Materials 12 02754 v2
Materials 12 02754 v2
Review
Self-Repairing Composites for Corrosion Protection:
A Review on Recent Strategies and
Evaluation Methods
Poornima Vijayan P 1 and Mariam Al-Maadeed 2,3, *
1 Department of Chemistry, Sree Narayana College for Women, Kollam, Kerala 691001, India
2 Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
3 Materials Science and Technology Program, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Received: 5 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; Published: 27 August 2019
Abstract: The use of self-healing coatings to protect metal substrates, such as aluminum alloys,
stainless steel, carbon steel, and Mg alloys from corrosion is an important aspect for protecting metals
and for the economy. During the past decade, extensive transformations on self-healing strategies
were introduced in protective coatings, including the use of green components. Scientists used
extracts of henna leaves, aloe vera, tobacco, etc. as corrosion inhibitors, and cellulose nanofibers,
hallyosite nanotubes, etc. as healing agent containers. This review gives a concise description
on the need for self-healing protective coatings for metal parts, the latest extrinsic self-healing
strategies, and the techniques used to follow-up the self-healing process to control the corrosion of
metal substrates. Common techniques, such as accelerated salt immersion test and electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy (EIS), for evaluating the self-healing process in protective coatings are
explained. We also show recent advancements procedures, such as scanning vibrating electrode
technique (SVET) and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM), as successful techniques in
evaluating the self-healing process in protective coatings.
1. Introduction
It is important to protect the surface of metals against corrosion. This protection is more important
when compared to the bulk protection, as the surface is more exposed to the environment and prone
to mechanical and solvent attacks. Corrosion can be expected in the metal if there are cracks or pits
on the surface. The estimated cost of corrosion is approximately 3.4% of the global GDP (2013) [1].
Most of this cost is related to the inspection processes, repairing techniques, and environment and
safety procedures. One of the most expensive corrosion cost is in oil and gas facilities. Protection
against corrosion is important for the modern world, as it will reduce the financial cost. It is important
to ensure the safety and reliability of industry, reduction of waste production, and energy consumption.
Cathodic protection, anodic protection, addition of inhibitors, protective coating, etc., are
commonly practiced corrosion protection methods. Among them, a widely accepted protection
method is the use of a suitable coating, which can protect the surface of the metal from the environment.
Chemical substances, called inhibitors, can be added into coating in small quantities to decrease the
corrosion rate. The basic idea of coating is to prevent the diffusion of oxygen and moisture to the metal.
In addition to that, organic coatings have excellent impact resistance, aesthetic properties, and substrate
adhesion [2]. Among protective coatings, organic coating is the oldest and most widely used protective
coating technology [3]. Inhibitors can be added to the coatings, which ensures that they will not be
leached and it is effective for the used metal [4].
As a variant of organic coating, organic-inorganic hybrid coatings consist of both the organic
component and inorganic fillers (mostly silica), bonded together by the covalent bonds [5]. Hybrid
coatings with titania as the inorganic component have also been reported in sol-gel coating films and
nanocomposites coatings [6,7]. The combination of these two types of materials will ensure good
mechanical properties, flexibility, adhesion, and transparency. Though organic coatings are effective,
the needs for green anticorrosion techniques are high due to environmental issues such as greenhouse
gas emission and global warming. Moreover, the economic concerns of crude oil and manufacturing
prices encourage us to look to green alternatives for organic coating.
With the advancement in coatings research, many researchers have reported on smart coatings
that show stimuli responsive action. The smart coating can include different responses, such as
self-healing, self-cleaning, corrosion sensing, and anti-fouling. Among smart coating technologies,
the self-healing coating concept has been introduced as a novel approach for achieving the corrosion
protection function. The automatic response to corrosion can be tailored to different factors, such as
abrasions, change in pH, surface tension, and temperature. Self-repairing organic and inorganic coating
can increase the functional lifetime of the resulting coating structure. The self-healing functionality
can be imparted, due to the presence of nano/micro containers of polymer and inorganic origin in the
coating structure. The current review paper intended to detail these extrinsic strategies in designing
self-healing coating structures with greater focus on green approaches. Depending on the end use
applications, the follow-up methods that were adopted to evaluate the healing process are important
and those will also be discussed.
Figure 1. Size distribution (left) and digital microscopic images of alkyd resin encapsulated
poly(urea-formaldehyde) (PUF) microcapsules (right), prepared at different agitation rates, (a) 500 rpm,
(b) 400 rpm, and (c) 300 rpm. Adapted from [22], with permission from © 2016 Elsevier.
When the capsules are broken due to the damage in coating, the content of these capsules get out
and a reaction is activated for self-healing procedure. For example, Figure 2 depicts the rupture of UF
microcapsules capsule and release of the reactive epoxy, which acts as a healing agent [12]. The similar
action can be arranged for color change or fluorescence light to be produced after the rupture as a
sign for the damage. Different parameters [28] should to be identified before tailoring the self-healing
coating such as concentrations of containers, concentration of inhibitors, kinetics of additives, diffusion
kinetics and environmental conditions.
