‘TIL-VPES/FR/TAGL, Tss/Rev no: 01/00, Tssue Date: 15.08.2022 Transformer Testing Laboratory, Vishvas Power Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur Internal Audit Calendar Year: 2022-23 Sr. | Section | Aug | sept | Oct | Nov] Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar Apr | M21 jun | gut lq Top or ” Management | Quality ] . 2. | Manager + HR, ” ” Purchase - e 3, | Lab/Technical eG oy Requirements Note: Audit as per ISO 17025:2017 standard requirements, Internal audit frequency is atleast twice in year. Internal audit will start with Opening meeting and end with closing meeting, e Date: 0 | 032022 Quality Manager‘TIL-VPES/FRAASC, fev no: O14, Ie Date 15082022 Transformer Testing Laboratory, Vishvas Power Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur INTERNAL AUDIT SCHEDULE-I e. Note : Lunch Time 1.30 pm to 2.30 pm 1s) )]Q020 “Audit | ] SN : Criteria Date of ; : : Section lodacn | car Time Auditor Auditee Cis. under) Opening Meeting ayn z072-| team, | TOR Manette & Mamageroett 1 Top ] Management _| 4 1.49.5.6.1- 1.2022 | 11.00am-/ Mr. RajeevM. | Mt Kiran Qu 6.6,8.1-89 | 21112022 | 1 oom | Bhave eee 2 | Manager+HR,| °°° Shreyas Bhave Purchase : Z a | i | Mr. Gitendra Patle, | 3 | Lab/Fechnieal | 46.1-65,7.1-| 91 419999 | 200pm- | Mr. Rajeev, | Mt Gena Pat Requirements | 7.11,84-86 5.30 pm Bhave aaa | | 2 i i Top Management & Management Cote i eet 21.11.2022 | 5:30pm | Coonmittes - Audit Scope: ISO/IEC 17025:2017, Quality Manual, Quality System Procedure, Quality Test Procedure. Quality ManagerTTL-VPES/FR/TASR, Iss/Rey ne: 01/00, Issue Date: 15.08.2022 Transformer Testing Laboratory, Vishvas Power Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur INTERNAL AUDIT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TA Date: 21.11.2022 Sr. | Clause NCRIAudit Findings ‘Corrective Action ‘Compliance Ne. Statas/Remarks | T | 86 | Customer Tesdback system not eablshed as por | Customer Teedback sysiem Stablished z laid procedure. as per laid procedure. Counr 2 | 78 | Westrepor as pore 150 170352017 & “Test report as pare IS 170252017 ‘pplcable IS requirement- Unique Test Report | & applicable IS requirement- Unique numbering, Observation not evident. ‘Test Report numbering, Observation oan | updated 3. 16 “Measurement uncertainty considering the ‘Measurement uncertainty for all i contributors like accuracy not evident. parameters considering the comtibutors | Complied ensured, 4] 74 | Sample aceapianceereron as per applicable IS | Sample aeplancseriteron as per @ standard not defined and documented. applicable IS standard defined and Complied documented S| 62 | Competency Evaluation ofthe personel as par | Competency Evaluation of the 150 17025:2017 requirement not evident personnel as per 80 17025:2017 Comptied requirement evident © | 63 | Labsafty and inffastractrl inspestion Tab safe and infarct Provision of aft resources like Personal | inspection: Provision of safety Protective equipment PPEs, First Aid Box, fire | resources like PPEs, First Aid Box, fire jComnptien Extinguisher not evident Extinguisher evident. 7. 64 Equipments are not labeled as per ISO 17025 Equipments are labeled as per ISO. rs ‘standard requirements. 17025 standard requirements. oupies 8 65 Metrological traceability certificates of Metrological traceability certificates of Calibration certificates needs o be ensured as | Calitration certificates is ensued as Complied per NABL/ISO 17034 standard per NABL/ISO 17034 standard @ [562 | eaining Eteiveness evaluation record not | Training: Esctveness evaluation evident. Ref. Technical training on IS standards | record prepared. ome 10. 7.7 | Quality Assurance activities as per plan to be Quality Assurance activities as per plan ensured. Eg. Intra ab testing, Retained sample | is ensured. Complied testing ete (fr applicable parameters) 1, | 4142 | Declaration of Imparaliy & Contentalty of | Dedaraion of imparialiy © staff no evident in HR File Confidentiality of staff availed in HR Compled File Date: 24+). gape Quality Manager‘TIL-VPES/FR/AOBR, I/Rev no: O1/ 0, Issue Date: 15.08 2022 Transformer Testing Laboratory, Vishvas Power Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur AUDIT OBSERVATION REPORT Name of the section: LMS + Technical Raquiremsid Jak feat |r Name of Auditee : Mr. Kiran Joharpurkar, Mr. Shreyas Bhaye, Mr. Gitendra Patle Audit No. 1A Date 21.11.2022 Ref 2 ISO 17025:2017 & NABL 219 { & ‘RemarkiSp — Observation oa | | excR/Obse vation) 40 - General Requirements a1 [impart Caboratory activities are underiaken impartially in dructured way and are managed so | as to safeguard impartiality | | Lab activity is carried out in impartially through Sample Coding(FR/SRR), Declaration | 4.1.1 | of Confidentiality & impartiality (FR/DIC), etc. Procedure for impartiality & | confidentiality “Procedure |: Impartiality & Confidential Of Information And NcR | Proprietary Rights Of Customer’ prepared. Ref. TTL-VPES/QSP | Declaration of Impartiality & Confidentiality of staff not evident in HR File | a | The laboratory management are committed to impartiality, ‘Commitment of management towards impartially is seen through Coding(FR/SRR), | 412 | Declaration of Confidentiality(FR/DIC) , Authorization list (FR/AL), Access List (FR/ACL) ete. ae The laboratory is responsible for the impartiality of its laboratory activities and has not allow commercial, financial or other pressures to compromise impartiality‘The laboratory has identified risks to its impartiality on an on-going basis. This includes risks that arise from its activities, or from its relationships, or from the relationships of its personnel. However, these relationships are not present a laboratory with a risk to impartiality ‘The laboratory has identified risk to its impartiality for all the lab activities as (FR/RAC): Risk of Impartiality: Control, CCTV, Coding to sample, Testing is independent activity, Access control ete. "| Considering overall system controls, risk to impartiality is identified, the laboratory has demonstrated how it eliminated or minimized these risk Lab has identified the risk and forall significance risk the mechanism of its control is demonstrated in FR/RAC, Ref. Risk: Malfunctioning/Breakdown of Equipments, Control: AMC, Calibration, MU calculations/ Intermediate checks Confidentiality 421 The laboratory is responsible, through legally enforceable commitments, for the ‘management of all information obtained or created during the performance of laboratory activities. The laboratory has informed the customer in advance, of the information it intends to place in the public domain. Except for information that the customer makes publicly available, or when agreed between the laboratory and the customer (eg for the purpose of responding to complaints), all other information is considered proprietary information and are regarded as confidential Lab has informed its customer in advance through a mail regarding the information it is_| going to intends in public domain 422 ‘When the laboratory is required by law or authorized by coniractual arrangements to release confidential information, the customer or individual concerned, unless prohibited by law, is notified ofthe information provided 423 Information about the customer obtained from sources other than the customer (e.g, complainant, regulators) kept confidential between the customer and the laboratory. The provider (source) of this information also maintained confidential to the laboratory and isnot shared with the customer, unless agreed by the source. ‘The laboratory does not receive any complaint till date. 424 Personnel, including any committee members, contractors, personnel of external bodies, or individuals acting on the laboratory's behalf, is kept confidential covering. all information obtained or created during the performance of laboratory activities, except as required by law. Structural Requirements3.17 Structural Requirem ent The laboratory is a legal entity, or a defined part of a legal entity, that is legally responsible for its laboratory activities. The laboratory register under — Certificate of Incorporation 11-101738 dt 08.08.1996, Factory Act 1948: 120502710200942 dt. 12.10.2020 be) ‘The laboratory has identified management that has overall responsibility for the laboratory. Ref Organization Structure, HR File ‘The lab has defined the structure of the management in organization chart, they have overall responsibility of lab activity 33 54 ‘The laboratory has defined and documented the range of laboratory activities for which it conforms with this document. The laboratory only claims conformity with this document for this range of laboratory activities, which excludes externally provided laboratory activities on an ongoing basis. ‘The laboratory is testing laboratory with permanent facility and does not have any other lab (site lab). The scope of the lab is very well defined in Annexure “A” ‘Laboratory activities are to meet the requirements of standard, the laboratory's customers, regulatory authorities and organizations providing recognition. Lab has followed the standard ISO 17025:2017 and implement the system accordingly, Lab does not performed sampling activity. Laboratory activities performed in all ts permanent facilities, at sites away from its permanent facilites, in associated temporary or mobile facilities or at a customer's facility: Lab has permanent facility and does not have any site facility. 