COMPETITIVE

INFORMATION

KOMATSU D39EX-22
VS.

John Deere 650J LT

TABLE OF CONTENTS D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Key Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Machine Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Competitive Advantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Productivity Comparison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Operator Environment Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10-22
Noise Levels – Stationary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Noise Levels – Traveling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Blade Visibility – Straight Blade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Blade Visibility – Angled Blade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Forward Visibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Ride – Cab Mounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Doors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Entry/Exit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Transmission Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Monitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Palm Command Control System (PCCS) . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Pedals. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Operator Environment Comparison Summary. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

2 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

2
TABLE OF CONTENTS D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Servicing Comparison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23-44

Cab Air Filters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Engine Oil Level Check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Engine Oil Fill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Engine Oil Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Engine Oil Drain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Fuel Pre-Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Fuel Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Fuel Fill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Coolant Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Coolant Check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Fuel Tank Drain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Coolant Drain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Engine Air Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Hydraulic Oil Level Check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Hydraulic Oil Fill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Hydraulic Oil Drain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Hydraulic Oil Filters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Batteries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Final Drive Oil Level Check & Fill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Grease Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Servicing Comparison Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

3 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

3
TABLE OF CONTENTS D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Component & Structure Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45-57

Cooling System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Hydraulic System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Blade Skin Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Hose and Cylinder Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Blade Cylinder Mounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Blade Center Pivot Ball . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Blade Castings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
C-Frame Mounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Undercarriage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Front Idler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Drive Motors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Modular Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Component & Structure Comparison Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Specification Comparison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58-61

Specification Comparison Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

4 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

4
KEY FEATURES D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Easy Operation/Increased Operator Comfort All-around Visibility

• Hydrostatic Transmission (HST) with electronic control • Super-slant nose design NET HORSEPOWER
79 kW 105 HP @ 2200 rpm
• Palm Command Control System (PCCS) • Cab-forward design
• New cab damper mounting system • Integrated ROPS/FOPS OPERATING WEIGHT
9450 kg 20,834 lb
• Large and quiet pressurized cab (optional) (level 2)

Increased Productivity Improved Durability

• Highest HP in its class • Heavy-plate steel used throughout
• Electronically-controlled hydraulically-driven fan • Dozer frame with steel casting
• Rigid track frame with in-shoe final drive • Strong modular design
• High capacity Power-Angle-Tilt dozer blade • New heavy duty HST components
• Adjustable blade pitch

Easy Maintenance
• Electronic monitor panel with on-board diagnostics
• Rear-mount radiator with swing-up electronically-
controlled hydraulically-driven fan
• Ground-level daily service checks
• KOMTRAX® level 2+

Komtrax equipped machines can send location, SMR

and operation maps to a secure website utilizing
wireless technology. Machines also relay error codes,
cautions, maintenance items, fuel levels, and much Photo may include optional equipment.
more.

5 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

The Key Features pages can be used as a walk-around. Walk-arounds are intended to assist the salesperson when they
have the opportunity to make a presentation to a customer(s) with a real machine. Walk-arounds offer the well prepared
salesperson with a great opportunity to “sell” the features and benefits of the Komatsu dozer from the machine itself.
Using these printed features and benefits, start at the left hand corner of the blade and walk around the machine,
pointing out the items that you have selected to talk about.

5
MACHINE CONFIGURATIONS D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT

Komatsu Deere
Units D39EX-22 650J LT
Operating Weight kg (lb) 9450 (20,834) 8419 (18,560)
EPA Certification Tier 3 Tier 3
Net Horsepower (kW) HP 79 (105) 74 (99)
Blade Capacity m 3 (yd3 ) 2.21 (2.89) 2.22 (2.9)
Blade Width mm (in) 2710 (107) 2667 (105)
Track On Ground mm (in) 2360 (93) 2210 (87)
Transmission Type Hydrostatic Hydrostatic
Cab or Canopy Cab Canopy

6 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

6
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Test Highlights
• Move More: During production testing, the D39EX-22 was 9.2% more productive and had 1.0% better overall efficiency
(material moved per fuel used). Deere is touting their lower fuel economy but their machine is considerably less productive
so at the end of the day the customer can get more work done with the Komatsu D39-22. If both machines were worked at
maximum load for 8 hours (not normal for this sized machine) the difference in fuel used would be less than 3 gallons!
• See More: The D39EX-22 had superior forward visibility, a 7 foot advantage, compared to the 650J LT. The unrivaled
forward visibility of the D39-22 maximizes the productivity of an operator. The D39-22 is more forgiving to new operators and
allows them to be more productive, faster. This Komatsu advantage is gained from placing the operator closer to the blade
via a mid-mount cab, incorporating a SuperSlant nose, and moving the coolers to the rear of the machine.