Figure 2. Image of ruptured urea–formaldehyde (UF) microcapsules having both reactive epoxy resin
and solvent as the core material. The regions of deposited epoxy film are indicated. Adapted from [12],
with permission from © 2009 Elsevier.
The porous inorganic materials were also widely practiced as healing agent containers. The proper
functionalization of the orifice of mesoporous silica enabled them to act as pH sensitive self-healing
agent containers [29]. The organosilyl-functionalization of mesoporous silica containers was carried
out with ethylenediamine (en), en-4-oxobutanoic acid salt (en-COO–), and en-triacetate (en-(COO–)3 )
with different organic fillings. It was found that en-(COO–)3 -type functionalization with content of
0.23 mmol/g showed better pH stimuli self-healing anticorrosive performance, as the functionalized
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 4 of 17
mesoporous silica have high loading (26 wt %) and release (80%) capacities for the inhibitor and
stoppage of any possible leaking.
The amount of encapsulatable healing agent or anticorrosion agent in inorganic and polymeric
containers is comparatively low. The low amount of healing agent and high manufacturing cost can limit
the commercialization of self-healing technology based on such containers for vehicular applications
in automobiles and aircraft. To overcome this limitation, new anticorrosive layers that contain
core-shell nano- and micro-fibers as healing agent containers were introduced [30]. Electrospinning
can be employed to fabricate networks of core-shell nano- and microfibers that were filled with
sufficient amount of the healing agent. In such an attempt, Lee et al. [30] prepared core-shell nanofiber
coatings on steel substrate with dimethyl siloxane (DMS) as self-healing agent and dimethyl-methyl
hydrogen-siloxane (as curing agent) separately in the cores via the dual emulsion electrospinning
method. DMS and dimethyl-methyl hydrogen-siloxane were both encapsulated in polyacrylonitrile
(PAN) shells. These dual nanofibers were deposited onto a steel substrate. Finally, the nanofiber mats
were intercalated with poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) matrix. The corrosion experiments that were
conducted on the manually damaged nanofiber coating proved the self-healing efficiency and corrosion
resistance of these coatings. Apart from emulsion electrospinning method, co-electrospinning was also
proved to be an efficient method for fabricating encapsulated nanofiber mats [31]. Figure 3 shows a
schematic representation of co-axial electrospinning setup. In co-electrospinning, two syringes were
simultaneously used to electrospin the dimethylvinyl-terminated dimethyl siloxane (resin) encapsulated
PAN and methylhydrogen dimethyl siloxane (curing agent) encapsulated PAN nanofibers, which were
collected together by a drum to get intertwined nanofiber mat. This nanofiber mat embedded
transparent PDMS coating over steel surface efficiently acted as a corrosion barrier via the healing
process by the release of the resin monomer from the fiber cores to heal the corrosion.
studied by many authors [35–37], where corrosion protection can be achieved by the adsorption of
organic compounds on the metal surface through constituent polar function groups. Henna leaves
extract (HLE) has good protection ability over corrosion. It was reported that HLE with acrylic coating
(0.2 wt/vol%) achieved good protection due to the formation of a barrier, nevertheless the resin coating
fails with the increase in temperature due to the formation of ionic conducting paths. These conducting
routes are formed due to the thermal expansion [37].
Many researchers used different types of oils, such as tung oil [38,39], linseed oils [40–44], neem
oil [45], and sunflower oil [46], as greener corrosion inhibitors. These natural oils oxidase with
atmospheric oxygen and a film of polymerized dried oils are formed for further protection of the
coating surface. Among these natural oils, tung oil and linseed oil are the most practiced self-healing
agents due to their better drying performance and the ability of emulsification and cross-linking.
Similarly, green alternatives for nanocontainers have been investigated, such as chitosan [47]
and cellulose nanofibers [48,49] and different type of naturally occurring clay minerals, including
halloysite nanotubes [50], Attapulgite [51], etc. Zheludkevich et al. [47] successfully developed a
pre-layer of cerium-doped chitosan that acts as reservoir for corrosion inhibitor for the aluminum alloy
2024 substrate. A complex is formed between the cerium cations and the chitosan. This complex was
reported to be responsible for the immobilization and release of the corrosion inhibitor. The mechanism
of immobilization and release of self-healing agent in cellulose nanofiber was slightly different from
that of chitosan. Vijayan et al. [49] reported that epoxy monomer and amine curing agent were both
immobilized on cellulose nanofibers and incorporated to epoxy coating on carbon steel substrate. While
epoxy monomer adhered on the surface of cellulose nanofibers, the amine curing agent chemically
bonded with fibers. Up on the surface damage, the nanofibers made contact with the water and
deformed to release the epoxy monomer, which subsequently reacted with the active functional group
in curing agents to recover the damage. The coating based on cellulose nanofibers are proved to be
suitable for sea water applications, as these nanofibers become deformed upon contact with water,
thereby releasing the adhered corrosion inhibitors into the damaged area. Dong et al. [52] made use
the pH-dependent electrostatic interactions between L-valine and halloysite nanotubes to manufacture
smart anti-corrosive coating. The shuttling of charge in L-valine between acidic and basic pH has been
utilized for the pH based release of L-valine from HNT lumen.
