Person-Centered Therapy Guide
Person-Centered Therapy Guide
Introduction
FIRST PERIOD
In the first period, during the 1940s, Rogers developed what was known as nondirective
counseling, while he was a professor at Ohio State University, Rogers published the “Counseling
and Psychotherapy: Newer Concepts in Practice” which described the philosophy and practice of
nondirective counseling.
Rogers also challenged the validity of commonly accepted therapeutic procedures such as
advice, suggestion, direction, persuasion, and any other therapeutic concepts or procedures that
therapists think will help their client because, in Rogers’s conviction, these diagnostic concepts
were inadequate, prejudicial, and often misused by the therapists that’s why he omitted these in
his approach. Nondirective counselors avoided sharing a great deal about themselves with
clients and instead focused mainly on reflecting and clarifying the client’s verbal and nonverbal
communication.
SECOND PERIOD
During the 1950's, Rogers wrote the “Client-Centered Therapy.” This period was characterized by
a shift from clarification of feelings to a focus on the phenomenological world of the client. He
focused more explicitly on the actualizing tendency as the basic motivational force that leads to
client change.
ACTUALIZING TENDENCY – an innate drive to grow as individuals and to achieve their full potential.
THIRD PERIOD
Began in the late 1950s and extended into the 1970s, addressing the necessary and sufficient
conditions of therapy. A significant publication was “On Becoming a Person,” which addressed
the nature of “becoming the self that one truly is,” an idea he borrowed from Kierkegaard.
In this book, he described the process of “becoming one’s experience,” which is characterized by
an openness to experience, a trust in one’s experience, an internal locus of evaluation, and the
willingness to be in the process.
FOURTH PERIOD
Because of Rogers’s ever-widening scope of influence, including his interest in how people
obtain, possess, share, or surrender power and control over others and themselves, his theory
became known as the “person-centered approach.” The person-centered approach has been
applied mainly to individual and group counseling, important areas of further application include
education, family life, leadership & administration, organizational development, health care,
cross-cultural and interracial activity, and international relations.
During the 1980s, Rogers directed his efforts toward applying the person-centered approach to
politics, especially to efforts related to the achievement of world peace.
Existentialists tend to acknowledge the stark realities of human experience and their writings are
often focused on death, anxiety, depression, and isolation.
Humanists take the somewhat less anxiety-evoking position and more optimistic view that each
of us has a natural potential that we can actualize and through which we can find meaning.
Abraham Maslow (1970) was a pioneer in the development of humanistic psychology and was
influential in furthering the understanding of self-actualizing individuals. Many of Carl Rogers’s
ideas, especially on the positive aspects of being human and a fully functioning person are built
on Maslow’s basic philosophy.
Maslow criticized Freudian Psychology because he only saw the negative side of human nature.
He believes that too much research was being conducted on anxiety, hostility, and neuroses and
too little on joy, creativity, and self-fulfillment. That’s why self-actualization was the central
theme of the work of Abraham Maslow.
Maslow studied what he called “self-actualizing people” and found that they differed in
important ways from so-called normal individuals. The core characteristics of self-actualizing
people are self-awareness, freedom, basic honesty and caring, and trust and autonomy. All these
personal characteristics have been identified by Rogers as being central to the person-centered
philosophy.
Maslow postulated a “hierarchy of needs” as a source of motivation with the basic needs being
physiological needs. For instance, if we are hungry and thirsty, our attention is riveted on
meeting these basic needs. Next are the safety needs, which include a sense of security and
stability. Once our physical needs are fulfilled, we become concerned with meeting our needs for
belonging and love, followed by working on our need for esteem.
- according to Rogers, if therapists communicate these attitudes, those being helped will become
less defensive and more open to themselves and their world, and they will behave in prosocial
and constructive ways.
Brodley (1999) writes about the actualizing tendency, a directional process of striving toward
realization, fulfillment, autonomy, and self-determination. The person-centered approach
rejects the role of the therapist as the authority who knows best and of the passive client who
merely follows the beliefs of the therapist.
In the person-centered approach, the emphasis is on how clients act in their world with others,
how they can move forward in constructive directions, and how they can successfully deal with
obstacles that are blocking their growth. Humanistic therapists emphasize a discovery-oriented
approach in which clients are the experts on their own inner experiences.
they encourage clients to make changes that will lead to living fully and authentically, with the
realization that this kind of existence demands a continuing struggle. Maslow taught us that
becoming self-actualizing individuals is an ongoing process rather than a destination.
THERAPEUTIC GOALS
Rogers (1961) wrote that people who enter psychotherapy often ask: “How can I discover my
real self? How can I become what I deeply wish to become? How can I get behind my facades
and become myself?” The underlying aim of therapy is to provide a climate conducive to helping
the individual strive toward self-actualization.
The person-centered approach aims toward the client achieving a greater degree of
independence and integration(coordinate). Its focus is on the person, not on the person’s
presenting problem. Rogers did not believe the goal of therapy was merely to solve problems.