Demo Tips and Value Drivers

During a machine demo, make sure that the customer evaluates the following key value drivers of the D39-22. This will allow
you to demonstrate the value that is built into your product and build your customer’s confidence prior to operating the
machine.
1. Better Visibility: Have your customer adjust the seat the same on both dozers and do a quick comparison of how far the
customer can see in front of the blade using a construction cone or marking paint. State to the customer that this excellent
visibility helps operators be more productive by allowing them to adjust to changing ground conditions faster (less passes in
a day). During demos, dustier conditions are best! The Deere will kick up a large amount of dust in front of the machine,
reducing visibility. The Komatsu will blow the dust behind the machine since it has a rear mounted cooling fan.
2. Better Balance and Ride: This new machine layout, coupled with the viscous cab mounts provides a quiet and smooth
operating machine. Excellent gradeability of the D39EX-22 is the benefit for the customer.
3. Easier to Service: The Komatsu has much better access at ground level than the Deere. Point this out during a walk
around. Also, on the Komatsu D39-22 the operator does not need to crawl under the machine to change the oil. The Deere
650J requires the operator to crawl under and get dirty for that task. Now add in KOMTRAX with level 2+ functionality and
you have a valuable management tool for the owner. KOMTRAX’s integration with the machine’s onboard diagnostics allows
your service department to have a heads up on what parts or tools may be required on a service call which minimizes your
customer’s downtime. Sell this advantage!
4. More Durability: Steel castings, thick plate steel, solid one piece main frame are just a few of the items to point out
during a walkaround. Try and have your walkaround next to the Deere machine. This helps solidify your comparison in the
customer’s mind during a walkaround and helps prompt you to systematically work your way around the machine with the
customer. Deere touts their two sealed hydraulic tank system for HST and work equipment hydraulic systems. Advise the
customer the best way to avoid issues in the first place is to do all PM services per the O&M manual with Komatsu approved
filters and lubricants. The cooling system is designed to cool the oil to the proper temperature so Deere’s claims of “hotter
oil” are unfounded. The Komatsu may share the same hydraulic tank but the systems have separate high efficiency filters
and screens built in as added protection. The onboard diagnostics and KOMTRAX warn operators early of any filter
plugging issues. The KOMATSU hydraulic tank is not sealed like the Deere. It allows air to enter and exit through a new
breather filter that has 543% more filtering area than the -21A version minimizing oil contamination.

7 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

7
PRODUCTIVITY COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Productivity (English units)

In our recent testing we conducted a heavy slot dozing test to compare machine productivity and fuel consumption.
Both machines were tested in the same soil conditions and followed the same testing parameters.

100% Throttle
Item Adv.* Fuel Adv.* Fuel Adv.*
Production
Consumption Efficiency
Model (avg cu yd/hr) (avg gal/hr) (avg cu yd/gal)
Komatsu D39EX-22 256.6 9.2% 4.87 52.7 1.0%
Deere 650J LT 234.9 4.50 52.2
* Komatsu advantage over the competition

Production Fuel Consumption Fuel Efficiency

(avg cu yd/hr) (avg gal/hr) (avg cu yd/gal)
260 256.6 5.5 60 52.7
4.87 52.2
255 5.0 4.50
4.5 50
250 4.0
40
245 3.5
240 3.0 30
234.9 2.5
235 2.0 20
230 1.5
1.0 10
225 0.5
220 0.0 0
Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT

The 650J had slightly better fuel consumption as the D39 when heavy dozing at 100% throttle.
The D39EX-22 moved 9.2% more dirt in the same operating conditions. When you calculate material moved per fuel
consumed, the D39EX-22 was 1.0% more productive in this application.

8 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

8
PRODUCTIVITY COMPARISON

Productivity (Metric units)

In our recent testing we conducted a heavy slot dozing test to compare machine productivity and fuel consumption.
Both machines were tested in the same soil conditions and followed the same testing parameters.

100% Throttle
Item Adv.* Fuel Adv.* Fuel Adv.*
Production
Consumption Efficiency
Model (avg cu m/hr) (avg L/hr) (avg cu m/L)
Komatsu D39EX-22 196.2 9.2% 18.45 10.65 1.0%
Deere 650J LT 179.6 17.05 10.55
* Komatsu advantage over the competition

Production Fuel Consumption Fuel Efficiency

(avg cu m/hr) (avg L/hr) (avg cu m/L)
200 22 12 10.65 10.55
196.2
20 18.45
195 17.05 10
18
16
190 8
14
185 12 6
10
179.6
180 8 4
6
175 4 2
2
170 0 0
Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT Komatsu D39EX-22 Deere 650J LT

The 650J had slightly better fuel consumption as the D39 when heavy dozing at 100% throttle.
The D39EX-22 moved 9.2% more dirt in the same operating conditions. When you calculate material moved per fuel
consumed, the D39EX-22 was 1.0% more productive in this application.

9 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

9
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Noise Levels–Stationary
Test Conditions: High Idle, A/C off, machines not moving,
measured at 7m (23') on each side of the machine
Model Komatsu Deere
Noise Levels dB(A) D39EX-22 650J LT
Spectator, 7m (23') Left 74.6 86.1
Right 77.2 87.4
Front 72.6 86.4
Rear 74.8 82.3
Energy Average 75.1 85.9

Noise Levels dB(A)

100 86.1 87.4 86.4 82.3 85.9
90 77.2
74.6 72.6 74.8 75.1
80
70
60 Komatsu D39EX-22
50 Deere 650J LT
40
30
20
10
0
Left Right Front Rear

Spectator, 7m (23') Energy Average

The D39EX-22 average spectator noise level was 10.8 dB(A) less. This makes a much quieter environment for co-workers
and jobsite neighbors.

10 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

When doing side by side demos with the 650J pay attention to the noise levels of each machine, in and out of the cab.
Your customer will notice the difference with their ears. Two types of tests were performed, static (machine does not
move) and traveling.

