See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/353016265

Comparative Case Study Difference Between Azure Cloud SQL and Atlas
MongoDB NoSQL Database

Article  in  International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science · July 2021
DOI: 10.30534/ijeter/2021/26972021

CITATIONS READS
0 243

6 authors, including:

Fahim Uz Zaman Mansoor Khuhro

Sindh Madressatul Islam University Sindh Madressatul Islam University
3 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS    23 PUBLICATIONS   7 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Kamlesh Kumar Ayesha Kalhoro

Sindh Madressatul Islam University Sindh Madressatul Islam University
38 PUBLICATIONS   126 CITATIONS    1 PUBLICATION   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

123456 View project

Handwritten Urdu character recognition via images using different machine learning and deep learning techniques View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Fahim Uz Zaman on 06 July 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 ISSN 2347 - 3983
Fahim Uz Zaman et al., International Journal of Emerging
Volume 9.Trends
No. 7,inJuly
Engineering
2021 Research, 9(7), July 2021, 999 – 1002
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research
Available Online at http://www.warse.org/IJETER/static/pdf/file/ijeter26972021.pdf
https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2021/26972021

Comparative Case Study Difference Between Azure Cloud

SQL and Atlas MongoDB NoSQL Database
Fahim Uz Zaman1, Mansoor Ahemed Khuhro1, Kamlesh Kumar2, Naadiya Mirbahar1,3, Muhammad
Zohaib Khan1, Ayesha Kalhoro1
1
Department of Computer Science, Sindh Madressatul-Islam University, Karachi, Sindh, 74000, Pakistan.
2
Department of Software Engineering, Sindh Madressatul-Islam University, Karachi, Sindh, 74000, Pakistan.
3
Department of Computer Science, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

 objects are arranged in columns and rows as a series of tables.

ABSTRACT Tables are used to contain information about items in the
database. Each column in a table holds a certain kind of data
Azure SQL and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL(Azure instance) and a field stores the actual value of an attribute. The rows in
databases are the most popular, systematic process to database
the table represent a collection of related values of one object
solutions. Which Azure SQL database is also referred to as
RDBMS (Relational Database Management Systems). The or entity. A special identification called the primary key can
data are structured into tables or associations. The Atlas be used for each row of a table, and columns may be generated
Mongodb NoSQL database is called a non-relational database using foreign keys in certain tables. Relational database work
management systems. The data are included in unstructured on vertically adaptable and utilized in store procedures, join
tables or associations. In this research, evaluate both the queries, views methods, etc. A database that does not use the
Azure SQL and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL databases. During table pattern of rows and columns used in most of the standard
the experiment compare the loading time, response time, and
database frames may be a non-related database. Instead,
retrieval time of both Azure SQL and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL
databases, and justify which one is fast, efficient and better non-relational databases use a capacity model designed for
performance. the basic specifications of the type of information that is being
supplied. For illustration, information may be put away as
Key words : SQL, Atlas Mongodb NoSQL Database, SQL, basic keys and values sets, records, charts, columns store and
MongoDB. non- relational database utilized in Atlas Mongodb NoSQL
Database. The following Figure: 1 is clearly defining Azure
1. INTRODUCTION
SQL and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL Databases.
Today mostly in the industry, there are many databases used.
Some of them are SQL, and some are NoSQL. The standard
[1]language for handling structured queries. An RDMS
database defines table relations, and NoSQL is a
non-relational database management system. There is a fixed,
static, or preselected pattern in SQL databases and NoSQL
databases have an unstructured schema. Azure SQL
programming (DML, DDL, and DCL) can be used in an
effective way to collect declarations and Atlas Mongodb
NoSQL database queries. It prevents joining and is easy to
scale Atlas Mongodb NoSQL, which does not require a fixed
scheme. Scale Azure SQL databases vertically scale, and Figure1: Azure SQL and Atlas MongoDB NoSQL Database
(reproduced from [16])
scale Atlas Mongodb NoSQL databases horizontally.
Databases are utilized in numerous organizations, managing
2. BACKGROUND
an account, website, and numerous other industries. A
relational database is a list of predefined data objects. These SQL is Hierarchical Database Management Framework is
also known as (RDMS). The architecture of the best-known

