Indian Chemical Sector Catalysts For Growth in Place HSIE 20221
Indian Chemical Sector Catalysts For Growth in Place HSIE 20221
0
The Indian chemical industry continues to be an attractive hub of opportunities, even in an
environment of global uncertainty. The uniqueness of the chemical industry is that it
requires both the creation of tangible assets and technical manpower. We believe domestic
chemical companies have abundant opportunities to partner in technology. Chemical
companies may be able to take advantage of a variety of opportunities by strategically
investing in research & development (R&D). New opportunities in the form of
collaboration with technically advanced global companies could emerge in the industry.
Instead of being sold based on their chemical identity, specialty chemicals are frequently
sold based on how well they perform in the intended application. Therefore, the business
requires significant application development and R&D investments to stay relevant.
The chemical industry’s growth is not hostage to any one economic parameter or any one
end-user industry. Rising domestic demand and the need to evolve have forced domestic
chemical companies to expand their capacities to remain competitive. Our positive stance
on the sector is backed by its strong growth, aided by diversity in terms of chemistries
and/or technologies. We maintain BUY on Aether Industries, Neogen Chemicals, Navin
Fluorine, Galaxy Surfactants, NOCIL, Aarti Industries, ADD on SRF, Fine Organics,
Sudarshan Chemical, while maintain SELL on Deepak Nitrite, Vinati Organics and Alkyl
Amines. We are also initiating coverage on Ami Organics Ltd (TP: INR 1,160) with a BUY
and Clean Science and Technology Ltd (TP: INR 1,230) with a SELL recommendation.
Nilesh Ghuge
[email protected]
+91-22-6171-7342
Indian chemical companies considered by us has grown at a 10% CAGR over Sudarshan Chemical 28.4 3.0
FY10-22. For our coverage universe, we expect Capex to grow at a 17% CAGR Vinati Organics 39.7 8.1
over FY22-24E. The aggregate Capex to gross profit ratio (capital intensity ratio)
for 28 listed Indian chemical companies, which has increased from 13% in FY15
to 20% in FY22. In our coverage universe, we expect a Capex to gross profit ratio Nilesh Ghuge
of 27% in FY24E. Most of the speciality chemical companies are looking to [email protected]
diversify their portfolio and introduce innovative products that garner better +91-22-6171-7342
realisations and margins.
Harshad Katkar
Unlocking the value of knowledge [email protected]
Indian chemical companies have consistently invested in R&D and have reaped +91-22-6171-7319
the benefits in terms of innovative, more efficient, and value-added products.
Owing to their consistent investments in building R&D infrastructure, Indian Rutvi Chokshi
chemical companies have reaped benefits in terms of value-added products, [email protected]
efficient processes, foray into newer chemistries and global recognition. We +91-22-6171-7356
believe this trend to continue in the future, which will allow them to grab import
substitution and export opportunities and sustain growth. Akshay Mane
[email protected]
+91-22-6171-7338
HSIE Research is also available on Bloomberg ERH HDF <GO> & Thomson Reuters
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Story in charts
Exhibit 1: Capex has grown at a 16% CAGR over FY15-22 Exhibit 2: Capex intensity of Indian chemical companies over
in the domestic chemical industry the years
Capex (INR bn)-LHS YoY %-RHS Capex/Gross profit%
140 60.0 25%
50.0 21%
120 20%
18% 19%
40.0 20%
100
30.0
13% 13% 14%
80 20.0 15% 13%
60 10.0
0.0 10%
40
-10.0
20 -20.0 5%
- -30.0
0%
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY22
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY21
Source: Company, HSIE Research | The Capex here refers to Source: Company, HSIE Research | The Capex here refers to
aggregate cap-ex incurred by 30 domestic chemical companies aggregate cap-ex incurred by 28 domestic chemical companies
considered by us. considered by us.
Exhibit 3: Indian chemical industry’s capital intensity vs. the Exhibit 4: Indian chemical companies are focused on
globe developing their R&D infrastructure
Capital spending as a % of value-added (%) R&D expense (INR mn)-LHS YoY %-RHS
CY2010 CY2020
7,000 40
39.7
50.0
29.5
6,000
26.9
26.4
40.0 30
23.3
21.0
20.8
20.3
19.9
19.8
19.6
19.1
16.0
15.8
30.0 5,000
13.0
12.8
12.7
12.1
20
9.6
20.0
7.8
4,000
10.0 10
0.0 3,000
0
Latin America
China
NAFTA*
EU27
Japan
South Korea
Rest of Europe**
India
Rest of the
Rest of Asia***
2,000
world
1,000 -10
0 -20
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Cefic. Facts and figures 2022 | * North American Free Trade Source: Company, HSIE Research | The R&D expense here refers to
Agreement, ** Rest of Europe covers Switzerland, Norway, Turkey, aggregate R&D expenses incurred by 21 domestic chemical companies
Russia and Ukraine; *** Asia excluding China, India, Japan and South considered by us.
Korea. | The value added at factor costs is the gross income from
operating activities after adjusting for operating subsidies and indirect
taxes. Value adjustments (such as depreciation) are not subtracted.