55a ‘Lab has defined the organization and management structure of the laboratory, its place in any parent organization, and the relationships between management, technical ‘operations and support services. ‘The laboratory has developed organization structure by showing its parent organization including technical manager, other staff members by showing their relationship. Ref Organization Chart, HR File 55. b. Lab has specified the responsibility, authority and interelationship of all personnel who manage, perform or verify work affecting the results of laboratory activities Laboratory has defined the roles and responsibilities ofall the staff members of the lab as per Annexure C 550 Lab has documented its procedures to the extent necessary to ensure the consistent application of its laboratory activities and the validity of the results Lab has established required documents, procedures, forms and format as needed for laboratory activities are evident56 ‘The laboratory have personnel who, irrespective of other responsibilities, have the authority and resources needed to carry out their duties. Lab has appointed one of its staff members as a Quality manager (Mr. R.U. Sambhe) wide letter of appointment dated. 02.04.2022 including all its responsibilities and. authorities. 5.6a, Lab have dedicated personnel for implementation, maintenance and improvement of the management system Laboratory has various medium of communication such as whatsapp, emails, notice boards etc forthe effectiveness of management system are evident. Ref. Responsibility & Authority, HR File 56b Lab have dedicated personnel for identification of deviations irom the management system or from the procedures for performing laboratory activities ‘The integrity of the management system is evident. Ref. Responsibility & Authority, HR File 5.60 Lab have dedicated personnel for initiation of actions to prevent or minimize such deviations, Ref. Responsibility & Authority, HR File 56d ‘Lab have dedicated personnel for reporting to laboratory management on the performance of the management system and any need for improvement; Ref Responsibility & Authority, HR File 56e Lab have dedicated personnel for ensuring the effectiveness ‘of laboratory activities Ref. Responsibility & Authority, HR File s7 Laboratory management have ensured that- communication takes place regarding the effectiveness of the management system and the importance of meeting customers’ and other requirements; . the integrity of the management system is maintained when changes to the ‘management system are planned and implemented Resource Requirements 6A “The laboratory have adequate availability of personnel, facilities, equipment, systems and support services necessary to manage and perform its laboratory activities 62 Personnel 621/ Personnel ‘Lab ensure that all its staff internal or external, who could influence the lab activities ‘are impartial, competent and work in accordance with the laboratory's management system & for that lab has taken oath from them (FR/DIC)i Laboratory has identified the various competencies required for each functions with | 622 | respect to education, qualification, training , echnical knowledge and skills as per FR/COM | Laboratory has ensured thatthe personnel have the competence to perform laboratory | activities for which they are responsible and to evaluate the significance of deviations | Laboratory has to carry its competency evaluation of all staff members through | 623 | FRICOM for various skis required. Head of the lab regularly monitored the same | Training; Effectiveness evaluation record not evident. NCR Competency Evaluation of the personnel as per ISO 17025:2017 requirement not | evident | Laboratory has defined the roles and responsibility and authorities for the all the | 24. | sboratory staf sper Annexure “Cis evident ‘The management of the laboratory has communicated to personnel their duties, responsibilities and authorities, Ref. Signs of staff related to communication. "| Laboratory has established a procedure ing QSP/TRG is evident. Laboratory has maintained the records of the followings. Competency evaluation of staff is carried out and maintained its record FRICOM '. Selection of lab personnel is carried out. ie Educational and professional qualifications details of staff FR/ LOE | © Training details ofthe stafF in individual training record (FR/ITR). 4 Days | LOMS & TA Training: 20-23.04.2022 | 4. Supervision of lab is carried out by appointed lab staff Mr. Patle is identified for | supervision. ©. Authorization list for various activities is also evident as (FRV/AL). Monitoring competence of personnel is carried out by Lab Director FRICOM. Top management provided authorization to lab personnel forall the laboratory | activities- | & development, modification, verification and validation of methods, | 626 analysis of results, including statements of conformity or opinions and | interpretations; | report, review and authorization of results. | Ref, FRVAL. The same is evident and followed. 63 | Facilities and environmental conditions| 63.7 Facilities and invironm ental condition The facilities and environmental conditions suitable for the laboratory activities are ‘maintained and ensured that they are not adversely affect the validity of results Laboratory has identified the environmental condition needed for the its laboratory activities. Such as Temperature, humidity ete Lab safety and infrastructural inspection, Provision of safety resources like PPEs, First ‘Aid Box, fire Extinguisher not evident. Electrical inspection of lab to be carried out Provision of AC to software-based system not evident-NA 632 ‘The requirements for facilities and environmental conditions necessary for the performance of the laboratory activities are documented, ‘The various requirements for identified environmental conditions are documented in FR/ AEC, | 633 The laboratory monitors, controls and records environmental conditions in accordance with relevant specifications, methods or procedures or where they influence the validity of the results. ‘The environmental condition which is identified and documented are properly ‘monitored and recorded. The records FR/ECR is evident. 