10
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Noise Levels–Traveling
Test Conditions: High idle and same travel speed for
each machine.
Model Komatsu Deere
Noise Levels dB(A) D39EX-22 650J LT
Energy Average Forward 81.5 86.8
Reverse 81.9 86.8

Noise Levels dB(A)

100 86.8 86.8

81.5 81.9
90
80
70
60 Komatsu D39EX-22
50 Deere 650J LT
40
30
20
10
0
Forward Reverse

Energy Average

Traveling spectator noise levels for the D39EX-22 were lower also. For forward travel, the D39EX-22 was an average of
5.3 dB(A) lower. In reverse, the D39EX-22 was 4.9 dB(A) lower. Both machines were on the same course and traveled at
the same ground speed.

11 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

11
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Blade Visibility – Straight Blade

KOMATSU DEERE

The D39EX-22 has better blade visibility than the Deere

650J LT. The operator has less obstructions blocking his
forward view.

12 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

Many areas of the D39 were redesigned to optimize blade visibility including the lower box section area which no
longer blocks your view to the back of the cutting edge.

12
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Blade Visibility – Angled Blade

KOMATSU DEERE

13 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

13
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Forward Visibility
KOMATSU DEERE

E
B

Forward Vision KOMATSU DEERE

A Eye point- tip of the blade mm (in) 3200 (126.0) 3250 (128.0)

B Eye point-1m height pole mm (in) 3200 (126.0) 4490 (176.8)

C Tip of the blade-1m height pole mm (in) 0 1240 (48.8)
D Ground line-eye point mm (in) 2500 (98.4) 2450 (96.5)

E Eye point-possible view forward mm (in) 5340 (210.2) 7590 (298.8)

The D39EX-22 has better forward visibility than the Deere 650J LT, a 7 foot advantage!

** Remember, when discussing visibility distance, that distance will differ due to the height of the operator. **
For example, when comparing a potential customer’s 650J to the D39 have them sit in both machines and use cones to
mark their visibility. In our testing we used a medium sized operator. A taller operator will have better visibility than our
testing results since their eye level will be higher in the cab. Make sure both machines have the seat adjusted to the same
position.
14 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

Customers spend a majority of their time looking forward as compared to the other three directions. Having superior
forward visibility makes it easier for the operator to adjust to changing ground conditions faster. Therefore they are
more productive.

14
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Ride – Cab Mounts

KOMATSU DEERE

N/A (ROPS Canopy)

Viscous mounts; The D39-22 utilizes a better cab mounting Rubber mounts are used on the 650J cab and ROPS
system. It uses a cab damper system filled with silicon oil. canopy machines. They are inferior to the D39-22 mounts
This is the same system used on Komatsu Wheel Loaders in vibration reduction and ride quality.
and Excavators and provides a better ride since it reduces
vibration and noise felt by the operator.

15 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

Rubber mounts are used on the Komatsu ROPS canopy machines.

15
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Doors
KOMATSU DEERE

N/A (ROPS Canopy)

RH and LH doors
Rear hinged
180° open angle

16 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

16
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Entry/Exit
KOMATSU DEERE

Handrails: Handrails:
2 each side – 1 on nose and 2 each side – 1 on nose and 1
1 on hood top on hood top

Step dimensions: Step dimensions:

170 mm (6.7") wide x 190 mm (7.5") wide x
115 mm (4.5") deep on C- 125 mm (4.9") deep on C-
frame frame

17 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

17
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Transmission Control
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 has the ability to run the hydrostatic The 650J can only be run in a variable mode which may not
transmission (HST) in two modes, Quick-shift (3 speed), match the customer’s preference.
and Variable (20 speed) by activating a switch on the dash.
The D39-22 is more adaptable to differing customer
operating preferences and applications with the two
separate operating modes.
The D39-22 also has a graphical readout for a faster visual The 650J only has a number in an LCD screen to display
reference. the speed setting.

18 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

18
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Monitor
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 main monitor display has several functions that The 650J uses a basic monitor.
the 650J does not provide, including a data feed to Komtrax.
The display is colorful and easy to read.

19 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

See operator’s manual for more detailed information.

19
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Palm Command Control System (PCCS)

KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 features Palm Command Control System The 650J uses a work equipment lever that is directly
(PCCS) steering and blade controls for easy operation. connected to a valve via a linkage. Over time this linkage
will wear and become loose. This will make operation more
difficult.

20 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

20
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Pedals
KOMATSU DEERE

Brake Pedal Decelerator Pedal

The D39-22 utilizes separate brake and decelerator pedals The 650J uses a decelerator / brake pedal
for consistent and predictable operation. and a rocker switch. The operator must pre-
select brake and engine decelerator or just
brake function for this pedal.
Having to manually switch between
functions may not provide the operator with
the correct choice in changing applications.

21 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

This feature is very useful when going up to a sidewalk and backfilling. The operator can go up to an object quickly
and slow travel speed without dropping engine rpms. This allows for a faster cycle time since the operator does not
need to wait until the rpms increase (no lag in response). The operator can use the decelerator for maneuvering around
tight spots etc.