Exhibit 5: R&D spends by recently listed Indian chemical Exhibit 6: R&D spending in the chemical sector: India vs
companies the globe
Average R&D spend as a % of revenue from Global chemical R&D mix %
FY20-22 %
6.0% 5.0% CY2010 CY2020
5.0%
40.0
29.3
4.0%
24.2
3.0% 2.3%
22.5
22.2
1.6% 30.0
19.7
2.0%
16.9
16.3
1.0%
0.6% 0.8% 0.8%
14.9
4.8
3.8
3.8
Anupam Rasayan
Clean Science
Laxmi Organic
Chemcon
Neogen Chemicals
Fine Organics
Tatva Chintan
Ami Organics
Aether Industries
3.3
10.0
2.8
2.8
2.3
1.5
1.4
0.7
0.4
0.0
EU27
USA
UK
Switzerland
Japan
South Korea
Brazil
China
India
Rest of the
world
Source: Company, HSIE Research Source: Cefic, Facts and figures 2022
Page | 2
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Table of contents
Opportunities for Indian chemical companies ......................................... 4
Strong pipeline in Indian speciality chemical sector ............................... 6
Investing in capabilities and capacities; Capex ........................................ 8
Unlocking the value of knowledge; R&D................................................ 10
Land parcel availability—a key growth factor ....................................... 13
Companies
Ami Organics Ltd ........................................................................................ 14
Clean Science and Technology Ltd........................................................... 25
Page | 3
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 5
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 6
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 7
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
120 50.0
40.0
100
30.0
80 20.0
60 10.0
0.0
40
-10.0
20 -20.0
- -30.0
FY16
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research | The Capex here refers to aggregate capex incurred by 30 domestic
chemical companies considered by us. Capex = Purchase of fixed assets - sale of fixed assets +
investment in subsidiaries + advances for capital expenditure.
Page | 8
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Clean Science plans to incur over INR 3bn over FY23-24, which shall be used to
manufacture pharma and agrochem intermediates and hindered amine light stabilizers
(HALS).
India continues to be one of the leading countries in the world in capital spending
intensity (Capex as a percentage of value added, which is gross income from operating
activities after adjusting for operating subsidies and indirect taxes) in the chemical
space. As per Cefic, In CY20, India's chemical sector attributed 19.8% of its PAT to
Capex, whereas China's chemical sector attributed 29.5%.
Exhibit 8: India has maintained its capital intensity over the past decade
Capital spending as a % of value-added (%)
CY2010 CY2020
39.7
50.0
29.5
26.9
26.4
40.0
23.3
21.0
20.8
20.3
19.9
19.8
19.6
19.1
16.0
15.8
30.0
13.0
12.8
12.7
12.1
20.0 9.6
7.8
10.0
0.0
China
Latin America
EU27
NAFTA*
Japan
South Korea
Rest of Europe**
India
Rest of Asia***
We have also calculated the aggregate Capex to gross profit ratio (capital intensity
ratio) for 28 listed Indian chemical companies, which has risen from 13% in FY15 to
20% in FY22. This increase in the ratio indicates that companies are positive about their
future opportunities, and in order to tap them, they are increasing their capacities. In
our coverage universe, we expect a Capex to gross profit ratio of 27% in FY24E.
Exhibit 9: Capex intensity of Indian chemical companies grew from 13% in FY15
to 20% in FY22
Capex/Gross profit%
25%
21%
20%
18% 19%
20%
10%
5%
0%
FY22
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
Source: Company, HSIE Research | The Capex here refers to aggregate cap-ex incurred by 28 domestic
chemical companies considered by us. Cap-ex = Purchase of fixed assets - sale of fixed assets +
investment in subsidiaries + advances for capital expenditure.
Page | 9
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
7,000 40
6,000 30
5,000
20
4,000
10
3,000
0
2,000
1,000 -10
0 -20
FY19
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research | The R&D expense here refers to aggregate R&D expenses incurred
by 21 domestic chemical companies considered by us.
The average R&D expenditure as a % of revenue for the 21 leading Indian chemical
companies considered by us (excluding the recently-listed companies, which are Tatva
Chintan, Laxmi Organic, Chemcon, Aether Industries, Neogen Chemicals, Fine
Organics, Clean Science, Ami Organics and Anupam Rasayan) has remained ~0.6% p.a.
from FY15-22. The aggregate R&D expenditure incurred by these companies
(excluding the recently-listed companies) has grown by a 13% CAGR over FY12-22,
ahead of their revenue CAGR of 9% over the same period. INR 5.9bn was spent in FY22
by these companies on R&D as compared to INR 1.8bn in FY12.
Navin Fluorine spent ~2.4% of its revenue on R&D activities in FY22. The company
expanded its research capacities in Dewas by adding an analytical validation
laboratory facility along with the increase in its team of scientists. Capex of INR 0.7bn
is approved for further augmenting R&D and establishing a pilot facility at Surat. Aarti
Industries spent ~1.7% of its revenue on R&D in FY22. The company is focusing on
improving its product mix toward higher value-added segments, which shall increase
its presence in the key regulated markets and improve the growth curve. The key
contributors to these will be R&D and innovation driven initiatives, where the
company has more than 40 products for speciality chemicals and more than 50
products for pharma segments in its pipeline.
Exhibit 11: R&D spends by recently listed Indian chemical companies
Average R&D spend as a % of revenue from FY20-22
6.0% 5.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0% 2.3%
1.6%
2.0% 0.8% 0.8% 1.0%
0.4% 0.6%
1.0% 0.1%
0.0%
Laxmi Organic
Industries
Chemicals
Chemcon
Clean Science
Fine Organics
Tatva Chintan
Ami Organics
Anupam
Rasayan
Neogen
Aether
Page | 10
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Sinopec
Ineos
Linde
BASF
Dow
Huntsman
Industries
Solvay
Clariant AG
Lanxess
Syngenta
Evonik
Source: Company, HSIE Research
We have also calculated average R&D expenditure as a % of revenue for the recently-
listed companies, which has remained ~1.4% p.a. in the last three years. Companies are
augmenting their research capabilities in order to be ahead of the curve and create their
own niche in the industry. Aether Industries spent ~6.7% of its revenue on R&D in
FY22. The company’s technical prowess and advanced R&D capabilities have led to
significant innovation, which creates significant barriers for new entrants. Ami
Organics spent ~1.4% of its revenue on R&D in FY22. The company focuses on
consistent research-driven innovation and keeps a pipeline of products ready that are
expected to be launched in 10-15 years. This gives the company a first mover advantage
and secures its place in the drug master files (DMFs) of its customers. Clean Science’s
backbone is its R&D infrastructure, which has led to its success. The company is one of
the few companies in India that manufactures its own catalysts for its manufacturing
processes and also targets clean and green chemistries.
