3-Production Oil From Waste Plastics
3-Production Oil From Waste Plastics
Name of Project:
PRODUCTION OIL
FROM
WASTE PLASTICS
By
Supervised by :
1
Abstract
The Purpose of this Project is to Produce Oil from Waste-Plastics by
using (Catalytic Pyrolysis). Waste Plastics which are organic
substances have large impact on environment due to their non-
biodegradability, can be transformed into liquid and gaseous fuel for
internal combustion engine and boilers. In this Project, plastic wastes
(polyethylene ; PE) were used for the pyrolysis to get fuel oil that has
the same physical properties as the fuels like Gasoline, kerosene, and
diesel. First of all the oil produced can be used as a fuel for domestic
purposes and also in vehicles and industries when further refined.
Secondly the various types of pollution caused due to waste plastics can
be minimized. Plastic in the first place is manufactured from natural gas
specifically from ethane which is a constituent of natural gas. Therefore
the waste plastic can be converted back into it. The Plant Capacity is ;
(5000 Kg/hr of LDPE) . The work on our project includes the
completion of the following parts: Chapter one (Introduction), Chapter
two (Production Methods), Chapter three (Material Balance), Chapter
four (Energy Balance).
2
3
Nomenclature
1-
4
Contents page
- Uses ……………………………………………..………20
3- Chapter Three :-
" Material Balance " …………………….…...27
4- Chapter Four :-
" Energy Balance " ……………………….....39
5- Chapter Five :-
" Equipment Design " …………………….....54
5
6- Chapter Six :-
" Mechanical Design " ……………………...94
7- References …………………………………………...…...122
6
7
Chapter One ; ( Introduction )
8
Many types of consumed plastic are available in our surroundings,
preferably those wastes are converted into liquid fuels. Mixed wastes used were
high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE),
polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene-terephthalate (PET). The
pyrolysis processes were carried out with fixed bed reactor. Natural catalyst such
as Shwedaung clay, Mabisan clay, Bentonite clay, Dolomite and synthetic
catalyst, zinc oxide, were used as catalyst for pyrolysis of mixed plastic wastes.
Pyrolysis which falls into the category of chemical recycling process is an
endothermic, irreversible, high temperature phenomenon which transforms
organic material into its smaller constituents. Catalytic pyrolysis which represents
an area of intense scientific and technological research has a great potential to
absorb large volume of plastic waste [1,2].
Today, plastics materials are very frequent in daily life and provide a
fundamental contribution to our society. The typical distribution of household
plastics as a part of the overall solid waste stream is: polyolefins 66.9%,
polystyrene 13.3%, PVC 10.3%, PET 5.3% and others 4.2%. Waste plastic ends
its lifetime as municipal solid waste on the land fill. Over the world plastic waste
9
has continuously grown in the last decades. Disposal of waste plastics causes
serious environmental problems. Thus, plastic waste recycling has been a focus
of many researchers in the past few decades. Pyrolysis appears to be promising
technic of conversion of solid wastes plastic (SWP) to more usable materials such
as gas fuel and/or fuel oil or to high value feedstock for the chemical industry.
Thermal pyrolysis of plastic materials leads to a wide product distribution and
requires high degradation temperatures. During the cracking process of long
polymer molecules the degradation of polymer chains can be enhanced by
applying of various catalysts. The catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes gives
valuable products similar to diesel and gasoline. The most frequently used
catalysts are zeolites and mesoporous materials because of their porous structure
and acid properties. In the case of the polyolefin catalytic cracking like PE and PP
a number of acid porous solids, such as amorphous silica-alumina, zeolites and
ordered mesoporous materials, have been used as catalysts [3].
Plastic were invented in 1860, but have only been widely used in the last 30 years
plastic are light, durable, modifiable and hygienic. Plastic are made of long chain
of molecule called Polymers. Polymers are made when naturally occurring
substance such as crude oil or petroleum are transformed into other substance with
completely different properties. These polymers can then be made into granules,
powders and liquids, becoming raw materials for plastic products [4].
10
11
Chapter Two ; ( Literature Survey )
2.1- Definition:-
Waste Plastics which are organic substances have large impact on
environment due to their non-biodegradability, can be transformed into liquid and
gaseous fuel for internal combustion engine, boiler, fuel cells etc. There are
different plastic waste management techniques exist such as land filling, direct
burning (incineration), mechanical recycling and chemical recycling. Chemical
recycling is the most attractive method in accordance with principle of sustainable
development, and is also called feedstock or tertiary recycling [1].
In this Project, plastic wastes (polyethylene ; PE) were used for the
pyrolysis to get fuel oil that has the same physical properties as the fuels like
Gasoline, diesel etc. The waste plastics are subjected to depolymerization,
pyrolysis, and distillation to obtain different value added fuels such as Gasoline,
kerosene, and diesel, lube oil etc. Thus, the process of converting plastics to fuel
has now turned the problems into an opportunity to make wealth from waste. First
of all the oil produced can be used as a fuel for domestic purposes and also in
vehicles and industries when further refined. Secondly the various types of
pollution caused due to waste plastics can be minimized. Plastic in the first place
is manufactured from natural gas specifically from ethane which is a constituent
of natural gas. Therefore the waste plastic can be converted back into it [1].
13
2.3- Recycling Codes
Table-1; lists the recycling codes currently used in the world today. These
inform the consumer as to the type of polymer they are discarding and enables the
correct recycling of the waste plastic wherever possible [7].
14
2.4 – Polyethylene (PE)
Polyethylene (PE), light, versatile synthetic resin made from the
polymerization of ethylene. Polyethylene is a member of the important family of
polyolefin resins ; It is the most widely used plastic in the world. Ethylene (C2H4)
molecules are essentially composed of two methylene units (CH2) linked together
by a double bond between the carbon atoms—a structure represented by the
formula CH2=CH2. Under the influence of polymerization catalysts, the double
bond can be broken and the resultant extra single bond used to link to a carbon
atom in another ethylene molecule. Thus, made into the repeating unit of a large,
polymeric (multiple-unit) molecule, ethylene has the following chemical structure
[19]
:
LDPE is prepared from gaseous ethylene under very high pressures and
high temperatures in the presence of oxide initiators. These processes yield
a polymer structure with both long and short branches; LDPE is a very flexible
material. Its melting point is approximately 110 °C (230 °F). Principal uses are in
packaging film, trash and grocery bags, agricultural mulch, wire and cable
insulation, squeeze bottles, toys, and housewares. The plastic recycling code of
LDPE is #4 [19].
15
2.5 - Physical Properties
1) For several commercially available plastics
Physical data for several commercially available plastics are summarized
in Table -2 [8].
17
2.6- Sources of Plastic Wastes
Plastic wastes (normally remain a part of solid wastes as they are discarded
and collected a household wastes. The various sources of plastics includes
domestic items (food containers, milk covers, water bottles, packaging foam,
disposable cups, plates, cutlery, CD and cassette boxes. fridge liners, vending
cups, electronic equipment cases, drainage pipe, carbonated drinks bottles,
plumbing pipes and guttering, flooring. cushioning foams, thermal insulation
foams, surface coatings, etc.), agricultural (mulch films, feed bags, fertilizer bags,
and in temporary tarpaulin-like uses such as covers for hay, silage, etc.), wire and
cable, automobile wrecking, etc. Industrial plastic wastes are those arising from
the large plastics manufacturing, processing and packaging industry. The
industrial waste plastic mainly constitute plastics from construction and
demolition companies (e.g. polyvinylchloride pipes and fittings, tiles and sheets)
electrical and electronics industries (e.g. switch boxes, cable sheaths, cassette
boxes, TV screens, etc.) and the automotive industries spare-parts for cars, such
as fan blades, seat coverings, battery containers and front grills). Most of the
industrial plastic waste has relatively well physical characteristics i.e. they are
sufficiently clean and free of contamination and are available in fairly large
quantities [4].
The types of the waste plastics are LDPE, HDPE, PP, PS, and PVC. The
problems of waste plastics can‘t be solved by landfilling or incineration, because
the safety deposits are expensive and incineration stimulates the growing emission
of harmful greenhouse gases like COx, NOx, SOx and etc. These types of disposal
of the waste plastics release toxic gas which has negative impact on environment.
Plastic wastes can also classified as industrial and municipal plastic wastes
according to their origins, these groups have different qualities and properties and
are subjected to different management strategies. Plastic wastes represent a
considerable part of municipal wastes furthermore huge amounts of plastic waste
arise as a by-product or faulty product in industry and agriculture. The total plastic
waste, over 78% weight of this total corresponds to thermoplastics and the
remaining to thermosets. Thermoplastics are composed of polyolefins such as
polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride and can be
recycled. On the other hand thermosets mainly include epoxy resins and
polyurethanes and cannot be recycled [4].