Rather, the goal is to assist clients in their growth process so clients can better cope with
problems as they identify them. This approach minimizes directive techniques, such as
interpretation, questioning, and collecting history, whilst also minimizing active listening,
reflection of feelings, and clarification.
What happens when the facades are being put aside during the therapeutic process?
Rogers (1961), people who are becoming increasingly actualized are (1) open to experience, (2)
trust in themselves, (3) have an internal source of evaluation, and (4) willing to continue
growing. Person-centered therapists agree on the matter of not setting goals for what clients
need to change, yet they differ on how to best help clients achieve their own goals and to find
their own answers (Bohart & Watson, 2011).
THERAPIST’S FUNCTION AND ROLE
Therapists use themselves as an instrument of change. When they encounter the client on a
person-to-person level, their “role” is to be without roles. It is the therapist’s attitude and belief
in the inner resources of the client that creates the therapeutic climate for growth (Bozarth et
al., 2002).
The therapist serves as a guide and partner to the client, focusing especially on treating the
client with “unconditional positive regard” (i.e., genuine care and acceptance) while remaining
empathic and keeping their own personality and opinions out of the way. The focus is on the
client rather than on the therapist's interpretation of the client, and this can be freeing for the
client, who is not subject to someone else's often misguided opinions. The therapist
concentrates instead on helping the client identify their own feelings, questions, concerns, and
issues. The therapist fully encourages the client to express themselves without fear of judgment.
Person-centered theory holds that the therapist’s function is to be present and accessible to
clients and to focus on their immediate experience. By being congruent, accepting, and
empathic, the therapist is a catalyst for change. Through the therapist’s attitude of genuine
caring, respect, acceptance, support, and understanding, clients can loosen their defenses and
rigid perceptions.
Instead of viewing clients in preconceived diagnostic categories, the therapist meets them on a
moment-to-moment experiential basis and enters their world. When these therapist attitudes
are present, clients then have the necessary freedom to explore areas of their lives that were
either denied awareness or distorted.
One reason clients seek therapy is a feeling of basic helplessness, powerlessness, and inability to
make decisions or effectively direct their own lives. However, in the person-centered
framework, clients soon learn that they can be responsible for themselves in the relationship
and that they can learn to be freer by using the relationship to gain greater self-understanding.
As counseling progresses, clients can explore a wider range of beliefs and feelings. With therapy,
people distort less and move to a greater acceptance and integration of conflicting and
confusing feelings. Individuals in therapy come to appreciate themselves more as they are, and
their behavior shows more flexibility and creativity.
As clients feel understood and accepted, they become less defensive and become more open to
their experience. Because they feel safer and are less vulnerable, they become more realistic,
perceive others with greater accuracy, and become better able to understand and accept
others. They become less concerned about meeting others’ expectations and thus begin to
behave in ways that are truer to themselves. These individuals direct their own lives instead of
looking outside of themselves for answers. They move in the direction of being more in contact
with what they are experiencing now, less bound by the past, less determined, freer to make
decisions, and increasingly trusting in themselves to manage their own lives.
Their experience in therapy is like throwing off the self-imposed shackles that had kept them in
a psychological prison. Person-centered therapy is grounded on the assumption that it is clients
who heal themselves, who create their own self-growth, and who are active self-healers (Bohart
& Tallman, 1999, 2010; Bohart & Watson, 2011).
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THERAPIST AND CLIENT
CONGRUENCE
Implies that therapists are real; that is, they are genuine, integrated, and authentic during the
therapy hour. They are without a false front, their inner experience and outer expression of that
experience match, and they can openly express feelings, thoughts, reactions, and attitudes that
are present in the relationship with the client. Through authenticity the therapist serves as a
model of a human being struggling toward greater realness.
Therapists value and warmly accept clients without placing stipulations on their acceptance. It is
not an attitude of “I’ll accept you when...” rather, it is one of “I’ll accept you as you are.”
Therapists communicate through their behavior that they value their clients as they are and that
clients are free to have feelings and experiences. Acceptance is the recognition of clients’ rights
to have their own beliefs and feelings; it is not the approval of behavior.
According to Rogers’s (1977) research, the greater the degree of caring, accepting, and valuing
of the client in a no possessive way, the greater the chance that therapy will be successful.
Accurate empathic understanding implies that the therapist will sense clients’ feelings as if they
were their own without becoming lost in those feelings. It is a way for therapists to hear the
meanings expressed by their clients that often lie at the edge of their awareness. A primary
means of determining whether an individual experiences a therapists’ empathy is to secure
feedback from the client (Norcross, 2010).
One of Rogers’s main contributions to the counseling field is the notion that the quality of the
therapeutic relationship, as opposed to administering techniques, is the primary agent of
growth in the client. No techniques are basic to the practice of person-centered therapy, “being
with” clients and entering imaginatively into their world of perceptions and feelings is sufficient
for facilitating a process of change. Techniques may be suggested when doing so fosters the
process of client and therapist being together in an empathic way.