Exhibit 13: R&D investments, one of the key contributors to margin expansion
EBIT margin (%)
25%
20% 20%
20% 18%
16%
15%
14%
15%
10%
5%
0%
FY17
FY22
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
Source: Company, HSIE Research | Note: These are the EBIT margins of the following companies of our
coverage: Alkyl Amines, Navin Fluorine, Galaxy Surfactants, Vinati Organics, SRF, Aarti Industries,
Sudarshan Chemical, NOCIL, Fine Organics, Deepak Nitrite and Neogen Chemicals
Indian chemical companies are also expanding their R&D teams to ensure that they
have the right talent to lead the company towards innovative products, chemistries
and technologies. India has a big advantage compared to the other countries as it has
a skilled talent pool that is available at a lower cost than in other countries.
Page | 11
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
India's share in the aggregate R&D spending incurred over the globe by chemical
companies has grown from 2.8% in CY10 to 3.8% in CY20. What is worthy of attention
is that only India's, China's and South Korea's shares have grown during this period.
Indian chemical companies are trying to match their R&D capabilities with their global
peers’, which will help them move up in their value chain.
The global chemical industry is also taking note of the value leadership demonstrated
by the Indian chemical manufacturers by focusing on R&D, process engineering,
developing capabilities of handling complex chemistries, etc. These enablers have
changed the perception of the Indian chemicals manufacturers, which has led to higher
business enquires and demand from global players.
Exhibit 15: R&D spending in the chemical sector: India vs the globe
Global chemical R&D mix %
%
CY2010 CY2020
29.3
40.0
24.2
22.5
22.2
19.7
30.0
16.9
16.3
14.9
20.0
6.5
4.8
3.8
3.8
3.3
2.8
2.8
2.3
1.5
1.4
10.0
0.7
0.4
0.0
USA
UK
EU27
Switzerland
Japan
Brazil
China
South Korea
India
Page | 12
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 13
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
The company develops its products sometimes even when they have not been
launched by the originator, and gives their samples to API manufacturers
worldwide. The API manufacturers, after studying the company’s molecules,
develop their API and file their DMF with Ami Organics’ product as a key raw
material. Early engagement with its customers leads to Ami Organics becoming a
preferred supplier by them.
DMF being a regulatory document, creates an entry barrier for the company’s
competition. The company has nurtured enduring relationships with domestic
clients as well as multinational corporations (MNCs) across large and fast growing
markets globally. The company’s supply contracts with key customers span long
periods of time. 13 out of over 160 of the company’s customers have been
customers since the past ten years and 50 of its customers have been customers
since the past five years. The company’s key products have captured 50-90% of the
global market share, owing to the company’s early mover advantage.
Page | 14
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 15
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
regular doses. The company’s top 5 product lines come from antidepressant,
anticoagulant, anti-parkinson, anti-retroviral and anti-diabetic therapeutic areas.
Exhibit 18: Business model of the advanced pharma intermediates business
The company’s customer mix in this business segment includes some marquee
names such as Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Organike, Sun Pharma, Zydus,
Laurus Labs, Cipla, Dr. Reddy’s, Lupin, etc.
The company’s R&D team is spearheaded by Dr. Sanjay Vasoya who holds a
doctorate and master’s degree in organic chemistry. He was previously associated
with Teva Pharmaceuticals, Alembic Pharmaceuticals and Rubamin
Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Ajit Choubey holds an advisory role in the company and has
previously worked with Ipca Laboratories. Ami Organics’ R&D team is led by
distinguished people in the chemical industry who ensure that the company is
constantly working towards innovative practices and products.
Page | 16
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Ami Organics is capable of executing complex reactions and has expertise in flow
reaction, enzymatic reaction, high temperature catalytic reaction, high vacuum
and high temperature distillation, etc. The company is 90% backwardly integrated
over all its products.
The company has 380 new products in its pipeline for its advanced pharmaceutical
intermediates business that provides it growth visibility till FY35. This impressive
product pipeline is a fruit of the company’s R&D capabilities that creates a huge
competitive edge for it. We believe that Ami Organics has an edge over its peers
for its consistent research-driven innovation that allows it to keep a pipeline of
products ready which will be launched 10-15 years down the line.
Exhibit 20: Lab equipment at the company’s R&D center
Equipment No. of equipment installed
Fume hoods with temperature sensor 26
Gas chromatographer (GC) 05
Gas chromatographer-HS 01
Gas chromatographer-MS 01
Liquid chromatographer (LC)-MS 01
High performance liquid chromatographer (HPLC) 09
Continuous Flow Vapor Phase Catalytic Fixed Bed Reactor 04
Continuous Flow Micro Channel Reactor 01
Continuous Flow 3D Mix Tube Reactor 01
Continuous Plug Flow Reactor, Tube in tube & Coil Type 01
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 17
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
The company has some marquee customers in its speciality chemicals business
such as Sun Pharma, Reliance Industries, Bayer, Huntsman, Himalaya, Transmare
Chemie, etc.
It wants the speciality chemicals business to contribute ~35% to its total revenues
in the next two to three years. Ami Organics is taking all the steps required to grow
its speciality chemicals business by increasing efficiencies, launch of new products,
adoption of new technology and increasing the wallet share of its customers.