999
Fahim Uz Zaman et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 9(7), July 2021, 999 – 1002

open source database system worldwide is very significant,

and architecture of SQL is unique to another many major
users, including Oracle, Microsoft Azure SQL and DB2. It is
Structured Query Language (SQL) program. This statements
used in (DML, DDL, DCL and TCL). Relationship
approaches used in ERD, Database Schema, Joining Quires,
Views, and Triggers program. It is easy to understand and
easy to read for consumers. In Figure 2: Azure SQL
Figure4: Two Relational Database Tables (reproduced from [14])
Database languages & Figure 3: Entity Relationship
Diagram (ERD) are well defined.
Atlas Mongodb NoSQL database management system for
high-capacity data storage, and it uses collections,
documents, field, embedded documents and primary key
(default key _id provided by MongoDB itself). Documents are
primary value pairs and are the simple data unit of MongoDB.
The collections contain record sets and associated tables-like
features. It is a non-relational database, also
Figure2: Azure SQL Database languages (reproduced from [17]) document-oriented database software for open sources and
cross platforms. In the four architectural trends of the data,
and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL trends can be saved (Key Values,
Columns, Documents, and Graphs). It’s uses JSON-like
documents with optional schemas, known as an Atlas
Mongodb NoSQL database application. This has been used
for CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete) and
aggregate functions etc.

2.2 Document Data Model

Document Data Model that reflects their particular category.

A huge volume of information can be saved in the single
document and can nest records. Key value stores have a
simple data model, and just as their name suggests. Wide
column stores more features, variable in data types, and
number of columns in use than row-based relational database.
From the Figure 5: are clearly defining MongoDB Relational
Documents two tables.

Figure3: Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) (reproduced from).

2.1 Relational Data Model

The main model of data is relational data. It is commonly used

in data collection and retrieval around the world. This is a
basic model with all the properties and capabilities needed to
efficiently process data. Relations are stored in table format in
a relational data model. This format saves the interaction
between individuals. The relationships have various
examples: relationship schema, relationship key and
aggregate function is used.

The following Figure: 4 are clearly defining Two Relational Figure5: MongoDB Relational Documents two tables (reproduced from
Database tables. [15])

1000
Fahim Uz Zaman et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 9(7), July 2021, 999 – 1002

Table 1: Comparison of Azure SQL and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL 3. Retrieval Time: It is total amount of time it takes to all
Databases (reproduced from [9]) retrieve data. It is a part and parcel communication
Distinguishing Azure Atlas system.
Feature SQL Mongodb
NoSQL
Relational Yes No
SQL Yes No
Document NO Yes
OLTP (Online Not fully
transaction processing) Supported
Scaling No Yes
Query Complexity Low High
Distributed No Yes

Figure 6: Azure SQL Database Ten Thousand Records

3. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AZURE SQL AND
ATLAS MONGODB NOSQL DATABASE
JMeter is a open source and stress tester [18] used mainly for
checking the performance of web applications. JMeter
connect SQL database, and MongoDB database through
NodeJS programming language. During experiment use the
SQL database inner join query is to merge two tables and use
the same aggregate feature inner join solution in the
MongoDB code base and run three different programs after
logging in to the data database and received three different
results (first program run ten thousand, second program run Figure 7: Atlas Mongodb NoSQL Database Ten housand Records
twenty thousand, and third program thirty thousand) records
and results found through google network performance. Figure 8: Azure SQL Database Twenty Thousand Records
Throughout all of these applications are running on the
personal computer. The configuration of pc is given below:
 Processor Intel(R) core i7-3770 CPU @2.50 GHz, Second
Generation.
 RAM 8.00 GB.
 System 64 Bit operating system.
 Windows 10 (Professional).
 SSD 512 GB.

Empirical work has implemented on both Azure SQL

database (SQL), and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL Database Figure 9: Atlas Mongodb NoSQL Database Twenty Thousand
Records
(MongoDB). Comparison has been found on two databases,
with the parameters, loading time, response time, and
retrieval time using database table and method used through
inner join (SQL), and aggregate function (Atlas Mongodb
NoSQL) databases.
1. Loading Time: It is average amount of time it takes for a
page on show in your page of screen.
2. Response Time: It takes a total of time to answer a service
request.