18
In 2015, there were 146 million tons packaging plastic which took about
one third of the total plastic products. And in the same year, among all the plastic
wastes, 141 million tons were packaging plastics. For other sectors except
building and construction section, there is a little difference on quantity between
production and their wastes. For the plastic wastes of building and construction,
they only take up about 20% of the products of building and construction which
means the lifetime of those kind of plastics is quite long. However, for most
plastic products especially products like packaging, they are in quite short
lifetime. The details of plastic production are shown in the figure 1, while the
details of plastics wastes are shown in the figure 2 [9].
Plastics are light weight and durability. Plastic wastes can be classified as
industrial and municipal waste plastic according to their origins. They have
different qualities and properties. Waste plastic represents a considerable part of
municipal wastes; furthermore huge amount of waste plastic arise as a byproduct
or faulty product in industry and agriculture. The plastic wastes are mainly two
types of plastics such as thermo plastics and thermosetting plastics. Thermo
plastics are composed of polyolefin such as high density polyethylene (HDPE),
low density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS),
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and can be
recycled. Thermosetting plastics mainly include epoxy resins and polyurethanes
and cannot be recycled. The quantity of thermoplastics found in waste is
increasing corresponding. Nowadays, the largest amount of plastic wastes is
disposed of by land filling, and incineration. So, Environmental pollution
increases day by day in everywhere. Plastic wastes are the main causes of
environmental pollution. There are three ways to management of plastic wastes.
They are land filling, incineration and recycling.
19
2.7- Uses
Recycling and reuse of plastics has obvious benefits of decreasing the
amount of waste plastics that end up in landfills; however, the overall recovery of
plastics for recycling is relatively small. The growing awareness in environmental
concerns and the reducing landfill space have prompted research in alternative
methods such as chemical recycling. Chemical or feedstock recycling involves
processes that convert plastic waste into petroleum feedstock, preferably gasoline
range fuel. Although a viable option, this method can be costly. Contributing to
the high costs is the fact that waste plastics are indeed mixtures of different
materials having different compositions and thus requiring different processing
conditions. Moreover, the chemical recycling (or cracking) of plastics has to be
combined with other technologies, such as categorization and pretreatment at the
upstream end, as well as various separations and product recovery processes on
the downstream end [11].
Conveyor guides
Chute liners
Chemical holding tanks
Food processing parts
Medical equipment
Packaging applications
Conveyor wear strips (HDPE)
Piping systems (HDPE)
Liquid dispensing equipment (HDPE)
Marine components (HDPE)
2) Pyrolysis is also classified as the chemical and energy recovery system known
as cracking, gasification and chemolysis methods [12].
4) plastic waste is now one of the major components of municipal solid waste.
The challenge of dealing with plastic waste has been managed by a number of
different methods depending on local regulations and what is socially acceptable,
including recycling, reuse, disposal at landfill and conversion to energy by
pyrolysis.
The plastic wastes are mainly two types of plastics such as thermo plastics
and thermosetting plastics. Thermo plastics are composed of polyolefin such as
high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE.
Thermosetting plastics mainly include epoxy resins and polyurethanes and cannot
be recycled. The quantity of thermoplastics found in waste is increasing
corresponding. Nowadays, the largest amount of plastic wastes is disposed of by
land filling, and incineration. So, Environmental pollution increases day by day
in everywhere. Plastic wastes are the main causes of environmental pollution.
21
There are three ways to management of plastic wastes. They are land filling,
incineration and recycling. The problem of wastes cannot be solved by land filling
and incineration. Therefore, recycling method was used in this project[2].
Recycling has many types of techniques including pyrolysis; There are two types
of pyrolysis or cracking process such as thermal cracking and catalytic
cracking. Thermal cracking involves the degradation of the polymeric materials
by heating in the absence of oxygen. In thermal cracking, the temperature is about
350ºC to 900ºC.In catalytic cracking, a suitable catalyst is used to carry out the
cracking. The present of catalyst lowers the reaction temperature and time.
Addition of catalysts enhances the conversion and fuel quality[2].
Plastics have woven their way into our daily lives and now pose a
tremendous threat to the environment. Over a 100million tonnes of plastics are
produced annually worldwide, and the used products have become a common
feature at over flowing bins and landfills. Though work has been done to make
futuristic biodegradable plastics, there have not been many conclusive steps
towards cleaning up the existing problem. Here, the process of converting waste
plastic into value added fuels is explained as a viable solution for recycling of
plastics. Thus two universal problems such as problems of waste plastic and
problems of fuel shortage are being tackled simultaneously [10].
22
Thermal cracking or pyrolysis is the process of thermally degrading long
chain polymer molecules into smaller, less complex molecules through heat and
pressure. The process requires intense heat with shorter duration and in absence
of oxygen. It prevents the formation of COx, NOx and SOx due to absence of
oxygen . The three major products that are produced during pyrolysis are oil, gas
and char which are valuable for industries especially refineries. Thermal cracking
was chosen by many researchers since the process was able to produce high
amount of liquid oil up to 80 wt% at a moderate temperature of around 500°C . In
addition, thermal cracking is also very flexible since the process parameters can
be manipulated to optimize the product yield based on preferences. The liquid oil
produced can be used in multiple applications such as furnaces, boilers, turbines
and diesel engines without the need of upgrading or treatment [16].
23
2)- Pyrolysis By Catalytic Cracking
Process of pyrolysis is a thermochemical process conducted at high
temperatures and usually in presence of catalysts. Different type of catalysts,
natural and synthetic, can be used for conversion of organic wastes into valuable
fuels. The aim of catalyst is hydrogenation of alkenes, the removal of hetro atoms
such as oxygen, nitrogen and halogens. Since the use of expensive catalyst may
condition the economy of process and hence catalytic cracking process will be
advantageous when catalyst will have zero cost [3].
25
2.10- Catalytic Pyrolysis Advantages
Process of pyrolysis is a thermochemical process conducted at high
temperatures and usually in presence of catalysts. Different type of catalysts,
natural and synthetic, can be used for conversion of organic wastes into valuable
fuels [3].
26
27
3.1- Production Capacity
𝑘𝑔 (𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟) (𝑑𝑎𝑦) 𝑘𝑔
Waste plastic = 235.2 × 106 ( )∗ (𝑑𝑎𝑦)
∗ = 26849.3 ( )
𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 365 24 (ℎ𝑟) ℎ𝑟
Therefor,
We will choose the following plant capacity:
𝑘𝑔 𝑡𝑜𝑛
Inlet feed (waste LDPE) = 5000 ( ) ≈ 5 ( )
ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
28
𝑔
Density at 15 (℃); ( ) = 0.78
𝑐𝑚3
29
3.4- Overall Material Balance
And,
𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 = 99.6 % [ 22, figure (1)]
Analysis of feed = { }.
𝐴𝑠ℎ = 0.4 %
Therefor,
99.6 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 = ∗ 5000 ( ) = 4980 ( )
100 ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
F = feed = (st.4) = { 0.4 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
}
𝐴𝑠ℎ = ∗ 5000 ( ) = 20 ( )
100 ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
30
So,
𝑘𝑔
𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 = 17.63 % = 769.105 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
Liquid oil product consist of = 𝐾𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑒 = 22.28 % = 971.961 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
{ 𝐷𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑙 = 60.09 % = 2621.414 (ℎ𝑟 ) }
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 11) = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
From ref. [13, Table (1)]:
𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 87.6 %
𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 = 12.4 %
The catalyst pyrolysis yield (wt %) are = { }.
−−−−−−−
100 %
So,
87.6 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑜𝑖𝑙 = ∗ 4980 ( ) = 4362.48 ( )
100 ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
12.4 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
LDPE plastic = 𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 = ∗ 4980 ( ) = 617.52 ( )
100 ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
𝑘𝑔
{ ∑ 4980 ( ) }
ℎ𝑟
31
3.5- Mass Balance For Furnace
Analysis of (st.4):
𝑘𝑔
𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 = 99.6 % = 4980 ( )
𝐹 = (𝑠𝑡. 4) = { ℎ𝑟 }
𝑘𝑔
𝐴𝑠ℎ = 0.4 % = 20 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Then,
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 4) = ∑ 5000 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.6):
𝑘𝑔
(st.6) = Ash (solid) = 20 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.5):
𝑘𝑔
(st.5) = plastic vapours = 4980 ( ) = vapous of LDPE.
ℎ𝑟
32
Mass In = Mass Out
(st.4) = (st.5) + (st.6)
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
5000 ( ) = 20 ( ) + 4980 ( )
ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
𝒌𝒈 𝒌𝒈
𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎 ( ) = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎 ( )
𝒉𝒓 𝒉𝒓
Analysis of (st.5):
𝑘𝑔
(st.5) = plastic vapours = 4980 ( ) = vapous of LDPE.
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.8):
* From ref. [13, table (1)]; ratio of catalyst to plastic = 0.2
So,
Required catalyst = 0.2 * plastic
Required catalyst = 0.2 * 4980 (kg) = 996 (kg) [stay time in reactor one hour].