Exhibit 21: Manufacturing facilities of Ami Organics
Facility Area (sq mtrs) Capacity (MTPA)
Sachin Unit 8,250 2,460
Ankleshwar Unit* 10,644 N/A
Jhagadia Unit 56,998 3,600
Warehouse - Sachin 2,812 1,050
Source: Company, HSIE Research | *Note: Currently, the Ankhleshwar site has been demolished. The new
plant will be set up at Ankhleshwar site to cater to the growing demand of advance pharmaceutical
intermediates
Page | 18
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
The company has developed electrolyte additives, which are mainly used as a solid
electrolyte interface (SEI), which is an integral ingredient in an electrolyte solution.
The two products that the company has developed are vinylene carbonate and
fluoroethylene carbonate.
Currently, the company’s products are with various customers in China, Korea,
India and Europe for approval, with some of the customers in an advanced stage
of qualification, and the company expects revenue to flow from this business in
H1CY23. It has already acquired a land parcel in Sachin, Surat for the future
expansion of the electrolyte business. As of now, the company’s capacity in its
Jhagadia unit is enough to cater to the initial demand for these products and if it
sees good traction from its customers, it will establish a dedicated plant for this
business.
The global market opportunity of this business is expected to reach USD 2bn in
CY28, and Ami Organics plans to capture 10% of this market.
Exhibit 22: Industry analysis of the electrolyte additives business
10,000 % 60.0
8,000 50.0
40.0
6,000
30.0
4,000
20.0
2,000 10.0
0 0.0
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY25E
FY23E
FY24E
Page | 19
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
100% 6 5 4
14 7 3 3
3 5
1 18 18 22 22
80%
60%
85 91 88
40% 77 78 75 75
20%
0%
FY22
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
Source: Company, HSIE Research
80% 42%
48% 53% 47%
60%
40%
52% 58%
50% 46%
20%
0%
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
45%
40% 38%
35%
29%
30% 27% 28%
26% 26%
24%
25%
20%
20%
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Page | 20
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
FY25E
FY23E
FY24E
FY20
FY22
FY19
FY21
Source: Company, HSIE Research
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
FY24E
FY25E
FY23E
FY20
FY22
FY19
FY21
0.40
0.20
0.0
0.00
FY24E
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY19
Page | 21
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Exhibit 31: Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) positive from FY25
Operating cash flow (INR mn) Free cash flow to the firm (INR mn)
1,500
1,000
500
-500
-1,000 FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY20
FY21
FY22
160 4.0%
120 3.0%
100 2.5%
80 1.9% 2.0%
1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%
60 1.5%
40 1.0% 1.0%
20 0.5%
0 0.0%
FY24E
FY25E
FY23E
FY19
FY22
FY20
FY21
Page | 22
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Financials (Consolidated)
INCOME STATEMENT
INR mn FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E FY25E
Revenues 2,385 2,396 3,406 5,201 6,360 7,581 9,261
Growth % 0.5 42.1 52.7 22.3 19.2 22.2
Raw Material 1,484 1,289 1,795 2,728 3,365 3,960 4,810
Employee Cost 117 178 210 414 490 548 603
Other Expenses 363 519 599 1,008 1,270 1,440 1,760
EBITDA 421 410 802 1,052 1,236 1,633 2,089
EBIDTA Margin (%) 17.6 17.1 23.5 20.2 19.4 21.5 22.6
EBITDA Growth % (2.5) 95.4 31.2 17.5 32.1 27.9
Depreciation 26 35 42 101 126 171 210
EBIT 395 375 760 951 1,109 1,462 1,879
Other Income 4 28 14 28 31 32 33
Interest 48 56 56 64 1 4 7
PBT (before EO item) 351 348 717 915 1,140 1,490 1,904
Exceptional Income / Expenses - - - - - - -
PBT 351 348 717 915 1,140 1,490 1,904
Tax 118 73 177 195 292 375 479
RPAT 233 275 540 719 848 1,115 1,425
APAT 233 275 540 719 848 1,115 1,425
APAT Growth (%) 17.9 96.6 33.2 17.8 31.5 27.8
AEPS 6.4 7.5 14.8 19.7 23.3 30.6 39.1
AEPS Growth % 17.9 96.6 33.2 17.8 31.5 27.8
Source: Company, HSIE Research
BALANCE SHEET
INR mn FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E FY25E
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Share Capital 105 105 315 364 364 364 364
Reserves And Surplus 717 1,013 1,354 4,858 5,579 6,526 7,738
Total Equity 822 1,118 1,669 5,223 5,943 6,891 8,102
Minority Interest - - - - - - -
Long-term Debt 221 199 726 6 6 106 106
Short-term Debt 261 339 445 - - - -
Current maturities of LT debt 57 56 195 3 3 3 3
Total Debt 539 594 1,366 8 8 108 108
Deferred Tax Liability 21 31 33 63 64 65 66
Long-term Provision and others 11 24 44 4 4 5 5
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 1,394 1,768 3,112 5,298 6,020 7,069 8,282
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
Net Block 788 852 1,863 2,045 2,741 3,663 4,027
Capital WIP 20 117 2 30 207 364 191
LT Loans And Advances 67 122 91 205 209 214 218
Total Non-current Investments 16 17 14 17 17 18 18
Total Non-current assets 891 1,109 1,970 2,297 3,175 4,259 4,454
Inventories 387 523 604 1,122 1,372 1,635 1,997
Debtors 761 564 1,207 1,637 2,002 2,386 2,915
Cash and Cash Equivalents 5 38 27 996 488 50 531
Other Current Assets 88 85 325 537 553 570 587
Total Current Assets 1,241 1,210 2,162 4,291 4,414 4,641 6,030
Creditors 684 514 844 1,184 1,460 1,719 2,088
Other Current Liabilities & Provns 54 37 176 106 109 112 115
Total Current Liabilities 738 551 1,020 1,291 1,569 1,830 2,202
Net Current Assets 503 659 1,142 3,001 2,845 2,810 3,828
TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS 1,394 1,768 3,112 5,298 6,020 7,069 8,282
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 23
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
KEY RATIOS