21
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Operator Environment Comparison Summary

KOMATSU D39EX-22 DEERE 650J LT

The D39EX-22 spectator average noise level was 10.8
Noise Levels-Stationary dB(A) less.
—

For forward travel, the D39EX-22 was an average of 5.3

Noise Levels-Traveling dB(A) lower, and in reverse, it was 4.9 dB(A) lower.
—

The D39EX-22 has better blade visibility. The operator

Blade Visibility-Straight —
has less obstructions blocking his forward view.

Blade Visibility-Angled — —

The D39EX-22 has better forward visibility than the

Forward Visibility Deere 650J LT.
—

Ride - Cab Mounts Viscous mounts (cab) Rubber mounts

Doors RH and LH doors; Rear hinged; 180° open angle N/A (ROPS Canopy)
Handrails: Handrails:
Entry/Exit
2 each side – 1 on nose and 1 on hood top 2 each side – 1 on nose and 1 on hood top
The D39-22 has the ability to run the hydrostatic
The 650J can only be run in a variable mode which may
Transmission Control transmission (HST) in two modes by activating a switch
not match the customer’s preference.
on the dash.
The D39-22 main monitor display has several functions
Monitor that the 650J does not provide, including a data feed to The 650J uses a basic monitor.
Komtrax. The display is colorful and easy to read.

The 650J uses a work equipment lever that is directly

Palm Command Control The D39-22 features Palm Command Control System connected to a valve via a linkage. Over time this
System (PCCS) (PCCS) steering and blade controls for easy operation. linkage will wear and become loose. This will make
operation more difficult.
The 650J ses a decelerator / brake pedal and a rocker
The D39-22 utilizes separate brake and decelerator
Pedals pedals for consistent and predictable operation.
switch. The operator must pre-select brake and engine
decelerator or just brake function for this pedal.

22 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

22
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Cab Air Filters

KOMATSU DEERE

N/A (ROPS Canopy)

The position of the fresh air filter is high and accessed at

the rear of the cab. The recirculation filter is easy to access
behind the operator.

23 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

23
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Engine Oil Level Check

KOMATSU DEERE

Door is equipped with a locking rod to hold the door open. Door does not lock open. Ground level access.
Ground level access.

24 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

24
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Engine Oil Fill

KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Must open LH engine door. Ground level access. Must open RH engine door.

25 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

25
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Engine Oil Filter

KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Must remove 6 bolts and 2 covers. Ground level access. Must open RH engine door.

26 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

26
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Engine Oil Drain

KOMATSU DEERE

Do not need to crawl under Must crawl under the machine to access.
machine to change oil. Must remove underbelly panel with four bolts.
Must remove four bolts and Ecology drain and hose.
cover. Equipped with ecology
drain and hose.

27 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

27
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Fuel Pre-Filter
KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Must Ground level access. Must open rear RH panel.
remove four bolts on front
hood door.

28 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

28
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Fuel Filter
KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access behind LH engine door. Good access Ground level access. Filter mounted low and difficult to
to the fuel filter. remove.

29 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

29
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Fuel Fill
KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level fill. Equipped Ground level fill. Not equipped

with fuel strainer. Cap easy with fuel strainer. Cap difficult
to remove. to remove.

30 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

30
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Coolant Reservoir
KOMATSU DEERE

Difficult to refill since it is

done through the overflow
bottle. Must run machine to
get air out and top off
several times. Fill at top of
engine hood while standing
on tracks.

Ground level fill of radiator and overflow bottle.

31 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

31
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Coolant Check
KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level checking and top off. Ground level check but more difficult under the hood.

32 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

32
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Fuel Tank Drain

KOMATSU DEERE

Easy ground level access behind rear RH door. Drain hose Must remove heavy rear panel
with shut off valve. with four bolts. Easy to spill
fuel. No drain hose.

33 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

33
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Coolant Drain
KOMATSU DEERE

Can access by crawling part way under rear of machine. Must crawl under the front of the machine to drain. Must
Must remove front cover with 4 bolts to drain engine block. remove front cover with 4 bolts to drain radiator. Ecology
Rear cover easily slides out after removing 8 bolts. Ecology drain with no hose.
drain with hose for rear radiator.

34 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

34
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Engine Air Filter

KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Filters pull straight out without Ground level access. Housing at awkward angle and
interference. Centrifugal precleaner is standard. contacts coolant hose when opening, pushing into a wire on
the back of the alternator. Rain cap is standard. (precleaner
is option)

35 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

35
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Hydraulic Oil Level Check

KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Protected behind rear LH door. Ground level access.
Protected behind rear LH and
RH doors. Two tank levels to
check.

36 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

36
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Hydraulic Oil Fill

KOMATSU DEERE

Easy ground level access

and fill. High quality breather
filter to minimize
contaminants in
the tank.
Breather
Fill filter

Two tanks and need a tool to remove caps. Ground level

access. No breathers.

37 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

37
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Hydraulic Oil Drain

KOMATSU DEERE

Must remove cover to access

Remove under tank cover with two bolts. Easy access to
ecology drain. Tight area
ecology drain.
near batteries.

38 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

38
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Hydraulic Oil Filters

KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Filters behind LH and RH tank doors. Ground level access. Filters
behind LH and RH access
panels.

39 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

39
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Batteries
KOMATSU DEERE

Ground level access. Two batteries on LH side. Easier Ground level access. Two batteries on LH side.
access to top off battery fluid.

40 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

40
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Final Drive Oil Level Check And Fill

KOMATSU DEERE

Easy access to plug. Easy access to plug.

