Trustees and Canon Law PDF
Trustees and Canon Law PDF
CANON LAW
An Increasingly Lay Leadership in Catholic Health
Care Must Remember Its Responsibilities to the Church
S
ome 17 years ago, shortly after the 1983 comes from years of involvement in Catholic
Code of Canon Law was promulgated, health care. Even those who are familiar with BY FR. FRANCIS G.
CHA asked me to prepare a brief study church teachings need to keep updated. For MORRISEY, OMI, JCD,
of the administration of ecclesiastical instance. Pope John Paul IPs August 29, 2000, PhD
goods; the resulting article, "Canonical address on cloning and t r a n s p l a n t s t o the
Duties, Liabilities of Trustees and Admini- International Congress on Transplants provided
strators," appeared in Health Progress in 1985.' the church's position regarding those issues an
Although many of the points made in that article update that has not yet appeared in textbooks. 2
remain valid today, some do not because, in the The recent announcement of human cloning
intervening years, the canons have been applied raises further questions for which we do not yet
and interpreted so as to adapt the law to new sit- have all—or perhaps any—of the answers.5 Although
uations. 1 would, therefore, like to address a these issues do not relate directly to canon law, they
number of the newer issues, especially those that do have serious implications for the continuing
apply to members of boards of trustees, who Catholic identity of our health care institutions.
must make decisions affecting the future of the Because of the close relationship between
health care apostolatc. In canonical literature, Fr. Morrisey is on
"members" of the corporation and "trustees," I
such persons are usually referred to as "canonical the faculty of canon
will be using the terms interchangeably, although
stewards." In this article, I will limit my remarks law, Saint Paul
I recognize that in many instances a clear distinc-
to the temporal dimension of the trustee's role, University Ottawa,
tion is made between the two levels of involve-
leaving the spiritual dimension, which is equally Ontario. This arti-
ment, particularly concerning canonical sponsors
important, for another occasion. cle is based on a
and civil trustees, but also in the secular sphere,
presentation he
In his first letter to the Corinthians, St. Paul where we have multitiered structures. Different
made to the (.'anon
reminds his listeners that they are to be regarded as systems assign responsibilities to one level or the
Law forum in
Christ's subordinates and as stewards of the secrets other; there is no hard and last rule concerning
Tampa, FL, in
of God. Stewards arc expected to show themselves which responsibility is exercised at a particular
April 2001.
trustworthy, he says (1 Cor 4:2). The call to be level. What counts most is that the duties be
trustworthy is fundamental to any type of steward faithfully carried out, whether by the "members"
ship, spiritual or temporal. We can therefore ask or by the "trustees" who serve on the board.
ourselves, "What is an attitude of 'trustworthy Although we don't find the word "trustee" in the
stewardship' as it affects the administration of tem- Code, we do find a number of other expressions,
poral goods belonging to the church or to one of such as "steward," "administrator," and "council
its juridic persons or recognized entities:" member," which give us sufficient insight into
Many persons are selected for board member- what is expected of a "trustee." Similarly, because
ship or stewardship positions, not because of their we deal more frequently today with health care
know ledge of Catholic teachings .\nd laws, but systems than with single institutions, I will refer
rather because of their esteemed places in the more directly to systems. What applies to the
community and their expressed interest in a par- whole can also be applied to the parts, with the
ticular apostolic undertaking. It would not be fair appropriate adaptations.
to expect such people to have, at the time of their In a recent Health Progress article, I traced the
appointment, the knowledge and experience that development of various structures used in con-
merits or statutes governing the institution >\\u\ san regulations and policies relating to apostolic
its sponsors. activities carried out in the diocese, and the laws
This duty implies six elements, three of which w ill be those promulgated either by the Holy See
are somewhat on a philosophical or spiritual line, or some other competent legislator, such as the
whereas the other three arc on a more practical diocesan bishop.
one: In Relation to Temporal Goods My remarks concerning
• The (1) mission, (2) vision, and (3) values of canonical d o c u m e n t s and a system's mission
the system apply also to matters relating to temporal goods.