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E FY25E
PROFITABILITY %
Gross profit margin 37.8 46.2 47.3 47.5 47.1 47.8 48.1
EBITDA Margin 17.6 17.1 23.5 20.2 19.4 21.5 22.6
EBIT Margin 16.6 15.6 22.3 18.3 17.4 19.3 20.3
APAT Margin 9.8 11.5 15.9 13.8 13.3 14.7 15.4
RoE 28.3 28.3 38.7 20.9 15.2 17.4 19.0
RoIC N/A 20.1 24.5 20.4 17.3 18.3 19.8
RoCE 19.0 20.2 23.9 18.3 15.0 17.1 18.6
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate % 33.7 21.0 24.7 21.3 25.6 25.2 25.2
Fixed Asset Turnover (x) 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1
Inventory (days) 59 80 65 79 79 79 79
Debtors (days) 116 86 129 115 115 115 115
Other Current Assets (days) 14 13 35 38 32 27 23
Payables (days) 168 146 172 158 158 158 158
Other Current Liab & Provns (days) 8 6 19 7 6 5 5
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 13 27 38 65 61 57 54
Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.3 1.4 1.7 (0.9) (0.4) 0.0 (0.2)
Net D/E 0.6 0.5 0.8 (0.2) (0.1) 0.0 (0.1)
Interest Coverage 8.3 6.7 13.5 14.8 1,877.7 384.8 266.6
PER SHARE DATA (INR)
EPS 6.4 7.5 14.8 19.7 23.3 30.6 39.1
CEPS 7.1 8.5 16.0 22.5 26.7 35.3 44.9
Dividend N/A N/A N/A 3.0 3.5 4.6 5.9
Book Value 22.6 30.7 45.8 143.3 163.1 189.1 222.4
VALUATION
P/E (x) 155.2 131.6 66.9 50.2 42.6 32.4 25.4
P/Cash EPS (x) 139.6 116.6 62.1 44.1 37.1 28.1 22.1
P/BV (x) 44.0 32.3 21.7 6.9 6.1 5.2 4.5
EV/EBITDA (x) 87.2 89.5 46.8 33.4 28.9 22.2 17.1
EV/Revenue (x) 15.4 15.3 11.0 6.8 5.6 4.8 3.9
Dividend Yield (%) N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
OCF/EV (%) N/A 0.6 0.4 (0.0) 1.7 2.4 3.0
FCFF/EV (%) N/A 0.1 (2.2) (0.9) (1.1) (1.1) 1.9
FCFE/M Cap (%) N/A 0.1 (0.2) (4.8) (1.1) (0.8) 1.8
Inventory/revenue % 16 22 18 22 22 22 22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 24
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
HALS 701 and 770 have a similar chemistry but different applications. HALS 701
is used for water purification and as a stabilizer in the monomer industry. HALS
770 is used by all master batches in India and is imported ~3,000-4,000 tons per
annum to India, and the company’s first set of capacity is 2,000 tons. Hence, even
after being a part of the HALS series, different HALS have different applications,
customers and target varied geographies.
CSTL would be the first Indian company to manufacture HALS in the domestic
market. The company plans to become a key player in this segment within 3-4
years of its launch. Initially, the company wants to cater to the domestic market
and grab the import substitution opportunity.
CSTL has also incorporated a new subsidiary, Clean Fino-Chem Limited (unit-4
facility), where it plans to introduce other lines of HALS series in the coming years.
The company has allocated a Capex of INR 3bn for HALS in unit-4 and expects the
commercial production to commence next year.
The global market size for HALS is estimated to be USD ~1bn, and is growing at a
~10% CAGR. BASF is the biggest player globally in the HALS series. Owing to the
high energy prices in Europe, BASF has announced price hikes a few times already
Page | 25
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
in their entire HALS segment. While energy prices have gone up for CSTL too, they
haven’t gone up as much as for a European producer or an American producer.
This delta shall increase CSTL’s price competitiveness and in turn garner new
customer interest. Furthermore, the inhouse developed catalyst that CSTL uses to
produce HALS series is less costly than the catalyst used by BASF.
(Refer to Annexure for more information on HALS).
The company’s unique and innovative chemistries and strong plant engineering
capabilities have enabled it to maximise atom economy and avoid usage of
hazardous raw materials and, hence, increase efficiencies and yields in its
processes.
CSTL uses a novel catalyst to manufacture anisole from phenol using the vapour
phase technology. It further conducts hydroxylation of anisole to produce
monomethyl ether of hydroquinone (MEHQ) and guaiacol. This unique
manufacturing route has led to CSTL becoming one of the largest manufacturers
of anisole, MEHQ and guaiacol in the world.
The company has emerged as the global market leader in five products and
second-largest global player in four products out of its portfolio of nine products
(Refer Exhibit-33). CSTL’s processes ensure high levels of backward as well as
forward integration.
R&D forms the backbone of CSTL as it bolsters process innovation. CSTL has a
R&D team of 70 people. The company focuses its R&D efforts on three core areas:
(1) new product development largely in the performance chemicals segment where
India does not have a large global presence, (2) continuously improving yields and
efficiencies of existing processes, and (3) developing new intermediates that can
address import substitution.
We believe that the company’s constant focus on process innovation shall lead to
a robust product pipeline as well as improve yield of its existing products.
However, the company will have to run fast on the so called innovation treadmill
to come up with newer catalytic processes to ensure success, which is a key
monitorable, going ahead.
Page | 26
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 27
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Siddharth Sikchi, executive director, holds a master’s degree in science from the
University of Manitoba in Canada and a bachelor’s degree in technology from the
Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. He has over fifteen years of experience
in the chemical industry. He looks after the R&D and marketing operations of the
company.
