Defense of The Trinity
Defense of The Trinity
• Irrationalism
Augustine’s mind analogy for the Trinity
• Tri-theism: That there are three separate different Gods; the Islamic view is
regarded to be an example of this. I might accuse this
• Modalism (Sabellianism): The persons of the Trinity are like the Hindu of the heresy of
Trimurti; merely different appearances, modes, aspects or “faces” of the One
God from the human point of view. partialism as they
• Arianism: Christ was the first and greatest of the Father’s creations. He is the
son of God, and a divinely inspired teacher but not fully divine or God.
are not fully the
• Docetism: Christ is a purely divine being who only had the “appearance” of
mind on their own.
being human
• Partialism: the Father, Son and Holy Spirit together are components of the
one God. This led them to believe that each of the persons of the Trinity is
only part God, only becoming fully God when they come together.
• Irrationalism: Skeptical philosophers like Pierre Bayle (d. 1706) claim the
Also, is the mind a
Trinity is a logical contradiction. The law of non-contradiction, as outlined by mystery thus using
Aristotle, is a fundamental logical assumption (postulate or axiom) that
asserts that two contradictory statements cannot both be true at the same a mystery to
time. Hence, the Trinity is contradictory as it claims that God is both one &
not one at the same time, & that God is three & not three. explain a mystery?
Christian defense/rebuttal responses:
1. The Trinitarian God is supported by scripture and by the personal
mystical and religious experience of Christian believers e.g. the Holy
Spirit at baptism and prayer/worship (This is all
testimony/mysticism/fideism)
Instead, the Trinity is an article of faith that is a true divine mystery and
incomprehensible to the human mind, logic and ordinary language (i.e.,
it is ineffable to use William James’s term).
It is not irrational but rather above reason and cannot be discussed of
meaningfully in literal empirical language because we cannot
comprehend the transcendent. Hence, following the mystic Dionysius,
we need to move from the via positiva to the via negativa – as the
Trinity can be only understood mystically. Cataphatic theology causing
problems again - father, son holy spirit -he isn’t literally these things.
Can we speak about God at all? Is it incoherent in its logic and its
language?
Task: Plan your essay for timed closed book
conditions next lesson
5. “The Trinity is an incoherent doctrine.”
Refer to Christian teachings, give developed arguments to support this
statement, give developed arguments to support a different point of view and
reach a justified conclusion and evaluation.
Three paragraphs
i. Explanation of the doctrine of the Trinity from a Christian perspective (Special
revelation in the Bible/Baptism account, who the three are/what do, Tri-unity
explained, plurality within unity.)
ii. Criticisms of the Trinity – Islamic criticism (Tawhid and divinely simple). Can’t
explain without either committing heresy or appealing to faith because it is
contradictory.
iii. Analysis and rebuttals of criticisms (e.g. Islam commits Tri-Theism heresy and
Straw man fallacy, The Trinity is a Special revelation therefore some divine
mystery and faith involved). Atheist incoherency criticisms and your persuasive
view and conclusion.
Your essay:
1. Explain the Doctrine of the Trinity, include
Augustine's analogy of the mind.
2. Explain the most common heresies committed
when explaining the Trinity (analysis)
3. What are the rebuttals and are they sufficient
justification of the coherency of the doctrine of
the Trinity? (Christian defense and judgement
of/conclusion)