634 ‘Measures to control facilities is implemented, monitored and periodically reviewed and includes: @ access to and use of areas affecting laboratory activities; ‘Lab has limited access in the laboratory, for that they prepared access list to the lab as FRVALL. , prevention of contamination, interference or adverse influences on laboratory activities, Ref. Close supervision. ©. effective separation between areas with incompatible laboratory activities. Ref. Dedicated area. dentified environmental conditions are properly reviewed, analysed periodically in review meetings. Lab has a good separation between different activities to avoid any interference during testing from one to another. Lab does not have any testing facility outside its permanent facility EquipmentThe laboratory have access to equipment (including, but not limited to, measuring | instruments, software, measurement standards, reference materials, reference data, 64s | oY | seapetig Sopa orantdiysppette) thats rece fra oct | POP | eee ety seven an tc lene tt ro. “| the laboratory has identified personnel for using particular equipment inthe laboratory in Authorisation list FR/AL [6442 | Laboratory doesnot uses its equipments outside its permanent contol Laboratory has established a procedure for handling, transpor, storage, use and planned | 6.4.3 | maintenance of equipment as QSP/HTSUPME in order to ensure proper functioning and to prevent contamination or deterioration The laboratory verifies that equipment conforms to specified requirements before being placed or retumed into service | 644 | Laboratory ensures proper functioning of equipment when equipment return from either service or when new equipment is installed. Its evident that lab does not send | cavipment ouside ts pemanent control Maintenance isdone inthe labitsalt | ‘The equipment used for measurement are capable of achieving the measurement accuracy and/or measurement uncertainty required to provide a valid result All equipments used for testing are giving valid results, the same is checked by testing with certified reference material 646 “Measuring equipment are calibrated when ~ the measurement accuracy or measurement uncertainty affects the validity of the reported results, and/or ~ _ calibration of the equipment is required to establish the metrological traceability of the reported results. Calibration of equipments are carried out on regular basis from the accredited calibration agency is evident. For example. CTM, ID of equipment: JDIET/2014-15/CIVILIRCC-CTM, Id.No. KPASPIOL Date of Calibration. 07.01.2022, Due date of calibration 06.01.2022 Calibration agency; Shrikrupa Calibartion & Servicing Center, Amravati 647 ‘Laboratory has calibration plan forall the equipment required calibration in FRILOE. ‘Same is reviewed and adjusted as necessary in order to maintain confidence in the status of ration As per plan all equipments are calibrated.| 648 lll equipment requiring calibration or which has a defined period of validity are labelled, coded or otherwise identified to allow the user of the equipment to readily identify the status of calibration or period of validity. Equipment are not properly labelled. with details such as, Name of the equipment: CTM, ID of equipment: JDIET/2014-15/CIVILIRCC-CTM, I4NNo. KP/SP/01 Date of Calibration, 07.01.2022, Due date of calibration 06.01.2022 | Calibration agency; Shrikrupa Calibartion & Servicing Center, Amravati, location: RCC Lab ete | Equipment that has been subjected to overloading or mishandling, gives questionable results, or has been shown to be defective or outside specified requirements, are taken ut of service, It is isolated to prevent its use or clearly labelled or marked as being out Of service until it has been verified to perform correctly. The laboratory examines the effect of the defect or deviation from specified requirements and initiates the ‘management of nonconforming work procedure. Lab has identified the notin used equipment by putting valid label on it. NCR 64.10 Lab has developed a procedure for intermediate checks needed for the performance oF ‘the equipment as QSP/IMC to maintain confidence in the performance of the equipment. Lab has also developed plan for intermediate checks such FR/IMCP. Intermediate checks are carried out as per the plan and record is maintained in intermediate check register. FR/IMCR js evident. When calibration and reference material data include reference values or correction factors, the laboratory ensures the reference values and correction factors are updated and implemented, as appropriate, to meet specified requirements. ‘No correction factor is needed nor applied on any equipment ‘The laboratory takes practicable measures to prevent unintended adjustments oF ‘equipment from invalidating results. ‘Various measures to prevent unintended adjustment is evident. Such as, no outside person is allowed in the lab, all equipment are handled by authorized person only.64.13 ‘Records are retained for equipment which can influence laboratory activities. The records (as instrument label)include the following, where applicable: a the identity of equipment, including software and firmware version; b the manufacturer's name, type identification, and serial number or other unique identification; © evidence of verification that equipment conforms with specified requirements; the current location; € calibration dates, results of calibrations, adjustments, acceptance criteria, and the due date of the next calibration or the calibration interval; f documentation of reference materials, results, acceptance criteria, relevant dates and the period of validity; | the maintenance plan and maintenance carried out to date, where relevant to the performance of the equipment, h details of any damage, malfunction, modification to, or repair of, the ‘equipment Various records of equipments are maintained by the labs are evident, such as, name of the equipment, identification given by the lab, name of manufacturer, modeV/Sr. No., location of equipments, calibration status or details, reference material detail, Preventive maintenance plane and its checklist ete 65 Metrotogical traceability Laboratory has established and maintain. metrological traceability of its measurement by means of a documented unbroken chain of calibration by obtaining a valid traceable certificate from the service provider. Traceability certificate of the reference material from which calibration done is not evident Metrological traceability certificates of Calibration certificates needs to be ensured as per NABL/ISO 17034 standard NCR 652 ‘The laboratory shail ensure that measurement resuits are traceabie to the International System of Units (SI) through: «calibration provided by a competent laboratory; or b. certified values of certified reference materials provided by a competent producer with stated metrological traceability to the Si: or ¢. direct realization of the SI units ensured by comparison, directly or indirectly, with national or intemational standards. It is evident that all measurement carried out by lab are in SI units only653 When met ily possible, the laboratory | demonstrates metrological traceability to an appropriate reference, e.g. @ certified values of certified reference materials provided by a competent producer; standards that are clearly described and accepted as providing measurement results fit for their intended use and ensured by suitable comparison, Itis evident that all measurement carried out by lab are in SI units only. Therefore itis ‘not required to established or demonstrate metrological traceability by appropriate reference material 66 Externally provided products and services 66 Extemally products and ‘The laboratory has ensured that only suitable externally provided produets and services that affect laboratory activities are used, when such products and services: ‘are intended for incorporation into the laboratory’s own activities, bare provided, in part or in full, directly to the customer by the laboratory, as received from the external provider, © are used to support the operation of the laboratory. Laboratory has identified its required to take from externally provided product and service provider, those service are, calibration, annual maintenance contract, Air condition repaired ete | 6.62 The laboratory have a procedure(QSP/EPSS) and retained records for: @ defining, reviewing and approving the laboratory's requirements for externally provided products and services, b defining the criteria for evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance and re- | evaluation of the external providers, © ensuring that extemally provided products and services conform to the laboratory's established requirements, or when applicable, to the relevant requirements of this document, before they are used or directly provided to the customer, 4 taking any actions arising from evaluations, monitoring of performance and re- evaluations of the external providers. Procedure for externally provided product and service is established and maintained by the lab (QSP/EPSS). List of critical item is prepared Evaluation of the supplier of the same is also carried out as per FR/SEV.