Krishna Boob, executive director, has over two decades of experience in the
chemical industry and looks after purchase and public relations for CSTL.
Parth Maheshwari, vice president, has over six years of experience in the chemical
industry and looks after some of the business operations.
CSTL also has some distinguished people on its board, including Prof. G D Yadav
and Pradeep Rathi. Prof. G D Yadav is a chemical engineer, inventor and academic,
known for his research on nanomaterials, gas absorption with chemical reaction
and phase transfer catalysis. Pradeep Rathi, chairman, holds a bachelor’s degree in
science from University of Poona and a master’s degree of science in chemical
engineering practice from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US. He is also
the promoter of Sudarshan Chemicals.
CSTL benefits from the guidance of its leaders and this has led to venturing into
better products, processes and garnered confidence of customers as well as of
investors.
Page | 28
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
2,000 10.0
0 0.0
FY24E
FY25E
FY23E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Page | 29
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
100% 0 0 0 0 0 2 5
13 12 7
14 16 17 11 10 10
80% 17 17 20
22 18 16 21 20
60%
40%
66 68 71 71 68 69 70
64
20%
0%
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
100%
31% 29%
80%
40%
69% 71%
20%
30% 26% 30%
0%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
76%
80%
69% 67%
70% 63% 62% 61%
56%
60% 53%
50%
40%
25% 25% 23%
30% 23% 22% 23% 22% 22%
20%
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Page | 30
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
FY24E
FY23E
FY25E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
FY24E
FY25E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
-0.10 -0.1
-0.1
-0.15 -0.1
-0.2
-0.20
-0.2
-0.25
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Page | 31
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
Source: Company, HSIE Research
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
-500
FY23E
FY24E
FY25E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY25E
FY19
FY21
FY20
FY22
Page | 32
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
HALS are transparent to visible light and are assumed to dissipate the absorbed
energy in a harmless manner, that is, by converting the absorbed photon energy
into heat without being chemically affected.
HALS are effective in poly olefins, polyethylene and polyurethane but they are
ineffective in PVC.
Page | 33
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Financials (Consolidated)
INCOME STATEMENT
INR mn FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E FY25E
Revenues 2,411 3,933 4,193 5,124 6,849 9,735 12,146 14,666
Growth % 63.1 6.6 22.2 33.7 42.1 24.8 20.7
Raw Material 1,134 1,712 1,292 1,236 2,247 3,602 4,676 5,720
Employee Cost 160 249 310 436 345 432 518 596
Other Expenses 382 609 738 863 1,258 1,801 2,186 2,566
EBITDA 734 1,363 1,853 2,590 2,999 3,900 4,766 5,784
EBIDTA Margin (%) 30.5 34.7 44.2 50.5 43.8 40.1 39.2 39.4
EBITDA Growth % 85.7 35.9 39.8 15.8 30.1 22.2 21.4
Depreciation 76 110 137 172 249 365 488 590
EBIT 658 1,253 1,716 2,417 2,750 3,536 4,277 5,194
Other Income (Including EO Items) 45 113 109 256 300 170 173 177
Interest 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
PBT 703 1,365 1,823 2,673 3,048 3,705 4,450 5,370
Tax 214 389 427 689 763 928 1,114 1,344
PAT 489 977 1,396 1,984 2,285 2,778 3,336 4,026
EO (Loss) / Profit (Net Of Tax) - - - - - - - -
APAT 489 977 1,396 1,984 2,285 2,778 3,336 4,026
Share from associates - - - - - - - -
Minority Interest - - - - - - - -
Consolidated APAT 489 977 1,396 1,984 2,285 2,778 3,336 4,026
Consolidated APAT Growth (%) 99.7 43.0 42.1 15.2 21.6 20.1 20.7
AEPS 4.6 9.2 13.1 18.7 21.5 26.1 31.4 37.9
AEPS Growth % 99.7 43.0 42.1 15.2 21.6 20.1 20.7
Source: Company, HSIE Research
BALANCE SHEET
INR mn FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E FY25E
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Share Capital 14 14 13 106 106 106 106 106
Reserves And Surplus 1,864 2,706 3,408 5,290 7,578 9,936 12,768 16,186
Total Equity 1,879 2,721 3,421 5,397 7,684 10,043 12,875 16,292
Minority Interest - - - - - - - -
Long-term Debt 1 1 3 3 3 - - -
Short-term Debt 5 25 24 - 1 1 1 1
Total Debt 6 26 27 3 3 1 1 1
Deferred Tax Liability 102 139 102 176 209 209 209 209
Long-term Provision and others 2 3 3 4 1 1 1 1
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 1,988 2,888 3,553 5,579 7,898 10,254 13,086 16,503
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
Net Block 1,024 1,270 1,656 1,858 2,957 4,424 5,893 6,918
Capital WIP 15 39 34 550 441 610 653 538
Other non-current assets 73 40 39 239 145 145 145 145
Non-current Investments - - - - - - - -
Total Non-current assets 1,111 1,349 1,729 2,648 3,544 5,179 6,691 7,601
Inventories 290 370 346 529 881 1,253 1,563 1,887
Debtors 397 598 698 742 1,535 2,183 2,723 3,288
Cash and Cash Equivalents 295 94 93 157 747 812 1,573 3,497
Other Current Assets 268 863 1,433 2,523 2,540 2,616 2,694 2,775
Total Current Assets 1,250 1,926 2,570 3,951 5,703 6,863 8,553 11,447
Creditors 264 223 357 610 1,021 1,451 1,811 2,187
Other Current Liabilities & Provns 109 163 389 410 327 337 347 358
Total Current Liabilities 373 386 746 1,020 1,348 1,789 2,158 2,544
Net Current Assets 877 1,539 1,825 2,932 4,355 5,075 6,395 8,903
TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS 1,988 2,888 3,553 5,579 7,898 10,254 13,086 16,503
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 34
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