Figure 4 shows the green components used in developing green coatings.
of healing materials [53], which are important parameters in defining good microcapsules within
the coating. Li et al. [53] reported the production of graphene oxide (GO) microcapsules with thin
shells thickness of nanometers. The healing material was linseed oil. There was a good compatibility
between GO and polyurethane (PU) matrix due to the presence of functional groups on the shell.
The production of these mechanically stable microcapsules is easy through th self-assembly of GO
sheets. 10 wt% of this microcapsules in waterborne PU coatings was found to heal a scratch with
20 µm in width on hot-dip galvanized steel surfaces. In another technique, graphene oxide/polysterene
(GO/PS) containers were produced with 8-HQ inhibitors [54]. The authors controlled the size of the
containers from 700 nm to 35 µm. The produced powders can be used in epoxy coatings over mild steel
as low cost self-healing anticorrosion materials. Alternatively, Fan et al. [55] used a multilayer structure
of GO with branched poly(ethylene mine) (PEI)/ poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) to protect magnesium
alloy. In this case, GO acted as both the barrier layer and the multilayers for self-healing. Very
recently, Wang et al. used graphene oxide based hybrid structures as healing agent containers [56].
They fabricated graphene oxide-mesoporous silicon dioxide layer–nanosphere structure full with
tannic acid healing agent (Figure 5). Such a coating was proven to be effective protection of metal
parts used in submarine vehicles from alternating hydrostatic pressure (AHP). Similarly, another
research group used graphene oxide@phosphate intercalated hydrotalcite to impart self-healing ability
to waterborne epoxy coating [57]. The self-healing ability of graphene oxide@phosphate intercalated
hydrotalcite came from the ion exchange between PO4 3− and Cl− on metal-coating interface.
Similarly, multicore microcapsules were experimented. These materials provided the dual action
of self-healing and anticorrosion [59]. The authors showed that the microencapsulation of both
corrosion inhibitors and linseed oil in multicore phenol formaldehyde shells could provide successful
self-healing anticorrosive coating over polyurethane paint.
Over the last decade, polydopamine has emerged as a versatile material for functionalizing
surfaces [60]. Qian et al. [61] developed a new self-healing coating by using polydopamine
(PDA) as a pH-sensitive protector for inhibitor loaded in mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs),
which overcame the limitation of spontaneous flow of inhibitors molecules from mesopores.
The designed PDA-decorated corrosion inhibitor loaded MSNs nanocontainers was used to prepare
self-healing water-borne alkyd coatings on mild steel. Benzotriazole, used as a corrosion inhibitor,
was loaded at neutral pH, and it facilitated fast release in acidic pH. PDA functioned to govern the
discharge of inhibitors and form protective complexes with corrosion products.
Smart containers tailored to specific actions can be used as self-healing materials. For example,
containers that respond to light stimulation function in a more controlled manner when compared
with those respond to other stimuli, such as pH or temperature, can be produced. Chen et al. [20]
developed a reversible light triggered self-healing water-born alkyd coating over aluminium alloy,
by incorporating azobenzene- modified hollow mesoporous silica nanocontainers. Upon ultraviolet
(UV) irradiation, azobenzene had reversible trans-cis isomerization associated with the decrease in
the size of trans to cis isomers, which resulted in expelling molecules out of the nanocontainers
to the corrosion site. Upon exposure to visible light, the trans isomer transformed to cis isomer,
which prevented the release of corrosion inhibitor. In this way, it is possible to avoid the extra discharge
of the inhibitors after healing the corroded area.
Figure 7. Photographs of steel panel coated with (a) 10 wt.% hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI)
microcapsule incorporated coating and (b) pure coating after accelerated salt immersion test for two
days followed by storage at room temperature for six months. Adapted from [62], with permission
from © 2014 Elsevier.
One of the popular representation methods of EIS result is the Bode plot, where log frequency is
plotted against both the absolute values of the impedance (|Z| = Z0 ) and the phase-shift. Bode plot
for the coated metal surface with a defect is primarily used to probe the self-healing phenomena.
