Society grants permission to individual readers of this publication to copy articles for
their own personal use.
c CANADIAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 2023. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ISSN 1496-4309 (Online)
La Société mathématique du Canada permet aux lecteurs de reproduire des articles de la présente publication à des
fins personnelles uniquement.
Editorial Board
Crux Mathematicorum
Founding Editors / Rédacteurs-fondateurs: Léopold Sauvé & Frederick G.B. Maskell
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: G.W. Sands, R.E. Woodrow, Bruce L.R. Shawyer,
Shawn Godin
Crux Mathematicorum
with Mathematical Mayhem
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: Bruce L.R. Shawyer, James E. Totten, Václav Linek,
Shawn Godin
MathemAttic /287
MATHEMATTIC
No. 46
The problems featured in this section are intended for students at the secondary school
level.
MA227. Find and prove the general formula for the square root of the
product of four consecutive integers plus 1.
MA228. Two circles with radii r1 and of r2 are a distance d apart from each
other. A point P is to be placed on the line connecting the centers of the two
circles so that the tangent lines to the circles go through the point forming angles
φ and ψ as shown below. How far from the center of the left circle should one
place the point P so that φ = ψ? Write your answer in terms of r1 , r2 , and d.
r2
r1
P
φ ψ
MA229. Determine the largest real number t such that the two polynomials
x4 + tx2 + 1 and x3 + tx + 1 have a common root.
.................................................................
Les problèmes proposés dans cette section sont appropriés aux étudiants de l’école sec-
ondaire.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 15 août 2023.
r2
r1
P
φ ψ
MA229. Déterminer le plus grand nombre réel t, tel que les deux polynômes
x4 + tx2 + 1 et x3 + tx + 1 ont une racine en commun.
MATHEMATTIC
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2023: 49(1), p. 5–6.
MA201. The figure below consists of 4 congruent squares. Find the angle θ.
Originally question 10 from the 34th University of Alabama High School Mathe-
matics Tournament: Team Competition, 2015.
We received 16 submissions of which 15 were correct and complete. We present
the solution by Brian Bradie.
Because the squares are congruent, the steeper line has a slope of 2, which implies
that the angle of inclination, θ1 , of the steeper line satisfies tan θ1 = 2. On the
other hand, the shallower line has a slope of 13 , so the angle of inclination, θ2 , of
the shallower line satisfies tan θ2 = 31 . Thus,
1 2 − 31 π
θ = θ1 − θ2 = tan−1 2 − tan−1 = tan−1 = tan−1 1 = .
3 1 + 2 · 13 4
MA202. Two players, A and B, play a game with a fair six-sided die. The
goal is to roll a 2 or a 5: whoever does so first wins the game. The players take
turns rolling the die, with player A going first. They keep rolling until someone
rolls a 2 or a 5. What is the probability that player A wins the game?
Originally question 3 from the 2009 Fifth Annual Kansas Collegiate Mathematics
Competition.
We received 8 solutions. We present the solution by Aravind Mahadevan, lightly
edited.
Let PA and PB denote the probabilities of A and B winning the game respectively.
If A misses getting a 2 or 5 on his first turn, then B has the same likelihood of
winning the game that A had at the beginning of the game. Therefore PB = 23 PA .
Since PA + PB = 1, we obtain
2 5
1 = PA + PA = PA .
3 3
a2 + b2 = c2 + d2 with a + b > c + d.
Show that
c4 + d4 > a4 + b4 .
√
where α + β = 28 + 12 5 and α ≥ 0 will lead (with more calculations) to the same
value of a + b. So, we have:
180
2
4 2 2 2
2 + b = 28 b − 28b + 180 = 0 (b − 18) · (b − 10) = 0
b √ √ √
⇐⇒ ⇐⇒
6 5 a = 6 5 a = 6 5
a =
b b
b
There are four solutions:
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
{( 10, 18); (− 10, − 18); ( 18, 10); (− 18, − 10)}
p √ √ √ √ √
Thus: 28 + 12 5 = | 10 + 18| = 10 + 18.
In the second square root the double product is negative. So, a and b have different
p √ √ √ √ √
signs: 28 − 12 5 = | 10 − 18| = 18 − 10.
We can repeat the same process for the third square root:
450
2
4 2
2 + b = 43 b − 43b + 450 = 0
® 2
a + b2 = 43
b √ √
√ ⇐⇒ ⇐⇒
2ab = −30 2 15 2 a = − 15 2
a = −
b
b
Again a and b are:
√ √ √ √ » √ √
{(5, −3 2); (−5, 3 2); (3 2, −5); (−3 2, 5)} =⇒ 43 − 30 2 = 5 − 3 2
Originally question 12 from the 35th University of Alabama High School Mathe-
matics Tournament: Team Competition, 2016.
We received 9 submissions, 8 of which were correct. We present the solution by
Ivan Hadinata.
X
A
P2
O2
P1 Q1
O1
Y Z
Notice the above picture. Let ∆XY Z be the given equilateral triangle. Let us
name Γ1 and Γ2 respectively the bigger and smaller circles as drawn in the figure.
Suppose that Γ1 , Γ2 are respectively centered at O1 , O2 and touching side XY
respectively at P1 and P2 . Γ1 touches XZ at Q1 . Also, let B be the region
constrained by segment XP1 , segment XQ1 , and minor arc P1 Q1 of Γ1 .