33
Analysis of (st.7):
𝑘𝑔
𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 87.6 % = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
(st.7) = Reactor output = { 𝑘𝑔
}
𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 = 12.4 % = 617.52 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Then,
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 7) = ∑ 4980 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.7):
𝑘𝑔
𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 87.6 % = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
(st.7) = Reactor output = { 𝑘𝑔
}
𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 = 12.4 % = 617.52 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 7) = ∑ 4980 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.9):
𝑘𝑔
𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
(st.9) = { 𝑘𝑔
}
𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 = 617.52 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 9) = ∑ 4980 ( )
ℎ𝑟
34
Mass In = Mass Out
(st.7) = (st.9)
𝒌𝒈 𝒌𝒈
𝟒𝟗𝟖𝟎 ( ) = 𝟒𝟗𝟖𝟎 ( )
𝒉𝒓 𝒉𝒓
Analysis of (st.9):
𝑘𝑔
𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
(st.9) = { 𝑘𝑔
}
𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 = 617.52 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 9) = ∑ 4980 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.10):
𝑘𝑔
(st.10) = Fuel gas = 617.52 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.11):
𝑘𝑔
Liquid oil = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
35
Where,
𝑘𝑔
𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 = 17.63 % = 769.105 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
Liquid oil product consist of = 𝐾𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑒 = 22.28 % = 971.961 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
{ 𝐷𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑙 = 60.09 % = 2621.414 (ℎ𝑟 ) }
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 11) = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
36
Analysis of (st.11):
𝑘𝑔
𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 = 17.63 % = 769.105 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
(st.11) = 𝐾𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑒 = 22.28 % = 971.961 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
{ 𝐷𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑙 = 60.09 % = 2621.414 ( ℎ𝑟 ) }
𝑘𝑔
∑(𝑠𝑡. 11) = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.12):
𝑘𝑔
(st.12) = Gasoline = 769.105 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.13):
𝑘𝑔
(st.13) = Kerosene = 971.961 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Analysis of (st.14):
𝑘𝑔
(st.14) = Diesel = 2621.414 ( )
ℎ𝑟
37
3.10- Mass Balance Overall
𝑘𝑔
Total Mass In = ∑(𝑠𝑡. 4) = ∑ 5000 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Total Mass Out = ∑(𝑠𝑡. 10) + (𝑠𝑡. 12) + (𝑠𝑡. 13) (𝑠𝑡. 14) + (𝑠𝑡. 6)
= ∑ 617.52 + 769.105 + 971.961 + 2621.414 + 20
𝑘𝑔
= ∑ 5000 ( )
ℎ𝑟
So,
𝒌𝒈 𝒌𝒈
𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎 ( ) = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎 ( )
𝒉𝒓 𝒉𝒓
38
39
4.1- Energy Equations For Various Phases
For liquids:
𝑄𝑖 = ∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑖 ∗ ∆𝑇
For gases:
𝑇2 𝑇2
𝑄 = ∑ 𝑛𝑖 ∫ 𝐶𝑝𝑔 ∆𝑇 = ∑ 𝑛𝑖 ∫ (𝐴 + 𝐵𝑇 + 𝐶𝑇 2 + 𝐷𝑇 3)∆𝑇
𝑇1 𝑇1
𝐵 𝐶 𝐷
𝑄 = 𝑛𝑖 [𝐴(𝑇 − 𝑇𝑟) + (𝑇2 − 𝑇𝑟2 ) + (𝑇3 − 𝑇𝑟3 ) + (𝑇4 − 𝑇𝑟4 )]
2 3 4
40
4.2- Necessary Data
From material balance calculations:
The catalytic pyrolysis for waste plastic (LDPE) are consist the following
products:
𝐿𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑂𝑖𝑙
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑠 = { 𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 }
𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑠
And, the components in (Liquid Oil) fraction obtained for (LDPE) are:
𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒; (𝐶5 ~ 𝐶9 )
𝐿𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑂𝑖𝑙 = {𝐾𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛; (𝐶10 ~ 𝐶13)}
𝐷𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑙; > 𝐶13
So, Based on the previous information, the all products are:
𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠; (𝐶1 ~ 𝐶4)
𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑠; (𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑟, 𝐶𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑜𝑛)
𝐺𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒; (𝐶5 ~ 𝐶9 )
𝐾𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛; (𝐶10 ~ 𝐶13 )
{ 𝐷𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑙; > 𝐶13 }
Where,
𝑇
𝐵 2 𝐶 𝐷
𝑄 = 𝑛 ∫ 𝐶𝑝𝑔 ∆𝑇 = 𝑛 [𝐴(𝑇 − 𝑇𝑟) + (𝑇 − 𝑇𝑟 2 ) + (𝑇 3 − 𝑇𝑟 3 ) + (𝑇 4 − 𝑇𝑟 4 )]
𝑇𝑟 2 3 4
41
Table (4.2) Properties of fuel oil products. [23,24]
𝐶𝑝𝐿 = 2.22
Gasoline 100 60 ~ 200 𝐶𝑝𝑔 = 1.55 350
𝐶𝑝𝐿 = 2.01
Kerosene 150 180 ~ 260 𝐶𝑝𝑔 = 1.4 285
𝐶𝑝𝐿 = 1.75
Diesel 200 260 ~ 340 𝐶𝑝𝑔 = 1.3 233
42
Figure (3.1) Process block diagram.
43
4.4- Energy Balance For Melter
44
So,
𝑞ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 = 𝑄2 − 𝑄1
𝑘𝐽 𝑘𝐽
𝑞ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 = 2746000 ( ) − 0 = 2746000 ( )
ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
45
𝑄4 = [𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝 ∗ ∆𝑇]𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟 = [𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝 ∗ (𝑇 − 𝑇𝑟 )]
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝐽
𝑄4 = 20 ( ) ∗ 0.9 ( ) ∗ (450 − 25)(℃)
ℎ𝑟 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒. ℃
𝑘𝐽
𝑄4 = 7650 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Choose,
𝑀𝐽
(LPG) for heating fuel; Hv ; (heating value) = 46 ~ 51 ( ).
𝑘𝑔
46
Then,
𝑞ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 = (𝑚° )𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙 ∗ (ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒)𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙
𝑘𝐽 𝑘𝐽
2721978 ( ) = (𝑚° )𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙 ∗ 50 × 103 ( )
ℎ𝑟 𝑘𝑔
𝑘𝑔
∴ (𝑚° )𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙 ; (𝐿𝑃𝐺 ) 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 = 54.44 ( )
ℎ𝑟
47
Where,
110 (℃) 150 (℃)
𝑄3 = [𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝 ∗ ∆𝑇]25 (℃) + [𝑚 ∗ 𝜆𝑣 ] + [𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝 ∗ ∆𝑇]110 (℃)
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝐽
[4980 ( ) ∗ 2.1 ( ) ∗ (350 − 150)(℃)]
ℎ𝑟 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒. ℃
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝐽
𝑄3 = + [4980 ( ) ∗ 178.6 ( )]
ℎ𝑟 𝑘𝑔
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝐽
+4980 ( ) ∗ 2.1 ( ) ∗ (450 − 350)(℃)
{ ℎ𝑟 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒. ℃ }
𝑘𝐽
𝑄3 = 4026828 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑄6 = ∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑖 ∗ ∆𝑇 = ∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑖 ∗ (𝑇 − 𝑇𝑟 )
48
4.7- Energy Balance For Condenser
𝑄6 = ∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑖 ∗ ∆𝑇 = ∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑖 ∗ (𝑇 − 𝑇𝑟 )
49
𝑄7 = [∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑖 ∗ ∆𝑇] + [∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∗ 𝜆𝑐 ]
𝑘𝑔
∴ 𝑚𝐻2 𝑂 = 𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 5480.99 ( )