‘The laboratory has communicated its requirements to external providers for: a the products and services to be provided: b the acceptance criteria, | © competence, including any required qualification of personnel; 663 |d activities that the laboratory, or its customer, intends to perform at the extemal provider's premises. Ref POWO Various requirements of services avail by the lab is communicated to the externally | provider is evident through mail, these requirements were also mentioned in work order also, 7 | Process Requirements | 7.1 | Review of requests, tenders and contracts Laboratory has established a procedure for the review, request tenders and contracts as | QSP/RRTC which address- | 1117 [a the requirements are adequately defined, documented and understood; | Review of | b the laboratory has the capability and resources to meet the requirements; request | © where external providers are used, the requirements of 6 6 are applied and the tender and | laboratory advises the customer of the specific laboratory activities to be performed by contracts | the external provider and gains the customer's approval; d the appropriate methods or procedures are selected and are capable of meeting | the customers’ requirements ‘The laboratory informs the customer when the method requested by the customer is 71.2 _ | considered tobe inappropriate or out of date Ref. FR/TRR | Lab has already defined the scope of the lab includ tc. There was no incident recorded when the details are missing from the customer. parameters, range, method used ‘Lab provided the statement of conformity if customer asked for the same Unless inherent in the requested specification or standard, the decision rule selected is 713. | communicated to, and agreed with, the customer FR/TRR ‘The statement of conformity provided . The decision rule is set and have accepted by | the customer is evident ‘Any differences between the request or tender and the contract is resolved before | laboratory activities commence. Fach contract is acceptable hath to the laboratory and Ihcvits | decile nedaite requested by the customer does not impact the integrity of the laboratory or the validity of the results. Laboratory has resolve the difference if any before being started its testing activity. alee Es sol | TLS | The customer is informed for any deviation from the contract.Ifa contract is amended after work has commenced, the contract review is, repeated/amended and any amendments is communicated to all affected personnel. 718 | as ot participate in any tender and contac hence the requirement i ot applied on the lab. ‘The laboratory cooperates with customers or their representatives in clarifying the ‘customer's request and in monitoring the laboratory's performance in relation to the ‘work performed. Such cooperation includes (with prior intimation & approval): 7.17 | providing reasonable access to relevant areas ofthe laboratory to witness ccustomer-specific laboratory activities; b preparation, packaging, and dispatch of items needed by the customer for verification purposes. Presently no case has been evident. Records of reviews, including any significant changes, are relained. Presently no case 71g | has been evident. Records of pertinent discussions with a customer relating to the | customer's requirements or the results of the laboratory activities are retained. Ref. Email/WO confirmation 7.2 | Selection, verification and validation of methodsa ‘Selection, verification of methods 7.2.1.1 The laboratory uses appropriate methods and procedures for all laboratory activities and, where appropriate, for evaluation of the measurement uncertainty as well 8s statistical techniques for analysis of data. 7.2.1.2. All methods, procedures and supporting documentation, such as instructions, standards, manuals and reference data relevant to the laboratory activities, are kept up t0 date and made readily available to personnel. 7.2.1.3 The laboratory ensures that it uses the latest valid version of a method unless it isnot appropriate or possible to do so. When necessary, the application of the method shall be supplemented with additional details to ensure consistent application 7.2.1.4 When the customer does not specify the method to be used, the laboratory selects an appropriate method (as per scope) and inform the customer of the method chosen. Methods published either in international, regional or national standards, or by teputable technical organizations, or in relevant scientific texts or journals, or as specified by the manufacturer of the equipment, are recommended. Laboratory: | developed or modified methods can also be used. 7.2.1.5 The laboratory verifies that it can properly perform methods before introducing ‘them by ensuring that it can achieve the required performance. Records of the ‘Verification are retained. If the method is revised by the issuing body, verification is repeated to the extent necessary. 7.2.1.6 When method development is required, this shall be a planned activity and shall bbe assigned to competent personnel equipped with adequate resources, As method development proceeds, periodie review shall be carried out to confirm that the needs of the customer are still being fulfilled. Any modifications to the development plan shall be approved and authorized. Not applicable 7.2.1.7 Deviations from methods for all laboratory activities will occur only if the deviation has been documented, technically justified, authorized, and accepted by the customer. Customer acceptance of deviations can be agreed in advance in the contract. Ref. FRTRR Itis evident that laboratory uses only standard method for the testing hence no validation of method is required. List of IS method used for testing is evident as in FR/LEOD | Validation of methods As lab uses 1S standard, validation of method is not applicable. Lab does not is exclusion to lab,14 Taal | Handling oftest item 742 Handling of test item ‘The laboratory has established a procedure for transport, receipt, handling, protection (QSP Procedure No. 10, storage, retention and disposai of test item. TT Upon receipt of the sample the lab provide the identification no. to the test item received for testing, the identification remains on it tll the life of sample in the lab Sample acceptance eriterion as per applicable IS standard not defined and documented. ‘The same is recorded in sample receipt register FR/SRR. Lab recorded the various deviation observed upon receipt of the sample. IFit is ‘acceptable then only the testing is carried out, if the deviation may exist its effect on testing then the lab retused to accept the sample and informed the customer immediately. 744 Lab has stored its sample in room under lock and key with proper authorization, as no extra precaution are required. Technical Records 751 ‘The laboratory ensures that technical records for each laboratory activity contain the results, report and sufficient information to facilitate, if possible, identification of factors affecting the measurement result and its associated measurement uncertainty and {enable the repetition of the laboratory activity under conditions as close as possible to the original. The technical records includes the date and the identity of personnel responsible for each laboratory activity and for checking data and results. Original observations, data and caleulations are recorded at the time th identifiable with the specific task, Laboratory maintains the various technical record with date and the person responsible for the performing of that activity is evident Fg Sample Receipt Register, sample Isne Register, lob Register, Test Report ete ey are made-and shall he 182 The laboratory ensures that amendments to technical records can be tacked to previous versions or to original observations, Both the original and amended data and files are retained, including the date of alteration, an indication of the altered aspects and the personnel responsible for the alterations Presently no case has been evident16 Evaluation of measurement of uncertainty 761 Laboratories identified the contributions to measurement uncertainty. When evaluating ‘measurement uncertainty all