41 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

41
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Grease Points
KOMATSU DEERE

Easy access to grease points. Easy access to grease points.

42 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

42
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Servicing Comparison Summary

KOMATSU D39EX-22 DEERE 650J LT

The position of the fresh air filter is high and accessed
Cab Air Filters at the rear of the cab. The recirculation filter is easy to N/A (ROPS Canopy)
access behind the operator.
Door is equipped with a locking rod to hold the door
Engine Oil Level Check Door does not lock open. Ground level access.
open. Ground level access.

Engine Oil Fill Ground level access. Must open LH engine door. Ground level access. Must open RH engine door.

Ground level access. Must remove 6 bolts and 2

Engine Oil Filter Ground level access. Must open RH engine door.
covers.
Do not need to crawl under machine to change oil. Must crawl under the machine to access. Must remove
Engine Oil Drain Must remove four bolts and cover. Equipped with underbelly panel with four bolts. Ecology drain and
ecology drain and hose. hose.
Ground level access. Must remove four bolts on front
Fuel Pre-Filter Ground level access. Must open rear RH panel.
hood door.
Ground level access behind LH engine door. Good Ground level access. Filter mounted low and difficult to
Fuel Filter access to the fuel filter. remove.
Ground level fill. Equipped with fuel strainer. Cap easy Ground level fill. Cap difficult to remove. Not equipped
Fuel Fill to remove. with fuel strainer.
Difficult to refill since it is done through the overflow
bottle. Must run machine to get air out and top off
Coolant Reservoir Ground level fill of radiator and overflow bottle.
several times. Fill at top of engine hood while standing
on tracks.

Coolant Check Ground level checking and top off. Ground level check but more difficult under the hood.

43 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

43
SERVICING COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Servicing Comparison Summary (continued)

KOMATSU D39EX-22 DEERE 650J LT

Easy ground level access behind rear RH door. Drain Must remove heavy rear panel with four bolts. Easy to
Fuel Tank Drain hose with shut off valve. spill fuel. No drain hose.
Can access by crawling part way under rear of
machine. Must remove front cover with 4 bolts to drain Must crawl under machine to drain. Must remove front
Coolant Drain engine block. Rear cover easily slides out after cover with 4 bolts to drain radiator. Ecology drain with
removing 8 bolts. Ecology drain with hose for rear no hose.
radiator.
Ground level access. Housing at awkward angle and
Ground level access. Filters pull straight out without contacts coolant hose when opening, pushing into a
Engine Air Filter interference. Centrifugal precleaner is standard. wire on the back of the alternator. Rain cap is standard.
(precleaner is option)
Ground level access. Protected behind rear LH and RH
Hydraulic Oil Level Check Ground level access. Protected behind rear LH door.
doors. Two tank levels to check.
Easy ground level access and fill. High quality breather Two tanks and need a tool to remove caps. Ground
Hydraulic Oil Fill filter to minimize contaminants in the tank. level access. No breather.
Remove under tank cover with two bolts. Easy access Must remove cover to access ecology drain. Tight area
Hydraulic Oil Drain to ecology drain. near batteries.
Ground level access. Filters behind LH and RH tank Ground level access. Filters behind LH and RH access
Hydraulic Oil Filters doors. panels.
Ground level access. Two batteries on LH side. Easier
Batteries access to top off battery fluid.
Ground level access. Two batteries on LH side.

Final Drive Oil Level Check &

Easy access to plug. Easy access to plug.
Fill

Grease Points Easy access to grease points. Easy access to grease points.

44 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

44
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Cooling System
KOMATSU DEERE

The radiator and coolers (side by side coolers) are moved The 650J uses a less efficient front mounted radiator /
from the engine area to the rear of the D39-22 for several coolers system with a less efficient belt driven fan which
reasons. This allows the D39-22 hood to be sharply sloped consumes more horsepower than an electronically-
for “best in class” blade visibility. It also allows air to be controlled hydraulically-driven fan.
pulled from the rear side doors which is cooler and cleaner
than on conventional machines. This innovative system
also means the D39-22 electronically-controlled
hydraulically-driven fan can run slower to deliver air across
the side-by-side coolers as required and therefore uses less
fuel.

45 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

45
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Hydraulic System
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 uses a variable displacement piston pump for The 650J has a gear pump system.
work equipment.
A variable piston pump is more fuel efficient and quieter A fixed displacement pump produces flow proportional to
than the 650J’s gear pump system. It is more efficient engine speed regardless of the required output needed by
because it only pumps the amount of oil required, and that the machine.
reduces the horsepower requirement to run the pump and
saves fuel.
A fixed displacement pump also helps create a noisier
machine because the pump is running at a speed that is
directly tied to engine rpm. As engine rpm increases so
does the noise level from the fixed displacement pump.

46 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

46
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Blade Skin Thickness

KOMATSU DEERE

D39-22: 8.4 mm (0.33") 650J: 8.0 mm (0.31")

47 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

47
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Hose and Cylinder Protection

KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 has better hose and tilt cylinder protection. The 650J hoses are more out in the open and are at greater
The D39-22 hoses are tightly secured against the C-Frame risk of being tugged by debris. The hoses are looped in the
with rubber iso-mounts and protected with bolt-on guarding air and are protected with hose sleeves. The 650J does not
and hose sleeves. The D39-22 uses a bolt-on spill guard to have a bolt-on spill guard for the tilt cylinder.
protect the tilt cylinder.