ℎ𝑟
50
4.8- Energy Balance For Fractionation Column
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
∴ 𝐿 = 2.5 ∗ 𝐷 = 2.5 ∗ 769.105 ( ) = 1922.76 ( )
ℎ𝑟 ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
𝑉𝑛 = (𝐿 + 𝐷 ) = 1922.76 + 769.105 = 2691.87 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Where,
𝑞𝐶 = 𝑚 ∗ 𝜆𝑐 = 𝑉𝑛 ∗ 𝜆𝑐
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝐽 𝑘𝐽
𝑞𝐶 = (2691.87 ( )) ∗ (350 ( )) = 942154.5 ( )
ℎ𝑟 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
51
Cooling water required for condenser:
𝑞𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑑. = 𝑚𝐻2 𝑂 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝐻2𝑂 ∗ ∆𝑇
𝑘𝐽 𝑘𝐽
942154.5 ( ) = 𝑚𝐻2 𝑂 ∗ 4.2 ( ) ∗ (40 − 25)(℃)
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔. ℃
𝑘𝑔
∴ 𝑚𝐻2 𝑂 = 𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 1495.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
Where,
𝑄𝐹 = ∑ 𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑙 ∗ ∆𝑇
𝑄𝐷 = 𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑙 ∗ ∆𝑇
𝑄𝐷 = {[769.105 ∗ 2.22] ∗ (130 − 25)}
𝑘𝐽
𝑄𝐷 = 179278.38 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑄𝐵 = 𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑙 ∗ ∆𝑇
𝑄𝐵 = {[971.961 ∗ 1.75] ∗ (300 − 25)}
𝑘𝐽
𝑄𝐵 = 467756.23 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑄𝑠 = 𝑚 ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝑙 ∗ ∆𝑇
𝑄𝑠 = {[2621.414 ∗ 2.01] ∗ (220 − 25)}
𝑘𝐽
𝑄𝑠 = 1027463.22 ( )
ℎ𝑟
52
Where,
𝑞𝑅 = (𝑄𝐷 + 𝑄𝐵 + 𝑞𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑑. ) − 𝑄𝐹
𝑞𝑅 = (179278.38 + 467756.23 + 942154.5) − 206213.23
𝑘𝐽
𝑞𝑅 = 1382975.88 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
∴ 𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 = 611.891 ( ) = 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
ℎ𝑟
53
54
5.1- Fixed Bed Reactor
Viscosity at
Comp. M.wt 𝑇𝐵𝑃 (℃) Density; Heat capacity; 350 (℃); 𝜇
(
𝑘𝑔
)
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 ( 3) CpL (
𝑘𝐽
) 𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑚 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒.𝑘 ( 2 )
𝑚
LDPE 4000 MP = 110 9200 1.9 ~ 2.3 100
BP = 350
Gases C1 ~ C4 44 -42.1 1.8 3.05 0.0074
(C3H8)
Gasoline 100 60 ~ 200 750 1.55 0.6
55
For Plastic Pyrolysis Oil (Liquid Oil):
𝑀𝐽
Calorific value ( ) = 39.5
𝑘𝑔
So,
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
M = 4980 ( ) = 83 ( )
ℎ𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 )𝑎𝑣. = 9.052 ( )
𝑚3
56
𝑀
∴ 𝑉 ° = 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 =
𝜌𝑣
𝑘𝑔
83 ( ) 𝑚3
° 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑉 = = 9.17 ( )
𝑘𝑔 𝑚𝑖𝑛
9.052 ( 3)
𝑚
Where,
dNA
Acc. = = 0 (𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠 )
dt
∴ 𝐼𝑛 – 𝑂𝑢𝑡 + 𝐺𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 0
𝐹𝐴° − 𝐹𝐴 + 𝑟𝐴 𝑉 = 0
𝑑(𝐹𝐴° − 𝐹𝐴 ) 𝑑(𝐹𝐴° ∗ 𝑋𝐴 )
𝐹𝐴° − 𝐹𝐴 = −𝑟𝐴 𝑉 → 𝑑𝑉 = =
−𝑟𝐴 −𝑟𝐴
𝑉 𝑋𝐴 𝐹𝐴° ∗ 𝑋𝐴 𝑋𝐴 𝑑𝑋
𝐴
∫ 𝑑𝑉 = ∫ → 𝑉 = 𝐹𝐴° ∫ … … … … … 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝐹𝑅
0 0 −𝑟𝐴 0 −𝑟𝐴
𝑉 𝐹𝐴° 𝑋𝐴 𝑑𝑋𝐴
𝜏𝑟 = ° = ° ∫
𝑉 𝑉 0 −𝑟𝐴
𝑋𝐴
𝑉 𝑑𝑋𝐴
∴ 𝜏𝑟 = = 𝐶𝐴° ∫
𝑉° 0 −𝑟𝐴
Where,
𝐹𝐴°
𝐶𝐴° =
𝑉°
𝑉
𝜏𝑟 =
𝑉°
𝜏𝑟 = Residence time.
𝑟𝐴 = rate of reaction.
57
𝐹𝐴° = initial moles of comp. A.
𝛽
−𝑟𝐴 = 𝑘 ∗ 𝐶𝐴𝛼 ∗ 𝐶𝐵 & 𝑛 = (𝛼 + 𝛽 ) … … …[33]
𝛼 = 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝. (𝐴) & 𝛽 = 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝. (𝐵 )
Where,
𝐹𝐴° (𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 )
𝐶𝐴° =
𝑉 ° (𝑚3 )
𝐹𝐵° (𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 )
𝐶𝐵° =
𝑉 ° (𝑚3)
𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴° ∗ (1 − 𝑋𝐴 )
𝐶𝐵 = 𝐶𝐵° − 𝐶𝐴° ∗ 𝑋𝐴 … … … … … ..[33]
1 𝑋𝐴 𝑑𝑋𝐴
𝑡𝑟 = ∗ ∫
𝐾 0 (1 − 𝑋𝐴 ) ∗ (𝐶𝐵° − 𝐶𝐴° ∗ 𝑋𝐴 )
58
5.1.3- Catalyst Volume (Vact.)
Residence time = 𝜏𝑟 = 10 (min).[35]
Where,
𝑚3 𝑚3
𝑉 ° = volumetric flow rate ( ) 𝑜𝑟 ( ).
ℎ𝑟 𝑠
°
𝑚3
𝑉 = 9.17 ( )
𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑉𝑐
𝜏𝑟 = ° → 𝑉𝑐 = 𝜏𝑟 ∗ 𝑉 °
𝑉
𝑚3
𝑉𝑐 = 10 (𝑚𝑖𝑛) ∗ 9.17 ( ) = 91.7 (𝑚3)
𝑚𝑖𝑛
And,
𝜋
𝑉𝑎𝑐𝑡. = ∗ (𝐷𝑅 )2 ∗ 𝐿
4
Where,
𝐷𝑅 = reactor diameter.
L = catalyst height.
From [ref.34]:
Select catalyst particles diameter dP = 15 (mm); (assumed).
Select pressure drop (∆𝑃) from (2.5 to 15) (Kpas).
(𝐷𝑅 )6 − 𝛽 ∗ 𝐾 ∗ (𝐷𝑅 )2 − 𝐾 = 0
Where,
67.32 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 𝜇𝑓 ∗ (1 − 𝜖𝐵 )
𝛽=
𝑑𝑝 ∗ 𝑚 °
59
Where,
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
𝑚° = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 4980 ( ) = 1.383 ( )
ℎ𝑟 𝑠
𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝜇𝑓 = 𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 = 0.02 ( )
𝑚2
𝑑𝑝 = 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = 15 (𝑚𝑚)
𝜌𝐵
𝜖𝐵 = 𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑒 = (1 − ) = 0.45
𝜌𝑝
60
Table (5.2) ∆𝑃 Vs. 𝐷𝑅 .
∆𝑃 (Kpas) K 𝐷𝑅 (m)
2.5 1667.34 3.68
5 833.67 3.11
7.5 555.78 2.8
10 416.83 2.61
12.5 333.47 2.47
15 277.89 2.36
16
14
12
10
Pressure (kpas)
8
0
4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0
DR (m)
61
5.1.4- Total Reactor Volume (VR)
𝜋
𝑉𝑅 = ∗ (𝐷𝑅 )2 ∗ 𝐻 … … … … ..[33]
4
Where,
H = total reactor height (m).
VR = total reactor volume (𝑚3).
DR = reactor diameter (m).
62
From previous calculation:
𝑚3
𝑉 ° = Volumetric flow rate = 9.17 ( ).
𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 = average density = 9.052 ( ).
𝑚3
𝐷𝑃 ∗𝐺 15×10−3 ∗0.259
Re = Reynold No. = NRe = = = 19425
𝜇 0.02×10−3
63
From [ref.26]:
When,
Re = 19425
𝑓𝑚 = 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 1
n = exponent = 1.98
𝜃𝑠 = 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑝𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 0.3
64
5.1.6- Data Sheet
Operating Data
Type of charge Phase Gases & vapors
Rate of charge 𝑘𝑔⁄ℎ𝑟 4980
Catalyst type Catalyst Bentonite clay
Gas content % 100
Liquid content % 0
Working temperature ℃ 450
Working pressure atm 2
Volumetric flow rate 𝑚3⁄ℎ𝑟 9.17
Viscosity 𝑚𝑁𝑠 ⁄𝑚2 0.02
Density 𝑘𝑔⁄𝑚3 9.052
Design Data
Reactor volume 𝑚3 107.9
Catalyst volume 𝑚3 91.7
Reactor height m 20.2
Catalyst height m 17.14
Reactor diameter m 2.61
Pressure drop Kpas 13.16
65
5.2- Condenser Design
66
Figure (5.2) U – tube (based on figures from BS 3274; 1960).[25]
Figure (5.3) Internal floating with clamp ring (based on figures from BS 3274;
1960).[25]
Figure (5.4) Kettle reboiler with U – tube bundle (based on figures from BS
3274; 1960).[25]
67
5.2.1- Thermal Prosperities
For Water (cooling water):[25,28]
40 + 25
𝑇𝑎𝑣. = = 32.5 (℃)
2
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝐿 = 998 ( )
𝑚3
𝑘𝐽
𝐶𝑃𝐿 = 4.2 ( )
𝑘𝑔. ℃
𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝜇𝐿 = 0.68 ( )
𝑚2
𝑘𝐽
𝑘𝑓 = 0.57 ( )
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
68
For Liquid Oil: [25,28]
350 + 50
𝑇𝑎𝑣. = = 200 (℃)
2
𝐴𝑃𝐼 = 47.75
𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝜇𝐿 = 4.34 ( )
𝑚2
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝐿 = 780 ( )
𝑚3
𝑘𝑔
𝑀𝑤𝑡 )𝑎𝑣. = 250 ( )
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝜇𝑣 = 0.02 ( )
𝑚2
𝑘𝐽
𝐶𝑃𝐿 = 2.26 ( )
𝑘𝑔. ℃
𝑘𝐽
𝑘𝑙 = 0.1 ( )
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 = 12.75 ( )
𝑚3
69
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − ( 𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2)
ln 1
( 𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Where,
∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 = log mean temp. difference.