contributions that ae of significance, including those arising from sampling, is taken into account using appropriate methods of analysis Laboratory has established a procedure for measurement of uncertainty calculations as QSP/MU. | Lab has also calculated measurement of uncertainty forall the parameters. The calculation is done and the details is evident in Measurement Uncertainty register “Measurement uncertainty for parameter considering the contributors like accuracy of instrument not evident NCR A laboratory performing calibrations, including of its own equipment, shall evaluate the ‘measurement uncertainty for al calibrations: Not applicable A laboratory performing testing evaluates measurement uncertainty. Where the test ‘method precludes rigorous evaluation of measurement uncertainty, an estimation is ‘made based on an understanding of the theoretical principles or practical experience of the performance of the method. Ensuring the validity of results‘The laboratory have a procedure for monitoring the validity of results. The laboratory has established the procedure (No.12) for Quality assurance to ensure the validity to ensure the results as QSP/EVR. ‘The resulting data is recorded in such a way that trends are detectable and, where practicable, statistical techniques is applied to review the results. This monitoring is planned and reviewed (FR/QAP & FRIQARP tis evident that lab has carried out various activities to ensue the validity ofits results such as; 8) Use of reference material or quality control materials ( Not applicable), b) Use of alternative instrumentation that has been calibrated to provide traceable results (As applicable) ©) Functional checks of measuring and testing equipment- carried out from OEM or technical experts vn 4) —_Useof check or working standards with control chart, where Loe applicable (Not applicable, are ©) Intermediate checks on measuring equipment through the OEM or | validity of oe ee eplicatetests using the same or different methods (Not applicable) 8) Retesting of retained items. 4) Comelation of results for different characteristics ofan item. (Not applicable). ') Review of reported results- carried out by Lab Head. i) Intra-laboratory comparison 4) Testing biind sample.(Not applicable) Ref. 1 Quality Assurance File. 2. Intermediate Check plan & Record 3. Job register with verification by TM Quality Assurance activities as per plan to be ensured eg, Retained sample testing, Intra Lab comparison Ttis evident thatthe results of all the quality assurance activity(Comparative result: Lab & Customer/Site) are within the acceptable range J NCR772 Lab has plan for four year for ILC and Proficiency Testing as Form 16. As per plan lab participate in ILC and PT programs. It is evident that the results are within the acceptable range. a PT: Global PT: Z score: 1.36 Acceptable b. ILC:TTL-VPES, Unit Testing, RL-PWD, Precision Dt. Of testing: 19.04.2022, Z-seore:-0.69 The data received from various quality control activities are monitored, analysed and used for further improvements. Tf the results of the analysis of data from monitoring activities are found to be outside pre-defined criteria, appropriate action are taken to prevent incorrect results from being reported Results are within acceptable criterion hence no action is required. 78 /Reporting of results, a7. 78ILT The results are reviewed and authorized prior to release. Ref Tob Register & Hest Report 78112 The results are provided accurately, clearly, unambiguously and objectively, usually ina report (eg. atest report ora calibration certificate or report of sampling), and shall include all the information agreed with the customer and necessary for the ‘nlerpretation ofthe results and ail information required by the method used. All issued reports are retained as technical records. 781.3 When agreed with the customer, the results may be reported ina simplified ‘way. Any information listed in 7.8.2 to 7.8.7 that is not reported to the customer is readily availabie78.2.1 7.82.1 Each report includes atleast the following information, unless the laboratory hha valid reasons for not doing so, thereby minimizing any possibility of misunderstanding or misuse | & _atitle (eg, “Test Report” or “Calibration Certificate” or “Report of Sampling”), b thename and address of the laboratory; © the location of performance of the laboratory activities, including when performed at a customer facility or at sites away from the laboratory's permanent facilities, or in associated temporary or mobile facilities; d ‘unique identification that all its components are recognized as a portion ‘of a complete report and a clear identification of the end; e ‘the name and contact information of the customer; f identification of the method used; 8 a description, unambiguous identification, and, when necessary the condition ofthe item; h the date of receipt of the test or calibration item(s), and the date of sampling, where this is critical to the validity and application of the results; ithe date(s) of performance of the laboratory activity; J the date of issue of the report, k reference to the sampling plan and sampling method used by the laboratory or other bodies where these are relevant to the validity or application of the results; 1 astatement to the effect that the results relate only to the items tested, calibrated or sampled; m the results with, where appropriate, the units of measurement; additions to, deviations, or exclusions from the method, © identification of the person(s) authorizing the report; P___clear identification when results are from extemal providers. ‘The lab has established a test report for releasing their results. The test report FR/TR are fullfilled all the requirements of 7.8.2. are evident. Lab has unique no, on test report as er NABL guidelines. The reports are released with proper authorization Test report as per the ISO 17025:2017 requirement- Codification, SI unit system, Applicable IS std. evident. Lab does not provide any opinions and interpretation on results provided Ref: Test Report No. Dt. 19.04.2022. Test report as per the ISO 17025-2017 & applicable IS $16:2021 requirement- Unique ‘Test Report numbering, Observation not evident. NCR7822 ‘The laboratory is responsible for all the information provided in the report, except when information is provided by the customer. Data provided by a customer shall be clearly identified. In addition, a disclaimer is put on the report, when the information is supplied by the customer and can affect the validity of results. Where the laboratory has ‘not been responsible for the sampling stage (e.g. the sample has been provided by the custome) it states in the report that the results apy to the sample as received Specific requirements for test reports 7.8.3.1 In addition to the requirements listed in 7.82, test reports , where necessary for | the interpretation of the test results, includes the following: @ information on specific test conditions, such as. environmental conditions, b where relevant, a statement of conformity with requirements or specifications (see 7.8.6), © where applicable, the measurement uncertainty presented in the same ‘unit as that of the measurand or ina term relative to the measurand (e.g. percent) when ~ itis relevant to the validity or application of the test results; ~ customer's instruction so requires, or ~ the measurement uncertainty affects conformity to a specification limit, 4 where appropriate, opinions and interpretations (see 7.8.7); © additional information that may be required by specific methods, authorities, customers or groups of customers. 