48 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

48
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Blade Cylinder Mounts

KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 blade cylinder The 650J just uses a narrow

mounts are stronger since the weld-on mounting pad that
mounting area is larger which covers a smaller area of the
better distributes impact loads blade.
evenly across a wider area of
the blade. This makes this
area of the blade more
durable.

49 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

49
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Blade Center Pivot Ball

KOMATSU DEERE

Shims to
adjust for
wear Shims to adjust
for wear

Bolt-on ball

Weld-on ball

The D39-22 has a large center pivot ball which is durable, The 650J uses a smaller weld-on ball which requires the
easier to service and easier to adjust for wear between use of a welder when replacement is necessary. This
major repairs. The D39-22’s large diameter ball provides a means that it costs more over the life of the machine to
larger surface area to absorb the loads and spread the maintain this area of the 650J blade.
wear. The D39-22 ball is bolt-on for easy “in field” service
that does not require a welder. The ball can be adjusted
easily for wear using shims.

50 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

50
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Blade Castings
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 uses steel castings in the blade system to Overall the 650J uses very few castings and relies heavily
better distribute stress loads from the blade to the main on fabrication in its construction, which does not distribute
frame. stress loads as well, reducing the overall durability of the
blade.

For example, the D39-22 uses a cast steel tower as

apposed to a fabricated tower on the 650J.

51 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

51
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

C-Frame Mounts
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 main frame supports, where the blade lift The 650J has fabricated mounts. Which do you think can
cylinders mount, are strong steel castings. handle more impact loads? Don’t forget to point out to your
customers the added value castings provide.

52 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

52
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Undercarriage
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22EX has 2185 mm (86") of track on ground. The The 650J has 2184 mm (86") of track on ground. The 650J
D39 track frame is welded to the main frame for added track frame is bolted to the main frame which is less
strength. The D39-22 has one carrier roller and a rigid track durable. The 650J also has bolt-on covers that are
frame. expensive to replace. The 650J has one carrier roller and a
rigid track frame.

53 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

53
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Front Idler
KOMATSU DEERE

The front idler tension adjustment is done with a grease The front idler tension adjustment is done with a grease
gun. gun.

54 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

54
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Drive Motors
KOMATSU DEERE

The D39-22 has the drive motors mounted in the track The 650J has its drive motors mounted in the main frame.
frame with the final drive. This compact assembly is very A drive shaft passes thorough the rear frame to the final
easy to service. An added benefit of the D39-22 drive drive, making servicing of the final drive or motor more
system configuration is that it is easier to clean than the complicated.
650J in this area.

55 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

55
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Modular Construction
KOMATSU DEERE

Modular construction of the D39-22 makes it more durable, The Deere uses less castings and thinner sheet metal in its
easier to service and minimizes rattle type noises. The construction. The Deere has more pieces in its design so
main frame utilizes castings and thick steel plate for there is a greater chance for rattle noises over time.
unmatched durability. The hood, fenders and other external
components also use thick steel plates which reduce the
need for additional guarding and make a machine that will
look better longer. After many hours of service your
customer can sandblast and paint it and it will almost look
new again. This makes the D39-22 a better investment for
your customers who keep their equipment longer.

56 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

56
COMPONENT & STRUCTURE COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Component & Structure Comparison Summary

KOMATSU D39EX-22 DEERE 650J LT

The 650J uses a less efficient front mounted radiator /
The radiator and coolers (side by side coolers) are
coolers system with a less efficient belt driven fan
Cooling System moved from the engine area to the rear of the D39-22 for
which consumes more horsepower than an
a better cooling system.
electronically-controlled hydraulically-driven fan.
The D39-22 uses a variable displacement piston pump
Hydraulic System for work equipment.
The 650J has a gear pump system.

Blade Skin Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33") 8.0 mm (0.31")

The 650J hoses are more out in the open and are at
Hose & Cylinder Protection The D39-22 has better hose and tilt cylinder protection.
greater risk of being tugged by debris.
The blade cylinder mounts are stronger since the
The 650J just uses a weld-on mounting pad that is
Blade Cylinder Mounts mounting area is wider which better distributes impact
mounted over a shorter area of the blade.
loads evenly across a wider area of the blade.
The D39-22 has a large center pivot ball which is
The 650J uses a smaller weld-on ball which requires the
Blade Center Pivot Ball durable, easier to service and easier to adjust for wear
use of a welder when replacement is necessary.
between major repairs.
The D39-22 uses steel castings in the blade system to Overall, uses very few castings and relies heavily on
Blade Castings better distribute stress loads from the blade to the main fabrication, which does not distribute stress loads as
frame. well, reducing the overall durability of the blade.
The main frame supports, where the blade lift cylinders
C-Frame Mounts The 650J has fabricated mounts.
mount, are strong steel castings.
Track frame is welded to the main frame for added Track frame is bolted to the main frame which is less
Undercarriage
strength. durable.
The front idler tension adjustment is done with a grease The front idler tension adjustment is done with a grease
Front Idler gun. gun.
The drive motors are mounted in the track frame with
Drive Motors The drive motors are mounted in the main frame.
the final drive.
Uses less castings and thinner sheet metal. More
Modular construction makes it more durable, easier to
Modular Construction service and minimizes rattle type noises.
pieces in its design so there is a greater chance for
rattle noises over time.