𝑇1 & 𝑇2 = inlet and outlet hot fluid temp.
𝑡1 & 𝑡2 = inlet and outlet cold fluid temp.
From [ref.25]:
∆𝑇𝑚 = 𝐹𝑡 ∗ ∆𝑇𝑙𝑚
Where,
∆𝑇𝑚 = tube temp. difference.
𝐹𝑡 = correction factor.
And,
(𝑇1 − 𝑇2) 350 − 50
𝑅= = = 20
(𝑡2 − 𝑡1) 40 − 25
(𝑡2 − 𝑡1) 40 − 25
𝑆= = = 0.046
(𝑇1 − 𝑡1 ) 350 − 25
70
Choose,
One shell & two tube passes.
∴ 𝐹𝑡 = 0.96 … ….[25]
∴ ∆𝑇𝑚 = 𝐹𝑡 ∗ ∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 = 0.96 ∗ 113.2 (℃) = 108.7 (℃)
Figure (5.5) Temperature correction factor: one shell pass; two or more even
tube passes.[25]
71
5.2.3- Heat Transfer Area (A)
𝑄 = 𝑈 ∗ 𝐴 ∗ ∆𝑇𝑚 … … ….[25]
𝑄
∴𝐴=
𝑈 ∗ ∆𝑇𝑚
Where,
𝐽
Q = q = heat transfer (w); ( ).
𝑠
𝑤
U = overall heat transfer coefficient ( ).
𝑚2 .℃
𝑘𝐽 (ℎ𝑟) 𝑘𝐽
Q = 3453028.97 ( ) ∗ (𝑠)
= 9591 ( ) = 9591.747 (𝑘𝑤 )
ℎ𝑟 3600 𝑠
𝑄 = 9.592 × 106 (𝑤 )
From [ref.25]:
𝑤 𝑤
Assume, U = 600 ( ); because U = 500 ~ 700 ( ); for condenser &
𝑚2 .℃ 𝑚2 .℃
organic water system.
9.592 ∗ 106 (𝑊 )
𝐴= 𝑤 = 147.1 (𝑚2)
600 ( 2 ) ∗ 108.7(℃)
𝑚 .℃
72
Table (5.4) Typical overall coefficients.[25]
73
5.2.4- Number Of Tubes
From [ref.25]:
Choose,
3
d = (in) & L = 16 (ft) = 4.88 (m).
4
74
5.2.5- Bundle Diameter (Db)
From [ref.25]:
Where,
𝑁= No. of tubes = 480
𝑑 ° = 20 (mm).
K1 & n1 = constants.
𝐷𝑏 = bundle diameter (mm).
1
480 2.291
𝐷𝑏 = 20 (𝑚𝑚) ∗ ( ) → 𝐷𝑏 = 666.1 (𝑚𝑚)
0.156
75
5.2.6- For tube side:
Mass Velocity (G) & Velocity (u)
Where,
𝑘𝑔
𝑚° = 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 54809.98 ( ) …….. from Energy Balance
ℎ𝑟
𝜋 𝜋
Tube cross – sectional area = ∗ (𝑑𝑖 )2 = ∗ (16)2 = 201.1 (𝑚𝑚2)
4 4
At = total flow area per pass = 240 * 201.1× 10−6 (𝑚2) = 0.0483 (𝑚2 )
𝑘𝑔
54809.98 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑚° 3600 𝑘𝑔
G = Mass velocity = = = 315.22 ( )
𝐴𝑡 0.0483 (𝑚2 ) 𝑚2 .𝑠
And,
𝑘𝑔
𝐺 315.22 ( ) 𝑚
𝑚2 .𝑠
u = Velocity = = 𝑘𝑔 = 0.316 ( )
𝜌 998 ( 3 ) 𝑠
𝑚
𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝜇𝑙 = 0.68 ( )
𝑚2
𝑑𝑖 = 16 (mm)
𝜌 ∗ 𝑢 ∗ 𝑑𝑖 𝐺 ∗ 𝑑𝑖
𝑅𝑒 = =
𝜇𝑙 𝜇𝑙
𝐾𝑔
315.22 ( 2 ) ∗ 16 × 10−3(𝑚𝑚)
𝑅𝑒 = 𝑚 .𝑠 = 7416.94
0.68 × 10−3
76
3 𝐾𝐽 −3 𝑁𝑠
𝐶𝑃 ∗ 𝜇 4.2 × 10 (𝑘𝑔. 𝑘 ) ∗ 0.68 × 10 (𝑚2 )
𝑃𝑟 = = 𝑤 = 5.01
𝑘𝑓 0.57 ( )
𝑚. ℃
When,
𝐿 4.88 (𝑚)
𝑅𝑒 = 7416.94 & = = 305
𝑑𝑖 16 × 10−3
From [ref.25]:
𝐽ℎ = ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 4.1 × 10−3
Where,
𝜇 0.14
( ) = 1; (𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑)
𝜇𝑤
ℎ𝑖 ∗ 𝑑𝑖 1 𝜇 0.14
∴ = 𝐽ℎ ∗ 𝑅𝑒 ∗ (𝑃𝑟 )3 ∗ ( )
𝑘𝑓 𝜇𝑤
ℎ𝑖 ∗ 16 × 10−3 1
= 4.1 × 10−3 ∗ 7416.94 ∗ (5.01)3 ∗ (1)0.14
0.57
𝑤
∴ ℎ𝑖 = 1843.78 ( 2 )
𝑚 .℃
77
5.2.7- For shell side:
Mass Velocity (G) & Velocity (u) [25]
Where,
𝑘𝑔
𝑚° = 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 4980 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝐷𝑏 = 666.1 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐷𝑠 = 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = (𝐷𝑏 + 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒)
Where,
Clearance = 64 (mm).
𝐷𝑠 = 666.1 + 64 = 730.1 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐷𝑠
𝐿𝐵 = 𝑏𝑎𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = … ….[25]
𝑏𝑎𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑒 𝑁𝑜.
Note:
Buffle No. = 1; because change in phase inside shell side.
730.1 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐿𝐵 = = 730.1 (𝑚𝑚)
1
1.27
𝑑𝑒 = 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = ∗ ((𝑃𝑡 )2 − 0.917 (𝑑 ° )2 ) … …. For sequare.
