0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views6 pages

Agent-Based Computational Economics

Agent-based computational economics (ACE) is a method of modeling economic systems as dynamic systems of interacting agents. In ACE models, "agents" represent individuals, groups, biological or physical systems. The agents follow rules modeling behavior and interactions. The economy evolves over time as agents interact, with events driven solely by initial conditions without imposing equilibrium. ACE has been applied to areas like asset pricing, competition, and macroeconomics.

Uploaded by

CHINGZU212
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views6 pages

Agent-Based Computational Economics

Agent-based computational economics (ACE) is a method of modeling economic systems as dynamic systems of interacting agents. In ACE models, "agents" represent individuals, groups, biological or physical systems. The agents follow rules modeling behavior and interactions. The economy evolves over time as agents interact, with events driven solely by initial conditions without imposing equilibrium. ACE has been applied to areas like asset pricing, competition, and macroeconomics.

Uploaded by

CHINGZU212
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Agent-based computational economics

Agent-based computational economics (ACE) is the area of computational economics that studies
economic processes, including whole economies, as dynamic systems of interacting agents. As such, it falls
in the paradigm of complex adaptive systems.[1] In corresponding agent-based models, the "agents" are
"computational objects modeled as interacting according to rules" over space and time, not real people. The
rules are formulated to model behavior and social interactions based on incentives and information.[2] Such
rules could also be the result of optimization, realized through use of AI methods (such as Q-learning and
other reinforcement learning techniques).[3]

The theoretical assumption of mathematical optimization by agents in equilibrium is replaced by the less
restrictive postulate of agents with bounded rationality adapting to market forces.[4] ACE models apply
numerical methods of analysis to computer-based simulations of complex dynamic problems for which
more conventional methods, such as theorem formulation, may not find ready use.[5] Starting from initial
conditions specified by the modeler, the computational economy evolves over time as its constituent agents
repeatedly interact with each other, including learning from interactions. In these respects, ACE has been
characterized as a bottom-up culture-dish approach to the study of economic systems.[6]

ACE has a similarity to, and overlap with, game theory as an agent-based method for modeling social
interactions.[7] But practitioners have also noted differences from standard methods, for example in ACE
events modeled being driven solely by initial conditions, whether or not equilibria exist or are
computationally tractable, and in the modeling facilitation of agent autonomy and learning.[8]

The method has benefited from continuing improvements in modeling techniques of computer science and
increased computer capabilities. The ultimate scientific objective of the method is to "test theoretical
findings against real-world data in ways that permit empirically supported theories to cumulate over time,
with each researcher’s work building appropriately on the work that has gone before."[9] The subject has
been applied to research areas like asset pricing,[10] competition and collaboration,[11] transaction costs,[12]
market structure and industrial organization and dynamics,[13] welfare economics,[14] and mechanism
design,[15] information and uncertainty,[16] macroeconomics,[17] and Marxist economics.[18][19]

Overview
The "agents" in ACE models can represent individuals (e.g. people), social groupings (e.g. firms),
biological entities (e.g. growing crops), and/or physical systems (e.g. transport systems). The ACE modeler
provides the initial configuration of a computational economic system comprising multiple interacting
agents. The modeler then steps back to observe the development of the system over time without further
intervention. In particular, system events should be driven by agent interactions without external imposition
of equilibrium conditions.[20] Issues include those common to experimental economics in general[21] and
development of a common framework for empirical validation [22] and resolving open questions in agent-
based modeling.[23]
ACE is an officially designated special interest group (SIG) of the Society for Computational
Economics.[24] Researchers at the Santa Fe Institute have contributed to the development of ACE.

Example: finance
One area where ACE methodology has frequently been applied is asset pricing. W. Brian Arthur, Eric
Baum, William Brock, Cars Hommes, and Blake LeBaron, among others, have developed computational
models in which many agents choose from a set of possible forecasting strategies in order to predict stock
prices, which affects their asset demands and thus affects stock prices. These models assume that agents are
more likely to choose forecasting strategies which have recently been successful. The success of any
strategy will depend on market conditions and also on the set of strategies that are currently being used.
These models frequently find that large booms and busts in asset prices may occur as agents switch across
forecasting strategies.[10][25][26] More recently, Brock, Hommes, and Wagener (2009) have used a model
of this type to argue that the introduction of new hedging instruments may destabilize the market,[27] and
some papers have suggested that ACE might be a useful methodology for understanding the 2008 financial
crisis.[28][29][30] See also discussion under Financial economics § Financial markets and § Departures from
rationality.