Observe that there exists a homothety H with center X and factor P2 O2
P1 O1 that sends
Γ1 to Γ2 , O1 to O2 , and B to A. Now we have XP1 = 1, and let P2 O2 = r. By
using trigonometric ratios, we get XO2 = 2r, P1 O1 = √13 , and XO1 = √23 . We
√
3 3−π
have that the area of B is 9 ; and
2 1 1
√ = XO2 + O1 O2 = 3r + √ =⇒ r = √ .
3 3 3 3
Ä ä2
P 2 O2
Thus, the area of A equals P 1 O1
times the area of B, that is
ã2 √ 1
√
!2 √ √
3 3−π 3 3−π 3 3−π
Å
P2 O2 3 3
· = · = .
P1 O1 9 √1 9 81
3
1/3
Editor’s Comments. The scaling factor is immediate if you use XP XP1 = 1 . The
2
area of B was √calculated by taking one third of the difference between the large
triangle (area 3) and its incircle (area π/3).
TEACHING PROBLEMS
No. 22
John Grant McLoughlin
Promoting Geometric Probability as a Method of
Solution
Last week in a school I found myself with two middle school students who wanted
a mathematical challenge. The following instruction was given to them. “Write
down a number between 0 and 10. The number does not have to be an integer.”
The question then posed was What is the probability that these two numbers will
be within 2 of each other?
This was the starting point for a discussion. We first made some predictions. Then
Susan (the teacher) and I also wrote down numbers. This gave us six different
possible pairings to consider with respect to how many would meet the requirement
of not differing by more than two.
The idea of drawing a picture to represent the problem was then suggested by
me. The intention here was to introduce geometric probability. That is, the
probability could be found by visually representing all possibilities and determining
the fraction of that area which would meet the requirements. My suggestion was
to make a grid of some sort and then figure a way of working out the probability.
Time was given to figure a plan. One of the students noted that the area is going
to be found by using lines related to differences of 2. This person suggested a grid
with spacing by 2, as shown below. That is, the axes would go from 0 to 10 with
intervals of 2. Further it was observed that the values differing by at most 2 would
be represented by the shaded region. The axes were labelled with the names of
the two students. Hence, it can be seen that if Edward selected 2, the number
Chris selected could be as small as 0 or as large as 4.
10
6
Chris
2 4 6 8 10
Edward
What would be the desired probability? Initially the number of squares was
counted as 9 including the five full squares and four pairs of half-squares. Care
then had to be taken to recognize that only 25 squares were in the grid rather
9
than the 100 as may be suggested by 10 × 10. The desired probability was 25 or
0.36. We considered this answer and revisited the predictions. A difference of 2
may suggest that there is a window of 4 for any guess as being 2 above or below
would satisfy the requirement. However, numbers less than 2 or greater than 8
would not give such wide windows as the boundaries of 0 and 10 would limit the
acceptable ranges. So an answer a bit less than 4 out of 10 or 0.40 would seem
reasonable.
Alternative approach
A reasoned approach without a picture could be employed here. When a number
6
is initially selected it would be expected to be between 2 and 8 in 10 of the cases.
4
Such selections would offer the full range of 4 or a 10 chance of selecting the second
4
number that differs by at most 2. In the remaining 10 of the cases, there will be a
restricted range of sorts to consider. For example, if a number is selected between
0 and 2 it will be limited in the lower direction by the 0. Likewise the numbers
from 8 through 10 will be restricted on the high side. That is, 4 out of 10 numbers
will be limited on average to 1 rather than 2 in one direction, thus, making for
3
only a 10 chance of getting a second number within 2.
The desired probability becomes
6 4 4 3 36
× + × = .
10 10 10 10 100
Personally, as one who is comfortable with such explanations this is fine. However,
as a teacher it has become clear to me that the visual representation of the prob-
ability has made much more sense to students generally. Geometric probability
was not part of my school math experience. Rather it was first encountered by
me in the 1980’s through a piece that appeared in an NCTM publication entitled
Mathematical Challenges II Plus Six. The problem discussed by Philip Smith is
shared here.
Two witches enjoy meeting each other over a cauldron of tea. Both
witches have serious shortcomings, however. First, each witch is poorly
organized and arrives at the meeting place randomly between midnight
and 1:00 a.m. Second, each is notoriously evil-tempered and becomes
outraged on having to wait 15 minutes or longer for her companion.
Thus, the following temper-saving arrangement has been agreed on:
when either witch has waited fifteen minutes - or when one o’clock
arrives and she is still alone - she disappears at once, not returning
until the next night. Here is our problem: On a given night, what is
the probability that the two witches meet?
It is the so called “witches problem” that has been adapted by me as a teaching
problem using two people arriving at a coffee shop with similar time constraints
ple is illustrated with an example of fearing an accident while standing under the
CN Tower. This could be a great way to teach students about risk assessment and
the role of probability in decision-making.
Another interesting case study in the book is the discussion on the correlation
and causation. Rosenthal uses the example of a study that found that medical-
school class presidents lived an average of 2.4 years less than other medical school
graduates. He explains that just because being class president is correlated with
shorter life expectancy does not mean that it causes shorter life expectancy. This
could be a great way to teach students about the difference between correlation
and causation, a concept that is often misunderstood.