𝑑°
1.27 2 2
𝑑𝑒 = ∗ ((25 (𝑚𝑚)) − 0.917 (20 (𝑚𝑚)) ) = 16.4 (𝑚𝑚)
20 (𝑚𝑚)
(𝑃𝑡 − 𝑑 ° ) ∗ 𝐷𝑠 ∗ 𝐿𝐵
𝐴𝑠 = 𝐶𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 − 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 =
𝑃𝑡
(25 − 20) ∗ 730.1 ∗ 730.1 × 10−6
𝐴𝑠 = = 0.107 (𝑚2 )
25
78
𝑚°
𝐺𝑠 = 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 =
𝐴𝑠
𝑘𝑔
4980 (
)
ℎ𝑟
3600 𝐾𝑔
𝐺𝑠 = = 12.93 ( )
0.107 (𝑚2) 𝑚2. 𝑠
𝐾𝑔
𝐺𝑠 12.93 ( ) 𝑚
𝑚2 .𝑠
u= = 𝑘𝑔 = 1.014 ( )
𝜌 12.75 ( 3 ) 𝑠
𝑚
79
Shell Side Coefficient (𝒉° )
𝑚
u = 1.014 ( )
𝑠
𝐾𝑔
𝐺𝑠 = 12.93 ( )
𝑚2 . 𝑠
𝑚𝑁𝑠
𝜇𝑙 = 4.34 ( )
𝑚2
𝑤
𝑘𝑓 = 0.1 ( )
𝑚.℃
𝑑𝑒 = 16.4 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑘𝐽
𝐶𝑝 = 2.26 ( )
𝑘𝑔.℃
𝑊𝑐
𝑇𝑣 =
𝑁𝑡 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 𝑑 °
4980 𝑘𝑔
( ) 𝑘𝑔
3600 𝑠
𝑇𝑣 = = 0.0459 ( )
480 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 20 × 10−3 𝑚. 𝑠
And,
4 ∗ 𝑇𝑣 4 ∗ 0.0459
∴ 𝑅𝑒 = = = 423.04
𝜇𝑙 4.34 × 10−3
3 𝐾𝑔 −3
𝐶𝑃 ∗ 𝜇𝑙 2.26 × 10 (𝑚2. 𝑠) ∗ 4.34 × 10
𝑃𝑟 = = = 9.81
𝑘𝑓 0.1
80
Where,
𝑘𝑔
𝑇𝑣 = 0.0459 ( )
𝑚. 𝑠
𝑤
𝑘𝑓 = 𝑘𝑙 = 0.1 ( )
𝑚. ℃
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑙 = 780 ( )
𝑚3
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 = 12.75 ( )
𝑚3
Figure (5.7) Shell – side heat transfer factors, segmental baffles. [25]
81
5.2.8- Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient (𝑼°)
Where,
𝑤 °
𝑤
ℎ𝑖 = 1843.78 ( ) & ℎ = 4286.03 ( )
𝑚2. ℃ 𝑚2. ℃
From [ ref.25]:
𝑤
ℎ𝑖𝑑 = 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 5000 ( 2 )
𝑚 .℃
𝑤
ℎ° 𝑑 = 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 5000 ( 2 )
𝑚 .℃
From [ref.1]:
𝑤
∴ 𝑘𝑤 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑠 = 36 ( )
𝑚. ℃
° 𝑑°
1 1 1 𝑑 ∗ ln ( ) 𝑑° 1 𝑑° 1
𝑑𝑖
= + + +( ∗ )+( ∗ )
𝑈 ° ℎ° ℎ° 𝑑 2 ∗ 𝑘𝑤 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑖𝑑 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑖
20
1 1 1 20 × 10−3 ∗ ln ( )
= + + 16 + (20 ∗ 1 ) + (20 ∗ 1
)
𝑈 ° 4286.03 5000 2 ∗ 36 16 5000 16 1843.78
𝑤
∴ 𝑈 ° = 702.62 ( )
𝑚2. ℃
𝑈 ° − 𝑈 702.62 − 600
% 𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = = ∗ 100 = 17.1 %
𝑈 600
82
Table (5.7) Fouling factors (Coefficients), typical values.[25]
83
Assume,
𝑤
𝑈 ° = 702.62 ( ) ; (2𝑛𝑑 − 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 )
𝑚2. ℃
𝐴 = 125.59 (𝑚2) & 𝑁𝑡 = 409.1 = 410 & 𝐷𝑏 = 621.8 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐴𝑡 = 0.0412
𝑘𝑔
𝐺 = 369.54 ( )
𝑚2 . 𝑠
𝑚 𝑤
𝑢 = 0.37 ( ) ℎ𝑖 = 2161.51 ( )
𝑠 𝑚2 .℃
𝑅𝑒 = 8695.06
𝑃𝑟 = 5.01
𝐽ℎ = 4.1 × 10−3
𝑈 ° − 𝑈 755.05 − 702.62
% 𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = = ∗ 100 = 7.4 %
𝑈 702.62
𝑙 𝜇 −𝑚 𝜌 ∗ 𝑢𝑡 2
∆𝑃𝑡 = 𝑁𝑃 [8 ∗ 𝐽𝑓 ∗ ( ) ∗ ( ) + 2.5] ∗
𝑑𝑖 𝜇𝑤 2
Where,
𝑁𝑃 = No. of passes = 2
L = tube length = 4.88 (m)
di = inside tube diameter = 16 (mm)
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 = fluid density = 998 ( )
𝑚3
𝑚
ut = velocity inside tube = 0.37 ( ).
𝑠
𝜇
( )=1
𝜇𝑤
When,
𝑅𝑒 = 8695.06 → 𝐽𝑓 = 5 × 10−3 … … … ..[25]
−3
4.88 × 103 998 ∗ (0.37)2
∴ ∆𝑃𝑡 = 2 [8 ∗ 5 × 10 ∗( ) ∗ 1 + 2.5] ∗
16 2
𝑁
∆𝑃𝑡 = 20084.1 ( ) = 2.91 (𝑝𝑠𝑖)
𝑚2
85
Figure (5.9) Tube – side fraction factors.[25]
𝐷𝑠 𝐿 𝜌 ∗ 𝑢𝑠 2
∆𝑃𝑠 = [8 ∗ 𝐽𝑓 ∗ ( ) ∗ ( )] ∗
𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝐵 2
Where,
𝐷𝑠 = shell diameter = 684.8 (mm)
𝐿𝐵 = buffle spacing = 684.8 (mm)
L = tube length = 4.88 (m)
de = equivalent diameter = 16.2 (mm)
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 = fluid density = 780 ( )
𝑚3
𝑚
Us = velocity in shell = 1.154 ( ).
𝑠
𝜇
( )=1
𝜇𝑤
86
When,
𝑅𝑒 = 497.7 → 𝐽𝑓 = 6 × 10−3 … … … ..[25]
−3
684.8 4.88 × 10−3 780 ∗ (1.154)2
∴ ∆𝑃𝑠 = [8 ∗ 6 × 10 ∗( )∗( )] ∗
16.2 684.8 2
𝑁
∆𝑃𝑠 = 17418.11 ( ) = 2.53 (𝑝𝑠𝑖)
𝑚2
87
5.3- Gas – Liquid Separator
From [ref.25]:
5.3.1- Properties
From Material & Energy balance:
For liquid oil:
𝑀𝐽
Calorific value ( ) = 39.5
𝑘𝑔
𝑃 ∗ 𝑀𝑤𝑡 101.3 ∗ 44 𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 = = = 1.66 ( 3)
𝑅∗𝑇 8.314 ∗ (50 + 273) 𝑚
So,
𝑘𝑔
𝑀 617.52 ( ) 𝑚3
° ℎ𝑟
𝑉 = = = 372 ( )
𝜌 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟
1.66 ( 3)
𝑚
From (Liquid Outlet Stream):
𝑘𝑔
M = mass flow rate = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑙 = 780 ( )
𝑚3
So,
𝑘𝑔
𝑀 4362.48( ℎ𝑟 ) 𝑚3
°
𝑉 = = 𝑘𝑔 = 5.6 ( )
𝜌 780( 3 ) ℎ𝑟
𝑚
89
5.3.3- Settling Velocity (ut)
From [ref.25]:
1
𝜌𝑙 − 𝜌𝑣 2
𝑢𝑡 = 0.07 ∗ [ ]
𝜌𝑣
Where,
𝑚
𝑢𝑡 = 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 ( )
𝑠
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑙 = 𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 ( )
𝑚3
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 = 𝑣𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 ( )
𝑚3
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑣 = 1.66 ( )
𝑚3
From (Liquid Outlet Stream):
𝑘𝑔
M = 4362.48 ( )
ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑙 = 780 ( )
𝑚3
1
780 − 1.66 2 𝑚
∴ 𝑢𝑡 = 0.07 ∗ [ ] = 1.52 ( )
1.66 𝑠
So,
𝑚 𝑚
𝑢𝑡 = 0.15 ∗ 1.52 ( ) = 0.228 ( )
𝑠 𝑠
90
5.3.4- Minimum Allowable Diameter (𝑫𝒗 )
4∗𝑉𝑣
𝐷𝑣 = √ … … … … … … ..[25]
𝜋∗𝑢𝑡
Where,
𝐷𝑣 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 (𝑚)
𝑚3
𝑉𝑣 = 𝑣𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 ( )
𝑠
𝑚
𝑢𝑡 = 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 ( )
𝑠
𝑚3
372 ( ) 𝑚3
ℎ𝑟
𝑉𝑣 = = 0.303 ( )
3600 𝑠
𝑚
𝑢𝑡 = 0.228 ( )
𝑠
4 ∗ 0.303
𝐷𝑣 = √ = 1.3 (𝑚)
𝜋 ∗ 0.228
−3
𝑚3 60 (𝑠)
𝑉𝐿 = [1.56 × 10 ( )] ∗ [10 (𝑚𝑖𝑛) ∗ ] = 0.936 (𝑚3)
𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝜋
A = vessel cross – sectional area = ∗ 𝐷 2
4
𝜋
𝐴= ∗ (1.3)2 = 1.327 (𝑚2 )
4
91
𝑉𝐿 0.936 (𝑚3)
∴ 𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = ℎ𝐿 = = = 0.71 (𝑚)
𝐴 1.327 (𝑚2)
𝐷𝑣 1.3 (𝑚)
ℎ𝑑 = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 = = = 0.65 (𝑚)
2 2
92
𝐷𝑣 = 1.3 (𝑚)
ℎ𝐿 = 1.42 (𝑚)
ℎ𝑑 = 0.65 (𝑚)
ℎ𝑔 = 1.7 (𝑚)
𝑚
𝑢𝑡 = 0.228 ( )
𝑠
𝐻 = 3.77 (𝑚)
93
94
6.1- Mechanical Design Of Reactor
1- Cylindrical Shell Thickness (t):
𝑝𝑖 𝐷𝑖
𝑡=
2𝑆𝐸 − 1.2 𝑝𝑖
Where,
𝑡 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑁
𝑝𝑖 = 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
Then,
𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = 𝑇𝑖 = 450 (℃) + 15 = 465 (℃)
𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 = 𝑝𝑖 = 2 (𝑏𝑎𝑟) ∗ 1.1 = 2.2 (𝑏𝑎𝑟)
From ref.[24]:
𝑁
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑆 = 70 (𝑎𝑡 465 (℃)), 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙.