7.83.2 Where the laboratory is responsible for the sampling activity, test reports meets ‘the requirements listed in 7.8.5 where necessary for the interpretation of test results. Ref. Test Report FR/TR 184 Specific requirements for calibration certificates: Not apy 785 Reporting sampling - specific requirements: Not applicableReporting statements of conformity 7.8.6.1 When a statement of conformity to a specification or standard is provided, the laboratory documents the decision rule employed, taking into account the level of risk (such as false accept and false reject and statistical assumptions) associated with the decision rule employed, and apply the decision rule, 786 | 78.6.2 The laboratory reports on the statement of conformity, such that the statement clearly identifies: 2 to which results the statement of conformity applies; b Which specifications, standards or parts thereof are met or not met; © the decision rule applied (unless it is inherent in the requested | specification or standard), Ref. Test Report FR/TR , Decision Rule 7-87 | Reporting opinions and interpretations: Not applicable Amendments to reports 788.1 When an issued report needs to be changed, amended or re-issued, any change of information are clearly identified and, where appropriate, the reason for the change included in the report 7882 Amendments to a report after issue are made only in the form of a further 788 | document, or data transfer, which includes the statement “Amendment to Report, serial ‘number... for as otherwise identfied]”, or an equivalent form of wording. Such ‘amendments meet all the standard requirements 7883 When itis necessary to issue a complete new repor, this shall be uniquely ‘dentified and shall contain a reference tothe original that it replaces, Presently no case is evident.79 ‘Complaint 7.9.1 The laboratory have a documented process to receive, evaluate and make decisions on complaints. | The laboratory has established a procedure for complaint received in the lab as spice, 7.92 A description of the handling process for complaints is available to any interested party on request. Upon receipt of a complaint, the laboratory shall confirm ‘whether the complaint relates to laboratory activities that it is responsible for and, if so, shall deal with it. The laboratory shall be responsible for all decisions at all levels of the handling process for complaints 7.93. The process for handling complaints included at least the following elements | and methods: @ description of the process for receiving, validating, investigating the complaint, and deciding what actions are to be taken in response to it; b tracking and recording complaints, including actions undertaken to resolve them; © ensuring that any appropriate action is taken 794 The laboratory receiving the complaint is responsible for gathering and verifying all necessary information to validate the complaint. 793 Whenever possible, the laboratory acknowledges receipt ofthe complaint, and Provide the complainant with progress reports and the outcome. 796 The outcomes to be communicated to the complainant is made by, or reviewed and approved by, individual(s) not involved in the original laboratory activities in question, 79.7 Whenever possible, the laboratory gives formal notice of the end of the complaint handling to the complainant. Ref: The complaint is register (FR/CC) in complaint register day basis. No customer Complaint is evident till date. No complaint is recorded7.10 ‘Non Conformity 7.10.1 The laboratory have a procedure that gets implemented when any aspect of its laboratory activities or results ofthis work do not conform to its own procedures or the | agreed requirements of the customer (e.g. equipment or environmental conditions are ‘out of specified limits, results of monitoring fail to meet specified criteria). The procedure shall ensure that @ the responsibilities and authorities for the management of nonconforming work are defined; b actions (including halting or repeating of work and withholding of reports, as necessary) are based upon the risk levels established by the laboratory; © anevaluation is made of the significance of the nonconforming, work, including an impact analysis on previous results, 4 adecision is taken on the acceptability of the nonconforming work; © where necessary, the customer is notified and work is recalled; f the responsibility for authorizing the resumption of work is defined, 7.10.2 ‘The laboratory retains records of nonconforming work and actions as specified in 7.10.1, bullets b) tof) 7.10.3 Where the evaluation indicates that the nonconforming work could recur, oF that there is doubt about the conformity of the laboratory's operations with its own ‘management system, the laboratory shall implement corrective action. Procedure for control of non-conforming work is evident as QSP/NCW. It is evident that the non-conformity related to technical requirement is handled by Technical ‘manager and non-conformity related to management requirement handled by Quality Manager. Lab Director/TM Lab is responsible for resumption of the work. Ref.: FR/CAPA for Calibration of Thermometer7.11.1 The laboratory have access to the data and information needed to perform laboratory activities. 7.11.2 The laboratory information management system(s) used for the collection, Processing, recording, reporting, storage or retrieval of data is validated for functionality, including the proper functioning of interfaces within the laboratory | information management system(s) by the laboratory before introduction, Whenever there are any changes, including laboratory software configuration or modifications to commercial off the-shelf software, they shall be authorized, documented and validated before implementation 7.11.3. The laboratory information management system(s) is | @ be protected from unauthorized access; b be safeguarded against tampering and loss; 7a © beoperated in an environment that complies with provider or laboratory | Control on | specifications or, in the case of noncomputerized systems, provides conditions which data and | safeguard the accuracy of manual recording and transcription; informatio 4 be maintained in a manner that ensures the integrity of the data and n | information; manageme © include recording system failures and the appropriate immediate and ntsystem | corrective actions | 7-114 When a laboratory information management system is managed and maintained off-site or through an external Provider, the laboratory ensures that the Provider or ‘operator of the system complies with all applicable requirements of this document. | 7.115. The laboratory ensures that instructions, manuals and reference data relevant to | | the laboratory information management system(s) are made readily available to Personnel 7.11.6 Calculations and data transfers is checked in an appropriate and systematic ‘manner. | ‘The laboratory has established @ procedure for lab information management QSP/LIS. | Laboratory has authorized person for handling data. FR/AL | Caleulations done on ‘computers are systematically transferred and checked Prior to release the report. Ref. Job Register, Test Report by TM 8 | Management System RequirementsS11 | Managem ent | Laboratory has established, documented, implemented and maintained the management System | system in accordance with ISO 17025-2017. document ation [expose | ent Laboratory has established, documented, implemented and maintained the management | 8.12 _ | system in accordance with ISO 17025:2017 as the laboratory is not certified for ISO 9001 and thus Option A is applicable which is being followed. i A laboratory that has established and maintains a management system, in accordance | 3.13 _ | With the requirements of ISO 9001, and that is capable of supporting and demonstrating | the consistent fulfilment of the requirements of Clauses 4 to 7, also fulfils at least the intent of the management system requirements specified in 8.2 to 8.9.: Not applicable 82 | Management system documentation | S27 | Managem | The laboratory has developed quality policy which is available m quality manual, | ent system | Quality objective is also defined which is in line with quality policy. The same is displayed at prominent location to make staff aware of laboratory policy and objectives. |} 822 The established quality policy and objective address the competency, impartiality and consistent operation of the laboratory 823 ‘Top management involvement is evident for the development and implementation of the quality management system in the laboratory, All documentation, processes, systems, records, related to the fulfillment of the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 are included in, referenced from, of linked to the ‘management system. | ‘The documentation structure of Laboratory is as follows: - 8.24 | Quality manual-level I document | P2825 Quality System Procedure-Level -II document. it Quality Test Procedure-Level-III document & Forms and formats-Level-1V documents are evident. Documents developed for the management system is access to all the lab personnel. The document distribution list is evident. 