In the chapter “What Are The Odds Of That?”, Rosenthal discusses the concept
of games of chance. He suggests that to win, one needs three ingredients: a well-
studied strategy that wins on average, repetition of the strategy, and patience
for the Law of Large Numbers to eventually lead to victory. This concept can
be applied in the classroom to teach students about strategic thinking and the
importance of patience and consistency in achieving long-term goals.
One of the most intriguing examples Rosenthal provides involves the game of poker.
He explains the concept of “drawing to an Inside Straight” versus “drawing to an
Outside Straight”. If you’re dealt a 5, 6, 8, and 9, you’re drawing to an Inside
Straight, and your chances of getting a 7 to complete the straight are quite small.
However, if you’re dealt a 5, 6, 7, and 8, you’re drawing to an Outside Straight,
and your chances of getting a 4 or 9 to complete the straight are twice as good.
This example can be used to teach students about conditional probability and the
importance of strategic thinking in games of chance.
Rosenthal also discusses the game of five-card stud poker. If you have three Queens
in your first four cards, and your opponent has two 5’s and one 4 showing, plus
one secret face-down card, you might assume that your three Queens beat three
5’s. However, your opponent’s heavy betting might suggest that their face-down
card could be another 5. This scenario can be used to teach students about the
concept of uncertainty and the role of probability in decision-making.
Rosenthal also explains why casinos always win. The secret lies in the Law of
Large Numbers. Even if a player has a strategy that wins on average, the casino
relies on players playing repeatedly. Over time, the Law of Large Numbers ensures
that the casino, which always has a slight edge, will come out on top. This can be
a valuable lesson for students in understanding how seemingly fair games can be
subtly biased and the long-term effects of probability.
Rosenthal also discusses the concept of true randomness, explaining how tradi-
tional science believed that randomness is caused purely by ignorance. He uses
the example of predicting the movement of a baseball or a planet, explaining how
physics can predict these movements precisely. This could be a great way to
introduce students to the concept of randomness and its role in science.
The book also digs into the famous “birthday problem”. The birthday problem is
a well-known probability puzzle that goes like this: In a group of just 23 people,
there’s a 50% chance that at least two people have the same birthday. Despite
there being 365 days in a year, it only takes a group of 23 for there to be a 50-50
chance of a shared birthday, and a group of 70 for there to be a 99.9% chance.
This counter-intuitive problem can be a great way to spark students’ interest in
probability.
“Struck by Lightning: The Curious World of Probabilities” by Jeffrey S. Rosenthal
is a treasure trove of real-world examples and engaging stories that make the
abstract concept of probability accessible and interesting. It’s a great resource for
secondary school teachers and students alike, providing numerous opportunities
for classroom discussions and activities.
.................................................................
MATHEMAGICAL PUZZLES
No. 5
Tyler Somer
Molten Gold - V
This is the concluding article in this series. We started the series by looking
at seemingly-impossible packing puzzles. Many of the puzzles include pieces that
have measurements which can be related to the numbers in the Fibonacci Sequence.
Readers unfamiliar with the Fibonacci Sequence and its association to the Golden
Ratio have a wonderful journey of mathematical discovery ahead of them.
More recently, we have looked at tray-packing puzzles in which a tile seemingly
melts into the tray, but only after the pieces are rearranged. For rectangular
rearrangements, the pieces are turned 90◦ , thus changing their horizontal and
vertical components. Equivalently, turning over rectangular pieces by reflecting
them through a 45◦ axis creates the same swap of their components. When Bill
Cutler created the non-rectangular parallelogram Pentominoes-MB puzzle (see the
previous article in this series [2023: 49(4), 192-194]), he gave the hint to turn the
pieces over. Notice that to fill a non-rectangular parallelogram, the acute angles
of the pieces must be oriented the same way. When these pieces are flipped, and
the acute angles are properly realigned, the lateral components – we cannot call
them horizontal and vertical components – are similarly swapped.
Modern puzzle designers continue to seek out innovative ways of hiding the trick
of such melting-tile puzzles in two dimensions and, analogously, melting-block
puzzles in three dimensions. In fact, Bill Cutler states that the “MB” suffix of
his Pentominoes-MB puzzle is a direct reference to the “Melting Block” puzzle,
first created by Thomas H. O’Beirne of Scotland. This class of puzzle apparently
originated with O’Beirne’s Melting Block. Let us take a closer look at the original.
Thomas H. O’Beirne was a professor of Computer Studies at the University of
Glasgow. He wrote an ongoing column, Puzzles and Paradoxes, as a long-time
contributor to the British magazine The New Scientist. Many of these columns
were compiled in book form in 1965, with the unsurprising title: Puzzles and Para-
doxes (New York, Oxford University Press). According to personal correspondence
with Bill Cutler, the original Melting Block puzzle was designed by O’Beirne in
the 1970s. There seems to be, however, very little literature about the puzzle. I
am once again thankful to Bill Cutler for providing information on the original
Melting Block puzzle, which I can happily share with readers here:
The Melting Block uses pieces which are based on a rectangular solid “brick” of
dimensions 19 × 29 × 44. When 27 of these bricks are stacked in a 3 × 3 × 3
arrangement, with all the bricks oriented the same way, the result is a rectangular
solid of size 57 × 87 × 132. However, if you take 28 of these same bricks and stack
them in a 2×2×7 arrangement, with the smallest dimension being stacked 7 wide,
7a = 3c + 1;
2b = 3a + 1;
2c = 3b + 1.