𝑚𝑚2
𝑁
2.2 ( 2 ) ∗ 2610 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑚 = 5 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑁 𝑁
(2 ∗ 70 ( ) ∗ 1) − 1.2 ∗ 2.2 ( )
𝑚𝑚2 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 5 (𝑚𝑚) + 2 (𝑚𝑚) = 7 (𝑚𝑚)
95
2- Head Thickness (t):
Choose, (tori-spherical head type) at Pi = 2.2 (bar).
0.885 𝑝𝑖 𝑅𝑐
𝑡=
𝑆𝐸 − 0.1 𝑝𝑖
Where,
𝑁
𝑝𝑖 = 0.22 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
𝐷𝑖 = 𝑅𝑐 = 2610 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑁
𝑆 = 70 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
𝐸=1
Then,
𝑁
0.885 ∗ 0.22 ( ) ∗ 2610 (𝑚𝑚)
∴ 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑚2 = 8 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑁 𝑁
(70 ( ) ∗ 1) − 0.1 ∗ 0.22 ( )
𝑚𝑚2 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 8 (𝑚𝑚) + 2 (𝑚𝑚) = 106 (𝑚𝑚)
3- Nozzle Sizing:
For nozzle feed (F):
𝑘𝑔
𝑚° 𝐹 4980 ( ) 𝑚3 𝑚3
° ℎ𝑟
𝑉 = = = = 550.2 ( ) = 0.153 ( )
𝜌𝑓 𝜌𝑎𝑣. 9.052 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
( 3)
𝑚
Where,
𝜋
𝑉° = 𝑢 ∗ 𝐴 = 𝑢 ∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
When,
𝑚
u = 15 ( ) , (𝐺𝑎𝑠 𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒)
𝑠
96
Then,
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
0.153 ( ) = 15 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑𝐹 )2
𝑠 𝑠 4
𝑘𝑔
𝑚 °
𝑃 4980 ( ) 𝑚3 𝑚3
° ℎ𝑟
𝑉 = = = = 550.2 ( ) = 0.153 ( )
𝜌𝑝 𝜌𝑎𝑣. 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
9.052 ( 3)
𝑚
Where,
𝜋
𝑉° = 𝑢 ∗ 𝐴 = 𝑢 ∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
When,
𝑚
u = 15 ( ) , (𝐺𝑎𝑠 𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒)
𝑠
Then,
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
0.153 ( ) = 15 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑𝑃 )2
𝑠 𝑠 4
97
4- Shell Weight (𝑾𝝊 ):
Where,
𝑊𝜐 = 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 (𝑁).
𝐻𝜐 = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ (𝑚).
𝐶𝜐 = 1.15 (𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡).
𝑚 𝑚
𝑔 = 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ( 2) = 9.81 ( 2) .
𝑠 𝑠
𝑡 = 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝑚𝑚).
𝐷𝑚 = 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 (𝑚) = (𝐷 + 𝑡 × 10−3).
Then,
𝐻𝜐 = 20.2 (𝑚)
𝑡 = 𝑒 = 10 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐷𝑚 = (2.61 + 10 × 10−3 ) = 2.62 (𝑚)
98
5- Weight Of Packing (𝑾𝑷 ):
𝜋
𝑉𝑐 = ∗ (𝐷)2 ∗ 𝑍 … … ….[24]
4
Where,
Then,
𝑊𝑃 = 𝑉𝑐 ∗ 𝜌𝑃
𝑘𝑔
𝑊𝑃 = 91.7 (𝑚3 ) ∗ 881 ( ) ∗ 9.81 = 792527.3 (𝑁)
𝑚3
99
6- Bracket Support Design (supported on legs):
From [ref.24]:
𝐹𝑏𝑠 = 60 𝐿𝑐 𝑡𝑐
Where,
𝑊 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
𝐹𝑏𝑠 = =
4 4
When,
D = diameter = 2.61 (m)
Then,
W = 1000 KN (maximum weight) [24]
Take,
NO. of brackets = 4 & 𝑡𝑐 = 30 (𝑚𝑚)
1000 (𝐾𝑁)
𝐹𝑏𝑠 = = 250 (𝐾𝑁); (𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑡)
4
100
6.1.1- Cost For Fixed Bed Reactor
Where,
H = reactor height = 20.2 (m).
D = reactor diameter = 2.61 (m).
Z = packing height = 17.14 (m).
For packing:
1
𝑑𝑝 = (𝑖𝑛) = 15 (𝑚𝑚) = 𝑆
2
𝜋
𝑉𝑝 = 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 𝑉𝑐 = ∗ (𝐷)2 ∗ 𝑍 = 91.7 (𝑚3)
4
$
C = constant = 1400 ( ).[24]
𝑚3
$
∴ 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 𝐶 ∗ 𝑉𝑝 = 1400 ( 3 ) ∗ 91.7(𝑚3) = 128380 ($), 𝑖𝑛 (1998)
𝑚
Equipment cost = 70 × 103 + 128380 = 198380 ($) 𝑖𝑛 (1998)
101
Figure (6.1) Vertical pressure vessels. Time base mid – 1998.[24]
102
Table (6.1) Purchase cost of miscellaneous equipment, cost factors for use in
equation (1) cost basis mid 1998.[24]
Table (6.2) Cost of column packing. Cost basis mid 1998. [24]
103
6.1.2- Control For Fixed Bed Reactor
CV = Control valve.
FC = Flow controller.
FI = Flow indicator.
TC = Temperature controller.
TI = Temperature indicator.
PI = Pressure indicator.
LC = Level controller.
104
6.2- Mechanical Design For Condenser
1- Cylindrical Shell Thickness (t):
𝑝𝑖 𝐷𝑖
𝑡=
2𝑆𝐸 − 1.2 𝑝𝑖
Where,
𝑡 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑁
𝑝𝑖 = 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
Then,
𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = 𝑇𝑖 = 350 (℃) + 15 = 365 (℃)
𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 = 𝑝𝑖 = 2 (𝑏𝑎𝑟) ∗ 1.1 = 2.2 (𝑏𝑎𝑟)
From [ref.25]:
𝑁
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑆 = 70 (𝑎𝑡 365 (℃)), 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙.
𝑚𝑚2
𝑁
0.22 ( ) ∗ 684.8 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑚2 = 3 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑁 𝑁
(2 ∗ 70 ( ) ∗ 1) − 1.2 ∗ 0.22 ( )
𝑚𝑚2 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 3 (𝑚𝑚) + 2 (𝑚𝑚) = 5 (𝑚𝑚)
105
2- Head Thickness (t):
Choose, (tori-spherical head type) at Pi = 2.2 (bar).
0.885 𝑝𝑖 𝑅𝑐
𝑡=
𝑆𝐸 − 0.1 𝑝𝑖
Where,
𝑁
𝑝𝑖 = 0.22 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
𝐷𝑖 = 𝑅𝑐 = 684.8 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑁
𝑆 = 70 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
𝐸=1
Then,
𝑁
0.885 ∗ 0.22 ( ) ∗ 684.8 (𝑚𝑚)
∴ 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑚2 = 5 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑁 𝑁
(70 ( ) ∗ 1) − 0.1 ∗ 0.22 ( )
𝑚𝑚2 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 5 (𝑚𝑚) + 2 (𝑚𝑚) = 7 (𝑚𝑚)
3- Nozzle Sizing:
Nozzle for tube side:
𝑘𝑔
𝑚 ° 54809.98 ( ) 𝑚3 𝑚3
ℎ𝑟
𝑉= = = 54.92 ( ) = 0.0153 ( )
𝜌 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
998 ( )
𝑚3
Where,
𝜋
𝑉 =𝑢∗𝐴 =𝑢∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
When,
𝑚
u=2( )
𝑠
106
Then,
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
0.0153 ( ) = 2 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑)2
𝑠 𝑠 4
𝑘𝑔
𝑚° 4980 ( ℎ𝑟 ) 𝑚3 𝑚3
𝑉= = = 6.385 ( ) = 0.0018 ( )
𝜌 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
780 ( 3)
𝑚
Where,
𝜋
𝑉 =𝑢∗𝐴 =𝑢∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
When,
𝑚
u=2( )
𝑠
Then,
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
0.0018 ( ) = 2 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑)2
𝑠 𝑠 4
107
4- Shell Weight (𝑾𝝊 ):
Where,
𝑊𝜐 = 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 (𝑁).
𝐻𝜐 = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ (𝑚).
𝐶𝜐 = 1.15 (𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡).
𝑚 𝑚
𝑔 = 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ( 2) = 9.81 ( 2) .
𝑠 𝑠
𝑡 = 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝑚𝑚).
𝐷𝑚 = 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 (𝑚) = (𝐷 + 𝑡 × 10−3).
Then,
𝐻𝜐 = 4.88 (𝑚)
𝑡 = 𝑒 = 7 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐷𝑚 = (684.8 + 7 × 10−3 ) = 0.692 (𝑚)
108
5- Weight Of Tubes (𝑾𝑵 ):
𝑊𝑁1 = 240 𝐶𝜐 𝐷𝑚 (𝐻𝜐 + 0.8 𝐷𝑚 ) ∗ 𝑡 … … … … … … … ..[25]
Where,
𝑑 ° − 𝑑𝑖 20 − 16
𝑡= = = 2 (𝑚𝑚)
2 2
Then,
109
6- Bracket Supports Design:
From [ref.25]:
110
6.2.1- Cost For H.E.