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 9 of 17
Upon creating an artificial defect on the coating surface, the impedance at low frequencies gets suddenly
dropped due to the failure of the oxide film and the start of the corrosion process. Once the healing
of the defect starts, the impedance recovers its initial values. For instance, Zheludkevich et al. [64]
analyzed the Bode plot to follow the self-healing performance of a corrosion inhibitor doped hybrid
so-gel coating on aluminium alloy (Figure 9). 8-hydroxyquinoline is used as a corrosion inhibitor in
this coating. The authors found that the initially dropped impedance values retrieved the initial value
after a short period of 20 min. (Figure 9a). However, continuously decreased low frequency impedance
values of undoped single-layer sol–gel coating indicated coating failure without recovery (Figure 9b).
Figure 9. EIS plots of (a) inhibitor doped double-layer sol-gel film and (b) undoped single-layer sol–gel
film during immersion in 0.5 NaCl. Adapted from [64], with permission from © 2007 Elsevier.
The time that is required to initialize the healing process is an important parameter in judging
a self-healing coating. EIS gives evidence of this self-recovery time. The EIS investigation on epoxy
coating with epoxy microcapsules applied on carbon steel revealed that the coating was able to heal
within 4 h (Figure 10) [14]. This confirmed the microcapsules that were immediately released the
healing agent as the cracks propagated through the coating.
An alternative method for quantifying the self-healing process is to fit the EIS data with an
equivalent circuit while using data analysis. This method provides some more knowledge regarding
the self-healing performance of the coated layers by assigning the impedance spectra to the components
of the circuit [62]. The change of components of the equivalent circuits, such as healing resistance
(Rhealing ) and healing capacitance (Chealing ) with immersion time, gives direct information about the
self-healing process. Hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) filled polyurethane microcapsules containing
epoxy coating on steel substrate was evaluated for its self-healing performance by fitting the EIS plots
with equivalent circuit [62] (Figure 11a). The equivalent circuit of the scratched HDI filled microcapsule
containing self-healing coating in EIS measurement is shown in Figure 11b. The value of Rhealing
increases with the immersion time (Figure 11c), which reflects the self-repairing of coating surface.
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 10 of 17
Figure 10. EIS Bode plots of epoxy coatings containing 20% microcapsule during immersion in 12 wt.%
NaCl solution at different time intervals. Adapted from [14], with permission from © 2012 Elsevier.
Figure 11. (a) Bode plots and fitted curves (solid line) of scratched epoxy coating with HDI filled PU
after 8 h of immersion in 1 M NaCl solution, corresponding (b) equivalent circuit in EIS measurement
and (c) healing resistances (Rhealing ) versus immersion time plot. Adapted from [62], with permission
from © 2014 Elsevier.
Figure 12. Electrochemical cell setup for scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) experiments.
Adapted from [65], with permission from © 2017 Electrochemical Society, Inc.
SVET was used to follow the self-repairing in epoxy coating containing corrosion inhibitor doped
microgel on aluminum substrate by Latnikova et al. [66]. A maximum increase in current density
recorded after 12 h of immersion in SVET current density map confirmed an intense corrosion on
control epoxy coating, as shown in Figure 13a–c. At the same time, the epoxy coating containing 5 wt%
of corrosion inhibitor doped microgel particles showed no signs of corrosion, indicating the continuous
release of 2-methylbenzothiazole (MeBT) from microgel in to the damaged area (Figure 13d–f).
Figure 13. The current density distribution above scratched aluminium substrates covered with (a–c)
control epoxy coating and (d–f) epoxy coating modified with 5 wt% of MeBT doped microgel particles:
a,d—0 h of immersion, b,e—6 h of immersion, c,f—12 h of immersion in 0.1MNaCl solution. Adapted
from [66], with permission from © 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry.
SVET has been successfully used to follow the self-healing process in polyelectrolyte multilayer
coating containing an inhibitor on aluminum plates [33]. The current density maps of this polyelectrolyte
based coating were compared with that of the SiOx /ZrOx sol-gel coating. The current density map of Al
surface coated with sol-gel film showed increasing anodic activity with the immersion time ultimately
ending up in total failure of metal surface. However, an extremely different behavior was shown by
inhibitor loaded polyelectrolyte coated Al alloy surface as neither anodic activity nor corrosion product
was observed until 16 h of immersion.
chemical changes by detecting the ionic species involved in the corrosion process, which is unable to be
provided with SVET. Latest literatures report the use of both redox competition mode and a combined
redox-competition and negative-feedback mode to monitor healing process. González-García et al. [69]
monitored the self-healing phenomena in epoxy coating embedded with capsules containing silyl-ester
on aluminum alloys with the help of SECM. They opted a combined mode in SECM that was clearly
able to distinguish the oxygen behavior as an active component in the cathodic processes and as
a mediator. Figure 14 shows SECM profile of the transition area on aluminum alloy surface with
control coating and silyl-treated coating upon immersion in salt solution. The average plateau of
more negative current that was observed on silylester-area indicates the absence of cathodic activity.
The silyl-ester that was released from capsules regenerates the uniform surface layer to protect the
metal from corrosion and consequently more oxygen is available in immersion medium.