The reader can either solve the system as an exercise, or simply verify the above
report.
Taking note of Figure 2, pairs of adjacent pieces can be swapped in a single layer.
Alternatively, an entire layer can be rotated and/or reflected. By various com-
binations of these swaps, rotations, and reflections in the piece layers, some 93
“basic” solutions to the 3 × 3 × 3 box packing are possible. The entire box packing
can be subsequently rotated and reflected 8-fold, resulting in 744 apparent packing
solutions. With a ninth piece added – necessarily a copy of the unit brick – the
2 × 2 × 7 packing becomes the problem to solve. Cutler reassures us, dear reader,
that this second packing is a little more interesting and challenging to solve. In-
deed, there is but one fundamental solution to the 2 × 2 × 7 packing. It is left to
the reader to determine why there are 48 apparent packing solutions to this final
challenge.
For the woodworkers among the readership, there are many construction options.
One is to make 28 copies of the unit brick and create the larger pieces by gluing up
the bits appropriately. Another is to make each piece from a single slab of wood,
with no gluing. A single type of wood could be used for all the pieces, or up to nine
species of wood can create an exotic look, with or without gluing. Taken to the
extreme, gluing bricks made of 28 distinct wood species would create a countless
variety of exotic combinations. A Red Stone version of the puzzle exists with the
ninth piece painted red, and the other eight pieces a single species of wood. A
suitable basic measurement must be chosen, perhaps 1 millimetre or some fraction
of an inch, depending on the tools and equipment in your shop. A caliper is a
necessity. And, of course, the box itself must be sized accordingly, to give enough
play without being sloppy.
For the designers, there are four optional pieces that can be considered, each with
3a = 57 as the measure in that one dimension. Note that the puzzle’s design does
limit both 2b = 58 and 2c = 88 as the maximum measures in those respective
dimensions. As a practical matter, though, the pieces that are 57 × 58 × 44 and
57 × 58 × 88 should be removed from consideration. The almost-square profile of
either piece can be problematic: even if the piece(s) and the box are very precise,
the solver might not notice that such an almost-square piece could be in the wrong
orientation. Removing these two pieces leaves us with only ten useful pieces in this
universe of possibilities. The question arises: must there always be some piece –
any piece, not just the unit brick – that would be repeated in the puzzle? Or, is it
possible to have some set of unique non-unit pieces fill the 3 × 3 × 3 arrangement,
then have the addition of a single unit brick satisfy the 2 × 2 × 7 arrangement?
7a + 1 = 4c;
3b + 1 = 4a;
3c + 1 = 4b.
Solving, we get a = 37, b = 49, c = 65; this gives the measurements of the unit
brick. The box must accommodate the 4×4×4 arrangement as size 148×196×260,
as well as the smaller 147 × 195 × 259 size of the 3 × 3 × 7 arrangement.
To create possible puzzle pieces, Cutler and Rausch discounted zig-zag and L-
shaped pieces, leaving only rectangular blocks. The limits on the measurements
are from a to 4a, b to 3b, and c to 3c in these respective dimensions. The numerical
values of these limits are, thus, one of {37, 74, 111, 148} by one of {49, 98, 147} by
one of {65, 130, 195}. This provides 36 possible blocks to consider. For those who
might consider duplicating the work of Cutler and Rausch, here are some computer
time requirements to expect:
For the 3 × 3 × 7 box, allowing the unit brick as a piece:
• 2.5 hours of run-time.
• Over 110 million basic solutions; this excludes rotations and reflections.
• Over 435 thousand piece combinations supplied the 110 million solutions.
• Just under 15 thousand piece combinations provide a unique solution.
For the 4 × 4 × 4 box, allowing a second copy of the unit brick:
• 12 hours of run-time.
• Over 385 million basic solutions.
• Over 987 thousand piece combinations supplied the 385 million solutions.
• Just under 59 thousand piece combinations provide a unique solution.
polished blocks are stunning, with the appearance of a gold bar among silver bars.
This is several steps beyond the painted, yet more affordable, Red Stone version
available from a number of woodworkers.
.................................................................
OLYMPIAD CORNER
No. 414
The problems in this section appeared in a regional or national mathematical Olympiad.
OC636. Determine all the pairs (p, n) of a prime number p and a positive
p
integer n for which npn +1
+1
is an integer.
Consider the sequence (xn )n∈N defined by x1 = 1, xn+1 = f (xn ). Show that
the integer 2018 appears in this sequence, determine the last integer n such that
xn = 2018, and determine whether n with the property xn = 2018 is unique.
where [x] denotes the integer part of x and {x} = x − [x]. For example [2.5] = 2,
{2.5} = 0.5 and [−1.7] = −2, {−1.7} = 0.3.
OC639. For the curve sin(x) + sin(y) = 1 lying in the first quadrant, find the
constant α such that
d2 y
lim xα 2 .
x→0 dx
exists and is nonzero.
Les problèmes présentés dans cette section ont déjà été présentés dans le cadre d’une
olympiade mathématique régionale ou nationale.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 15 août 2023.
OC636. Déterminer toutes les paires (p, n) telles que p est un nombre premier,
p
+1
n est un entier positif, et npn +1 est entier.