Traditional person-centered therapists would not tend to suggest a technique (Bohart &
Watson, 2011). What is essential for clients’ progress is the therapist’s presence, being
completely attentive to and immersed in the client as well as in the client’s expressed concerns
(Cain, 2010). This way of being is far more powerful than any technique a therapist might use to
bring about change. Qualities and skills such as listening, accepting, respecting, understanding,
and responding must be honest expressions by the therapist.
Today, those who practice a person-centered approach work in diverse ways that reflect both
advances in theory and practice and plethora of personal styles. If we strive to model our style
after Rogers, and if that style does not fit for us, we are not being ourselves and we are not
being fully congruent.
Bozarth, Zimring, and Tausch (2002) cite studies done through the 1990s that revealed the
effectiveness of person-centered therapy with a wide range of client problems including anxiety
disorders, alcoholism, psychosomatic problems, agoraphobia, interpersonal difficulties,
depression, cancer, and personality disorders. The person-centered approach has been applied
extensively in training both professionals and paraprofessionals who work with people in a
variety of settings.
The person-centered approach emphasizes the unique role of the group counselor as a facilitator
rather than a leader. The primary function of the facilitator is to create a safe and healing
climate, a place where the group members can interact in honest and meaningful ways. Group
members make their own choices and bring about change for themselves. Yet with the presence
of the facilitator and the support of other members, participants realize that they do not have to
experience the struggles of change alone and that groups as collective entities have their own
source of transformation.
The role of the facilitator is to empathically understand what an individual is communicating
within the group. Instead of leading the members toward specific goals, the group facilitator
assists members in developing attitudes and behaviors of genuineness, acceptance, and
empathy, which enables the members to interact with each other in therapeutic ways to find
their own sense of direction as a group.
Natalie Rogers (1993, 2011) expanded on her father, Carl Rogers’s theory of creativity using the
expressive arts to enhance personal growth for individuals and groups. Rogers’s approach,
known as “expressive arts therapy,” extends the person-centered approach to spontaneous
creative expression, which symbolizes deep and sometimes inaccessible feelings and emotional
states. Counselors trained in person-centered expressive arts offer their clients the opportunity
to create movement, visual art, journal writing, sound, and music to express their feelings and
gain insight from these activities.
According to Natalie Rogers, this deep faith in the individual’s innate drive to become fully
oneself is basic to the work in person-centered expressive arts. Individuals have a tremendous
capacity for self-healing through creativity if given the proper environment. Person-centered
expressive arts therapy utilizes the arts for spontaneous creative expression that symbolizes
deep and sometimes inaccessible feelings and emotional states.
Natalie Rogers (1928-2015) was an early contributor to the field of humanistic psychology and
the founder of Person-Centered Expressive Arts. Her work in developing expressive arts therapy
expanded upon traditional views of art therapy as pertaining to drawing, painting, and sculpture
to include other modalities of art into the therapeutic process.
MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING
is a counseling technique that helps people with behavioral problems change their behavior, this
is on the idea that people are more likely to make changes if they are motivated to do so.
THE MI SPIRIT
the spirit of MI is based on 3 key elements: collaboration between the therapist and the client;
evoking or drawing out the client’s ideas about change; and emphasizing the autonomy of the
client.
The stages of change model assumes that people progress through a series of five identifiable
stages in the counseling process.
Precontemplation stage - no intention of changing a behavior pattern in the future.
Contemplation stage - people are aware of a problem and are considering overcoming it but they
have not yet made a commitment to take action to bring about the change.
Preparation stage - individuals tend to take action immediately and report some small behavioral
changes.
Action stage - individuals are taking steps to modify their behavior to solve their problems.
Maintenance stage - people work to consolidate their gains and prevent relapse.
The stages of the change model describe how an individual or organization integrates new behaviors,
goals, and programs at various levels. The five stages of the change model describe a series of changes
that people go through to change a problem behavior into maintaining a healthy behavior.
EMPHASIS ON RESEARCH
One of Rogers’s contributions to the field of psychotherapy was his willingness to state his
concepts as testable hypotheses and to submit them to research.
Cain (2010) concludes, “person-centered therapy is as vital and effective as it has ever been and
continues to develop in ways that will make it increasingly so in the years to come.”
IMPORTANCE OF EMPATHY
Person-centered therapy has demonstrated that therapist empathy plays a vital role in
facilitating constructive change in the client.
Watson’s (2002) comprehensive review of the research literature on therapeutic empathy has
consistently demonstrated that therapist empathy is the most potent predictor of client progress
in therapy.
EMOTION-FOCUSED THERAPY
One of the main criticisms of the person-centered approach is that it can be slow because the
therapist is not there to offer solutions or advice, progress may be slower than other types of
therapy.
Another potential drawback is that person-centered therapy may not be effective for everyone.
Person-centered therapy may not be appropriate for individuals with severe mental health
issues.
A potential limitation of the person-centered approach is that some students-in-training and
practitioners with this orientation may tend to be very supportive of clients without being
challenging.
A related challenge for counselors using this approach is to truly support clients in finding their
own way. Counselors sometimes experience difficulty in allowing clients to decide their own
specific goals in therapy.