See also
ACEGES
Agent-based social simulation
Artificial economics
Artificial financial market
Computational economics
Econophysics
Macroeconomic model
Multi-agent system
Statistical finance

References
1. • W. Brian Arthur, 1994. "Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality (https://ocw.tudelft.nl/
wp-content/uploads/ElFarolArtur1994.pdf)," American Economic Review, 84(2), pp. 406-411
(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~samoore/bit885f2011/arthur-inductive.pdf) Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20130521145936/http://www-personal.umich.edu/~samoore/bit885f
2011/arthur-inductive.pdf) 21 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine.
   • Leigh Tesfatsion, 2003. "Agent-based Computational Economics: Modeling Economies
as Complex Adaptive Systems," Information Sciences, 149(4), pp. 262-268 (http://copper.mat
h.buffalo.edu/urgewiki/uploads/Literature/Tesfatsion2002.pdf) Archived (https://web.archive.o
rg/web/20120426000037/http://copper.math.buffalo.edu/urgewiki/uploads/Literature/Tesfatsi
on2002.pdf) 26 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine.
2. Scott E. Page (2008). "agent-based models," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,
2nd Edition. Abstract (http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_A000218&
edition=current&q=agent-based%20computational%20modeling&topicid=&result_number=
1).
3. Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, The MIT
Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998 [1] (http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~sutton/book/ebook/the-book.htm
l) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20090904194934/http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~sutton/
book/ebook/the-book.html) 4 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine
4. • John H. Holland and John H. Miller (1991). "Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic
Theory," American Economic Review, 81(2), pp. 365-370 (http://www.santafe.edu/media/wor
kingpapers/91-05-025.pdf) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110105015853/http://ww
w.santafe.edu/media/workingpapers/91-05-025.pdf) 5 January 2011 at the Wayback
Machine p. 366.
   • Thomas C. Schelling (1978 [2006]). Micromotives and Macrobehavior, Norton.
Description (http://books.wwnorton.com/books/978-0-393-32946-9/) Archived (https://web.ar
chive.org/web/20171102093240/http://books.wwnorton.com/books/978-0-393-32946-9/) 2
November 2017 at the Wayback Machine, preview (https://books.google.com/books?id=Den
WKRgqzWMC&pg=PA1=).
   • Thomas J. Sargent, 1994. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics, Oxford. Description
(http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Economics/MacroeconomicTheory/?view=u
sa&ci=9780198288695) and chapter-preview 1st-page links. (https://www.questia.com/librar
y/book/bounded-rationality-in-macroeconomics-thomas-j-sargent-by-thomas-j-sargent.jsp)
5. • Kenneth L. Judd, 2006. "Computationally Intensive Analyses in Economics," Handbook of
Computational Economics, v. 2, ch. 17, Introduction, p. 883. [Pp. 881- (https://books.google.c
om/books?id=6ITfRkNmKQcC&pg=PA881) 893. Pre-pub PDF (https://www2.econ.iastate.ed
u/tesfatsi/Judd.finalrev.pdf).
   • _____, 1998. Numerical Methods in Economics, MIT Press. Links to description (http://mit
press.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=3257) Archived (https://web.archive.org/
web/20120211061602/http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=3257) 11
February 2012 at the Wayback Machine and chapter previews (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=9Wxk_z9HskAC&pg=PR7).
6. • Leigh Tesfatsion (2002). "Agent-Based Computational Economics: Growing Economies
from the Bottom Up," Artificial Life, 8(1), pp.55-82. Abstract (http://www.mitpressjournals.org/
doi/abs/10.1162/106454602753694765) and pre-pub PDF (http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/
Peter_Howitt/SummerSchool/Agent.pdf) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2013051414
3904/http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/Peter_Howitt/SummerSchool/Agent.pdf) 14 May 2013
at the Wayback Machine.
   • _____ (1997). "How Economists Can Get Alife," in W. B. Arthur, S. Durlauf, and D. Lane,
eds., The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, II, pp. 533-564. Addison-Wesley. Pre-
pub PDF (http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/18196/1/er37.pdf) Archived (https://web.ar
chive.org/web/20120415135342/http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/18196/1/er37.pdf)
15 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine.
7. • Joseph Y. Halpern (2008). "computer science and game theory," The New Palgrave
Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract (http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/articl
e?id=pde2008_C000566&edition=current&q=&topicid=&result_number=1).
   • Yoav Shoham (2008). "Computer Science and Game Theory," Communications of the
ACM, 51(8), pp. 75-79 (http://www.robotics.stanford.edu/~shoham/www%20papers/CSGT-C