Where,
A = area heat transfer = 125.59 (𝑚2).
From [ref.30]:
At pressure = 2.2 (bar) = 222.86 (Kpas)
∴ 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 1.5 × 104 ($), 𝑖𝑛 (1998)
Figure (6.2) Purchase cost of floating heat exchangers with 0.019 (m) OD
3
×0.025 (m) ( (𝑖𝑛)𝑂𝐷 × 1 (𝑖𝑛))square pitch and 4.88 (m) = 16 (ft).bundles of
4
carbon steel construction.[30]
111
6.2.2- Control For H.E.
CV = Control valve.
FC = Flow controller.
FI = Flow indicator.
TC = Temperature controller.
TI = Temperature indicator.
PI = Pressure indicator.
LC = Level controller.
112
6.3- Mechanical Design Of Separator
1- Cylindrical Shell Thickness (t):
𝑝𝑖 𝐷𝑖
𝑡=
2𝑆𝐸 − 1.2 𝑝𝑖
Where,
𝑡 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑁
𝑝𝑖 = 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
Then,
𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = 𝑇𝑖 = 50 (℃) + 15 = 65 (℃)
𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 = 𝑝𝑖 = 2 (𝑏𝑎𝑟) ∗ 1.1 = 2.2 (𝑏𝑎𝑟)
From ref.[25]:
𝑁
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑆 = 125 (𝑎𝑡 65 (℃))
𝑚𝑚2
𝑁
0.22 ( ) ∗ 1300 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑚2 = 3 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑁 𝑁
(2 ∗ 125 ( ) ∗ 1) − 1.2 ∗ 0.22 ( )
𝑚𝑚2 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 3 (𝑚𝑚) + 2 (𝑚𝑚) = 5 (𝑚𝑚)
113
2- Head Thickness (t):
Choose, (tori-spherical head type) at Pi = 2.2 (bar).
0.885 𝑝𝑖 𝑅𝑐
𝑡=
𝑆𝐸 − 0.1 𝑝𝑖
Where,
𝑁
𝑝𝑖 = 0.22 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
𝐷𝑖 = 𝑅𝑐 = 1300 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑁
𝑆 = 125 ( ).
𝑚𝑚2
𝐸=1
Then,
𝑁
0.885 ∗ 0.22 ( ) ∗ 1300 (𝑚𝑚)
∴ 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑚2 = 4 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑁 𝑁
(125 ( ) ∗ 1) − 0.1 ∗ 0.22 ( )
𝑚𝑚2 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 4 (𝑚𝑚) + 2 (𝑚𝑚) = 6 (𝑚𝑚)
3- Nozzle Sizing:
For nozzle Feed (F):
𝑘𝑔
𝑚 𝐹° ) 4980 ( 𝑚3 𝑚3
° ℎ𝑟 −3
𝑉 = = = = 6.39 ( ) = 1.78 × 10 ( )
𝜌𝑓 𝜌𝑎𝑣. 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
780 ( 3)
𝑚
Where,
𝜋
𝑉° = 𝑢 ∗ 𝐴 = 𝑢 ∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
When,
𝑚
u = 2 ( ) , (𝐿𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒)
𝑠
114
Then,
−3
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
1.78 × 10 ( ) = 2 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑𝐹 )2
𝑠 𝑠 4
𝑘𝑔
𝑚 °
𝑉 617.52 ( ) 𝑚3 𝑚3
° ℎ𝑟
𝑉 = = = = 343.1 ( ) = 0.0953 ( )
𝜌𝑓 𝜌𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
1.8 ( 3)
𝑚
Where,
𝜋
𝑉° = 𝑢 ∗ 𝐴 = 𝑢 ∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
When,
𝑚
u = 15 ( ) , (𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 )
𝑠
Then,
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
0.0953 ( ) = 15 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑𝑉 )2
𝑠 𝑠 4
𝑘𝑔
𝑚 °
𝐿𝑚 4362.48 ( ) 𝑚3 𝑚3
ℎ𝑟
𝑉° = = = 3
= 5.593 ( ) = 1.56 × 10 ( )
𝜌𝑓 𝜌𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡. 𝑘𝑔 ℎ𝑟 𝑠
780 ( 3)
𝑚
Where,
𝜋
𝑉° = 𝑢 ∗ 𝐴 = 𝑢 ∗ ∗ 𝑑2
4
115
When,
𝑚
u = 1 ( ) , (𝐿𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 )
𝑠
Then,
𝑚3 𝑚 𝜋
1.56 × 10 ( ) = 1 ( ) ∗ ∗ (𝑑𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡. )2
3
𝑠 𝑠 4
Where,
𝑊𝜐 = 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 (𝑁).
𝐻𝜐 = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ (𝑚).
𝐶𝜐 = 1.15 (𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡).
𝑚 𝑚
𝑔 = 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ( 2) = 9.81 ( 2) .
𝑠 𝑠
𝑡 = 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝑚𝑚).
𝐷𝑚 = 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 (𝑚) = (𝐷 + 𝑡 × 10−3).
Then,
𝐻𝜐 = 3.77 (𝑚)
𝑡 = 𝑒 = 10 (𝑚𝑚)
𝐷𝑚 = (1.3 + 10 × 10−3) = 1.31 (𝑚)
116
5- Weight Of Fluid (Material) (𝑾𝒇):
Where,
And,
𝑘𝑔
Fluid density (max.) = 780 ( ) = 𝜌𝑓
𝑚3
So,
𝜋
𝑉𝑓 = ∗ (1.3)2 ∗ 1.42 = 1.89 (𝑚3 )
4
Then,
𝑊𝑓 = 𝑉𝑓 ∗ 𝜌𝑓 ∗ 𝑔
𝑘𝑔 𝑚
𝑊𝑓 = 1.89 (𝑚3 ) ∗ 780 ( ) ∗ 9.81 ( ) = 14461.9 (𝑁)
𝑚3 𝑠2
117
6- Bracket Support Design (supported on legs):
From [ref.25]:
𝐹𝑏𝑠 = 60 𝐿𝑐 𝑡𝑐
Where,
𝑊 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
𝐹𝑏𝑠 = =
4 4
When,
D = diameter = 1.3 (m)
Then,
W = 230 KN (maximum weight) [25]
Take,
NO. of brackets = 4 & 𝑡𝑐 = 20 (𝑚𝑚)
230 (𝐾𝑁)
𝐹𝑏𝑠 = = 57.5 (𝐾𝑁); (𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑡)
4
118
6.3.1- Cost For Separator
For Vertical shell:
Where,
H = reactor height = 3.77 (m).
D = reactor diameter = 1.3 (m).
119
Figure (6.3) Vertical pressure vessels. Time base mid – 1998.[25]
120
6.3.2- Control For Separator
CV = Control valve.
FC = Flow controller.
FI = Flow indicator.
TC = Temperature controller.
TI = Temperature indicator.
PI = Pressure indicator.
LC = Level controller.
121
7- References
122
8- Pyrolysis And Catalytic Cracking Of Municipal Plastic Waste FOR
RECOVERY OF GASOLINE RANGE HYDROCARBONS
https://core.ac.uk/reader- pyrolysis - catalytic cracking /53188820
13 - Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste for the production of liquid fuels for
engines† , RSC Advances
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/catalytic-pyrolysis-plastic-
waste-f
14- Obtaining Fuels from Plastic Waste , Rima Ingle, Rahul Masal, Atul Gargade
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282909600_POLYFUEL_-
_Thermolysis_of_waste_plastics_to_produce_liquid_fuel
123
16- Production of High Grade Liquid Fuel from waste plastic
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/PRODUCTION_OF_HIGH_GRADE_
LIQUID_FUEL_FOR_DI-CI_ENGINE_BY_PRROLYSIS_OF_Waste-Plastic
24- Robert H. Perry ; Perry's chemical engineers' handbook. — 7th Edition, 1998
Published By. McGraw-Hill, Professional Hardcover
124
25- J.M. Coulson; Chemical Engineering; Vol.6; 1985; R.S. Sinnott Co.
26- N.S. Perry; Chemical Engineer’s handbook; 6th edn; 1986; pegamon press.
Co.
27- J.H. harker; process plant design; 1979; Jhon – Matclape Co.
28- J.M. Coulson; Chemical Engineering; vol.2; 1984; R.S. Sinnott Co.
30- Ronald E. West; plant design and economics for chemical Engineers; 5 th edn
; 2005; Maxs peters Co.
31- J.M. Coulson; Chemical Engineering; Vol.6; 1998; R.S. Sinnott Co.
32- Smith; introduction to chemical Eng. thermodynamics; 6th edn; Jhon Matclape
co. 1998.
33- Smith; Chemical Reaction Kinetics; 4th edn; 1985; Jhon willey & son Co.
34- Ranald w. missen; Chemical Reaction engineering & kinetics; Jhon wiley
(USA);1999.
35- Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste for the production of liquid fuels foe
engines; by research gate net.
125