Figure 10: Azure SQL Database Thirty Thousand Records

1001
Fahim Uz Zaman et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 9(7), July 2021, 999 – 1002

database", 2017 IOP Conference Series: Materials

Science and Engineering.
[6] Jitender Kumar1, Varsha Garg2, "Security analysis of
unstructured data in NOSQL MongoDB database", 2017
International Conference on Computing and
Communication Technologies for Smart Nation
(IC3TSN).
[7] Elena Baralis1, Andrea Dalla Valle2, Paolo
Garza,Claudio Rossi3, Francesco Scullino4,"SQL versus
NoSQL databases for geospatial applications",2017
IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).
Figure 10: Atlas Mongodb NoSQL Database Thirty Thousand
[8] Sitalakshmi Venkatraman 1, Kiran Fahd2, Samuel
Records Kaspi3, Ramanathan Venkatraman 4, "SQL Versus
NoSQL Movement with Big Data Analytics", 2016, I.J.
Information Technology and Computer Science.
4. CONCLUSION [9] Sneha Binani1, Ajinkya Gutti2, Shivam Upadhyay3,
"SQL vs. NoSQL vs. NewSQL- A Comparative Study",
Communications on Applied Electronics (CAE) – ISSN :
During the experiment checking the performance of two 2394-4714 Foundation of Computer Science FCS, New
databases with records on Azure SQL and Atlas Mongodb York, USA Volume 6 – No.1, October 2016.
NoSQL. The parameters loading time, response time, and [10] Cornelia Győrödi1, Robert Győrödi2 ,George Pecherle3,
retrieval time have been observed on both databases Azure Andrada Olah4, "A comparative study: MongoDB vs.
MySQL", 2015 13th International Conference on
SQL (SQL), and Atlas Mongodb NoSQL (MongoDB)
Engineering of Modern Electric Systems (EMES).
through JMeter database connectivity, it has been observed
[11] https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-548fdcb1dec786
that Azure SQL (SQL) loading time, response time, and 5303859def292f1f30
retrieval time much less than the Atlas Mongodb NoSQL [12] https://csharpcorner.azureedge.net/UploadFile/BlogIma
(MongoDB) loading time, response time, and retrieval time. ges/01032017000551AM/image002.png
According to these results we can say that Azure SQL [13] https://www.cs.uregina.ca/Links/class-info/215/images/
Database is more efficient and faster than Atlas Mongodb crow_foot.png
[14] https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cW-rgspRrX8/hqdefault.jpg
NoSQL Database on the bases of parameters loading time,
[15] https://image.slidesharecdn.com/mongodbrdbmsmigrat
response time, and retrieval time. ionwebinar-140202060406-phpapp02/95/migrating-fro
m-relational-databases-to-mongodb-10-638.jpg?cb=139
REFERENCES 1321199
[1] Nidamanuri Amani1, Yelchuri Rajesh2,"Comparative [16] https://www.danielleskosky.com/sql-nosql-whats-the-di
Study of Open-Source NOSQL Document-Based fference/
Databases",2020 Information and Communication [17] https://techieshouts.com/types-of-sql-statements/
Technology for Intelligent Systems (ICTIS). [18] Zaman, F. U., Khan, A. H., & Owais, M. (2021).
[2] Zakariyaa Ait El Mouden1, Abdeslam Jakimi2, Moha Performance Evaluation Of Amazon’s, Google’s, And
Hajar3, Mohamed Boutahar4, "Graph Schema Storage in Microsoft’s Serverless Functions: A Comparative Study.
SQL Object-Relational Database and NoSQL International Journal of Scientific and Technology
Document-Oriented Database: A Comparative Study", Research, 10(04), 189-192.
2019 Innovation in Information Systems and
Technologies to Support Learning Research.
[3] Wisal Khan1, Waqas Ahmad2, Bin Luo, Ejaz Ahmed3,
"SQL Database with physical database tuning technique
and NoSQL graph database comparisons", 2019 IEEE
3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic
and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC).
[4] Fatima Yassine1, Mamoun Adel Awad2, "Migrating from
SQL to NOSQL Database: Practices and Analysis", 2018
International Conference on Innovations in Information
Technology (IIT).
[5] Sunita1 Ghotiya2, Juhi Mandal3, Saravanakumar
Kandasamy1, "Migration from relational to NoSQL

1002

View publication stats