REPORT by CPCB DATED 14.07.2020 in OA NO. 67 of 2019 and 138 of 2019 (Sumit Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. and Amarjeet Kumar S. Union of India & Ors.)
REPORT by CPCB DATED 14.07.2020 in OA NO. 67 of 2019 and 138 of 2019 (Sumit Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. and Amarjeet Kumar S. Union of India & Ors.)
 s.                                    Particulars                                           Page
 No.                                                                                          No.
  1.   Compliance Report (Third Report covering status as on 14.07.2020)
       in compliance to Hon'ble NGT orders dated 28.03.2019 and 04.07.2019
       in the matter of O.A. No. 67/2019 and 138/2019; titled as Sumit Kumar
       Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh     & Ors. With Arnarjeet Kumar Vs. Union
       of India   & Ors. before Hon'ble NGT, PB, New Delhi.
 2.    Annexure-I:        Direction    issued         by   CPCB    to    the      Chief
       Secretaries/ Administrators    of   States      Governments/Union       Territory
       Administrations.
                                                                                    (Nazimuddin)
                                                                                      Scientist 'E'
                                                                  Central Pollution Control Board,
                                                             Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar,
                                                                                     Delhi-110032
Place: Delhi
Date: 14.07.2020
        Compliance Report on Hon'ble NGT order dated 28.03.2019 and 04.07.2019
                      in O.A. No. 67/2019 and O.A. No. 138/2019
                 (Updated Third Report, covering status as on 14.07.2020)
In compliance of Hon'ble NGT order dated 28.03.2019 and 04.07.2019 in O.A No. 67/2019
and O.A. No. 138/2019, CPCB issued directions under Section 5 of the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986 to the Chief Secretaries/ Administrators of States Governments/Union
Territory Administrations vide letter dated 23.08.2019 (Annexure-1), directing as below:
State Governments/UT Administrations were asked to submit action taken report on above to
CPCB through their SPCBs/PCCs within one month i.e. by 23 09.2019 and reminder e-mails
were sent on 1909.2019, 01.10.2019, 11.10.2019, 23.10.2019, 08.11.2019, 20.11.2019 and
27.12.2019. Based on the ATRs received from SPCBs/PCCs, CPCB submitted a report
dated-03.01.2020 covering the status upto 31.12.2019. Hon'ble NGT considered the report
and vide order dated-07.01.2020 further directed as follows:
         "13 States which have still not furnished their respective ATRs in pursuance of
        direction of the CPCB dated 23.08.2019 may do so positively within one month. If
        there is non-compliance after 31.03.2020, the defaulting States will be liable to
        pay compensation at the rate Rs. 1 lakh per month from 01.04.2020 till
        compliance. "
 CPCB vide e-mail/letter dt- 14 01 .2020, 06 03.2020 and 20.03.2020further informed SPCBs
 to submit action taken report. Eight more SPCBs have submitted action taken report on
 CPCB's directions. Thus, ATRs have been submitted by total 27 States/UTs on CPCB's
 direction dated 23.08.2019, whereas ATR from the remaining 05 States/UTs is awaited.
                                                                                               i   1
                                           SPEED POST
B-33014/07 /'.!0'19/lPC-11/      5;,-1..r,t --S~1-'f>                              i\ LI g LI l 2:',, 20 [ ()
To,
       The Chief Secret4dministrators,
       Govern me dst}t~~j'union Territories
       (As per st enclosed -1)
Sub:    Directions under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 regarding
        preparing a policy on use of Pet coke & Furnace oil.
        WHEREAS, rising pollution is a matter of serious concern. esp eciallv high lc·vl'h c1!