Figure 14. Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) profile of the transition area on aluminium
Alloy with control and silyl-treated coatings immersed in 0.05 M NaCl solution for 1 day. Adapted
from [69], with permission from © 2011 Elsevier.
Table 1. Different type of self-healing coating, key characteristics, and potential application.
5. Conclusions
New generation of self-healing protective coatings confirmed their candidature as alternative
anti-corrosion coatings. The current review gave a concise discussion on the latest self-healing strategies
that were adopted in protective coating technology. Greener coatings avoid the use of solvents and
volatile organic coating. The emerging green synthetic approach, role of graphene family members and
polydopamine in self-healing coating technology were discussed. We explained both the conventional
and advanced techniques that were used to follow the self-healing process in coatings. We also
discussed the use of specific new techniques, such as SVET and SECM, in detecting and following
the self-healing phenomenon in protective coatings need to be explored more in future. As intensive
research is progressing in this field, multifunctional self-healing coatings will be the future of coating
technology in marine, aeronautical, and oil and gas industries. The new modified surfaces can offer
reduced production cost and prolonged service life.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, P.V.P and M.A.-M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.V.P and
M.A.-M.; Editing, P.V.P and M.A.-M.; Supervision, M.A.-M.; Funding Acquisition, M.A.-M.
Funding: The continuous support from Qatar University is appreciated.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Nace-International-Report.pdf. Available online: http://impact.nace.org/documents/Nace-International-
Report.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2019).
2. Grundmeier, G.; Simões, A. Corrosion protection by organic coatings. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.
wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527610426.bard040504 (accessed on 1 August 2019).
3. Taylor, S.R. 22—The role of intrinsic defects in the protective behavior of organic coatings. In Handbook of
Environmental Degradation of Materials, 2nd ed.; Kutz, M., Ed.; William Andrew Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2012;
pp. 655–672, ISBN 978-1-4377-3455-3.
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 14 of 17
4. Balaskas, A.C.; Kartsonakis, I.A.; Tziveleka, L.A.; Kordas, G.C. Improvement of anti-corrosive properties of
epoxy-coated AA 2024-T3 with TiO2 nanocontainers loaded with 8-hydroxyquinoline. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012,
74, 418–426. [CrossRef]
5. Chou, T.P.; Chandrasekaran, C.; Limmer, S.J.; Seraji, S.; Wu, Y.; Forbess, M.J.; Nguyen, C.; Cao, G.Z.
Organic–inorganic hybrid coatings for corrosion protection. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2001, 290, 153–162.
[CrossRef]
6. Poznyak, S.K.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Raps, D.; Gammel, F.; Yasakau, K.A.; Ferreira, M.G.S. Preparation and
corrosion protective properties of nanostructured titania-containing hybrid sol–gel coatings on AA2024.
Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 62, 226–235. [CrossRef]
7. Cui, X.; Zhu, G.; Pan, Y.; Shao, Q.; Zhao, C.; Dong, M.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z. Polydimethylsiloxane-titania
nanocomposite coating: Fabrication and corrosion resistance. Polymer 2018, 138, 203–210. [CrossRef]
8. Wool, R.P. Self-healing materials: A review. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 400–418. [CrossRef]
9. Kuhl, N.; Bode, S.; Hager, M.D.; Schubert, U.S. Self-healing polymers based on reversible covalent bonds.
In Self-Healing Materials; Hager, M.D., van der Zwaag, S., Schubert, U.S., Eds.; Advances in Polymer Science;
Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzeland, 2016; pp. 1–58. ISBN 978-3-319-32778-5.
10. Zhu, D.Y.; Rong, M.Z.; Zhang, M.Q. Self-healing polymeric materials based on microencapsulated healing
agents: From design to preparation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 49–50, 175–220. [CrossRef]
11. Toohey, K.S.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R. Characterization of microvascular-based self-healing coatings.
Exp. Mech. 2009, 49, 707–717. [CrossRef]
12. Blaiszik, B.J.; Caruso, M.M.; McIlroy, D.A.; Moore, J.S.; White, S.R.; Sottos, N.R. Microcapsules filled with
reactive solutions for self-healing materials. Polymer 2009, 50, 990–997. [CrossRef]
13. Liao, L.; Zhang, W.; Xin, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Li, W. Preparation and characterization of microcapsule
containing epoxy resin and its self-healing performance of anticorrosion covering material. Chin. Sci. Bull.