83 | Control of management system documents{8317 Document Control To established control on all the documents prepared by the lab as per ISO 17025:2017, laboratory has established a Procedure for document data control_as QSP/DDC. 832 '@ Laboratory has prepared a mechanism for preparation , review, approval and distribution of documents. TM/QM prepares and issues the documents, while lab director approves the documents is evident. Quality policy and Quality objectives are prepared by the quality manager and approved by lab Director (Dr. RU Sambhe) while quality manager distribute it ». It is evident that laboratory review its document every years through FR/DRR. ¢ Latest copy of master list of document FR/MLD is evident to show the current revision status of the lab documents. Latest version of IS standard is used by the lab for testing, the same is evident. Example: IS 516:2021 is available. «¢ Laboratory has established a unique system for giving a proper document no. for ‘example, Records are identified as FR/ Abbreviation, £ Separate file for obsolete documents are evident. 84/ | Control of record 84.1 The Taboratory established and retained legible records to demonstrate fulfilment of the requirements in this document. 842 The laboratory implemented the controls needed for the identification, storage, protection, back-up, archive, retrieval, retention time, and disposal of its records. The laboratory retains records for a period consistent with its contractual obligations, Access to these records shall be consistent with the confidentiality commitments, and records shall be readily available. Ref: Procedure for control of records is developed (QSP/CQR) is evident to ensure the ‘various control needed such as identification, storage, protection ete, Master list of records (FR/MLR) is evident.8.5/ Risk | | Analysis | 8.5.1 The laboratory has considered the risks and opportunities associated with the laboratory activities in order to a ‘give assurance that the management system achieves its intended results; b enhance opportunities to achieve the purpose and objectives of the laboratory; e Prevent, or reduce, undesired impacts and potential failures in the laboratory activities; | d ‘achieve improvement. 852 The laboratory has planned: @ actions to address these risks and opportunities; b Howto: ~ integrate and implement the sections into its management system; = evaluate the effectiveness ofthe sections 853 Actions taken to address risks and opportunities are proportional to the potential impact on the validity of laboratory results. Ref. Laboratory has established the procedure (No. 18) for risk analysis QSP/RAC. Also lab hhas developed the risk analysis forall its laboratory activities including impartiality and confidentiality(FR/RAC), Lab has also established various opportunities for improvement for various risk identified, 8.6.1 Lab has also established various opportunities for improvement for various risk ~ identified 8.6.2 For the improvement of laboratory activities lab seek feedback from its customer on regular basis. The feedback shall be analysed and used to improve the management system, laboratory activities and customer service. Customer feed back form is evident However, Customer Feedback system not established yet. NCR87.1 When anonconformity occurs, the laboratory: 2 reacted to the nonconformity and, as applicable, = take action to control and correct it; address the consequences; b evaluated the need for action to eliminate the cause(s) of the ‘nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere, by - reviewing and analysing the nonconformity, - determining the causes of the nonconformity, - determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur, implements any action needed; review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken; © updates risks and opportunities determined during planning, if necessary; £ makes changes to the management system, if necessary 87.2 Corrective actions are appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities ‘encountered 8.7.3 The laboratory retains records as evidence of: & the nature of the nonconformities, cause(s) and any subsequent actions taken: b the results of any corrective action, Ref Laboratory has established procedure for corrective action as QSP/CA. itis evident that |ab has taken all the efforts to closed all the non conformities raised during audit process by taking appropriate corrective action Risk Analysis & Control FR/RAC| Internal | Angi 88.1 The laboratory has conducted internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the management system: a conforms to = the laboratory's own requirements for its management system, including the laboratory activities; ~ the requirements of this document; bis effectively implemented and maintained 882 The laboratory has: a planed, established, implemented and maintained an audit programme including the frequency, methods, responsibilities, planning requirements and reporting, which shall take into consideration the importance of the laboratory activities concemed, changes affecting the laboratory, and the results of previous audits; b defined the audit criteria and scope for each audit; © ensured that the results of the audits are reported to relevant ‘management; 4 implemented appropriate correction and corrective actions without undue delay, © retained records as evidence of the implementation of the audit Programme and the audit results. Ref. ‘The Procedure for Internal Audit is QSP/IA evident. The internal audit is carried out ‘once in a six month as per Intemal Audit Calendar (FR/IAC), Internal audit schedule evident.8.9.1 The laboratory management has reviewed its management system at planned intervals, in order to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness, including the stated policies and objectives related tothe fulfilment of this document. 892 The inputs to management review are recorded and include information related | to the following, @ changes in internal and external issues that are relevant to the laboratory; b fulfilment of objectives; suitability of policies and procedures, status of actions from previous management reviews; ‘outcome of recent internal audits, corrective actions; assessments by extemal bodies; hh changes in the volume and type of the work or inthe range of Shoe ia laboratory activities; | so i ‘customer and personnel feedback, | Managem j ‘complaints; | ew k ‘effectiveness of any implemented improvements; Reviews | 1 adequacy of resources, | m results of risk identification; | no ‘outcomes of the assurance of the validity of results; and | © other relevant factors, such as monitoring activites and training, 8.9.3 The outputs from the management review are recorded all decisions and actions related to at least: a the effectiveness of the management ‘system and its processes; b improvement of the laboratory activities related to the fulfilment of the requirements of this document; | © provision of required resources; | d any need for change. Ref: Frequency for Management Review ‘meeting : twice in a year. Circular for MRM ‘Dt...28.04.2022 evident. The: ‘management committee is formed as FR/MC. Lab director is the chairperson of the meeting is evident. Date 24.11.23 Name Rejev Bhave‘TIL-VPESFRINCR, lew: 01/0, se Dt: 1582022 Transformer Testing Laboratory, Vishvas Power Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:z- 01 NCRNo: OL Date 21.11.2022 Aativity Audited Reference Documenis ‘Clause NOG Customer satisfaction 18017025:2017 a Non-conformances due to Customer feedback (gathering) system not established as per laid procedure. Be sioue: SOP Autor Audiee Signature a B /Rosemsembss: Lace of, Aumnenons abud £60 1702622017 Signature of Auditee:— s © Censcine Raion BORK mmedsale oamechon © Go SAN ESAIS fo Ce ofened Predtnbie Grrectin — Vrauung on $6 1702+ 2017 Person responsible for coretive action ene Date by which corecive ation wil be implemented: —-2LLL2.3._.. Signet Anite: SRY _ D_| Veriiation