ACM-Shoham.pdf) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120426005917/http://www.roboti
cs.stanford.edu/~shoham/www%20papers/CSGT-CACM-Shoham.pdf) 26 April 2012 at the
Wayback Machine.
   • Alvin E. Roth (2002). "The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and
Computation as Tools for Design Economics," Econometrica, 70(4), pp. 1341–1378 (https://
web.archive.org/web/20040414102216/http://kuznets.fas.harvard.edu/~aroth/papers/engine
er.pdf).
8. Tesfatsion, Leigh (2006), "Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach
to Economic Theory," ch. 16, Handbook of Computational Economics, v. 2, part 2, ACE study
of economic system. Abstract (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574002105
020162) and pre-pub PDF (http://econ2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/hbintlt.pdf).
9. • Leigh Tesfatsion (2006). "Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive
Approach to Economic Theory," ch. 16, Handbook of Computational Economics, v. 2, [pp.
831-880] sect. 5. Abstract (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574002105020
162) and pre-pub PDF (http://econ2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/hbintlt.pdf).
   • Kenneth L. Judd (2006). "Computationally Intensive Analyses in Economics," Handbook
of Computational Economics, v. 2, ch. 17, pp. 881- (https://books.google.com/books?id=6ITf
RkNmKQcC&pg=PA881) 893. Pre-pub PDF (https://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/Judd.fin
alrev.pdf).
   • Leigh Tesfatsion and Kenneth L. Judd, ed. (2006). Handbook of Computational
Economics, v. 2. Description (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/6
60847/description#description) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120306100156/htt
p://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/660847/description#description)
6 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine & and chapter-preview links. (http://www.sciencedire
ct.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_hubEid=1-s2.0-S1574002105X02003&_cid=27337
7&_pubType=HS&_auth=y&_acct=C000228598&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&
md5=e4757b4f65755ed6340a11fee9615200)
10. B. Arthur, J. Holland, B. LeBaron, R. Palmer, P. Taylor (1997), 'Asset pricing under
endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market,' in The Economy as an Evolving
Complex System II, B. Arthur, S. Durlauf, and D. Lane, eds., Addison Wesley.
11. Robert Axelrod (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition
and Collaboration, Princeton. Description (http://press.princeton.edu/titles/6144.html),
contents (http://press.princeton.edu/titles/6144.html#TOC), and preview (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=J0dgRGMdjmQC&pg=PR11).
12. Tomas B. Klosa and Bart Nooteboom, 2001. "Agent-based Computational Transaction Cost
Economics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25(3–4), pp. 503–52. Abstract. (htt
p://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188900000348)
13. • Roberto Leombruni and Matteo Richiardi, ed. (2004), Industry and Labor Dynamics: The
Agent-Based Computational Economics Approach. World Scientific Publishing ISBN 981-
256-100-5. Description (http://www.worldscibooks.com/economics/5706.html) Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20100727221149/http://www.worldscibooks.com/economics/5706.h
tml) 27 July 2010 at the Wayback Machine and chapter-preview links (https://books.google.c
om/books?id=P5O7A5D55nQC&pg=PR5).
   • Joshua M. Epstein (2006). "Growing Adaptive Organizations: An Agent-Based
Computational Approach," in Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based
Computational Modeling, pp. 309- (https://books.google.com/books?id=543OS3qdxBYC&pg
=PA309) 344. Description (http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8277.html) Archived (https://web.a
rchive.org/web/20120126180655/http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8277.html) 26 January
2012 at the Wayback Machine and abstract (http://www.santafe.edu/research/working-paper
s/abstract/99895b6465e8b87656612f8e3570b34c/).
14. Robert Axtell (2005). "The Complexity of Exchange," Economic Journal, 115(504, Features),
pp. F193-F210 (http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/pboettke/workshop/archives/f05/Axtell.pdf).
15. • The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2008), 2nd Edition:
     Roger B. Myerson "mechanism design." Abstract. (http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/
article?id=pde2008_M000132&edition=current&q=mechanism%20design&topicid=&result_
number=3)
     _____. "revelation principle." Abstract. (http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=
pde2008_R000137&edition=current&q=moral&topicid=&result_number=1)
     Tuomas Sandholm. "computing in mechanism design." Abstract. (http://www.dictionaryofe
conomics.com/article?id=pde2008_C000563&edition=&field=keyword&q=algorithmic%20m
echanism%20design&topicid=&result_number=1)
   • Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen (2001). "Algorithmic Mechanism Design," Games and