KEY RATIOS
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E FY25E
PROFITABILITY %
Gross Margin 53.0 56.5 69.2 75.9 67.2 63.0 61.5 61.0
EBITDA Margin 30.5 34.7 44.2 50.5 43.8 40.1 39.2 39.4
EBIT Margin 27.3 31.9 40.9 47.2 40.1 36.3 35.2 35.4
APAT Margin 20.3 24.8 33.3 38.7 33.4 28.5 27.5 27.5
RoE N/A 42.5 45.5 45.0 34.9 31.3 29.1 27.6
RoIC N/A 40.4 42.5 43.2 35.6 34.1 32.6 33.4
RoCE N/A 40.1 43.4 43.5 33.9 30.6 28.6 27.2
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate % 30.4 28.5 23.4 25.8 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
Fixed Asset Turnover (x) 1.8 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7
Inventory (days) 44 34 30 38 47 47 47 47
Debtors (days) 60 55 61 53 82 82 82 82
Other Current Assets (days) 41 80 125 180 135 98 81 69
Payables (days) 85 48 101 180 166 147 141 140
Other Current Liab & Provns (days) 17 15 34 29 17 13 10 9
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 43 107 81 61 81 67 58 49
Net Debt/EBITDA (x) (0.4) (0.1) (0.0) (0.1) (0.2) (0.2) (0.3) (0.6)
Net D/E (0.2) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Interest Coverage 626.8 3,796.2 1,418.0 2,656.6 1,870.5 N/A N/A N/A
PER SHARE DATA (INR)
EPS 4.6 9.2 13.1 18.7 21.5 26.1 31.4 37.9
CEPS 5.3 10.2 14.4 20.3 23.9 29.6 36.0 43.4
Dividend N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.3 4.0 4.7 5.7
Book Value 17.7 25.6 32.2 50.8 72.3 94.5 121.2 153.4
VALUATION
P/E (x) 328.1 164.3 114.9 80.9 70.2 57.8 48.1 39.8
P/Cash EPS (x) 284.0 147.6 104.6 74.4 63.3 51.0 41.9 34.8
P/BV (x) 85.4 59.0 46.9 29.7 20.9 16.0 12.5 9.8
EV/EBITDA (x) 218.1 117.6 86.5 61.9 53.2 40.9 33.3 27.1
EV/Revenue (x) 66.4 40.8 38.2 31.3 23.3 16.4 13.1 10.7
Dividend Yield (%) N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4
OCF/EV (%) N/A 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.5 1.9 2.5
FCFF/EV (%) N/A (0.1) 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.5
FCFE/M Cap (%) N/A (0.1) 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.5
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 35
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Page | 36
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Cement: WHRS – A key cog in the Autos: Where are we on “S” curve? FMCG: Defensive businesses but Autos: A changed landscape Banks: Double whammy for some India Equity Strategy: Atma Indian IT: Demand recovery in
flywheel not valuations Nirbhar Bharat sight
Life Insurance: Recovery may be Retail: Whole flywheel is broken? Appliances: Looing beyond near- Pharma: Chronic therapy – A Indian Gas: Looking beyond the India Equity Strategy: Quarterly Real Estate: Ripe for consumption
swift with protection driving term disruption portfolio prescription pandemic flipbook
margins
Indian IT: expanding centre of Indian Chemical: Evolution to Life Insurance: ULIP vs. MF Infrastructure: On the road to Cement: Spotting the sweet spot Pharma: Cardiac: the heartbeat of Life Insurance: Comparative
gravity revolution! rerating domestic market annual report analysis
Indian microfinance: Should you India Equity Strategy: Quarterly Autos: Divergent trends in PVs and India Internet: the stage is set FMCG: Opportunity in adversity - Logistics: Indian Railways - getting Industrials: Triggering a new cycle
look micro as macros disappoint? flipbook 2Ws A comparative scorecard aggressive
Indian IT: raising the bar India Equity Strategy: Quarterly FinTech Playbook: P2M Payments India Hospitals: capital discipline Autos: Will EVs impact the ‘EV’? Cement: Riding High Power: Reforms essential for
flipbook | Surging pool, dwindling yields improving, sustenance is key rennaissance
Fashion & Lifestyle: From a India Equity Strategy: Quarterly Indian Gas Sector: Resilience in the Consumer Durables: Fans - a Quarterly flipbook: Q2FY22– FinTech Playbook: Discount Footwear: No bargains here!
disruptor’s lens II flipbook eye of the storm compounding story but underrated Demand environment improves Brokers
but input cost inflation dents
profitability
Holdcos for portfolio Cement: A concrete road for net- FinTech Playbook: Buy Now Pay India Equity Strategy: PLI: Power: Shifting energy landscape: IT sector: Decoding signal from Vehicle Financing: Secular
diversification zero emissions Later | De-mystifying the Spearheading India’s Grey to green gains pace noise opportunity meets cyclical
tablestakes manufacturing push tailwinds
Health Insurance 1.0: Advantage India Equity Strategy - Capex: on a India City Gas Sector: Weathering
SAHIs sustainable upswing the ‘Perfect Storm’
Page | 37
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
1200 2500
1000
2000
800
1500
600
1000
400
500
200
0 0
Dec-21
Dec-22
Aug-22
Mar-22
Nov-22
Jan-22
Apr-22
Jun-22
Jul-22
Sep-22
Feb-22
May-22
Oct-22
Dec-22
Dec-21
Aug-22
Mar-22
Jun-22
Nov-22
Jan-22
Apr-22
Jul-22
Sep-22
Feb-22
May-22
Oct-22
Rating Criteria
BUY: >+15% return potential
ADD: +5% to +15% return potential
REDUCE: -10% to +5% return potential
SELL: > 10% Downside return potential
Page | 38
Chemical: Sector Thematic 2.0
Disclosure:
We, Nilesh Ghuge, MMS, Harshad Katkar, MBA, Rutvi Chokshi, CA & Akshay Mane, PGDM authors and the names subscribed to this report, hereby certify
that all of the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect our views about the subject issuer(s) or securities. SEBI conducted the inspection and based
on their observations have issued advise/warning. The said observations have been complied with. We also certify that no part of our compensation was, is, or will
be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendation(s) or view(s) in this report.