particulate matter exceeding National ambient air quality standards, 2009; and
        WHEREAS, pet coke and furnace oil / fuel oil (FO) emit more S02 as compared lP othvr
conventional fuels due to high sulphur content and also contribute to forming of finer secondary
particulate matter in ambient air, which form ii significant fractions of PM (Pl\-11,1 &· Pl\ 1: ·,); .md
        WHEREAS, l lon'ble Supreme Court ol India passed vide dated 24.10.20 I 7 in Writ f'vlilion
(Civil) 13029 / 19R5, banne l use of PPt coke and furnace oil in industries in the NC!{ ~L,1lt' ell
Harvana, Urtarl radesh and Rajasrhan. Accordingly, Central Pollution Control Board ;it Ih« behest
        WHEREAS, Hon'ble Supreme Court passed subsequent orders dated                            r-u :Z.2(rJ7,
05.02.2018, 26.07.2018, 09.'102018 in the above writ petition; and
        WHEREAS, Hon'ble Supreme .ourt in above mentioned order dated O0.10.'.?.ll lH noted
CPCB's report regarding use of pet coke as feed stock in CFC units wherein it was recormur-udcd
that due to emission of S02 in high concentrations the emissions need to be treated in FCD systems
having removal efficiency more than 90% and also noted that the views expressed by CI'CB hav,,
been considered by tvloEF&CC which is in agreement with the CPCB; and
         WHEREAS, for filling r 'Sp nse in cases O.A. No. 67 of 2l119 Sum it Kumar V :-; Sl,lll' ol
Hirnachal Pradesh & Ors. and O.A. No. 138 of 2019 Amarjeet Kumar Vs Union of l nd ia & l"lrs i11
Hon'ble National Cre n Tribunal, CPCB n!quested all stales governments vidc t rn,,il daled
01.02,2019 to pro ide details of measures tnken for banning use of pet coke and furn<1(1-· ()i I in their
state as suggested by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 17.11.20] 7; c1nd
                                                                                                                2-   i   2
         WHEREAS, Honb le National Creeu Tribunal passed Order dated 28 l13.:2tll9 in U .. ·\ No.
 67r>f 1019 and 0.A. No. 138 of :2019, noting the brief on the above Supreme Court urd,.·rs
 n,:gMding pct coke ,md furnace t il provided hy CPCB, and diredin5 CPCB tu issue a11prPpri.ite
 dirt·chons in this regard lo LhP concerned States and l.luion Ierrrtories indic<1lin3 ,\H'r, iv«
 measures against those who foil to comply with the dirvctions: nnrl
         WHEREAS, Hou'ble National Green Tribunal passed further Order dated 04.07 20 J li ill
 above cases, directing CPCB again to proceed to take further action in the matter (as alreadv
 directed bv Order dated 28.03.2019); and                                                    ·
         WJ-IEREAS, the matter was discussed by CPCB with oil refinery representative on
 20.05.2019 wherein it was informed that it is technically pn-;sil,l,• to produu;, low sulphur, iii likt·
 slurry oil, LSHS, LDO by refineries and that ii demand of FO is reduced, the refineries will have
 to convert it either into pet coke by installing cocker, or into bitumen by enhancing rnp.i,ity c·,!
 V6U which may require minimum one-vear lime, or will have to export it; and
         \.VfIEREAS, as per notification no. SO. 844 (E) dated 19th November 1986 undur i.t1l1
rule 3 of rule 3, the standards for emission or discharge of environmental pollutants spL~<'ified
under sub-rule (1) or sub-rule j.l) shall be complied with b\ an industrv, oper.ilion or i•n,u--.•.
within d period of one year of being so specified; and
        NOW, THEREFORE, in view the above and in exercise of the powers vested under
Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, following directions are issued:
   l. Slatv Government / Union Tt:rritory Administr.ition sh,ill formulate and enlon v ltwl
      poli1·y regMrlin8 use nf pd coke ;ind HJ in the Stale/ LIT in light of Vill'ious order<; i'"-;~,t·d
      by Supreme Court regMding usp of pet coke and FO in \Vril Petition (C) 13029 /19~'>.
   ,., State Government/ Unhm Territory Administr,,liun lliwugl1 respPctive SPCB/PCl sh.ill
       take strict action t1gainst any industry if found violatinf, the Juel policy on use of f'l-'l cokP
       and FO that will be enforced as above, using llie pcrwPI", cunforred under envinJ11111l'H!.1!
      f,l\\'S.
Action takl~Il n~pl)rl sh<1ll be subrnitted through SPCB/PCC by SL1te/UT within one nwnlh i.l'
by 23.09.:2019.