• The (4) teaching, (5) discipline, and (6) laws Trustees can either exercise both canonical and
of the Catholic Church civil responsibilities or function exclusively on a
To carry out these duties, the trustees usually single level. I will focus here on the canonical
exercise certain powers that relate directly to the obligations in this area.
philosophy and mission of the system or the insti- The goods owned by a public juridic person
tution. Sometimes these powers are reserved to are ecclesiastical goods. It will thus be important
other persons, depending on the way in which to determine precisely, in each case, whether a
the organization has been set up. For instance, in given system owns its institutions or works abso-
some systems, a sponsor's council assumes direct lutely, on one hand, or has been entrusted with
responsibility for the mission and vision and for them for administrative purposes only, on the
ensuring compliance with the applicable ethical other. Since the presumption of the law would be
and religious directives. that, in the case of public juridic persons, the
In some cases, a system's trustees also exercise goods involved are ecclesiastical goods, a public
a sponsorship role. In such instances, the trustees juridic person should, when accepting a work for
serve as canonical stewards, dealing more with sponsorship, issue a clear statement concerning
ideas than with operations, which are the respon- the canonical "ownership" of those goods. If the
sibility of the system's various officers. Thus, for g o o d s are not ecclesiastical g o o d s , then the
instance, the members of Covenant Health norms governing administration and alienation
Systems, Lexington, MA, are the members of the do not apply in the same way. For this reason, it is
civil board; they wear both the secular hat and the essential that complete and accurate inventories
sponsorship hat and carry out their responsibili- be kept, distinguishing clearly between those
ties accordingly.9 In other instances, and perhaps goods owned by a church juridic person or entity,
even more frequently today than in the past, on one hand, and those entrusted to its care by
there exists a clear distinction between the mem some other person or body, on the other (for
bers of the civil corporation and those of the instance, a municipally owned or public institu-
canonical entity that has been established to tion that the church has been asked to operate).
ensure Catholic identity.* Following this principle becomes even more
important in cases involving a freestanding entity
Of course, if the trustees are also functioning
that has no previous church relationship but now
on the secular level, then they must also observe
wishes to be sponsored or operated by a Catholic
the obligations arising from the corporate docu-
system. The mere fact of operation, or even spon-
ments. Rut, from a canonical perspective, the
sorship, does not entail that the goods by that
trustees, to exercise their responsibilities relating
very fact become ecclesiastical goods, subject to
to mission, vision, and values, must themselves
all canonical regulations governing the same.
keep abreast of the teaching, discipline, and laws
In Relation to the Diocesan Bishop All apostolic works
of the Roman Catholic Church and apply these
are under the direction of the diocesan bishop
to the best of their ability. Trustees can usually
(see c. 394, paragraph I). The way bishops de-
count on the system's mission integration depart-
cide to exercise their responsibilities will vary
ment for assistance with this. Nevertheless, they
from diocese to diocese.
have ultimate responsibility for the decisions they
make and will most likely have to arrange periodi- Whether the establishment of these forms of
cally for some form of ongoing formation in relationship with the diocesan bishop is the pre-
these three areas, possibly using the expertise of rogative of the canonical sponsors or of the
the system's members. For health care institu- trustees will depend on the way the system oper-
tions, the teachings dimension will be expressed ates. We can assume that, in cither case, the
mostly in moral and ethical matters; the disci- trustees would be part of the process. In particu-
plinary aspect can be found in the various dioce- lar, we know that the diocesan bishop should be
involved in matters relating to chaplaincy services
("care of souls" and the "liturgy") and to the
* This is the case with Catholic Health East, Hope apostolic work itself (see c. 394, and, by analog}',
Ministries, and others. C. 6 7 8 ) . Also, it is the diocesan bishop who
Catholic doctrine relating to baptism and its con- section 6); in canon law, an "investment" is a
sequences as well as an understanding of the long-term placement sufficient to make the funds
notion of apostolate and its implications for the part of the stable patrimony; it does not refer to
life of the church. A sense of mission would have ordinary banking practices.
to underlie this knowledge. This is something • To keep books in order (c. 1284, para. 2, sec-
that must be updated regularly because of new tion 7).
understandings and developments. • To prepare annual reports (c. 1284, para. 2,
Administrators of church goods at all levels are section 8); this is an exercise of accountability.
to have an attitude that may differ from that of • To keep documents secure in archives (c.