2011, 56, 439–443. [CrossRef]
14. Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S. Preparation of epoxy microcapsule based self-healing
coatings and their behavior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 4976–4980. [CrossRef]
15. Maia, F.; Tedim, J.; Lisenkov, A.D.; Salak, A.N.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Ferreira, M.G.S. Silica nanocontainers
for active corrosion protection. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 1287–1298. [CrossRef]
16. Kartsonakis, I.A.; Balaskas, A.C.; Koumoulos, E.P.; Charitidis, C.A.; Kordas, G.C. Incorporation of ceramic
nanocontainers into epoxy coatings for the corrosion protection of hot dip galvanized steel. Corros. Sci. 2012,
57, 30–41. [CrossRef]
17. Arunchandran, C.; Ramya, S.; George, R.P.; Mudali, U.K. Self-healing corrosion resistive coatings based on
inhibitor loaded TiO2 nanocontainers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, C552–C559. [CrossRef]
18. Lamaka, S.V.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Yasakau, K.A.; Serra, R.; Poznyak, S.K.; Ferreira, M.G.S. Nanoporous
titania interlayer as reservoir of corrosion inhibitors for coatings with self-healing ability. Prog. Org. Coat.
2007, 58, 127–135. [CrossRef]
19. Wang, H.; Gan, M.; Ma, L.; Zhou, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Dai, W.; Sun, X. Synthesis of polyaniline-modified
mesoporous-silica containers for anticorrosion coatings via in-situ polymerization and surface-protected
etching. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 929–937. [CrossRef]
20. Chen, T.; Chen, R.; Jin, Z.; Liu, J. Engineering hollow mesoporous silica nanocontainers with molecular
switches for continuous self-healing anticorrosion coating. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 9510–9516. [CrossRef]
21. Poornima, P.V.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.S.A. TiO2 nanotubes and mesoporous silica as containers in self-healing
epoxy coatings. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38812.
22. Shahabudin, N.; Yahya, R.; Gan, S.N. Microcapsules of poly (urea-formaldehyde) (PUF) containing alkyd
from palm oil. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, S88–S95. [CrossRef]
23. Fayyad, E.M.; Almaadeed, M.A.; Jones, A.; Abdullah, A.M. Evaluation techniques for the corrosion resistance
of self-healing coatings. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2014, 9, 23.
24. Encapsulation of Tung Oil for Self-Healing Coatings in Corrosion: Ingenta Connect. Available online: https://
www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asp/sam/2015/00000007/00000012/art00019 (accessed on 29 May 2019).
25. Fayyad, E.M.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Ponnamma, D.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.A. Oleic acid-grafted chitosan/graphene
oxide composite coating for corrosion protection of carbon steel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 871–878.
[CrossRef]
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 15 of 17
26. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liao, L.; Wang, S.; Li, W. Self-healing coatings containing microcapsule. Appl. Surf. Sci.
2012, 258, 1915–1918. [CrossRef]
27. Rule, J.D.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R. Effect of microcapsule size on the performance of self-healing polymers.
Polymer 2007, 48, 3520–3529. [CrossRef]
28. Zheludkevich, M.L.; Hughes, A.E. Delivery systems for self healing protective coatings. In Active Protective
Coatings: New-Generation Coatings for Metals; Hughes, A.E., Mol, J.M.C., Zheludkevich, M.L., Buchheit, R.G.,
Eds.; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 157–199,
ISBN 978-94-017-7540-3.
29. Zheng, Z.; Schenderlein, M.; Huang, X.; Brownbill, N.J.; Blanc, F.; Shchukin, D. Influence of functionalization
of nanocontainers on self-healing anticorrosive coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22756–22766.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Lee, M.W.; An, S.; Lee, C.; Liou, M.; Yarin, A.L.; Yoon, S.S. Self-healing transparent core-shell nanofiber
coatings for anti-corrosive protection. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7045–7053. [CrossRef]
31. An, S.; Liou, M.; Song, K.Y.; Jo, H.S.; Lee, M.W.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Yarin, A.L.; Yoon, S.S. Highly flexible
transparent self-healing composite based on electrospun core-shell nanofibers produced by coaxial
electrospinning for anti-corrosion and electrical insulation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 17778–17785. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
32. Grigoriev, D.O.; Köhler, K.; Skorb, E.; Shchukin, D.G.; Möhwald, H. Polyelectrolyte complexes as a “smart”
depot for self-healing anticorrosion coatings. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 1426–1432. [CrossRef]
33. Andreeva, D.V.; Fix, D.; Möhwald, H.; Shchukin, D.G. Self-healing anticorrosion coatings based on
pH-sensitive polyelectrolyte/inhibitor sandwichlike nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2789–2794.
[CrossRef]
34. Patni, N.; Agarwal, S.; Shah, P. Greener Approach towards Corrosion Inhibition. Available online: https:
//www.hindawi.com/journals/cje/2013/784186/abs/ (accessed on 29 May 2019).
35. OnePetro. The Use of Tobacco Extracts as Corrosion Inhibitors. Available online: https://www.onepetro.org/
conference-paper/NACE-01558 (accessed on 29 May 2019).
36. Odoemelam, S.A.; Eddy, N.O. Inhibition of corrosion of mild steel in acidic medium using ethanol extract of
Aloe vera. Pigment. Resin Technol. 2009, 38, 111–115.
