EASA RemoteConditionMonitoringOverview 0622
EASA RemoteConditionMonitoringOverview 0622
Remote condition monitoring is much more than just hardware, sensors and gate- Committee Chair
ways. This overview will not only introduce you to the hardware side, but also to Justin Hatfield
the other main factors that must be considered for a successful IIoT program. This HECO — Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
overview contains sections on:
Committee Coordinator
• Maintenance Philosophies
Paul Rossiter
Takes a look at the different philosophies and IIoT’s impact on them. Energy Management Corp. — Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
• Business Models
Explores the many business models that can create success in IIoT, as well as the Committee Members
pros and cons of each approach. Lloyd Edward Clark, III
Blue Ridge Electric Service — Winchester, Virgina, United States
• Software /Data Platform
George Flolo
Explains the main factors impacting the data and software side of IIoT solutions.
The Flolo Corp. — West Chicago, Illinois, United States
• Hardware Selection
David Griffin
Illustrates sensor and gateway infrastructure and flow, as well as the many potential
plant equipment and process metrics that can be monitored. CPM Engineering, Ltd. — Trafford Park, Manchester, United Kingdom
Michael Huber
American MTS — Monroe, North Carolina, United States
Iain Jenkins
Jenkins Electric Co. — Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Thomas Schardt
Nidec Motor Corp. — St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Michael Sonsogno
Smartricity Inc. — Ballinafad, Ontario, Canada
Gene Vogel
EASA — St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Risk-Based & Maintenance and engineering • Reduces maintenance long • Requires engineering effort Advanced analytics identify areas of maximum potential savings.
Reliability-Centered to identify and eliminate failure term beyond typical maintenance May encompass all the other philosophies (e.g., could have
Maintenance modes • Extends equipment life personnel some machines that run to failure and others that are carefully
(RBM & RCM) monitored and maintained).
Maintenance using simulation • Early fault prediction • Up-front setup fees for As data collection capability increases, so does the analytical
modeling to adjust equipment • Root cause detection and hardware complexity needed to interpret the information and deploy effective
operating parameters and push elimination • Monthly monitoring fee for AI solutions. RxM is driven by prescriptive analytics, algorithms,
Prescriptive run time out beyond predicted predictions and artificial intelligence (AI) that go beyond predicting events,
• Maintenance performed only
Maintenance failure date allowing maintenance teams to explore multiple hypothetical
when needed and planned
(RxM) maintenance scenarios and simulations without having to
• No need for internal/external
experience each one in real life.
data analysis resources
• Load optimization predictions
RBM & RCM may encompass all of these
Maintenance based on • Early fault detection • Resource intensive IIoT-based PdM / CBM enables you to monitor, maintain, and
a monitored parameter • Root cause detection and • Need heavy continuous optimize assets for better availability, utilization and performance.
Predictive
(temperature, vibration, etc.) elimination analyses Real-time monitoring and notifications provide better visibility into
Maintenance
that indicates condition (with an • Maintenance performed only • Historically these functions assets, allowing you to predict failures, identify parts that need
(PdM)
IIoT spin) when needed and planned are performed via route- replacement, schedule maintenance and repairs, or take quick
a.k.a. action to extend the life of your equipment.
• Avoids unexpected based data collection
Condition-Based breakdowns • Investments in instruments,
Maintenance sensors and training
• Avoids unexpected downtime
(CBM)
• Does not always detect the
root cause
Maintenance based on time • Fewer coincidental • Unnecessary maintenance Time is not the most reliable maintenance criteria, since so
Preventive intervals breakdowns • Unnecessary maintenance many other factors can create issues for a machine. IIoT can
Maintenance • Less downtime can introduce new faults complement the PM schedule by showing machine condition
(PM) • Better than doing nothing regardless of the time since last maintenance. This may prompt
you to speed up or slow down your PM schedule.
Maintenance performed only • Maximum machine use • Lots of breakdowns You can still wait for breakdowns, but with IIoT you can see them
Run to Failure when breakdowns occur • No extra resources • Long downtime coming and be prepared.
(RTF) • Expensive repairs
• Low efficiency
PLANT SERVICES
• https://www.plantservices.com/articles/2019/what-makes-a-condition-based-maintenance-program-sink-or-swim/
UPKEEP
• https://www.onupkeep.com/learning/maintenance-types/run-to-failure-maintenance
• https://www.onupkeep.com/preventive-maintenance#types-of-preventive-maintenance
• https://www.onupkeep.com/maintenance-glossary/prescriptive-maintenance
RELIABLE PLANT
• https://www.reliableplant.com/condition-based-maintenance-31823
• https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/12494/preventive-maintenance
IT CONVERGENCE
• https://www.itconvergence.com/blog/5-benefits-iot-based-predictive-maintenance/
ACCENDO RELIABILITY
• https://accendoreliability.com/run-failure-viable-option/
-
Sell the equipment and /or • Power transmission (PT) houses • Easy to get started • Lots of competition
• EASA Member
software. Generally an upfront • Motor OEMs • Shorter sales cycle • Upfront costs
Hardware/ provides less
purchase of equipment and a • Sensor manufacturers
Software Sales value
minor software fee per month /
• IIoT firms • Lots of
year.
competition
• Less risk to the
PROGRESSION
Hardware and software costs • Sensor manufacturers • No upfront costs • Clients not used to EASA Member
per month (recurring) with • IIoT firms subscriptions
Subscription
little or no upfront costs,
similar to leasing equipment.
Monitoring and analyzing data • Vibration analysis providers • Selling a service • Loss of internal
Consulting/Data gathered by sensors and then • Customers’ internal vibration teams (higher margins) vibration analysis
Analytics applying your expertise. • EASA member can jobs
validate findings
+
can encompass a win/win provides more
scenario in the package. value
• Customer is tied
Only pay when the equipment • Facilities management providers • Customer only pays • Many variables for to you
Power by the
is running. Provider supplies • OEMs when a machine is why a machine may • Less competition
Hour /Equipment
not only the sensor and online be offline • More risk to the
as a Service
software but also the rotating EASA Member
(EaaS)
equipment it is installed on.
NOTES
NOTES
• • Variations
Variations/uniqueness
/uniqueness — —There
Thereare
arecountless
countlessways
waystotocombine
combineand andcreate
createhybrid
hybridbusiness
businessmodels
modelsofofall
allofofthese.
these.TheTheEASA
EASAmember
memberhashasthe
theunique
uniqueability
abilitytotoprovide
providehands-on
hands-onservice
serviceand
andcorrective
correctiveactions.
actions. Consider
Consider partneringpartnering with someone
with someone that one
that provides provides onebusiness
of these of these models
businessbutmodels
may notbuthave
may anot have a presence
business business presence in your geographic
in your geographic area. area.
• • Data
Dataintegration
integration——Whether
Whetherorornot
notdata
dataintegrates
integratesinto
intoother
othercustomer
customerinternal
internalsystems
systemsmaymaybebeaafactor
factorininallallofofthese
thesemodels.
models.
• Guarantees — Any of these models can include guarantees of varying complexity (e.g., uptime
• Guarantees — Any of these models can include guarantees of varying complexity (e.g., uptime guarantees). guarantees).
DATA PLATFORM*