Scribd
Upload
199 views1 page

Load Flow Comparison: ETAP vs Digsilent

The document compares the load flow results between ETAP and Digsilent software. It shows that the total lump load modeled in Digsilent was 4.88 MW, while the static load modeled in ETAP was 2.38 MW. It also breaks down the motor loads between the two software, showing that the total motor load modeled in Digsilent was 7.51 MW and in ETAP was 7.50 MW, demonstrating good agreement between the two simulations.

Uploaded by

UTSHAB GHOSH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
199 views1 page

Load Flow Comparison: ETAP vs Digsilent

The document compares the load flow results between ETAP and Digsilent software. It shows that the total lump load modeled in Digsilent was 4.88 MW, while the static load modeled in ETAP was 2.38 MW. It also breaks down the motor loads between the two software, showing that the total motor load modeled in Digsilent was 7.51 MW and in ETAP was 7.50 MW, demonstrating good agreement between the two simulations.

Uploaded by

UTSHAB GHOSH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

suriya-kumar S

Load flow result comparison ETAP Vs Digsilent

Total lump load in the Digsilent 4.88 MW


Static load in the ETAP 2.38 MW
Motor load from Lump load in digsilent 2.51 MW
Motor load modelled as a motor 5.00 MW
Total Motor load from Digsilent 7.51 MW
Total Motor load in ETAP 7.50 MW

Load P(U) in the digsilent report taking the overall load (i.e - Total Lump load there is no differenciation between the Constant KVA and Constant I)

You might also like