37. Zulkifli, F.; Ali, N.; Yusof, M.S.M.; Isa, M.I.N.; Yabuki, A.; Wan Nik, W.B. Henna leaves extract as a corrosion
inhibitor in acrylic resin coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 105, 310–319. [CrossRef]
38. Samadzadeh, M.; Boura, S.H.; Peikari, M.; Ashrafi, A.; Kasiriha, M. Tung oil: An autonomous repairing agent
for self-healing epoxy coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2011, 70, 383–387. [CrossRef]
39. Li, H.; Cui, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H. Fabrication of microcapsules containing dual-functional tung oil
and properties suitable for self-healing and self-lubricating coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 115, 164–171.
[CrossRef]
40. Suryanarayana, C.; Rao, K.C.; Kumar, D. Preparation and characterization of microcapsules containing
linseed oil and its use in self-healing coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 63, 72–78. [CrossRef]
41. Wang, H.; Zhou, Q. Evaluation and failure analysis of linseed oil encapsulated self-healing anticorrosive
coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 118, 108–115. [CrossRef]
42. Mahmoudian, M.; Nozad, E.; Kochameshki, M.G.; Enayati, M. Preparation and investigation of hybrid
self-healing coatings containing linseed oil loaded nanocapsules, potassium ethyl xanthate and benzotriazole
on copper surface. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 120, 167–178. [CrossRef]
43. Kurt Çömlekçi, G.; Ulutan, S. Encapsulation of linseed oil and linseed oil based alkyd resin by urea
formaldehyde shell for self-healing systems. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 121, 190–200. [CrossRef]
44. Abdipour, H.; Rezaei, M.; Abbasi, F. Synthesis and characterization of high durable linseed oil-urea
formaldehyde micro/nanocapsules and their self-healing behaviour in epoxy coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018,
124, 200–212. [CrossRef]
45. Bagale, U.D.; Sonawane, S.H.; Bhanvase, B.A.; Kulkarni, R.D.; Gogate, P.R. Green synthesis of nanocapsules
for self-healing anticorrosion coating using ultrasound-assisted approach. Green Process. Synth. 2018, 7,
147–159. [CrossRef]
46. Baharom, Z.; Baba, N.B.; Ramli, R.; Idris, M.I.; Abdullah, H.Z. Microencapsulation of natural self-healing
agent as corrosion coating. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2068, 020103.
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 16 of 17
47. Zheludkevich, M.L.; Tedim, J.; Freire, C.S.R.; Fernandes, S.C.M.; Kallip, S.; Lisenkov, A.; Gandini, A.;
Ferreira, M.G.S. Self-healing protective coatings with “green” chitosan based pre-layer reservoir of corrosion
inhibitor. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 4805–4812. [CrossRef]
48. Yabuki, A.; Shiraiwa, T.; Fathona, I.W. pH-controlled self-healing polymer coatings with cellulose nanofibers
providing an effective release of corrosion inhibitor. Corros. Sci. 2016, 103, 117–123. [CrossRef]
49. Vijayan, P.P.; Tanvir, A.; El-Gawady, Y.H.; Al-Maadeed, M. Cellulose nanofibers to assist the release of healing
agents in epoxy coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 112, 127–132. [CrossRef]
50. Vijayan, P.P.; Hany El-Gawady, Y.M.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.S.A. Halloysite nanotube as multifunctional
component in epoxy protective coating. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 11186–11192. [CrossRef]
51. Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Hou, P.; Pan, J.; Zhao, X.; Hou, B. Preparation and characterization of
polyelectrolyte-modified attapulgite as nanocontainers for protection of carbon steel. J. Electrochem. Soc.
2018, 165, C907–C915. [CrossRef]
52. Dong, C.; Zhang, M.; Xiang, T.; Yang, L.; Chan, W.; Li, C. Novel self-healing anticorrosion coating based on
L-valine and MBT-loaded halloysite nanotubes. J. Mater. Sci 2018, 53, 7793–7808. [CrossRef]
53. Li, J.; Feng, Q.; Cui, J.; Yuan, Q.; Qiu, H.; Gao, S.; Yang, J. Self-assembled graphene oxide microcapsules in
Pickering emulsions for self-healing waterborne polyurethane coatings. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 151,
282–290. [CrossRef]
54. Daradmare, S.; Pradhan, M.; Raja, V.S.; Parida, S. Encapsulating 8-hydroxyquinoline in graphene
oxide-stabilized polystyrene containers and its anticorrosion performance. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 10262–10277.