Soit alors la suite (xn )n∈N définie par x1 = 1, xn+1 = f (xn ). Démontrer que
l’entier 2018 fait partie de cette suite, déterminer le plus grand entier n tel que
xn = 2018, puis déterminer si n tel que xn = 2018 est unique ou non.
OC638. Soit [x] la partie entière de x et {x} = x − [x]; par exemple, [2.5] = 2,
{2.5} = 0.5 et [−1.7] = −2, {−1.7} = 0.3. Déterminer tous les nombres réels x
tels que
1 1 1
+ = {x} + .
[x] [2x] 3
d2 y
lim xα
x→0 dx2
existe et est non nulle.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2023: 49(1), p. 26–27.
is irrational.
Let S be the set of positive integers that can be written as a sum of one or more
factorials of distinct positive integers, that is
S = {1!, 2!, 1! + 2!, 3!, 1! + 3!, 2! + 3!, 1! + 2! + 3!, 4!, 1! + 4!, 2! + 4!, 1! + 2! + 4!, . . .}.
For every positive integer n, we have
n
X
k! ≤ n · n! < (n + 1)!.
k=1
Hence, the sum representations of the members of S are unique up to the order
of terms. Therefore, the digits in base-b notation B = (1.d1 d2 d3 d4 . . . ) of p are
either 0 or 1 or 2. Furthermore, the digit dn at position of b−n is 1 if and only if
n ∈ N \ S.
Since the expansion B contains infinitely many occurrences of the digit 2, it is
infinite. For every positive number n, the consecutive integers
n
X
1+ k!, . . . , (n + 1)! − 1
k=1
are not elements of S. Thus, B contains arbitrarily long (finite) segments that
consist of consecutive digits 1. Consequently, the infinite representation B is not
periodic. This shows that p is irrational.
For the triangle CDE and the transversal M G it holds by Menelaus’s theorem,
C P D QE
with unsigned distances, that FF D · P E · QC = 1. Hence,
A variation of the Power Theorem of Casey states that the circle through C, D,
and E is tangent to the circle Ω if and only if dtD ± etE ± ctC = 0 Hence the result.
The variation of the Power Theorem of Casey is discussed together with a proof in
Johnson, Roger A. Advanced Euclidean Geometry, Dover Publications, Inc., 1960,
pp. 89-90, Theorem 117.
OC614. In a circus, there are n clowns who dress and paint themselves up
using a selection of 12 distinct colours. Each clown is required to use at least
five different colours. One day, the ringmaster of the circus orders that no two
clowns have exactly the same set of colours and no more than 20 clowns may use
any one particular colour. Find the largest number n of clowns so as to make the
ringmaster’s order possible.
Originally Problem 5 from the 2006 Asian Pacific Mathematics Olympiad.
We received 5 submissions, all of which were correct and complete. We present
the solution by Theo Koupelis.
The maximum number of times a distinct colour is used is 12 × 20, which must
be greater than the minimum number of colours used, which is 5 × n. Therefore,
n ≤ 48. It is possible to construct 48 distinct sets, each with 5 colours. For
example, if we number the colours as 1, 2, 3, . . . , 12, each of the 8 sets
{9, 10, 11, 12, 1, 2}, {11, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8}, {3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10}
has 6 distinct subsets, each subset consisting of 5 colours; all 48 subsets are clearly
distinct. Therefore, nmax = 48.
Using the given equalities and the power of point with respect to the circle we
have
(AX)(AW ) = (AY )(AZ) = (BZ)(BY ) = (BU )(BV ) = (CV )(CU ) = (CW )(CX).
Thus
(AX)2 + (AX)(XW ) = (CW )2 + (CW )(XW ),
which implies (AX − CW )(AX + CW + XW ) = 0 and AX = CW .
1 Introduction
In the first part of this two-part note we introduced the so-called combinatorial
lines.
For reader’s convenience here are definitions of terms used in the definition of a
combinatorial line. In the rest of this note, for a natural number n we will denote
the set {1, 2, . . . , n} by [1, n].
In this note our goal is to motivate and state the claim of the Hales-Jewett theorem
and to demonstrate a few of its applications.
Example 1. For a, b ∈ [1, 4], consider the root τ = ∗ a b ∈ [1, 4]3∗ and the
Euclidean line `τ in R3 given by its parametric equations x = t, y = a, z = b,
t ∈ R. Hence, `τ is the line that passes through the point (0, a, b) and is parallel to
the x-axis. Now, the combinatorial line Lτ = {1 a b, 2 a b, 3 a b, 4 a b} corresponds
to the winning position
{(1, a, b), (2, a, b), (3, a, b), (4, a, b)} = {(t, a, b) : t ∈ [1, 4]} ⊆ `τ ∩ Q(4, 3).
x1 = b1 + α1 · t, x2 = b2 + α2 · t, . . . , xn = bn + αn · t, t ∈ R,
Lτ `τ
(m) (m) (m) (m)
τm = x1 ··· xn (x1 , . . . , xn )
Define a k-colouring C of the cube [1, m]n as following: for a1 · · · an ∈ [1, m]n ,
C(a1 · · · an ) = i if and only if (a1 , . . . , ak ) ∈ Pi . By Proposition 1 and our as-
sumption that the game ended up in a tie, it follows that the colouring C of the
n-dimensional cube on alphabet [1, m] does not contain a monochromatic combi-
natorial line.
