EXERCISE 2 HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Name: Estepa, Edrianne M. Score
Course & Year: BPA - 2A Date: 12-01-2022
Directions: Answer what is being asked for each of the following.
A. Test systematically the corresponding hypothesis. Use data analysis of Microsoft Excel
to test the following conjectures.
1-10. Test the conjecture that performance of the experimental group is better than the control
group using the programmed material in statistics at 0.05 level of significance.
a) Ho: The performance of the experimental group is not better than the control
group using the programmed material in statistics.
b) Hi: The performance of the experimental group is better than the control group
using the programmed material in statistics.
c) α= 0.05 (One-tailed)
K. Decision: Reject H0 and accept H1 and conclude that there is significant difference
in the performance of the experimental group is not better than the control group
using the programmed material or statistics.
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Su
Groups Count m Average Variance
Student 8 36 4.5 6
10.8392
EG 8 173 21.625 9
12.6964
CG 8 135 16.875 3
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
1250.58 625.291 63.5120 1.24E-0
Between Groups 3 2 7 9 9 3.4668
9.84523
Within Groups 206.75 21 8
1457.33
Total 3 23
M. Given: x2 = 21.625 x4= 16.875 K= 1
1. a) x2 & x4
2. (21.625 – 16. 875)2/ 9.85(1/8+ 1/8) (2) = 9.1624
3. F-test =√(1)(3.47) = 1.86
4.. a. Since the computed value for Fa sheffe test (9.16) is greater than F test (1.86)
therefore; there is significant difference between methods A&B.
11-20. In a study conducted by graduating students in the College of Arts and
Management in DMMMSUMLUC the following data were recorded to determine the level
of effectiveness of the computerized registration during enrollment in min per
transaction. Assuming the populations to be normally distributed, is there sufficient
evidence, at the 0.05 level of significance to say that computerized registration
influences the length of time to finish enrollment registration?
a) Ho: There is no significant difference on the level of effectiveness to say that
computerized registration influences the length of time to finish enrollment
registration.
b) H1: There is a significant difference on the level of effectiveness to say that
computerized registration influences the length of time to finish enrollment
registration.
c) α= 0.05 (One-tailed)
K. Decision: Reject H0 and Accept H1 and conclude that there is significant
difference on the level of effectiveness to say that computerized registration
influences the length of time to finish enrollment registration.
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Su
Groups Count m Average Variance
Before
(Mins/Trans) 8 199 24.875 24.125
After(Mins/Trans 8.41071
) 8 129 16.125 4
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
306.2 18.8254 0.00068 4.6001
Between Groups 5 1 306.25 7 1 1
227.7 16.2678
Within Groups 5 14 6
Total 534 15
M. Given: x1 = 24.88 x2 = 16.125 K= 2
1. a) x1 & x2
2. (24.88 – 16.13)/ 16.27(1/8 + 1/8)(2) = 9.41
3. √(2)(4.47) = 3.03
4. a. since the computed value for Fa sheffe test (9.41) is greater than F-test (3.03)
therefore there is significant difference between Method A&B.
21-30. Test the conjecture that there is a significant difference on the level of
effectiveness of the Performance Appraisal System as to Educational Attainment as
perceived by the three groups.
a) Ho: There is no significant difference on the level of effectiveness of the
Performance Appraisal System as to Educational Attainment.
b) H1: There is a significant difference on the level of effectiveness of the
Performance Appraisal System as to Educational Attainment.
c) α= (Two-tailed)
K. Decision: Accept H0 and Reject H1 and conclude that there is a no significant
difference on the level of effectiveness of the Performance Appraisal System as to
Educational Attainment.
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
indicator
s 6 21 3.5 3.5
3.56333 0.20222
Group 1 6 21.38 3 7
Group 2 6 21.48 3.58 0.26396
3.52333 0.71838
Group 3 6 21.14 3 7
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between 0.02406 0.00802 0.99919 3.09839
Groups 7 3 2 0.00685 3 1
Within 23.4228 1.17114
Groups 7 20 3
23.4469
Total 3 23
M. Given
x20= 3.56
x30= 3.58
x40= 3.52
1. A. x20 & x40
B. x40 & x30
C. x20 & x30
2. Fa = (3.56 – 3.52)2 / 1.17 (1/6 + 1/6) (2) =2.05
Fb= (3.52– 3.58)2 / 1.17 (1/6 + 1/6) (2) = 4.62
Fc= (3.56– 3.58)2 / 1.17 (1/6 + 1/6) (2) = 5.13
3. F-test = √(2)(3.10) = 2.49
4. a. since the computed value for Fa sheffe test (2.05) less than F-test (2.49)
therefore, there is no significant between method A&C
b. since the computed value for Fb sheffe test (4.62) greater than F-test (2.49)
therefore, there is significant between method C&B
c. 1. since the computed value for Fc sheffe test (5.13) greater than F-test
(2.49) therefore, there is significant between method A&B
Factor A- Subjects Factor B- Classification of Achievers
English 70 75 85
Math 72 80 88
76 85 92
75 82 95
70 80 86
72 82 90
76 84 88
70 85 92
Anova: Two-Factor With Replication
SUMMARY Factor B- Classification of Achievers Total
English
Count 8 8 8 24
Sum 581 653 716 1950
Average 72.625 81.625 89.5 81.25
Variance 7.125 11.125 11.42857 58.63043
Total
Count 8 8 8
Sum 581 653 716
Average 72.625 81.625 89.5
Variance 7.125 11.125 11.42857
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Sample 0 0 65535 65535 #NUM! #NUM!
2.96E-
Columns 1140.75 2 570.375 57.65523 09 3.4668
Interaction 0 0 65535 65535 #NUM! #NUM!
Within 207.75 21 9.892857
Total 1348.5 23