                                                                                             (S.f'.S. l)rtrih,1r)
                                                                                                   Chairman
                                                                                              \1~\
                                                                                                                    3
Copy to:
   1. The Chai rm an
      SPCBs / PCCs
      (As per I i st enclosed - 2)
                                                                                                     4
                                                                                                                                     (
        ,
                                                                          -
  2            Arunachal Pradesh               Chief Secretary     Covernment of Arunachal Pradesh
                                                                   Civil Secretariat
                                                                   1t,ma1}lr - 791111
--- --·--·. I
                                                                                                                                         5
r-;        Madhya Pradesh    Chief Secretary               Government of Madh ,a Prad · 11
                                                                                                         ,
2_        Tamil Nadu
                                                  --   I
                            Chief St·cretrlry              Covorruneru of Tamil Nadu
                                                           Se .retariat. Chcnnai -
                                                           600009
                                                                                                                            6
                                                                                                                                             (
                                                               -·-··-
         Union Territory of Dadra    Adminis.rarn.                          Secn~larial. Moti. Silvasa. D,1111,m - 39h220
28
         and
         Nagar Haveli
         Union Territory of Daman &. Administrator                          Secretarial, Moti,
29
         Dilt                                                                Dr1n1<1n - 3% 220
'I
                                                                                                                                                 7
I
                                                                                                                                                                 8
                                                                                                                                                ,,,
                                                                                                                                                          9
,
     4.   The Renion,11
                  0
                            Director
          Central Pollution Control Board
          Par ive sh Bh aw an. Opp. VtvlC Ward Office No. 10
          Subh a np u r a , Vadodara - 390 023
     6.    The Regional Di r e c to r
           Central Pollution Control Board
           "TUM-SIR", Lower Mo t ln a g a r
           Near fire l.higode 1-1.(J.,
           Shillong - 793 014
                                                                              \0
                                                                             -if   10
                                                                               Annexure -   II
      Summary of the Action Taken by States/UTs in compliance toDirections Issued for
                   Preparing Policy on Use of Petcoke and Furnace Oil
                                                                                            )1    11
                                              is allowed in regulated conditions with ermssion
                                              standards for Sulphur Dioxide at 400 mf/Nm3 and
                                              with CTO by SPCB.
 17.    Sikkim        29.09.2019 Notification issued on 22.03.2018 for prohibiting sale and
                                 use of petcoke and FO as fuel in the State.
 18.   Tamil Nadu     20.09.2019 SPCB has informed vide letter dt. 20.09.2019 that:
                                   1. Cement Plant is only permitted to use petcoke as fuel in
                                      their Cement Kiln after examining case by case and all
                                      other industrial units which have used petcoke as fuel are
                                      stopped as per TNPCB directions issued during Sept 2017.
                                   2. There is no restriction on use ofFO by the industries.
                                   3. Cement Industries which are usmg petcoke and the
                                      industries usmg FO should comply with prescribed
                                      emission standards.
 19.   Telangana     09.10.2019    SPCB has informed that State Govt. has decided that petcoke
                                   as fuel does not require to be prohibited in the State subject
                                  to installation of air pollution control system by and
                                  compliance of emission norms. As of now, TSPCB has
                                  permitted only Cement Plants for use of petcoke while
                                  issuing CFO & HWA
20.    Tripura       07.09.2019   Notification issued on 0103.2018 for complete ban and
                                  prohibition on the use of pet coke and FO.
21.    Uttarakhand   23.03.2020   SPCB has informed vide e-mail dated-23 .03 .2020 that Draft
                                  Fuel Policy is prepared and is under approval of Chairman,
                                  PCB.
22.    UT of         04.10.2019 None of the industry is using petcoke and FO in the UT.
       Andaman and
       Nicobar
23.    UT of         25.10.2019   None of the industry is using petcoke. The policy regarding
       Chandigarh                 FO is under consideration that no industry will be allowed to
                                  use FO after 06 months.
24. UTofDaman        14.10.2019   None of the industries permitted to use petcoke. Use of PO is
    &Diu                          permitted subject to compliance of 30 meters stack height
25. UT ofDadra                    criteria and industry equipped with APCDs for control of
    and                           ermssion.
    Nagar Haveli
26. UT of            22.11.2019   None of the industry is using pet coke and FO in the UT.
    Lakshadweep
27. UT of            02.12.2019 Puducherry PCC has informed vide letter dt. 02.12.2019 that
    Puducherry                  Draft fuel policy has been prepared and submitted to the
                                Government for approval
                                                                                                  12-   12
8.     Karnataka     31.12.2019    Draft fuel policy has been formulated by State Govt. and
                                   draft policy is under process of finalization/notification.
9.     Kerala        30.10.2019    KSPCB has informed vide letter dt. 30.10.2019 that Draft
                                   fuel policy regarding use of petcoke and FO as fuel has been
                                   prepared and submitted to the State Govt. for issumg
                                   notification.
10.    Madhya        28.09.2019    Order has been issued on 17.07.2017 by State Govt. to allow
       Pradesh                     use of petcoke only after obtaining Consent from MPPCB.
                                   MPPCB can allow use of petcoke on case to case basis after
                                   proper examination of control equipment installed for control
                                   of emission of SO2 and other pollutants. Same policy will be
                                   adopted in case of use ofFO also.