In the spirit of Ramsey theory, this observation leads us to the following question.
♣ ♥ ♠ ... ♥
♣ ♣ ♠ ... ♥
♣ ♠ ♠ ♥
♣ ♦ ♠ ... ♥
{♥, ♣, ♠, ♦}n is k–coloured. . . . . . and a red combinatorial line.
A nice answer to Question 1 would be that, for any k, m ∈ N and for a big
enough natural number n, the k-person n dimensional Tic-Tac-Toe m-in a row
game cannot end up in a tie.
This is exactly what Hales and Jewett discussed in their paper Regularity and posi-
tion games, published in 1963 [6]. Their famous Hales-Jewett theorem establishes
that, if the dimension is sufficiently large, a generalized Tic-Tac-Toe game never
ends up in a tie.
Exercise 1. Let A = {a, b, c, d}. Can you find a 2-colouring of A2 that does not
contain a monochromatic combinatorial line? If yes, does this contradict the claim
of the Hales-Jewett theorem?
(1, 1, 3)
(3, 3, 2)
(3, 3, 1)
(3, 2, 1)
(1, 1, 1) (2, 1, 1) (3, 1, 1)
Example 2. Use the Hales-Jewett theorem to prove van der Waerden’s theorem:
If k, l ∈ N then any l-colouring of N contains a k-term monochromatic arithmetic
progression.
Solution. Let k, l ∈ N be given. Let c : N → [1, l] be an l-colouring of the set of
natural numbers. Let N = HJ(l; k). We define an l-colouring of the N -cube [1, k]N
as follows: if x1 x2 · · · xN ∈ [1, k]N then c0 (x1 x2 · · · xN ) = c(x1 + x2 + · · · + xN ).
By the Hales-Jewett theorem there is a c0 -monochromatic combinatorial line Lτ
rooted in a root τ = a1 a2 · · · aN ∈ [1, k]N
∗ . We observe that there is at least one
i ∈ [1, N ] such that ai = ∗.
Let S be the set of all i ∈ [1, N ] such that ai ∈ [1, k], i.e., the symbol ai 6= ∗.
Recall that the combinatorial line Lτ is the set of words of the form, for j ∈ [1, k],
(j) (j) (j) (j) (j)
τj = a1 a2 · · · aN , with ai = ai if i ∈ S and ai = j if i 6∈ S.
Let a = i∈S ai and let d = |[1, N ]\S|, i.e., let d ≥ 1 be the number of times that
P
the symbol ∗ appears in the root τ . Note that, for j ∈ [1, k],
N
(j) (j) (j)
X X X
ai = ai + ai = a + dj.
i=1 i∈S i∈[1,N ]\S
On the other hand,Äc0 (τ1 ) = cä0 (τ2 ) = · · · = c0 (τk ) which together with, for each
PN (j)
j ∈ [1, k], c0 (τj ) = c i=1 ai = c(a + jd), implies
Exercise 4. Use the Hales-Jewett theorem to prove that for any 2-colouring of
natural numbers there is an `-term arithmetic progression a1 , a2 , . . . , a` , not neces-
sarily monochromatic, such that the set A = {2a1 , 2a2 , . . . , 2a` } is monochromatic.
xk = x • (x • (x • (. . . (x • x) . . .)) = x
| • x •{z
. . . x • x} .
| {z }
k k
Note: Only in 2014, Neil Hindman and Eric Tressler established that HJ(2; 3) = 4
and obtained, what they called, “the first non-trivial Hales-Jewett number” [7].
Exercise 4. Let N = HJ(2; `) and let c be a 2-colouring of the set of nat-
ural numbers. We define a 2-colouring of the N -cube [1, `]N as follows: for
x1 x2 · · · xN ∈ [1, `]N , c0 (x1 x2 · · · xN ) = c (2x1 · 2x2 · . . . · 2xN ). By the
Hales-Jewett theorem, there is a c0 -monochromatic line Lτ , determined by a root
τ = a1 a2 · · · aN ∈ [1, `]N
∗ . Let S = {i ∈ [1, N ] : ai ∈ [1, `]}. Let a = i∈S ai and
P
let d = |[1, N ]\S|.
(j) (j) (j)
Recall that Lτ = {τ1 , τ2 , . . . , τ` } ⊆ [1, `]N , where, for j ∈ [1, `], τj = a1 a2 · · · aN ,
(j) (j)
with ai = ai , if i ∈ S, and ai = j, if i 6∈ S.
Note that, for any j ∈ [1, `],
N
(j) (j) (j)
X X X X
ai = ai + ai =a+ j = a + jd.
i=1 i∈S i∈[1,N ]\S i∈[1,N ]\S
On
Pthe other hand, c0 (τ1 ) = c0 (τ2 ) = · · · = c0 (τ` ), which together with c0 (τj ) =
N (j)
c 2 i=1 ai = c 2a+jd , for each j ∈ [1, `], implies that the `-term arithmetic
On the other handc0P (τ1 ) = c0 (τ2 ) = · · · = c0 (τ` ) which implies that, for each
N
0 τ (i)
= c xm+jd .
j ∈ [1, `], c (τj ) = c x i=1 j
Observe that, since binary operation • is associative, it follows, for each j ∈ [1, `],
xm+jd = | • .{z
|x • x •{z. . . • x} = (x . . • x}) • (x
| • .{z
. . • x})
m+jd m+d (j−1)d
j−1
= | • .{z
(x . . • x}) • ((x
| • .{z
. . • x}) • . . . • (x . . • x})) = xm+d · xd
| • .{z .
m+d d d
| {z }
j−1
References
[1] J. Andrews, A. Blondal, T. Trinh, and H. Zhang. Quad-Tac-Toe game. In
V. Jungić, editor, Introduction to Ramsey Theory: Students’ Projects. Simon
Fraser University, 2022.