Economic Behavior, 35(1-2), pp. 166–196 (https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sandholm/cs15-892F0
9/Algorithmic%20mechanism%20design.pdf).
   • Noam Nisan et al., ed. (2007). Algorithmic Game Theory, Cambridge University Press.
Description (http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/asia/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521872829)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120505140924/http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/asia/catal
ogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521872829) 5 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine.
16. Tuomas W. Sandholm and Victor R. Lesser (2001). "Leveled Commitment Contracts and
Strategic Breach," Games and Economic Behavior, 35(1-2), pp. 212-270 (https://www.cs.cm
u.edu/afs/.cs.cmu.edu/Web/People/sandholm/leveled.geb.pdf).
17. • David Colander, Peter Howitt, Alan Kirman, Axel Leijonhufvud, and Perry Mehrling, 2008.
"Beyond DSGE Models: Toward an Empirically Based Macroeconomics," American
Economic Review, 98(2), pp. 236 (https://www.jstor.org/pss/29730026)-240. Pre-pub PDF (ht
tp://www.brown.edu/Departments/Economics/Faculty/Peter_Howitt/publication/complex%20
macro6.pdf).
   • Thomas J. Sargent (1994). Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics, Oxford. Description
(http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Economics/MacroeconomicTheory/?view=u
sa&ci=9780198288695) and chapter-preview 1st-page links (https://www.questia.com/librar
y/book/bounded-rationality-in-macroeconomics-thomas-j-sargent-by-thomas-j-sargent.jsp).
   • M. Oeffner (2009). 'Agent-based Keynesian Macroeconomics (http://www.opus-bayern.d
e/uni-wuerzburg/volltexte/2009/3927/pdf/OeffnerDissohneAnhang.pdf)'. PhD thesis, Faculty
of Economics, University of Würzburg.
18. A. F. Cottrell, P. Cockshott, G. J. Michaelson, I. P. Wright, V. Yakovenko (2009), Classical
Econophysics. Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-47848-9.
19. Leigh Tesfatsion (2006), "Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach
to Economic Theory," ch. 16, Handbook of Computational Economics, v. 2, part 2, ACE study
of economic system. Abstract (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574002105
020162) and pre-pub PDF (http://econ2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/hbintlt.pdf).
20. Summary of methods (http://www.socsci.aau.dk/ae2006/) Archived (https://web.archive.org/w
eb/20070526105550/http://www.socsci.aau.dk/ae2006/) 26 May 2007 at the Wayback
Machine: Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University,
Denmark website.
21. Vernon L. Smith, 2008. "experimental economics," The New Palgrave Dictionary of
Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract (http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde200
8_E000277&q=experimental%20&topicid=&result_number=2).
22. Bektas, A., Piana, V. & Schuman, R. A meso-level empirical validation approach for agent-
based computational economic models drawing on micro-data: a use case with a mobility
mode-choice model. SN Bus Econ 1, 80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00083-4
23. Giorgio Fagiolo, Alessio Moneta, and Paul Windrum, 2007. "A Critical Guide to Empirical
Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics: Methodologies, Procedures, and Open
Problems," Computational Economics, 30, pp. 195 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10614-007-
9104-4)–226.
24. Society for Computational Economics (http://comp-econ.org/) website.
25. W. Brock and C. Hommes (1997), 'A rational route to randomness.' Econometrica 65 (5), pp.
1059-1095.
26. C. Hommes (2008), 'Interacting agents in finance,' in The New Palgrave Dictionary of
Economics.
27. Brock, W.; Hommes, C.; Wagener, F. (2009). "More hedging instruments may destabilize
markets" (http://cendef.uva.nl/binaries/content/assets/subsites/amsterdam-school-of-econom
ics/amsterdam-school-of-economics-research-institute/cendef/working-papers-2006/brohom
wag.pdf?1417181713282) (PDF). Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 33 (11):
1912–1928. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2009.05.004 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jedc.2009.05.004).
28. M. Buchanan (2009), 'Meltdown modelling. Could agent-based computer models prevent
another financial crisis? (http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mark.buchanan/nature_economic_mod
elling.pdf).' Nature, Vol. 460, No. 7256. (5 August 2009), pp. 680-682.
29. J.D. Farmer, D. Foley (2009), 'The economy needs agent-based modelling.' Nature, Vol.
460, No. 7256. (5 August 2009), pp. 685-686.
30. M. Holcombe, S. Coakley, M.Kiran, S. Chin, C. Greenough, D.Worth, S.Cincotti, M.Raberto,
A. Teglio, C. Deissenberg, S. van der Hoog, H. Dawid, S. Gemkow, P. Harting, M. Neugart.
Large-scale Modeling of Economic Systems, Complex Systems, 22(2), 175-191, 2013

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agent-


based_computational_economics&oldid=1145278847"

You might also like