[CrossRef]
55. Fan, F.; Zhou, C.; Wang, X.; Szpunar, J. Layer-by-layer assembly of a self-healing anticorrosion coating on
magnesium alloys. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27271–27278. [CrossRef]
56. Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Xiong, C.; Song, L.; Ding, R.; Han, P.; Li, W. Self-healing performance
and corrosion resistance of graphene oxide–mesoporous silicon layer–nanosphere structure coating under
marine alternating hydrostatic pressure. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 792–804. [CrossRef]
57. Chen, C.; He, Y.; Xiao, G.; Zhong, F.; Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Chen, J. Synergistic effect of graphene
oxide@phosphate-intercalated hydrotalcite for improved anti-corrosion and self-healable protection of
waterborne epoxy coating in salt environments. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 2318–2326. [CrossRef]
58. Sun, D.; Zhang, H.; Tang, X.Z.; Yang, J. Water resistant reactive microcapsules for self-healing coatings in
harsh environments. Polymer 2016, 91, 33–40. [CrossRef]
59. Jadhav, R.S.; Mane, V.; Bagle, A.V.; Hundiwale, D.G.; Mahulikar, P.P.; Waghoo, G. Synthesis of multicore
phenol formaldehyde microcapsules and their application in polyurethane paint formulation for self-healing
anticorrosive coating. Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2013, 4, 31. [CrossRef]
60. Ryu, J.H.; Messersmith, P.B.; Lee, H. Polydopamine surface chemistry: A decade of discovery. ACS Appl.
Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7523–7540. [CrossRef]
61. Qian, B.; Zheng, Z.; Michailids, M.; Fleck, N.; Bilton, M.; Song, Y.; Li, G.; Shchukin, D. Mussel-inspired
self-healing coatings based on polydopamine-coated nanocontainers for corrosion protection. ACS Appl.
Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 10283–10291. [CrossRef]
62. Huang, M.; Yang, J. Salt spray and EIS studies on HDI microcapsule-based self-healing anticorrosive coatings.
Prog. Org. Coat. 2014, 77, 168–175. [CrossRef]
63. Mansfeld, F.; Tsai, C.H. Determination of coating deterioration with EIS: I. basic relationships. Corrosion 1991,
47, 958–963. [CrossRef]
64. Zheludkevich, M.L.; Yasakau, K.A.; Bastos, A.C.; Karavai, O.V.; Ferreira, M.G.S. On the application
of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to study the self-healing properties of protective coatings.
Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 2622–2628. [CrossRef]
65. Bastos, A.C.; Quevedo, M.C.; Karavai, O.V.; Ferreira, M.G.S. Review—On the application of the scanning
vibrating electrode technique (SVET) to corrosion research. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, C973–C990.
[CrossRef]
66. Latnikova, A.; Grigoriev, D.; Schenderlein, M.; Möhwald, H.; Shchukin, D. A new approach towards “active”
self-healing coatings: Exploitation of microgels. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 10837–10844. [CrossRef]
67. González-García, Y.; Mol, J.M.C.; Muselle, T.; De Graeve, I.; van Assche, G.; Scheltjens, G.; van Mele, B.;
Terryn, H. SECM study of defect repair in self-healing polymer coatings on metals. Electrochem. Commun.
2011, 13, 169–173. [CrossRef]
Materials 2019, 12, 2754 17 of 17
68. Fan, F.R.F.; Liu, B.; Mauzeroll, J. 12—Scanning electrochemical microscopy. In Handbook of Electrochemistry;
Zoski, C.G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 471–540. ISBN 978-0-444-51958-0.
69. González-García, Y.; García, S.J.; Hughes, A.E.; Mol, J.M.C. A combined redox-competition and
negative-feedback SECM study of self-healing anticorrosive coatings. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13,
1094–1097. [CrossRef]
70. Sitnikov, N.N.; Khabibullina, I.A.; Mashchenko, V.I.; Rizakhanov, R.N. Prospects of application of self-healing
materials and technologies based on them. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2018, 9, 785–793. [CrossRef]
71. Song, Y.K.; Jo, Y.H.; Lim, Y.J.; Cho, S.Y.; Yu, H.C.; Ryu, B.C.; Lee, S.I.; Chung, C.M. Sunlight-induced
self-healing of a microcapsule-type protective coating. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1378–1384.
[CrossRef]
72. Liu, C.; Ma, C.; Xie, Q.; Zhang, G. Self-repairing silicone coatings for marine anti-biofouling. J. Mater. Chem.
A 2017, 5, 15855–15861. [CrossRef]
73. Zhao, R.; Chen, Y.; Liu, G.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, K. Fabrication of self-healing waterbased superhydrophobic
coatings from POSS modified silica nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2018, 229, 281–285. [CrossRef]
74. Montemor, M.F.; Snihirova, D.V.; Taryba, M.G.; Lamaka, S.V.; Kartsonakis, I.A.; Balaskas, A.C.; Kordas, G.C.;
Tedim, J.; Kuznetsova, A.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; et al. Evaluation of self-healing ability in protective coatings
modified with combinations of layered double hydroxides and cerium molibdate nanocontainers filled with
corrosion inhibitors. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 60, 31–40. [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).