[2] H. Furstenberg and Y. Katznelson. A density version of the Hales-Jewett the-
orem. Annals of Mathematics, 57: 64-119, 1991.
[3] R. L. Graham, B. Rothschild, and J. H. Spencer. Ramsey Theory. John Wiley
and Sons, New York, 2nd edition, 1990.
[4] R.L. Graham. Recent developments in Ramsey theory. In Z. Cisielski and C.
Olech, editors, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians,
Warsaw, 1983(2): 1555-1569, Amsterdam, 1984. North Holland.
[5] W.T. Gowers. Is massively collaborative mathematics possible? Gowers’s We-
blog, January 2009.
[6] A.W. Hales and R.I. Jewett. Regularity and positional games. Transactions of
the American Mathematical Society, 106(2): 222-229, 1963.
[7] N. Hindman and E. Tressler. The first nontrivial Hales-Jewett number is four.
Ars Combinatoria, 113: 385-390, 2014.
[8] O. Patashnik. 4 × 4 × 4 Tic-Tac-Toe. Mathematics Magazine, 53(4): 202-216,
1980.
[9] D.H.J. Polymath. A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem. Annals of
Mathematics, 175: 1283-1327, 2012.
PROBLEMS
Click here to submit problems proposals as well as solutions, comments
and generalizations to any problem in this section.
2R · M N + OM · CN + ON · BM = M C · ON + BN · OM.
In triangle ABC, the bisectors of angles A, B and C meet the sides BC, CA and
AB at D, E and F respectively. If ∠ADC = x, ∠AEB = y and ∠BF C = z,
prove that a sin 2x + b sin 2y + c sin 2z = 0 where a, b and c are the lengths of BC,
CA and AB respectively.
Two congruent ellipses Γ1 and Γ2 with semi-major axis a and semi-minor axis b
are given. The major axis of Γ1 and the minor axis of Γ2 lie on the same line, and
two common internal tangents of Γ1 and Γ2 are perpendicular. Find the area of
the triangle formed by two common internal tangents and one common external
tangent.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 15 août 2023.
2R · M N + OM · CN + ON · BM = M C · ON + BN · OM.
Dans le triangle ABC, les bissectrices des angles A, B et C rencontrent les côtés
BC, CA et AB en D, E et F respectivement. Si ∠ADC = x, ∠AEB = y
et ∠BF C = z, montrez que a sin 2x + b sin 2y + c sin 2z = 0, où a, b et c sont
respectivement les longueurs de BC, CA et AB.
4859. Proposée par Trinh Quoc Khanh, modifié par le comité de rédaction.
Pour un triangle donné ABC, soient X un point situé sur le segment AB et Y un
point situé sur le segment AC, de façon à ce que B, X, Y et C soient cocycliques;
les centres des cercles inscrits des triangles ABC, XBC et Y BC sont alors dénotés
I, J et K, respectivement. Démontrer que AI est orthogonal à JK.
SOLUTIONS
No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consider for
publication new solutions or new insights on past problems.
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2023: 49(1), p. 44–47.
1
Å ã
f x+ = yf (xy + y)
y
2f (1)
f (t) = .
t+1
Now for any r > o, letting x = r/2, y = 2/r we have xy + y = 1 + y > 1 and so
It follows that there is a constant k = 2f (1) such that f (x) = k/(x + 1) for every
x > 0.
It is easy to check that every such function satisfies the functional equation.
1
Å ã
P (x, y) : f x+ = yf (xy + y), ∀x, y > 0.
y
We have
1 x+2
Å ã Å ã
x x
P , : f · f (1),
=
x x+1 x x+1
x 2 2 x+2
Å ã Å ã
P , : f (x) = · f .
2 x x x
We need to guarantee that a0i are all the same, that is, a0i = a0i+1 for each 1 ≤ i ≤
2n − 1. Given that a0i = a0i+1 , we need
i
X i+1
X
ai + xj = ai+1 + xj
j=i−n+1 j=i−n+2
equivalently,
ai + xi−n+1 = ai+1 + xi+1 . (1)
(2) Next we show that 2n − 2 days are not enough using linear algebra. For the
sake of contradiction, suppose otherwise that 2n − 1 days work.
Consider the vector space V = Q2n . Let 1 be the all-one vector in V . For each
subset A ⊂ {1, 2, . . . , 2n}, let 1A be the indicator vector of A.
Let
that is, the collection of vectors representing the number of sweets the children
have at the start. Note that U ∪ {1} spans V . Indeed, if v = (v1 , . . . , v2n ) ∈ V ,
then there is a sufficiently large λ ∈ Q such that v + λ · 1 consists of positive
entries, and there is a sufficiently large integer M such that M (v + λ · 1) ∈ U .