persons entrusted with the administration of sec- 1284, para. 2, section 9).
ular temporal goods. Their purpose is not pri- • To prepare annual budgets (c. 1284, para. 3).
marily to make a profit but to provide resources • To present to the faithful an account of the
for the pursuit of the church's proper ends, such use made of donations received (c. 1287, para. 2 |.
as the ordering of divine worship, providing • To secure the bishop's permission before ini-
decent support for the clergy and pastoral work- tiating or contesting law suits in secular courts (c.
ers, and performing apostolic and charitable 1288).
works, especially toward the needy (c. 1254). • To observe testamentary clauses when goods
Thus the temptation to evaluate an administra- are left to the church (c. 1300).
tor's performance simply by looking at a balance
sheet should be avoided. PARTICULAR CONCERNS IN TODAY'S WORLD
Specific Duties10 The Code lists a number of duties Several contemporary concerns should be men-
or obligations of administrators of temporal tioned here.
goods. These can be shared with the trustees. Liability Issues It is important to keep in mind
• To take an oath of office to be efficient and issues relating to responsibility. I refer here to
faithful (c. 1283, section 1). canonical liability, but the overlap with civil liabil-
• To prepare a detailed inventory of the juridic ity is evident.
person's goods (c. 1283, section 2); this would Administrators who carry out acts that are
distinguish between those goods that are owned invalid canonically, even though they might be
outright and those entrusted to the administrator valid civilly, are, according to canon 1281, para-
on behalf of another entity." graph 3, liable for such acts. Among such invalid
• To respect the intentions of donors (c. 1267, acts are selling property or contracting major
para. 3); this is a principle of natural law. debts without the proper canonical authoriza-
• To observe civil laws in matters relating to tions; using funds for purposes other than those
the hiring of personnel (and payment of salaries), for which the money was originally donated,
as well as observing the church's social teachings without authorization of the donors; not consult-
(c. 1286); usually the ethical and religious direc- ing appropriately those who have a direct interest
tives applicable in the territory refer explicitly to in the undertaking.
such matters. The juridic person is not liable in such cases
• To ensure that goods are not damaged and unless it derived benefit from the transaction. If
that appropriate insurance coverage is arranged the act is valid but illicit, how ever, the juridic per
(c. 1284, para. 2, section 1); of course, the type son is responsible. Among the latter we could
of insurance will vary according to the type of mention the sale of property or assets w ithout
work undertaken. obtaining the required canonical authorizations
• To use civilly valid methods to protect eccle- and performing acts of extraordinary administra-
siastical ownership (c. 1284, para. 2, section 2); tion without the proper canonical consents.
in North America this generally entails establish- Indeed, of all the responsibilities incumbent
ing separate corporations and carefully maintain- upon administrators, the area in which liability is
ing the distinctions between them. high is that involving the sale of property and
• To observe civil and canon law in all transac- the signing of contracts without observing the
tions (c. 1284, para. 2, section 3). proper canonical formalities (consent, for exam-
• To collect revenues (c. 1284, para. 2, section ple). If an administrator were to sell personal
4). goods (i.e., patrimony), a suit to recover dam-
• To repay debts, both capital and interest, in a ages could be introduced before the church tri-
timely manner (c. 1284, para. 2, section 5); bunals or even before civil tribunals. Such a pro-
sometimes it is preferable to retain some debt, cedure is extremely rare, however.
particularly if it is at a more favorable rate of For religious institutes, canon 639 describes a
interest. number of instances involving liability for actions.
• To invest funds securely (c. 1284, para. 2, For instance, if a juridic person that is part of a
practice. The diocesan bishop would be involved institutions "from within" because we have no
in the alienation of ecclesiastical property because consistent plan of action for the trustees.
he must express his opinion on the matter.
Third, accountability to the Apostolic See A SPECIAL GIFT
yi.m be exercised in certain ways, Tor instance, Rather than taking a somewhat negative approach
in cases of alienation of property, the permis- and considering the duties of trustees from the
sion of the Apostolic See is required if* the perspective of possible dereliction of duty, our
t r a n s a c t i o n exceeds the m a x i m u m a m o u n t ministry should approach the issue positively. As
allowed. If the trustees are also canonical stew- stewards, administrators, and trustees, such per-
ards (as in the case of some of the juridic per- sons have been entrusted with responsibility. As
sons established for health care), then they members of the people of God who are sharing in
must make a regular report to the Apostolic Christ's royal mission, they must do all they can
See, detailing: to be faithful to the trust.