57 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

57
SPECIFICATION COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Specification Comparison Table

Komatsu Deere
D39EX-22 650J LT
NET kW (HP) @ RPM 79 (105) @ 2200 74 (99) @ 2200
OPERATING WEIGHT - kg (lb) 9450 (20,834) 8419 (18,560)
ENGINE:
Displacement - ltr. (cu. in.) 4.46 (272) 4.5 (276)
Cylinders 4 4
Manufacturer Komatsu Deere
Model SAA4D107E-1 4045H
Turbocharged/Aftercooled Turbocharged / Air-to-air Turbocharged / Air-to-air
Aftercooled Aftercooled
POWER TRANSFER Hydrostatic Hydrostatic
TRANSMISSION:
Transmission Type Dual path Dual path
Forward Gear Range - max kph (mph) 3F 8.5 (5.3) 1F 8.0 (5.0)
Reverse Gear Range - max kph (mph) 3R 8.5 (5.3) 1R 8.0 (5.0)
Direct Drive Available No No
FINAL DRIVE Double reduction Triple reduction
STEERING/BRAKE Dual-path HS w/ctr Dual-path HS w/ctr
rotation / Hydrostatic rotation / Hydrostatic
drive drive
STEERING CONTROL Joystick Joystick
UNDERCARRIAGE:
Track Shoe, Std./Max. - mm. (in.) 460/510 (18.1"/20") 457/457 (18"/18")
Track Link Pitch - mm. (in.) NP 171 (6.73")
Track on Ground - mm. (in.) 2360 (92.9") 2210 (87")
No. of Track Shoes (each side) 39 38
No. of Track Rollers (each side) 6 6
Track Gauge - mm. (ft. in.) 1650 (5' 5") 1549 (5' 1")
Ground Contact Area - cm2 (in2) 21710 (3,365) 20206 (3,132)
Ground Pressure - kPa (psi.) 42.7 (6.19) 40.7 (5.9)

58 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

58
SPECIFICATION COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Specification Comparison Table – (Continued)

Komatsu Deere
D39EX-22 650J LT
HYDRAULIC SYSTEM:
Pump Type Piston Gear
Pump Flow - L/min (gpm) 99 (26.2) 56.8 (15)
System Pressure - kPa (psi) 27460 (3,983) 20684 (3,000)
GENERAL DIMENSIONS:
Length w/Blade - mm. (ft. in.) 4335 (14' 3") 4089 (13' 5")
Height w/ROPS - mm. (ft. in.) 3015 (9' 11") 2769 (9' 1")
Ground Clearance - mm. (ft. in.) 385 (15.2") 363 (14.3")
FLUID REFILL CAPACITIES:
Fuel Tank - ltr. (gal.) 195 (51.5) 178 (47)
Cooling System - ltr. (gal.) 23 (6.1) 16 (4.2)
Diesel Engine Crankcase - ltr. (gal.) 15 (4.0) 14 (3.7)
Power Train - ltr. (gal.) NA 43 (11.4)
Final Drive, each - ltr. (gal.) 3.5 (0.9) 6.6 (1.7)
Hydraulic Tank - ltr. (gal.) 60 (15.9) 32.2 (8.5)
BLADE:
Blade Type 6-way PAT 6-way PAT
Dimensions, Width x Height - mm (ft. in.) 2710 x 980 (8' 11" x 3' 3") 2667 x 1067 (8' 9" x 3' 6")
Capacity, SAE - m3 (cu. yd.) 2.21 (2.89) 2.22 (2.91)
Lift Maximum - mm (ft. in.) 900 (2' 11") 818 (2' 8")
Dig Maximum - mm (ft. in.) 450 (1' 6") 500 (1' 8")
Blade Width at Full Angle - mm. (ft. in.) 2490 (8' 2") 2667 (8' 9")
Blade Tilt - mm. (ft. in.) 370 (14.6") 363 (14.3")
Adjustable Blade Pitch Yes Yes
ALTERNATE BLADE:
Alternate Blade Type NOT AVAILABLE 6-way PAT
Dimensions, Width x Height - mm. (in.) NOT AVAILABLE 3150 x 894 (10' 4" x 2' 11")
Capacity, SAE - m3 (cu. yd.) NOT AVAILABLE 1.88 (2.46)
Lift Maximum - mm. (in.) NOT AVAILABLE 818 (2' 8")
Dig Maximum - mm. (in.) NOT AVAILABLE 500 (1' 8")
PUBLICATION NUMBER: AESS769-00 3/08 DKAJUDZR (08-05)