Let u ∈ U . By the assumption, there are integers c1 , c2 , . . . , c2n−2 and n-subsets
A1 , A2 , . . . , A2n−2 of {1, 2, . . . , 2n}, such that if ci sweets are given to children with
label in Ai on the i-th day, then eventually all children obtain the same number
of sweets. Alternatively, this means that
that is, Q2n can be covered by finitely many subspaces with dimension at most
2n − 1, which is absurd.
Editor’s Comment. We refer to this Math Stackexchange post for a relevant dis-
cussion on covering a vector space by proper subspaces.
4b = (2c + 1 − pa ) (2c + 1 + pa ) .
We obtain m = 1 and
pa = 2b−1 − 1 2b−1 + 1 .
Since the circle Γ is its own inverse, the point U = I(O) is the foot of the polar
of D with respect to this circle. But the quadrilateral AEF N is inscribed in Γ
and AE,N F intersect at D, hence the lines AN and EF intersect on the polar of
D. It follows that this polar is the perpendicular to DO through G and intersects
DO at U .
Now, ∠DU G = ∠DIG = 90◦ , hence U = I(O) and I = I(I) are on the circle
with diameter DG. Thus, this circle is the inverse of the line IO and therefore
DG ⊥ IO, as desired.
We received 26 solutions based on many different ideas and theorems. The follow-
ing solution is by Brian D. Beasley.
We model the hexagons with their common intersection point at the origin, placing
√
the other vertices
√ of the three sides common to that point at (−1, 0), (1/2, 3/2),
and (1/2, − 3/2). Then the sides of the shaded triangle lie on the following lines:
√ å √
√ √
Ç
3 3 3 3
`1 , connecting (−1, 3) and ,− ; its equation is y = − (x+1)+ 3;
2 2 5
Ç √ å √
3 3 3
`2 , connecting − , − and (2, 0); its equation is y = (x − 2);
2 2 7
√ √ √ √
`3 , connecting (0, 3) and (−1, − 3); its equation is y = 2 3x + 3.
Ç √ å
12 2 3
Lines `1 and `2 intersect at A = ,− ;
13 13
Ç √ å
9 5 3
lines `2 and `3 intersect at B = − , − ;
13 13
Ç √ å
3 7 3
lines `3 and `1 intersect at C = − , .
13 13
6
Thus the side lengths of triangle ABC are AB = BC = CA = √ , so the triangle
√ Å √ 13
3 6 2 9 3
ã
is equilateral. Hence its area is √ = .
4 13 13
GE F U AE AH F Q EG
1= · · = · · .
HF EU AF HF QE GA
finite point), it is clear that there was an implicit division by zero somewhere in
the intricate calculations.
and
(x + y + z)|3x2 y 2 z 2 . (2)
implying that
1 1 1
1 xk xk xk−1 1
Z Z Z
= dx ≤ dx ≤ dx =
(a + b)(k + 1) 0 a+b 0 ax + b 0 a+b (a + b)k
and
1 1 1
1 xk xk xk−1 1
Z Z Z
= dx ≤ dx ≤ dx = .
(a + b)(k + 1) 0 a+b 0 bx + a 0 a+b (a + b)k
Multiplying gives
1
(a + b)2 k 2 ≤ ÄR 1 ä ÄR 1 ä ≤ (a + b)2 (k + 1)2 ,
xk xk
0 ax+b
dx 0 bx+a
dx
We thus have
n ÇZ 1 å−1 ÇZ 1 å−1
1 X xk xk (a + b)2
lim 3
dx dx = .
n→∞ n 0 ax + b
k=1 0 bx + a 3
a22 + · · · + a2n 1
(n−1)(a22 +· · ·+a2n ) > (a2 +· · ·+an )2 =⇒ > .
(a2 + · · · + an )3 (n − 1)(a2 + · · · + an )
Letting
a22 + · · · + a2n a21 + · · · + a2n−1
S= + · · · + ,
(a2 + · · · + an )3 (a1 + · · · + an−1 )3
we have
1 1 1
Å ã
S> + ··· + .
n−1 a2 + · · · + an a1 + · · · + an−1
n2 n2
S> = .
(n − 1)[(a2 + · · · + an ) + · · · + (a1 + · · · + an−1 )] (n − 1) (a1 + · · · + an )
2
Thus √
n n
S>
(n − 1)2
as required.
Solution 2.
By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have
with similar expressions for the other terms. Thus, it is sufficient to show that
n √ n √
1 X 1 n n X 1 n n
≥ or ≥√ .
(n − 1)3/2 i=1 1 − a2i (n − 1)2
p p
i=1
1 − a2i n−1
Let f (t) = √1 ,
1−t
where 0 < t < 1. Then f 0 (t) = 1
2(1−t)3/2
> 0, and f 00 (t) =
3
4(1−t)5/2
> 0. Thus, f (t) is an increasing, convex function in (0, 1). Using Jensen’s
inequality for ti = a2i , i = 1, 2, . . . , n, we get
n n √
1 t1 + t2 + · · · + tn 1
Å ã Å ã
X X n n
p = f (ti ) ≥ nf = nf =√ ,
i=1
2
1 − ai i=1
n n n−1
√
which is the desired inequality. Equality occurs when a1 = a2 = · · · = an = 1/ n.