• The mission A good administrator or trustee requires a spe-
• The people invoked cial gift. Those who have received such a gift
• New undertakings from the Lord should use it to build up the body
• Financial situation of Christ and to allow the church to continue its
• Relations with diocesan bishops saving mission in the world. o
FUTURE CHALLENGES
There will obviously be tensions for trustees and N O T E S
members in the years ahead. These can occur in a
number of areas. 1. Francis G. Morrisey, "Canonical Duties, Liabilities of
Trustees and Administrators." Health Progress, June
Ethical and Religious Directives One area is implemen-
1985. pp. 47-51. 70.
tation of the Ethical and Religious Directives for 2. John Paul II, "On Organ Transplants and Human
Catholic Health Care Services, in the United Cloning," The Pope Speaks, vol. 46, 2000. pp. 21-24.
States, and similar directives in other countries. See also the pope's message of July 1, 2001, to the
Implementation could be difficult in cases where Pontifical Academy, "Guidelines for Transplants of
Animal Organs to Humans," The Pope Speaks, vol.
the directives become particularly narrow, either
46. 2001. pp. 373-374.
in their wording or in their application. Trustees 3. See, for example, www.globalchange.com/
and administrators should focus strongly on the clonaid.htm, which contains many items related to
directives' positive elements, not their few nega- this relatively recent phenomenon.
tive prescriptions. 4. Francis G. Morrisey. "Toward Juridic Personality."
Health Progress, July-August 2001, pp. 27-31, 51.
Amalgamations We will inevitably see further amal- 5. See. for example. Origins. August 30, 2001. pp. 205.
gamations between Catholic health care providers 207-215, concerning the debate on stem cell
in the years ahead. For this reason, a clear guiding research.
"philosophy" is needed to govern systems and 6. See the letter of the Illinois bishops. "Facing the End
of Life." Origins. June 21. 2001. pp. 105.107-109.
their operations. For instance, questions of jus- 7. See, for example, John Paul II. "Pastoral Care of the
tice—as specified in the Ethical and Religious Sick and Imprisoned." Origins, January 24,1998. pp.
Directives—must be kept foremost in mind, even 560-561. for a number of practical principles to be
in times of serious budget constraints. Recent applied, particularly with regard to suffering as seen
groupings have put less emphasis on the particu- from a Christian perspective.
8. See B. A. Garner, ed.. Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed.,
lar charism of the original sponsoring religious West Group, St. Paul. MN. 1999. p. 1,519. for various
institute and more emphasis on a general charism definitions.
related to consecrated life .\nd the service of oth- 9. See The Canonical Statutes of Covenant Health
ers in the following of Christ. Systems, approved by the Holy See, July 15, 1995,
Article 5. See also Bob Stephens, "The Public Juridic
Will or Desire Trustees .\nd members must ask Person in Action," Health Progress. May-June 2001,
themselves whether they truly have the will or pp. 21-24, 43.
desire to carry out a mission in harmony with 10. For a practical commentary on this part of the Code,
church teachings. see R. T. Kennedy. "The Temporal Goods of the
Church," in Canon Law Society of America, New
A Possible Threat "from Within" Choosing trustees
Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, Paulist
thoughtfully, seeing to their ongoing formation, Press, New York City, 2000. pp. 1,484-1.492.
and ensuring their involvement with the teach- 11. For an excellent study of the significance of an inven-
ings of the church are essential if our various tory and the distinctions to be found in it. see D. C.
institutions are to carry out their missions. Tack Conlin, Canonical and Civil Legal Issues Surrounding
the Alienation of Catholic Health Care Facilities in
of care in doing so is probably the greatest weak
the United States, Pontifical University of St. Thomas
ness of our present ministry; if appropriate action Aquinas, Rome, 2000. pp. 57-72 ("Stable Patrimony
is not taken, we run the strong risk of losing our and the Need for an Accurate Inventory").