59 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

59
SPECIFICATION COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Specification Comparison Table – (Continued)

Komatsu Deere
D39PX-22 650J LGP
NET kW (HP) @ RPM 79 (105) @ 2200 74 (99) @ 2200
OPERATING WEIGHT - kg (lb) 9890 (21,804) 8977 (19,750)
ENGINE:
Displacement - ltr. (cu. in.) 4.46 (272) 4.5 (276)
Cylinders 4 4
Manufacturer Komatsu Deere
Model SAA4D107E-1 4045H
Turbocharged/Aftercooled Turbocharged / Air-to-air Turbocharged / Air-to-air
Aftercooled Aftercooled
POWER TRANSFER Hydrostatic Hydrostatic
TRANSMISSION:
Transmission Type Dual path Dual path
Forward Gear Range - max kph (mph) 3F 8.5 (5.3) 1F 8.0 (5.0)
Reverse Gear Range - max kph (mph) 3R 8.5 (5.3) 1R 8.0 (5.0)
Direct Drive Available No No
FINAL DRIVE Double reduction Triple reduction
STEERING/BRAKE Dual-path HS w/ctr Dual-path HS w/ctr
rotation / Hydrostatic rotation / Hydrostatic
drive drive
STEERING CONTROL Joystick Joystick
UNDERCARRIAGE:
Track Shoe, Std./Max. - mm. (in.) 635/700 (25"/27.5") 711/711 (28"/28")
Track Link Pitch - mm. (in.) NP 171 (6.73")
Track on Ground - mm. (in.) 2360 (92.9") 2337 (92")
No. of Track Shoes (each side) 39 40
No. of Track Rollers (each side) 6 7
Track Gauge - mm. (ft. in.) 1790 (5' 10") 1753 (5' 9")
Ground Contact Area - cm 2 (in2) 29970 (4,645) 33239 (5,152)
Ground Pressure - kPa (psi.) 32.3 (4.69) 26.2 (3.8)

60 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

60
SPECIFICATION COMPARISON D39EX-22 vs. Deere 650J LT

Specification Comparison Table – (Continued)

Komatsu Deere
D39PX-22 650J LGP
HYDRAULIC SYSTEM:
Pump Type Piston Gear
Pump Flow - L/min (gpm) 99 (26.2) 56.8 (15)
System Pressure - kPa (psi) 27460 (3,983) 20684 (3,000)
GENERAL DIMENSIONS:
Length w/Blade - mm. (ft. in.) 4335 (14' 3") 4242 (13' 11")
Height w/ROPS - mm. (ft. in.) 3015 (9' 11") 2769 (9' 1")
Ground Clearance - mm. (ft. in.) 385 (15.2") 363 (14.3")
FLUID REFILL CAPACITIES:
Fuel Tank - ltr. (gal.) 195 (51.5) 178 (47)
Cooling System - ltr. (gal.) 23 (6.1) 16 (4.2)
Diesel Engine Crankcase - ltr. (gal.) 15 (4.0) 14 (3.7)
Power Train - ltr. (gal.) NA 43 (11.4)
Final Drive, each - ltr. (gal.) 3.5 (0.9) 6.6 (1.7)
Hydraulic Tank - ltr. (gal.) 60 (15.9) 32.2 (8.5)
BLADE:
Blade Type 6-way PAT 6-way PAT
Dimensions, Width x Height - mm (ft. in.) 3250 x 910 (10' 8" x 3' 0") 3251 x 955 (10' 8" x 3' 2")
Capacity, SAE - m3 (cu. yd.) 2.3 (3.00) 2.22 (2.91)
Lift Maximum - mm (ft. in.) 900 (2' 11") 818 (2' 8")
Dig Maximum - mm (ft. in.) 450 (1' 6") 500 (1' 8")
Blade Width at Full Angle - mm. (ft. in.) 2980 (9' 9") 3010 (9' 11")
Blade Tilt - mm. (ft. in.) 445 (17.5") 445 (17.5")
Adjustable Blade Pitch Yes Yes
ALTERNATE BLADE:
Alternate Blade Type 6-way PAT 6-way PAT
Dimensions, Width x Height - mm. (in.) 2980 x 910 (9' 9" x 3' 0") 2921 x 955 (9' 7" x 3' 2")
Capacity, SAE - m3 (cu. yd.) 2.08 (2.72) 1.96 (2.57)
Lift Maximum - mm. (in.) 900 (2' 11") 818 (2' 8")
Dig Maximum - mm. (in.) 450 (1' 6") 500 (1' 8")
PUBLICATION NUMBER: AESS769-00 3/08 DKAJUDZR (08-05)

61 of 61 QUIT PREV NEXT MENU

61
NOTES:
NOTES:
 This information has been gathered to provide data on the performance of KOMATSU and com-
petitive machines under actual job conditions. Every effort was made to ensure reliable results.
However, because of the many variables peculiar to each job (including material characteristics,
operator efficiency, labor and other costs, haul road conditions, and altitude), neither KOMATSU
LTD., nor any of its subsidiaries or distributors can or does warrant expressly or implicitly that
Komatsu or competitive equipment referred to will achieve the performance or incur the costs indi-
cated under other, though similar, circumstances.
The information contained herein is intended for circulation only to Komatsu employees and to
those distributor employees, whose duties require knowledge of such reports, and is intended sole-
ly for the information and training of these readers. UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS
HEREBY PROHIBITED AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH USE SHALL BE SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WITH THIRD PARTIES THAT MAY INCUR AS A RESULT OF
SUCH USE. Any reproduction of this release without the foregoing explanation is prohibited.

AECI429-00 ©2008 Komatsu America Corp. Printed in USA D08(POD)CCI 08/08 (EV-1)

www.KomatsuAmerica.com Komatsu America Corp. is an authorized licensee of Komatsu Ltd.

Materials and specifications are subject to change without notice
is a registered trademark of Komatsu Ltd., Japan
KOMTRAX® is a registered trademark of Komatsu America Corp.