Research Analyst or his/her relative or HDFC Securities Ltd. does have/ does not have any financial interest in the subject company. Also Research Analyst or his
relative or HDFC Securities Ltd. or its Associate may have beneficial ownership of 1% or more in the subject company at the end of the month immediately preceding
the date of publication of the Research Report. Further Research Analyst or his relative or HDFC Securities Ltd. or its associate does have/does not have any material
conflict of interest.
Any holding in stock - No
HDFC Securities Limited (HSL) is a SEBI Registered Research Analyst having registration no. INH000002475.
Disclaimer:
This report has been prepared by HDFC Securities Ltd and is solely for information of the recipient only. The report must not be used as a singular basis of any
investment decision. The views herein are of a general nature and do not consider the risk appetite or the particular circumstances of an individual investor; readers
are requested to take professional advice before investing. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment advice. Each recipient of this document
should make such investigations as they deem necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in securities of the companies referred to in this
document (including merits and risks) and should consult their own advisors to determine merits and risks of such investment. The information and opinions
contained herein have been compiled or arrived at, based upon information obtained in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. Such information has not
been independently verified and no guaranty, representation of warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All such
information and opinions are subject to change without notice. Descriptions of any company or companies or their securities mentioned herein are not intended to
be complete. HSL is not obliged to update this report for such changes. HSL has the right to make changes and modifications at any time.
This report is not directed to, or intended for display, downloading, printing, reproducing or for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or
resident or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, reproduction, availability or use would be contrary to
law or regulation or what would subject HSL or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.
If this report is inadvertently sent or has reached any person in such country, especially, United States of America, the same should be ignored and brought to the
attention of the sender. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, for any purposes or in any
manner.
Foreign currencies denominated securities, wherever mentioned, are subject to exchange rate fluctuations, which could have an adverse effect on their value or
price, or the income derived from them. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, the values of which are influenced by foreign currencies effectively assume
currency risk. It should not be considered to be taken as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
This document is not, and should not, be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This report
should not be construed as an invitation or solicitation to do business with HSL. HSL may from time to time solicit from, or perform broking, or other services for,
any company mentioned in this mail and/or its attachments.
HSL and its affiliated company(ies), their directors and employees may; (a) from time to time, have a long or short position in, and buy or sell the securities of the
company(ies) mentioned herein or (b) be engaged in any other transaction involving such securities and earn brokerage or other compensation or act as a market
maker in the financial instruments of the company(ies) discussed herein or act as an advisor or lender/borrower to such company(ies) or may have any other
potential conflict of interests with respect to any recommendation and other related information and opinions.
HSL, its directors, analysts or employees do not take any responsibility, financial or otherwise, of the losses or the damages sustained due to the investments made
or any action taken on basis of this report, including but not restricted to, fluctuation in the prices of shares and bonds, changes in the currency rates, diminution
in the NAVs, reduction in the dividend or income, etc.
HSL and other group companies, its directors, associates, employees may have various positions in any of the stocks, securities and financial instruments dealt in
the report, or may make sell or purchase or other deals in these securities from time to time or may deal in other securities of the companies / organizations described
in this report.
HSL or its associates might have managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company or might have been mandated by the subject company
for any other assignment in the past twelve months.
HSL or its associates might have received any compensation from the companies mentioned in the report during the period preceding twelve months from t date
of this report for services in respect of managing or co-managing public offerings, corporate finance, investment banking or merchant banking, brokerage services
or other advisory service in a merger or specific transaction in the normal course of business.
HSL or its analysts did not receive any compensation or other benefits from the companies mentioned in the report or third party in connection with preparation
of the research report. Accordingly, neither HSL nor Research Analysts have any material conflict of interest at the time of publication of this report. Compensation
of our Research Analysts is not based on any specific merchant banking, investment banking or brokerage service transactions. HSL may have issued other reports
that are inconsistent with and reach different conclusion from the information presented in this report.
Research entity has not been engaged in market making activity for the subject company. Research analyst has not served as an officer, director or employee of the
subject company. We have not received any compensation/benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the Research Report.
HDFC securities Limited, I Think Techno Campus, Building - B, "Alpha", Office Floor 8, Near Kanjurmarg Station, Opp. Crompton Greaves, Kanjurmarg (East),
Mumbai 400 042 Phone: (022) 3075 3400 Fax: (022) 2496 5066
Compliance Officer: Murli V Karkera Email: [email protected] Phone: (022) 3045 3600
HDFC Securities Limited, SEBI Reg. No.: NSE, BSE, MSEI, MCX: INZ000186937; AMFI Reg. No. ARN: 13549; PFRDA Reg. No. POP: 11092018; IRDA Corporate
Agent License No.: CA0062; SEBI Research Analyst Reg. No.: INH000002475; SEBI Investment Adviser Reg. No.: INA000011538; CIN - U67120MH2000PLC152193
Mutual Funds Investments are subject to market risk. Please read the offer and scheme related documents carefully before investing.
HDFC securities
Institutional Equities
Unit No. 1602, 16th Floor, Tower A, Peninsula Business Park,
Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400 013
Board: +91-22-6171-7330 www.hdfcsec.com
Page | 39