of Conecive aon proposal We Autor: ——— Date: 91.1123 5 retinas Fa a WS pee Hag cutis ang’ semnae REYTTL-VPESIFRANCR,IssfRev no: 01/00, sue Dae: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo.: 02 Date21.11.2022 ‘Activity Audited: Reference Documents: Clause No.7. ‘Test Report 18017025:2017 A” | Non-conformances due to Test report as per the ISO 17025:2017 & applicable IS requirement- Unique Test Report numbering, Observation not evident Auditor : —— Te Signature ULE Signature 5 [Rootcmmomabi Lack of Aumengo al ip (feed adel Signature of Auditee : ———- C | Corrective Action proposed: nme jake cunechin ~ Test Raat formot to Re mrt onfepmn, bh Be toes Lang om comrectia 5 Training ie to. 17025 Person responsible or comective ation = $ThMon Oe 2017 Date by which corrective action will be implemented: 21-123 senna ete SOME _ 1D | Verification of Corrective action proposed: Dawe: 21))23, E | Verification & closure by Quality Manager ow AL reed2 TTL-VPESIFRINCR,ls/Rev no: OV00, sue Date: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCR No.: 03 Date21.11.2022 Activity Audited: ™ Reference Documents: ‘Clause No.7.6, Measurement Uncertainty 180170252017 7 _] Non-conformances due to Measurement uncertainty for parameter considering the contributors like accuracy of machine not evident, ee _ ee eee SR Auditee : Signatur :———————- B | Rootease analysis: Yack of Aworenn afeat iso 1102$ 207 Signature of Auditee:-——— © | Coneive Acion reread: Ca — Mu eakakalim tw Re Ade PA — Training > Omducted * to 1702 $ : 20/4. Person responsible for corrective action: — ea.. Date by which coretve action wil be implemented: —2L)J)22___ Sern alee: SELL D_ | Vetificaion of Corrective action proposed ste = aie: E.LLI25 Verification & closure by Quality Manager ete ELL uaity Managers signature heTIL-VPES/FRUNCR, Is/Rev no 01/00, Issue Dts 18 082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo.: 04 Date21.11.2022 Activity Audited: Reference Documents: Clause No74 Test Item handling 1S017025:2017 ‘A Not-conformances due to ‘Sample acceptance criterion as per applicable IS standard not defined and documented. Signature Auditor : Auitee : 8 [Recteamemar sacle Ole Atiainvoa lau) ip 1702550 6RE Signature of Auditee :— © [Sones rome: CR - Compe Gccepfunce biting made Person responsible for corrective action : —- Date by which corrective action will be implemented! Signature of Auditee : ~~ D__| Verification of Corrective action proposed: dy Auditor: —— Date: — E | Verification & closure by Quality. Manager Quality Manager's signature :TTL-VPESIFRINCR,ls/Rev no: O100, sue Date: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo.: 05 Date21.11.2022 ‘Activity Audited: Reference Documents Clause No.62 Competency Evaluation 18017025:2017 ‘A | Non-conformances due to Competency Evaluation of the personnel as per ISO 17025:2017 requirement not evident ee al Auditee : Signature Signature Bu Pos oeicmibys == le Roe yg ae about (Se (je2s:26q Signature of Auditee Get S| Sars etre nwt Senne A NaC ORE Competeney o} cutee mun trong, febuteal Pape oy Se nag, AMON Raper oe f < : nin Person responsible for corrective action : ———~ sl a B20 (SSO ear eaey. Date by which corectve action wil be implemented 319% Sionature of Auditee Ord D_ | Verification of Corrective action proposed Auditor: —- due: LIL1b2 E_| Verification & closure by Qualiy” Manager Dae: ISL Jog Quality Manager's soue BITIL-VPESFRINCR,Is/Rev no: 0100 sme Date: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo: 06 Date21.11.2022 Activity Audited Reference Documents ‘Clause No.6 Lab safety 18017025:2017 ‘A | Non-conformances dus to Lab safety and infrastructural inspection, Provision of safety resources like PPEs, First Aid Box, fire Extinguisher not evident. Electrical inspection of lab to be carried out Provision of AC to software-based system not evident Auditor : = Signature Audit mn Signature Bos Romemenamalnts 5) Fee KOS} operas AVES: ASS FSF 26 Signi ot anit: AS © | Coneive Acton pope FA x= pur chow Tmamidads Bakery VOHvuwrcen ' LB, qroniwey on Satety Pen mpm tama ain Aiken Fed Date by which conective action willbe implemented: 2°L 4.1.25. Signature of Auditee : D | Verification of Corrective action proposed: Dae: 2211.22. Quality Manager's signature Lu‘TTL-VPESIFRINCR,Is/Rev no: O10, Isue Date: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo.: 07 Date21.11.2022 ae ee Docs | Clause No.64 ‘A | Non-conformances due to Equipments are not Jabeled as per ISO 17025 standard requirements. Auditor : ——- Signature : ~ Auditee : Signature B [Rootcause analysis: Zack OF Resmnom ohouk (S© (sis asp sino atin: I © | Conceive Action proposed: Tenpedsake Debio. epan eqpmeD, labeled & (Aix Wb eu equip med] tems ebm cere aes Cosel eps: Date by which corrective action willbe implemented: 3.1.12. Signature of Auditee ig D | Vesicaton af Conectve aon propos hea ee. Date: 2.12092, E | Verification & closure by Qualiiy Manager Silla uty ages AS?TTL-VPESFRINCR, ls/Rev no: 0/00, sue Dt: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHV AS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo.: 08 Date21.11.2022 Activity Audited: Reference Documents: Clause No.6.5 Equipment Traceability 18017025:2017 ‘A | Nomconformances due to Metrological traceability certificates of Calibration certificated of AIMIL needs to be ensured as per dard. NABL/ISO 17034 Auditor: Signature ee site: Gp — B [Rootcawsemnalysis” Tqcle a] Ausorners obeuk 1s5 Wsarzery Senet anton NS © | Comective Action proposed: —Srmm diate [eRe t+ -bali< Yo Catibradou Agency b Collect tro catetohly Coytjcake Pacon repent coecive cin Creve, Pate Date by which corrective action will be implemented: 2224112. Siem of Andie: Cpa — D_| Verification of Corrective action proposed: ae Auditor: ~~ Date -21-11..2.2 E | Verification & closure by Quality Manager ae: Bella coy angers sige SSM‘TIL-VPESIFRINCR,Is/Rev no: O10, Ise Dat: 1.082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo: 9 Date21.11.2022 ‘Activity Audited Reference Documents: Clause No62 Training effectiveness 180170252017 | ‘A | Nom-conformances due to ‘Training: Effectiveness evaluation record not evident. Ref. Technica! training on IS Standards Auditor = Signature : ~ Siguturn <= Cees Auditee : — B | Rootcaseanabsis: Jack e} Resernen Abeuk [so Meas Oath Simard cege Ce © | Commstve Aston wopamed: = (V"- Conduck echnical hang OW IS Stecderd,, Person esponsbe for comectve action: NY 30 Blog ua Date by which corrective action wl be implemented vv Signature of Auditee : ~~ D_| Verification of Corrective action proposed: ee Bee E | Verification & closure by Quality ManagerTTL-VPESIFRINCR,Is/Rev o: O10, sue Date: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNoz 10 Date21.11.2022 aay Aurcs sorws2007 | ee ‘A | Non-conformances due to Quality Assurance activities as per plan to be ensured. Eg, Intra lab testing, Retained sample testing etc (for applicable parameters). he ae Auditee : — Signature : —-{ B [Rootemmemnalvis: Taig OF Aevernem About (So (12S a7 sigutwect Aste: APS —_ © | Coneetve Acton proposed: Tmmedlak Ach i- Conduck ILC ¥ Cokcalake Z- Scyx. Loay tem bche. trantun on MO 2: See Person responsible for corrective action Biren, eae Date by which corrective action will be implemented: -=————-—-— Square nay ea D_| Verification of Corrective action proposed: Auto de Date :2b-N.22- E_ | Verification & closure by Quality Manager ron ay Date: ZL.23:2023 Quality Manager's signatureTTL-VPESIPRUNCR,I/Rev no: OVC, sue Date: 15082022 TRANSFORMER TESTING LABORATORY, VISHVAS POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT AUDIT NO:- 01 NCRNo: 11 Date21.11.2022 Activity Audited: Reference Documents ‘Clause No.4. 1/42 Impartiality Confidentiality 18017025:2017 ‘A | Non-conformances due to Auditor : ——. Auditee : ——- Declaration of Impapiality & Confidentiality of staff not evident in HR File. B [Rooeanemains: Tack SY —Rawernon obak 188 east Signature of Auditee : | Coneane haan popaaTT | pada ATR Sn. decdavaha, A ae Suath ob & pledge pooRreien Prepon Person responsible for corrective action @s:Sbeega Bho Date by which corrective action will be implemented Signature of Auditeg :————————-—-— D__| Verification of Corrective action proposed ‘Auditor: ase a E | Verification & closure by Quality Manager