11.    Maharashtra   05.02.2020    SPCB has informed vide letter dated-05.02.2020 that:
                                      • Fuel policy regarding use of petcoke and furnace
                                         oilhas been framed with list of approved fuels and
                                         tirnelines for compliance of fuel policy.
                                       •       Petcokeis allowed 111 Cement Plant/Lime         Kiln,
                                               Calcium carbide and Gasification use.
                                       •       Furnace Oil is allowed in units with conditions of 90
                                               % scrubbing and removal of SO2.
12.     Manipur      20.09.2019     Manipur SPCB has informed vide letter dt. 20.09.2019 that
                                    none of the industry is using petcoke and FO in the State and
                                    therefore the policy regarding use of petcoke and FO may not
                                    be required.
 13.    Meghalaya     25.11.2019    Meghalaya SPCB has informed vide letter dt. 25.11.2019 that
                                    Draft fuel policy has been submitted to the Secretary,
                                    Forests & Environment Department, Govt. of Meghalaya for
                                 necessary action.
 14.    Mizoram       18.10.2019 Mizoram SPCB has informed vide letter dt. 18.10.2019 that
                                 neither petcoke nor FO is in use in the State. State Govt. is
                                 considering relevant information for formulation of policy on
                                   use of petcoke and FO.
 15.    Nagaland      11. l 0.2019 Nagaland SPCB has informed vide letter dt. 11.10.2019 that
                                   Nagaland does not have any plants or industries where fuel
                                   grade pet coke is used. Further, Dept. of Industries &
                                   Commerce, Nagaland has been asked to prepare a policy on
                                    the same.
 16.    Punjab        19.03.2020    SPCB has informed vide letter dated-19.03.2020 that:
                                         • Draft notification for regulating the use of petcoke
                                            and furnace oil is submitted to State Government for
                                                issuance of notification.
                                           •    The use of pet coke and furnace oil and other liquid
                                                                                                       IJ 13
                                                                       Annexure-III
List of States/UTs which have to inform Action Taken on CPCB's Directions Issued for
                  Preparing Policy on Use of Petcoke and Furnace Oil
States
 l.      Arunachal Pradesh
 2.      Assam
 3.      Jharkhand
 4.      Odisha
 5.      West Bengal
                                                                                       14
                                                             Annexure-IV
Versus
With
Versus
For Respondent (s): Mr. Sharat Kapoor and Ms. Salonee Agarwal,
                    Advocates for SAIL.
                    Mr. Alokke Aggarwal, Ms. Anushruti Kushagra, Ms.
                    Kritika Singh and Ms. Rachita, Advocates for
                    respondent no. 11
                    Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for HPSPCB
ORDER
                                                                            15
     to the Steel Processing Unit of the Steel Authority of India in
follows:
                                                                              16
4.   The reason for the above conclusion is huge emission of SO2
four times higher when Low Sulphur Heavy Stock (LSHS) and
cities”. The said cities are spread over almost in all the States,
                                                                          17
     Mohan Titled "NCAP with multiple timelines to clean air in 102
direct that the same may be given effect to. The CPCB may
7.
K. Ramakrishnan, JM
                                                                         18
5
    19
     Item No.02 & 03                                             Court No. 1
                                        Versus
     Union of India & Ors.                                       Respondent(s)
(I.A. No. 32/2019 for stay and I.A. No. 65/2019 for stay)
     For Respondent (s):         Mr. Alok Kumar Aggarwal, Mr. Panni Poddar,
                                 Advocates for R-11
                                 Mr. Rajkumar, Advocate for CPCB
                                 Mr. Sharat Kapoor, Advocate for SAIL
                                 Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Kalpana Devi,
                                 Advocates for R-5
ORDER
1. The issue for consideration is the steps to be taken for controlling the
use of Pet-coke and furnace oil as fuel. The matter was dealt with vide
                                                                                      20
     industries/processes either as feed stock (Calcined Pet-Coke (CPC)
2. The objection to the use of Pet coke and furnace oil, which has
SO2 and other pollutants. The pollution load of SO2 is four times
higher when Low Sulphur Heavy Stock (LSHS) and LDO are used.
for enforcing the above directions and to give a report to the Tribunal.
Submissions:
                                                                                  21
5.   We do not find it necessary to hear the Ministry of Environment,
of the DGFT and as per the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Subject to that, the CPCB may proceed to take further action in the
matter. The Pet-coke and furnace oil may not be allowed except in
S.P. Wangdi, JM
                                                                                22
                                    K. Ramakrishnan, JM
23