Scribd
Upload
160 views2 pages

Rubrics For Video Presentation (30 Points)

The document provides rubrics for evaluating video presentations with criteria in three areas: Content and Discussions (30 points), Organization (30 points), and Delivery (30 points). A well-organized presentation with thorough, detailed discussions receives the highest scores. The introduction should state the topic and provide an overview, while the conclusion should be strong. For Delivery, the highest scores go to a presentation with clear purpose and eye contact that emphasizes points with appropriate volume and pacing and enthusiasm.

Uploaded by

Julia Marie Condolon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
160 views2 pages

Rubrics For Video Presentation (30 Points)

The document provides rubrics for evaluating video presentations with criteria in three areas: Content and Discussions (30 points), Organization (30 points), and Delivery (30 points). A well-organized presentation with thorough, detailed discussions receives the highest scores. The introduction should state the topic and provide an overview, while the conclusion should be strong. For Delivery, the highest scores go to a presentation with clear purpose and eye contact that emphasizes points with appropriate volume and pacing and enthusiasm.

Uploaded by

Julia Marie Condolon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Rubrics for Video Presentation (30 POINTS)

CRITERIA 10-8 7-6 5-4 3-2 1

Discussions are well organized, Discussions are organized, Discussions are partially Discussions provide some Discussions are
Content, & thorough, detailed, and clear. provide some details and organized, provide some details and some parts are not interrelated
Discussions are clear. details and some parts are clear. and not
clear. connected. Some
topics are
irrelevant.
The introduction is inviting,
states the main topic, and The introduction states the The introduction states the There is no clear No clear cohesion
provides an overview of the main topic and provides an main topic. A conclusion is introduction, structure, or of the statements;
paper. Information is relevant overview of the paper. A included conclusion. no clear transition
and presented in a logical order. conclusion is included. from one part to
Organization The conclusion is strong. another.
The speaker’s purpose of The speaker’s purpose of The writer’s purpose of The author’s purpose of
presenting a video output is very presenting a video is presenting a video is writing is unclear, reads Speech was
clear, maintains eye contact to somewhat clear, the speaker somewhat clear, the speaker the speech without taking delivered in a
convey a clear message, uses has minimal eye contact, reads the speech a few a glance at the audience, monotonous or
appropriate volume of voice to and can clearly speak. times, pacing is too low or pacing is not robotic manner.
emphasize points and with Pacing is easy to follow. The too fast. The speech is understandable.
proper pacing. There’s great delivery of the speech has delivered in an
Delivery enthusiasm and intonation in the enthusiasm. uninteresting tone.
speech.
Prepared by:

RONALD B. SARSABA ANA MARIA BELINDA YTING NIZZA L. VILLAHERMOSA


Faculty Faculty Faculty

ADAMJO MENDEZ NORRY P. MAGLENTE


Faculty Faculty

Noted:

SHELLA A. TORRALBA, MA
CHAIR, Department of Communication and Humanities

You might also like